Theo Van Dinter wrote:
FWIW, it happens to be the "official" tool since no one ever submitted
RDJ to be the official tool, so we had to write our own.
I would have offered, had I known there was any interest.
Chris T.
Jo Rhett wrote:
Is there any difference here that I'm overlooking? Any advantage to RDJ?
And leading to my next point, given that sa-update is working fine --
isn't rdj going to be slimmed down to just the part that restarts the
process after running sa-update?
Hi Jo,
I'm the author of RDJ
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
To start, again, I have *nothing* against RDJ. I just like things to be
as efficient as practical (it's how I live and make a living), which is
why I like sa-update. I'll explain why sa-update is more efficient...
[snip]
Thank you very much for the detailed response
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> To start, again, I have *nothing* against RDJ. I just like things to
> be as efficient as practical (it's how I live and make a living),
> which is why I like sa-update. I'll explain why sa-update is more
> efficient...
I wasn't intending to advocate either. I was j
To start, again, I have *nothing* against RDJ. I just like things to be
as efficient as practical (it's how I live and make a living), which is
why I like sa-update. I'll explain why sa-update is more efficient...
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I don't know that there is much difference in the config
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> They are both good. RDJ was made to deal with third party rulesets
> and it does a good job. sa-update was made to deal with official
> ruleset updates and has been extended to also handle third party
> rulesets.
That's not exactly
Jo Rhett wrote:
> Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of
> real interest to me...
>
> Jo Rhett wrote:
> > Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
> > insights different than what I have observed.
> >
> > SA-Update seems to require less conf
This is why I didn't bother, and used sa-update instead.
I'm wondering if there is anything I'm missing...
Yes. Its not /etc/spamassassin/local.cf you add lines to. Rather, it
is /etc/rulesdujour/config.
Mine looks like:
ext1:~# cat /etc/rulesdujour/config
TRUSTE
Jo Rhett wrote:
According to the home page for the script
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
names of the rulesets you chose. Example below:
You missed the previous line:
Create a blank configuration file
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 12:14 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> According to the home page for the script
> http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
>
> > Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
> > names of the rulesets you
... snip ...
According to the home page for the script
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
names of the rulesets you chose. Example below:
* TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_
31 AM, Kelson wrote:
Me three. As many changes as I've made to local.cf, none of them
had anything to do with RDJ.
According to the home page for the script
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
na
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did
you have to change?
Reading RDJ setup, it kept mentioning that I would have to add
statements to local.conf for each and every ruleset that I imported.
This is why I didn'
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
Last month this topic blew up into a flame fest. I compltely
understand why
no on wants in on this again.
Oops. I should have checked the archive.
Short answer: use what you like.
Of course. I was just wondering if there was certain w
Jake Vickers wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you
have to change?
...
I use RDJ myself, and also did not add anything to my local.cf to make
it work. I adjusted some scores, but that was all.
Me three. As many changes as I've made
Tim Litwiller wrote:
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you
have to change?
Jo Rhett wrote:
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of
real interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone h
Title: RE: sa-update versus rulesdujour questions
>
>
> Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic
> is of real
> interest to me...
Last month this topic blew up into a flame fest. I compltely understand why no on wants in on this again.
Short
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you
have to change?
Jo Rhett wrote:
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of
real interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights diffe
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of real
interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights different than what I have observed.
SA-Update seems to require less configuration changes. In short, all I
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights different than what I have observed.
SA-Update seems to require less configuration changes. In short, all
I did was make a file with a list of rulefiles that SA-Update should
check, and everything worked without a
#Ronan McGlue wrote:
> can someone give me a listing of the latest timestamps regarding their
> rulesdujour updates?
> I've just noticed that none of the files have been updated on my
> machine since mid augaust... surely this isn't normal...
>
> thanks
>
> Ro
#Ronan McGlue wrote:
> can someone give me a listing of the latest timestamps regarding their
> rulesdujour updates?
> I've just noticed that none of the files have been updated on my
> machine since mid augaust... surely this isn't normal...
No, it's fairly normal.
can someone give me a listing of the latest timestamps regarding their
rulesdujour updates?
I've just noticed that none of the files have been updated on my machine
since mid augaust... surely this isn't normal...
thanks
Ronan
--
Ronan McGlue
Analyst / Programmer
CMC Systems Gro
Anders Norrbring schrieb:
Matthias Haegele skrev:
Hello!
Accidently (or foolishly) i didnt deactivitate "wrong" rules in config
of RulesDuJour [1]. from site: rulesemporium [2].
Now i have some rules in my /etc/spamassassin/ not for my SA-Version [3]
namely: the *pre25*.cf pr
Hello there!
After downloading and "installing" RulesDuJour" i get the following message:
Any hints?:
spamassassin --lint
[568] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 1
I didnt implement rewrite_subject, only rewrite header iirc.
[568] warn: config:
BG Mahesh wrote:
> hi
>
> /etc/rulesdujour/config reads,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RulesDuJour]# more /etc/rulesdujour/config
> TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1 SARE_URI0
> SARE_URI1"
There are quite a few good rule sets fr
On Tuesday August 15 2006 12:41 pm, BG Mahesh wrote:
> hi
>
> /etc/rulesdujour/config reads,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RulesDuJour]# more /etc/rulesdujour/config
> TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1
> SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1"
> SA_DIR="
hi/etc/rulesdujour/config reads,[EMAIL PROTECTED] RulesDuJour]# more /etc/rulesdujour/config TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1 SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1"SA_DIR="/etc/mail/spamassassin"
MAIL_ADDRESS="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"SA_RESTART="kill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
(just pulling this out of the other thread ... my bad)
> Are you using the updated version OR the one originally posted?
>
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup *plugin* updates a
I don't administer the SonicWall personally, but it has a "pro-active" web
filter, using rules that nobody here completely comprehends, to block
categories of Web Content.
The category that this URL was hitting was "Free Software Downloads".
We're a fairly small organization so it's easy for
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 09:19 -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
> I have found the problem: "Never underestimate the power of your own systems
> to make you feel dumb!".
>
> It seems that our SonicWall firewall, sometime recently, had decided that
> this
> was a forbidden site, so the "403" error was d
I have found the problem: "Never underestimate the power of your own systems
to make you feel dumb!".
It seems that our SonicWall firewall, sometime recently, had decided that this
was a forbidden site, so the "403" error was due to my own firewall blocking
access.
Have since "unblocked" the
My cron job runs once a day, at 21:15.
I just tried it, manually, and still get:
Rules Du Jour Run Summary:RulesDuJour Run Summary on strongbad:
The following rules had errors:
William Stearn's RANDOM WORD Ruleset was not retrieved because of: 403 from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blac
Thanks! That's what I was looking for. I couldn't find it by greping.
It was in the rulesdujour/config file.
Tracey Gates
Lead Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1350 South Boulder, Third Floor / Tulsa, OK 74119-3203
Phone 918-663-0991 / Fax 918-663-0840
This communication is intended on
NXM" is listed as
> > "SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM". I can't seem to find a file that
> > contains the URI2 that is not commented out and the POISON spelled
> > wrong.
> >
> > What file could these be in for me to correct these issues?
>
> /etc/rul
"SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM". I can't seem to find a file that
> contains the URI2 that is not commented out and the POISON
> spelled wrong.
>
> What file could these be in for me to correct these issues?
> >
> >
> >
> > Tracey Gates
> > Lead D
you have
received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and
then delete the message from your computer system immediately.
-Original Message-
From: David Filion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 3:55 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rule
Tracey Gates wrote:
I'm getting the following messages from the RulesDuJour run:
RulesDuJour Run Summary on yoursummit.com:
No index found for ruleset named ARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM. Check that this
ruleset is still valid.
SARE Top 200 spamcop ip addresses Ruleset (automatically generated
I'm getting the following messages from the RulesDuJour run:
RulesDuJour Run Summary on yoursummit.com:
No index found for ruleset named ARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM. Check that this
ruleset is still valid.
SARE Top 200 spamcop ip addresses Ruleset (automatically generated) has
chang
About a week ago I started seeing:
>> The following rules had errors:
>> William Stearn's RANDOM WORD Ruleset was not retrieved because of: 403 from
>> http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/random.current.cf.
I ignored it for awhile, because I've seen transient problems with some of th
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:26:25AM +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have to disable
> the SPF list from RDJ also, thank you.
FWIW, rules that require plugins should be wrapped in "ifplugin/endif"
containers. Especially if those rules are b
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Freitag, 24. März 2006 09:01 Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Is the SPF plugin enabled? The syntax looks fine, but it can't be
parsed if the plugin isn't loaded.
ARghl. I should not work late night... Thanks.
