PlusBus zone boundaries are defined by the stoppoints at the edges of the
zones. It should be possible to draw straight lines between each of the
boundary points to define the polygon of the area they cover (all stops within
such a polygon are members of that PlusBus zone). The exceptional
I have create a new top level page for 'transit' and redirected
'public transport' to that page.
Take a look here and tell me what you think, and do of course make it
better!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Transit
I am also proposing to write basic articles for each of the individual
On 5 Aug 2009 14:59:04 +0100, Peter Miller wrote:
I totally agree, however we are just setting out on a long journey to
capture all the transit data for the world, so lets get the modelling
clear now and not be held back by some tag-updating!
As we are aware the various transit strands
On 6 Aug 2009, at 14:07, Frankie Roberto wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
snip
b) splitting the pages down into smaller components - eg railways,
bus stops, train services, train stations, etc. Whilst it's good to
have an overall
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Hillsman, Edward hills...@cutr.usf.eduwrote:
It now appears likely that our research center will receive funding to
begin developing a multimodal trip planner using OpenStreetMap data.
Firstly, congratulations on the getting this funding (presuming it gets
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.comwrote:
I notice that Frankie has created a new Tram page (no content yet but
it will come).
Yup!
Is 'transit' a synonym for 'public transport'? or not. If not then
what is the difference?
For me, as a native
I added our plans to form an OSM-PH org here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters
I also requested/nominated Entrhopia to take on the interim Sec/Treas
position at the moment.
Another thing we should look into:
Local Chapters would pay the Foundation a fee based on the
I don't see this in potlatch, or am I blind? :) (Fuel/Gas/Petrol)
It's certainly a point of interest that I'd like to see on a map if
I'm on the road.
--
eric pareja (eric.par...@gmail.com) LPIC-2 | PGP/GPG Key 0xB82E42D9
Coordinator for Technology / Senior Linux Trainer
National Telehealth
I just double-click on the POI location then choose 'petrol station' under
'(no preset)', or drag the Parking icon then change it to 'petrol station'.
-Original Message-
From: talk-ph-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-ph-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of eric pareja
Sent:
I think I mentioned this before but I disagree with the fee. In the draft
agreement, the idea is to pay £10 *for each member of the local chapter*! I
think this is too much.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:36 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:
I added our plans to form an OSM-PH org
no prob. I can give updates if you need it.
Kelan ba magkakaroon ng IdeaCamp Manila?
On 8/7/09, George Tujan gtu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the stats maning. If its ok with you, we'd like to use it
for the next ideacampdavao presentation
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:06 AM, maning
September 12, 2009...its Marloue's turn to talk about OSM :)
sige we'll need updated data talaga. TIA!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:32 AM, maning
sambaleemmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
no prob. I can give updates if you need it.
Kelan ba magkakaroon ng IdeaCamp Manila?
On 8/7/09, George Tujan
Hehehe i didn't get your post, ideacamp manila pala hehehe may isang
group that wants to take it there but I'm not sure if matuloy, but in
any case ideacamp itself is just an idea you can actually make one
there and the guys here would definitely love and support it
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:46
Second week of September right? Just in time for our OSM-PH GPS Map
scheduled release.
As a contribution to Davao efforts, I will provide updates to:
1. OSM-PH Garmin Map
2. OSM-PH Magellan Map for Davao
3. OSM-PH-Contour Garmin Map for Davao (sana this map will help
hikers/mountaineers add
The GPS map? Syor!
Maybe they want to host the svn and trac as well (joke).
On 8/7/09, George Tujan gtu...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice! incidentally Holden Hao of DabaweGNU approached me last week and
ask if it would be possible for DabawenGNU to link/host your maps as
well.
On Fri, Aug 7,
Ok I'll be Sec/Tres. Will Eugene be President? Para maform na :) Lapit
lang bahay natin sa south.
