Like a lot of other folks, I've not been able to get through to RulesEmporium
for a while now.
Personally - I run RDJ by hand, once or twice a week (depending upon amount of
spam getting through), and find that usually does the trick ... but not any
more. Even this limited amount of activity
they wouldn't gain anything by using them.
However, what you might gain is the redundancy if (in fantasy world) every
user was also serving them out via bittorrent.
I was just mulling over in my head a hypothetical BittorrentMirror client.
The idea being to mirror a group of files (rulesemporium rules
bittorrent.
I was just mulling over in my head a hypothetical
BittorrentMirror client. The idea being to mirror a group of
files (rulesemporium rules, the whole site, etc).
I'll bring this up again: coral.
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website won't work
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website won't work? Granted, coral is also intended for large files,
but it is distributed and is almost transparent...
Well right now, www.rulesemporium.com came up in a few
them out via bittorrent.
I was just mulling over in my head a hypothetical
BittorrentMirror client. The idea being to mirror a group of
files (rulesemporium rules, the whole site, etc).
I'll bring this up again: coral.
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website won't work? Granted, coral is also intended for large files,
but it is distributed and is almost transparent...
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
http://www.rulseemporium.com.nyud.net:8080/
crap. That should of course be:
http://www.rulesemporium.com.nyud.net:8080/
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:03:07AM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
I'll bring this up again: coral.
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website won't work? Granted, coral is also intended for large files,
but it is distributed and is almost
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:03:07AM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
I'll bring this up again: coral.
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website won't work? Granted, coral is also intended for large files,
but it is distributed and is almost transparent...
Because
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:03:07AM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
I'll bring this up again: coral.
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website won't work? Granted, coral is also intended for large files,
but it
them out via bittorrent.
I was just mulling over in my head a hypothetical
BittorrentMirror client. The idea being to mirror a group of
files (rulesemporium rules, the whole site, etc).
I'll bring this up again: coral.
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website
Simon Standley wrote:
Like a lot of other folks, I've not been able to get through to RulesEmporium
for a while now.
Personally - I run RDJ by hand, once or twice a week (depending upon amount of
spam getting through), and find that usually does the trick ... but not any
more. Even
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
website won't work? Granted, coral is also intended for large files,
but it is distributed and is
Henrik Krohns skrev:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:44:37PM -0400, Phil Barnett wrote:
We can't be the first people to come up against this problem. How have others
solved it?
Bunch'o'Mirrors? Crude and effective.
*raise a hand* I volonteer to mirror, I have lots of both hd and bw
capacity to
Phil Barnett writes:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
There has been discussion of taking down the public site, opening
something new ( private access, invite only, acl by ip, etc), in hopes
to avoid ddos and provide better services, more requent rule updates,
and so on.
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Phil Barnett writes:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
There has been discussion of taking down the public site, opening
something new ( private access, invite only, acl by ip, etc), in hopes
to avoid ddos and provide better
Phil Barnett writes:
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Phil Barnett writes:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
There has been discussion of taking down the public site, opening
something new ( private access, invite only, acl by ip, etc), in hopes
to
Phil Barnett wrote:
How about releasing the ruleset via torrent or something similar. Anything
that you could do to distribute the load and location would make a ddos
attack less effective. While there might not be a lot of people on this list
who can use their server to take on the entire
If your IP is blocked, for whatever reason, perhaps a proxy would help
you until your IP is unblocked.
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rulesemporium.com%2Flangpair=fr%7Cen
I bet the 'donate' link would help :-)
Hmm, I doubt it, seeing that SARE has received 3
Mike Grau wrote:
If your IP is blocked, for whatever reason, perhaps a proxy would
help you until your IP is unblocked.
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rulesemporium.com%2Flangpair=fr%7Cen
I bet the 'donate' link would help :-)
Hmm, I doubt it, seeing that
Mike Grau wrote:
If your IP is blocked, for whatever reason, perhaps a proxy would
help you until your IP is unblocked.