As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have
On Freitag, 24. März 2006 09:01 Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Is the SPF plugin enabled? The syntax looks fine, but it can't be
> parsed if the plugin isn't loaded.
ARghl. I should not work late night... Thanks.
As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have to disable
the SPF list
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Anybody else got this problem? Lots of warnings suddenly.
mfg zmi
[31721] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
whitelist_from_spf[EMAIL PROTECTED] [31721] warn: config:
failed to parse line, skipping: whitelist_from_spf
Is the SPF plugin enabled? T
Anybody else got this problem? Lots of warnings suddenly.
mfg zmi
-- Forwarded message from root: --
Subject: RulesDuJour/power2u: 'spamassassin --lint' failed. Please fix
your SpamAssassin configuration.
Date: Freitag, 24. März 2006 05:08
***NOTICE***: spamassas
Jim Smith wrote:
> > I would suggest that you do as the error says and check your CRON.
> >
> > What do you get from 'crontab -l'?
> >
> Nothing very telling:
>
> 0 2 * * * /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/rules_du_jour
Once a day shouldn
> I would suggest that you do as the error says and check your CRON.
>
> What do you get from 'crontab -l'?
>
Nothing very telling:
#0 0 * * * /usr/local/urchin/urchin -q
0 6 * * * /bin/sh /home/find_quar
0 2 * * * /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/rules_du_jour
Jim Smith wrote:
> I started using the rulesDuJour for a couple of weeks and decided to
> set it up on a cron job. For unknown reasons, I was never successful
> at setting it on a cron. So I went back to manual but now that
> doesn't work as well. I fear that when I was testing it
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 07:35
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Have I been banned from rulesdujour?
>
> I started using the rulesDuJour for a couple of weeks and
> decided to
I started using the rulesDuJour for a couple of weeks and decided to set it
up on a cron job. For unknown reasons, I was never successful at setting it
on a cron. So I went back to manual but now that doesn't work as well. I
fear that when I was testing it on the cron, I went over some limi
I'm having a problem with spamd not restarting after a rule
update. I have noticed it fails to restart via RulesDuJour
after the SARE Stocks Ruleset is changed (every time) and
occasionally on others.
I was wondering if anyone else is having the problem?
Here is the update notice I get:
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 15:01 +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 11:42 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> > Yousef Raffah wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> > >> Hi Yousef,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the interne
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 11:42 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> Yousef Raffah wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> >> Hi Yousef,
> >>
> >>
> >>> I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
> >>> not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to cha
Yousef Raffah wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
Hi Yousef,
I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to change the line
in /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
To this:
[ "${CURL_OPTS}" ]
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> Hi Yousef,
>
>
> >
> > I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
> > not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to change the line
> > in /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
> > To this:
> > [ "${CURL_OPT
Title: RE: RulesDuJour Recommendation
>
> Yea...those are really good. I didn't mention them as they
> are enabled
> by default in the latest SA versions. At least, they are if
> the network
> tests in general are enabled.
>
URIBL isn't on by default. Ju
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 07:47 am, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> Don't forget to use URIBL and SURBL Joey. They will stop a ton of spam.
Indeed they do, but..
If you are one of those poor souls who are still using dialup AND you have to
restart your system while offline, spamassassin will not s
Joey wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting worse.
> In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using RulesDuJour.
> What I would like to know is which rules are you using without too much
> headache so that we
Loren Wilton wrote:
> > These are the ones that I use. I haven't had any problems with
> > them.
> >
> > SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
> > SARE_GENLSUBJ0
> > SARE_HTML0
> > SARE_HEADER0
> > SARE_OBFU0
> > SARE_URI0
>
> I would add that most people could probably run the "1" versions of
> the above "0" rule
> These are the ones that I use. I haven't had any problems with them.
>
> SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
> SARE_GENLSUBJ0
> SARE_HTML0
> SARE_HEADER0
> SARE_OBFU0
> SARE_URI0
I would add that most people could probably run the "1" versions of the
above "0" rule files *in addition to the "0" version* with abs
> I am, and have been for a while, using SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_HTML
> SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM TRIPWIRE EVILNUMBERS SARE_RANDOM SARE_WHITELIST
> SARE_OBFU SARE_STOCKS SARE_SPOOF to good effect (though someone will
> probably tell me that at least one of those is no longer advisable).
Nope, all s
Chris Santerre wrote:
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Joey wrote:
> > >
> > > As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting
> > > worse. In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using
> > > RulesDuJour.
