My only addition to the comments by the esteemed gentleman from Virginia is to
make sure you have a solid practice in place to manage cluster ID when you go
VLAN, as there may be cases when your network people “cross the streams”
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:
al Message-
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Imri
Zvik
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 12:18 PM
To: Jim Senicka
Cc: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] LLT heartbeat redundancy
On Sunday 03 May 2009 19
a low pri connection
on a third network.
-Original Message-
From: Imri Zvik [mailto:im...@inter.net.il]
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 11:57 AM
To: Jim Senicka
Cc: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] LLT heartbeat redundancy
On Sunday 03 May 2009 18:25:08 Jim Senicka
You had 2 failures. No real way to design around that.
GAB "visible" would prevent bad things from occurring.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Imri
Zvik
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 11:20 AM
T
Running a non journeled file system in a cluster is always a bad idea,
as your recovery time is always effected by file system start up tasks.
Running UFS in logging mode was usually a pretty big performance hit.
Why not VxFS?
-Original Message-
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.aubur
What is your gabtab settings?
You seem to have two independent cluster generations.
You should have /sbin/gabconfig -c -n4 in gabtab
-Original Message-
From: Imri Zvik [mailto:im...@inter.net.il]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:16 AM
To: Jim Senicka
Cc: veritas-ha
A few questions
1. Do you have a support case open?
2. Do you reconnect the FC before the node boots?
3. Is the network available during boot time?
"GAB: port b is halting the system due to network failure" essentially
means that VXFEN is connecting between two clusters with different
generation
You cannot mix VCS versions.
You would need to shut down the 4.0 side, bring up the 5.0 side, bring up the
service group(s) then upgrade the 4.0 side
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steffen Winther
Sørensen
Sent
Simplest would be to point these resources to use a file in /tmp so it gets
cleared on server restart
-Original Message-
From: Kubota, Harald (GTS Pac Rim) [mailto:harald_kub...@ml.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 8:26 PM
To: Jim Senicka; A Darren Dunham; Veritas-ha
But would still get faulted, and cause offline up the dependency tree,
unless you muck with FaultHandling
-Original Message-
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of A Darren
Dunham
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 3:
No. It means you do not have to do that.
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: i man [mailto:imanuk2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 08:07 AM US Mountain Standard Time
To: Jim Senicka
Cc: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Jim Senicka wrote:
> Removal of the service group has zero effect on the storage. You need to
> use appropriate VxVM commands to manage the disk group. The vxprint command
> is VxVM and has nothing to do with VCS.
> Removing the service group was f
Removal of the service group has zero effect on the storage. You need to use
appropriate VxVM commands to manage the disk group. The vxprint command is VxVM
and has nothing to do with VCS.
Removing the service group was fine. Now you need to complete the VxVM work.
Sent from my Nokia E62 hand
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jim
Senicka
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 4:21 PM
To: i man; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] VCS Configuration 1
Comments below with JS>>>
Comments below with JS>>>
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of i man
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:36 PM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] VCS Configuration 1
All,
I am trying to c
The SRDF replication control agent for VCS HA/DR does not currently
support cascaded SRDF. It only supports STAR.
We are looking at adding cascaded, but no official support at this time,
and no committed date for cascade support.
Speak with your Symantec rep?
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.e
Talk with your Symantec rep?
The System Engineer can easily come in and discuss how VCS can manage
your DR Automation needs
From: veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-ha-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of rajesh
Kharya (rkharya)
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2
It depends on your application. What would your application do if you shut it
down from the command line and moved it?
VCS is 100% orthogonal to this discussion, as it is just executing the
commands.
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: upen [mailt
Ok
Looks like I was wrong here. Pluto is not dying a clean death.
I/O fencing may very well have prevented this issue
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Dmitriev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:56 AM
To: Jon E Price/SYS/NYTIMES; Jim Senicka
Cc: Joshua Fielden
rom the OS.
