Ed Loach wrote:
> Or perhaps someone should write a OneWayBot to change all
> oneway=true tags to oneway=yes? And perhaps all the -1s could be yes
> as well
-1 isn't the same as "yes". -1 means "one way in the opposite
direction from the way". It's largely a hangover from the days of
segments
Dave Stubbs wrote:
> with 1 hit each for "0", "south", "?", "west", "+1", "Yes", and BAN
> POTLATCH!!1!3: "-1; 1", "true; yes"
Apparently these days people actually cause tag conflicts just to see
the cute little floating alert and hear the "beep" sound.
cheers
Richard
__
Hendrik T. Voelker wrote:
> Granted, that might limit the development to Java programmers but hey, if you
> know one iterative language, you can easily learn another.
I can't be the only person on this list spluttering in disbelief at
this. Absolutely no way. At all.
Hey, I don't even know wha
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> You can also use www.informationfreeway.org which gives you the mouse
> pointer lat/lon in the bottom right corner.
Or (magic keypress alert) you can click 'Edit' to open Potlatch, move
your pointer to the right place, and press L.
cheers
Richard
__
Adrian wrote:
> Hopefully someone here can explain this for me.
I'll try!
> The legal FAQ says that derived data products (that are distributed)
> must be made available under the terms of the licence - I interpret
> that
> to mean for free, am I badly wrong?
You are. The licence, like all op
I'm thinking of disabling zoom level 12 in Potlatch, to reduce load on
the server. It's probably too far zoomed out to be able to do any
useful editing anyway.
Low-res (Landsat) Yahoo kicks in at level 13 so you'd still be able to
access this.
Would anyone's editing be inconvenienced by thi
http://www.edparsons.com/2008/10/who-map-is-it-anyway/
cheers
Richard
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Christiano -- Thanks for that. My guess would be that using the WMS in
> an OAM-external environment would actually violate the recommendation
> to use the i-cubed dataset only within OAM. My take on it would be
> that, as long as there's still uncertainty as to licensing
Matthias Julius wrote:
> I could imagine that a significant sub-set of users are interested in
> this, especially of those users that care about OSM right now.
>
> Why not do something different that OS, Google and Co.?
Absolutely - do something different. But make the most of the freedom
- do
Ben Laenen wrote:
> just a little question about recent Potlatch versions: I've noticed
> that
> from time to time changes are uploaded while objects are still
> selected. I remember that it used to be that it only uploaded changes
> on deselecting.
If it's changed, that's a bug, steps to repro
Ben Laenen wrote:
> Well, it only starts happening when I've done quite a lot of
> mapping, so
> pinpointing the exact trigger for it is difficult... I can only tell
> that it happens regularly after mapping for a while.
Got it, I think; will be fixed in 0.11e (trac #1256).
cheers
Richard
___
Nic Roets wrote:
> Or change potlatch so that it will not delete or modify objects last
> edited by other users. Then it would at least be easy to delete
> anything they did.
Tell you what, let's completely ban all editors - that'll eliminate
the risk of vandalism.
Richard
___
vegard wrote:
> Like it or not, potlach *is* the source of quite a bit of accidental
> vandalism. It's easy to use for beginners, but they will *not*
> understand the implications of what they are doing. The sanbox
> helped a
> lot, but obviously not enough.
>
> I believe you need some sort of o
Nic Roets wrote:
> Ban the talk-list, so that we stop tagging the bikeshed and start
> contributing.
Superb idea. I was actually doing some stuff on Potlatch 1.0 before
this bloody thread distracted me. :(
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openst
If you use a Linux system and would prefer not to use the Adobe Flash
Player, you can now use Gnash - the GPL-licensed SWF player - to run
Potlatch.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/gnash/?branch_id=64471&release_id=286570
Full credit to the Gnash devs who have done an outstanding job here.
che
Peter Miller wrote:
> Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
>
>> For example, I'm not sure but I think that "Publishing a simple map
>> in a book, newsletter" would require a not-so-simple requirement to
>> make the data they used available, somehow...
>
> I agree. Would you like to propose the wording? (an
Moved from newbies@ to talk@, followups to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Ewen wrote:
> In this part of the world, the best
> way I have found to collect road data is to drive the road, convert
> the track to locked ways, cut the track into small segments that
> Potlatch will convert, tie them all back
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> I just tried to compile 0.8.4 and found it to be completely unusable
> for potlatch, the cursor seemed to update once every few seconds
> making it hard to select anything, I was unable to edit keys and the
> potlatch user interface had all the wrong dimensions or
spaetz wrote:
> check the wiki, there are a few people that have the "I release my
> data as PD template on their user pages". I would expect the biggest
> problem is that existing data is likely to be "tainted" by the OSM
> license if anybody not on that list ever modified it
significantly
Peter Miller wrote:
> I am basing my response of the Brief, not the current draft of ODBL (they
> are not that different except in the definition of a Derivative DB), however
> it would be my understanding that if you combined the OSM DB (unaltered)
> with another data-source (the PD one you refer
Andrew Williams wrote:
> I've been using my old N95 for a while now to get my GPS traces, but
> unfortunatly it's decided to finally give up. So, i'm in the market
> for a new GPS device. I'd preferebly like a standalone device
Someone is bound to say "eTrex Legend HCx" so let me be the first.
c
Ryszard Mikke wrote:
> Ummm... Why is that so? Does that mean that I can't use WikiMapia
> for it as well? Cause that is what I've actually done...
When you click Edit, and it says "1. Don't copy from other maps", it
really means it. It's not just there for decorative effect.
cheers
Richard
Gustav Foseid wrote:
> Is really placing a POI based on knowledge gained from other maps, anywhere
> near "copying"?
Entering "knowledge gained from other maps" is copying, yes.
Of course, one can, and ideally one should, take a liberal view and
say that expansionist views of copyright are ins
MJ Ray wrote:
> I won't because I don't want yet another bloody website password. I'm
> already scared of the amount of stuff I'll lose if my browser
> password store goes titsup. Isn't there an OpenID MediaWiki plugin?
cf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_AuthPlugin , in progress
ch
Jonathan Harley wrote:
> Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>>> It only says "you must also _offer_ to recipients" (my emphasis), not
>>> "you must provide in case anyone wants it" - it's like the GPL in
>>> tha
Gustav Foseid wrote:
> One should certainly not add information to OSM that is copyrighted,
> protected by database rights or otherwise protected. There is a difference
> between being careful and paranoid, however.
Yes. We're paranoid. Always have been, it's one of the things that
defines OSM.
Liz wrote:
> I don't want PD for my data because then I can see the company like
> Garmin
> freely using it to update their maps and still charging me for my
> data.
But this is what I never get when people wheel out the old canard of
"the tragedy of the commons". These days, the commons is
Rob Myers wrote:
> I had assumed it was a kind of stew. ;-)
Many a true word...
cheers
Richard
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Rob Myers wrote:
> I am not going to argue against the power of community, but Apple and
> bus companies and J. Random Enclosurer are not in the "community" as
> socially rather than legally constituted.
See, this is what I dislike - correction, this is one of several
things I dislike - about s
bvh wrote:
> If garmin closes their devices for non-garmin signed datasets (ala
> TomTom) then you could very well end up paying for the privilege to use
> your own data.
Sure, but that's an utterly different issue - that's an issue about
whether or not Garmin allows third-party maps to be inst
bvh wrote:
> Good luck steaming up community pressure for Apple opening up on stuff
> that they have taken from the PD. It is not going to happen.
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.5.5/
HTH :)
cheers
Richard
___
legal-talk mailing list
bvh wrote:
> Note that there is no pd-violations.org
/me blinks in astonishment
/me decides there really is nothing more he can bring to this party
Gustav was right. Let's talk OSM.
cheers
Richard
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
bvh wrote:
> My ideal license would force them to divulge their private GIS data
> on signal strength
Oh right. I just want to make a map.
cheers
Richard
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-ta
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
> I also have one in the centre of Sutton Coldfield. Think when I
> mapped it
> (ages and ages ago) I made it two separate ways which obviously
> isn't right.
> So interested to hear what people think.