Title: RE: RulesDuJour Recommendation
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:09 AM
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: RE: RulesDuJour Recommendation
>
>
> Joey wrote:
> >
> > As I
Hi Yousef,
I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to change the line
in /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
To this:
[ "${CURL_OPTS}" ] || CURL_OPTS="-w %{http_code} --compressed -O -R -s
-S -z -x proxy.nour.net.
Joey wrote:
>
> As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting
> worse. In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using
> RulesDuJour. What I would like to know is which rules are you using
> without too much headache so that we can implement them into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting worse.
> In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using RulesDuJour.
> What I would like to know is which rules are you us
Hello everyone,
As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting worse.
In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using RulesDuJour.
What I would like to know is which rules are you using without too much
headache so that we can implement them into our configurati
Hello Everyone,
I'm quite new to SA and RulesDuJour however, I'm assuming I have it all
set up properly except for the Rules update.
I have set RulesDuJour to update through cron but I keep on getting
these error messages:
The following rules had errors:
TripWire had an unknown error:
p://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/random.current.cf
CF_FILE=random.current.cf
CF_NAME=William Stearn's RANDOM WORD Ruleset
PARSE_NEW_VER_SCRIPT=grep -i '^#release' | tail -1
CF_MUNGE_SCRIPT=
Old random.current.cf already existed
in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour...
Retrievin
On Sunday 04 December 2005 22:46, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
>--max-conn-per-child=50
?? Thats also odd, 3.04 has been running just fine with that single
dash option for at least 6 months. Wierd. Anyway I put it back in
like above, and that works. Now to figure out why, with a -m5 setting,
its only
From: "Bob McClure Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 10:41:07PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings folks;
I just installed RulesDuJour, and ran it once by hand. It wasn't
labeling the subject line, so I edited my local.cf to turn that on,
didn't chang
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greetings folks;
I just installed RulesDuJour, and ran it once by hand. It wasn't
labeling the subject line, so I edited my local.cf to turn that on,
didn't change anything else, but now a 'service spamd restart'
fai
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 10:41:07PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings folks;
>
> I just installed RulesDuJour, and ran it once by hand. It wasn't
> labeling the subject line, so I edited my local.cf to turn that on,
> didn't change anything else, but now a '
Greetings folks;
I just installed RulesDuJour, and ran it once by hand. It wasn't
labeling the subject line, so I edited my local.cf to turn that on,
didn't change anything else, but now a 'service spamd restart'
fails with this error message nomograph:
Starting spamd: [20
:46
> Aan: Thijs Koetsier | Exception
> CC: Fred; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Onderwerp: Re[2]: RulesDuJour; lint failes
>
> Hello Thijs,
>
> Saturday, September 24, 2005, 12:00:14 AM, you wrote:
>
> TKE> To lint spamassassin from the command line has no other
&g
Hello Thijs,
Saturday, September 24, 2005, 12:00:14 AM, you wrote:
TKE> To lint spamassassin from the command line has no other effect than through
TKE> RulesDuJour. The same list of errors/warnings shows up as mentioned below.
TKE> Since I use a standard (clean) installation with only
To lint spamassassin from the command line has no other effect than
through
RulesDuJour. The same list of errors/warnings shows up as mentioned below.
Since I use a standard (clean) installation with only Tripwire in my
ruleset for
testing, this amount of warnings is a bit big, isn't it?
B
To lint spamassassin from the command line has no other effect than through
RulesDuJour. The same list of errors/warnings shows up as mentioned below.
Since I use a standard (clean) installation with only Tripwire in my
ruleset for
testing, this amount of warnings is a bit big, isn't it?
Run spamassassin --lint on this server and fix the errors you have and then
once all is running well, go back and try rulesDuJour. You'll get better
results for sure :)
Thijs Koetsier | Exception wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No, I did not.
> I just re-installed Rules Du Jour and am using
n.apache.org
> Onderwerp: Re: RulesDuJour; lint failes
>
> Did you just move from 2.64 or earlier? It looks like you have some
> pre-3.0-only rules files. SOme of these appear to be standard SA
> rules files.
>
> Loren
>
> - Original Message -
>
5:02 AM
Subject: RulesDuJour; lint failes
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using spamassassin 3 with rules du jour.
