e:
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N=21279378=place
Well it doesn't for me. Do you have your browser languages set to
prefer Latin or something (that's the name:la for the UK relation).
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
, at 9:41 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
If we assume that a new copyright is created by the scanning (which is
a complicated question) then there is no way it expires next year.
What exactly do you think the term is for this copyright and when do
you think it starts from?
I don't think it's relevant
penstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing
the start or end point is on the flare why would a
router do that over the shorter route on the roundabout... I mean
maybe there are a few cases where the flare is shorter somehow?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing
dy turning off which should exclude it from
any consideration by a router?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hopefully I've fixed them on TW for the next update.
Tom
On 16/09/2020 12:44, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
That would be because somebody on TranslateWiki has added a bunch
of bogus strings to the en-GB translation:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/config
fo/talk-gb
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
9/products/OCB-1179.jpg
Mark
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing li
hway-code
BCC to DWG because of the impact in cycle routing.
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 14/03/2020 11:37, Dan S wrote:
Op za 14 mrt. 2020 om 11:20 schreef Tom Hughes via Talk-GB
:
On 14/03/2020 11:13, Rob Nickerson wrote:
As may have seen in Simon's response it sounds like we currently lack
list moderators. If this is something you would like to do please email
this mailing
the situation
with them before attempting a putsch.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/l
__
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
s "open data" to you?
What it says to me is "copyright for 50 years from the end of
the year when it was published" so unless there is some license
allowing it's use then no, it can't be used.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
On 19/07/2019 14:17, David Woolley wrote:
On 19/07/2019 13:37, Tom Hughes wrote:
I would say the logical consequence of that argument is that no road
should be mapped as tertiary, as, unless taken from OS, it is a
subjective judgement and can't be consistently verified.
That doesn't follow
tertiary, unclassified and residential on a more subjective
basis.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
t.
Could someone with moderator abilities take a look please?
Done, but for future reference he will find it works a lot better
if he subscribes to the list first...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing li
be somewhere below
Cheshunt and west of Waltham Abbey.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
outlandish ideas I've heard in OSM tagging circles, and that's
saying a lot.
To be fair "addr:city=Chipping Norton" would be outlandish even for
an address *in* Chipping Norton...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-
).
There is a simplified algorithmic transformation but a fully
accurate conversion requires the OSTN02 data.
I'm not sure what the current status is but they certainly used
to claim various IP rights over it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 18/01/2019 09:49, Brian Prangle wrote:
Has anyone else noticed problems with edits failing to render?. Stuff I
did 2 days ago still not showing up
Replication had stalled on one of the render servers - it is catching
up now but will take a few hours to get everything.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
tmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
l have any correlation with Land
Registry. I'm guessing .gov isn’t that joined up.
Cheers
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
telligence:
https://twitter.com/jonobennett/status/1065232930883145728
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
f road, and that is marked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25365715
Because that is the only vehicular access to the area it has the effect
of controlling traffic in the whole area.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
T
ist
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.
t it's a stupid idea, so please don't...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
a particular building has.
I am not bulk adding these (I do not have the technical knowledge or
time) I am just adding postcodes to properties as I add them.
So how are you working out which postcode to use? Sometimes it is
fairly obvious from the centroid location but it often isn't.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
On 03/11/2018 15:50, Colin Smale wrote:
The coastline ways with source=PGS are really old and inaccurate. I am
not sure of their exact provenance but I think they were traced from
some primitive aerial imagery.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:source%3DPGS
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
uot; at all:
https://maps.compton.nu/view#18/50.82039/-0.13968/os2500
https://maps.compton.nu/view#18/50.82039/-0.13968/os1250
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
That said I will certainly agree that what you're doing is far better
than what many companies trying to get their clients locations into OSM
have done in the past.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing li
n anything
but.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
) is there any reason we can't do such imports
without discussion with/permission from the company concerned?
Just a small thing called copyright and/or database right.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
invented by using some
algorithm to draw a polygon that happens to encapsulate all those
delivery points.
