SPAM Filter

Hello Group I've been away from Windows for a while but I'm now back home with XP x64 and TheBat v 5.0.34. I see we no longer have the BayesIT (? spelling) plug in for a variety of reasons. What do people use/recommend in its place? It's useful to be able to identify SPAM and have it moved to

SPAM Filter

Fellow TB users, I was planning to set up a filter where in all mails addressed to me in which the sender's name is not in the address book is put in a different folder. As per the options in 'Advanced' in filters. I just wanted to check whether the filter will check for all addresse

Spam filter

I never paid much attention before in email client mailing lists to discussions about spam filters because my spam was negligible. It has recently increased, though, presumably due to my email address being on a web site. Now I'm wondering about all those articles. What is the concept behind fi

Spam Filter

Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam? These days I get so much rubbish - be a millionaire in 30 days, send me money & make yourself rich, etc., Viagra without a prescription (I sure could do with some in any case ), etc. etc. Any one had any success in getting rid of these pest

K9 spam filter

age Filter beginFilter UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08] Name: K9\20Anti-Spam Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A} MoveMessage folder \5C\5Cpatnet\5C$JUNK$ IsActive endFilter Email marked as spam stays resolutely in the inbox. Any ideas? Thank you in advance. -- B

Disabling spam filter

Hi - Since I upgraded the last time, this spam device has driven me bonkers. I have just scanned over 800 messages here, and haven't found a fix, and can only hope I haven't missed it. Thanks be that Batters are so good about subject lines! If the thing can't be disabled altogether, is it at le

Re: SPAM Filter

Hello Jeff, On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 you wrote: JG> Hello Group JG> I've been away from Windows for a while but I'm now back home with XP JG> x64 and TheBat v 5.0.34. JG> I see we no longer have the BayesIT (? spelling) plug in for a variety JG> of reasons. JG> What do people use/rec

Re: SPAM Filter

Jeff, If the TB4 plug-ins are compatible with TB5, you might want to take a look at the Regula Anti-spam plug-in. I've been using it ever since my mail server went to STARTLS (which broke POPfile) about six months ago. After a bit of training Regula seems to be doing a good job of catching the

Spam filter strings?

I'm trying to set up some strings to filter spam. The actual filtering will be done by a procmail receipe that will add header lines to allow additional filtering by TB. I'm a bit unsure of the exact syntax TB needs. An example string is: [X-SBClass: Blocked | X-SBClass: Spam | X-SBClass: Bulk]

Re: SPAM Filter

Hi Raj, Historians believe that Monday, September 10, 2001 at 16:05 GMT +0530 was when, Raj [R] typed the following: R> I just wanted to check whether the filter will check for all R> addresses for a particular entry or only the first one. I use that as well. TB looks at all of them, just like

Re: Spam filter

Hello Listers, On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, at 18:19:00 [GMT -0600] (which was 1:19 where I live) Joseph wrote: JN> Is it to filter out known spam sending addresses, or to filter out JN> mail that has or does not have a particular string? Has anyone JN> here had much success? I need to hav

Re: Spam filter

Hi Joseph, @ 7:19:00 PM on 11/14/2001, Joseph N. wrote: JN> What is the concept behind filtering for spam? This has been answered somewhat, but for the record:

Re: Spam Filter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi John, On 12 December 2000 at 19:48:31 +1100 (which was 08:48 where I live) words of wisdom emanated from John Phillips. JP> Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam? These days I get JP> so much rubbish - be a millionaire in 30 days,

Re: Spam Filter

Hi John > Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam? These days I get > so much rubbish - be a millionaire in 30 days, send me money & make > yourself rich, etc., Viagra without a prescription (I sure could do > with some in any case ), etc. etc. > Any one had any success in gettin

Re: Spam Filter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 19:48:31 +1100, John Phillips wrote these words of wisdom: [...] JP> Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam? These days I get JP> so much rubbish - be a millionaire in 30 days, send me money & make JP> yourself rich

