A much safer computing paradigm is coming if I looked correctly at todays
horoscope about what is written in the stars; I think these kind of ideas
will be huge and completely change the landscape about how to enable
integrity and catching criminals at the same time as well as keep databases
over t
It's part of the blog, computers tab, I see guile scheme as an art and have
a few suggestions of great improvements for it. But you have to demand
those features if you like it. And if you do not see we have some serious
issues in the world, just ignore it as much as you like. Enjoy your
sleep...
as a team ... Please copy to anyone that you think should read
this.
Copyright
July, 2023 Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Oh, the happy ending, here is the explanation of how nature works ;-)
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage
qm
>
>
>
> Stefan
>
> There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a
> sphere except for one axes angular motion (w instead of v)
>
>
> J.W.
>
> On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> > I think the following paper ill
; J.W.
>
> On 19.05.2023 21:19, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> > http://itampe.com/on-the-fundamentals-of-charge.html
> >
> > I must say that my intuition and back of the envelope analysis seem to
> > pan out very nicely when I start to investigate math more seriou
http://itampe.com/on-the-fundamentals-of-charge.html
I must say that my intuition and back of the envelope analysis seem to pan
out very nicely when I start to investigate math more seriously. It all fit
very well, actually a very satisfying result and this will make the
foundations of Mills GUTCP
On the other hand we have not started yet to optimize the speed of them.
Also consider what is happening on the hardware side.
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:18 PM H L V wrote:
> A cognitive scientist has suggested that the performance of these chatbots
> may have operational limits or trade-offs tha
a new flavor of old garbage...
>
> J.W.
> On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
>
> You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a sphere, we build
> it up as an addition of such paths.
>
> On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 8:00 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
>
>> St
of all) is missing. Also the 3 rotation solution is unphysical
> for mass...
>
> So going on with old garbage just produces a new flavor of old garbage...
>
> J.W.
> On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
>
> You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a
n solution is unphysical
> for mass...
>
> So going on with old garbage just produces a new flavor of old garbage...
>
> J.W.
> On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
>
> You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a sphere, we build
> it up as an a
gular motion (w instead of v)
>
>
> J.W.
>
> On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> > I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the
> > connection between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects
> > experiment... How come we can d
I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the connection
between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects experiment... How
come we can define a normal 2000 century model and end up with no
determinism and whatnot strangities.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14G9U_Iee4jsppn0
The point is that as you shrink it energy density will increase and I
simply assume there is a limit for how much density space can take. I alsa
suggest that this limit is consistent with lorentz transformations as it
would not make sense if this depends on which frame the observer has. This
also m
Hi
First of all, the pre-history of the linked article exists at
different dark corners of the internet and most likely I'm not the original
person behind these ideas. But I find the thought experiment logical and
feel that I'm obligated to popularize the ideas as they seem coherent in
many ways.
on.
stefan.ita...@gmail.com
Thank you for your time and effort!
You're welcome! It was a pleasure to have this conversation with you. If
you have any more questions or topics you'd like to discuss, feel free to
ask.
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 2:01 AM Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Stef
ld go up significantly.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023, 22:15
Subject: Analyze Preprint Paper
To: ulrika.ta...@gmail.com , Stefan Israelsson
Tampe
"Open sidebar
Analyze Preprint Paper
Model: GPT-4
Can you analyze a paper at
https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/wo5bnf/on_the_quantisation_of_angular_moment/
Maybe QM is modelling a deterministic system after all!
https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/wk3cud/on_the_stern_gerlach_experiment/
Not a post redit full of facts, but surely logically interesting and some
of you may enjoy it or get motivated to try bust the myth.
https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/wj6l2w/on_slit_experiments_and_bells_inequality/
You are a genius. I think by going to v eq c, r, go to the fine structure
constant just as Mills stated and I suspect that Vietas formula can be
deduced as that formula includes a recursion the looks very similar to what
you get if you consider surface tension in the tube you have in the torus
On
Isn't that defined by fundamental constants. Or do you mean that one can
spot interesting things about it? Else mills ideas applies
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 22:15 Robin wrote:
> In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Tue, 2 Aug 2022 21:27:28
> +0200:
> Hi,
>
> This looks interesting. Have
As a background you will need to understand the not surprising helical
model and that space can't allow high enough magnetic and electrical
fields.