Depending on the algorithm that may or may allow for overlapping
polygons and in general you may get different answer depending on the
details of the algorithm used.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
On 30/08/17 10:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
As best I can tell from wikipedia the new bridge is the M90 and under
motorway conditions with the old bridge presumably expected to carry
non-motorway traffic as the A9000.
So from
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-41086779
to carry
non-motorway traffic as the A9000.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
Mostly these seem to be id edits so I'm guessing perhaps a University course
or something.
I suspect Pokemon Go is a more likely explanation.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
I was just saying earlier today at SotM that I'd dearly love to get
hold of the historical boundary data that Vision of Britain has but
chooses for some reason only to make available to people with an
academic affiliation
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
instead of just entering the file name. It is very
irritating and demotivating :-( Editing OSM already takes too much of my
time.
I think it is your browser that has changed, not us.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
be contacted to see if this can be reinstated?
I think Grant is already aware if you're talking about URL parameters.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
? How should they be tagged?
I suggest barge=concrete ;-)
Not that I had any trouble believing you could make ships out of
concrete or anything when I first heard about them as a teenager.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
o work out what they might do not to
actually do it ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
strong word... There are many, many towns and
villages without any town or parish council.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
there to which he and possibly
some other OSMers gave evidence.
Certainly in general we have a particularly active community in the
Nottingham area so it's always worth talking to them about any local issues.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
.
If we did try and map it to sub-B classifications then we would probably
have to do it on a per-authority basis as each authority has it's own
classification scheme below B.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing
treatment I wonder?
Should we have a French style and a US style and a Chinese style and...
I mean how exactly do you propose to decide which national styles should
get special treatment?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
On 14/09/15 11:24, Lester Caine wrote:
On 14/09/15 11:11, Tom Hughes wrote:
Broxbourne, Wormley and Turnford don't really have significant centres
and historically would likely have been considered villages. Broxbourne
is now a town in wikipedia with a population of over 13 thousand while
e parishes of Broxbourne and Great
Amwell, neither of which has a significant high street, while it has has
a market charter wince 1253 and has a high street which clearly dates
back some centuries.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
_
On 14/09/15 10:39, Lester Caine wrote:
On 14/09/15 09:51, Tom Hughes wrote:
Hell, try http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/1009 where I now live
which wasn't even a parish in it's own right until 1844 but was almost
certainly considered a town before that, as a coaching stop on the main
necessarily growing in other ways.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
://geo.nls.uk/mapdata2/os/25_inch/surrey/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
http://geo.nls.uk/mapdata2/os/25_inch/sussex/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
http://geo.nls.uk/mapdata2/os/25_inch/buckingham/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
http://geo.nls.uk/mapdata2/os/25_inch/london/{z}/{x}/{y}.png
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
company number
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Main_Page
Does anyone have any suggestions or will I just have to pay the VAT
OSMF is not a charity, so there is no charity number.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
to
record names erroneously asserted in official sources.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
be able
to find postcodes when I type them in?
Why would it make any difference? As far as I know Nominatim already
uses the Codepoint Open data?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
, this is confusing things at times.
Well if you told us where on the map you were looking so that we could
see for ourselves then it would be a lot easier to comment...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 13/11/14 09:52, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 13/11/14 09:42, Lester Caine wrote:
Silly question ...
Just been looking at a local note and I'm a little curious as to what
differentiates text appearing with a purple dot on a building and the
more normal brown text on surrounding buildings? While
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
, but their post town
is Crewkerne.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
by:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Math1985/history
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
it might affect other
apps routing decisions in entirely different ways.
There is a well defined meaning to trunk/primary/secondary for UK roads
so please use it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk
they should be included in everyday renderings - they are
something that belong on specialist renderings for specialist uses of
the sort you mentioned.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
:
addr:street=Something Technology Park
assuming that the technology park is actually a road, or collection or
roads, that comes off Other thing Road.
eg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123243789
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 03/08/14 17:02, Tom Hughes wrote:
See, for example:
http://www3.lancashire.gov.uk/corporate/atoz/a_to_z/service.asp?u_id=1065tab=3siteid=5409pageid=29027e=e
http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn00402.pdf is also informative.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
twenty years now and to date nobody has managed to come up
with an answer that makes everybody happy so I suggest we don't try and
do so here and now.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
, it could then be
replicated for more topics; and in other territories.