-Original Message-
From: Brad Boyer
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 8:57 PM
To: Jim Senicka; Jon E Price/SYS/NYTIMES; Andrey Dmitriev; Joshua
Fielden; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-ha] Question about HA and disks
Based on the original description, I would pr
took over the service
group on Server B, Server A was down and could not have been writing
-Original Message-
From: Jon E Price/SYS/NYTIMES [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 8:14 PM
To: Jim Senicka; Andrey Dmitriev; Joshua Fielden;
veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subj
When a server panics, it stops writing to anything but the dump device.
VCS did exactly as designed. 16 seconds after heartbeat failure it
started takeover. Whatever was damaged on your file system was already
damaged at that point, regardless how long it took to dump core to the
dump device. I wou
probing disk-group !?
To Jim, Scott and Gene.
Jim Senicka wrote:
> Is the disk group agent running on the systems?
>
Yes it is:
root 16295 1 0 16:16:01 ? 1:29
/opt/VRTSvcs/bin/DiskGroup/DiskGroupAgent -type DiskGroup
> Has the cluster been started since you created th
Is the disk group agent running on the systems?
Has the cluster been started since you created the service group
definition?
Are all resources enabled in the service groups?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pascal
Grostabussiat
Sent: Tuesda
I would be more concerned about future failures being handled properly.
If you were able to take out all networks from all nodes at same time,
you have a SPOF. If this was a one time maintenance upgrade to your
network gear and not a normal event, setting VCS to not respond to
network events means
If power cycle fixed it, it was still heartbeating on LLT.
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Dmitriev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 03:33 PM US Mountain Standard Time
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc:
AIL PROTECTED] wrote: -
To: "Shashi Kanth Boddula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mayank Vasa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Jim Senicka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-06-12 17:33
cc: ve
For any cluster larger than 1 node, I/O fencing is highly recommended to
protect data integrity in the event of a split brain.
2 nodes is not in any way more resistant to split brain than 3 nodes or
more.
VCS does not use any form of quorum based membership (quorum has a
number of it's own ugly i
You are attempting to build what is called a Replicated Data Cluster.
This should be documented in the UG as I recall.
You will use identical DG and volume resources, with the appropriate
replication management resource under the DG. To do this and comply with
the EULA, you need the HA/DR Edition o
Have you opened a support case?
To the best of my knowledge, VCS 4.1 does not support RHEL 5.
Support can confirm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goutham
N
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:37 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.ed
you only need one notifier, usually in the CSG.
No need for proxy anywhere else.
From: i man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:00 PM
To: Gene Henriksen
Cc: John Cronin; Jim Senicka; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re
Bigger question is what are you routinely using stop -force to
accomplish?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gene
Henriksen
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:17 AM
To: i man; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] .
Right.
But that can also be done via CLI or GUI with the cluster running.
From: i man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:48 AM
To: Jim Senicka
Cc: Gene Henriksen; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] .stale file
take a look at the BARG.
The NIC agent monitors the NIC
From: i man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:27 PM
To: Jim Senicka
Cc: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] Importance of NIC Proxy in Clusterservice
group
I
You should be monitoring the NIC in some service group on the box. A NIC
Proxy is used to prevent duplicate monitoring by other service groups
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of i man
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:13 PM
To: veritas-ha@
Hastop -force -all does not take down resources.
But why not add the resources online?
Hastop -force -all is really only used for heavy lifting, like upgrading
VCS bits. You can add the resources on the fly using CLI or GUI
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
5.0MP3 will add RHEL 5 support. Talk with your rep on release dates?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Stephens
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 11:48 AM
To: Goutham N; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] Veri
: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:20 AM
To: Jim Senicka; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] excessive delay between successive calls to
GAB
Jim Senicka wrote:
> "Excessive delay between successive calls to GAB heartbeat"
> is HAD heart beating GAB, so the network
"Excessive delay between successive calls to GAB heartbeat"
is HAD heart beating GAB, so the network should not be in the picture
(LLT heartbeat side), unless HAD was blocked trying to get a cluster
state update across all nodes and the network was acting weird.
