Hello MFPA,
> If you go to Folder | Maintenance Centre, you can click "select all"
> to select all the folders (or/and tick a box for each folder you wish
> to select or de-select), tick boxes for which of the four maintenance
> actions () you wish to perform on all the selected folders, then cli
Hello Rick,
> It will work, but it is S_L_O_W
You're not kidding.
--
Best regards,
Tonymailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk
The Bat! 5.8.10
Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/t
It will work, but it is S_L_O_W
--
Rick
"Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing
just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is
said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine
origin. Believe noth
Hi
On Monday 2 June 2014 at 11:42:00 AM, in
, Tony Hoare wrote:
> Hello MFPA,
>>> Is there a purge all command? Or even purge all
>>> recursively?
>> I don't know if it works for IMAP as well as for POP,
>> but you could try Folder | Maintenance Centre.
> I'm looking for a way where I don't
Hello MFPA,
>> Is there a purge all command? Or even purge all
>> recursively?
> I don't know if it works for IMAP as well as for POP, but you could
> try Folder | Maintenance Centre.
I'm looking for a way where I don't have to set it on every folder.
Perhaps at the account level.
Cheers
Hi
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 at 4:15:17 PM, in
, Tony Hoare wrote:
> Hello TBUDL,
> Does anyone know how to purge all folders without
> having to set each individual folder to purge on exit?
> Is there a purge all command? Or even purge all
> recursively?
I don't know if it works for IMAP
Hello TBUDL,
Does anyone know how to purge all folders without having to set each
individual folder to purge on exit?
Is there a purge all command? Or even purge all recursively?
--
Best regards,
Tony mailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk
The Bat! 5.8.10 with IMAP on Windows 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 2:41:40 AM, you wrote:
M> Are you purging via "folder maintenance" or automatically via the
M> "on exit" settings on the folder properties/additional tab?
I use both: maintenance runs every mornin
> if anyone else is having this problem.
Are you purging via "folder maintenance" or automatically via the
"on exit" settings on the folder properties/additional tab?
The "on exit, compress" checkbox used to be selected by default
when you created a folder but not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
Monday, October 9, 2006, 8:00:43 PM, you wrote:
PF> I have the same problem. For IMAP folders, this does not work at
PF> all.
FYI, I'm not using IMAP.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBRSpwuLrieAXxW2ntEQIuXQCgyN
Richard,
On 08-10-2006 17:26, you wrote in
:
> I'm using the latest release (3.85.03) Is this a common bug or is it
> unique to me?
I have the same problem. For IMAP folders, this does not work at all.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
3.85.03 Pro MyGate, AVG
4 POP3, 9 IMAP (UWIMAP 200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
Monday, October 9, 2006, 8:12:05 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Richard,
TF> Are the old messages read or unread? There is a setting somewhere
that
TF> only read messages are deleted, but that can be switched.
Some are read, some are unread. It p
Hello Richard,
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 20:26:08 +0500 GMT (08/10/2006, 22:26 +0700 GMT),
Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
RHS> I'm having problems with purging folders. I've set several folders
RHS> with either a maximum number of messages or a maximum retention
RHS> period. Most of the
I know - forgot the cutline. I realized it as I was sending. Sorry.
--
Rick
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having problems with purging folders. I've set several folders
with either a maximum number of messages or a maximum retention
period. Most of the time this does not work, meaning they aren't
purged when the conditions are met. I ju
Hallo Richard,
On Thu, 4 May 2006 06:25:04 +0500GMT (4-5-2006, 3:25 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RHS> I've consistently used betas after they've been out for a day or two,
RHS> and am now using the latest release. Given that this has obviously
RHS> been a problem for quite awhile, is there an
properties as suggested uniformly across the folders I want purged.
Some folders were purged after running folder maintenance but others
were not. I then changed the settings on one from purging those in
excess of 180 days to a maximum number of messages, and it worked. I
then did that for a second
Roelof,
Thursday, May 4, 2006, 1:36:59 AM, you wrote:
RO> Are they unread?
