r6rs-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing Joe Marshall
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing Andre van Tonder
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode John Cowan
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Harvey
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Marc Feeley
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Marc Feeley
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Lynn Winebarger
  • [r6rs-discuss] identifiers vs. symbols Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] identifiers vs. symbols Lynn Winebarger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] identifiers vs. symbols Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] identifiers vs. symbols Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] identifiers vs. symbols Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Sam TH
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Per Bothner
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Per Bothner
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity Brian Harvey
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why large Scheme at all? Brian Harvey
  • [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4A: record printing John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4A: record printing Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4A: record printing John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4A: record printing Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4A: record printing Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4A: record printing John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why large Scheme at all? John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why large Scheme at all? Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 4B: case-sensitivity John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] What is R7RS for? Vincent Manis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is R7RS for? Vincent Manis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is R7RS for? Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is R7RS for? Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is R7RS for? Vincent Manis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is R7RS for? John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is R7RS for? John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Pied
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Lynn Winebarger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Alaric Snell-Pym
  • [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables Andre van Tonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Joe Marshall
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene [and 1 more messages] Joe Marshall
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene David Van Horn
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Thomas Lord
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Jed Davis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Joe Marshall
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Joe Marshall
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Re-hashing hygiene Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables Vincent Manis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Hash tables John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Alaric Snell-Pym
  • [r6rs-discuss] Why large Scheme at all? Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why large Scheme at all? Grant Rettke
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why large Scheme at all? Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Peter Bex
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Aim of the standards John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Vincent Manis
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode John Cowan
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Sam TH
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Aaron W. Hsu
• [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 3: Unicode John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] Possible non-features for small Scheme John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Possible non-features for small Scheme Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Possible non-features for small Scheme Pavel Dudrenov
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Possible non-features for small Scheme David Rush
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Possible non-features for small Scheme David Van Horn
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Harvey
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Anton van Straaten
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground John Cowan
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Andre van Tonder
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Per Bothner
  • Re: [r6rs-discuss] Proposed features for small Scheme, part 1: a stake in the ground Abdulaziz Ghuloum

• Earlier messages
• Later messages