shoelaces

2002-12-05 Thread The Fool
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~gasmith/knots/knots.html

The old saying goes that: All I need to know I learned in kindergarten.
Well, I certainly wish that somebody had told me about the proper way to
tie my shoes back then! There is recent experimental evidence (but don't
bother looking into any scientific journals for it) which suggests there
is in fact a right and a wrong way to tie your shoes. The difference is
subtle; the effect is not. Tie your shoes the right way and they will
rarely come undone. Tie them the wrong way, and you will be frequently
tripping over your shoelaces.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
David Hobby wrote: 
 
 This is an action that I take only with GREAT 
 reluctance.  However, neither Julia nor I is 
 willing to endure harassment of this kind. 
  
 I imagine that you have collect a lot of interesting 
 material for your study of internet communities and 
 how they deal with a crisis. 
  
 Or maybe not - probably the listmembers that would 
 support Jeroen are silent, because this is not a 
 conflict between common listmembers, 
 but between a listmember and the list Overlord. 
  
   Hey, you forgot the emoticons!  : ( 
 
No, I didn't. 
  
   I guess that I support Nick's action, anyway I 
 gave up and killfiled Jeroen for keeps weeks ago. 
 We keep kicking around ideas on easy ways to 
 collectively deal with individuals who don't  
 respect etiquette.  But until we do come up with one 
 that works, the listowner and overlord has to step in. 
 
I begin to understand why Jeroen was singled-out to 
be the victim-of-the-day. Some reasons are obvious: 
he *was* a listowner, so our meme of challenge 
authority took control. Others are subtle. 
 
And his behaviour in the past days, with mailbombing, 
lawsuits, and forged headers, make him a very 
tasty target! Who's better to be harassed as someone 
who screams and shouts? 
 
I guess by now everybody will be very pleased, 
seeing how he is reacting. I was right! He's not 
a member of a civilization! Let's ban him forever! 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
PS: I am _also_ a meme-stereotype. If everybody is 
against Jeroen, then I must stand to be the Defender 
of the Lost Cause :-) 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



rain

2002-12-05 Thread The Fool
Suppose you wanted to calculate the time it would take an even consistent
rainfall over the entire surface of the earth to raise the sea level
above the level of Mt. Everest (+5 miles or so), what would you need to
know about rainfall, volume of the earth, topography of the earth, etc.
to make a good first order approximation?

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko

Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 I begin to understand why Jeroen was singled-out to 
 be the victim-of-the-day. 

Was he?
Admittedly I have only been re-subbed here for a few months, I have not
had much time to devote to Brin-L mail but I seem to have missed the
singling-out.

 And his behaviour in the past days, with mailbombing, 
 lawsuits, and forged headers, make him a very 
 tasty target! Who's better to be harassed as someone 
 who screams and shouts? 

Who is supposed to be harassing him?

 I guess by now everybody will be very pleased, 
 seeing how he is reacting. I was right! He's not 
 a member of a civilization! Let's ban him forever! 

But isn't that assuming that the rest of us are incapable of
disapproving of the deeds without hating the doer? :)
 
 PS: I am _also_ a meme-stereotype. If everybody is 
 against Jeroen, then I must stand to be the Defender 
 of the Lost Cause :-) 

But isn't that assuming that his cause is lost? :)

Ritu
GCU A Veritable Graveyard Of Cats

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Scouted: Women prefer HDTV to Diamonds???

2002-12-05 Thread Kevin Tarr


My mother's aunt couldn't keep the house cool when my mom was living
with her (and didn't listen to my mom's advice on handling it).  She
went away for a week, and the temperatures were higher that week than
they'd been all summer, but when she got home, my mother had it cooler
in the house than it had been in a couple of months.  I think after
that, my mom was put in charge of keeping the house cool until she moved
out.  :)

Julia


As I had said, I know what to do, but sometimes knowing and doing doesn't 
get the job done. The above is a perfect example. My brother stays here 
when he's working in the area, he has all kinds of advice for keeping the 
house cool. But who doesn't close their blinds in the morning, and leaves 
the windows wide open all day (even now in the winter)? There were plenty 
of days I'd have the house doing okay, cool enough, then there'd be a slip 
up or a few extra hot days and the whole system would fail.

My niece was also staying here this summer, but she had no clue that if a 
door was closed there was a reason, blinds need to be pulled shut, how ACs 
work. (I had a broken AC in a closet downstairs, and a working one 
underneath a window. She didn't want the working AC put in at first because 
once it went in, it stayed in with a special bracket, no air movement in 
that window. It finally got too hot for her but instead of asking me to 
lift the AC into the window, she just turned it on where it sat on the 
floor; then carried the broken one upstairs and put it on top of the other 
one and wondered why she wasn't cool! This girl is in college?)(I was 
saving the broken AC for a friend taking HVAC classes, they work on old ACs 
otherwise I was throwing it out).

Kevin T.
10.25 - 20.5 cm of snow today!
I still have to go to work, as far as I know

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: rain

2002-12-05 Thread Trent Shipley
For a first order approximation you would throw away topography as 
irrelevant (after all, it starts at only 30% and gets smaller as you add 
water) and you would treat the Earth as a proper sphere using distance from 
the center of the sphere to mean sea level as diameter.

Assume a constant rainfall, not adujsted for the increasing size of the sphere 
as the ocean gets deeper.  Say, 1 inch per hour, that's a nice hard rain so 2 
feet a day.  It'll take a while to reach 5 miles. 

However, if you say wanted to know if it would fit into, say 40 days and 40 
nights, you would just assume that it rained 5 miles/40 days, that is 
1mile/8days, or 1/8 mile per day.  It would, indeed, require a miracle.

However, the miracle needed to produce such a global deluge would pale beside 
the erosive effects of so much precipitation.  Where *DID* all that topsoil 
come from?

On Thursday 05 December 2002 04:01 am, The Fool wrote:
 Suppose you wanted to calculate the time it would take an even consistent
 rainfall over the entire surface of the earth to raise the sea level
 above the level of Mt. Everest (+5 miles or so), what would you need to
 know about rainfall, volume of the earth, topography of the earth, etc.
 to make a good first order approximation?

 ___
 http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: rain

2002-12-05 Thread The Fool
 From: Trent Shipley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 For a first order approximation you would throw away topography as 
 irrelevant (after all, it starts at only 30% and gets smaller as you
add 
 water) and you would treat the Earth as a proper sphere using distance
from 
 the center of the sphere to mean sea level as diameter.
 
 Assume a constant rainfall, not adujsted for the increasing size of the
sphere 
 as the ocean gets deeper.  Say, 1 inch per hour, that's a nice hard
rain so 2 
 feet a day.  It'll take a while to reach 5 miles. 
 
 However, if you say wanted to know if it would fit into, say 40 days
and 40 
 nights, you would just assume that it rained 5 miles/40 days, that is 
 1mile/8days, or 1/8 mile per day.  It would, indeed, require a miracle.
 
 However, the miracle needed to produce such a global deluge would pale
beside 
 the erosive effects of so much precipitation.  Where *DID* all that
topsoil 
 come from?

It would also boil the ocean from the friction of traveling through the
atmosphere.  I am not a believer in miracles.

Suppose you wanted a precise scientifically exact approximation?

 On Thursday 05 December 2002 04:01 am, The Fool wrote:
  Suppose you wanted to calculate the time it would take an even
consistent
  rainfall over the entire surface of the earth to raise the sea level
  above the level of Mt. Everest (+5 miles or so), what would you need
to
  know about rainfall, volume of the earth, topography of the earth,
etc.
  to make a good first order approximation?
 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Ritu Ko wrote: 
  
 I begin to understand why Jeroen was singled-out to  
 be the victim-of-the-day.  
  
 Was he? 
 
Yes. 
 
 And his behaviour in the past days, with mailbombing,  
 lawsuits, and forged headers, make him a very  
 tasty target! Who's better to be harassed as someone  
 who screams and shouts?  
  
 Who is supposed to be harassing him? 
 
If _every_ message he wrote was replied with 
mild offenses, this is a harassing. 
 
 I guess by now everybody will be very pleased,  
 seeing how he is reacting. I was right! He's not  
 a member of a civilization! Let's ban him forever!  
  
 But isn't that assuming that the rest of us are 
 incapable of disapproving of the deeds without 
 hating the doer? :) 
 
Yes. Which makes Me the only Saint in the list :-P 
 
 PS: I am _also_ a meme-stereotype. If everybody is  
 against Jeroen, then I must stand to be the Defender  
 of the Lost Cause :-)  
  
 But isn't that assuming that his cause is lost? :) 
 
Of course it is a lost. It will escalate forever.  
Probably it will end up in splitting the list in 
two - the best scenario, the other scenarios are 
worse. 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Erik Reuter wrote: 
  
 And his behaviour in the past days, with mailbombing, 
 lawsuits, and forged headers, make him a very tasty 
 target! Who's better to be   
 harassed as someone who screams and shouts?
  
 Actually, it is the reverse. What better person to shout 
 at then one who harasses? (I wonder if you have 
 confused harass with tease? Jeroen 
 has never been harassed by anyone on Brin-L that I know of) 
 
Maybe I confused the terms. Is there any precise 
definition? IMHO, harass should mean that the subject 
of the action feels so.  
  
 I guess by now everybody will be very pleased, seeing 
 how he is reacting. I was right! He's not a member 
 of a civilization! Let's ban him forever!  

  
 No, I think that most people would be happy for the 
 ban to be temporary, if only Jeroen would apologize 
 or even show a little remorse for his 
 past misbehavior. What do you think are the chances of that? 
 
Less than 10%. Which is why I think this will escalate 
to Jeroen's final ban - another symptom that the list 
is dying. 
  
 PS: I am _also_ a meme-stereotype. If everybody is 
 against Jeroen, then I must stand to be the Defender 
 of the Lost Cause :-) 
  
 Time to ban Alberto! 
  
Try it!!! I will fight back!!! I will mailbomb all 
of you!!! 
 
Of course, threats aren't literal. When you say that 
to me, it's obvious a joke. When Jeroen said that to 
JDG [IIRC], everybody took it as serious. When Nick 
says it to Jeroen, he's serious. 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Erik Reuter
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:50:19AM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 Maybe I confused the terms. Is there any precise definition?

Probably not as precise as you want. But I think the usual use of
harass implies repeated, unwanted action or attention (in some manner)
and with intent to harm.

Tease doesn't necessarily imply any of those qualities (although it
COULD occasionally, they are not implied).


-- 
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Ritu Ko wrote: 
  
 But isn't that assuming that his cause is lost? :)  
  
 Of course it is a lost. It will escalate forever.   
 Probably it will end up in splitting the list in  
 two - the best scenario, the other scenarios are  
 worse.  
  
 It would end up *splitting* the list in two and that 
 is the *best* case scenario!?!?! 
  
