[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp for uccx server

2013-08-02 Thread Karen Johnson
all,
 
do we need to set ntp for uccx server in exam ? and how to do it ?
 
K___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP issue

2013-04-04 Thread ikizoo4 kwon
Hi all,HQ router has ntp source loopback 0 already and they ask to reference 
voice vlan of HQ from CUE.is there any way to meet this requirement?
- not be able to ntp sourcing 2 interface, as fas as i know- just point to 
voice vlan from CUE not get ntp synced up  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP issue

2013-04-04 Thread Jeff 20437
ntp source loopback 0 is only required when the HQ router is a NTP peer
or as an NTP client(requests would be sourced from this interfaces IP).

You're second point is the way you should go.  Point CUE to the voice vlan
interface on the HQ router and it will respond from that interface.

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:25 AM, ikizoo4 kwon ikiz...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,
 HQ router has ntp source loopback 0 already and they ask to reference
 voice vlan of HQ from CUE.
 is there any way to meet this requirement?

 - not be able to ntp sourcing 2 interface, as fas as i know
 - just point to voice vlan from CUE not get ntp synced up

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP issue

2013-04-04 Thread ikizoo hello
thanks for clarification, let me check CUE side more.

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP issue
From: b...@ucguerrilla.com
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:35:40 -0400
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
To: ikiz...@hotmail.com

My understanding is that the ntp source command is only applicable to NTP 
requests sources from the host. The host will listen for NTP requests from 
other clients on any viable layer 3 interface on the system.
IOW, it should work and if CUE couldn't recover clock the issue is likely lower 
in the stack.
-Bill
--William Bellblog: http://ucguerrilla.comtwitter: @ucguerrilla



On Apr 4, 2013, at 1:25 PM, ikizoo4 kwon wrote:Hi all,HQ router has ntp source 
loopback 0 already and they ask to reference voice vlan of HQ from CUE.is 
there any way to meet this requirement?
- not be able to ntp sourcing 2 interface, as fas as i know- just point to 
voice vlan from CUE not get ntp synced 
up___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server

2012-12-19 Thread Barrera, Hugo
That worked, thanks.

Regards,
Hugo

From: Jason Aarons [mailto:scubajas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 8:43 PM
To: Barrera, Hugo; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server

Use the workaround in CSCsy13363


From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 6:28 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server

Hi,

I always seem to have issues with getting my Site B and Site C RTR's to 
register NTP to the Site A RTR. My configs are below...

scheduler allocate 2 1000
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 10.10.100.2
!

I have also done:
scheduler allocate 2 1000
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 10.10.100.2 source Loopback0
!

Regards,
Hugo

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server

2012-12-19 Thread Marko Milivojevic
For those who don't have access to Cisco's Bug Toolkit, this was the
proposed solution:

--8--
CSCti46834 Bug Details

NTP sync problem with satellite link
Symptom:

A router may take as long as 15 minutes to synchronize its clock to an
NTP server.

Conditions:

This is a known design problem with NTPv4, which was introduced in IOS
12.4(20)T.

Workaround:

Configure the iburst and burst options, for example:

ntp server 10.0.47.1 burst iburst

with this configured, NTP should synchronize in under 2 minutes.

With the resolution of this bug CSCti46834, a new CLI is introduced:

ntp maxdistance

By increasing the maxdistance value from its default of 1, for example
to 2 or 3, synchronization may be further expedited.
--8--

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP RS)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Barrera, Hugo
hugo.barr...@nexusis.com wrote:
 That worked, thanks.



 Regards,

 Hugo



 From: Jason Aarons [mailto:scubajas...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 8:43 PM
 To: Barrera, Hugo; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server



 Use the workaround in CSCsy13363





 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo
 Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 6:28 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server



 Hi,



 I always seem to have issues with getting my Site B and Site C RTR’s to
 register NTP to the Site A RTR. My configs are below…



 scheduler allocate 2 1000

 ntp source Loopback0

 ntp server 10.10.100.2

 !



 I have also done:

 scheduler allocate 2 1000

 ntp source Loopback0

 ntp server 10.10.100.2 source Loopback0

 !



