r6rs-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Per Bothner
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andy Wingo
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Lynn Winebarger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Anton van Straaten
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Vincent Manis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Vincent Manis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Vincent Manis
• [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme Vincent Manis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme Jed Davis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] IEEE Scheme Arthur A. Gleckler
• [r6rs-discuss] SRFI spreadsheet updated John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 2: I/O John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 2: I/O John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 2: I/O Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 2: I/O John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 2: I/O John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 2: I/O Michael Lenaghan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 2: I/O John Cowan
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Grant Rettke
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground David Rush
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground David Rush
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] Is Scheme lexically scoped? [was Re: Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground] David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Is Scheme lexically scoped? [was Re: Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground] John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Grant Rettke
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Joe Marshall
  • [r6rs-discuss] First-class environments Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Joe Marshall
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Joe Marshall
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andy Wingo
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andrew Reilly
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Per Bothner
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Lynn Winebarger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andrew Reilly
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Per Bothner
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] R7RS: What is in it for the implementers? (was Which Schemes?) Grant Rettke
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] R7RS: What is in it for the implementers? (was Which Schemes?) John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] R7RS: What is in it for the implementers? (was Which Schemes?) Grant Rettke
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] R7RS: What is in it for the implementers? (was Which Schemes?) John Cowan
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Thoughts on Scheme's Future Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Thoughts on Scheme's Future Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Thoughts on Scheme's Future Pied
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] Pied
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] Lynn Winebarger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] Lynn Winebarger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future] Aaron W. Hsu
  • [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme Pied
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implicit parallel Scheme (was Re: Parallel-Scheme [was: Thoughts on Scheme's Future]) Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Thoughts on Scheme's Future Vitaly Magerya
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Thoughts on Scheme's Future Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Thoughts on Scheme's Future John Cowan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages