On 25/09/2024 22:24, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
On 25/09/2024 21:44, Chris Pankhurst via Talk-GB wrote:
I am looking at a junction in London where I am not clear whether a u-
turn is allowed or not. The location the junction between Edgeware
Road and Praed Street and Chapel Street
nding on the city, region, etc.
I can't think of any reason why city or region would make any sort
of difference - traffic rules are the same everywhere and any local
traffic order prohibiting u-turns would have to be reflected in
standard signage to be effective.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
e:
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=21279378&class=place
Well it doesn't for me. Do you have your browser languages set to
prefer Latin or something (that's the name:la for the UK relation).
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@c
Tue, 1 Dec 2020, at 9:41 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
If we assume that a new copyright is created by the scanning (which is
a complicated question) then there is no way it expires next year.
What exactly do you think the term is for this copyright and when do
you think it starts from?
I don't
mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
_
less the start or end point is on the flare why would a
router do that over the shorter route on the roundabout... I mean
maybe there are a few cases where the flare is shorter somehow?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Tal
inst anybody turning off which should exclude it from
any consideration by a router?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hopefully I've fixed them on TW for the next update.
Tom
On 16/09/2020 12:44, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
That would be because somebody on TranslateWiki has added a bunch
of bogus strings to the en-GB translation:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/c
streetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
nto
the harbour:
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0278/1529/products/OCB-1179.jpg
Mark
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
__
hway-code
BCC to DWG because of the impact in cycle routing.
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 14/03/2020 11:37, Dan S wrote:
Op za 14 mrt. 2020 om 11:20 schreef Tom Hughes via Talk-GB
:
On 14/03/2020 11:13, Rob Nickerson wrote:
As may have seen in Simon's response it sounds like we currently lack
list moderators. If this is something you would like to do please email
this ma
wner and discuss the situation
with them before attempting a putsch.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
__
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
sts.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
; says "open data" to you?
What it says to me is "copyright for 50 years from the end of
the year when it was published" so unless there is some license
allowing it's use then no, it can't be used.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
_
On 19/07/2019 14:17, David Woolley wrote:
On 19/07/2019 13:37, Tom Hughes wrote:
I would say the logical consequence of that argument is that no road
should be mapped as tertiary, as, unless taken from OS, it is a
subjective judgement and can't be consistently verified.
That doesn
ed
between tertiary, unclassified and residential on a more subjective
basis.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
istinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
o post.
Could someone with moderator abilities take a look please?
Done, but for future reference he will find it works a lot better
if he subscribes to the list first...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB maili
tham Cross should be somewhere below
Cheshunt and west of Waltham Abbey.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Ta
outlandish ideas I've heard in OSM tagging circles, and that's
saying a lot.
To be fair "addr:city=Chipping Norton" would be outlandish even for
an address *in* Chipping Norton...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
is a simplified algorithmic transformation but a fully
accurate conversion requires the OSTN02 data.
I'm not sure what the current status is but they certainly used
to claim various IP rights over it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
On 18/01/2019 09:49, Brian Prangle wrote:
Has anyone else noticed problems with edits failing to render?. Stuff I
did 2 days ago still not showing up
Replication had stalled on one of the render servers - it is catching
up now but will take a few hours to get everything.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
er area that is OSQA.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
r this will have any correlation with Land
Registry. I'm guessing .gov isn’t that joined up.
Cheers
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@comp
s ago).
I solicited some local intelligence:
https://twitter.com/jonobennett/status/1065232930883145728
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
and that is marked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25365715
Because that is the only vehicular access to the area it has the effect
of controlling traffic in the whole area.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing l
__
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
it's a stupid idea, so please don't...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ode a particular building has.
I am not bulk adding these (I do not have the technical knowledge or
time) I am just adding postcodes to properties as I add them.
So how are you working out which postcode to use? Sometimes it is
fairly obvious from the centroid location but it often isn't.
Tom
--
On 03/11/2018 15:50, Colin Smale wrote:
The coastline ways with source=PGS are really old and inaccurate. I am
not sure of their exact provenance but I think they were traced from
some primitive aerial imagery.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:source%3DPGS
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
f on the edge but I think
that village is what I would probably go with.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
t have the "Avenue" at all:
https://maps.compton.nu/view#18/50.82039/-0.13968/os2500
https://maps.compton.nu/view#18/50.82039/-0.13968/os1250
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
aking an object worse.
That's what makes it so hard.
That said I will certainly agree that what you're doing is far better
than what many companies trying to get their clients locations into OSM
have done in the past.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
_
real world they are often anything
but.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
#x27; page) is there any reason we can't do such imports
without discussion with/permission from the company concerned?
