Re: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-10 Thread Darren Ward
For a start it appears you do not have a common subnet on the link between the two devices so it'll complain about that. Make the Router A interface 10.1.1.1/255.255.255.252 and Router B 10.1.1.2/255.255.255.252 then add router ospf 1 network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0 Every OSPF network must

OSPF Problem, resolved [7:48474]

2002-07-10 Thread John Brandis
Hi All, thanks for the replies. Yes my config was all over the shop. Replaced it in both routers with the following (completely changed some things) Router B interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.2.20 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.20

RE: Salary structure for CCNPs In Japan?? [7:48472]

2002-07-10 Thread Kris Keen
5dorrah! Sorry that isnt funny. Mate, the market is shot everywhere I believe! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48475t=48472 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

RE: Salary structure for CCNPs In Japan?? [7:48472]

2002-07-10 Thread supernet
I see Cisco Japan is hiring. But if you don't speak Japanese, forget it. Yoshi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of IT Guy Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Salary structure for CCNPs In Japan?? [7:48472]

bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

2002-07-10 Thread Deepak Achar
hi i have this doubt.What is the significance of Bandwidth command in the serial interface.coz' whatever the bandwidth configured on the serial interface will not be the actual bandwidth which the serial interface is carrying. pls can any one clarify my doubt? regards deepak Message Posted

Unable to access MS Outlook using IPSec Lan-to-Lan [7:48482]

2002-07-10 Thread George Kallingal
We have an IPSec LAN-to-LAN connection between two Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrators and for some strange reason, MS Outlook is unable to connect to the Exchange server on the other side of the tunnel. All other traffic seems to travel fine, and we know for a fact that the mailboxes are accessible

Re: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

2002-07-10 Thread Ian Henderson
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Deepak Achar wrote: i have this doubt.What is the significance of Bandwidth command in the serial interface.coz' whatever the bandwidth configured on the serial interface will not be the actual bandwidth which the serial interface is carrying. pls can any one clarify my

RE: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

2002-07-10 Thread Richard Botham
Deepak, The bandwidth statement only serves to inform the routing protocol (depending on the protocol of course!) as to the real bandwidth of the interface - ie - what is the clock-rate - how many bits per second can the interface shift! This way the routing protocol knows which is the better

RE: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

2002-07-10 Thread Tim O'Brien
The bandwidth command is for proper function of routing protocols. The routing protocol will take the value of the bandwidth statement and use it in its metric. Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:11 AM

Re: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

2002-07-10 Thread Craig Columbus
It's there as a metric for routing calculations, not as a real measure of link load or capability. At 09:11 AM 7/10/2002 +, you wrote: hi i have this doubt.What is the significance of Bandwidth command in the serial interface.coz' whatever the bandwidth configured on the serial interface

Re: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

2002-07-10 Thread YASSER ALY
Bandwidth is just a nominal value that has nothing to do with the actual bandwidth which the serial interface is carrying. You would need to modify the default bandwidth value to a different one in the following cases: 1- To have meaningful readings out of the txload, rxload. For example The

RE: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

2002-07-10 Thread Craig Columbus
No, actually it's not a real measure of link load or capability. The link load parameter is a function of the bandwidth parameter, but it's not at all related to the actual bandwidth, or load, of the link. For example, I can take a 64Kbit link (actual bandwidth) and assign a bandwidth

Re: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]

2002-07-10 Thread Kim Graham
We currently have 4006's SupII in our closets and they have no trouble handling the traffic (240 ports). If you want to go IOS you can move up to the SupIII engine on this unit. They interface with our 6513's via gig uplinks and to date we have not had any issues with the 4006's or the gig

RE: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]

2002-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gig to the desktop would be overkill. You have to make a decision on were to place your bottleneck, and adjust interface speed accordingly. We have a very similar setup with Cat 6000, Cat 4000, and Cat 3000's. We determined that 100MP to the desktop would suffice any current requirement.

