Hi Warin
I would expect the highest order entity, the longest or biggest
entity, to be the primary name. For example the Hume Highway will
include a lot of High Streets, Station Streets or Main streets of
country towns. In my mind its first the Hume Highway and secondly High
Street
Hi Sebastian
Thanks for your input but I am not sure what you mean. Can you give a
bit more detail please?
Tony
Please don?t use Strava as your reference as to whether access is
permitted on a specific way as a lot of people do the wrong thing.
On 23 Apr 2024, at 4:25?PM,
Quoting Ben Ritter :
*Which publications are distributing maps of the areas in question that are
encouraging use of paths tagged with `access=no`?* I am interested in
collecting any and all examples.
Not sure about this one but
Way: Road 30 (569541638)
access=no
Edited 10 months ago by VicWM
Quoting Ben Ritter :
...
*Which publications are distributing maps of the areas in question that are
encouraging use of paths tagged with `access=no`?* I am interested in
collecting any and all examples.
Hi Ben
Strava seems to be not respecting private.
Thanks Adam, well put.
There are two groups, both trying to be of service to the wider
community. The mappers trying to build better maps and land managers
trying to protect and manage public land well.
If a land manager sees mappers not respecting their decisions about
managing public
Hi Mark
I would not offer Parks the option of a life cycle prefix until Parks
recognizes that this comes with an obligation to maintain the ex-path
in a disused, deconstructed or demolished state. I don't think that
Parks has to be perfect in this, the the path might be illegally
Hi
Its OK by me. The park ranger who appears to be most connected to this
has been contacted and invited into our discussion. What more can we do?
Its unfortunatee that a slow motion edit war will be the likely outcome.
Tony
In that case, should I go ahead now with the revert?
Mark P.
No, nothing that I have heard.
Tony
Just following up on this - has there been any further input from
National Parks regarding these paths?
Mark P.
On 3 Jan 2024, at 3:28â¯pm, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Hi
I was able to talk to the Parks ranger for this park. He identified
Hi
I was able to talk to the Parks ranger for this park. He identified
himself as Patrick and I have his calling phone number which I would
share off list.
He identified himself as having deleted trails from Open Street Map.
But that does not necessarily mean they are the same trails
and see if
it helps get Parks Victoria to appoint a Liaison Officer.
Tony Forster
Friends of Lysterfield Park
Thanks everybody for your thoughts.
As per Steve's comment, here is probably the easiest contact point due to
not needing an account, but we'll see what other suggestions are made
Hi Graeme
I have not seen anything indicating Strava removes ways from heat
maps. Way 1033069444 was removed by lifecycle prefix on 1 September.
Its heat trace is still there. I expect it to fade as it is used less
and finally disappear.
Tony
Yes Ewen, I agree
The OSM mission statement is at
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Mission_Statement
I would like to see it also include something like Google's "donât be evil"*
Or doctors' "first, do no harm" or "primum non nocere"
Tony Forster
* Google chan
Forster
Friends of Lysterfield Park
Hi Folks,
Personally, I believe if the managing agency requests that the
tracks be removed from the map then as good corporate citizens we
should do everything possible to lower the promotion of such tracks.
Track managers also have a responsibility
Hi
I am satisfied that it is a cache issue. The ways have not been edited
for 3 days and bicycle (graphhopper) which was doing the little zig
zag yesterday is now routing correctly.
I think just wait and let the data catch up.
Tony
Ben, thanks for the suggestions - I'll give them a go.
Ian
Looking again at the routing:
1. Continue onto Menang Drive20m
2. Keep right onto Menang Drive130m
3. Turn sharp left onto Albany Highway20m
4. Turn sharp right onto Menang Drive160m
5. Arrive at destination
Its like
Yes Ian
I think you are right. It was showing the cached copy even now with
the kink. I just refreshed it. The routing is still wrong
1. Continue onto Menang Drive 20m
2. Keep right onto Menang Drive 130m
3. Turn sharp left onto Albany Highway 20m
4. Turn
Hi
Sorry if this is my misunderstanding but it seems that the same
mistake that is made by the routers is being made by some tile
rendering engines too. The standard tile has a kink at the end of
Menang Drive (1077469021) which is not there. The cycleOSM tile
renderer does not do this.