Here is my take on it (it's not a new idea i suppose),
http://itampe.com/on-modeling-the-electron-loop-and-the-origin-of-mass.html
Now on top of that
I think that electron screening means that the nuclei also can aim better
at each other. In hot plasma you do not have this screening effect. Also an
effect to consider.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 7:46 AM H LV wrote:
> In response to hot fusion detractors of the cold fusion explanation of
> excess
o have trouble with a controller, that would
> still happen.
>
> AA
>
>
> On 3/27/2017 6:44 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
>
> >> That does not sound logical to me. They are close enough to having
> photovoltaics that it seems pointless to mess around with wat
al."
>
> That does not sound logical to me. They are close enough to having
> photovoltaics that it seems pointless to mess around with water calorimetry.
>
> AA
>
>
> On 3/27/2017 1:54 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
>
> As I understand the crucial thing to achie
As I understand the crucial thing to achieve good evidences is to close the
reactor and run it for long enough time with plain old water bath
calormetry. Previously he had to shut down the experiment after just a
short time. Closing the system can reveal new caveats and difficulties so
this step ca
Axil's post is one interpretation of QM, other could be that the QM fields
represents real fields e.g. no particles in space. This means that you can
view QM as billiard with fields in stead of balls and things get to be much
less mystic. Also Mills is starting to get real evidences of over unity
n
They will say, "Eurika he has got it!
No it's when they realize that in the electrion shell in Hydrogene the
centripetal forces due to motion and electrostatic force balance at the
electron shell - something you don't have in QM,
they should say Heureka.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Frank Z
Also, Mills have released a new edition of his theory, you can check it out
from the what's new page on BrLP's home page, this time in pdf format as
well
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 6:44 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Jones.
> As someone who still thinks there is a future for Ni/LAH/Li and that it
> has in
To me the dispute between Rossi and IH is very simple to resolve. If there
is any weaknesses
in the test one need to agree on a fair rerun of the test for a day or two.
There is abolutely no
sane argument for not doing such a test. Rossi has no arguments against
doing that. It's
peanuts compared to
Why can't the peak be at 100eV or 10eV and many order of magnitude more
intense. There is not much in the shown signal
that indicates a peak in teh extreme spectra near the seen peak in the
background. I think it looks like a 1/X^n curve that continues
way below the cutof of the instrument. The see
But the main frequency is invisible we only see the tail here what the peak
is in the invisible range of this instrument.
We simply don't know the magnitude of the radiation energy. But I agree
that it is way to early to call this a success.
It is an interesting lead and it should be repeated.
On
>>Also, does anyone recall mention of how hot the main chamber's outside
surface runs? I can not imagine any hope of operating without having an
excellent high temperature insulator between the inner chamber and the
outside >world. If no excellent insulation is used this device would be an
extrem
>From the demo,
- There is a heat sink in the bottom. So the silver vapor condense there.
- The silver is melted only once after the system runs everything is in a
closed system apart from losses in the cooling
- The area at the top is much higher than at the bottom. But the
temperature at the bott
This is just a story about technical development and I do find it to be a
credible process of such and I enjoyed the story leading to the final design
for which I agree that if the COP is high will lead to a success. Now Mills
clearly show no need to prove to the public that it works. It do sound l
Hi all,
This is a wild idea. I was following an interesting discussion at,
http://www.sciphysicsforums.com/spfbb1/index.php
search for double slit.