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rulesemporium.com%2Flangpair=fr%7Cen
I bet the 'donate' link would help :-)
Hmm, I doubt it, seeing that
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Henrik Krohns skrev:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:44:37PM -0400, Phil Barnett wrote:
We can't be the first people to come up against this problem. How
have others solved it?
Bunch'o'Mirrors? Crude and effective.
*raise a hand* I volonteer to mirror, I have lots of
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
I've been having intermittent issues getting there from home for a
while. Last time it happened, the site was down. I still can't get
there
Hum. I just tried again, and didn't have any
As I said, we use a trick that makes the fetches work. It does not get
us tarred by the DoS filter. So access to the web site is really easy.
I also check when I feel like it rather than hourly as I've heard some
people work. Weekly is more than enough unless you see a notification
here.
Hi!
Wouldn't you say the DDOS protection theory and/or implementation is broken
if topology and routing is not taken into account?
You know, we are not posting to this list to rag on them, we just wanna be
able to hit the website for info when necessary and without being tossed in
the crapper
://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is
almost useless.
I've been having intermittent issues getting there from home for a
while. Last time it happened, the site was down. I still can't get
, but if you do it just right, you can browse the whole site
before the IDS blocks you. /sarcasm
The rulesemporium site is great, and much thanks goes to the ninjas who
operate it and write the rules, forcing spammers to read harry potter
books.
Ken
Yes, the rulesemporium site _is_ great
.
It's tricky, but if you do it just right, you can browse the whole
site before the IDS blocks you. /sarcasm
The rulesemporium site is great, and much thanks goes to the ninjas
who operate it and write the rules, forcing spammers to read harry
potter books.
Ken
Yes, the rulesemporium site
If your IP is blocked, for whatever reason, perhaps a proxy would help
you until your IP is unblocked.
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rulesemporium.com%2Flangpair=fr%7Cen
I bet the 'donate' link would help :-)
Ken
Okay, done. We'll see if it helps.
Mike
button
again. It's tricky, but if you do it just right, you can browse the
whole site before the IDS blocks you. /sarcasm
The rulesemporium site is great, and much thanks goes to the ninjas
who operate it and write the rules, forcing spammers to read harry
potter books.
Ken
Yes
Robert - eLists wrote:
Praise God Almighty!
We were able to spend more than a few seconds and many click on the
rulesemporium website.
Awesome.
As it says, was it moved over to vr.org ???
A couple years ago... yup. Which is now netactuate.com
--
Dallas Engelken
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
There has been discussion of taking down the public site, opening
something new ( private access, invite only, acl by ip, etc), in hopes
to avoid ddos and provide better services, more requent rule updates,
and so on. We are trying our best
On 7/12/2007 12:50 AM, Phil Barnett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
There has been discussion of taking down the public site, opening
something new ( private access, invite only, acl by ip, etc), in hopes
to avoid ddos and provide better services, more requent rule
Phil Barnett wrote:
How about releasing the ruleset via torrent or something similar. Anything
that you could do to distribute the load and location would make a ddos
attack less effective. While there might not be a lot of people on this list
who can use their server to take on the entire
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 7/12/2007 12:50 AM, Phil Barnett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
There has been discussion of taking down the public site, opening
something new ( private access, invite only, acl by ip, etc), in hopes
to avoid
At 04:00 PM 7/11/2007, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
hey
great ideas - who volunteers to setup the Torrent stuff and manage it all ?
I wouldn't know how to do that, but would be willing to offer some of
my tiny server and bandwidth to the cause.
Current system is OS X Server, but will be
From: Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 7/12/2007 12:50 AM, Phil Barnett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
There has been discussion of taking down the public site, opening
something new ( private access, invite only,
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedLoren
Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again
At 04:57 AM Tuesday, 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote -=
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic
from the ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to
www.rulesemporium.com for anyone that is having problems.