Hi
Am I missing something? I looked at way 952248376 and found a user
Pieseczek with 2 changesets and 4 new ways over a year old. If there
was any reference to Strava heat maps then I missed it. Is there any
indication whether Pieseczek is resident in Australia apart from the
likely
Hi Rob
A warm welcome to you and the Department of Transport to OSM (just
speaking for myself, one of over 8 million contributors.)
Its an exciting time for me to be an OSM contributor as OSM is
becoming the preferred map for so many.
Sorry if I have missed something but this post
Hi Rob
A warm welcome to you and the Department of Transport to OSM (just
speaking for myself, one of over 8 million contributors.)
Its an exciting time for me to be an OSM contributor as OSM is
becoming the preferred map for so many.
Sorry if I have missed something but this post
Hi
Looking further City of Sydney Data Hub is licenced CC By 4.0 but OSM
has been waiting on the waiver since 2020 "CC BY 4.0 - waiver sent
01/12/2020, "considering your request" on 03/12/2020"
The licence for the cycle network data links to 2 logos, a CC by 4.0
logo and a "Open Data"
Hi
First check that its listed at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources
If not ykou probably need to get them to sign a release
Tony
Hi all,
I have been looking into cycle paths data in OSM and found that Sydney
doesn't seem to have this dataset:
Hi all
Gravel was discussed on talk_au back in March 2021. For anybody
interested its back in discussion at
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/surface-fine-gravel-is-it-for-loose-gravel-or-duplicate-of-surface-compacted/7533/3
Tony
___
You could contact PhuLai's supervisor
Dr Qiang He
Associate Professor
q...@swin.edu.au
+61 3 9214 5431
As these tags are few in number and associated with research as
mentioned on the github page I am happy to leave as is and move on.
The tag power=edge_server seems reasonable.
On 3 Nov
Hi Sebastian
It is both frustrating and disappointing to see that you continue to
argue your point of view that is incorrect.
It is clear that a local council who follows the Victorian road laws
has published the permissions of ways within their jurisdiction yet
you still try to argue
Hi Sebastian
You sent me private message, 15/10/22 20:52:39 EST.
In it you agreed that consensus had been achieved even though you
thought it was wrong.
I was disappointed to then see further tagging changes which in my
opinion go against community consensus.
Changeset: 127828054
Hi Sebastian
I thank you again for your many contributions to OSM.
I note your deeply held belief that your tagging is the correct
interpretation of Victorian law, however for the purposes of OSM, its
the community consensus that ultimately matters.
I undertook in Changeset: 126886850 to
Hi
The Mapillary is partially processed, it may not appear on the
worldmap yet but hopefully this link gives access to the sequence of
photos
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-38.150390215353=145.29166281667995=16.813496063643257=681595696442544=photo
Tony
Sebastian wrote
Sebastian wrote
This was had no visible sign to indicate it was a shared way but it is
tagged as a shared way in OSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903736648#map=17/-38.15145/145.29173
I replied
I would not change the tags till I had been out on site and I would
take Mapillary images.
Hi Sebastian
I want to draw you attention to an example I can across today. This
was had no visible sign to indicate it was a shared way but it is
tagged as a shared way in OSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903736648#map=17/-38.15145/145.29173
Can I get peoples opinion when it is
Sebastian
Yes, 3b and 3c are actually signposted. They were intended as
hypothetical examples. I asked the question of Ben to get a better
undersranding of what he thought rather than to support any particular
argument. I should have explained this in more detail and apologise
for any
Hi Sebastian Azagra,
Thank you for joining in the discussions. Michael Collinson wrote "I
continue to welcome him (Sebastian) in our OSM community". I second
that. Though I have some problems with your bicycle edits, I am very
appreciative of the hard work you do to support OSM.
I have
Hi
I have been monitoring the edits by a user who still "changes shared
paths to footpaths as no signs present to indicated bikes are
permitted" in Victoria Australia.