RO> What's your setting at:
RO> Account -> Properties -> Mail management -> Deletion -> Purge unread
messages
Some of the messages are unread, some read. I set the properties to
purge unread messages as you suggested,
Hallo Richard,
On Wed, 3 May 2006 21:15:00 +0500GMT (3-5-2006, 18:15 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RHS> For example, I may have set a limit of 180 days, but I find
RHS> messages older than a year still there (and not parked).
Are they unread?
What's your setting at:
Account -> Properties ->
d restarted, and there are still messages over a
year old there. Some folders are purging properly, but some are not
even though the settings are identical.
--
Rick
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://w
Hi Richard,
on Wed, 3 May 2006 21:15:00 +0500GMT (03.05.2006, 18:15 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
RHS> For a number of folders I have set the properties to purge messages
RHS> either above a certain number or older than a set number of days.
RHS> Several folders (including TBUDL) are no
For a number of folders I have set the properties to purge messages
either above a certain number or older than a set number of days.
Several folders (including TBUDL) are not purging properly. For
example, I may have set a limit of 180 days, but I find messages older
than a year still there (and
Hallo technical,
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:46:41 +0100GMT (7-11-2005, 13:46 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
T> For thos reason I have some folders than need to be purged/compressed
T> when I leave TB, so fields like "Maximum stored message is" and
T> "Keep messages in base for (days)" are filled but
Hello,
For thos reason I have some folders than need to be purged/compressed
when I leave TB, so fields like "Maximum stored message is" and
"Keep messages in base for (days)" are filled but this works only for
read message, not unread one.
Is there a way to fix this, without filtering them and m
s folder easier to
>> read for TB by removing the dead space of already deleted mails from
>> folders. Purging on IMAP will permanently delete emails in the inbox
>> on server that have been marked for deletion.
> This is incorrect. Allie is correct in his description.
Sorry
s from
> folders. Purging on IMAP will permanently delete emails in the inbox
> on server that have been marked for deletion.
This is incorrect. Allie is correct in his description.
From the TB documentation
The "Purge" action will result in marking messages as deleted in
folders whe
Tim, [T] wrote:
> Can someone give me a reminder on terminology? What's compressing,
> and what's purging (on IMAP)?
Compressing in TB! is the complete removal from the message base, all
messages marked for deletion.
Purging in TB! removes those messages that fit your purgi
Hello Tim,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 4:11:11 AM, you wrote:
> Can someone give me a reminder on terminology? What's compressing, and what's
> purging (on IMAP)?
> The setting I described removes deleted messages from the server in my setup --
> is that purging or com
vin seems to work.
>
Can someone give me a reminder on terminology? What's compressing, and what's
purging (on IMAP)?
The setting I described removes deleted messages from the server in my setup --
is that purging or compressing?
--
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hi Mean Drake
-
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 03:26:53 [GMT +0530] (which was 2:56 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> This doesn't Purge. As I mentioned, only Folder>Compress+Purge as
> suggested by Kevin seems to work.
You can also try Folder/Maintenance and th
Hello Tim,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 3:01:20 AM, you wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 September 2004, Mean Drake wrote:
MD>> What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to
MD>> trash but even though I empty trash, the messages on server do
MD>> not get purged. How do I purge all messa
On Tuesday, 28 September 2004, Mean Drake wrote:
MD> What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to
MD> trash but even though I empty trash, the messages on server do
MD> not get purged. How do I purge all messages on server using TB?
Account Properties > Mail Management > IMAP F
Hello Joe,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 2:38:15 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Mean,
> Monday, September 27, 2004, 4:57:29 PM, you wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Somehow I think there is a problem with IMAP folders. Using TB
>> 3.0.
>> What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to
>> trash but
Hello Mean,
Monday, September 27, 2004, 4:57:29 PM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> Somehow I think there is a problem with IMAP folders. Using TB
> 3.0.
> What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to
> trash but even though I empty trash, the messages on server do
> not get purged. Ho
Hi Mean Drake
-
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 02:27:29 [GMT +0530] (which was 1:57 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Somehow I think there is a problem with IMAP folders. Using TB
> 3.0.
> What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to
> trash
Hello,
Somehow I think there is a problem with IMAP folders. Using TB
3.0.
What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to
trash but even though I empty trash, the messages on server do
not get purged. How do I purge all messages on server using TB?