What would you consider a demonstration of success exactly?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
was taking the question of accuracy as a given.
My point was not whether we can accurately add the right tags, but
rather whether doing so is actually useful.
There's an almost infinite number of things we could add, but if nobody
ever uses them, is the time take do so wasted?
Tom
--
Tom
On 08/06/14 23:11, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 8 June 2014 22:49, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
There's an almost infinite number of things we could add, but if nobody ever
uses them, is the time take do so wasted?
Why do you (apparently) suppose they will not be used?
I don't suppose one
postcodes. One covers both
sides for about one third of the length and the other two each cover one
side for the other two thirds.
Postcodes are part of an address and belong to a building, not a street,
so that is where they should be tagged.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
places and what places people would expect
to show up first on the map so while it may be mapping for the renderer
it's also in agreement with the documented meaning of the tag.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing
, the Should normally have a population
of at least 100,000 people and be larger than nearby place=towns rule.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
tags literally against local legalites.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
the globe so we need to find a local way in
each area to define what a tag means so that meaning does not deviate
too much across the globe.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
/DrBobBarr/status/431830942144299008
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
are you using? How exactly are you performing the search
when it errors - do you enter return after typing? or click the search
button with them mouse?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
On 03/12/13 16:44, david wrote:
On 03/12/13 14:22, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 03/12/13 14:08, Roger Calvert wrote:
On the new front page, the search button seems to have a broken link -
if you type in a place name (I tried 'Kendal' and 'Barrow') it goes to
http://www.openstreetmap.org/search
yesterday what things
would you have done differently as a result?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
to enable it?
In any case, if it isn't a regression then it's out of scope as a bug
report against the redesign.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
and contribute.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
, but the vast majority of my
email was explainging the rationale behind the tagging.
Lessons:
* We should be able to explain the reasoning behind our tagging if asked.
Absolutely, and I believe I did so.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 03/11/13 19:41, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 03/11/13 19:07, Jonathan wrote:
What we should be mapping is reality, so that people can use that data
to build on. Whether a road is signed in Green, Pink or Purple tells a
user nothing, it may have a legal definition but that is all. The tag
we give
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
business/event here and one
for map improvement needed here
Why? Both are calls for the map to be improved surely, even if one is
phrased slightly oddly.
We certainly don't want to maintain a permanent POI layer spearate from
the main data if that's what you're suggesting.
Tom
--
Tom
[central_meridian,-2],
PARAMETER[scale_factor,0.9996012717],
PARAMETER[false_easting,40],
PARAMETER[false_northing,-10],
UNIT[metre,1,
AUTHORITY[EPSG,9001]],
AUTHORITY[EPSG,27700]]
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
or in practice. On top of which 0203 is now in
use as well...
That said I see little benefit in a mass edit, especially in cases which
just amount to inserting or moving whitespace. Then again I see little
benefit in adding phone numbers to OSM in the first place.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu
secondary A road.
Which is why the wiki says what it does.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
of whether food is available or not...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
and thinks this is the correct way
to create a custom map for himself?
His english doesn't seem to be brilliant which may not be helping with
people's attempts to explain the problem to him.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk
://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39467039
The one with all the Royal Mail trucks outside on StreetView you mean?
Some large businesses which have special delivery arrangements and have
their own postcodes will map to the local delivery office, which is what
you are seeing here.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
postcode of the
large Royal Mail warehouse on the outskirts of Aberdeen then I would
just leave it and not add any of them.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London_Hack_Weekend_Dec_2012
Hope to see some of you there,
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
On 31/10/12 11:51, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data?
Is that in there?
I believe it is in Nominatim 2 yes.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
On 31/10/12 11:58, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:54, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:51, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data
.
The John Snow is reasonable - it's a Sam Smith's pub these days so
nothing special except that the beer is cheap.
We have used it once or twice for meetups, but not recently.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
