Mozilla message removal eligibility notification (was: Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya)

On 2013-08-08 1:37 AM, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-08-05 08:51 (GMT-0400) Chris Ilias composed: I set replies to my post to go to my email address because this discussion is not SeaMonkey support. It's not even about SeaMonkey. :) SeaMonkey and Firefox are both built on a Gecko/Necko foundatio

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 2013-08-05 08:51 (GMT-0400) Chris Ilias composed: I set replies to my post to go to my email address because this discussion is not SeaMonkey support. It's not even about SeaMonkey. :) SeaMonkey and Firefox are both built on a Gecko/Necko foundation. Consequently, any dumbing down of Firef

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 2013-08-05 1:20 AM, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-08-03 13:18 (GMT-0400) Chris Ilias composed: I'm not sure what you're referring to by "dumb down" It means removing previously included functionality, which generally means fewer choices that a user can make in a default installation; simplifi

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 2013-08-03 13:18 (GMT-0400) Chris Ilias composed: I'm not sure what you're referring to by "dumb down" It means removing previously included functionality, which generally means fewer choices that a user can make in a default installation; simplification at the expense of power and flexib

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

PhillipJones wrote: Rufus wrote: PhillipJones wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/5/13 1:05 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: On 04/08/2013 22:42, Trane Francks wrote: I might hunt for the appropriate download flag to monitor and add it for completeness's sake. Once I'm satisfied it's all working,

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Rufus wrote: PhillipJones wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/5/13 1:05 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: On 04/08/2013 22:42, Trane Francks wrote: I might hunt for the appropriate download flag to monitor and add it for completeness's sake. Once I'm satisfied it's all working, I'll contact the ext

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

PhillipJones wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/5/13 1:05 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: On 04/08/2013 22:42, Trane Francks wrote: I might hunt for the appropriate download flag to monitor and add it for completeness's sake. Once I'm satisfied it's all working, I'll contact the extension author

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/5/13 1:05 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: On 04/08/2013 22:42, Trane Francks wrote: I might hunt for the appropriate download flag to monitor and add it for completeness's sake. Once I'm satisfied it's all working, I'll contact the extension author and offer the updates

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Rufus wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/4/13 4:10 AM +0900, Rufus wrote: ...why can't people just set a Rule for the sound they want to hear when an e-mail comes in from a particular source? Why can't some people recognize that other people have other preferences and/or work-flow requirements

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Rufus wrote: PhillipJones wrote: Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/3/13 1:56 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: There is an extension for Thunderbird: Growl/GNTP for Thunderbird "Requires a ve

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Rufus wrote: PhillipJones wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 2013-08-03 6:52 AM, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you tried using http://code.google.com/p/seamonkey-ppc/ SeaMonkey?? I know it specifically mentions working with G4/G5 Macs, but might also work with your Growl!! (at least

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/5/13 1:05 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: On 04/08/2013 22:42, Trane Francks wrote: I might hunt for the appropriate download flag to monitor and add it for completeness's sake. Once I'm satisfied it's all working, I'll contact the extension author and offer the updates. This might help: <

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 04/08/2013 22:42, Trane Francks wrote: > On 8/4/13 10:06 PM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: >> On 04/08/2013 19:59, Trane Francks wrote: >> >>> The GNTP stuff might be interesting to look at from the perspective of >>> how to trigger on various flags, but the mechanism to talk to Growl >>> 1.2.2 is go

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 10:06 PM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: On 04/08/2013 19:59, Trane Francks wrote: The GNTP stuff might be interesting to look at from the perspective of how to trigger on various flags, but the mechanism to talk to Growl 1.2.2 is going to either be by the now obsolete protocols or via grow

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 04/08/2013 19:59, Trane Francks wrote: > The GNTP stuff might be interesting to look at from the perspective of > how to trigger on various flags, but the mechanism to talk to Growl > 1.2.2 is going to either be by the now obsolete protocols or via > growlnotify. I'll leave it up to others t

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 8:31 PM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: On 04/08/2013 18:41, Trane Francks wrote: On 8/4/13 2:33 PM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: I haven't looked into this in detail but in principle you could implement your own nsIAlertsService in javascript and make yours override the built in service. Hm

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 04/08/2013 18:41, Trane Francks wrote: > On 8/4/13 2:33 PM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: > >> I haven't looked into this in detail but in principle you could >> implement your own nsIAlertsService in javascript and make yours >> override the built in service. > > Hm. That's an interesting idea