The issue with the html found in rulesets (the 0.1 refresh
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic from
the ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to www.rulesemporium.com for
anyone that is having problems.
# traceroute www.rulesemporium.com
traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (209.200.135.151), 30 hops max, 40 byte
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
I've been having intermittent issues getting there from home for a
while. Last time it happened, the site was down. I still can't get
there
Hum. I just tried again, and didn't have
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Ed Kasky wrote:
6 te-3-4.car3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.110.113) 647.873
ms 743.477 ms 1185.795 ms
7 ae-2-56.bbr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.102.161) 1186.617 ms
ae-2-54.bbr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.102.97) 1187.442 ms
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 07:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
At 04:57 AM Tuesday, 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote -=
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic from the
ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to www.rulesemporium.com for anyone
that is having
dendarii ~ # traceroute www.rulesemporium.com
traceroute to unknown.prolexic.com (209.200.135.151), 30 hops max, 38
byte packets
1 athena (10.1.0.254) 0.442 ms 0.258 ms 0.242 ms
2 * * *
3 P6-7.LCR-01.STTLWA.verizon-gni.net (130.81.35.128) 18.870 ms
18.744 ms 18.676 ms
4
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 14:15 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 07:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
At 04:57 AM Tuesday, 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote -=
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic from the
ddos yet.. I'd like some
Duane Hill wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 07:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
At 04:57 AM Tuesday, 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote -=
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic from
the ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to www.rulesemporium.com
for anyone
At 04:57 AM 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic
from the ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to
www.rulesemporium.com for anyone that is having problems.
From my Windows machine...
Tracing route to www.rulesemporium.com
From: Robert - eLists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
Mike,
Almost???
Bwahh... that is a good one.
You are far too kind...
- rh
Gee, it just worked for me tickety-boo. But then I have fixed my tool.
which uses wget, to
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loren Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via
jdow wrote:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So
://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
I've been having intermittent issues getting there from home for a
while. Last time it happened, the site was down. I still can't get
there
Hum. I just
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I
jdow wrote:
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loren Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get
jdow wrote:
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having
As I said, we use a trick that makes the fetches work. It does not get
us tarred by the DoS filter. So access to the web site is really easy.
I also check when I feel like it rather than hourly as I've heard some
people work. Weekly is more than enough unless you see a notification
here. I
...
Is it really the size of the pipe(s) or the network processing horsepower or
the new topology.
It appears that the topology to reach rulesemporium has changed since they
took over the site transport and transit.
- rh
As has been noted already, by Dallas, it's a problem with at least one
of their network links being saturated by the DoS, not the DoS protection.
Daryl
Daryl
Wouldn't you say the DDOS protection theory and/or implementation is broken
if topology and routing is not taken into account?
Praise God Almighty!
We were able to spend more than a few seconds and many click on the
rulesemporium website.
Awesome.
As it says, was it moved over to vr.org ???
- rh
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
Just worked for me.
Loren
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
At 02:01 PM Monday, 7/9/2007, Joe Zitnik wrote -=
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I have one server that is fine but a second that keeps stalling on
different rules. On the first attempt it froze on
99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
I've been having
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
Mike,
Almost???
Bwahh... that is a good one.
You are far too kind...
- rh
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
I've been having
Loren Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/07 5:15 PM
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:30:25 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Same here :(
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:28:51 -0400, Joe Zitnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it having troubles again? I'm having problems reaching the site.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
Same here :(
He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
wouldn't get a DoS attack?
That's what happens when you do good work. :(
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:38:48 -0700, Jerry Durand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
Same here :(
He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
wouldn't get a DoS attack?
That's what happens when you do good work. :(
True
On 6/29/2007 5:38 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
Same here :(
He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
wouldn't get a DoS attack?
That's what happens when you do good work. :(
nah... he DOS'd himself
will be
Is it having troubles again? I'm having problems reaching the site.