Just a small thing called copyright and/or database right.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Tal
tps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
stcode has been invented by using some
algorithm to draw a polygon that happens to encapsulate all those
delivery points.
Depending on the algorithm that may or may allow for overlapping
polygons and in general you may get different answer depending on the
details of the algorithm used.
Tom
-
On 30/08/17 10:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
As best I can tell from wikipedia the new bridge is the M90 and under
motorway conditions with the old bridge presumably expected to carry
non-motorway traffic as the A9000.
So from
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-41086779 it
ected to carry
non-motorway traffic as the A9000.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
responses.
Mostly these seem to be id edits so I'm guessing perhaps a University course
or something.
I suspect Pokemon Go is a more likely explanation.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstre
el.
Yes I was just saying earlier today at SotM that I'd dearly love to get
hold of the historical boundary data that Vision of Britain has but
chooses for some reason only to make available to people with an
academic affiliation
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@comp
instead of just entering the file name. It is very
irritating and demotivating :-( Editing OSM already takes too much of my
time.
I think it is your browser that has changed, not us.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
Who can be contacted to see if this can be reinstated?
I think Grant is already aware if you're talking about URL parameters.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstre
? How should they be tagged?
I suggest barge=concrete ;-)
Not that I had any trouble believing you could make ships out of
concrete or anything when I first heard about them as a teenager.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
5 million is just to work out what they might do not to
actually do it ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
towns and
villages without any town or parish council.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
there to which he and possibly
some other OSMers gave evidence.
Certainly in general we have a particularly active community in the
Nottingham area so it's always worth talking to them about any local issues.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compt
On 30/12/15 18:26, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 30/12/2015 18:09, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 30/12/15 17:04, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 03/01/2015 17:47, Tom Hughes wrote:
They changed the URL for that layer recently when they merged the
separate England+Wales and Scotland layers for the 2nd edition 6 inch
On 30/12/15 17:04, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 03/01/2015 17:47, Tom Hughes wrote:
They changed the URL for that layer recently when they merged the
separate England+Wales and Scotland layers for the 2nd edition 6 inch
maps into one layer. I've updated the wiki, but this should work:
tms:http:
n some way.
If we did try and map it to sub-B classifications then we would probably
have to do it on a per-authority basis as each authority has it's own
classification scheme below B.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
treatment I wonder?
Should we have a French style and a US style and a Chinese style and...
I mean how exactly do you propose to decide which national styles should
get special treatment?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
On 14/09/15 11:24, Lester Caine wrote:
On 14/09/15 11:11, Tom Hughes wrote:
Broxbourne, Wormley and Turnford don't really have significant centres
and historically would likely have been considered villages. Broxbourne
is now a town in wikipedia with a population of over 13 thousand whil
On 14/09/15 10:39, Lester Caine wrote:
On 14/09/15 09:51, Tom Hughes wrote:
Hell, try http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/1009 where I now live
which wasn't even a parish in it's own right until 1844 but was almost
certainly considered a town before that, as a coaching stop o
t between the parishes of Broxbourne and Great
Amwell, neither of which has a significant high street, while it has has
a market charter wince 1253 and has a high street which clearly dates
back some centuries.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
__
d half of the 20th century
without necessarily growing in other ways.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
http://geo.nls.uk/mapdata2/os/25_inch/surrey/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
http://geo.nls.uk/mapdata2/os/25_inch/sussex/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
http://geo.nls.uk/mapdata2/os/25_inch/buckingham/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
http://geo.nls.uk/mapdata2/os/25_inch/london/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton
company number
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Main_Page
Does anyone have any suggestions or will I just have to pay the VAT
OSMF is not a charity, so there is no charity number.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
t we normally use to
record names erroneously asserted in official sources.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
nally be able
to find postcodes when I type them in?
Why would it make any difference? As far as I know Nominatim already
uses the Codepoint Open data?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Ta
L for that layer recently when they merged the
separate England+Wales and Scotland layers for the 2nd edition 6 inch
maps into one layer. I've updated the wiki, but this should work:
tms:http://nls-{switch:0,1,2,3}.tileserver.com/os_6_inch_gb/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpg
Tom
--
Tom Hu
On 13/11/14 09:52, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 13/11/14 09:42, Lester Caine wrote:
Silly question ...
Just been looking at a local note and I'm a little curious as to what
differentiates text appearing with a purple dot on a building and the
more normal brown text on surrounding buildings?
ering, this is confusing things at times.