--
Best regards,
Mean
Hello rich,
Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 4:05:09 PM, you wrote:
>>> llpc>>> Some of my folder are not removing old messages according to the
>>> llpc>>> settings I have made, when the Bat closes. How can I fix this? Do I
>>> llpc>>> have to delete the folder and recreate it?
>>>
>>> SC> x Max
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:34:45 -0400, rich gregory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> llpc>>> Some of my folder are not removing old messages according to the
> llpc>>> settings I have made, when the Bat closes. How can I fix this? Do I
> llpc>>> have to delete the folder and recreate it?
>
> SC> x Maxim
On Mon 13-Sep-04 10:01am -0400, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> Oops. I guess attachments aren't allowed on TBUDL. This is what I have
> set:
> x Maximum number of stored messages is 200
> x Keep messages in base for (days) 20
> On Exit
> x Remove old messagesx Compress the folder
Hello Stuart,
Monday, September 13, 2004, 4:01:50 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Stuart,
> Monday, September 13, 2004, 9:38:34 AM, you wrote:
llpc>>> Some of my folder are not removing old messages according to the
llpc>>> settings I have made, when the Bat closes. How can I fix this? Do I
llpc>>> have
Hello Stuart,
Monday, September 13, 2004, 9:38:34 AM, you wrote:
llpc>> Some of my folder are not removing old messages according to the
llpc>> settings I have made, when the Bat closes. How can I fix this? Do I
llpc>> have to delete the folder and recreate it?
SC> I have attached a screenshot of
Hello Gordon,
Monday, September 13, 2004, 6:47:56 AM, you wrote:
llpc> Some of my folder are not removing old messages according to the
llpc> settings I have made, when the Bat closes. How can I fix this? Do I
llpc> have to delete the folder and recreate it?
I have attached a screenshot of my set
Some of my folder are not removing old messages according to the
settings I have made, when the Bat closes. How can I fix this? Do I
have to delete the folder and recreate it?
Gordon Nicholson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Edgar,
@4-Nov-2003, 20:18 +0100 (04-Nov 19:18 UK time) Edgar said to All:
> .. I hoped that this function would use the alternative method and
> moved the messages to the archive. Did I miss interpret the
> purging option?
You did. Purge does "what it says on the tin&quo
when I use the purge folder with folder maintenance the
messages will be deleted (not moved and they're not on the trash
can).
I hoped that this function would use the alternative method and
moved the messages to the archive. Did I miss interpret the
purging option?
--
Cheers,
Edgar
Communic
On Thursday, October 30, 2003 at 3:25:31 PM, Edgar wrote in the
message "Using purging old messages with the folder maintenance option
does not use the alternative deletion method."
<mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Looking at the key now I can not change the name without revoking
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chris,
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, 1:09:32 AM, you wrote:
> Edgar, your PGP key doesn't have a last name! Who are you?
The name in the PGP key is just the name like in my e-mail.
Looking at the key now I can not change the name without revo
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003 at 3:51:09 PM, Edgar wrote in the
message "Using purging old messages with the folder maintenance option
does not use the alternative deletion method."
<mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Edgar, your PGP key doesn't have a last name! Who are you?
-
the
purge folder with folder maintenance the messages will be deleted
(not moved and they're not on the trash can).
I hoped that this function would use the alternative method and
moved the messages to the archive. Did I miss interpret the
purging option?
- --
Cheers,
Edgar
Communicating wi
Hello Jonathan,
JA> Account, Properties, then Mail Management, then "IMAP Fine-Tune" then
JA> check the box "compress folders when switching to another folder".
Yes, I'm unsure exactly what that does because it has no noticeable
effect ... it certainly doesn't purge the folders, which is what I'm
On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, David Boggon wrote...
> Is it true that there is no way to have all folders purged &
> compressed automatically while one is working in an IMAP account?
eh... kinda... Though I'm not sure if the feature works, as I've not
seen it working yet, but if you select the
DB> Otherwise things aren't quite as smooth and seamless in
DB> the bat as with POP3, (as far as I'm concerned after a few days)
DB> mainly because of the synchronisation process
I also can't get a simple message filter to work properly.