+1. There's one in Worcester. Except it's labelled
SteveC wrote:
> CloudMade have some people experienced in Search Engine Optimisation
> and we'd like to offer their time to look at making OSM push higher up
> search results. Basically we think it would be nice that if you search
> for 'free maps' and things like that then OSM comes up to the top
Mark Williams wrote:
> The apostrophe is not correct anyway. It denotes a missed letter, in
> this word-position it would be 'doctor is', as opposed to the
> non-apostrophe version meaning 'belong to the the doctor' or plural
> doctors.
Heehee, don't get me started.
"doctor's" is the appropria
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Does the new license ever require my company to release the land use
> polygon data in the above scenario?
No.
> In essence my company would be "dual licensing" the road centerline
> data.
Indeed. Lots of us already dual-license our contributions to OSM:
http://wiki
Our lovely little mapping hobby is now so uber-successful that the
spammers have noticed it. A few more keep creeping through the net.
What should a spam-spotter do on noticing some spam?
I've pasted a few I've spotted here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Spam
but am unsure what to do
Tom Hughes wrote:
> A wiki admin can delete it properly, and block the account.
Hokay. I guess what I'm trying to ask is whether there's a procedure
(e.g. flagging spam on a wiki page, or category, which several people
can follow) which might reduce the inevitably OSM tendency for "the
way
Phooee, all these lists to choose from. Probably most sensible on
legal-talk, I think (so followups to there).
Erik Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You didn't read the whole sentence:
>>> ways that are contributed PD only,
Of c
80n wrote:
> Since street names are one of the harder bits of information to collect,
> what this user has done here looks like a very worthwhile contribution to
> the project.
>
> Perhaps we should even be encouraging users without GPS units to create this
> kind of topological map. It looks rea
Steve Chilton wrote:
> Amongst all the US Election mapping frenzy there was a good callout for
> OSM on Ogle Earth yesterday entitled:- OSM: your map of last resort
> http://www.ogleearth.com/index.html
via which I notice this:
http://googlemapsmania.blogspot.com/2008/11/wikimapia-beta-realtime-
Tom Chance wrote:
> This is what I always do, with one distinction: if it is a signposted road
> going into the estate, then I use highway=unclassified; if it is a service
> road running through the estate I use highway=service.
I like that as a general principle - the concept of "routeyness", if
Nic Roets wrote:
> Can we agree that a barrier=gate node implies that no traffic is
> allowed through unless it's enabled with tags like access=yes and
> foot=yes ?
Isn't the point of a gate that you can open it?
i.e. traffic is allowed through, but for routing purposes there's a
time pena
Ed Loach wrote:
> I wouldn't have said so. The point of tagging is a gate is to show
> there is a gate across a way. Examples I've seen so far include a
> gate beyond which is a service road for a supermarket (so
> permissions for the service road are down to who the keyholder is,
> gates across f
elvin ibbotson wrote:
> I once tried tagging a local river as a railway line. Nothing
> prevented me doing this. In the database it was (until I went back in
> and fixed it) a river AND
> a railway!
That's not too outlandish. No railways here, but lots of roads:
http://www.wetroads.co.uk/long.ht
Steve Chilton wrote:
> "OSM is a multifunctional cytokine produced by activated T lymphocytes
> and monocytes and shares properties with all the members of this
> family
> of proteins. OSM is structurally and functionally very similar to
> LIF."
We read the Observer on Sundays. Every month it
Mikel wrote:
> I'd suggest bypassing Trac and looking into RedMine
> http://www.redmine.org/
I'm not sure why the need to reuse existing software at all. Bugtracking is
the sort of thing you expect to find in 'Rails For Dummies' as My First
Rails App - if you’ve got a decent framework it’s pretty
Per-15 wrote:
> If you don't like smoothness invent a better scheme!
> Smoothness is better than nothing.
That's debatable (as well as, er, very_horrible).
Personally I believe the easiest and most flexible thing is just to extend
the access tags:
bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
so you'd g
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> I'm not sure why the need to reuse existing software at all. Bugtracking
>> is
>> the sort of thing you expect to find in 'Rails For Dummies' as My First
>> Rails App - if you’ve got a decent framew
Bernhard Zwischenbrugger wrote:
> In Vienna we have an event called "Friday Night Skating".
> Every week about 1000 Inline Skater meet at 10pm and skate on normal
> roads.
> The police blocks all the roads an it is possible to skate on roads that
> are for normal for cars only.