Well if you told us where on the map you were looking so that we could
see for ourselves then it would be a lot easier to comment...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
e "outward postcode"
and "inward postcode" and the outward postcode combined with the leading
digits from the inward give you a "postal sector".
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mail
post town
is Crewkerne.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
st 24 hours are anything to do by:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Math1985/history
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
a but I
don't think they should be included in everyday renderings - they are
something that belong on specialist renderings for specialist uses of
the sort you mentioned.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Tal
k the data to
make it do what you want. Aside from anything else it might affect other
apps routing decisions in entirely different ways.
There is a well defined meaning to trunk/primary/secondary for UK roads
so please use it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
g Name
and probably:
addr:street=Something Technology Park
assuming that the technology park is actually a road, or collection or
roads, that comes off Other thing Road.
eg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123243789
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.n
On 03/08/14 17:02, Tom Hughes wrote:
See, for example:
http://www3.lancashire.gov.uk/corporate/atoz/a_to_z/service.asp?u_id=1065&tab=3&siteid=5409&pageid=29027&e=e
http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn00402.pdf is also informative.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@
tmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
t...@openstreetmap.org <mailto:t...@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@op
twenty years now and to date nobody has managed to come up
with an answer that makes everybody happy so I suggest we don't try and
do so here and now.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Ta
On 08/06/14 23:11, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 8 June 2014 22:49, Tom Hughes wrote:
There's an almost infinite number of things we could add, but if nobody ever
uses them, is the time take do so wasted?
Why do you (apparently) suppose they will not be used?
I don't suppose one way or
.
I was taking the question of accuracy as a given.
My point was not whether we can accurately add the right tags, but
rather whether doing so is actually useful.
There's an almost infinite number of things we could add, but if nobody
ever uses them, is the time take do so wasted?
T
could then be
replicated for more topics; and in other territories.
What would you consider a "demonstration of success" exactly?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap
treet has three postcodes. One covers both
sides for about one third of the length and the other two each cover one
side for the other two thirds.
Postcodes are part of an address and belong to a building, not a street,
so that is where they should be tagged.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@c
the splits are.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
er:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing li
inately though, the "Should normally have a population
of at least 100,000 people and be larger than nearby place=towns" rule.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
ht
f "for
the renderer" going on here too.
Well there is a close correspondence between the agree meaning of city
as the largest/most important places and what places people would expect
to show up first on the map so while it may be mapping
be similar across the globe so we need to find a local way in
each area to define what a tag means so that meaning does not deviate
too much across the globe.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstr
interpret tags literally against local legalites.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
/DrBobBarr/status/431830942144299008
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 03/12/13 16:44, david wrote:
On 03/12/13 14:22, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 03/12/13 14:08, Roger Calvert wrote:
On the new front page, the search button seems to have a broken link -
if you type in a place name (I tried 'Kendal' and 'Barrow') it goes to
http://www.openstreet
.
What browser are you using? How exactly are you performing the search
when it errors - do you enter return after typing? or click the search
button with them mouse?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
unced it would go live at 11am yesterday what things
would you have done differently as a result?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
is people that want to signup and contribute.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
s that they need to login to enable it?
In any case, if it isn't a regression then it's out of scope as a bug
report against the redesign.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing l
t short I guess, but the vast majority of my
email was explainging the rationale behind the tagging.
Lessons:
* We should be able to explain the reasoning behind our tagging if asked.
Absolutely, and I believe I did so.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
ht
On 03/11/13 19:41, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 03/11/13 19:07, Jonathan wrote:
What we should be mapping is reality, so that people can use that data
to build on. Whether a road is signed in Green, Pink or Purple tells a
user nothing, it may have a legal definition but that is all. The tag
we give
in
green rather than orange.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Roads => highway=trunk
White Signed A Roads => highway=primary
B Roads => highway=secondary
Hopefully that will explain everything ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
uot; place your business/event here" and one
for "map improvement needed here"
Why? Both are calls for the map to be improved surely, even if one is
phrased slightly oddly.
We certainly don't want to maintain a permanent POI layer spearate from
the main data if that's wh
AUTHORITY["EPSG","4277"]],
PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],
PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",49],
PARAMETER["central_meridian",-2],
PARAMETER["scale_factor",0.9996012717],
PARAMETER["false_easting",400
practice. On top of which 0203 is now in
use as well...
That said I see little benefit in a mass edit, especially in cases which
just amount to inserting or moving whitespace. Then again I see little
benefit in adding phone numbers to OSM in the first place.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