 Regards,

 Hugo




 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server

2012-12-17 Thread Barrera, Hugo
Hi,

I always seem to have issues with getting my Site B and Site C RTR's to 
register NTP to the Site A RTR. My configs are below...

scheduler allocate 2 1000
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 10.10.100.2
!

I have also done:
scheduler allocate 2 1000
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 10.10.100.2 source Loopback0
!

Regards,
Hugo

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server

2012-12-17 Thread Marko Milivojevic
What do the following say:

- sh ntp assoc
- sh ntp assoc detail
- sh ntp status
- debug ntp events
- debug ntp all

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP RS)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Barrera, Hugo hugo.barr...@nexusis.com wrote:
 Hi,



 I always seem to have issues with getting my Site B and Site C RTR’s to
 register NTP to the Site A RTR. My configs are below…



 scheduler allocate 2 1000

 ntp source Loopback0

 ntp server 10.10.100.2

 !



 I have also done:

 scheduler allocate 2 1000

 ntp source Loopback0

 ntp server 10.10.100.2 source Loopback0

 !



 Regards,

 Hugo




 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server

2012-12-17 Thread Jason Aarons
Use the workaround in CSCsy13363

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 6:28 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server

 

Hi,

 

I always seem to have issues with getting my Site B and Site C RTR's to
register NTP to the Site A RTR. My configs are below.

 

scheduler allocate 2 1000

ntp source Loopback0

ntp server 10.10.100.2

! 

 

I have also done:

scheduler allocate 2 1000

ntp source Loopback0

ntp server 10.10.100.2 source Loopback0 

! 

 

Regards,

Hugo 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP daylight savings

2012-08-16 Thread The Masterplan
Hello,

I have the following scenario where ucm is syncing time from the router
loopback address. On the router I have the following:
ntp server 10.10.100.2
ntp source lo0
clock timezone PST -8
clock summer-time PDT reccuring
Given the above configuration, when I create the date/time group in UCM, do
I have to select the entry with the daylight time?
And if i not configure daylight savings time on the router (no clock
summer-time PDT reccuring) and I choose the entry with daylight time in UCM
is that ok?

Thank you
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-14 Thread Ramy Abdelrahim

No problem at all :-)
Ramy

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:31:42 -0700
From: vinayak_...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
To: ramyoth...@hotmail.com; daqui...@cisco.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; michael.se...@compucom.com

ramy,
i apologize for not understanding the question properly... i overlooked at your 
question..
krishna.
From: Ramy Abdelrahim ramyoth...@hotmail.com
 To: vinayak_...@yahoo.com; daqui...@cisco.com 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; michael.se...@compucom.com 
 Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:08 PM
 Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
   




Krishna,
My question was apart from yours, I was trying to sync one of the gateways 
(Site-B) with its internal clock just for testing to see if it'll provide the 
same result as when synched with external source. Dan advised that this can be 
done with using the ntp master command on Site-B GW, just configure the 2 clock 
commands.
Regards,Ramy

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:50:45 -0700
From: vinayak_...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
To: daqui...@cisco.com; ramyoth...@hotmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; michael.se...@compucom.com

dan  Ramy,
the question here is hq router is the one that
 provides the time to ucm..and therefore without putting the command ntp source 
how can cucm can know it has to synchronize its clock with hq router...i m sure 
that when you providing time from hq router to cucm phones, then you must use 
ntp master as well ntp source to which the time on the hq router binds and 
apparently the cucm can reference the clock from hq router as well...
thank youkrishna
From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) daqui...@cisco.com
 To: Ramy Abdelrahim ramyoth...@hotmail.com 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com;
 michael.se...@compucom.com michael.se...@compucom.com 
 Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 7:33 PM
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
   


 


If it is UCM, then the time on the router is only relevant to the phones when 
in SRST. When registered to the UCM, the phones are getting their time 
information from the UCM, specifically the date time group configured on the 
device pool that contains
 those phones. 



DQ
d...@cisco.com



Sent from my iPhone


On Aug 13, 2012, at 8:26 PM, Ramy Abdelrahim ramyoth...@hotmail.com wrote:







I think in your scenario you're assuming that this is a CME site. Actually, 
this site is a UCM remote site not CME. So, in this case do you think the 2 
clock commands are sufficient?