A move filter to take particular messages to the inbox of
Hello John,
JM> What is IMAP, how does one happen to get this type of email account
JM> instead of a regular pop account?
I'm sure many people on this list could explain IMAP better than I.
I've also read helpful introductions to IMAP on the web by typing in
into google.
Basically IMAP is a pro
Hallo John,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:13:49 -0500GMT (16-10-03, 21:13 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DB>> I'm busy exploring the nuances and virtues of IMAP
JM> What is IMAP, how does one happen to get this type of email account
JM> instead of a regular pop account?
IMAP: Internet Message Access
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Wednesday, October 15, 2003, 4:19:51 PM, you wrote:
DB> I'm busy exploring the nuances and virtues of IMAP
What is IMAP, how does one happen to get this type of email account
instead of a regular pop account?
--
John Morse
C
Hi TBUDL,
I'm busy exploring the nuances and virtues of IMAP and TB!
Is it true that there is no way to have all
folders purged & compressed automatically while one is working in an
IMAP account?
As messages are deleted and moved between folders on TB! it gets
difficult to know exactly wha
ON Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 10:42:59 PM, you wrote:
R> Either i'm missing something or is there a buglet ??
Hi Rob,
There isn´t an other filter placing mail in the trash folder, like a
spam filter?
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi Roelof,
on Thu, 2 Oct 2003, at 01:56:03 local time (GMT +0200), you wrote:
R>> But i see what's happening now ; when i purge the folder, all messages i
R>> just read are moved to Trash, regardless of their date ?!
RO> That's not the intended behaviour.
i would hope so ... ;-)
R>> I would
Hallo Rob,
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 00:42:05 +0200GMT (2-10-03, 0:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
R> But i see what's happening now ; when i purge the folder, all messages i
R> just read are moved to Trash, regardless of their date ?!
That's not the intended behaviour.
R> I would expect that olde
Hi Roelof,
on Wed, 1 Oct 2003, at 23:22:31 local time (GMT +0200), you wrote:
RO> You wouldn't have parked all of those 1196 messages, would you?
Nope, just a dozen or so ...
RO> Delete the messages.tbi in the tbudl folder, maybe its corrupt.
Tried it, no change.
But i see what's happening no
Hallo Rob,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:42:59 +0200GMT (1-10-03, 22:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
R> Either i'm missing something or is there a buglet ??
You wouldn't have parked all of those 1196 messages, would you?
Delete the messages.tbi in the tbudl folder, maybe its corrupt. (Don't
touch t
Hi,
i just noticed a whole bunch of very recent (1 from today!) TBUDL posts in
my Trash folder, which is a bit odd as i have '999' as 'maximum number of
stored messages' and '21 days' as 'keep messages in the base for ...' for
the TBUDL folder.
Still there are 1196 messages in the folder (even af
Saturday, September 20, 2003, 11:14:00 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:37:59 -0500 GMT (21/09/2003, 05:37 +0700 GMT),
TF> WL wrote:
>> I've recreated folder, check the integrity; any suggestions
>> on how to debug this?
TF> This should be fixed in the current version. I su
Hello WL,
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:37:59 -0500 GMT (21/09/2003, 05:37 +0700 GMT),
WL wrote:
> I've recreated folder, check the integrity; any suggestions
> on how to debug this?
This should be fixed in the current version. I suggest you download
2.00.6 and see whether your problem persists.
--
Hello.
I have a few folders set to keep a max number of messages
stored, but one (and only one, it seems) folder stores more
messages than the set limit.
Using the menu command "purge+compress," TB reports nothing
to do. Going to the Maintenance Center and only selecting
the folder for "Purge old
Michael12-
That's pretty bizarre, but let me take a stab at the permissions
thing...
When TB does a purge/compress it creates a copy of the mail folder to
hold the result, then deletes the original when the database
compression is successful. It seems that, given your configuration, XP
isn't gran
Hello all,
I have a serious problem here and would be very grateful
for a solution. We have various shared email folders that
we use. They are stored on one WindowsXP PC and
we access them from various other PCs. In each folder
there are the usual two email files. Normally they have
their XP sec
Hello Yuki,
Saturday, February 23, 2002, 2:37:57 AM, you wrote:
YT> Saturday, February 23, 2002, 9:20:07 AM, Maurice wrote:
MS>> Just press Ctrl-] and you'll be at the first unread message in
MS>> the folder.