RE: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-10 Thread Peter van Oene
A quick note below. At 04:36 AM 7/10/2002 +, Michael Williams wrote: Lemme take a stab at this one. I don't run OSPF where I work, but I'd like to keep my chops up to date =) In OSPF, you need to have an Area 0. If there are 2 routers only in your network, and only one area, it needs

Re: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-10 Thread Peter van Oene
Comment below, At 04:18 AM 7/10/2002 +, John Brandis wrote: I have the following error whilst playing with OSPF 12:52:40: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: mismatch area ID, from backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from 10.1.4.20, Ethernet0 I have 2 routers, Router A

Re: OSPF Problem, resolved [7:48474]

2002-07-10 Thread Peter van Oene
Hi John, Although what you have works, I have one suggestion. Redistributing routes into OSPF (ie redist connected) causes your interface addresses to enter the OSPF domain as type 5 LSA's. Type 5 LSA's flood throughout the entire OSPF domain unconstrained and cannot be controlled with the

RE: Unable to access MS Outlook using IPSec Lan-to-Lan [7:48495]

2002-07-10 Thread supernet
Change PC's MTU to 1440. You can use DrTcp to do it: http://www.wdnd.com/support/DrTCP.htm Hope that helps. Yoshi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of George Kallingal Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: Unable to access MS Outlook using IPSec Lan-to-Lan [7:48496]

2002-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can you ping the mail server by name? I experienced the same problem turns out, the remote pc was authenticating to a different domain than the mail server was on (no broadcast traffic between domains) after adding the mail server to the host file on the PC, it worked fine. I'm still

sh Environment temp: Device 1 2 ? [7:48497]

2002-07-10 Thread Jeffrey Reed
On a CAT6509, when I show temp through the CLI, I see temps listed for Device 1 and Device 2 for each module in the system. Many times the temps are different for device 1 and 2 on the same module. Any idea what is device 1 and 2 on 6500 blades? Thanks!! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc.

Re: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]

2002-07-10 Thread MADMAN
If you go with the 4000 the supIII is going to give you much more performance, forwarding 48Mpps as opposed to 18 with the supI and II and if you ever decide you want layer 3 it's ready. I definately wouldn't invest in gig interfaces on a 5500. Dave Michael Williams wrote: We are going

Watchdog timeout [7:48501]

2002-07-10 Thread Muhammad Usman
Hi, Having a Watchdog timout on my 3660 with 2 nm-8a/s *** Watch Dog Timeout *** PC = 0x60183fc8, SP = 0x610de948 Well the system is continuously rebooting. Did any body experience this problem. Regards, Muhammad Usman Network Engineer al Alamiah Electronics Co. Network

All ones subnet [7:48503]

2002-07-10 Thread Meng Lee
Hello ppl, I seem to have a problem grasping what happens when we use an all ones subnet. I remember a while ago someone posted a link to CCO concerning this. The link is as below http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/40.html My questions are: 1. In case 1, when host 195.1.1.24 sends a local

Re: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]

2002-07-10 Thread Ken Diliberto
We invested in GigE interfaces for one of our 5500's. Good investment at that. It's needed for migrating to a 6500... ;-) MADMAN 07/10/02 07:25AM If you go with the 4000 the supIII is going to give you much more performance, forwarding 48Mpps as opposed to 18 with the supI and II and if

ipx question [7:48505]

2002-07-10 Thread GEORGE
How do you find the ipx address of a novell 4.11? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48505t=48505 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

Re: Watchdog timeout [7:48501]

2002-07-10 Thread MADMAN
see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/122/crashes_watchdog_timeout.shtml Dave Muhammad Usman wrote: Hi, Having a Watchdog timout on my 3660 with 2 nm-8a/s *** Watch Dog Timeout *** PC = 0x60183fc8, SP = 0x610de948 Well the system is continuously rebooting. Did

question to CCIEs [7:48507]

2002-07-10 Thread supernet
Will you consider job like this? Or is the market really this bad? http://jobsearch.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=14856363 AVSDM=2002%2D05%2D16+15%3A55%3A00%2E000CCD=my%2Emonster%2EcomJSD=jobs earch%2Emonster%2EcomHD=company%2Emonster%2EcomAD=http%3A%2F%2Fjobsear

Study Group in MI [7:48500]

2002-07-10 Thread John Golovich
I am looking to start one or am looking for a current CCIE study group in Southeastern Michigan. If anyone knows of one or is interested in participating, please send me an email and we can all get together. __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC

RE: Passive FTP [7:48357]

2002-07-10 Thread Daniel Cotts
Good explanation! Here's another reference that might be useful: pad pad http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/ftp_port_attacks.html So, I wrote a white paper on FTP (finally, I've been meaning to do this for a while.) It is available from this page:

RE: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]

2002-07-10 Thread Michael Williams
Well, part of it is Layer 10 (politics). Although I have yet to hear/read about a end device (Server/PC/printer) that can actually handle a full 1Gbps, part of the way this radiology system works is that images are transferred from a centralized storage facility to a local server, then the

RE: question to CCIEs [7:48507]

2002-07-10 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1
Well, did you contact the hiring manager? I'd guess that the base salary is 51-75K but the description says high commissions so depending on the company and it's presence/consistent sales history, that may be a good opportunity - if you like sales. -Original Message- From: supernet

Re: interface traffic showing unreasonable statistics [7:48397]

2002-07-10 Thread uday
Here are some further inputs from my side. This is a pt -to -pt Leased Line. The CSU/modem is configured for 256kbps. it shows on the router also as clockrate 256000 as per below output. #sh controllers ser2/6 M8T-V.35: show controller: PAS unit 6, subunit 6, f/w version 3-0, rev ID

RE: question to CCIEs [7:48507]

2002-07-10 Thread Brunner Joseph
51K to 75K in Marietta Georgia is like $150K in NYC. I make more than 75K (with no CCIE), and I probably live worse than someone living in GA making 40K (no car, tiny apartment, etc). 51K is my rent... (close). So, until that ad says NYC, SF, SJ CA, Relax ! Message Posted at:

RE: Passive FTP [7:48357]

2002-07-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Boy those hackers are clever! ;-) I never would have thought of that, but of course it's really pretty obvious. Because of the way the PORT command works, you can cause your FTP server to port scan a target! And that's not all you can do. Thanks for the link and all your other advice. Regarding

RE: Unable to access MS Outlook using IPSec Lan-to [7:48495]

2002-07-10 Thread richard dumoulin
Supernet might be right. It is a common problem of all sort of VPN's. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48513t=48495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

Re: Certificationzone [7:48390]

2002-07-10 Thread richard dumoulin
Thanks for all your replies. I'm a suscribed member, I missed two weekly e-mails and was starting to get afraid as I love Certificationzone. The fact is that finally yersteday I received the mail. So I am reassured. ZONE's first Distance Learning Bootcamp ?That interests me. I have also read

RE: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]

2002-07-10 Thread Jeffrey Reed
Assuming the computers are Intel Microsoft based, there's little chance, IMHO, that you'll even over-subscribe 100M links for each device. Going Gig should be no problem. If you go with the 4006, check out this link, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/lnty/etty/ggetty/prodlit/1092_pp.

Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Lupi, Guy
Let me preface this by saying that I am trying to learn more about large scale BGP design and operation. This question is on route reflectors when you have multiple POPs in seperate IGP domains. If you currently have one POP and are going to move to 2 within the same AS, you can either run full

mc3810? [7:48519]

2002-07-10 Thread GEORGE
Does the mc3810 support voice over ip as well as voice atm ,or just the mc3810 v3. What would be better to be to practice more this model or a 2600 series? The mc3810 on a standalone what parts are required? If I wanted only to to regular analog phones FXS interface? I a bit confiused as to the

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Peter van Oene
Couple thoughts. First off, one can confederate and reflect at the same time (ie rr clusters inside sub-as's). Also, keep in mind that these techniques deal with control, not forwarding and thus it is possible, and somewhat common, to have a RR hierarchy that does not map directly to the

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:42:25PM +, Lupi, Guy wrote: Let me preface this by saying that I am trying to learn more about large scale BGP design and operation. This question is on route reflectors when you have multiple POPs in seperate IGP domains. If you currently have one POP and

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Let me preface this by saying that I am trying to learn more about large scale BGP design and operation. This question is on route reflectors when you have multiple POPs in seperate IGP domains. If you currently have one POP and are going to move to 2 within the same AS, you can either run full