You hit it right looking at syste
With SFRAC already installed, shouldn't you have VCS already installed?
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Shashi Kanth Boddula [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 02:12 AM US Mountain Standard Time
To: veritas-ha@mailman.
Fence won't start if even.
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Fielden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 04:30 PM US Mountain Standard Time
To: Rongsheng Fang; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:Re: [
No.
A. It must be an odd number. (otherwise no majority possible)
B. You cannot add online.
You will need to bounce the cluster (or at least the fence driver) to move to
the new array
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Rongsheng Fang [mailto:[EM
Even the freeze is not 100% necessary. If you switch the groups first, and then
shutdown, nothing happens to the running groups.
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Sigmund Brandstaetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 12
I think you are confusing creating 3 disks for VCS I/O Fencing coordinator
disks with creating file systems?
VCS has no need for any shared file systems on its own. Any requirement
mentioned in the docs to shared volumes would be for coordinator disks.
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodli
Kelly,
That is not normal. If the DB is top of the tree, and set to non
critical, it should not cause the group to offline. Even after we
introduced FaultPropagation and ManageFaults the core
Critical/Non-Critical behavior should not have changed.
Can you open a case on this?
Jim
-Original
The VCS HA/DR edition provides the Global Cluster Option and replication
management agents. Speak with your Symantec sales rep to obtain the
bits?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of osk
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 7:29 AM
To: ve
I disagree, as long as the SAP stuff is taken care of.
2 dedicated + 2 additional (even sharing a VLAN) is pretty good.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua
Fielden
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:40 AM
To: Ceri Davies
Cc: veritas-
Offline the service group. That will take storage offline as well
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: upen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 06:31 PM US Mountain Standard Time
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
We made a decision to not support VxVM mirror in a GCO environment
because it breaks our ability to use SCSI-III based fencing. While you
could make the mirror work, it is not a Symantec supported
configuration. For dual cluster configs we would require some form of
replication.
t is as follows (all we
need is students):
Oak Brook IL Jan 30 thru 1 Feb
Mountain View Feb 4-7
Herndon, VA Feb 20-22"
________
Jim Senicka
Senior Director, Technical Product Management
Server and Storage Management Group
Symantec Corporation
ww
Not really a VCS issue.
It really depends on the IP stack from the OS, or modifying the
application to bind to a specific IP.
Usually the source IP of an outbound packet will be whatever the base
address (first address configured) is on that interface.
One possible solution is to set the base addre
We will get that resolved (Eric and I).
Jim Senicka
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 01:11 PM US Mountain Standard Time
To: Eric Hennessey
Cc: veritas-ha
If you have multiple NIC's on a single Sun box plugged into a Cisco
switch environment using multiple VLAN, use of Local MAC = False may be
causing spanning tree reconverge. The switch fabric is potentially
discovering duplicate MAC addresses on different VLAN segments and
assumes a loop somewhere
were occurring while you were doing a telnet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Senicka
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 6:37 AM
To: Tihomir Cavuzic; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] connectivity delays
What
What address to you telnet to?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tihomir
Cavuzic
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:43 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] connectivity delays
Hello,
Let me introduce my little
A switch? No.
2 switches? Ok.
We would be looking for 100BaseT or Gigabit, full duplex. Not so much
from a bandwidth standpoint, just reliability. Full duplex removes
collision issues.
No problems with dedicated switches per interconnect network
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
version of VCS (4/5) even at 10% system
utilization. And Symantec going "I dunno", is not helpful.
Jim Senicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HAD is not talking to GAB.
Excessive system utilization, or a blocked /var file system or
some such issue.
__
HAD is not talking to GAB.