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 2:33 PM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: I haven't looked into this in detail but in principle you could implement your own nsIAlertsService in javascript and make yours override the built in service. Hm. That's an interesting idea. It seems a bit more complex than I'd hoped, though, b

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/4/13 10:07 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: Snow Leopard, the OS, does not run on the PPC architecture, but it does have the necessary emulation to run apps compiled for it. Of course, but SM has had Intel versions available all along, and you have

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/3/13 7:52 PM +0900, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you tried using http://code.google.com/p/seamonkey-ppc/ SeaMonkey?? I know it specifically mentions working with G4/G5 Macs, but might also work with your Growl!! (at least until the V 2 comes out!!) Assuming that the PPC

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 04/08/2013 10:22, Trane Francks wrote: > On 8/4/13 10:13 AM +0900, Rufus wrote: >> Trane Francks wrote: > >>> Why can't some people recognize that other people have other preferences >>> and/or work-flow requirements? ;-) >>> >> >> ...yeah - but you're out in the cold, so it's time to light a f

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 11:28 AM +0900, Ed Mullen wrote: I'm not following this thread other than having new messages shanghai my visits to this group but I have to say this: Never heard of Growl or any of the other things talked about here. Is there any reason I should have? Whether Growl is interesting

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 11:55 AM +0900, Rufus wrote: Trane Francks wrote: Which I'm doing: I'm working with Thunderbird-specific growlnotify and tweaking the code to work with SeaMonkey. I'm confident that I'll be ...then you have more firewood than I do! I hope so. The next step will be for me to down

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/4/13 10:13 AM +0900, Rufus wrote: Trane Francks wrote: Why can't some people recognize that other people have other preferences and/or work-flow requirements? ;-) ...yeah - but you're out in the cold, so it's time to light a fire. Which I'm doing: I'm working wi

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forward". This would be grand except for the fact that OS X Snow Leopard and Lion

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 10:13 AM +0900, Rufus wrote: Trane Francks wrote: Why can't some people recognize that other people have other preferences and/or work-flow requirements? ;-) ...yeah - but you're out in the cold, so it's time to light a fire. Which I'm doing: I'm working with Thunderbird-specifi

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 10:07 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: Snow Leopard, the OS, does not run on the PPC architecture, but it does have the necessary emulation to run apps compiled for it. Of course, but SM has had Intel versions available all along, and you have an Intel, so it's bey

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/4/13 4:10 AM +0900, Rufus wrote: ...why can't people just set a Rule for the sound they want to hear when an e-mail comes in from a particular source? Why can't some people recognize that other people have other preferences and/or work-flow requirements? ;-) ...ye

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/4/13 9:24 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: Really? So you have seen Snow Leopard running on PPC? I think not. Fair enough. The suggestion by Daniel to maybe run SeaMonkey PPC, however, would not be thwarted by me running Snow Leopard. I have Rosetta installed and still

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 4:10 AM +0900, Rufus wrote: ...why can't people just set a Rule for the sound they want to hear when an e-mail comes in from a particular source? Why can't some people recognize that other people have other preferences and/or work-flow requirements? ;-) I have 8 accounts and all m

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/4/13 9:24 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: Really? So you have seen Snow Leopard running on PPC? I think not. Fair enough. The suggestion by Daniel to maybe run SeaMonkey PPC, however, would not be thwarted by me running Snow Leopard. I have Rosetta installed and still have at least one P

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

PhillipJones wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 2013-08-03 6:52 AM, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you tried using http://code.google.com/p/seamonkey-ppc/ SeaMonkey?? I know it specifically mentions working with G4/G5 Macs, but might also work with your Growl!! (at least until the V

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

PhillipJones wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 2013-08-03 6:52 AM, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you tried using http://code.google.com/p/seamonkey-ppc/ SeaMonkey?? I know it specifically mentions working with G4/G5 Macs, but might also work with your Growl!! (at least until the V 2

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

PhillipJones wrote: Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/3/13 1:56 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: There is an extension for Thunderbird: Growl/GNTP for Thunderbird "Requires a version of Growl

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/3/13 1:56 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: There is an extension for Thunderbird: Growl/GNTP for Thunderbird "Requires a version of Growl that supports GNTP, su

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Geoff Welsh wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: On 2013-08-03 6:52 AM, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you tried using http://code.google.com/p/seamonkey-ppc/ SeaMonkey?? I know it specifically mentions working with G4/G5 Macs, but might also work with your Growl!! (at least until the V 2 comes out!!) PPC su

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Chris Ilias wrote: On 2013-08-03 6:52 AM, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you tried using http://code.google.com/p/seamonkey-ppc/ SeaMonkey?? I know it specifically mentions working with G4/G5 Macs, but might also work with your Growl!! (at least until the V 2 comes out!!) PPC support has nothing to