The idea here is that the particle wave duality comes from an interaction
with the slit via
momentum transfer. Whatever you think, it is a good dis
y be rare. The
> total mass of the system would be somewhat greater than one without the
> neutral “epo” and account for the ambiguous spin-mass parameter Mills is
> potentially suggesting.
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
> *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 18
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Good question, as I understand there is standing wave fields between the
>> shells so the volume is indeed
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The end result is that you get a 6 digit match between calculated and
>> meassured ionisation energy for Hydrogene and
#x27;m stuck with
understanding what the heck the light
reference frame is and why the correction moving between them are what they
are. I think that if Mills could explain that concept in much more detail
much of his work could
be followed.
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
/Stefan
> *From:* St
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In the model of infinitesimally thin orbitspheres with a charge
>> distribution >described by spherical harmoni
ates for ionisation
energies. My conclusion though is that GUTCP may be over tinkered with -
especially for the second p shell atoms and beond.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com>
t;
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Sun, Oct 11, 2015 4:40 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies
>
> Eric Walker said:
> "
> The orbitsphere is proposed to be an infinitesimally thi
is
is to actually find a model of the non linearities of the world and see
what you get. Until then
you may be right or you may be wrong.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gma
etimes I tend to get a feeling that
the whole thing is obfuscated.
Regards
Stefan
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Now really what you have in Mills is Re(Ylm
Regards
Stefan
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> j_l(|w|/c r)Ylm(e)exp(iwt), with e the spherical part of x, and r the
>> radial part.
Regards
Stefan
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
>
> Ø
>
> Ø I think that Mills theory for two atom molecules can be used to
> explain an increase in cross-sections that I've not seen mentioned when
> discussing th
I think that Mills theory for two atom molecules can be used to explain an
increase in
cross-sections that I've not seen mentioned when discussing the recent
notes from
Louis DeChiaro.
The short story is that one of the factors that demand such high energies
in standard theory
is that any small de
So they see that a lot of the behavior in 3D is codified in a surface. That
looks like they are onto the link between Mills theory and QM because Mills
codify the information
in a surface as well. Knowing the data at the electron surface and I
speculate that you can deduce the 3D behavior at least
4 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Self interference has be shown for neutrons. The double slit deminstates
> self interference of particles.
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Have the double slit been verifie
_integral_formulation
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and
>> Mills is essentially the same so for this experiment
>> there i
ying forever to find any
> hint of energy gain using Mills theory.
>
>
>
> He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication,
> AFAIK.
>
>
>
> *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
>
>
>
> I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theor
ps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and
>> Mills is essentially the same so f
ny
> hint of energy gain using Mills theory.
>
>
>
> He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication,
> AFAIK.
>
>
>
> *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
>
>
>
> I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result
hich can be replicated by others with no strings
> attached. For instance, Jeff Driscoll has been trying forever to find any
> hint of energy gain using Mills theory.
>
>
>
> He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication,
> AFAIK.
>
>
>
>
gt; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rule
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the
>> result of the double slit ex
Hi,
I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result
of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published their
hypothesis there for you to read. Consider reading,
http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/theory/double-slit/
General remark. Quantum mechanics
n it comes to issues atm.
Regards
Stefan
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
>
>
>
> I looked at the Lugano report, trying to understand the issue with the
> implicate power meter
>
> e.g. why the power loss in the cab
I looked at the Lugano report, trying to understand the issue with the
implicate power meter
e.g. why the power loss in the cable does not follow the power measured.
So, people have tried to explain this with some strange temperature
behavior of the resistance.
But isn't it more natural to explai
gt;> SOLID spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid
>>> and is not going to stir, however, it may be possible to get motion of the
>>> liquid LiH-Al metal.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
>>&g
gt; SOLID spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid
> and is not going to stir, however, it may be possible to get motion of the
> liquid LiH-Al metal.
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
&
the web of
> SOLID spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid
> and is not going to stir, however, it may be possible to get motion of the
> liquid LiH-Al metal.