Andre
maning sambale wrote:
You're doing some the roles at the moment (tres/sec). I nominate you then. :)
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Andre Marcelo-Tanneran...@enthropia.com wrote:
We
What would be the point of paying? It says a local chapter can use the
logo and osm domain and promote osm. Isnt counter-productive to charge
an organization which wants to help improve OSM locally by its own
resources/costs? A per member fee is rather high, maybe a low chapter
fee would be
Zdravo Ales,
Zanimiv pristop, se popolnoma strinjam. Mogoce kasneje najdemo se kaksno
drugo open-source karto z boljso resolucijo, pa tisto uvozimo naknadno.
Edino bi pripomnil, da je treba vrisati le manjkajoco mejo s Hrvasko, ker so
ostale ze vrisane iz drugih (verjetno bolj natancnih) virov.
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote:
What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be
commercial or retail.
For the area of the hotel:
amenity=hotel
And for the hotel itself:
amenity=hotel, building=yes
(For reference see amnenity=university)
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Bear in mind that the highway tags aren't meant
to be a sliding scale of importance, or follow a strict hierarchy.
-1. I would contradict this for streets.
I would correct that. Roads that form the main road network have a scale of
importance - yes - but once we
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote:
What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be
commercial or retail.
For the area of the hotel:
amenity=hotel
And for the hotel itself:
amenity=hotel, building=yes
(For
On 6 Aug 2009, at 07:47, Mark Williams wrote:
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote:
What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be
commercial or retail.
For the area of the hotel:
amenity=hotel
And for the hotel
Could you please give examples of usage on that page?
In the main most chains, such as the Tesco supermarket have the tags
shop=supermarket; name=Tesco, which I don't think is compatible with
your idea of having an operator and name tag where you would put the
name of the branch (for
Hello,
I am interested in OSM's database.
The schema in the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Database/Model; is
out of date.
Who knows the way it is now?
Cheers
Gianfranco
_
Scarica i nuovi gadget per personalizzare
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
This is not how it is generally used over here (Germany) where the
majority of people use unclassified for a road roughly equal to
residential but without people living there.
And suddenly changing the meaning of a widely used tag is a really,
really bad idea.
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote:
What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be
commercial or retail.
For the area of the hotel:
amenity=hotel
And for the hotel itself:
amenity=hotel, building=yes
(For
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Ulf Möller use...@ulfm.de wrote:
And suddenly changing the meaning of a widely used tag is a
really,
really bad idea.
Well I was right, it is too ambiguous :)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 06/08/09 09:01, Gianfranco Gliozzo wrote:
I am interested in OSM's database.
The schema in the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Database/Model; is out of date.
Who knows the way it is now?
Trust the code, not the documentation:
How do I modify a variable in a template on the wiki.
In the Swedish version of the place-template there's a link to a
weather site with forecasts for the city. Works for all Swedish cities
as long as there is no space in the area name. However, for Vastra
Gotaland the url of the area part to the
Birgit
This is late as I have been away in Finland for three weeks. I like your
proposal as I have often searched the wiki for something like this. I have
taken the liberty of adding a voting section to your proposal page and
adding my vote in favour as the first entry. Hope this is OK!
Mike
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
And suddenly changing the meaning of a widely used tag is a
really,
really bad idea.
Well I was right, it is too ambiguous :)
and then we find out that whatever track translates to in German is not the
same as what track means in Au.
so again we have
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
this doesn't look very familiar to me. Do you know the following?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Conditions_for_access_
tags
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_conditions_fo
r_access_tags
there
David's summary is imho a good one. There are subtle but not hard-and-fast
distinctions between 'sheltered accommodation' for those who can manage in
their own place but need a warden around (and perhaps a community room or a
public kitchen) and 'nursing home' for those in need of greater care,
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
and then we find out that whatever track translates to in
German is not the
same as what track means in Au.
so again we have widely used tags who are about to change
their meaning
It means about the same from what I've seen, a forestry type
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Martin, its only 5 days a week and not in school holidays
so how do we expand the tagging to cover the full set of
restrictions?
No matter what happens school holidays or the inverse can be mapped to some
administrative boundary.
Western
Konrad Skeri schrieb:
How do I modify a variable in a template on the wiki.