Regards,
Ramy






From: daqui...@cisco.com

To: ramyoth...@hotmail.com

CC: michael.se...@compucom.com; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:51:17 +



You don't need the ntp master or the ntp source commands. Just the two clock 
commands that you have, the time-zone command under telephony service, and make 
sure you set the type command under the ephone (eg type 7965). Do a create cnf 
under telephony
 service and restart or reset the ephones. 



DQ
d...@cisco.com



Sent from my iPhone


On Aug 13, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Ramy Abdelrahim ramyoth...@hotmail.com wrote:







Dear All,



Regarding the same subject, I tried to sync a gateway with its internal clock 
using ntp master only. The clock was synched but not as what's displayed on the 
IP phones at that site. I realized also that the stratum was higher than 10.



My configuration was as follows:



clock timezone EST -5
clock summer-time EDT recurring
ntp master



I don't know if there's a configuration missing here or not.



Regard,
Ramy







 From: michael.se...@compucom.com

 To: daqui...@cisco.com

 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:32:39 -0400

 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 

 Thanks Dan. I'm not trying to make it work yes it works fine without the 
 command, but instead I'm trying to replicate what Cisco might be looking for 
 on the lab. Frankly I don't know what they are looking for in these types of 
 scenarios but don't want to
 take the chance of losing points because they think the command should be 
there. Just cause it works doesn't mean you will get the points.


 

 Michael Sears

 

 -Original Message-

 From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) [mailto:daqui...@cisco.com] 

 Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 11:27 AM

 To: Sears, Michael (msears)

 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 

 Michael, all,

 

 You do NOT need the NTP master command on a router whenever that router is 
 synchronizing with an external source, even if other devices are to 
 synchronize with that router. Michael - in your config, you can remove the 
 NTP master command and everything will
 synchronize with the HQ router just fine. Ntp master should really only be 
used when

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-13 Thread Ramy Abdelrahim

Dear All,
Regarding the same subject, I tried to sync a gateway with its internal clock 
using ntp master only. The clock was synched but not as what's displayed on the 
IP phones at that site. I realized also that the stratum was higher than 10.
My configuration was as follows:
clock timezone EST -5clock summer-time EDT recurringntp master

I don't know if there's a configuration missing here or not.
Regard,Ramy


 From: michael.se...@compucom.com
 To: daqui...@cisco.com
 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:32:39 -0400
 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
 
 Thanks Dan.  I'm not trying to make it work yes it works fine without the 
 command, but instead I'm trying to replicate what Cisco might be looking for 
 on the lab.  Frankly I don't know what they are looking for in these types of 
 scenarios but don't want to take the chance of losing points because they 
 think the command should be there.  Just cause it works doesn't mean you will 
 get the points. 
 
 Michael Sears
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) [mailto:daqui...@cisco.com] 
 Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 11:27 AM
 To: Sears, Michael (msears)
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
 
 Michael, all,
 
 You do NOT need the NTP master command on a router whenever that router is 
 synchronizing with an external source, even if other devices are to 
 synchronize with that router. Michael - in your config, you can remove the 
 NTP master command and everything will synchronize with the HQ router just 
 fine. Ntp master should really only be used when there is no external clock. 
 
 DQ
 d...@cisco.com
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Aug 5, 2012, at 12:38 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com 
 michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:
 
  The only situation in which I use the ntp master command is in a 
  situation where for example HQ is providing clock for Servers and HQ clock 
  is synchronizing with an external reliable source.
  
  In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and 
  synchronize my HQ router with the PSTN.  HQ loopback provides clock for 
  Servers, Switch, CUE and other branches.  The following is what I use to 
  accomplish this.  Other than this scenario I do not use the ntp master 
  command.
  
  ntp server 10.1.1.1
  ntp source loopback0
  ntp master
  
  Michael Sears
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
  ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
  Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, Issue 14
  
  Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  
  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
  
  You can reach the person managing the list at
 ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
  
  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than 
  Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
  
  
  Today's Topics:
  
1. Re: Switch QOS query (Justin McIntyre)
2. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Bruno Nonogaki)
3. Re: Switch QOS query (Bruno Nonogaki)
4. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Justin McIntyre)
  
  
  --
  
  Message: 1
  Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:10:00 -0400
  From: Justin McIntyre justin.mcint...@blackbox.com
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QOS query
  Message-ID: 0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.com
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  
  So I believe your on the right track with your QOS config but there are a 
  few things that need to be modified.
  