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com
Heya Vortexuses,
Any thoughts about my shallow thoughts about the parghomov/Ecat setup,
When it comes to steel making, one often has a magnetic stirrer to even out
the temperature in the mold, hence improving the quality of the final
product. This works by the magnetic varying field induces curre
nd have seen a great
> collection of hydrino compounds.
> I don't understand the situation.
> Peter
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Imagination yes, if there was no real quantities calculated. B
> sees in his experiments.
>
> From this misinterpretation of these goings on in subatomic reality, R,
> Mills has created his own world that exists only in his imagination.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com
Thank you Peter, I'll try to answer the critique in the slides for Mills
theory shortly. But, I just wanted to support the rant that you do not need
to explain new
phenomena to develop a new theory and it is advisable to drop that
principle as a lone principle. The reason is, of cause if you assume
ntially zero in the long run if space have
a memory.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yep, this is exactly the problem, you have two incomplete models th
I searched a little in the litterature about thise "hydrinos", They seams
to originate from the wave operatores, people have found them in simple
wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains
it. What is interesting is that if you assume that the proton have a spatial
di
I searched a little in the literature about these "hydrinos", They seams to
originate from the wave operator, people have found them in simple
wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains
the wave operator. What is interesting is that if you assume that the
proton have
golden stars.
Mark my words, if Einstein worked at the patent office today he would
remain there, do we want such a society.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ye
e.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Did you look at the address, goes to blacklight power!!!
>>
>
> I have no reason to doubt that the rebuttal c
hematician, which should have spotted
all this in a sec. And now all is referencing
him lol.
But sure we can agree to disagree, no hard feelings.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com>
onents
has to say, Nothing. So you are dead wrong, it's the QM folks that are mute.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It is a shame that we don't have
Just to spam for your fun, the above was quite ok and a freeze of wikipedia
at 2006, no go to the this years edition and enjoy the intelligent
society we are living in,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackLight_Power
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
stefan.
ve that this will change in the near
> future. Sometimes I ask myself how much knowledge of physics do we know as
> compared to that which we do not know nor have any concept about? If we
> understand a mere 1% of the total I am in awe of the field of study.
>
> Just my few cents wo
way he thinks.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The hydrino is a variant of the hydrogen atom. It is never claimed by
>> Mills to be a fundamental particle. Hence it needs so low energy so that
&
lly charged positron. There should be gamma rays produced to
>>> account for hydrino anti-hydrino annihilation. How does the anti-hydrino
>>> interact with the electron? What neutrino is produced when a hydrino is
>>> emitted in beta decay? There are 101 other permutat
these stable fractional quantum levels in
>> his experiments, when he followed his theory
>> that predicted that the groundstate of a hydrogen atom can be destablized
>> by using catalyst which can take away n x 27.2 eV
>> from atom through collision.
>>
>> P
e 101 other permutations and combinations of
> interactions that could be experimentally demonstrated involving the
> hydrino as a fundamental elementary particle.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
&g
Orionworks,
Yes experiments is all good, i'm more concerned why we don't get any
replication / debunks and from more independent sources. Is'n there
enough to verify the evidences? Also what if it's too difficult to create
hydrinos, and Mills theory would be better suited to explain for example
co
? What is the most fundamental states of
> reality and how does the hydrino fit into that framework?
>
> These are the things I want to know.
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It can be fun to tease
It can be fun to tease out responses, here is a rant, take it for what it
is:
All science history shows that if you can express things a magnitude of
order more elegantly and easily and less convoluted you have a better
theory, this is what Mills theory does compared to quantum mechanics. That
cle
We most be open that there are mistakes in pro cold fusion results, but
also make sure that they are put into contexts, are the mistakes of a few
outliers, or are they the main part.
That is the question we need to answer. Typically to validate or disprove
cold fusion you make sure to draw a repres
the run.