RE: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 5:50 AM + 7/10/02, Charles D Hammonds wrote: It is always best practice to use area 0 if it is the only area. If you have more than one area configured either one of them *must* be area 0 or there must be a virtual link to area 0. See the following for your particular error:

RE: Opinions on 4000 -vs- 6500 [7:48467]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 12:02 PM + 7/10/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gig to the desktop would be overkill. You have to make a decision on were to place your bottleneck, and adjust interface speed accordingly. We have a very similar setup with Cat 6000, Cat 4000, and Cat 3000's. We determined that 100MP to the

Re: Unable to access MS Outlook using IPSec Lan-to-Lan [7:48525]

2002-07-10 Thread Rod Rodericks
I'm still trying to figure out if there's a way to allow multiple domains in the VPN config domain? - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:16 PM Subject: RE: Unable to access MS Outlook using IPSec Lan-to-Lan [7:48496] can you ping the mail server by

router interface on a 6509 [7:48518]

2002-07-10 Thread Lopez, Robert
Group, What would cause a vlan interface to be in an up down state when doing a sh int vlanxxx command? TIA, Robert Robert M. Lopez Network Engineering Corporate Information Technology Pfizer Global Research Development Ann Arbor, Michigan Phone 734-622-3948 Fax 734-622-1690

DSL on Cisco 802 router [7:48526]

2002-07-10 Thread Simer Mayo
Does Cisco 802 router supports DSL (ATM) connections? Does anyone have a config of the working router for reference Thanks SM Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48526t=48526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription

Re: RSVP [7:48456]

2002-07-10 Thread Luciano Borges Moraes
Hi There. I got your answer and I have more questions. 1-If instead of real-time apliccations traffic I had other IP traffic, could I use the value 125ms for TC (1/8s)? 2-Is there any formula for RSVP calculation in case (question) 1 or can I decide the value just guessing? 3-Based on CCO

Re: router interface on a 6509 [7:48518]

2002-07-10 Thread dre
Lopez, Robert wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What would cause a vlan interface to be in an up down state when doing a sh int vlanxxx command? Blackhole routing. When you have a Layer 3 VLAN interface, and there are no hosts in that VLAN, then the router shuts

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 7:17 PM + 7/10/02, Phillip Heller wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:42:25PM +, Lupi, Guy wrote: Let me preface this by saying that I am trying to learn more about large scale BGP design and operation. This question is on route reflectors when you have multiple POPs in

DLSW UDP 0 issue [7:48516]

2002-07-10 Thread Mohsin Hussain
I have main DLSW router connecting to 20+ peers. 10 Of those peers connect via firewall. Since DLSW uses UDP unicast port 0 to establish circuit, firewall drops the dlsw session. To fix this Cisco came up with solution to disable the UDP using DLSW udp-disable. My question is could I configure

RE: router interface on a 6509 [7:48518]

2002-07-10 Thread Walker, Jim
What it sounds like is that you have the vlan setup on the Cat but you have no one connected to that vlan. Can you confirm? Jim -Original Message- From: Lopez, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: router interface on a

Advice on GBIC 1000BaseZX [7:48531]

2002-07-10 Thread Paulo Cesar Buerger
Hi, Cisco says that the 1000BaseZX GBIC operating over SMF links spans up to 70 km in length. And they say that link spans of up to 100 km are possible using Premium SMF or dispersion-shifted SMF (Single mode fiber). Does anybody know if this is true for Non-zero dispersion SMF ? Is

RE: question to CCIEs [7:48507]

2002-07-10 Thread Puckette, Larry (TIFPC)
I'm not CCIE but couldn't resist adding Austin to that list of high cost of living cities. :) Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512/434-1838 Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin

Boot Mode Question [7:48532]

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Godfrey
Can someone help me to change the configure-register to boot the router into router(boot) mode. I am trying to upgrade the IOS and in comes with a program that will not allow the flash to be deleted so the only way to access the flash and remove it is to boot into boot mode thus disabling the

RE: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Lupi, Guy
When you say that OSPF scales very well in a heirarchy, I realize that there are a lot of factors involved. Let's assume that all routers in each POP with the exception of aggregation and core are in NSSA areas to control LSA's but still be allowed to insert external routes, but obviously the

Re: Boot Mode Question [7:48532]

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Godfrey
This is the software that is protecting the flash from being erased manually: Flash load helper v1.0. Mark Godfrey wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can someone help me to change the configure-register to boot the router into router(boot) mode. I am trying to

RE: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Lupi, Guy
Please also keep in mind that my generalizations of the solutions in the book may leave something to be desired, and the solutions that I pointed out were certainly not the only ones presented. *-Original Message- *From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Sent: Wednesday,

Re: Cut-through vs Store Forward [7:48316]

2002-07-10 Thread sam sneed
My guess is that your sniffer sees them as 60 bytes, since most sniffers leave don;t count the CRC which is 4 bytes. Most of these are ARP packets. Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello again, Priscilla, you have said that an ethernet

Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]

2002-07-10 Thread Dain Deutschman
Hey everyone, Thanks for all of your help. I have decided that 16 must be correct since it makes perfect sense and most of you back that up as well. I think the test question was just plain wrong. Anyway...I passed the CCNP Routing exam today so I'm pretty happy. : ) Groupstudy is a great

Re: mc3810? [7:48519]

2002-07-10 Thread James Willard
The MC3810's all support VoIP, but you have to give the non-V3's a ROM/Flash/RAM upgrade since the VoIP images require 64MB of RAM. Of course, that requires upgrading the ROM too, because the existing ROM only recognizes up to 32MB of RAM. You'll just need a DSP module, Analog Voice Module, and

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:48:30PM -0400, Lupi, Guy wrote: When you say that OSPF scales very well in a heirarchy, I realize that there are a lot of factors involved. Let's assume that all routers in each POP with the exception of aggregation and core are in NSSA areas to control LSA's

Re: question to CCIEs [7:48507]

2002-07-10 Thread Jeff Harris
Is it that bad compared to Dallas? Reason I ask is I'm originally from D/FW and might have to move to Austin in a year or two. -- Jeff Harris - Cisco/Unix Engineer CCNP - Cisco Certified Network Professional On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:29:53PM +, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: I'm not

Re: Unable to access MS Outlook using IPSec Lan-to-Lan [7:48540]

2002-07-10 Thread Maximus
I thought I was the only one not able to traverse multiple domains through the VPN. This is interms of client/server applications. =) - Original Message - From: Rod Rodericks To: Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:47 PM Subject: Re: Unable to access MS Outlook using IPSec Lan-to-Lan

RE: Boot Mode Question [7:48532]

2002-07-10 Thread Leo Song
Change to 0x2101 then the flash would be read-write, I don't think enter boot mode would let you erase flash, just give it a try. Leo Best Regards. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Godfrey Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:50 PM To:

High-speed interfaces on 3600 [7:48543]

2002-07-10 Thread David j
Hello boys! I've read here http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/atmnm_ov.htm that you can have only 2 high-speed modules (FE,HSSI and ATM) in a 3640. Anybody knows why? is this information updated? I have a couple of 3620 with 2FE and one ATM modules and I'm wondering if they

RES: Boot Mode Question [7:48532]

2002-07-10 Thread Paulo Cesar Buerger
Mark, Normally I use 0x2101 and works fine for me. I can even run IOS upgrade remotely, setting an ip default-gateway. Paulo -Mensagem original- De: Mark Godfrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 10 de julho de 2002 17:50 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Boot Mode

RE: Boot Mode Question [7:48532]

2002-07-10 Thread Dan Penn
Conf t Router(config)#config-register 0x2101 Then reload, it should load into boot-mode. After you done change the config-register back to 0x2102 Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Godfrey Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:50 PM

Re: DLSW UDP 0 issue [7:48516]

2002-07-10 Thread MADMAN
I have run into the udp problem but in a differant scenerio. If you can get the 10 sites to work without adding the udp-disable to the main router I would do so otherwise being a global command you will have to touch them all. Dave Mohsin Hussain wrote: I have main DLSW router connecting

Re: router interface on a 6509 [7:48518]

2002-07-10 Thread MADMAN
That would give you a down down situation. Like a previous poster mentioned, I have seen this but it escapes me what the issue was:( Dave Walker, Jim wrote: What it sounds like is that you have the vlan setup on the Cat but you have no one connected to that vlan. Can you confirm?

Re: High-speed interfaces on 3600 [7:48543]

2002-07-10 Thread MADMAN
The 2 FE's in your 3620 are not modules, the are built into the chassis. Dave David j wrote: Hello boys! I've read here http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/atmnm_ov.htm that you can have only 2 high-speed modules (FE,HSSI and ATM) in a 3640. Anybody knows why? is

RE: Next Step [7:48450]

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Odette II
Jaspreet- It's just my .0010 cents, but I think your thoughts are right on target. I personally think that the CCDA would be the next step for foundational purposes of making a well-rounded CCIE candidate... but as others will comment, you don't need it to pursue the CCIE LAB. After the

RE: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Lupi, Guy
I know that you can run confederations and reflectors, and seperate levels of reflection, which Cisco refers to as nested reflection. Now my question is, how would you set up your bgp peering? Due to financial constraints I would imagine that the best thing to do would be to have one circuit

Re: High-speed interfaces on 3600 [7:48543]

2002-07-10 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
MADMAN wrote: The 2 FE's in your 3620 are not modules, the are built into the chassis. Not on a 3620 they aren't. That's the 2620 you're think of, most likely. Which makes me wonder: how did het get a 3620 to hold 2 FE interfaces and an ATM interface? There is no room for them, unless Cisco

calculating subnets? [7:48552]

2002-07-10 Thread GEORGE
Does anyone have some cool or useful links to calculate subnetting including broadcast . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48552t=48552 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 8:56 PM + 7/10/02, Lupi, Guy wrote: When you say that OSPF scales very well in a heirarchy, I realize that there are a lot of factors involved. Let's assume that all routers in each POP with the exception of aggregation and core are in NSSA areas to control LSA's but still be allowed to

RE: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 10:27 PM + 7/10/02, Lupi, Guy wrote: I know that you can run confederations and reflectors, and seperate levels of reflection, which Cisco refers to as nested reflection. Now my question is, how would you set up your bgp peering? Due to financial constraints I would imagine that the best

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 9:18 PM + 7/10/02, Phillip Heller wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:48:30PM -0400, Lupi, Guy wrote: When you say that OSPF scales very well in a heirarchy, I realize that there are a lot of factors involved. Let's assume that all routers in each POP with the exception of

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:27:08PM +, Lupi, Guy wrote: I know that you can run confederations and reflectors, and seperate levels of reflection, which Cisco refers to as nested reflection. Now my question is, how would you set up your bgp peering? Due to financial constraints I

Re: calculating subnets? [7:48552]

2002-07-10 Thread Michael L. Williams
Dain just posted this site a few days ago right up your alley. pad pad pad http://www.learntosubnet.com/ Mike W. GEORGE wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anyone have some cool or useful links to calculate subnetting including broadcast . Message

Re: High-speed interfaces on 3600 [7:48543]

2002-07-10 Thread David j
There is a 2 FE NM 2-WAN card slot network module (product number NM-2FE2W). In fact now I have a 3620 on the lab which have 1 ATM interface, 2 FE interfaces, 2 serial interfaces and 1 BRI interface (it hadn't room for anything else ;-) M.C. van den Bovenkamp wrote: MADMAN wrote: The 2

Re: Certificationzone [7:48390] (resend 2) [7:48443]

2002-07-10 Thread richard dumoulin
I am suscribed and was afraid of loosing Certificationzone coz I love it. But finally I received the weekly e-mail yersteday. Distance bootcamp ?? That interests me. Surely, this way Certificationzone obliges me to renew the suscription for 2 years at least. Anyway, thx to all ur replies.