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Rufus wrote: ...why can't people just set a Rule for the sound they want to hear when an e-mail comes in from a particular source? Personally, I don't use SM as my primary mail client - I use Apple Mail. I only use SM Mail for convenience as I'm browsing or "usenetting"...is that a word? it'

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Daniel wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/3/13 1:56 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: There is an extension for Thunderbird: Growl/GNTP for Thunderbird "Requires a version of Growl that supports GNTP, such as Growl for

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 2013-08-03 2:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-08-02 19:08 (GMT-0400) Chris Ilias composed: Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-08-01 06:44 (GMT+0900) Trane Francks composed: So, uh, who exactly thought this was moving forward? For those of us who The same people who have been removing other fe

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 2013-08-03 6:52 AM, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you tried using http://code.google.com/p/seamonkey-ppc/ SeaMonkey?? I know it specifically mentions working with G4/G5 Macs, but might also work with your Growl!! (at least until the V 2 comes out!!) PPC support has nothing to do with Growl suppo

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/3/13 7:52 PM +0900, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you tried using http://code.google.com/p/seamonkey-ppc/ SeaMonkey?? I know it specifically mentions working with G4/G5 Macs, but might also work with your Growl!! (at least until the V 2 comes out!!) Assuming that the PPC build is based on pla

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/3/13 1:56 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: There is an extension for Thunderbird: Growl/GNTP for Thunderbird "Requires a version of Growl that supports GNTP, such as Growl for Windows (http:/

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 2013-08-02 19:08 (GMT-0400) Chris Ilias composed: Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-08-01 06:44 (GMT+0900) Trane Francks composed: So, uh, who exactly thought this was moving forward? For those of us who The same people who have been removing other features at every opportunity, trying to d

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Philip Chee wrote: On 02/08/2013 08:39, Trane Francks wrote: On 8/2/13 6:37 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: I see from Phil Chee's post, however, that the Growl support dropping was not an SM decision though. Must be the FF guys? Yeah, I guess. To be honest, I don't really see where a web brow

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/2/13 5:43 PM +0900, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-08-01 06:44 (GMT+0900) Trane Francks composed: So, uh, who exactly thought this was moving forward? For those of us who The same people who have been removing other features at every opportunity, trying to dumb Mozilla

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 2013-08-02 4:43 AM, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-08-01 06:44 (GMT+0900) Trane Francks composed: So, uh, who exactly thought this was moving forward? For those of us who The same people who have been removing other features at every opportunity, trying to dumb Mozilla products down to the lev

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/3/13 1:56 AM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: There is an extension for Thunderbird: Growl/GNTP for Thunderbird "Requires a version of Growl that supports GNTP, such as Growl for Windows (http://www.growlforwindows.co

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 02/08/2013 08:39, Trane Francks wrote: > On 8/2/13 6:37 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: > >> I see from Phil Chee's post, however, that the Growl support dropping >> was not an SM decision though. >> >> Must be the FF guys? > > Yeah, I guess. To be honest, I don't really see where a web browser

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/2/13 5:43 PM +0900, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-08-01 06:44 (GMT+0900) Trane Francks composed: So, uh, who exactly thought this was moving forward? For those of us who The same people who have been removing other features at every opportunity, trying to dumb Mozilla products down to the

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 2013-08-01 06:44 (GMT+0900) Trane Francks composed: It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forward". This would be grand except for the f

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/2/13 12:34 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: PhillipJones wrote: But SeaMonkey is not just a web Browser it is an email Client as well. And that is where Seamonkey can use Growl Indeed. After the fact, I realized that FF users benefit from such notifications as download completions, etc. I

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

PhillipJones wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/2/13 6:37 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: I see from Phil Chee's post, however, that the Growl support dropping was not an SM decision though. Must be the FF guys? Yeah, I guess. To be honest, I don't really see where a web browser would benefit fr

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/2/13 6:37 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: I see from Phil Chee's post, however, that the Growl support dropping was not an SM decision though. Must be the FF guys? Yeah, I guess. To be honest, I don't really see where a web browser would benefit from notifications. If

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/2/13 10:15 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/growl-notifications/ is what I, mistakenly, thought you were talking about to begin with Oh, I see. That was the original circa-2007 add-on that was developed to enable Firefox to talk to Growl (alrea

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/2/13 6:37 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: I see from Phil Chee's post, however, that the Growl support dropping was not an SM decision though. Must be the FF guys? Yeah, I guess. To be honest, I don't really see where a web browser would benefit from notifications. If