Most of these changes are small ways where there are unlikely to be
serious consequences, its not worth the petrol (or
Hi Brendan
Firstly Background:
It took a while but I got the OSM attribution right at
https://engage.vic.gov.au. In the process a representative of
engage.vic said words to the effect that the state government was a
strong supporter of open source and open data. I read that that the
Hi all
A good news story on OSM attribution. The map at
https://engage.vic.gov.au/CardiniaCkParklands now shows copyright
OpenStreetMap. They say it will be right on all maps displayed on
Engage Victoria. They were glacially slow but we got the results in
the end.
They stressed the
And I also reported another attribution error:
From: Mapbox Support
To: Forster
Reply-To: Mapbox Support
Subject:Mapbox Support - we received your message
Thanks for contacting Mapbox Support! We've received your message. If
you have an emergency or see a disruption
Oops mapbox not matchbox
Hi
A related case, the Victorian government seems to be using OSM without
attribution. Again it is Matchbox. I have written to the government a
couple of times, the replies have been polite but no result, i think
its just too hard for them. If talking to Matchbox,
Hi
A related case, the Victorian government seems to be using OSM without
attribution. Again it is Matchbox. I have written to the government a
couple of times, the replies have been polite but no result, i think
its just too hard for them. If talking to Matchbox, please mention
this one.
Hi list
the discussions around the correct modeling of a motorway/divided
highway intersection continue at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120498123
If you can offer suggestions, your help is welcome
Tony
Using the tag the tag highway = cycleway indicates that the route is
Hi Ian
I did not edit Bush Walking and Cycling Tracks
only Footpath Cycling
Bush Walking and Cycling Tracks
contains ... controversial information. See the talk page. This page
has been archived as part of the Australian wiki cleanup
I wonder where that controversial material has gone?
Yes
Hi
I have edited
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Footpath_Cycling
(1) to record the different international English uses of footpath,
pavement and sidewalk
(2) to give photographic examples as a base for discussion.
Not intending to redefine anything,
Hi all
I flagged the list of changes below that Sebastian may still dispute,
mostly I have reverted his changes without reaching an agreement.
Changeset 120382941 MacRobertson bridge is definitely disputed by him.
Can I add changeset/120498123, it is early days on this one and
Sebastian
Hi Kim
Can I please clarify "using highway=cycleway should only be used where
there are signs allowing"?
Does this apply to just sidewalks (US sidewalk, UK pavement, AU
footpath) or all paths including paths through parkland, beside
freeways, rivers and railway lines?
Thanks
Tony
Hi all
I was hoping that Sebastian would post to this list but so far, no.
The following may still be disputed by Sebastian.
120963296 what is the information source?
120621671 changes as no signs present but signage exists
120382941 MacRobertson bridge approach - changes as no signs present
Hi Sebastian and list
Today I did a number of edits relating to whether a lack of bicycle
signage, on its own, is sufficient grounds to remove
bicycle=yes/designated or cycleway. Most of my edits though relate to
cases where there is signage that had not been noticed by an editor.
I
Hi Sebastian,
You say "The re-tagging of ways I have been undertaking aligns with
the Australian Tagging guidelines". I think you are referring to the
words "Cycling is not permitted on footpaths in NSW or Vic.,
and highway=footway should be used in general circumstances."
I think you
Thanks Warin, pedantic mode is appreciated, but what position do you
support? Presumably leave a path as a path and do not change it to a
footway?
Tony
Bicycles are allowed on footpaths in Victoria  . . .
if rider has a medical or other exemption allowing them to ride on the
Hi Sebastian
Thanks for participating in this discussion.
You say "Hence by definition in Victoria, bikes aren't explicitly
permitted without signage".
This is the area where we disagree and I believe you are out of step
with the consensus. There are many places where bikes are implicitly
Hi Sebastian and list
I went out to Changeset: 118627943 and took photos. It is my belief
that a short section of bike route through park should be cycleway.
Sebastian disagrees, his changeset comment follows.