You can't design/
Robert Vollmert wrote:
> The obvious problem with this is the massive redundancy. You need to tag
> for every possible form of transport, or infer suitability for something
> exotic from the provided suitabilities.
Yes, infer, like we do with every other tag. People realised they didn't
need to t
Richard Bullock wrote:
> Perhaps Map Features should be for the main core tags only (for newbies
> mainly - the basics of how to get their road/feature displayed). Perhaps
> we
> should limit it to the things we consider important enough to render on
> the
> main renderers - and we can have oth
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Inventing your own stuff makes perfect sense in the area of your
> core competency.
Agreed absolutely.
> [...]
> I agree that where the bug tracker starts being used for mapping-
> related things, then the boundaries start to blur. But I'd still suggest
> that the only
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
>
>The trouble with that sort of thing, as compared to (ignore the actual
>tag names, they are just to give an idea):
>
>bicycle=yes
>bicycle:surface=poor
>
>(i.e. splitting
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> > if access==no or access==false then allowed=no else allowed=yes
>
> So basically, you have to decide that all unknown values default
> to either one or the other.
>
> If I'm a renderer, and I come across bicycle=
D Tucny wrote:
> The lack of history of a previous version would suggest that either
> there was no previous version and the way was created with existing
> nodes, or that potlatch removed the previous way and replaced
> it with a new way which due to some communication issue then
> potentiall
Dave Stubbs wrote:
> I like the clean relation data model, but find the addr:street
> thing much easier at the moment.
> Maybe I'll add an addressing button (sorry, I meant obscure
> keypress :-P) to Potlatch sometime then there'll be no excuses left.
When this accursed API 0.6 is out of the wa
Bernhard Zwischenbrugger wrote:
> Just an other slippy map:
> http://lamp2.fhstp.ac.at/~lbz/beispiele/ws2008/oomap4/index.php
>
> Maybe you like the zoom.
The thing I _really_ like is that it doesn't aggressively preload five
thousand miles round the edge every time, unlike OpenLayers (or, more
SteveC wrote:
> needs a simple "how to do addressing in potlatch" video a-la
> the old ones I did, as if you ignore relations it is essentially trivial
I'll be committing some new presets next week with all the fields ready and
waiting.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://w
Shaun McDonald wrote:
> It is a limitation of the 0.5 API.
> This problem is highly less likely to happen with 0.6 API, with
> the introduction of node/way/relation versioning and transactions.
Though it doesn't really need 0.6 to work, it just needs this bug fixing
(Dave, I think this is your
Till Harbaum wrote:
> The big show stopper with potlatch was that everything
> is stored in the database immediately, so you are always
> afraid to damage things.
Of course, patches are always welcome. :)
The sole reason Potlatch doesn't have such an (optional) feature right now
is that I haven
Andy, Frederik and Maning have really said all I could ever say.
Except that:
If you really wanted to help - even if you can't or won't code - you would
have submitted some trac tickets with suggestions, as many other people have
done. You would have attempted to understand before condemning.
Gr
Steven Le Roux wrote:
> Why not prefering to consider other solutions ? Why not downloading
> josm as a java web start app and give in the link the bbox from the
> browser ?
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2008-December/001204.html
is why.
Magically giving JOSM to newbies does
Ed Loach wrote:
> It is IE7 fully patched, and I'm guessing (as it doesn't always
> do it) that it is user error (me). It is probably that when I
> switch from one tab to the wiki tab and back that the way
> looks like it is still selected but in reality the flash bit
> doesn't have focus.
Ri
Gert Gremmen quoted me saying:
>> Andy, Frederik and Maning have really said all I could ever say.
and then answered:
> In other words:
> If you do not code: shutup !!
which is odd, because if you'd actually read my next sentence, you'd have
seen (emphasis added)
>> Except that:
>> If you rea
Ed Loach wrote:
> I find it annoying that sometimes I press Enter to stop
> editing a way, only for it to decide that I've clicked a link to
> take me elsewhere (user page, usually, I think) and I have
> to go back and repeat the last few edits.
Ugh, that's horrid. What browser are you using? Ot
Robert Vollmert wrote:
> With API 0.6, we'll notice when this happens, right?