In the Swedish version of the place-template there's a link to a
weather site with forecasts for the city. Works for all Swedish cities
as long as there is no space in the area name. However, for Vastra
Gotaland
John Smith wrote:
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Where we fail is that we don't have anything less significant than
unclassified for non-residential areas. In particular, country roads
that
aren't particularly routable, but still have a passable
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
That's proposing highway=rural as something less
significant than tertiary
(bad, we already have unclassified for that), not something
less significant
than unclassified (good, we don't have anything like that
in rural
I'm coming to sympathise with the rendering gods, this really is going round
in circles isn't it!
The advantage of a new highway tag is a nice clear match between tag and
reality, leading to better performance by taggers, renderers and routers.
The disadvantage is confusion in the transitionary
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm concluding that - while you wouldn't start
from here - the existing tagging can be made to work, though
the documentation should be improved. We don't really
need another level in the countryside, and there
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:51 AM, John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
The problem with this is it requires urban areas to be in existence for the
routing to work, so this is a bad idea as well.
Routers can look for an abutters tag just as easily as using an urban area
polygon.
Richard
John Smith wrote:
The distinction is that highway=rural isn't as well maintained, or
has as much traffic as highway=residential, so if residential is
lower than unclassified, then rural is lower than residential, but
higher than track
Rural is lower than residential doesn't arise,
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Routers can look for an abutters tag just as easily as
using an urban area polygon.
They don't always exist either. That's the problem, lots of Australia is just
blank or very near to it.
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Richard Mann wrote:
The problem with this is it requires urban areas to be in existence for
the routing to work, so this is a bad idea as well.
Routers can look for an abutters tag just as easily as using an urban area
polygon.
Richard
abutters has not been used in our
Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com writes:
David's summary is imho a good one. There are subtle but not hard-and-fast
distinctions between 'sheltered accommodation' for those who can manage in
their own place but need a warden around (and perhaps a community room or a
public kitchen) and
2009/8/6 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Sounds good to me. An improvement. Look forward to seeing the
individual tag definitions cleaned up accordingly (eventually).
that would probably be a fulltime-job ;-)
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
2009/8/6 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Bear in mind that the highway tags aren't meant
to be a sliding scale of importance, or follow a strict hierarchy.
-1. I would contradict this for streets.
I would correct that. Roads that form the main road network have a
2009/8/6 John McKerrell j...@mckerrell.net:
On 6 Aug 2009, at 07:47, Mark Williams wrote:
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote:
What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be
commercial or retail.
For the area of the
On 6 Aug 2009, at 12:06, John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Routers can look for an abutters tag just as easily as
using an urban area polygon.
The abutters tag is dwindling in use as landuse polygons should be
used
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
Peter
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The argument about 'is way x better than way y'
where one is residential and one is unclassified is the mistake being made,
and I would still like some one the provide a situation where unclassified
would be used in an urban area which is by default
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
That is a lack of data problem, there is nothing that you
can do about it other than go out and do some mapping!
I penned this email about a week ago.
I was watching the State of the Map Canadian talk and they point out how
How do I modify a variable in a template on the wiki.
In the Swedish version of the place-template there's a link to a
weather site with forecasts for the city. Works for all Swedish cities
as long as there is no space in the area name. However, for Vastra
Gotaland the url of the area part
2009/8/6 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
this doesn't look very familiar to me. Do you know the following?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Conditions_for_access_
tags
Peter Körner wrote:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
It looks to me like a lot of place=town nodes have been added that might very
well be
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.ukwrote:
The abutters tag is dwindling in use as landuse polygons should be used
instead as the new way of doing things.
Agree, but you wouldn't test against a landuse polygon anyway, you'd test
against an urban area
Peter Körner schrieb:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
Peter
Addendum: This seems to be bad imports by user cyana:
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
It looks to me like a lot of place=town nodes have been added
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Rural is lower than residential doesn't arise, because by
definition residential means a built-up area, so it ain't
rural.
Exactly.
I would humbly suggest highway=minor is a better tag
because
Someone already did and it
2009/8/6 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
And suddenly changing the meaning of a widely used tag is a
really,
really bad idea.