Excessive system utilization, or a blocked /var file system or some such
issue.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marianne
Van Den Berg
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:17 PM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.au
We do not have plans for more than 4. Since GCO connectivity is only needed for
direct cluster to cluster swap of a specific service group, we have not seen a
situation where one cluster has a replicated relationship with more than 3
other clusters. For managing DR, the VCS Management Console c
Please open a support case.
Also, this is the VCS list. VxVM and VxFS go under veritas-vx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Örs Tiszay O
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:09 PM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] v
Nothing. Unless you use volume resources in the dependency tree
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Artur Baruchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 05:46 PM US Mountain Standard Time
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Ok,
I was wrong here.
This is available at group level.
Let me do some digging
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Senicka
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:37 PM
To: Gurugunti, Mahesh; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re
Online Retry Limit sets how many times to attempt to online a resource
when initial attempt fails.
This is not a service group setting
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gurugunti, Mahesh
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:54 AM
To: ver
: upen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:10 AM
To: Jim Senicka
Cc: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] change cluster node
Thanks Jim,
I am unaware of the clustering works but I was suggested by colleagues
to make it to node2.
So, Cluster
cluster service group is a VCS thing. It will not effect your app at
all, and does not need to be running for your application to run. It is
there for the Web UI and to host the connector if GCO is configured
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
Add a second service group and set its auto start list to have node B
first
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shivalingam Vanam
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:38 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] Conve
This is pretty much an apache issue, not VCS. If you need to bounce apache to
make it happen, you would simply freeze the service group while doing so to
keep VCS from reacting, or use VCS to stop/start apache.
As for the command to clear logs, I cannot help you there.
Sent from my Nokia E62
ssuing log messages every 5 minutes on the offline nodes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Bueche
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 9:54 AM
To: Jim Senicka
Cc: Gene Henriksen; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha]
: Jim Senicka; Gene Henriksen
Cc: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] what shall "monitor" do on nodes not running a SG ?
Hi,
sorry, my explanation wasn't good. I try once again :
1. when a node runs a SG and its application, the local "monitor" ru
The monitor should return offline when the app is offline on the node
where the monitor is running.
Your monitor appears to not run when the app is not running.
Where is the monitor routine stored?
Does it utilize functions that are only available when the app storage
is present?
-Original
:26 AM
To: Kiss László - Károly
Cc: Jim Senicka; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] Fw: gab restarts had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
But it shouldn't be halting the system now, gab will still kill had.
Do you have any llt errors or more importantly
Do you have a support case open?
Other than load, I am unaware of anything in VCS 4.1 which can cause HAD to
block
From: Kiss László - Károly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:19 AM
To: Jim Senicka; Peter DrakeUnderkoffler
Cc: veritas
what OS/Version and what version of VCS?
Something is blocking HAD ability to heartbeat GAB
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kiss László -
Károly
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:38 AM
To: Peter DrakeUnderkoffler; Jim Senicka
Cc
is the system heavily loaded?
GAB restarts HAD when HAD does not communicate with GAB for 16 seconds.
This usually happens only in super overload situations
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kiss László -
Károly
Sent: Wednesday, Augus
Usually an excessively high load on the box causing LLT to not get
scheduled properly
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Evsyukov, Sergey
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 2:10 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha]
Talk with your rep.
Pricing is available per processor or per system.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rongsheng Fang
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 11:44 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] Licensing for Storage Fo
LLT is not starting right? All other data is non relevant. Fix the llt issue
so gab can start so had can start
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Damodharan K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 04:06 PM Mountain Standard Tim
Is there actually a device in /dev called /dev/qfe:2 ??
Think this should be /dev/qfe2.
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Damodharan K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:34 PM Mountain Standard Time
To: robertinoau;
GAB saying LLT not configured means LLT is not running. It is not saying LLT is
not configured correctly in llttab
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: robertinoau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:40 PM Mountain Standard
UFS, yes.