Yeah, kind of - there'll be some form of conflict dialogue though with no
way to resolve it as yet, short of reloading the area. I don't really think
the API 0.6 people were thinking of Potlatch when they decided on th
D Tucny wrote:
> I think this would be an improvement, especially if you could view
> a list of changes that would be uploaded prior to upload...
Yep, see previous message about the only reason that not being an option is
that I haven't worked out a UI for it. :)
> One thing though that I don'
Ed Loach wrote:
> I think Potlatch has the advantage that you can switch from
> map view to edit mode easily for the area you are viewing,
> but once you've done that I still need to have an extra tab
> open for the wiki page to keyboard shortcuts
Once people have stopped ing around with t
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> Basically, you'll have to enter a brief description for every bunch
> of edits (just as you have to do when you update a wikipedia page)
> that you upload.
Strictly "have the option of entering", not "have to enter". Comments are
optional.
cheers
Richard
--
View
Peter Miller wrote:
> I think that would be an excellent idea, however don't assume transit
> authorities will always give you the data because they often won't for
> various reasons.
One of the wonderful things about ODbL is the concept of a collective work
as applied to separate databases.
John McKerrell wrote:
> Ah yes, you did mention that the other day. Surely it would only make
> the noise when you tried to unload the page though which wouldn't be
> so bad?
Well, the way it works at the moment (in sane browsers) is that Potlatch
sends a message via JS every time the dirty
Roman Neumüller wrote:
> And: the same idea might apply for potlatch's flash/yahoo image data!
> Wouldn't it be nice to have already downloaded images cached ?!?
Potlatch just uses the Yahoo API, it doesn't really do any further
fiddling[1] as that would be outwith the ToS and I prefer to tread
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> IIRC, you could catch the "onunload" event of the browser window
> via javascript and tell potlach. Yes, I know this should go to the
> -dev mailing list (and that patches are welcome, etc).
:) I posted about this the other day:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/piperm
Iván Sánchez Ortega-3 wrote:
> AFAIK, the 0.6 API requires a comment when opening a changeset (I might be
> wrong on this
You are. :)
The wiki doc just says "advised". There is no explicit reference to
"comment", or any other tag, within the changeset model or controller.
If you think through h
John McKerrell wrote:
> Try using the 'beforeunload' event, think this might work in IE.
(From memory, I haven't looked at this for a long while...)
It's not so much the JS that's the problem, it's the AS->JS communication.
Potlatch has to tell the JS whether or not there are unsaved changes.
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> Well, everybody knows that Potlach NEEDS a save button so
> it can ask the user for the comment.
Heh. It does ask the user for the comment if you manually close the
changeset.
Of course, if Potlatch did have a save button, there's nothing to say that
'save' needs
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Soundy overly complex compared to just using pdftotext and then
> parsing the resulting ASCII text, unless of course there's OCR
> involved which would rule out this approach.
Doesn't preserve the layout, in particular the columns, well enough. The UK
rail timetable PDF i
Shaun McDonald wrote:
> http://openstreetmap.org/browse/way/22359503/history looks like it is
> a 2 node way. Seems that there is a bug in Potlatch, causing it to not
> show the coastline here.
But the way contains the same node twice, thus is meaningless. That's not a
bug in Potlatch, that's
Thomas Wood wrote:
> In other news, I've converted the 12nm line around the UK and Ireland
> to be fully tagged, so it's now showing in its own bubble on the
> mapnik render.
Ugh. Can we (ping steve8) get some way of tagging this differently so it
_doesn't_ show? It looks really, really ugly.
ch
Roman Neumüller wrote:
> I occasioanlly open hires areas in JOSM when stumbling over
> them. Boy: what a whole bunch of errors one then starts to
> fix...! All potlatch-related I suppose (sorry Rich ;-)
I'd prefer (well, I would, wouldn't I) "all n00b-related". Blaming the editor is just neglect
Peter Miller wrote:
> Potlatch does sometime create duplicate ways for me when I
> splits features. These duplicates are invisible using Potlatch
> and the quantity of them varies from occasion to occasion.
This is a server issue more than anything else: it happens in times of
server slowness.
Marc Schütz wrote:
>> The solution is either to move splitting ways entirely to the server (so,
>> although the user hits 'split', the way isn't actually split until the
>> server returns a message), or to fix the server. I'd be interested to know
>> _why_ the server runs so slowly at certain time
Gert Gremmen wrote:
> POTLATCH NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Yeah, well spotted, genius. Where's your fucking patch?