Comment from HighRouleur about 5 hours ago
From the Mapillary info provided,
Hi Sebastian and list,
2) are cycle routes cycleways or footways, specifically Changeset: 118627943
I have provided a link to my photos and labeled the main ones at
Changeset: 118627943
I believe that way 671174716 should be split in 2, the eastern part
appears to be the footpath, there
Hi Sebastian
There are 4 issues in play
1) changing to footway when not signed otherwise
2) are cycle routes cycleways or footways, specifically Changeset: 118627943
3) access=destination
4) Way: 679145843
1) Sebastian, your changing shared ways and cycleways to footways when
there are no
Dear list Im tired and muddled. I think Sebastian posted swapped the 2
issues when he posted, sorry if its my mistake
Quoting fors...@ozonline.com.au:
Hi Sebastian
A quick reply now, its late, and maybe more considered tomorrow
its tagged highway=track
I can see no "access all=yes" so
Hi all, I see Sebastian has posted to the list now
background to this: Way History: 679145843
about a year ago Sebastian had bicycle=no, highway=track
as part of the DWG sanctioned revert I deleted the bicycle=no
Hi Sebastian
a bit more,
If I wanted to add tags I would go on site have a look
Hi Sebastian
access=privateAccess is only with permission on an individual basis
access=destinationTransit traffic forbidden
access=permissive open to general traffic until such time as the
owner revoke the permission
My inclination is that if you are not sure, don't use the
Hi
Sound like destinations, not road names. Is destination=* suitable?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
Tony
Have spotted 2 notes concerning what names should be added to functional
roads around airports (& other places would have similar).
Hi
I have left a changeset comment alerting him to the talk-au discussion.
Tony
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 10:22, wrote:
Then there are networks that are clearly signed indicating Transit
traffic is forbidden. These are the only places I would use the
access=destination tag.
Have I got it
oops, forgot to add these
Multiple entrances with restricting signage
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.83471/145.03179 (Scotch College)
Multiple entrances gated and signed (Museum, Carlton Gardens)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209893402
Multiple entrances gatedand signed
Hi all
Up to now I have only questioned Sebastian (HighRouleur) on his
information sources and reasoning on the use of access=destination
First going to the wiki: "Transit traffic forbidden, all non-transit
traffic to a given element allowed."
But I am aware that the wiki does not trump
Hi Andrew. Here is a summary of HighRouleur's edits since your DWG
ruling of Mon Oct 4.
Can you, representing the DWG, please persuade HighRouleur to conform
to community mapping practices.
Thanks Tony
Changeset: 112406847 12 October. Footpath incorrectly identified as
shared path. Changed
Hi Graeme
"Illegally constructed trail bike tracks", so
possibly just tagging it as motor_vehicles=private, foot & bikes=yes, would
solve it?
No, I don't think so.
Its a trail bike track so its probably too narrow for cars,
motor_vehicles=private seems irrelevant
foot & bikes=yes, It sounds
Graeme
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2788602#map=15/-33.7227/150.6317
Contact the land manager, if the land manager can make a serious job
of closing the track to traffic then it might be OK to use a lifecycle
prefix, there are a few to choose from.
case. There is a lot of discussion
on talk-au regarding your edits. I suggest you read it and respond.
Please let us know whether you agree with the 6 step process and if you
do not agree, your reasons.
Thanks
Tony Forster
__
Yep
Hi community
I have written to Aaron by changeset comment, wiki user_talk page and
through this list. I am awaiting his reply.
1 get community support from talk au for this process
2 Contact Aaron and get his agreement
3 Thorsten rolls back the wiki to an agreed state
4 Dian tidies up the
/pipermail/talk-au/
This is your opportunity to put your case. There is a lot of
discussion on talk-au regarding your edits. I suggest you read it and
respond. Please let us know whether you agree with the 6 step process
and if you do not agree, your reasons.
Thanks
Tony Forster
Hi all
Can I suggest the following
1 get community support from talk au for this process
2 Contact Aaron and get his agreement
3 Thorsten rolls back the wiki to an agreed state
4 Dian tidys up the wiki
5 Aaron does not edit the wiki until Dian has finished
6 we do not call for DWG intervention
Thanks Phil, speaking for myself, I am very happy for you to take the
lead. The reason I suggest writing aaronsta a letter is that the DWG
would prefer us to exhaust all avenues of engagement before calling
them in.
I don't think we (the OSM community) have been particularly good at
Hi
I'm riding my bike in country Vic and can't do it but
Can someone please write him a polite letter outlining our concerns
and requesting that he agree to a revert and undertake to provide
adequate changeset descriptions and to reply to comments and consult
before large edits.