Yes. People have been leaving the list with angry 
goodbye, f--- you all messages along the years. 
Maybe these two points of view are unable to 
live together happily forever. 
 
 Well, I have no idea what I have stumbled onto so I'll 
 just sit down and keep quiet. :) 
 
Worst case scenario will be things getting out of 
the Cyberspace, like Digimon 3. 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ray Ludenia
Alberto Monteiro wrote:

  Which is why I think this will escalate
 to Jeroen's final ban - another symptom that the list
 is dying. 

The symptom that the list is dying is that yet again we are involved in
endlessly discussing one particular person and his actions and other's
reactions. Enough of the self-flagellation already.

Regards, Ray.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: harassing is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-12-05 Thread Erik Reuter
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:05:45AM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 So, I think I used the right term. As soon as we noticed how Jeroen   
 reacts to things that **would** be teasing to other people - by   
 feeling harmed - the teasing became a harassing   

No, even if I allow you the intent to harm (which is debatable), it
lacks the other 2 qualities I mentioned.


-- 
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Ray Ludenia wrote: 
  
  Which is why I think this will escalate 
 to Jeroen's final ban - another symptom that the list 
 is dying.  
  
 The symptom that the list is dying is that yet again 
 we are involved in endlessly discussing one particular 
 person and his actions and other's 
 reactions. Enough of the self-flagellation already. 
  
I hate those kind of discussion. Why did I drag 
myself to become the solo defender of Jeroen? 
 
I guess I know: because it will make me the Only 
Defender of Free Speech :-P 
 
Things would be different if I were the list-tyrant. 
I would ban everybody who sent messages using the 
horrible imperial units 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ray Ludenia
Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 Things would be different if I were the list-tyrant.
 I would ban everybody who sent messages using the
 horrible imperial units

So you admit that not all imperial units are horrible? Never thought I'd see
the day!

Ray.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



wolfling language is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Ray Ludenia wrote:  
   
 Things would be different if I were the list-tyrant.  
 I would ban everybody who sent messages using the  
 horrible imperial units  
   
 So you admit that not all imperial units are horrible?  
 Never thought I'd see the day!  
   
Who made you think that? I don't know English grammar,  
but in Portuguese an adjective can be explanatory  
or restrictive. _imperial_ is restrictive, I want  
to reduce the set of units to those that are imperial.  
_horrible_ is explanatory, because every imperial  
unit is horrible. Damn the ambiguities of the wolfling  
languages :-(  
  
Probably Gal2 has such distinctions  
  
Alberto Monteiro  
  
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: So how much is the participation on a mailing list worth?

2002-12-05 Thread Julia Thompson
Dan Minette wrote:
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:36 PM
 Subject: Re: So how much is the participation on a mailing list worth?
 
  Jim Sharkey wrote:
  
   Apparently, it's worth $1,000,000.
  
   I had no idea you could sue for being banned from a free Internet
   mailing list.  You learn something new every day.
 
  Did I miss something?
 
  Julia
 
 You didn't get the email threatening you and Nick with a  $1,000,000
 lawsuit and any damage to your career that he can arrange?

Nope.  That one didn't make it here for some reason.

As I don't really have a career at this point besides being a wife and
mother, I don't know what he could do.

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Baker
Alberto said:

 Worst case scenario will be things getting out of 
 the Cyberspace, like Digimon 3. 

My worst case scenario involves giant asteroids, gamma ray bursts,
all-out nuclear exchanges, plague, famine, brain-eating zombie
infestations, leaves on the line, and Steps reforming.

Rich
GCU And The Universal Adoption Of Imperial Units

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko
Rich wrote:

 My worst case scenario involves giant asteroids, gamma ray bursts,
 all-out nuclear exchanges, plague, famine, brain-eating zombie
 infestations, leaves on the line, and Steps reforming.
 
 Rich
 GCU And The Universal Adoption Of Imperial Units

And the wombats?

Ritu
GCU You Can't Forget The Wombats!

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Toilets! Re: DIY bathroom troubles, Re: Fwd: Religion, the good side

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 08:18 PM 12/3/02 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:


Toilets are useful things that all of us come in contact with several
times a day, and when they malfunction, it's a problem.  (Notice that a
significant portion of the toilet talk is about ones that aren't working
optimally, at the very least?)

Why is that any different from anyone discussing their computer
problems?

(At least we haven't had anything resembling an OS war on the toilet
front!)




How about regular versus low-flow?

(Which is frequently NO-flow . . . providing a counterexample to Adam's 
Second Law of Plumbing, in that it just sits there and ferments rather than 
going down the pipe . . . )



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Toilets! Re: DIY bathroom troubles, Re: Fwd: Religion, the goodside

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 10:11 PM 12/3/02 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:

Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:

 Julia wrote:
 
  (At least we haven't had anything resembling an OS war on the toilet
  front!)

 That's probably because you're one of those lamers that uses the
 low-volume toilets, that you have to flush 3 times to get everything
 out of the bowl.

 Me?  I go out and find Old Skool toilets, that have at least a 5 gal
 capacity.  Not that I need it, but just in case

 Adam C. Lipscomb
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Making new strides in reaching the lowest common denominator

Ah, but have you tried a high-end Japanese-manufactured low-volume
toilet?




Neither my end nor my pocketbook are high enough to try them . .




Those work very nicely, and use less water.  Best of both
worlds.  :)

Julia

just waiting now for Ronn's inevitable comment




I've been busy:  finals getting started and all (talk about feeling like 
you're getting hit with a load of crâp . . .



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: DIY bathroom troubles, Re: Fwd: Religion, the good side

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 07:10 PM 12/3/02 -0600, Dan Minette wrote:


- Original Message -
From: Adam C. Lipscomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: DIY bathroom troubles, Re: Fwd: Religion, the good side


 I learned the 3 rules of plumbing some years ago, and I'll share them
 with you now.

 (1) Hot water goes on the left
 (2) Shit goes downhill
 (3) Payday's on Friday

 That's really all you need to know.

 Well, that, and (4) Make triple sure you've turned off the water
 before touching the pipes.

One think that I learned from my dad: make quadruple sure the high voltage
is off before you work on it. :-)

I once screamed at a nice woman because I was working on a high current
high voltage switching system, and had turned it all off nicely.  She
turned it back on behind my back while I was working.  That was before the
days of lock out




Was it on this list awhile back (at least back while we were on the Cornell 
server) that we had the discussion about always being careful to discharge 
the flyback capacitor before doing any work on a TV set or computer monitor 
(and at least one person¹ confessed to have learned that lesson the hard 
way . . . )?

_
¹Not me.  I learned how to do it when I was tasked with writing a computer 
maintenance manual many years ago, and so far have never forgotten to do so 
before sticking my finger in that little hole on the side of the CRT (or 
anywhere else inside the set for that matter) . . .



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Baker
unsubscribe jeroen-l

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Marvin Long, Jr.
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 PS: I am _also_ a meme-stereotype. If everybody is 
 against Jeroen, then I must stand to be the Defender 
 of the Lost Cause :-) 

Does that mean you don't actually disagree with Nick's decision, but are 
only protesting pro forma in your role as Official Contrarian?

Or are you protesting?  You seem to be lamenting the lack of support for 
Jeroen's case, but I don't see you arguing on his behalf in any specific 
way, except maybe for debating the concept of harrassment.

Marvin Long
Austin, Texas
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld,  Ashcroft, LLP (Formerly the USA)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Scouted: Women prefer HDTV to Diamonds???

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 09:53 AM 12/4/02 -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote:

Russell Chapman wrote:

How dirty can a ceiling get??


That depends on how often you use candles, oil lamps, oil simmerpots, 
potpourri, and other things that put extra stuff in the air.

And how often you do experiments that involve making a working volcano 
model on the living room coffee table...   :-)


It wasn't a volcano, but the results of one experiment that . . . ahem . . 
. produced excess amounts of unwanted gaseous byproducts which were 
sufficient to remove the top from the container and create a fountain of 
chemical mix which removed the paint from the areas of the ceiling it touched.

Results:

(1)  Yes, I figured out what went wrong.  (Fortunately, the eruption 
occurred after I had set the container down and stepped away from the table.)

(2)  My father got to repaint the kitchen (at about the same time, a 
boilover from another experiment had sprayed black corrosive stuff on one 
wall, so the whole thing needed repainting).

(3)  My father also got to help me put shelves, etc., in the utility room 
to use that area, rather than the kitchen, as laboratory space, with the 
additional caveat that experiments involving the use of heat were to be 
conducted out of doors on the patio.  (Concrete, however, is not the best 
surface over which to handle expensive lab glassware purchases with one's 
allowance.  And then there were days when the wind seemed to take the fumes 
directly into the neighbor's open bedroom window . . . )

(4)  Eventually I decided to become a professional astronomer rather than a 
chemist.



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SCOUTED: Will Smith to star in 'I, Robot'

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 04:35 PM 12/4/02 -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Movies/12/04/film.smith.reut/index.html
or
http://makeashorterlink.com/?E299429A2

NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Fox has booked Will Smith
to star in sci-fier I, Robot, an adaptation of
the 1940s Isaac Asimov short-story collection
that set the groundwork for robot films ranging
from The Terminator to A.I., Variety reports.

[snip]

The movie is a futuristic thriller in which a
detective investigates a crime that might have
been perpetrated by a robot, even though that
seems an impossibility given those three
prevailing rules [the three laws of robotics].

The big idea here is that if the robots have
found a way to violate the laws, there is
nothing to stop them from taking over, because
the human race is so dependent on robots and
automation, said 20th Century Fox film president
Hutch Parker.

Reggie Bautista
VFP I was hoping for a Susan Calvin movie




Perhaps Will Smith in drag?



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: meeces

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 08:58 PM 12/4/02 -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:

On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:53:53PM -0800, Nick Arnett wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
  Behalf Of The Fool

 ...

  http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/04/coolsc.coolsc.mousegenome/
 
  When it comes to DNA, it turns out there's not that much difference
  between mice and men.
  Mice and humans each have about 30,000 genes, yet only 300 are unique to
  either organism. Both even have genes for a tail, even though it's not
  switched on in humans.

 Uh, could it be?  Now *that* would be a prank!

I wouldn't mind having a *prehensile* tail. A useless drooping one
wouldn't be so useful, though.




How about a tail like that of a cat, useful for (1) balancing oneself while 
jumping or changing direction quickly and (2) nonverbal expression of 
emotional states?


Would Have To Redesign Chairs Though Maru



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: rain

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 05:01 AM 12/5/02 -0600, The Fool wrote:

Suppose you wanted to calculate the time it would take an even consistent
rainfall over the entire surface of the earth to raise the sea level
above the level of Mt. Everest (+5 miles or so), what would you need to
know about rainfall, volume of the earth, topography of the earth, etc.
to make a good first order approximation?