Well I was right, it is too ambiguous :)
and then we find out that whatever track translates to in German is not the
same as what
2009/8/6 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
If there are countries where the road classification system identifies
tertiary roads distinctly then fair enough, but most of the residential and
service roads in the UK are probably tertiary rather than unclassified, which
puts them above
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
actually track implies even within Germany different things (legally,
due to the federal organisation), as in Baden-Württemberg it is
generally forbidden to use them even without special signs, where in
the rest
Konrad Skeri wrote:
we should redefine the syntax of the highway-tag from scratch.
I don't think this is not at all a good idea. This affects on of the
basics of mapping OSM and is considered as having an larger impact than
inventing a new API.
Maybe we should just add more/additional
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Lester Caine wrote:
Currently there SHOULD be a landuse/natural tag for each area on a map as
using amenity= creates another level of complexity. One may still has to
decide what to use for landuse if the tag itself is missing. I still think
'landuse=natural' with a sub
Hello,
looking at the foundation web site and the wiki, there is very few
information on the local chapter working group - only a draft of the
federation agreement is linked withought an information on the version
or date it was created! Additionally there are no meeting minutes
available at
As indicated, I've had a go at a rewrite of the unclassified page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
Comments in the usual place (or have your own go at hacking it)
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/8/6 Joseph Scanlan n7...@arrl.net:
I suppose if a hotel is surrounded by commercial landuse then there's no
point making a little retail island to hold it.
+1
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/6 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
If there are countries where the road classification system identifies
tertiary roads distinctly then fair enough, but most of the residential and
service roads in the UK are probably tertiary rather than unclassified, which
2009/8/6 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
As indicated, I've had a go at a rewrite of the unclassified page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
Comments in the usual place (or have your own go at hacking it)
actually there are 3 things in the
2009/8/6 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/6 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
If there are countries where the road classification system identifies
tertiary roads distinctly then fair enough, but most of the residential and
service roads in the UK are
Hi Greg
Thanks for useful input - agree that US 'assisted living' = UK 'sheltered
accommodation'. Medical care (or at least nursing care) is indeed the key
difference. Although a Brit I have lived twice in the USA (as well as
briefly in Germany) so am reasonably au fait with the THREE ((;)
Konrad Skeri wrote:
How do I modify a variable in a template on the wiki.
In the Swedish version of the place-template there's a link to a
weather site with forecasts for the city. Works for all Swedish cities
as long as there is no space in the area name. However, for Vastra
Gotaland the
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Mike Harrismik...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for useful input - agree that US 'assisted living' = UK 'sheltered
accommodation'. Medical care (or at least nursing care) is indeed the key
difference. Although a Brit I have lived twice in the USA (as well as
There is still something wrong here :
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry//?lat=51.894lon=9.1909
Thank you for submitting the bug. Unfortunately, it revealed a larger fault.
However, I've added a temporary patch such that the area should work in about
3 hours (22h00 UTC).
Cheers,
2009/8/6 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
It looks to me
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/6 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there could be
maxspeed[08:30-09:30]=40
maxspeed[14:30-15:30]=40
maxspeed[08:30-09:30]:reason=school_zone
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Richard
Mannrichard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
As indicated, I've had a go at a rewrite of the unclassified page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
Comments in the usual place (or have your own go at hacking it)
I've
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
2009/8/6 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
maxspeed[school_days][08:30-09:30]=40
Except that is putting values on the key side of things. To do things properly
you would need something like this.
maxspeed:school_zone=40
maxspeed:school_zone:on=08:30-09:30;14:30-15:30
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:55 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
maxspeed[school_days][08:30-09:30]=40
Except that is putting values on the key side of things. To do things
properly you would need something like this.
Hi,
is there a copyright on the osm logo? I just want to make a logo for openmtbmap
and the idea is modifying the osm logo to show the osm-affiliation.
Kai___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Without that requirement, it's a one-liner:
maxspeed[Tu,Th][12:00-24:00] = 50
You've gone from school zones to general restrictions.
School zones as signed in Australia are predicable to some extent, they are
always mon-fri and
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:42 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Without that requirement, it's a one-liner:
maxspeed[Tu,Th][12:00-24:00] = 50
You've gone from school zones to general restrictions.