If we
Graeme
Yes, he has made big changes to the documentation and the map. The
same 2 issues apply to both, some of the changes are contrary to
community expectations and changes of such scale should be made after
consultation. I believe he is acting in good faith but his balance
between
Sorry,
The 2 examples I mentioned, river side and on ramps were not deleted.
Tony
Hi
I am looking at the map as if a cyclist visitor to Perth. I am using
Osmand with the bike routes highlighted feature turned on. I presume
the highlighted routes are the same ones that are being talked about. I
Hi
I am looking at the map as if a cyclist visitor to Perth. I am using
Osmand with the bike routes highlighted feature turned on. I presume
the highlighted routes are the same ones that are being talked about.
I can't be sure. The highlights look useful and I would use them. They
pick
Probably
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aaronsta
Who is Aaronsta?
Is it anyone participating in this mailing list?
Have any of these changes been discussed somewhere?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Tagging_Guidelines
Overpass query for Cradle Mountain National Park
It all just appears to show orange path, with no red footway?
No, Phil's query works for me, there is very little footway so its
hard to see at low zoom. I changed the colours from red and orange to
blue and green and its a bit better
Tony
Mmm, certainly bikes are banned on walking tracks (they are classified as
vehicles in tas and need to stick to 'roads')
Hi
This sounds a bit like the issue a couple of months ago with the User
who wanted to tag all footpaths in Victoria with bicycle=no and the
community consensus was that
Hi
Out in the middle of nowhere I would use path unless there was an
explicit prohibition of bicycles.
But I could be wrong
Tony
Thanks folks,
OK ? It would be good to clarify that as the vast majority of the
?bushwalking? track network in Tasmania is path but I am also seeing
ighway> highway=
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath> path, but
the walking track page mentions that tag regularly ? what is the
differentiation?
From: Andrew Harvey
Sent: Monday, 24 January 2022 10:54 PM
To: talk OSM Australian List
Cc: Tony Forster ; n
thanks for compiling the walking tracks page ...
It would be good to extend this later on to have separate pages
for walking tracks, vehicle tracks and MTB paths, since these issues keep
coming up on the forum.
Good idea, ...
Vehicle tracks should be less controversial and easier. MTB paths is
Hi Nev
I am encouraged by Guy's response. If Parks NSW can be persuaded to
funnel all/most such map changes through one person like Guy it could
be good.
Invite him to join talk-au so he can understand why illegal tracks are
such a difficult problem for Parks and OSM.
Eventually it
Ian
I showed my friends, their response was: "when do we start?"
Tony
Hi folks, for everyone interested in OpenStreetMap's fantastic road dataâ¦
I've just posted a series of blogs about unsealed roads in Victoria. I've
pitched it at cyclists rather than mappers to widen the audience, but
Hi all
You may recall our discussions with HighRouleur and tagging bicycle=no.
I have noticed another user flushmainac with a similar editing
pattern. flushmainac is quite open that they are editing as part of a
quest, Wanderer.Earth
I checked 3 of flushmainac's edits this afternoon that
Hi all
A similar problem with a nature walk,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360672204 it appears to be
unconnected to anything.
In reality it is leading off a mown picnic area. What is rendering
green there is the natural=wood. Maybe that wood should be converted
to a relation with
Hi
If you have rights to that photo and you are going to tag
highway=emergency_access_point its worth putting the photo on the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point
As you say with a 3 letter prefix PBM010 it looks like it was intended
at some stage
Phil
Good idea, totally off topic but, go to
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.9088066=145.3647858=17=246259583949249=photo and press
play
you get an animation of Puffing Billy crossing the historic trestle
bridge at Selby. Sorry I didn't see any markers but someone with more
Further
If the marker looks the same as the bottom photo of
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point
then the dataset is
https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/esta-emergency-markers/resource/44add10f-a478-4ab0-a6fa-227493663b28
Tony
Hi
This subject was discussed
Hi
This subject was discussed in October.
The dataset they are sharing is likely to be
https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/esta-emergency-markers/resource/44add10f-a478-4ab0-a6fa-227493663b28
and it was determined that we do not have the right licence to use this data.