>
>
>
> If there is a lot of excess heat, then Rossi may have submitted a starting
> fuel sample which was faked. Which means that his secret sauce actually
> includes 6Li.
>
>
>
> He would have done this to confuse the situation so that his secret was
> seen
why on earth did they stopped using that method as Jones seam to indicate
with his
correspondence. I don't get it.
Im staring at p 45, fig 4b / ash and is comparing with p 44, fig 3b, So is
it that much difference?
I don't understand that we can argue about data, we really shouled have
pictures from at least 20 randomly selected particles to say anything, it
is suggested that Rossi have bought the isotope 62 as
> IThe is no way in nuclear science to convert the reactants seen in the
way seen. T
This is probably true, there might be a dog buried, we need to look in that
direction. But also, it is our current view of nuclear science, all
reaction chains depends heavily on some extra constraints that you i
I wanted to add that in the dummy run there was a 10% deviation between
measured and output, assume that the
heat is proportional to the Temperature (which it's not, its T^4) you will
get a 10% error in temperature measurement.
(3.5% if you think in T^4). Now state that at the higher temperatures t
st corrosion/eating away of basically all
>>> metals as they are all slightly soluble in lithium, made worse by elevated
>>> temperatures. This reactor is a lithium heat pipe, with hot nickel powder
>>> heat source at the bottom of the tube and lithium washing down the walls
gnetic fields won't move powder
>>>> magnetically, only ions, but temps are too low for significant Li or H ions
>>>> to exist, and no ionising radiation sources in evidence.
>>>>
>>>> On 13 October 2014 00:49, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
>>&
6:55 PM, Robert Lynn wrote:
> far above curie limit for Ni, magnetic fields won't move powder
> magnetically, only ions, but temps are too low for significant Li or H ions
> to exist, and no ionising radiation sources in evidence.
>
> On 13 October 2014 00:49, Stefan Israelsson T
fit).
>
> On 13 October 2014 00:35, Stefan Israelsson Tampe > wrote:
>
>> How do we know that iti s resistive heating that is taking place? Bob
>> Greenyer at MFMP sugested that it is an inductive heater this means that
>> the wires
>> get a bit cooler then the
How do we know that iti s resistive heating that is taking place? Bob
Greenyer at MFMP sugested that it is an inductive heater this means that
the wires
get a bit cooler then the heated core.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Robert Lynn wrote:
> Fig 12b. page 26. Only just notice that they say
During the discussion about the first TIP, at energikatalysatorn there was
a huge stir about the applicability of using a heat camera to validate the
output energy until
a heat camera expert enter the discussion and although he was skeptical of
the final result, said and explained thoroughly that
:
> They compromised the integrity of the report because they were afraid to
> handle a lab saw?
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure but It takes a practical man to do it and whatever Ross
I'm not sure but It takes a practical man to do it and whatever Ross is,
he is surly is one hell of a man to work with tools so I guess it was
just an easy thing to do and the testers thought that they could monitor it
quite enough still to avoid cheating.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Blaze S
Yes and the thickness of the alumina and the "time constants" of heat
transfer dTouter/dt = K(Tinner - Touter) or similare suitable equation.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> Not scientific -- but a search of google images for "alumina transmission"
> indicates that you c
Again how serious this is depends on the temperature difference between the
inner and outer shell no. If that was serious you would expect
the top edge of a picture of the hot cat to have unsharp color shade
because the top edge should represent the heat of the outer shell. I have
not find such an
If there is a real transparancy issue as GoatGuy suggest then the inner
must be of much higher temperature then the surface.
To get a feeling of this issue I tried to look at the published picture of
the cat and see if there was a region of lower temperature
at the upper part of the ecat in the hea
Jed was talking in watts, W ~ T^4, T is the fourth root of W so it is
logarithmic
not exponential in your jargon.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Jed
>
>
>
> The calibration was done at 486 W and and then the cell was run at 790 W
> for two days. That seems reason
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