YT> Not for me, it doesn't. Wonder why. I just did a purge and
YT> compress, leavin
Saturday, February 23, 2002, 9:20:07 AM, Maurice wrote:
MS> Just press Ctrl-] and you'll be at the first unread message in
MS> the folder.
Not for me, it doesn't. Wonder why. I just did a purge and
compress, leaving two unread messages in the folder. Focus was lost,
of course, after that, bei
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 14:04:39 [GMT +0900] (which was 6:04
where I live) Yuki Taga wrote:
YT> But whenever I purge and compress and subsequently reopen a folder,
YT> the message list has lost the focus, and because of that the message
YT> list has scrolled all the way up to the beginn
I also like reading current mail in the bottom of the list. I
have to find the oldest unread email and open it and then if I
leave the folder the next time I return I will return to that
position. I haven't found another go-round after compression.
Elaine
> All:
> I like my messages sorted b
All:
I like my messages sorted by creation date, with the oldest messages
at the top, and unread messages at the bottom. No problem to do
that, of course.
But whenever I purge and compress and subsequently reopen a folder,
the message list has lost the focus, and because of that the message
li
On Tuesday, January 22, 2002, at 06:02:54 [GMT +1300] (which was 18:02
where I live) Allister Jenks wrote:
AJ> Is there a solution to purge the emails automatically from this folder
AJ> once they are X days old, *regardless* of whether they have been read
AJ> or not?
That's odd because this is e
Hello Christian Dysthe,
You wrote on 5/27/2001, 6:57 AM:
Christian> when you purge a folder based on rules set for it (i.e. no
Christian> more than 100 messages in folder) will attachments for
Christian> purged mail also be deleted?
>From What's new in The Bat! 1.52?
(located in README.TXT in
Hello TBUDL,
when you purge a folder based on rules set for it (i.e. no more than
100 messages in folder) will attachments for purged mail also be
deleted? I have my accounts set so that attachments for mail from
emptied trash gets deleted, but I am not sure if this also is the
case whe
Here, "purge" should be "compress". (In dBase/Clipper terminology,
it's "pack".)
What does "purging" do, then? It means deleting old messages
according to a set criteria. If you have experience with higher-end
newsreader, you should have no trouble wit
Friday, April 13, 2001, 12:10:40 PM, you wrote:
>> I have been compressing, which seems to purge. Today I tried purging,
>> which seems to compress. They appear to be redundant processes.
> No, as Karin put it, purge and compress are two different things.
> It's
rom time and time: remove old entries (messages) from
>> the messge database (*.tbb).
> I have been compressing, which seems to purge. Today I tried purging,
> which seems to compress. They appear to be redundant processes.
No, as Karin put it, purge and compress are two different thi
emove old entries
> (messages) from the messge database (*.tbb).
I have been compressing, which seems to purge. Today I tried purging,
which seems to compress. They appear to be redundant processes.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385
mai
On 12-04-2001 at 21:55, Dwight A Corrin kindly wrote:
> Thursday, April 12, 2001, 11:50:11 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
>> I even did a little house
>> cleaning job that I usually do in the weekend: killing dupes in all
>> folders, purging and compressing all folders.
> Showing my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 09:06:22 -0400, dMb wrote:
d> I just ran the Purge option, yet I still have messages in the folder
d> that are dated October 9, 2000 (both created and received). I would
d> have assumed that the oldest messages would be dated
On Saturday, October 14, 2000, 6:06:22 AM, dMb wrote:
> I've noticed that something has changed in the way the TB! purges
> old messages. I think it has added one day to all of my folders.
If it's changed, it's changed long ago. I remember it reported
several months ago. And yes, it happens her
I've noticed that something has changed in the way the TB! purges old
messages. I think it has added one day to all of my folders.
Example.
I have the option selected to keep messages in base (i.e. purge after )
4 days in a particular folder.
Today is October 14, 2000.
I just ran the Purge op
Hi Co-Batties,
did anyone notice too that "Purge all folders" since 1.42 purges - in
my case e. g. - sometimes ten times the amount of space the old
"Purge" used to do?