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/2/13 6:37 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: I see from Phil Chee's post, however, that the Growl support dropping was not an SM decision though. Must be the FF guys? Yeah, I guess. To be honest, I don't really see where a web browser would benefit from notifications. If the core Growl code

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/1/13 9:53 PM +0900, Philip Chee wrote: SeaMonkey (and Thunderbird) devs were not involved in removing Growl at all. This is all backend Core code. We did have to manage fallout in SeaMonkey and Thunderbird because of this though. That's probably because Growl support is/was so useful to b

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 8/1/13 2:18 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: But since SM already makes an alert noise, when it gets mail, I can't imagine what I would need it for. The intended user undoubtedly does all sorts of things I've never heard of with their Mac. I run Spaces

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/1/13 2:18 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: But since SM already makes an alert noise, when it gets mail, I can't imagine what I would need it for. The intended user undoubtedly does all sorts of things I've never heard of with their Mac. I run Spaces with 6 desktops defi

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/1/13 9:39 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I use the read/unread (plain/bold) marking to distinguish things that still need attention. If the message is bolded, that means I'm not done Yeah, I totally get it. Alas, I have over a hundred folders, so it's easier to

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/1/13 9:39 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I use the read/unread (plain/bold) marking to distinguish things that still need attention. If the message is bolded, that means I'm not done Yeah, I totally get it. Alas, I have over a hundred folders, so it's easier to deal first and sort la

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 01/08/2013 12:40, Trane Francks wrote: > On 8/1/13 1:24 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: >> Rufus wrote: > >>> I tried using Growl for a bit and found it to be just flat annoying. So >>> I killed and removed it. >>> >>> I feel the same way about Notification Center - it's just something I >>> don'

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 01/08/2013 05:44, Trane Francks wrote: > It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support > in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer > was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forward". This would > be grand except for the fact t

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/1/13 7:19 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Filters really come in handy here. I don't just let all my new mail end up in the various inboxes. I have nearly a hundred filters that route them to the right boxes so I can see at a glance (for example) if I have mail fro

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/1/13 7:19 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Oh, well. It sounded like you did have several instances open, judging by your statement about several desktops. Nah. I use each desktop as a sort of "workflow theme". Console and file system access on desktop 1, browsers and e-mail on 2, prog

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/1/13 6:41 PM +0900, Daniel wrote: Trane, have you looked at Edit->Preferences->Mail & Newsgroups->Notifications?? If you set it up to show the three selectable items, it would be the same for all accounts, but at least, if you're at the computer, you might have half a clue which Mail Accou

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/1/13 4:25 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: If the OP is running multiple instances of SM with different user profiles, it might be nice to have what the phone company calls a "distinctive ring" so he'd know by the sound which account just got mail. Yeah, that migh

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: On 8/1/13 4:25 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: If the OP is running multiple instances of SM with different user profiles, it might be nice to have what the phone company calls a "distinctive ring" so he'd know by the sound which account just got mail. Yeah, that might

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/1/13 4:25 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: If the OP is running multiple instances of SM with different user profiles, it might be nice to have what the phone company calls a "distinctive ring" so he'd know by the sound which account just got mail. Yeah, that might be a partial solution

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Geoff Welsh wrote: Ahhh. I see: "The Ultimate Notification System for OS X. Growl is the easiest way to know what's going on with your applications." But since SM already makes an alert noise, when it gets mail, I can't imagine what I would need it for. The intended user undoubtedly does all

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/1/13 2:18 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: But since SM already makes an alert noise, when it gets mail, I can't imagine what I would need it for. The intended user undoubtedly does all sorts of things I've never heard of with their Mac. I run Spaces with 6 desktops defined. When e-mail come

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

PhillipJones wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forwar

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forward". This would be gra

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

On 8/1/13 1:24 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: I tried using Growl for a bit and found it to be just flat annoying. So I killed and removed it. I feel the same way about Notification Center - it's just something I don't need or care about...so on the machine where I do have it, I h

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forward". This would be grand except for the fa

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forward". This would be grand except for the fact that OS X S

Re: So long Growl, we hardly new ya

Trane Francks wrote: It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forward". This would be grand except for the fact that OS X Snow Leopard and Lion

So long Growl, we hardly new ya

It is with great disappointment that I see the demise of Growl support in SeaMonkey 2.19. In looking for the reasoning behind this, the answer was apparently that "Notification Centre is the way forward". This would be grand except for the fact that OS X Snow Leopard and Lion both do not *have*