You need an additional 3.7 times the total volume of all the water on 
Earth, or a sphere of water about 1300 miles in diameter.  What you do with 
the excess when you have finished cleansing the Earth is left as an 
exercise for the student.



Been There Done That Maru



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko

Rich wrote:

 unsubscribe jeroen-l

Me too.

Ritu
GCU Please

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko

Rich wrote:

 unsubscribe jeroen-l

Me too.

Ritu
GCU Please

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message -
From: Ritu Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: Admin: Server access blocked



 Rich wrote:

  unsubscribe jeroen-l

 Me too.


Two comments on this:

1) Why doesn't Jerone start up his own version of BRIN-L (caps on purpose)
and see how many people would subscribe.  If it is more than
[EMAIL PROTECTED], then he has made his point.

2) You could start a good discussion with that 100k exposition on the
morality of pacifism that you've been owning me. evil grin.

Actually, I'm even looking forward to a small exposition from someone of
your viewpoint,  wisdom and intellect.

Dan M.



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko

unsubscribe jeroen-l

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Marvin Long, Jr. wrote: 
  
 PS: I am _also_ a meme-stereotype. If everybody is  
 against Jeroen, then I must stand to be the Defender  
 of the Lost Cause :-)  
  
 Does that mean you don't actually disagree with 
 Nick's decision, but are only protesting pro forma 
 in your role as Official Contrarian? 
 
You are a very evil person... 
  
 Or are you protesting?  You seem to be lamenting the 
 lack of support for Jeroen's case, but I don't see 
 you arguing on his behalf in any specific  
 way, except maybe for debating the concept of harrassment. 
 
serious 
My point is that it's not fair to ban Jeroen without 
the consent about the list rules. We didn't agree to 
what would be the list rules, and which was the minimum 
set of restraint that listmembers should show before 
being suspended 
 
And even 40 messages per day can't be considered 
mailbombing. I guess even I - who spend too much 
time watching TV - have occasionally written 40 
messages in one day. 
/serious 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: meeces

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
In talking about humans with prehensile tails, Marvin wrote:


To hell with fashion.  Porn!


Kinda brings a whole new meaning to getting some tail...

Reggie Bautista
Ducking very quickly Maru


_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: meeces

2002-12-05 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message -
From: Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: meeces


 In talking about humans with prehensile tails, Marvin wrote:

 To hell with fashion.  Porn!

 Kinda brings a whole new meaning to getting some tail...


I'm amazed at how influential Marvin is.  Rick Perry has already introduced
legislation to the Texas 'ledge outlawing anything to do with consenting
adults and tails.

Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Techno Dance Itch

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
Trent Shipley wrote:


Yeah.  Well that's not quite _it_.

The crucial feature is being able to *group* the receiver appliances into 
groups.

Russell Chapman replied:

I *think* that's what these systems do. Some hear only the backing track 
(ie the filler stuff not being played by anyone on stage), some hear the 
music in total, and some only hear the stage manager's instructions, but 
who hears what can be switched from the backstage console.

I imagine that your dance floor proposal could be done much cheaper than 
these things, and would require less expertise to operate. Perhaps IR could 
be utilised, with ceiling mounted transmitters. IR receiving headphones are 
very cheap in department stores.

Having done a little recording studio and live audio work...

Yes, it's certainly possible to have multiple separate monitor mixes (mixes 
for the headphones or earphones or monitor speakers used by each performer). 
 If there are only one or two separate monitor mixes, the person doing the 
main audience mix might also handle the monitor mix.  Sometimes there are 
separate mixes for each person, and usually that means three or four 
different mixing boards, often located backstage, each manned by a different 
mixer.  I was backstage at a Neville Brothers concert (part of a big 
weekend-long outdoor festival here in KC a few years ago), and I saw no less 
than 5 backstage monitor mixers and two people manning the main audience 
mixing board, and two or three other people setting up mixing boards to be 
used for monitors for the next group.  That's the most mixing boards I've 
ever seen in the same place outside of a music store.

But Trent, for what you're talking about, it's as simple as having low-power 
transmitters on different radio frequencies and headphones that can be tuned 
to those frequencies.

Schools have been doing something similar (only in a wired version) for a 
number of years with keyboard labs.  Each student sits at an electronic 
keyboard with headphones on, and the teacher is able to listen to each 
individual student.  In some systems, the teacher can group two to four 
students who are working on duets or trios or who are each playing a 
separate part of a four-part chorale so that all students in a given group 
hear the keyboards of all the other students in that same group, but no one 
else hears them and they hear no one else.  Many of these systems also have 
microphones built into the headsets so the teacher and student can 
communicate to each other without either one having to get up from their 
desk.  I think I've seen the mixers and headsets sold separately from the 
keyboards.

My wife and I are going to a music education conference in late January 
where they might have some things like that set up in the vendor area.  I'll 
see if there are any wireless systems currently available and sold without 
keyboards and let you know.  You might want to send me a reminder email 
around January 20 or 21.  I think the conference is that following weekend.

Reggie Bautista


_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
Alberto wrote:

I begin to understand why Jeroen was singled-out to
be the victim-of-the-day. Some reasons are obvious:
he *was* a listowner, so our meme of challenge
authority took control. Others are subtle.

And his behaviour in the past days, with mailbombing,
lawsuits, and forged headers, make him a very
tasty target! Who's better to be harassed as someone
who screams and shouts?


So you don't think there should be consequences for
his actions?  Or do you think the consequences should
be something other than being temporarily banned from
posting to the list?


I guess by now everybody will be very pleased,
seeing how he is reacting. I was right! He's not
a member of a civilization! Let's ban him forever!


I think I've only seen one post suggesting the ban
be long-term, and none suggesting it be permanent.
And I for one, and probably several others, certainly
wish it had not come to this.  Very pleased does
not describe my feelings on this, and I doubt very
seriously it describes the feelings of anyone else.

I *like* Jeroen.  On some issues, I even *agree*
with him.


PS: I am _also_ a meme-stereotype. If everybody is
against Jeroen, then I must stand to be the Defender
of the Lost Cause :-)


I always saw you as more of the Trickster type.
Challenging the general feeling of the group would
certainly fit with that.  Sometimes I think the
Tricksters are the most important part of a
society, challenging the status-quo and making us
examine things that we sometimes feel uncomfortable
examining.  So keep up the good work!  :-)

Reggie Bautista


_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: rain

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
On Thursday 05 December 2002 04:01 am, The Fool wrote:
 Suppose you wanted to calculate the time it would take an even 
consistent
 rainfall over the entire surface of the earth to raise the sea level
 above the level of Mt. Everest (+5 miles or so), what would you need to
 know about rainfall, volume of the earth, topography of the earth, etc.
 to make a good first order approximation?

Trent Shipley replied:


For a first order approximation you would throw away topography as
irrelevant (after all, it starts at only 30% and gets smaller as you add
water) and you would treat the Earth as a proper sphere using distance from
the center of the sphere to mean sea level as diameter.

Assume a constant rainfall, not adujsted for the increasing size of the 
sphere
as the ocean gets deeper.  Say, 1 inch per hour, that's a nice hard rain so 
2
feet a day.  It'll take a while to reach 5 miles.

However, if you say wanted to know if it would fit into, say 40 days and 40
nights, you would just assume that it rained 5 miles/40 days, that is
1mile/8days, or 1/8 mile per day.  It would, indeed, require a miracle.

However, the miracle needed to produce such a global deluge would pale 
beside
the erosive effects of so much precipitation.  Where *DID* all that topsoil
come from?

Or perhaps one can assume that flood stories actually refer to widescale 
local or regional flooding, but not global.  Under those circumstances, what 
would be required for a first-order approximation, other than the land area 
affected?

Reggie Bautista


_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
Richard Baker wrote:

My worst case scenario involves giant asteroids, gamma ray bursts,
all-out nuclear exchanges, plague, famine, brain-eating zombie
infestations, leaves on the line, and Steps reforming.


Have you been hacking into my home pc and reading my new novel? :-)

Reggie Bautista
GSV Not that there's an old one


_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
Alberto wrote:

serious
My point is that it's not fair to ban Jeroen without
the consent about the list rules. We didn't agree to
what would be the list rules, and which was the minimum
set of restraint that listmembers should show before
being suspended

And even 40 messages per day can't be considered
mailbombing. I guess even I - who spend too much
time watching TV - have occasionally written 40
messages in one day.
/serious


But what about attempts to hack the server?  Or putting 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as his reply-to address so anyone wanting to reply 
to him actually ends up posting on-list (this can easily be seen as forcing 
others to unwittingly violate nettiquette by posting private email on-list)? 
 Those aren't reasons enough for a temporary posting ban?

Reggie Bautista


_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Open question to the list

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
Nick wrote:

I'm always open to suggestions on how to make
the difficult trade-off between list governance and free-ranging 
discussion,
self-determination as a group, etc.

First, let me state on-list as I did privately in an email to Nick and Julia 
that I support their decision.

In response to what Nick says above, I'd like to pose an open question to 
the list.  I'm interested in responses that apply to governance in general, 
and also specifically to our current situation re: Jeroen.

This question also applies to story that was recently posted (or rather the 
link to the story was posted) concerning the difference between the European 
political worldview and the American political worldview.

Does a truly democratic society need police, or is there some other, better 
way to handle disruptive behavior and those who behave disruptively?

Reggie Bautista


_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko


 Dan Minette wrote:

 2) You could start a good discussion with that 100k exposition on the
 morality of pacifism that you've been owning me. evil grin.

chuckle

And which one would that be?
All I can see in my drafts folder is an unfinished 11k mail on a war
that looks nigh inevitable. :)

And since it took me long years to break myself of the habit of
expounding unasked, you'll have to ask me those questions that you keep
refering to.
g

I'll try to finish it by the next weekend. I am going to be out of town
until mid next week.

 Actually, I'm even looking forward to a small exposition from 
 someone of
 your viewpoint,  wisdom and intellect.

Thank you. I hope you won't be *too* disappointed. :) 
But I really thought those were my reasons for looking forward to this
debate. 

Ritu

PS - Apologies for all those repeated messages guys. My Outlook seems to
be acing up.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Reggie Bautista wrote: 
 
 And his behaviour in the past days, with mailbombing, 
 lawsuits, and forged headers, make him a very 
 tasty target! Who's better to be harassed as someone 
 who screams and shouts? 
  
 So you don't think there should be consequences for 
 his actions? 
 
Yes - cause and effect. But the punishment should 
be comparable to the offense. 
 
 Or do you think the consequences should 
 be something other than being temporarily banned from 
 posting to the list? 
 
Why was he suspended in the first place? AFAIK, 
it was for some reason that *did* have a precedent 
before, from other people. 
 