Meanwhile - oh look, what's that on my screen? Fuck me if it isn't the
fucking Potlatch source. Maybe I'm improving the fucking thing.
http://www.systemeD.net/osm/screenshot.png
Maybe a fuc
Gert Gremmen wrote:
> Thank you Thomas,
>
> The image you provided to prove your solution
> was a complete surprise to me and may contribute to a
> solution for this everlasting Potlatch Critic.
>
> You are right, and I am right.
>
> My screen looks entirely different, due to the missed option
> (
Ted Mielczarek wrote:
> I went to look at an area I edited last week in the Mapnik
> rendering, and noticed it looked wrong. I thought maybe my edits
> hadn't been picked up somehow, so I looked at the data view on the
> slippy map. It matched the rendering. So I thought maybe Potlatch
> h
Erik Johansson wrote:
> PS. The current tools for change monitoring are actually only
> for spotting edits not changes, i.e. you don't see the changes
> people make only the new version they upload. Having a "see
> changes" would be nice
API 0.6 will enable the site to do a lot of this, if I'm
Phillip Barnett wrote:
> I believe Richard did the rectification for Potlatch and claims it to be
> better than JOSM's.
True for NPE but not for Yahoo - Potlatch just uses the standard Yahoo Flash
component, it doesn't do any extra fiddling around (well, other than a tiny
tweak to get the copyrig
brendan barrett wrote:
> It never hurts getting others to review things. You don't need
> to stop development on API 0.6 to do a review.
We are IMO too far down the road with API 0.6 to review the _design_. It is,
after all, mostly coded: you can check out the API 0.6 branch and use it
with JOSM,
Michal Migurski wrote:
> I'm hesitant to blow away the existing guide, but I wonder if it
> can be moved behind a disambiguation page? Something that
> lets you understand different levels of involvement: found a
> mistake, need to add a street, have a spreadsheet of local
> amenities, live in
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Who runs the NPE maps server? Nick Black? Another Nick?
nick.dev.openstreetmap.org is Nick Whitelegg, I think.
For NPE, however, JOSM should ideally use the 900913 tiles at
npe.openstreetmap.org, which are better rectified. Thomas, you were working
on a way for JOSM to a
Andy Allan wrote:
> Wait - who are you, and what have you done with RichardF?
I'm Fake SteveC. At least that's what people keep telling me.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> this will not be the case anymore with 0.6.
It's even better than that. When Potlatch asks the server for ways in the
current bounding box (which it does most times you pan or zoom), it'll ask
for the version, too. If there are any ways that have been recently revised,
it'l
Steven Le Roux wrote:
> Pieren will now largely diffuse his JOSM plugin for cadastre, and
> the work will be easier and quicker.
Is the source for this available anywhere? I'd like to see whether the
cadastre rasters could work as a Potlatch background. (I suspect the
projection would be the big
Frankie Roberto wrote:
> There also seems to be the Pennine Cycleway
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennine_Cycleway), which I've
> never seen signposted.
It's Sustrans National Route 68, the whole of which (well, except for two
alternative braids) is lovingly mapped on OSM, from Derby to
Berwi
Pieren wrote:
> Richard, we will contact you later if we see that Potlatch could add
> this as a WMS background. This would be really fantastic.
Great - look forward to it. And congratulations on getting the agreement.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing
Yay for 0.6 going live in March.
Can we take this opportunity to finally disable anonymous editing?
Potlatch has required non-anonymous editing since November 2007
(http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2007-November/020068.html
) to the grand total of precisely 0 complaints. If nothing
Peter Miller wrote:
> There is huge difference between the majority being ask one
> by one to 'relicense or leave now', and one where we are
> asked if we support it and then later being asked to accept
> the majority verdict (which is very likely to be in favour
> of re-licensing).
On refle
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> AFAIK by having the actual data under the evolving license you
> expose it to the sum of all the loopholes present in any
> version of the license as it evolved.
...is true, but rather pales into insignificance against the fact that
CC-BY-SA is almost certainly not v
201 - 300 of 1071 matches
Mail list logo