Cheers,
Vince
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.theba
tracer wrote:
dMb>> Is there anyway to prevent purging of unread messages? I looked
dMb>> around but couldn't find the setting.
> The way I handle my incoming mail and I am sure it can be improved, is
> to make all or most regular incomings a filter so they go to their
Hello dMb,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 07:25:37 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 7:25:37 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
dMb wrote:
dMb> I just discovered the hard way that Purging also removes unread mail,
dMb> at least as I currently have TB set up.
dMb> This rea
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 04:11:52 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> But this last (or topmost) Received: stamp should be machine-dependant, not
> otherwise. Right now TB does just the same, but putting this info into the folder
> index file directly. This results in:
> 1. If the message is got fro
I just discovered the hard way that Purging also removes unread mail,
at least as I currently have TB set up.
This really isn't a good thing for me.
Is there anyway to prevent purging of unread messages? I looked
around but couldn't find the setting.
Thanks.
Derek
--
[EMAIL PROTE
Hi there!
On 5 Jan 00, at 1:29, Peter Steiner wrote
about "Re: Purging folders for old message":
> So you were not talking about the mailbox format...
>
> If I export your message to UNIX mailbox format it looks like:
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 5 01
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 02:31:42 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>> PS> Are we talking about the mailbox file format? From my understanding
>> PS> the Received time is the time in the first line of each message (the
>> PS> one starting with "From ").
> Wrong here:-) For example, here's the header
Hi there!
On 4 Jan 00, at 10:01, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re[2]: Purging folders for old mess":
> Hi Peter,
> >> The "received" time should apparently be equal to the *latest*
> >> time stamp found in the Received: headers, IMO. If implemente
On Monday, January 03, 2000, 2:55:00 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 18:03:53 +0100, Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
>> I think I'll go for the Perl version, thanks! ;] Of course, this means
>> I'll have to write the script first, and not being too firm in Perl
>> _yet_... I'll let you know whe
Hi Peter,
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 22:42:58 +0100GMT (01/04/2000, 05:42 +0800GMT),
Peter Steiner wrote:
>> The "received" time should apparently be equal to the *latest*
>> time stamp found in the Received: headers, IMO. If implemented
>> this way, many problems would have gone forever...
PS> Are we
Hello Monbebe Admin,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 at 14:02:40 (GMT +0100) [Tuesday, January 04, 2000
20:02:40 GMT +0700], you told to the list:
MA> I have added "keep message in base for n (days)" to 90 days. Also
MA> I have checked "Remove old messages on exit" as well as "Compress
MA> the folder", bu
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 18:03:53 +0100, Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
> I think I'll go for the Perl version, thanks! ;] Of course, this means
> I'll have to write the script first, and not being too firm in Perl
> _yet_... I'll let you know when I'm bald due to tearing out of my own
> hair! *grin*
Ma
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 23:21:27 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> The "received" time should apparently be equal to the *latest*
> time stamp found in the Received: headers, IMO. If implemented
> this way, many problems would have gone forever...
Are we talking about the mailbox file format? From
Hi there!
On 3 Jan 00, at 18:12, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote
about "Re: Purging folders for old message":
> AVK>> Might be simplier then that. Export to Unix mailbox, then make a
> AVK>> simple Perl script, apply it -- and import the folders back.
>
> CD>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Marck,
Monday, January 03, 2000, 7:12:29 PM, you wrote:
AVK>>> Might be simplier then that. Export to Unix mailbox, then make a
AVK>>> simple Perl script, apply it -- and import the folders back.
CD>> I think I'll go for the Perl version, thank
Hi Carsten,
On 03 January 2000 at 18:03:53 GMT +0100 (which was 17:03 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
AVK>> Might be simplier then that. Export to Unix mailbox, then make a
AVK>> simple Perl script, apply it -- and import the folders back.
CD> I think I'll go for
Hallo Monbebe,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:08:55 +0100 GMT (04.01.2000, 23:08 +0800 GMT),
Monbebe Admin will write:
>> Is the creation date of the message older than 90 days or is it the
>> received date? TB! checks the received date, and only if _that's_
>> older than 90 days, will it d
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