  
 I always saw you as more of the Trickster type. 
 Challenging the general feeling of the group would 
 certainly fit with that.  Sometimes I think the 
 Tricksters are the most important part of a 
 society, challenging the status-quo and making us 
 examine things that we sometimes feel uncomfortable 
 examining.  So keep up the good work!  :-) 
  
Being the Trickster I can be heard when I say 
things that, coming from other people, would 
be considered offenses :-) 
 
Alberto Uthacalthing 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Open question to the list

2002-12-05 Thread Adam C. Lipscomb
Reggie wrote:
 I'd like to pose an open question to the list.  I'm
 interested in responses that apply to governance in
 general, and also specifically to our current  
 situation re: Jeroen.

*snip*

 Does a truly democratic society need police, or is  
 there some other, better way to handle disruptive  
 behavior and those who behave disruptively?

I've been thinking about this, espcially in light of
some of the complints leveled against Nick and Julia. 
Nick, I think, has de facto authority over the list,
due to the fact that he is providing the hosting, and
it's on his equipment, with software he owns.  Julia
has, in my opinion, shown herself to be levelheaded,
impartial and hard to intimidate, so I pretty
automatically assumed she'd be in some type of
listowner/admin position. 

How should we handle administrative authority on the
list?  

We've got a lot of options, some less palatable than
others.  It's obvious that, in light of both recent
events ond other events in the past, that there is
occasionally a need to move to actively work to rein
in a listmember that is acting inappropriately.  

I'm wondering if we need to set up a three or five
person committee (perhaps with rotating membership) to
deal with stuff like this.  Either elected or
volunteer membership would do, but I'd nominate
Alberto for sure.  

I dunno - it's the bare bones of an idea, and I'm not
sure how the damn thing would work, but it's worth
discussing, I think.  

Or maybe not.  Just throwing out an idea.

Adam


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Ritu Ko wrote: 
  
 PS - Apologies for all those repeated messages guys. 
 My Outlook seems to be acing up. 
 
No problem. The server will block any repeated message. 
Or not? O:-) 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



SCOUTED: Nigerian Scam and Cthulhu

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
This week, User Friendly (a great on-line comic strip) has had Cthulhu 
responding to the Nigerian 419 Scam.  It's pretty funny.

The first strip is at
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20021202
and just click next cartoon for all of the subsequent ones.

Reggie Bautista
Let's hope Nyarlathotep doesn't change my spelling of Cthulhu again...


_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message -
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked


 Reggie Bautista wrote:
 
  And his behaviour in the past days, with mailbombing,
  lawsuits, and forged headers, make him a very
  tasty target! Who's better to be harassed as someone
  who screams and shouts?
 
  So you don't think there should be consequences for
  his actions?
 
 Yes - cause and effect. But the punishment should
 be comparable to the offense.

  Or do you think the consequences should
  be something other than being temporarily banned from
  posting to the list?
 
 Why was he suspended in the first place? AFAIK,
 it was for some reason that *did* have a precedent
 before, from other people.

Who else has repeatedly posted offline email in its entireity?

Who else has repeatedly reacted to someone failing to respond to email by
personally insulting said person?

Who else has repeatedly called for the permanant ouster of another list
member because they either didn't respond to posts or responded offlist?

And, that was just the short period leading up to moderation.  If you
really want to make a case for person X behaving no differently than
persons A-W, yet being singled out, then I think you really have an uphill
battle.

Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Aceing up?

2002-12-05 Thread Ritu Ko


 Dan Minette wrote:

  PS - Apologies for all those repeated messages guys. My 
 Outlook seems to
  be acing up.
 
 If it were just acing up, we'd only get one message.  I'd 
 argue that it was
 treying up. :-)

:P

Ritu
GCU Acting Up

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Dan Minette wrote: 
 
 Why was he suspended in the first place? AFAIK, 
 it was for some reason that *did* have a precedent 
 before, from other people. 
  
 Who else has repeatedly posted offline email in its entireity? 
 
Jeroen. 
 
And wtf does the list have to worry about something that's 
done offlist? 
 
 Who else has repeatedly reacted to someone failing to 
 respond to email by personally insulting said person? 
  
Jeroen. 
 
So, it's in the list rules that offending someone else 
is forbidden? 
 
 Who else has repeatedly called for the permanant ouster 
 of another list member because they either didn't 
 respond to posts or responded offlist? 
 
Jeroen. 
 
So, the rule is: if X requests that Y should be banned, 
then X must be banned?  
 
 And, that was just the short period leading up to 
 moderation.  If you really want to make a case for 
 person X behaving no differently than 
 persons A-W, yet being singled out, then I think you 
 really have an uphill battle. 
 
Jeroen's behavious was no different than any other 
listmember, except for magnitude or intensity. 
If there's no law against drinking alchool, then 
there's no law against getting drunk 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
Alberto wrote:

If there's no law against drinking alchool, then
there's no law against getting drunk


This is a flawed analogy.
In the U.S. at least, there's no law against drinking
alcohol, and no law against getting drunk, but there
are laws against driving while drunk and many
jurisdictions have laws against public drunkenness.
In other words, you can be drunk, but you can't be
drunk in certain places or while doing certain things.

Reggie Bautista


_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Adam C. Lipscomb
Alberto wrote:
 Jeroen's behavious was no different than any other 
 listmember, except for magnitude or intensity. 
 If there's no law against drinking alchool, then 
 there's no law against getting drunk 

That's true, but, at least in the US, there are laws
against being drunk  disorderly in public, and
against driving while drunk.  There are laws against
creating a public nuisance, as well.

Look at it this way:  You're at a bar having a few
drinks.  You get drunk, which is perfectly legal (and
in some degree expected), but then you get abusive,
calling the waitress names when she refuses to serve
you any more drinks.  When the bar manager comes to
talk to you about it, you insult him and threaten to
sue him.  The bar owner then has you escorted
outside the premises by the thick-necked man named
Bruiser.  Once outside, you continue to scream abuse
at the owner, staff and patrons of the bar, going so
far as to try to jimmy open the window of the men's
toilet to slip in that way.  

Are you arguing that you've done nothing wrong, and
should be allowed back into the bar to continue
drinking?

This is stretching the analogy, of course, since
Jeroen is not (as far as we know) under the influence
of alcohol.  He seems to be in full control of his
actions, so he doesn't have the minimal defense of
being under the influence of alcohol.  

I don't support a permanent ban, either, but I do
support efforts to minimize the disruption of abusive
behavior onlist.

Adam C. Lipscomb


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: [azipa] Techno Dance Itch

2002-12-05 Thread Bill Nash

Battery powered, multi-channel FM transmitters (Radio Shack, ~$20) Battery
powered portable FM sport radio (yellow) in compact headset style, or
wristband belt clip. (Radio Shack, ~$20).

Going low tech because high tech is overkill: Priceless.

- billn

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Trent Shipley wrote:

 Last week, being then employed and interested in social activity and exercise,
 I took a free dance lesson from an acquaintance.

 The main thing I learned was that music is a scarce and precious commodity in
 a dance studio.  You can only put one, or at most two, sets of music over the
 loud speaker systems.  Personal systems are *too* personal.  A couple cannot
 coordinate walkmen or even mp3 players.

 WANTED: a wireless audio system for very local broadcasting -- to be used in
 dance studios and dance departments.  (Ideally, somebody already makes this.
 If not, have Motorola give me a call.)

 TARGET MARKETS:
 Dance studios and dance departments or schools. Gymnastics coaches.  Figure
 skaters and coaches.  Personal or small-group trainers who teach rythm
 aerobics.  Other markets for mini-cast audio.


 COMPONENTS:

 Information Appliances (2):

 Personal headset unit with compact receiver and powersource.

 Compact remote control unit.



 Base unit (3 sub-components)

 To be housed on PC, eventual migration to central info-appliance possible.
 Wireless LAN.
 Broadcaster software.

 ==

 RECIEVER UNIT (RU):

 Low bulk, low weight.  Useable by serious amatuer and professional dancers,
 gymnists, aerobicizers, and otherwise friendly to atheletes and interpretive
 artists who need access to audio mini-cast to a small group.   Note that when
 I discussed this with my dancer friend she immediately thought it would be
 good for personal use.  Thus, a version of the reciever appliance will be
 able to store audio in non-volitile memory.  It will include the basic
 command functions listed below.  (That is, in addition to participating as a
 reciever in a LAN mini-cast, some models of reciever unit *must* act exactly
 like current Mp3 players.)

 Reciver units shall have unique serial numbers (eg. MAC addresses) that can be
 aliased by the broadcaster software.  SNs will be used to assign reciever
 appliances to broadcast groups.

 *THE* reason for the mini-cast system is to provide synchronized music to
 small groups in areas with high audio congestion.  Therefore, users must be
 able to configure RUs into mini-cast reception groups.  All recivers in a
 mini-cast group will get the same audio broadcast.  Therefore, system
 implementers will be *very* cautious about using cached data when as RU is a
 member of a reception group that contains any other RUs as members.

 An RU cannot be restricted by line-of-sight.



 COMPACT REMOTE CONTROL UNIT (CRCU):

 Used by coaches and instructors, the remote control units will provide basic
 music control functions such as select song, make bookmark, goto
 bookmark, pause, stop, fast forward, reverse, and--never to be
 forgotten--play.  The designer will *NOT* put excess function into the CRCU.
 Each button shall have one, and *ONLY* one function.

 The RU and CRCU may be integrated into a single assembly.
 It is marginally desirable that a palm-top augmented with appropriate software
 and hardware be able te emulate a CRCU.

 A CRCU cannot be restricted by line-of-sight.


 BASE UNIT (XMITer):

 Early versions of the base unit will be implemented from an Intel or Apple
 computer using mircrowave or RF wireless LAN (eg wireless ethernet).
 Line-of-sight technologies are inappropriate for this application.  The
 wireless LAN must have sufficient bandwidth to support seamless, high quality
 broadcast of at least 5 simultaneous audio programs.

 The ability to add wireless LANs on slightly different frequencies, thereby
 expanding the system, is moderately desirable.

 Software will be included to manage the system (the App).

 The Application Administrator will be able to control storage and access to
 copywritten material, user access, where data is stored, and so on.
 Approprate interfaces will be provided to the App Admin.  A critical job for
 the App Admin will be naming RU and CRCU appliances.  *NOTE* that the App
 Admin is likely to be one or several small business owners with limited legal
 or computer expertise.

 Power users (coaches, instructors, and so on) will be designated by the app
 admin.  They will need to manage their own music, access studio owned music,
 assemble programming for a given class, and so on.  Most importantly, power
 users will need to define a group of RUs that will receive a mini-cast.  They
 will also need to designate the CRCU that will control the mini-cast.

 The only domain expert consulted thus far seemed very interested in a personal
 RU with storage capablity.  While the intital prototype may require aliasing
 a fixed set of RUs and CRCUs, the system will be designed to add and drop RU
 and CRCU 

Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
I wrote:

If I make a really big mistake and
cause a customer to loose several thousand dollars
worth of business, I could get seriously reprimanded
or possibly even fired.


That should be lose, of course.  Darn that Nyarlathotep.

This, by the way, would count as a really small mistake. :-)


Magnitude and intensity make all the difference in
the world.


And spelling does, two. ;-)

Reggie Bautista


_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message -
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked


 Dan Minette wrote:
 
  Why was he suspended in the first place? AFAIK,
  it was for some reason that *did* have a precedent
  before, from other people.
 
  Who else has repeatedly posted offline email in its entireity?
 
 Jeroen.

 And wtf does the list have to worry about something that's
 done offlist?

Because the offline email was posted on list.


  Who else has repeatedly reacted to someone failing to
  respond to email by personally insulting said person?
 
 Jeroen.

 So, it's in the list rules that offending someone else
 is forbidden?

No, it is possible to offend someone simply by giving a reasonable argument
that rebutts something they say.

The list ettiquette rules

1) Say no personal attacks on list
2) Say take exchanges that are getting personal and heated offlist.

When JDG and Jeroen's discussions were turning into flame wars the requests
were

1) Stop it

2) Take it offline

JDG tried to do both recently, but found his efforts thwarted.  It seems
reasonable for JDG to request that something be done about this. It was
clear, to me, that some form of moderation would be used to minimize flame
wars.  Further, even in forums where flame wars predominate, people do not
post off list messages or keep on flaming someone who doesn't reply.


  Who else has repeatedly called for the permanant ouster
  of another list member because they either didn't
  respond to posts or responded offlist?
 
 Jeroen.

 So, the rule is: if X requests that Y should be banned,
 then X must be banned?

No.  The banning has nothing to do with that.  The banning has to do with
actions taken after moderation was started.  Personally, if Jerone actually
did try to hack Nick's computers, then a  ban until he demonstrates that he
has changed enough so that the probability of another hack is miniscular is
most reasonable.  If he actually did something less, like cut and paste
respond to, then a simple promise to not send repeated messages to be
moderated over and over again, costing Nick and Julia a lot of time, sounds
OK to me.

 Jeroen's behavious was no different than any other
 listmember, except for magnitude or intensity.
 If there's no law against drinking alchool, then
 there's no law against getting drunk

Can you come up with a cite where another member has suggested that someone
kill themselves?  Has anyone else put up a wall of shame?  Has anyone else
deliberately posted private email?

Even if you were right, the magnitude and intensity argument has been well
refuted, IMHO, by other posters.  But, let me give one more example.
Simply because someone has not been arrested for going 30.1 kph in a 30
kph school zone doesn't mean that someone should not be arrested and taken
to jail for going 150 kph in a 30 kph school zone.

Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Open question to the list

2002-12-05 Thread William T Goodall
on 5/12/02 4:14 pm, Reggie Bautista at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Does a truly democratic society need police, or is there some other, better
 way to handle disruptive behavior and those who behave disruptively?

Slap drone them.

-- 
William T Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk/


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Nick Arnett
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Alberto Monteiro

...

 serious
 My point is that it's not fair to ban Jeroen without
 the consent about the list rules. We didn't agree to
 what would be the list rules, and which was the minimum
 set of restraint that listmembers should show before
 being suspended

Personal attacks are not okay and the policy on that is quite clear.  In
this case (as we would aim to do with all), we let a lot of them go by
before taking action.  Please recall that I posted a long list of them.

Jeroen isn't banned from the list.  He's moderated.  I've shut off access to
my company's server from his ISP because of attempted hacking, which Jeroen
pretty much admitted to.  Without access to my server, Jeroen can't post to
the list, but that's a result of his hacking, not his behavior on the list.
We'll shut off access to *anybody* who tries to break into my company's
network; that decision is irrelevant to the list.

 And even 40 messages per day can't be considered
 mailbombing. I guess even I - who spend too much
 time watching TV - have occasionally written 40
 messages in one day.
 /serious

It wasn't just 40 messages.  It was 40 duplicates.  And it was the third or
fourth time he'd sent them.  That was just the largest burst.  As I said,
I've been patient, not immediately responding to anything except when I
discovered Jeroen's IP address in our security logs.

Nick

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: [azipa] Techno Dance Itch

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
Bill Nash wrote:


Battery powered, multi-channel FM transmitters (Radio Shack, ~$20) Battery
powered portable FM sport radio (yellow) in compact headset style, or
wristband belt clip. (Radio Shack, ~$20).

Going low tech because high tech is overkill: Priceless.


DOH!  Why didn't I think of this!  I've done sound
designs for a community theater group called Wyandotte
Players, and they use a Radio Shack short-range FM
transmitter and small radios for hearing assistance for
those in the audience who don't hear very well.

The advantage of the other system I posted about is
the talkback channel, but if you don't need that...

Reggie Bautista


_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Toilets! Re: DIY bathroom troubles, Re: Fwd: Religion, the goodside

2002-12-05 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 12/5/2002 9:16:40 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
   Subj:  Re: Toilets! Re: DIY bathroom troubles, Re: Fwd: Religion, thegood side
   Date:  12/5/2002 9:16:40 AM Eastern Standard Time
   From:  Ronn! Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent from the Internet (Details)
 
 
 
 
 At 08:18 PM 12/3/02 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
 
 Toilets are useful things that all of us come in contact with several
 times a day, and when they malfunction, it's a problem.  (Notice that a
 significant portion of the toilet talk is about ones that aren't working
 optimally, at the very least?)
 
 Why is that any different from anyone discussing their computer
 problems?
 
 (At least we haven't had anything resembling an OS war on the toilet
 front!)
 
 
 
 How about regular versus low-flow?
 
 (Which is frequently NO-flow . . .

The alien kidnaps high school students story that our good Dr. Brin is working on has 
the entire hish school transported. All of the toilets become NO-flow.

There. I got the string back on to Brin-esque thoughts.

William Taylor

Phoenix Library computer.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



[ir]rational answer question

2002-12-05 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
Logic question: if an answer to a question relies on changing a principal axiom of the 
Universe, is the answer then irrational (or otherwise invalid)?
 
-j-
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



analogies are evil, why they must be eradicated

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Reggie Bautista wrote: 
 
 If there's no law against drinking alchool, then 
 there's no law against getting drunk 
  
 This is a flawed analogy. 
 
Every analogy is flawed 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: analogies are evil, why they must be eradicated

2002-12-05 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message - 
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:35 PM
Subject: analogies are evil, why they must be eradicated


 
 Every analogy is flawed 

All generalities are false. :-)

Dan M. 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Open question to the list

2002-12-05 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Adam C. Lipscomb wrote: 
  
 I'm wondering if we need to set up a three or five 
 person committee (perhaps with rotating membership) to 
 deal with stuff like this.  Either elected or 
 volunteer membership would do, but I'd nominate 
 Alberto for sure.   
  
Takeover Plan Part Three - complete 
 
evil laughter 
 
Alberto Buyur 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Julia Thompson
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
 
 Dan Minette wrote:
 
  Why was he suspended in the first place? AFAIK,
  it was for some reason that *did* have a precedent
  before, from other people.
 
  Who else has repeatedly posted offline email in its entireity?
 
 Jeroen.
 
 And wtf does the list have to worry about something that's
 done offlist?

Well, if he'd kept the off-list discussion off-list, it probably
wouldn't have gotten to the point where anyone would even *consider*
moderation in the first place. 
 
  Who else has repeatedly reacted to someone failing to
  respond to email by personally insulting said person?
 
 Jeroen.
 
 So, it's in the list rules that offending someone else
 is forbidden?

No, insulting someone repeatedly is frowned upon.  The repeated is
crucial to the whole thing.  If someone wants to get their panties in a
wad because of some of the stuff I posted about NFP bothers them, that's
their problem, but if I repeatedly call someone stupid because I don't
agree with their position, then I deserve some sort of time-out until
I can show a little more respect for people I disagree with.
 
  Who else has repeatedly called for the permanant ouster
  of another list member because they either didn't
  respond to posts or responded offlist?
 
 Jeroen.
 
 So, the rule is: if X requests that Y should be banned,
 then X must be banned?

No, but harping on the subject for a number of weeks and singling out a
particular individual for this treatment is pretty rude, especially when
a number of people have requested it not be done any more.
 
  And, that was just the short period leading up to
  moderation.  If you really want to make a case for
  person X behaving no differently than
  persons A-W, yet being singled out, then I think you
  really have an uphill battle.
 
 Jeroen's behavious was no different than any other
 listmember, except for magnitude or intensity.
 If there's no law against drinking alchool, then
 there's no law against getting drunk

There's no law against drinking alcohol, but there are laws regarding
what you may and may not do beyond a certain point of intoxication.  If
you want to get so drunk you fall down, that's fine, just don't get
behind the wheel of a car shortly before passing out from the alcohol.

If A post an insult to B maybe twice a year, that can be tolerated.  A
posting an insult to B five times a day and making more aggressive
demands than mere insult will not be tolerated here.

And if it had *only* been the insulting, I would have protested the
original request at moderation.  It was the more aggressive behavior
that lost Jeroen a potential ally among the admins.  (And if it had only
been the insults, I bet John would not have made as strong a case to the
admins.)

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Open question to the list

2002-12-05 Thread Miller, Jeffrey


 -Original Message-
 From: Reggie Bautista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 08:15 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Open question to the list
 
 
 Nick wrote:
 I'm always open to suggestions on how to make
 the difficult trade-off between list governance and free-ranging
 discussion,
 self-determination as a group, etc.
 
 First, let me state on-list as I did privately in an email to 
 Nick and Julia 
 that I support their decision.

Ditto.  I unsubbed a while back to get away from the noise, and finally decided that 
after 4-ish years on the list, I missed it more than Jeroen bothered me, so I was 
willing to give it another shot. 

 In response to what Nick says above, I'd like to pose an open 
 question to 
 the list.  I'm interested in responses that apply to 
 governance in general, 
 and also specifically to our current situation re: Jeroen.

Its always a tricky thing, isn't it?  I mean, its not something you generally have to 
worry about until someone steps over the line in a fashion like Jeroen has.  Anger, 
dispute, a flame or two, that's all understandable, even important to an 
intellectually challenging and passionate community, but how does one deal with 
someone who's thrashing threatens to capsize all else?

I don't have a good answer for your question Nick, despite having gone through this 
exact situation on 3 of my seattle-gaming lists with a certain person who had a 
similar approach as Jeroen IRT the community as a whole.  I ended up unsubbing the 
person rather than banning them; 6 months later, they resubbed, participated nicely, 
then exploded into an angerball, forcing me to unsub them again.  its been ~6 months 
since then, and I expect them to resub any day and the cycle to begin anew.

 Does a truly democratic society need police, or is there some 
 other, better 
 way to handle disruptive behavior and those who behave disruptively?

Police have important social roles as well as law-enforcement.  I was pleasently 
surprised this morning to see a motorcycle cop helping a man to change a tire on I-5 
(instead of the usual pepper-spray and tear-gas Seattle PD response..)

-j-
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Ouch! (was RE: Open question to the list)

2002-12-05 Thread Nick Arnett
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Miller, Jeffrey

...

 Police have important social roles as well as law-enforcement.  I
 was pleasently surprised this morning to see a motorcycle cop
 helping a man to change a tire on I-5 (instead of the usual
 pepper-spray and tear-gas Seattle PD response..)

They do that to you just for getting a flat tire!?  Remind me not to drive
in Seattle any more.

Nick

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:52:47 -0600


- Original Message -
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked


 Dan Minette wrote:
 
  Why was he suspended in the first place? AFAIK,
  it was for some reason that *did* have a precedent
  before, from other people.
 
  Who else has repeatedly posted offline email in its entireity?
 
 Jeroen.

 And wtf does the list have to worry about something that's
 done offlist?

Because the offline email was posted on list.


They were also posted on brin-l.com, which was the list's website.  They 
were also sent to multiple listmembers offlist because they couldn't be 
posted here.


  Who else has repeatedly reacted to someone failing to
  respond to email by personally insulting said person?
 
 Jeroen.



snip



  Who else has repeatedly called for the permanant ouster
  of another list member because they either didn't
  respond to posts or responded offlist?
 
 Jeroen.

 So, the rule is: if X requests that Y should be banned,
 then X must be banned?

No.  The banning has nothing to do with that.  The banning has to do with
actions taken after moderation was started.  Personally, if Jerone actually
did try to hack Nick's computers, then a  ban until he demonstrates that he
has changed enough so that the probability of another hack is miniscular is
most reasonable.  If he actually did something less, like cut and paste
respond to, then a simple promise to not send repeated messages to be
moderated over and over again, costing Nick and Julia a lot of time, sounds
OK to me.


Also, his chello.nl address has been blocked, but that's because an attack 
was registered from that isp on the mccmedia server, not as a result of the 
original reasons he was being moderated (if I understand things correctly).  
Unless I'm mistaken, Jeroen still has the ability to post to brin-l from his 
work address at mindef.nl, or any other address he chooses to subscribe 
from.  I believe he would also be moderated if he posts from another 
address?


 Jeroen's behavious was no different than any other
 listmember, except for magnitude or intensity.
 If there's no law against drinking alchool, then
 there's no law against getting drunk

Can you come up with a cite where another member has suggested that someone
kill themselves?  Has anyone else put up a wall of shame?  Has anyone else
deliberately posted private email?



Jeroen only threatened to put up a Brin-L wall of shame.  AFAIK, he never 
did, unless I missed something.

Offlist e-mail also isn't the only private thing Jeroen has posted to the 
list within the past few months.  He also posted the entire Brin-L 
subscriber list, with names and e-mails.  This is not something any 
Brinneller could have done.

No other Brinneller could have posted threats to John, Juilia and Nick on 
Brin-L.com.  Yes, they could have posted threats on their own websites, but 
not the official list site.

Jon

_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Miller, Jeffrey


 -Original Message-
 From: Jon Gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:32 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked
 
 
 From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked
 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:52:47 -0600
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:08 AM
 Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked
 
 
   Dan Minette wrote:
   
Why was he suspended in the first place? AFAIK,
it was for some reason that *did* have a precedent 
 before, from 
other people.
   
Who else has repeatedly posted offline email in its entireity?
   
   Jeroen.
  
   And wtf does the list have to worry about something that's done 
   offlist?
 
 Because the offline email was posted on list.
 
 They were also posted on brin-l.com, which was the list's 
 website.  They 
 were also sent to multiple listmembers offlist because they 
 couldn't be 
 posted here.

Yes, and receiving 40 copies of the same darn email flooded my yahoo account, shutting 
it down, and caused me to lose an eBay auction.

Hey.. *perks up*  maybe I can sue! ;)

-j-
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Miller, Jeffrey


 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:37 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote:
  That should be lose, of course.  Darn that Nyarlathotep.
 
 Darn that WHAT? I can't find it in my dictionary. Maybe I'm 
 missing a play on words?

Cthulhu mythos god-alien-monster
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Adam C. Lipscomb
Erik wondered:
 On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Reggie 
Bautista wrote:
  That should be lose, of course.  Darn that 
  Nyarlathotep.

 Darn that WHAT? I can't find it in my dictionary.  
 Maybe I'm missing a play on words?


http://www.deliverance.mcmail.com/lovecraft/nyarlathotep.htm

or 

http://makeashorterlink.com/?B2A932CA2

Nyarlathotep is one of the dark Old Ones of H. P.
Lovecraft's Cthulhu mythos.  Very bad juju, baas.  You
no wanna mess wit' him.

Adam
THE HORROR!  THE HORROR

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Steve Sloan II
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote:

  That should be lose, of course.  Darn that Nyarlathotep.

Erik Reuter wrote:

 Darn that WHAT? I can't find it in my dictionary. Maybe
 I'm missing a play on words?

Nyarlathotep was the name of a chaotic god-like character
from H.P. Lovecraft's weird tales.
__
Steve Sloan . Huntsville, Alabama = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brin-L list pages .. http://www.brin-l.org
Chmeee's 3D Objects  http://www.sloan3d.com/chmeee
3D and Drawing Galleries .. http://www.sloansteady.com
Software  Science Fiction, Science, and Computer Links
Science fiction scans . http://www.sloan3d.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:

 Please accept my apologies for this - I have started sending at least
 5 replies to Jeroen for every spam I get, and he has apparently,
 through a simple (and childish) trick, ensured they come to the list
 as a whole.

I don't think it was intended as a trick. And  I feel that you at least
could take into consideration that Jeroen cannot at the moment defend
himself on-list. Then again if it really was a trick he pulled on you,
just have the decency to don't blame Jeroen for being clever at your
expense. You'd have done better hitting yourself over the head a few
times for falling for it and because you didn't check the reply to field
before sending a little mailbomb of your own making. grin

So just for the record I also think that you, Adam are at least as
childish as Jeroen in replying multiple times to something without adding
any actual content. Jeroen in his off-list mail (even if it is
unsolicited by you and/or others) can at least be granted the benifit of
the doubt for trying to make a point he feels very strongly about and
that he at present and probably in any forseable future isn't allowed to
make on this list.

Sonja

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Scouted: Punch reviving on the net

2002-12-05 Thread Jon Gabriel
http://media.guardian.co.uk/newmedia/story/0,7496,853847,00.html
Punch, the 161-year-old satirical magazine that closed down earlier this
year, is being reborn on the Web.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Scouted: The new Two Towers Trailer

2002-12-05 Thread Jon Gabriel
Is available online at:
http://www.apple.com/trailers/newline/the_two_towers-teaser/
It's even available for download, although you need apple Quicktime to
play it. :-)

Jon
VFP We Live For The One, We Die For The wait, wrong universe.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Marvin Long, Jr.
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 You are a very evil person... 

I try, thank you.

[blinks innocently] 

 My point is that it's not fair to ban Jeroen without 
 the consent about the list rules. We didn't agree to 
 what would be the list rules, and which was the minimum 
 set of restraint that listmembers should show before 
 being suspended 

That's a good point.  However,

{set pontificate=Yes}

In all my years on Brin-L, despite numerous attempts, I've never seen the
list produce even a means for producing a decision by consensus, much less
a decision itself.  Not for lack of suggestions or technical skill, I
suspect, but because not enough people are willing to be bothered or
willing to trust another to be in charge of a formal system.  If that is
indeed the case, then it's unrealistic to expect Brin-L to behave like a
participatory democracy in which people vote on rules and the application
of rules.

Rather, in the terms of my own evil analogy, we are like a free social
club hosted in someone's home (Nick's server now, Cornell's server by way
of Eileen and Hector in days of yore).  We can come and go any time we
please.  The only restriction on listmember behavior, de facto, is what
the host and fellow listmembers, by way of the host, are willing to
tolerate.  The only restriction on host (listowner) behavior is what the
guests are willing to tolerate.  Thus the organizational principle of
Brin-L is not discussion and formal consent but is the bare fact of
participation itself.

If moderating or banning someone is against our collective sense of
fairness in the given social context, then we may scream in protest or we
may vote with our feet by unsubscribing; but to expect parliamentary
procedure is unrealistic, and because we know this, we should be prepared
to accept that the only justice available is poetic, so to speak -- a
matter of social cause and effect.  If Nick and Julia are jerks, for
example, then poetic justice will take the form of everybody leaving and
starting a new list elsewhere.

The advantage to such a system is that it suits the lack of effort we
appear to be willing to put into collective self-governance.  The
disadvantage is that it is prone to the explicit or tacit tyranny of the
majority where unpopular behavior or opinions are concerned.  The question 
on the conscience of every listmember ought to be, then, at what point 
does unpopular-but-protected become uncivil-and-punishable?

I wish it were otherwise - being socially inept myself, I hate anything
that smells cliquish - but I see no reason to expect things ever actually
to be otherwise, and I'm a sufficiently evil hypocrite to be content with
the current system as long as it works sufficiently to my own perceived
benefit.

Therefore:  there is not, has never been, and will never be a court of 
consensus or appeal except for our own selves.  If one believes an 
injustice is being committed, one must say so, leave, or decide it's not 
worth the trouble to interfere.

{set pontificate=No}

 And even 40 messages per day can't be considered 
 mailbombing. I guess even I - who spend too much 
 time watching TV - have occasionally written 40 
 messages in one day. 

That's true.  Mailbombing, as I understand it, is flooding a server with 
so much mail it crashes.  For just being an annoying git, the term 
mailbomb is hyperbole.

Marvin Long
Austin, Texas
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld,  Ashcroft, LLP (Formerly the USA)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Ouch! (was RE: Open question to the list)

2002-12-05 Thread Miller, Jeffrey


 -Original Message-
 From: Nick Arnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:12 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Ouch! (was RE: Open question to the list)
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
  Behalf Of Miller, Jeffrey
 
 ...
 
  Police have important social roles as well as 
 law-enforcement.  I was 
  pleasently surprised this morning to see a motorcycle cop helping a 
  man to change a tire on I-5 (instead of the usual pepper-spray and 
  tear-gas Seattle PD response..)
 
 They do that to you just for getting a flat tire!?  Remind me 
 not to drive in Seattle any more.

Well, the trick is whether or not they /tell/ you they're a cop first.  That's the 
tricky part.