Re: Spam Filter

Hello John, In a post time stamped re: "Spam Filter" you wrote: John> Any generic type of filter that will pick up spam? I'm sure you will get a lot of suggestions on this -- some more ingenious than others -- but one simple way is to filter out any email th

Re: Spam Filter

(ACM == "A. Curtis Martin") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ACM> The method Marck and I (among others) have been using is very ACM> effective in two ways. The first is that the method requires ACM> minimal maintenance. The second is that you can examine the spam, ACM> if you like, and report them so t

Spam Filter - Not Spam

I've been using the BayesIT! Spam filter for over a week, long enough to tag quite a few messages as Spam and several as Not Spam. I'm still having a problem with one set of messages. I support several servers. That includes getting messages from the server notifying that a virus wa

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello P.Johnson, Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:55:58 AM, you wrote: PJ> The filter is as follows: PJ> TB! Message Filter PJ> beginFilter PJ> UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08] PJ> Name: K9\20Anti-Spam PJ> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A} PJ> MoveMess

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello P.Johnson, Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:55:58 AM, you wrote: > I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk > folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you > to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for > the purpose of fi

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello P.Johnson & everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 17:11 you (P.Johnson) wrote: > K9 learns and works very quickly Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* > so this is frustrating; don't know wheth

Re: K9 spam filter

Hæ! My filter looks like this: TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [564C1620.01C4B05E.1A441C3F.7FE14B3D] Name: SPAM Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A} MoveMessage folder \5C\5C\5C$JUNK$ MarkRead SetColour 226723330 IsActive Ignore IsSendQueue endFilter and it

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello Code 2 & everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:06 you (Code 2) wrote: ASK>> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK>> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* > They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except fo

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello Thorvald Neumann & everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:00 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote: > Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A} You altered the default header from "spam" to "junk". Unless Pat did that, it won't work for her. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://

Re: K9 spam filter

ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote: ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* BayesFilter catches these for me nicely. It is weak on other mails though :( -- Best regards,

Re: K9 spam filter

Hæ! Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 19:24, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > You altered the default header from "spam" to "junk". Unless Pat did that, > it won't work for her. :-) Ah, yes. I thought my old PopFile-filters would work with K9 when I just changed the header-addition. And guess what, the filte

Re: K9 spam filter

ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote: ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* Hi Alexander, I usually alert the company which email is being abused by sending a mail to [EMA

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello Gerard & everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:44 you (Gerard) wrote: ASK>> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK>> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* > BayesFilter catches these for me nicely. > It is weak on other mails th

Re: K9 spam filter

ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 8:35:09 PM, you wrote: ASK> now it seems to me it is better to let the ASK> whitelisted mails not go to the database since the english language 419 ASK> mails get thru, maybe there'se too little difference... That is how I have set it up. -- Best regards, Gerard

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello P.Johnson & everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 18:51 you (P.Johnson) wrote: ASK>> Is it a common filter? Maybe you've just forgotten to share it with your ASK>> accounts. > I've set up two separate filters for the two accounts, using two slightly > different conditions. And, neither works co

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello Gerard, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 19:44:25 GMT +0100 (which was 19:44:25 where I live), Gerard wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of "K9 spam filter": G> ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote: ASK>> Except for the nigeria conne

Re: K9 spam filter

On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 22:02:04, Dick H. wrote: > That's why I stopped using a Bayes based filter. The spammers are > getting very smart and know their ways to "cheat" these filters. I > installed a challenge/response based spam filter and not a single spam >

Re: K9 spam filter

Hello Jernej, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 22:18:06 GMT +0100 (which was 22:18:06 where I live), Jernej Simoncic wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of "K9 spam filter": JS> On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 22:02:04, Dick H. wrote: >> That's why I sto

Problem with Spam Filter

Hi, I have a filter thus: Name: Spam (Known) Condition: Sender Contains @neco.com.au Action: Delete the Message from the Server Today I received an email from "Neco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". The filter was triggered (the account log says that the email was processed by "Spam (Known)". Problem is, the