That's right. Sorry if
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm ok, fair enough, you've convinced me - although you'd
probably
want to use maxspeed:time_limited to indicate that the
value is not a
time, but a full description of a time-limited
restriction.
It's a limit so stating limited
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 21:43:57 Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 05/08/09 20:21 +0200 - Rejo Zenger:
Die 25 issues wil ik ook wegwerken, door het op te lossen of als false
positive te markeren. Voor een deel wacht dat op onsite survey, andere
dingen weet ik niet hoe ik het moet oplossen.
[...]
On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:36:34 Lambert Carsten wrote:
Ik snap waarom Keep Right hier een melding van maakt. Mijn vraag heeft
wederom niet zoveel met dat issue te maken: hoe hoor dat perron getekend
te zijn? En die trap omhoog. Mij lijkt het dat die trap er wel hoort,
maar die way
++ 06/08/09 10:36 +0200 - Lambert Carsten:
Overigens voeg ik zelf alleen trappen toe daar waar die echt een nieuwe
verbinding vormen, bijvoorbeeld een trap die een brug/viaduct die de
weg eronder direct bereikbaar maakt voor voetgangers. In bovenstaande
geval was er al een verbinding.
Ook
On Thursday 06 August 2009 11:18:00 Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 06/08/09 10:36 +0200 - Lambert Carsten:
Overigens voeg ik zelf alleen trappen toe daar waar die echt een nieuwe
verbinding vormen, bijvoorbeeld een trap die een brug/viaduct die de
weg eronder direct bereikbaar maakt voor voetgangers.
Well, what information do you want it to get across? Do we want OSM Australia
to become some form of semi-official name for OSM activities/groups in
Australia? Or do we just want a sign which says There's an OpenStreetMap
mapping party meeting here, this is what you look for to find us in which
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
Well, what information do you want it
to get across?
Don't want look like a dork waiting for everyone to turn up :)
Do we want OSM Australia to
become some form of semi-official name for OSM
activities/groups in
I'm just still not sure if we should categorise paths so they display
correctly with the current limitations of a rendering algorithm.
When reading the main wiki
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Cycleway ) I understand the
definition of cycleway to mean bicycle only paths or
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
I'm just still not sure if we should categorise paths so
they display
correctly with the current limitations of a rendering
algorithm.
What limitation? :)
We're currently in the process of defining how things render how we choose, we
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
I can't find the email with the Wiki link
For the record...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aussie_Mapnik_Style_Changes
Also I've been trying to stick the category tags on the Aussie specific pages.
On Thursday 06 Aug 2009 09:21:59 John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
I'm just still not sure if we should categorise paths so
they display
correctly with the current limitations of a rendering
algorithm.
What limitation? :)
We're currently in the
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
A complicated solution would be to have user options
similar to non-web
applications. Tick-box to emphasise paths that have
bicycle = yes tag. The
current cycle map is good but tick-boxes for other
properties such as fuel,
bbq,
On Thursday 06 Aug 2009 10:13:47 John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
A complicated solution would be to have user options
similar to non-web
applications. Tick-box to emphasise paths that have
bicycle = yes tag. The
current cycle map is good but
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:30:02 +0200
Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
Maybe slightly off-topic but does the current rendering engine obey the width
parameter? I wanted to fix up a river that is in some parts 10m wide and
others 100m. Would setting the width be the correct way to make it
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
highway=ford doesn't render
I've come across this before, I just made the ford the node that crosses,
not the way.
I've got one which renders on JOSM, as a node
it's like a little car in the water
___
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Evan Sebire wrote:
A complicated solution would be to have user options similar to non-web
applications. Tick-box to emphasise paths that have bicycle = yes tag. The
current cycle map is good but tick-boxes for other properties such as fuel,
bbq, motel etc. The rendering
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
I've got one which renders on JOSM, as a node
it's like a little car in the water
Would that mean the same thing to you if you've never used JOSM?
well it is of course wrong to assume there would be water.
I was just thinking that the graphic could be
1 - 100 of 276 matches
Mail list logo