Re: High-speed interfaces on 3600 [7:48543]

2002-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heard of the NM-2FE2SW? I haven't checked whether it is supported by the 3620, though. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 11/07/2002 09:47 am - M.C. van den Bovenkamp Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/07/2002 08:39 am Please respond to M.C. van den Bovenkamp To:

Re: question to CCIEs [7:48507]

2002-07-10 Thread chris
Its definately pretty high and the IT market is bad right now, slim pickens on the jobs. Chris Jeff Harris wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Is it that bad compared to Dallas? Reason I ask is I'm originally from D/FW and might have to move to Austin in a year or

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Nigel Taylor
All, Being one of the folks currently reading Howard's most recent book titled - Building Service Provider Networks, I must say that I'm enjoying the various points being addressed by this thread. Also, this does remind me of an article in the 2nd Qtr edition of Packet Magazine titled, ISP

RE: ipx question [7:48505]

2002-07-10 Thread Kris Keen
'config' or load up INETCFG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48564t=48505 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
All, Being one of the folks currently reading Howard's most recent book titled - Building Service Provider Networks, I must say that I'm enjoying the various points being addressed by this thread. Also, this does remind me of an article in the 2nd Qtr edition of Packet Magazine titled,

RE: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Lupi, Guy
I had a feeling that would happen, I will try to clarify. I was not trying to say that there should be a central core site for the ISP's entire network, but for pieces of it. Lets take a state like New York, within it you have 3 POPs, each is in it's own AS and runs an IGP. In each POP you

Re: Cut-through vs Store Forward [7:48316]

2002-07-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
sam sneed wrote: My guess is that your sniffer sees them as 60 bytes, since most sniffers leave don;t count the CRC which is 4 bytes. That's a good point. The NIC strips the CRC. Some analyzers do let you configure the NIC to capture the CRC. Usually this isn't necessary unless you happen

Re: High-speed interfaces on 3600 [7:48543]

2002-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, OK, I can't type! NM-2FE2W!! (If anyone has heard of a NM-2FE2SW though I'd be interested to know what it is ;-) JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 11/07/2002 11:59 am - Heard of the NM-2FE2SW? I haven't checked whether it is supported by the 3620, though. JMcL

Re: High-speed interfaces on 3600 [7:48543]

2002-07-10 Thread David j
As you can see in my previous post it's the module I'm using, supported at least since 12.1(1)T according to http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/nm-fe2w.shtml I'm afraid that NM-2FE2SW doesn't exist (I presumed that you were talking about NM-2FE2W but I did a search at cisco just in case...:-)

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:28:08AM +, Lupi, Guy wrote: I had a feeling that would happen, I will try to clarify. I was not trying to say that there should be a central core site for the ISP's entire network, but for pieces of it. Lets take a state like New York, within it you have 3

All ones subnet [7:48570]

2002-07-10 Thread Wesley
Hello Group, Posted this yesterday but mysteriously disappeared :-). Three things to confirm about broadcasts. a) the all ones broadcast i.e 255.255.255.255 by default will only be propagated to the local network and is not forwarded by routers b) network and subnet directed broadcasts. If I

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:14:07AM +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Did you mean there is no excuse for [not] having a very clean hierarchical addressing structure or I'm I missing something, as always..:- TIA Nigel You've got me. A dirty infrastructure addressing system is

Re: What is meant in the Cat5k by interface sc0 [7:48375]

2002-07-10 Thread Rick
If memory serves me correctly it stands for Serial Console 0 John Brandis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... ** visit http://www.solution6.com visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for

RE: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

2002-07-10 Thread Deepak Achar
hi all Thanks a lot for ur inputs.it cleared my doubt on the topic. regards deepak Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48573t=48481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Aironet SNMP tricks revealed [7:48574]

2002-07-10 Thread Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555
I spent about twenty hours last week dorking around with AP35x and BR35x, MRTG, and snmpwalk on a unix box. I've created some MRTG configs that will graph common 802.11b errors vs good fragments and I posted the MIBs used along with links to two MIB browsers that will produce the OIDs you need

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 2:29 AM + 7/11/02, Phillip Heller wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:14:07AM +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Did you mean there is no excuse for [not] having a very clean hierarchical addressing structure or I'm I missing something, as always..:- TIA Nigel You've

Re: High-speed interfaces on 3600 [7:48543]

2002-07-10 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
David j wrote: There is a 2 FE NM 2-WAN card slot network module (product number NM-2FE2W). In fact now I have a 3620 on the lab which have 1 ATM interface, 2 FE interfaces, 2 serial interfaces and 1 BRI interface (it hadn't room for anything else ;-) I knew this was going to turn around