Re: Disabling spam filter

jpg is totally insane! They L> change with every mailing on much of this stuff, and filtering on those L> defeats the purpose entirely! You're talking about the Download URL manager, that isn't a spam filter, but gives you the possibility to configure from what sites you want to

Re: Disabling spam filter

On Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 3:56:27 PM, Lynn wrote: > Many have several roots, as many as 5 on the worst. And it is evident > that they change the content from mailing to mailing, so that one > determination is not enough. EBay notices frequently have several; since > various items/vendors are i

Re: Disabling spam filter

Hello Lynn, Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 3:03:21 PM, you wrote: L> If the thing can't be disabled altogether, is it at least possible to L> tell it to block or permit domain names? This business of L> allowing/blocking each individual gif or jpg is totally insane! They L> change with every mailing o

Re: Disabling spam filter

Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009 at 01:05, Lynn wrote: > I'm not seeing an earth icon. > Perhaps I have an alternate skin or toolbox option? More likely, that you have to view a HTML Mail to make it appear. The other way is to customize the Toolbar and set up the Icon yourself. It is in All_A

Re: Disabling spam filter

Hi On Wednesday 28 January 2009 at 4:28:04 AM, in , Jens Franik wrote: > Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009 at 01:05, Lynn wrote: >> I'm not seeing an earth icon. Perhaps I have an >> alternate skin or toolbox option? > More likely, that you have to view a HTML Mail to make > it appear. It only appea

Re: Disabling spam filter

Hi On Tuesday 27 January 2009 at 10:04:47 PM, in , Dwight Corrin wrote: > you can always just allow everything How? (Just curious.) -- Best regards, MFPA Yellow snow is not lemon flavoured Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 __

Re: Disabling spam filter

Hi On Tuesday 27 January 2009 at 11:50:34 PM, in , Stuart Cuddy wrote: > you can de-select the show this window automatically check box. This > will cause TB to ignore HTML pictures and act like TB used to. Brilliant. I saw this window rarely enough that it was only a minor irritation. Now you

A Useful spam filter

Dear Bats Here is a regex spam filter folks might find useful It picks up emails addressed to a whole bunch of people with the same starting letter or the same domain, eg in my case something like. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] . or [EMAIL

Re:A Useful spam filter

RK> Hi Mark, RK> That is a good way to start, but there are more powerful spam filters. RK> SAProxy is a Windows incarnation of SpamAssassin, a very widely used and RK> ... RK> training but seems pretty stable and dependable. I think there are two schools of thought here. I for one prefer to deal

Re:A Useful spam filter

Hello, Friday, June 13, 2003, 1:02:32 AM, you wrote: CK> There's only one problem that I saw, which is CK> negligible. If one receives an e-mail with a large attachment, K9 CK> chews on it for quite some time. You can give it a try here: CK> http://keir.net . I have just checked. The new 1.05 v

Re:A Useful spam filter

Hello, Thursday, June 12, 2003, 11:44:19 PM, you wrote: RK> Hi Mark, RK> On Thursday, June 12, 2003, 23:17:05, Mark wrote: >> Here is a regex spam filter folks might find useful RK> That is a good way to start, but there are more powerful spam filters. RK> [...] I used spamp

Re:A Useful spam filter

>> I want to understand EXACTLY how my mail is triaged and why, >> particularly on my critical accounts. MA> Unfortunately, it is my sad yet considered opinion the choice to do MA> your own filtering is evaporating. My friend told me boastfully about MA> how his Iowa (USA) ISP was "Filtering" his

Re:A Useful spam filter

Hello, Friday, June 13, 2003, 6:49:12 PM, you wrote: MA> >> The filtering system you presented, if I remember correctly, rejects >> all HTML email out of hand. This seems kinda draconian to me. I'll >> bet a lot of those rejections are false positives. POPFile actually >> reads the HTML and

Re:A Useful spam filter

Hello, Friday, June 13, 2003, 7:44:22 PM, you wrote: MA> Fine. Those who created e-mail, and I was present for that, are MA> declared the losers, and those who want to send pretty flowers and MA> silly pink backgrounds with their e-mails (never mind that it gets MA> bloated 10-times necessary