I say likely to be the same
Hi
My impression in Victoria is that the chain fitting and chains
required locations move up and down the mountain with the weather and
that there's very little that can be mapped.
Tony
Hi all,
For the NSW and Victorian snowfield mappers, user Trapicki has submitted a
comprehensive snow
Quoting Simon Poole :
PS: wondering why Gruyere has that name.
Good question.
The town is named for a variety of cheese, as the area's history is in
the dairy industry. Cahillton Post Office first opened on 20 August
1892. It was renamed Gruyere in 1950 and closed in 1960
Wikipedia
Tony
Displaying a closed trail on a map (like OSM) does NOT cause people
to navigate that trail. Such behavior is completely up to the
individual who "concludes" from reading said map "hey, I'm going to
hike that closed trail anyway." (Bzzzt; fail, human logic).
OSM is not responsible for
Thanks Dian
Your tagging suggestion might work, I'll suggest it to Parks Vic,
Lysterfield next week.
Tony
I think you've struck the central issue here: if it is on the ground,
it will get mapped again, and again and again by editors who think that
the path is merely missing, not
Hi Frederik, Thorsten
1. "a park manager would prefer them not to, and therefore deletes the
track in order to keep people from exercising their rights".
Does this happen, has it ever happened? I would be surprised if it
happened here. Anyway its not what I thought we were talking about,
Hi all
This also came up in 2015,
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2015-July/010619.html
The consensus, which I was not happy with, was "if it exists then map it".
I volunteer with a park Friends Group and see things more from a Parks
Service perspective. There are usually
Hi
Is there any chance, or point, of including
https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/esta-emergency-markers in an ambit
request?
Tony
Hi Andrew, yes, happy to take it on. Is there a template for data
requests online somewhere that explains why the waiver is needed,
that I can use as an
Not sure how much we can trust any of these. I assume these markers are
visible signs/posts at the roadside and can be surveyed?
Adam
Adam
Sorry for the delay.
Yes, they are visible signs/posts at the roadside and can be surveyed.
I have put a photo of one in Victoria Australia at
Hi
I think that, because its a emergency marker, its important to get it right.
Its a HighRouler edit so we will have to decide what, if anything, to
do with it. Its been at London Bridge for 12 years, recently moved to
a point 100m north. But I am not allowed to "know" that the two
Hi
I want to put the emergency marker MOR507 where I think it belongs
MOR507 node=429407299
not London Bridge (in either of its two recent locations)but
LATITUDE-38.473502 LONGITUDE 144.92752 Bushrangers Bay car park
Is
PS
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue
Thanks Ben
Where can we get source material for Victorian State Forests,
National Parks etc?
Regards
Andrew Parker
?Get BlueMail for Android ?
On 18 Oct 2021, 09:23, at 09:23, Ben Kelley wrote:
Hi.
We need to be very
Hi
"Where can we get source material for Victorian State Forests"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Resources
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Imports
Tony
Thanks Ben
Where can we get source material for Victorian State Forests,
National Parks etc?
Hi Andrew
Speaking as another relatively inexperienced editor, don't be too
disheartened.
"I used MapShareVic" It takes a bit of getting used to but OSM is very
fussy about allowable sources. There are good arguments for why. It
can be frustrating when you have a perfectly good source
Yes Andrew
I would be happy to work with you. We are still under a 15km limit,
probably going to a 25km limit in 2 weeks. I can get to maybe half of
the area now for ground truthing and probably 90% in 2 weeks.
Tony
I guess there would be nearly 0% chance that you would be able to cleanly
Hi all
There are 15,000 changes to consider over 651 changesets
Does this sound OK? Start reversions at his #641
Revert in this order:
Sebastian's Changeset #comment
641 112030682#Changing shared paths to foothpaths
640 111889860#updates to cycling permission
639 111889673
Adam
Spotting these
and knowing how far back to revert to might be tricky I guess?
eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47771844/history
Yes. I have never been involved in a reversion so complex and it
worries me too. I presume they should be reverted in reverse date
order, ie most recent
1 - 100 von 189 matches
Mail list logo