Same here :(
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:28:51 -0400, Joe Zitnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it having troubles again? I'm having problems reaching the site.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP
On 6/29/2007 5:53 PM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:38:48 -0700, Jerry Durand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
Same here :(
He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
wouldn't get a DoS attack?
That's
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 16:36 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Is it worth adding mirrors for the rules? I'm more than happy to do so
and can probably rope in a few others.
I should imagine a fair few others on list would be prepared to act as
mirrors too.
It's worth mentioning that, as someone
On 6/29/2007 5:53 PM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:38:48 -0700, Jerry Durand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
Same here :(
He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
wouldn't get a DoS attack?
That's
a delisting of each?
2) I see from the archives this was also a problem when the
rulesemporium domain wasn't renewed last year - has anybody
implemented auto back-off behavior for rules_du_jour? It seems to be
too aggressive in these cases.
3) I didn't have a cronjob in to do updates ... would
a time interval or should I
request a delisting of each?
2) I see from the archives this was also a problem when the
rulesemporium domain wasn't renewed last year - has anybody implemented
auto back-off behavior for rules_du_jour? It seems to be too aggressive
in these cases.
3) I didn't have
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 6/7/2007 2:52 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work! I assume we can re-enable sa-update for
tonight's run.
Thanks
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work! I assume we can re-enable
On 6/9/2007 6:50 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work! I assume we can re-enable
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 6/9/2007 6:50 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work!
Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
DDoS protection.
Great news and good work! I assume we can re-enable sa-update for
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 6/9/2007 6:50 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special thanks to Prolexic (http://www.prolexic.com) for the
Gene Heskett schrieb:
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 6/9/2007 6:50 PM, Jerry Durand wrote:
At 09:19 AM 6/9/2007, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rulesemporium.com will be coming back online at approximately 1800
GMT. Special
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's happening?
- --
Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 07:28 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's happening?
Apparently a DDOS
Steven Stern wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's happening?
- --
Same issue here. 404 errors.
smime.p7s
Description:
On 6/7/2007 2:52 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's happening?
- --
Same issue
jp wrote:
Does anyone know how to get the replacements for the 88_FVGT* rules?
I was trying to update them and the ones at www.rulesemporium.com
refer to a new numbering system that starts with 00_FVGT. Those files
don't exist. Rulesemporium is the master site for the the files
according
Title: RE: Rulesemporium rules
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Findlay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:38 AM
To: Dan Horne
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rulesemporium rules
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:43:58PM -0400, Dan Horne
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why the updates on the
rulesmporium rules have dropped so drastically lately? I understand
that the authors all have other things to do, and I am EXTREMELY
GRATEFUL for all their hard work. I was just wondering if there were
any other reasons.
Title: RE: Rulesemporium rules
-Original Message-
From: Joe Zitnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 1:39 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Rulesemporium rules
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why the updates
A simple no would have sufficed.
On 10/10/2006 at 4:25 PM, Chris Santerre
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Zitnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 1:39 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Rulesemporium rules
Just out
Joe Zitnik wrote:
A simple no would have sufficed.
It wouldn't have been as amusing though :)
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Quality Business Hosting Colocation
http://www.blacknight.ie/
Tel. 1850 927 280
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 59
Title: RE: Rulesemporium rules
Joe Zitnik wrote:
A simple no would have sufficed.
It wouldn't have been as amusing though :)
LOL, Joe don't get upset. You obviously haven't seen enough of my posts to know what I'm like. :)
We have been testing new stuff all the time. There just
10) Making top ten lists.
Hilarious. Can I subscribe to those top ten lists with RDJ?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review,
:39 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Rulesemporium rules
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why the updates on the
rulesmporium rules have dropped so drastically lately? I
understand
that the authors all have other things to do, and I am EXTREMELY
GRATEFUL for all their hard
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why the updates on the
rulesmporium rules have dropped so drastically lately? I understand
that the authors all have other things to do, and I am EXTREMELY
GRATEFUL for all their hard work. I was just wondering if there were
any other reasons.
Nope,
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