Re:A Useful spam filter

Hello, Friday, June 13, 2003, 8:10:43 PM, you wrote: nwd> Whilst I'm not a moderator of this list, may I remind the majority of you nwd> who are chatting in this thread that this list is about an email program nwd> called "The Bat!", and not Spam filtering, the internet and privacy, and nwd> wha

Re: Spam filter strings?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ztrader, On 27 August 2000 at 16:50:50 GMT -0700 (which was 00:50 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Spam filter strings?": z> I'm a bit unsure of the exact syntax TB needs. An ex

Re: Spam filter strings?

Hello ztrader, On Saturday, August 26, 2000 at 20:27:56 GMT -0700 (which was 8:27 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > Thanks for the tip. I set it up as you suggested. Here's a copy of the > string right out of the 'strings' box: > '[X-SBClass: Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass

Re: Spam filter strings?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ztrader, On 27 August 2000 at 06:32:01 GMT -0700 (which was 14:32 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Spam filter strings?": JA>> I think your filter string is probably to blame

Re: Spam filter strings?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ztrader, On 27 August 2000 at 07:44:08 GMT -0700 (which was 15:44 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Spam filter strings?": MDP>> Exactly. z> OK - got that :-). Might be worth a

Re: Spam filter strings?

Hallo ztrader, On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:44:08 -0700 GMT (27/08/2000, 22:44 +0800 GMT), ztrader wrote: z> OK - got that :-). Might be worth a mention in the help file. Yep. z> Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a z> construct like: z> (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?

Re: Spam filter strings?

Hallo Marck, On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 16:01:49 +0100 GMT (27/08/2000, 23:01 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP> Well, 'A' is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the first MDP> Alternative set while the second alternative set is far more complex MDP> containing three match string

Re: Spam filter strings?

Hi ztrader & Marck, z>> Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a z>> construct like: z>> (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))? > Well, 'A' is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the > first Alternative set while the second alternative set is far > more complex c

Re: Spam filter strings?

Hello ztrader, On Sunday, August 27, 2000 at 18:38:27 GMT -0700 (which was 6:38 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > Now that we've established that it is possible to have complex > conditions in rules, it would be helpful to me to see exactly how it > is implemented in TB, with all

Re: Spam filter strings?

Hello ztrader, On Monday, August 28, 2000 at 07:40:48 GMT -0700 (which was 7:40 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > For a simple OR function, would we have: > '[str A]|[str B]' I think you may be getting confused here. You don't need the apostrophes or the square brackets. Just

Re: Spam filter strings?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Januk, On 28 August 2000 at 12:26:37 GMT -0700 (which was 20:26 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Spam filter strings?": >> For a simple OR function, would we have: >> '[s

Re: Spam filter strings?

Hello ztrader, On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 20:27:56 -0700 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, August 27, 2000, 10:27:56 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, ztrader wrote: > Saturday, August 26, 2000, 5:14:46 PM, you wrote: MDP>> 1) Set up a filter which specifies a match string of '[X-SBClass: MDP>> Block

Ready made Spam filter

Does anyone have a ready made spam filter they could share? Are they importable? For a start, I would like to filter out all that foreign character rubbish that I cannot read...and there are a million other messages I want to avoid. I have already set up an address book called Spam and then a

Anti spam filter setup

Hello list members I need a good advice and some help configure an anti spam filter. How do I do it ? Any Howto that I can read ? I'll appreciate any help. TIA. Using TB! 1.51, M$ win 98 -- __ Archives :

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

Hello Mark, On Monday, November 29, 2004, 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PJ>> The filter is as follows: PJ>> TB! Message Filter PJ>> beginFilter PJ>> UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08] PJ>> Name: K9\20Anti-Spam PJ>> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A}

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

Hi Alexander, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 10:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk >> folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you >> to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for >> th

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

Hi Alexander, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> K9 learns and works very quickly ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* I've received a couple lately and

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

>> K9 learns and works very quickly ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except for spam words like Nigeria, Togo and Centra