-j-

(there was a case here recently where an off-duty sherrif in plain clothes drew a gun 
on a pair of men sitting in their truck who were not visibily breaking the law (other 
than being black in a white suburb.) The officer fired several times into the truck, 
killing one man and wounding the other, at which time he THEN informed them he was a 
police officer..)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Tails as the newest 'fashion fad'?, Re: meeces

2002-12-05 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Erik Reuter wrote:

 I wouldn't mind having a *prehensile* tail. A useless drooping one
 wouldn't be so useful, though.

It could be the newest fashion statement however. Comparing ta ... oops ... ah
well. Let's not go there. blush

Sonja

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Horn, John
 From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 But what about attempts to hack the server?
 
 That is something that happened *only* because Arnett 
 willingly violated 
 list policy again, so he has no right to take any action 
 against me anyway. 

Isn't that a bit like saying that since the bank messed up my checking
account, no one should get mad that I tried to break in to the vault?  And I
certainly shouldn't be punished or jailed...

  - jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Julia Thompson
Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
 
 Please accept my apologies for this - I have started sending at least
 5 replies to Jeroen for every spam I get, and he has apparently,
 through a simple (and childish) trick, ensured they come to the list
 as a whole.

Speaking of childish, isn't doing more than tit-for-tat (i.e., rejecting
each one back to him just once) childish?  :)  Wouldn't it be a lot more
effective to set up some sort of system that just bounces everything he
sends you back to him, so you never have to worry about it after setting
it up?  Wouldn't it be great if there were an easily-obtained software
solution that could do this for you?  [Cue Fool with a recommendation of
such a product.]

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: analogies are evil, why they must be eradicated

2002-12-05 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 12/5/2002 11:36:54 AM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
   
   Every analogy is flawed 
  
  All generalities are false. :-)
  

All generals who flaunt their falsies are anal.  [Gee.]

William Taylor
-
Logic server blocked.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
I wrote:

 That should be lose, of course.  Darn that Nyarlathotep.


Erik replied:

Darn that WHAT? I can't find it in my dictionary. Maybe I'm missing a
play on words?


Nyarlathotep is one of the elder gods, along with
Cthulhu and others, in the stories of H. P. Lovecraft.

In a message within the past week, I mis-spelled Cthulhu
which was pointed out to me by Alberto.  I replied by
stating that I had spelled Cthulhu correctly but somehow
it had gotten changed after I sent it, and then I
insinuated that it was Nyarlathotep's fault.  So I
figured with another mis-spelling, I could blame it on
Nyarlathotep again.
:-)

Reggie Bautista


_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Adam C. Lipscomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
 - Original Message -
 From: J. van Baardwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Recipient list suppressed
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:09 PM
 Subject: Re: Admin: Server access blocked

rest of 10K message deleted

I just got TEN of these in a row - what is going on? 
I realize that I still have 150+ messages to check,
but I see that quite a few have this same
thread/subject.  :(

Preparing To Delete Unread Maru

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Baker
Debbi said:

 I just got TEN of these in a row - what is going on? 

Some might view it as a mailing list equivalent of the French
Revolution. Others may well consider it escalating childishness.

Rich
GCU Who Will Be Our Napoleon?

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



For your entertainment, Re: Assumptions

2002-12-05 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Russell Chapman wrote:

 Russell Chapman wrote:

  Sonja
  GCU smileys are our friends
 
  And that's the best news I've heard all day... I'd hate to miss out on
  your next plumbing adventure. I'm waiting to hear that having sorted
  out the water supply, the drains are all broken, or the floor has
  collapsed, or any of those misadventures that seem to befall us when
  we get too adventurous...

 Aaaagh  - and then I forgot smilies D'oh!
 Please rest assured that while I do wish to hear your entertaining tales
 about the renovations, I most definitely do not wish any misadventures
 on you or your house at all...

Ok, since the discussion is verging toward toilets anyway I might as well
sent my  .. ehum.. adventures of the day since they center on installing the
toilet as well. After taking two days to get back on track after .. eh ...
let's call it euphemistically .. discovering the exact position of the water
conduit in our wall while installing the tub, I finally managed to install
the tub properly... for the time being that is. So it is where it is
supposed to be, resting on the feet it is supposed to rest on, with a
improvised one for the sitting part (that so 'kindly' wasn't supplied by the
bath manufacturer I might add). I is astonishingly enough actually level and
useable, although with a bit of caution as to splashing water around since
it hasn't it's waterresistant finish, ..  yet insert applause,
please Luckily the tub went where the shower area was, so no further
plumbing required. I used the old connection for the showerdrain to plug the
drain from the bath into. Not as straight forward but after some rethinking
the original idea I have good hopes that it will work to our satisfaction
ones I've found the right piece for making the connection watertight.

So that brings us on to the toilet. It has to be installed into more or less
the space where the old toilet was, only now it is a hanging toilet that is
placed under an angle toward the corner instead of flat onto nearly the
middle of the wall. In order to keep the original wastepipe in place we had
to 'lego' different waste pipe angles, straight parts and different waste
pipe sorts together. The considerations that lead to the final somewhat wild
looking but totally valid construction were
1) We have a big waste pipe so restriction in applying reasonable angles
aren't going to be an issue very much.
2) We'd like to keep the original waste pipe in place, just in case we'd
have to move and they are demanding restoring the old situation.
3) We don't want to glue the PVC pipes together because we might change our
minds altogether and get the shower back NOT A CHANCE IN HELL after all
this. I hope eh...

So lucky for us there is this very nice new stuff on the market with very
nice rubber fittings that make it possible for any laymen to puzzle a
suitable and airtight PVC pipeform together without having to glue the
stuff. I loved doing that... I mean that was the sentiment afterwardsI
think eh...

Then the horror really began. The wooden carrier frame for the (toward the
corner) angled hanging toiled we intended to make was a bit of a challenge.
We had to carve out a few pieces, the waste pipe was in the way so we had to
reconsider a few things and when we finally managed to put something
together it actually looks pretty darn nice and is even very sturdy. or
... it ... is  ... gonne ... eh  be when it is going to be finally
finished ... I hope... grin

So on to the rest what rest?... We worked hard and that is all we did?
Jeez doesn't sound like an awfull lot when you look at it Ah well I
have good hopes that tomorrow I'll be able to finish placing the toilet into
it's final position, I might even get to connect it up to the original water
supply. Sounds easy enough I'll let you know what happened.

Oh, and just to show you I'm not totally stupid this little anectdote

My father inlaw was unpacking his really big drill to make a hole in the
floor to fix the second floorsupport of the hanging toilet to. I made him
wait. Almost had to get physical but finally he relented. I think he felt he
was humoring me because he understood that I just didn't want a repeat
performance from last Sunday. I really feel that one punctured water pipe
per job is more than enough. So I got out my little gadget for finding those
nasty little metal surprises where you want to drill and after callibration
put it where the hole was supposed to go. Can you guess? ..
BIEIEIEIEP and yes, no hole, we found another way to safely support the
whole structure. YAY. Darn I'm good. very broad self rightious grin

Oh oh, who do I hear coming over the roof riding on his horse I believe
it is 'Sinter Klaas'. I really should get to bed now, or Tom will find no
surprise in his shoe tomorrow. And I don't want that on my conscience, now
do I.

Sonja ;o)
GCU, 'nuf damage for one day


Stag Film Serenade

2002-12-05 Thread Marvin Long, Jr.

From our local independent movie theater, this ad is too good not to 
share...

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:35:55 -0600
Subject: Alamo Drafthouse Showtimes and events 12/06/02

[snip]

SWINGING STAG NIGHT!
vintage 70's stag films - live sound effects!
DISCO DOLLS IN HOT SKIN
presented in STAG-O-VISION!
SUNDAY, DEC 8, 7:00  9:45
We at the Alamo Drafthouse Cinema are proud to unveil our latest concept in
movie entertainment: STAG-O-VISION!Vintage XXX stag films from the
1970's with the original audio completely muted.  In its place, our
precision sound-effects crew will be recreating ALL of the sounds from the
movie, redubbing all of the outrageous dialog, and delivering all the
requisite gritty wah-wah guitar licks  100% LIVE IN THE THEATER!  And if
that weren't enough, our very first feature of this series is also in 3-D!
That's right, 3-D!, and the third- dimension has never been so amply filled
as with Disco Dolls in Hot Skin, featuring stag legends Serena and John
Holmes.   Billed as the real Boogie Nights, Disco Dolls in Hot Skin
played to packed houses the last time it was in town, and that was without
the live foley effects!  We recommend advance purchase tickets for this
one, its going to be a barn-burner!
http://www.drafthouse.com/frames.asp?l=downtownb=online_tix/show_details.as
p?show_id=535

[snip]

Marvin Long
Austin, Texas
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld,  Ashcroft, LLP (Formerly the USA)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Admin: Server access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Gary Nunn
 Speaking of childish, isn't doing more than tit-for-tat (i.e., rejecting
 each one back to him just once) childish?  :)  Wouldn't it be a lot more
 effective to set up some sort of system that just bounces everything he
 sends you back to him, so you never have to worry about it after setting
 it up?  Wouldn't it be great if there were an easily-obtained software
 solution that could do this for you?  [Cue Fool with a recommendation of
 such a product.]


Mailwasher

www.mailwasher.net
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Scouted: Punch reviving on the net

2002-12-05 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 12/5/2002 1:50:28 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Punch, the 161-year-old satirical magazine that closed down earlier this
  year, is being reborn on the Web.

Ah, memories. I used to have 20 bound volumes of it. One being a Volume 
Twenty with 3/4 of the original spine.

For $200 I once sold the Shanghai China Punch-like volume. Thousands of miles 
from home, and the British still had to have a British humor magazine.

William Taylor
-
Will it have that cartoon caption contest?

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: For your entertainment, Re: Assumptions

2002-12-05 Thread Russell Chapman
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:


2) We'd like to keep the original waste pipe in place, just in case we'd
have to move and they are demanding restoring the old situation.


Um - are you leasing/renting this place? I'd always assumed from the 
sheer amount of hard work (not mentioning expense) that you've put into 
it that you had bought the house.

Glad it's coming together at last!

Cheers
Russell C.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: For your entertainment, Re: Assumptions

2002-12-05 Thread Julia Thompson
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:

 So lucky for us there is this very nice new stuff on the market with very
 nice rubber fittings that make it possible for any laymen to puzzle a
 suitable and airtight PVC pipeform together without having to glue the
 stuff. I loved doing that... I mean that was the sentiment afterwardsI
 think eh...

Oh, man, when I think about the effort put into installing the water
conditioner here, and how much of the trouble could have been avoided
with that  It was almost heartbreaking, watching the guy sent out to
install the thing having problems with it in the August heat for so
long.  (It would have been nice to have been able to flush the toilets
during the 2 hour period that was supposed to only be 30-45 minutes, as
well.)