SVM, No
ZFS, no.
You would need to do custom agents for SVM and ZFS. Both will be
somewhat problematic from a cluster perspective. ZFS from the standpoint
that once you start breaking down storage into small enough chunks to
failover per application, most of the cool goes away. SVM from
Assuming you were running VCS inside the guest, then yes this is possible. So
this would be running standard vcs for Linux and not the VCS for VMware
package.
Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.
-Original Message-
From: Pavel A Tsvetkov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
VCS does not support rolling upgrades in that way. You need to check the
release notes.
I would recommend taking VCS down and leaving the apps up while you
patch if at all possible
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Hunter
Sent
You are running a high enough CPU loading that HAD is not able to
heartbeat with GAB.
HAD runs as a real time process, so when this occurs you have a really
wedged box.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Damodharan K
Sent: Thursday,
what OS?
The Linux 5.0 bundled agent reference guide has the Apache agent
documented, and I believe the other OS do as well
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of osk
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 3:01 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-h
comments below
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colb,
Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:14 PM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] Naming conventions for VCS; VCS style guide?
All,
We are about to initiate and upgrade sever
We are not planning to address that in VCS at this time. (Multiple
children).
Please have your account team contact me inside Symantec?
Also, what are you running that a 40 second shutdown is too long?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ce
; Jim Senicka; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] Proxy resource in "status unknown"
This started when I copied the resource from another service group.
As an aside, is there a reason why resources are defaulted to disabled
and critical when they are created
The actual NIC is not enabled, so the Proxy cannot probe. (at least that
is my first thought here)
-Original Message-
From: Fred Grieco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:29 AM
To: Jim Senicka; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-ha] Proxy
Are the system lists for both service groups the same?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
Grieco
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 9:08 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] Proxy resource in "status unknown"
I've s
Bryan
Unfortunately, at this time the VCS 5.x agents are pretty much not
designed to work in an SRM environment. We are looking at what it will
take to support this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan
Pepin
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007
: Lynette Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 08:04 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: Jim Senicka; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:RE: [Veritas-ha] Step-by-Step instructions for adding storage
to cluster
Thank you for your response, Jim.
Do you have the
if you add volumes you will need to add additional volume resources (if
you use volume resources) in the service group, plus whatever additional
file systems you add as additional file system resources
Growing file systems requires no changes in the cluster
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ma
No, you will need an IP per node and run a off the shelf IP load balancer out
front. This is far more standard approach than pumping all traffic through one
node and let it forward to all others in the cluster. A serious case of
marketecture versus real feature on the Sun Cluster side
[Sent f
fencing = SCSI3 reserve.
Not possible using VIO.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pavel A
Tsvetkov
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 7:04 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] SCSI-3 reservation over VIO with Veritas Volumes
onAIX ?
If you already have start/stop/monitor,
Take a look at the Application Agent in the BARG. That should cover like
98% of apps
-Original Message-
From: Fred Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:47 AM
To: 'Stanley, Jon'; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.aubur
The programming by example is the best bet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stanley,
Jon
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:06 AM
To: Fred Butler; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] Custom Agent
Have you looked at t
http://eval.symantec.com/mktginfo/products/White_Papers/High_Availabilit
y/agent_dev_by_example.pdf
Written by Tom Stephens and Eric Hennessey on my team. Fantastic stuff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
Butler
Sent: Thursday, Apri
Best places to get these answers are your sales team..
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pavel A
Tsvetkov
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:19 AM
To: Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] SRDF agent over VIO for VCS cluster for AIX
-s
We have a number of issues with reservations, and breaking reservations
and such.
So as of now, if the HCL says not supported, it is not.
Please work with your account team to find out what can be done (if
anything) to get this added
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
have you looked at the options to vrtslic?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kiss László -
Károly
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:41 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] remove a VRTS license
Hi,
Is there any possibility to re
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