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

Hi Alexander, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I've set up two separate filters for the two accounts, using two slightly >> different conditions. And, neither works consistently. It seems strange >> that some mail classified as spam would be moved to the correct f

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

Hello Thorvald, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TN> My filter looks like this: TN> TB! Message Filter TN> beginFilter TN> UID: [564C1620.01C4B05E.1A441C3F.7FE14B3D] TN> Name: SPAM TN> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A} TN> MoveMe

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

Alexander, Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 9:58:20 PM, you wrote: ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't mind. Some of them

Re[3]: K9 spam filter

ASK>> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK>> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* RHS> They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't RHS> mind. Some of them are quite funny, and once in awhile I'll "bite" on R

Wireless, Bat & K9 spam filter

Hi Bat! Fans, Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat & K9, although I can send mail. No problems with dial up or broadband. My settings are:- POP Server 127.0.0.1 log in mail.bigpond.com/110/jp88 password x Am I missing some reason why I cannot download with wireless? I al

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

Hello TBUDL, I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it possible to configure The Bat! to "Filter my email by adding: X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. I have ticked this option in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work with Th

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

> Hello TBUDL, > I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it > possible to configure The Bat! to "Filter my email by adding: > X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. Yes > I have ticked this option > in Configuration/K9 but then am lost a

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

Hallo Granville, On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:03 +0100GMT (26-9-2006, 12:09 , where I live), you wrote: GC> Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a GC> littel more step by step help please? The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to v3, what

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

Hi Granville, on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here), you wrote: GC> I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it GC> possible to configure The Bat! to "Filter my email by adding: GC> X-Text-Classification: - to the Heade

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

> Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a > littel more step by step help please? Click > Account > Sorting Office/Filters Account Drop Down Box: click on Common Filters Click on the funnel top left Right hand side: Name > change 'new filter' to 'K9 Junk' or somet

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

Hello Roelof Otten & everyone else, on 26-Sep-2006 at 17:21 you (Roelof Otten) wrote: > The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to > v3, what Peter suggested can't be done with your 1.62r But only the part with the common filters. He doesn't need to upgrade to v3 to fi

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

On 26 Sep 2006, at 11:09, Marten Gallagher wrote: Hello TBUDL, I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it possible to configure The Bat! to "Filter my email by adding: X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. Yes I have ticked this option in Configurati

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

Hello Granville Cousins & everyone else, on 28-Sep-2006 at 15:41 you (Granville Cousins) wrote: > Where can I find this configuration in The Bat! filters section? I have > looked in there and cannot see any place where I can request The Bat! > to filter my email using the header classification.

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

Hi Granville, on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30.09.2006, 11:41 +0200GMT here), you wrote: GC> Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote: GC> Can you tell me where I can view the "X-Text-Classification: spam" GC> marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!? GC

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

Hallo Granville, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I live), you wrote: GC> Can you tell me where I can view the "X-Text-Classification: spam" GC> marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!? GC> This is just to see that it is working correctly. Pr

Re: Problem with Spam Filter

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000, Grumpy Gamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Today I received an email from "Neco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". The > Oops, list has munged the email. Let's try expanding it out a little: "Neco less than sign newsletter at @ neco dot com dot au greater than sign" -- Re

Re: Problem with Spam Filter

Hallo Chris, On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000GMT (9-6-2008, 19:00 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> Today I received an email from "Neco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". The C> filter was triggered (the account log says that the email was C> processed by "Spam (Known)". That's good, isn't it? ;-) C> P

Re: Problem with Spam Filter

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:15:36 +0200, Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hallo Chris, > >On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000GMT (9-6-2008, 19:00 +0200, where I >live), you wrote: > >C> Today I received an email from "Neco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". The >C> filter was triggered (the account log says

Re: Problem with Spam Filter

Hallo Chris, On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:05:17 +1000GMT (10-6-2008, 10:05 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> I have misunderstood that option in the first place - I thought C> that it looked at the from address while the message was still on C> the server, and then would delete it without needing to