>
> Since a few days, when my rules du jour is runned by cron, spamassassin
> won't lint the rules anymore. I've looked into this problem on various
> sites,
still have the same problems. So perhaps someone here knows what to do?
my /etc/rulesdujour/config:
TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE"
SA_DIR="/etc/mail/spamassassin"
MAIL_ADDRESS="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SA_RESTART="/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart"
(I&
Hiya Thijs,
Thijs Koetsier | Exception IT wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using spamassassin 3.0.4-2 on Debian 3.1 with Exim4, together with
RulesDuJour.
I have a question about the last, which I just installed for the first time.
I believe it's a fairly beginners-one, which I hope someone c
Hi all,
I'm using spamassassin 3.0.4-2 on Debian 3.1 with Exim4, together with
RulesDuJour.
I have a question about the last, which I just installed for the first time.
I believe it's a fairly beginners-one, which I hope someone can help me
with.
In the config-file of rulesdu
Jason Marshall wrote:
Yes! You should be able to add these directly to the config file in
the same way you are (I believe) currently adding them to the
built-in registry.
Thanks, Chris, do they just get added to the bottom, or do they need
to be contained in some kind of $variable="" decla
Yes! You should be able to add these directly to the config file in the same
way you are (I believe) currently adding them to the built-in registry.
Thanks, Chris, do they just get added to the bottom, or do they need to be
contained in some kind of $variable="" declaration?
Nope, it looks
Jason Marshall wrote:
When a new rules_du_jour is released, it downloads it, and i have to
manually add the "Personal Rule" snippets to the script again.
Is there a way to put those in the /etc/rulesdujour/config file so
that they don't need to be re-added all the time?
Y
script.
When a new rules_du_jour is released, it downloads it, and i have to
manually add the "Personal Rule" snippets to the script again.
Is there a way to put those in the /etc/rulesdujour/config file so that
they don't need to be re-added all the time?
Also, is the /etc/ru
Hi Peter,
Peter Kiem wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed there is a buildup of old rules in my
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour directory like this
109543 May 10 19:07 bogus-virus-warnings.cf
92609 Aug 10 2004 bogus-virus-warnings.cf.20040819-0402
93896 Aug 19 2004 bogus-virus-warnings.cf.200
Hi,
I've noticed there is a buildup of old rules in my
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour directory like this
109543 May 10 19:07 bogus-virus-warnings.cf
92609 Aug 10 2004 bogus-virus-warnings.cf.20040819-0402
93896 Aug 19 2004 bogus-virus-warnings.cf.20040823-0423
94241 Aug 23 2004
On Monday, April 4, 2005, 8:25:38 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Chris Santerre wrote:
>>I shall remove Bigevil info from the site tomorrow.
> Actually, if you wouldn't mind, Take the info down and replace it with a
> notice that the ruleset is dead and point them to using SURBL instead.
A good sugges
Chris Santerre wrote:
>I'm not involved in RDJ or bigevil, and I'm only very
>> slightly involved in
>> SARE, so I can't comment here.
>
>
>
>Slightly? You seem to forget how good your KungFu is ;)
>
No, I remember how good my KungFu is.. I just know I rarely have time to
use it for the be
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:40 AM
> To: Jim Knuth; Pete Geenhuizen
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
>
>
> At 02:13 PM 4/3/2005, Ji
At 02:13 PM 4/3/2005, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
Sorry, I don`t know. What say Matt Kettler? ;)
Hmmm, someone mentioned my name and has summoned me to this thread... hmmm..
1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page is
On Sunday, April 3, 2005, 10:34:12 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
> 2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use
> ws.surbl.org?
Yes, please use ws.surbl.org instead:
http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page isn't very clear and still
has info on how to use it with RDJ?
2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use
ws.surbl.org?
Hallo und guten Abend Pete,
danke für die Email vom 03.04.2005 um 19:34
Pete Geenhuizen schrieb - wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
Sorry, I don`t know. What say Matt Kettler? ;)
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page isn't very clear and still
has info on how to use it with RDJ?
2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use
ws.surbl.org?
Pete
--
"Unencumber
Hallo und guten Tag Pete,
danke für die Email vom 03.04.2005 um 18:52
Pete Geenhuizen schrieb - wrote:
> I've been getting the following error for a couple of days.
> The following rules had errors:
> Big Evil not found (404) at
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf
> Big Evil was not
I've been getting the following error for a couple of days.
The following rules had errors:
Big Evil not found (404) at http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf
Big Evil was not retrieved because of: 00:16:15 ERROR 404: Not Found. from
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf.
I checke
101 - 200 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