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Fred Haber, RIP

2002-12-05 Thread Nick Arnett
My wife just called to tell me that one of our favorite people from church,
Fred Haber, died this afternoon.  None of you probably know who he is, and
I'm not sure if you'll find his name in any histories of the space program,
but Fred was the launch control officer at Vandenberg and other places for
about three decades of the space program.  He was the guy who decided if a
rocket got to go or not.

I often forgot about Fred's background in the space program.  He has been
retired for a while, so my memories of him are mostly his leadership of our
Saturday morning men's breakfast fellowship, heading our buildings and
grounds group and making the Men of Monday happen -- some guys whose wives
were quilting at the church on Monday decided that they'd come along, bring
their tools and fix stuff.  He was a quiet guy who did what needed to be
done.

I had asked him a week ago Saturday if he was worried about the bypass
surgery that he had on Tuesday.  Nope, he said.  He'd gotten to know his
doctor very well and trusted him completely.  A friend had undergone the
same surgery a year ago, same doctor, same hospital, with no problems.  And
he said his wife, Audrey, wasn't worried, either.  The surgery went well,
but somehow his heart gave out this afternoon.  I'm sad.

We lost a couple of our other favorite people from church in the last week.
It's been a difficult time for that community.

I know that although most everyone on the list is interested in the space
program to one extent or another, Fred's death is a small one.  But hey,
writing this helps me.

Nick

--
Nick Arnett
Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



List On The Brink?

2002-12-05 Thread Kevin Street
Okay, what the hell is going on? For various reasons, I haven't been reading
Brin-L much lately, but today I came back and scanned through the messages,
only to find that Jeroen has become some kind of Typhoid Mary who has to be
censored from the list for its own protection, or something. It isn't very
clear.

What did he do to get himself totally banned? If you don't want to discuss
this matter on-list any further I understand, but if that's so could someone
please tell me what's going on in a private Email? Because frankly, I'm
confused, or to be more accurate, stunned, as to how this situation came
about. Jeroen is a long time list member. Yes, his continual campaign to
avenge any and all slights to his honour is annoying, but even at his
off-list, spamming worst I still find him *orders of magnitude* less
annoying than some trolls of the recent past. (Hiya, Wilbur07. Nice to see
you're still here.)

From the peanut gallery, it looks like Jeroen's recent activities (IE:
threatening lawsuits, forging return addresses, and what not) are
semi-hysterical responses to his posts being moderated in the first place,
and that's what I don't understand. Yes, his conduct has been pretty lousy
lately, but why did the list-owners, moderators, or whatever they're called,
drive him to do it in the first place? Why have you been pushing his
buttons?

What's happened to this place?

Kevin Street


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Adam: Sandler access blocked

2002-12-05 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 12/5/2002 3:44:49 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Who Will Be Our Napoleon?
  

And who will be the Beef Wellington?

William Taylor
-
Oh for the younger Woody
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: List On The Brink?

2002-12-05 Thread Nick Arnett
This should explain:

http://www.mccmedia.com/pipermail/brin-l/Week-of-Mon-20021118/004507.html

But there are reasons to be hopeful that things will soon be back to
more-or-less normal.

Nick

--
Nick Arnett
Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Kevin Street
 Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 4:31 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: List On The Brink?


 Okay, what the hell is going on?

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



bread

2002-12-05 Thread The Fool
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns3144

Eating too much refined bread and cereal, rather than chocolate and
greasy foods, may be the culprit behind the pimples that plague many a
youngster.
That is the theory of a team led by Loren Cordain, an evolutionary
biologist at Colorado State University in Fort Collins. Highly processed
breads and cereals are easily digested. The resulting flood of sugars
makes the body produce high levels of insulin and insulin-like growth
factor (IGF-1).
This in turn leads to an excess of male hormones. These encourage pores
in the skin to ooze large amounts of sebum, the greasy goop that
acne-promoting bacteria love. IGF-1 also encourages skin cells called
keratinocytes to multiply, a hallmark of acne, the team say in a paper
that will appear in the December issue of Archives of Dermatology.
An Australian team will soon test the theory by putting 60 teenage boys
with acne on a low-carbohydrate diet for three months to see if it makes
a difference.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: bread

2002-12-05 Thread Reggie Bautista
The Fool wrote:


http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns3144

Eating too much refined bread and cereal, rather than chocolate and
greasy foods, may be the culprit behind the pimples that plague many a
youngster.


Very intersting.  So after the connection between
diet and pimples has been debunked, it may turn
out to have been close to the mark after all!

Reggie Bautista


_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: bread

2002-12-05 Thread Russell Chapman
The Fool wrote:


http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns3144

Eating too much refined bread and cereal, rather than chocolate and
greasy foods, may be the culprit behind the pimples that plague many a
youngster.


If it turns out that I spurned chocolate and chips (fries for you USAns) 
throughout all those years for nothing I'm going to be seriously pissed 
off. I mean those were the years when I was sufficiently active that 
putting on weight was never an issue - I only avoided them to avoid 
pimples... Now I don't have to worry about pimples, but a sedentary job 
and insufficient physical activity in my limited spare time mean I still 
can't eat them as I'd like to...

Cheers
Russell C.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: List On The Brink?

2002-12-05 Thread Steve Sloan II
Kevin Street wrote:

 Okay, what the hell is going on? For various reasons, I
 haven't been reading Brin-L much lately, but today I came
 back and scanned through the messages, only to find that
 Jeroen has become some kind of Typhoid Mary who has to be
 censored from the list for its own protection, or something.
 It isn't very clear.

I've been following it closely, and I'm not too clear on
it myself...
__
Steve Sloan . Huntsville, Alabama = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brin-L list pages .. http://www.brin-l.org
Chmeee's 3D Objects  http://www.sloan3d.com/chmeee
3D and Drawing Galleries .. http://www.sloansteady.com
Software  Science Fiction, Science, and Computer Links
Science fiction scans . http://www.sloan3d.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Stag Film Serenade

2002-12-05 Thread Erik Reuter
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:05:27PM -0600, Marvin Long, Jr. wrote:

 requisite gritty wah-wah guitar licks 100% LIVE IN THE THEATER!  And
 if that weren't enough, our very first feature of this series is
 also in 3-D!  That's right, 3-D!, and the third- dimension has never
 been so amply filled as with Disco Dolls in Hot Skin, featuring stag
 legends Serena and John

How can you take a film originally shot in 2D and show it in 3D? For 3D,
you need a parallax view of some sort, two cameras or a special camera.

Marvin, you'll have to go and report back. You have your assignment...


-- 
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Fwd: FC: Canada's high court says 5-4 that engineered mouse not patentable (was Re: meeces)

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship

Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:27:03 -0500
To: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jason Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Harvard can't patent mice in Canada

Declan,

After nearly 18 years of appeals up through the courts, the Supreme Court 
of Canada today decided, in a 5-4 split, that a higher life form is not 
patentable because it is not a manufacture or composition of matter 
within the meaning of invention in the Patent Act. Harvard had been 
trying to claim patent protection on the process by which so-called 
'oncomice' are produced and the end product of the process.

The minority, in dissent, argued that the human modfication of every single 
cell in the body of an animal which does not in this altered form exist in 
nature is an inventive composition of matter within the meaning of the 
Patent Act. They also observed that the oncomouse had now been patented in 
Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, 
Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, the United 
Kingdom and the United States. A similar patent has been issued in Japan. 
New Zealand has issued a patent for a transgenic mouse that has been 
genetically modified to be susceptible to HIV infection. Indeed, we were 
not told of any country with a patent system comparable to Canada's (or 
otherwise) in which a patent on the oncomouse had been applied for and been 
refused.

However, the majority argued that although the Patent Act is designed to 
advance research and development and encourage broader economic activity, 
it simply does not follow from the objective of promoting ingenuity that 
all inventions must be patentable and the fact that the Patent Act in its 
current state is ill-equipped to deal appropriately with higher life forms 
as patentable subject matter is an indication that Parliament never 
intended the definition of invention to extend to this type of subject matter.

The court's finding can be summed thusly: regardless of whether the Court 
thinks the oncomouse is deserving of patent protection, the language of the 
Act does not permit it and the significant values implicated by such a 
finding dissuades the Court from reading in that intent. It is up to 
Parliament to situate the line between lower life forms (which are 
patentable) and higher life forms, including humans, with regards to 
patentability.

Here's the decision: Harvard College v. Canada 2002 SCC 76, paras. 169-170, 
online: LexUM http://www.shorl.com/gupukutyhabry.
Story on CBC http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/12/05/scc_mouse021205

Best,

Jason
--

---
http://www.lexinformatica.org
http://www.privaterra.org
http://www.epic.org
PGP KeyID 0x46E11518




-
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
-
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
-


--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: nuts

2002-12-05 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Kneem wrote]
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s734326.htm
 
 Nuts lower diabetes risk, not fattening
 Thursday, 28 November  2002
 Nuts can dramatically reduce your risks of
 developing type 2 diabetes
 
 Eating nuts substantially lowers the risk of
 developing type 2 diabetes and 
 does not lead to weight gain, a large-scale American
 study of women has 
 found - a result that is likely to also apply to
 men.

And an article I posted for our office health news:
http://my.webmd.com/printing/article/1671.53518

...Compared with men who were not big nut eaters,
those who ate nuts at least twice a week were about
half as likely to fall victim to sudden heart death.
And the nut eaters were 30% less likely to die from
heart disease, according to researcher Christine M.
Albert, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women's Hospital in
Boston, and colleagues...

...Lichtenstein says it's most likely the omega 3
fatty acids found in nuts that provide protection
against the heart rhythm problems that can lead to
sudden death. 

Researchers say walnuts contain especially high
amounts of these fatty acids compared with other types
of nuts. Nuts are also rich in magnesium, potassium,
and vitamin E, all of which have the ability to
protect the heart, according to the researchers. In
addition, nuts contain substances known as flavonoids,
which have recently been shown to reduce the risk of
heart-related deaths. 

Flavanoids are also found in green and black tea.

Chock-Full Of Goodness Maru

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Why the metric system is wrong

2002-12-05 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- J. van Baardwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 The metric system wrong? That is heresy, heresy I
 tell ya!   GRIN
 
http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/books/12/02/alder.measure/index.html
 
 There is a message of hope near the end of the
 article, though:
 
 Eventually, he says, Americans will fully adjust.
 The metric system was 
 meant to be global, and the meter created by the
 surveyors has become the worldwide standard.

Still, the last sentences are (in compliance with your
header):
Yes, the actual length of the meter -- compared with
what was intended -- is a mistake. But it's a mistake
that has transformed the world, as the book's
subtitle has it. 

That is why, Alder says, Delambre and Mechain's
meter -- created 'for all people, for all time' -- was
in fact an error for all people, for all time. 

Vindication for the rod, the fathom, the hand!
mMMWA-hahaha!  ;D

Debbi
5 feet, 4 inches Maru
(Darby being 14 hands, 3 inches @ the withers)

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



  1   2   >