Re: Problem with Spam Filter

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:25:06 +0200, Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well, you do that with selective download filters, those download the >message headers and can kill the message from server before the full >message will be downloaded. >However, I've never used them myself as they length

Re[2]: Disabling spam filter

1/27/2009 RO> You're talking about the Download URL manager, that isn't a spam RO> filter, but gives you the possibility to configure from what sites you RO> want to see the pictures and from what sites not. RO> Don't select the individual messages, but their root when choosing to RO> allo

Re[2]: Disabling spam filter

1/27/2009 DC> you can always just allow everything I am thinking that will have to be it, and I'm sure I won't have to wait long before I see it again. I haven't even been able to find a way to bring the wretched thing up independently! I didn't think I was any stupider than usual, but I've real

Re[2]: Disabling spam filter

1/27/2009 SC> If you are referring to the URL manager then you can disable it entirely or call SC> it up as needed. I was, yes. SC> To open it click on the earth icon on the header bar and select Show URL SC> Manager. There you can de-select the show this window automatically check

Re[3]: Disabling spam filter

Hello Lynn, Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 6:05:21 PM, you wrote: L> I discovered this accidentally a few minutes after I answered the last L> mail. At least I found the checkbox; I'm not seeing an earth icon. L> Perhaps I have an alternate skin or toolbox option? It only appears when you are viewing

Best spam filter for TB!

little too cautious about it since K9 hasn't been upgraded in years and never acted like malware in the past. Anyway, the long and short of this message is a request to learn what this group thinks is a good spam filter for TB! today. We are both running v6.xx and Windows 10. Much thanks for any a

pre-made spam filter download?

Is there a pre-made spam filter which i download and install into thebat? Anyway i hope that something like in mozilla 1.3 mailreader will come in futher releases of thebat. A junk tagging system that in time learns to spot new junkmail would be a great improvement. Kate

pre-made spam filter download?

Does the vampire plugin use some kind of autolearning or is it a rulebased filter system? If it's rulebased where can i get predefined sets of rules? Kate Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBU

Re: A Useful spam filter

Hi Mark, On Thursday, June 12, 2003, 23:17:05, Mark wrote: > Here is a regex spam filter folks might find useful [...] That is a good way to start, but there are more powerful spam filters. SAProxy is a Windows incarnation of SpamAssassin, a very widely used and thoroughly perfected spam fil

Re: A Useful spam filter

> I want to understand EXACTLY how my mail is triaged and why, > particularly on my critical accounts. Unfortunately, it is my sad yet considered opinion the choice to do your own filtering is evaporating. My friend told me boastfully about how his Iowa (USA) ISP was "Filtering" his mail with a

Re: A Useful spam filter

> Zero replies and zero comments on my earlier list post, > which although posted in good spirit with a 3-hour compose > time, was evidently a waste of time in the minds of the > target audience, eh? Not so fast Mike. Just because there wasn't a long thread full of replies and opinions doesn't mea

Re: A Useful spam filter

Good day to everyone, You are going to laugh, but I signed up to this list just a day or two ago in order to find out a few things about TB in order to perfect the anti-spam mechnism that I just developed. Not really developed, just added a few final touches to known techniques. The resulting thin

Re: A Useful spam filter

On Thu 12-Jun-03 7:02pm -0400, Csaba Kiss wrote: Csaba, you seem to be having a few macro problems. (1) The `Re:` in your subject line is not separated from the real subject. (2) You appear to be deleting the "In-Reply-To" line in the Kludges - this destroys threading (you also have no "Refere

Re: A Useful spam filter

> It's easy to get jaded when you do something for the common > good with little or no return. Trust me, I know. This is a busy list. Thanks for your comments. Jaded is indeed a good word for what I was feeling at the time my reply was written. I would add only that to work as designed, and after

Re: A Useful spam filter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mike, @12-Jun-2003, 19:05 -0400 (00:05 UK time) Mike Apsey [MA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said >> I want to understand EXACTLY how my mail is triaged and why, >> particularly on my critical accounts. MA> Unfortunately, it is my sad yet considered

  1   2   3   >