  1.   I see an issue with your requirements.  Have the priority-queue 
  enabled but then also give queue 1 30% bandwidth.  If priority-queue out is 
  enabled then this over-rides the bandwidth command for that queue.  I know 
  you had some other questions as well specifically about how to drop certain 
  traffic if a queue were 80% full.  My suggestion to you would be to review 
  Vik Mahlis QOS blog on the IPEXPERT website.  Go to blog.ipexpert.com and 
  select the voice blog on the left.  Then look for the QOS section.  I think 
  this will clear up most of your questions and get you on your way.
  
  Thanks,
  
  Justin McIntyre
  
  This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are 
  intended for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. 
  Black Box Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for 
  restricted content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the 
  intended

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-13 Thread Krishna
ntp source is the one missing here ...



 From: Ramy Abdelrahim ramyoth...@hotmail.com
To: michael.se...@compucom.com; daqui...@cisco.com 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
 

 
Dear All,

Regarding the same subject, I tried to sync a gateway with its internal clock 
using ntp master only. The clock was synched but not as what's displayed on the 
IP phones at that site. I realized also that the stratum was higher than 10.

My configuration was as follows:

clock timezone EST -5
clock summer-time EDT recurring
ntp master

I don't know if there's a configuration missing here or not.

Regard,
Ramy



 From: michael.se...@compucom.com
 To: daqui...@cisco.com
 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:32:39 -0400
 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
 
 Thanks Dan.  I'm not trying to make it work yes it works fine without the 
 command, but instead I'm trying to replicate what Cisco might be looking for 
 on the lab.  Frankly I don't know what they are looking for in these types of 
 scenarios but don't want to take the chance of losing points because they 
 think the command should be there.  Just cause it works doesn't mean you will 
 get the points. 
 
 Michael Sears
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) [mailto:daqui...@cisco.com] 
 Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 11:27 AM
 To: Sears, Michael (msears)
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
 
 Michael, all,
 
 You do NOT need the NTP master command on a router whenever that router is 
 synchronizing with an external source, even if other devices are to 
 synchronize with that router. Michael - in your config, you can remove the 
 NTP master command and everything will synchronize with the HQ router just 
 fine. Ntp master should really only be used when there is no external clock. 
 
 DQ
 d...@cisco.com
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Aug 5, 2012, at 12:38 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com 
 michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:
 
  The only situation in which I use the ntp master command is in a 
  situation where for example HQ is providing clock for Servers and HQ clock 
  is synchronizing with an external reliable source.
  
  In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and 
  synchronize my HQ router with the PSTN.  HQ loopback provides clock for 
  Servers, Switch, CUE and other branches.  The following is what I use to 
  accomplish this.  Other than this scenario I do not use the ntp master 
  command.
  
  ntp server 10.1.1.1
  ntp source loopback0
  ntp master
  
  Michael Sears
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
  ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
  Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, Issue 14
  
  Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  
  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
  
  You can reach the person managing the list at
 ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
  
  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than 
  Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
  
  
  Today's Topics:
  
1. Re: Switch QOS query (Justin McIntyre)
2. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Bruno Nonogaki)
3. Re: Switch QOS query (Bruno Nonogaki)
4. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Justin McIntyre)
  
  
  --
  
  Message: 1
  Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:10:00 -0400
  From: Justin McIntyre justin.mcint...@blackbox.com
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QOS query
  Message-ID: 0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.com
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  
  So I believe your on the right track with your QOS config but there are a 
  few things that need to be modified.
  
  1.   I see an issue with your requirements.  Have the priority-queue 
  enabled but then also give queue 1 30% bandwidth.  If priority-queue out is 
  enabled then this over-rides the bandwidth command for that queue.  I know 
  you had some other questions as well specifically about how to drop certain 
  traffic if a queue were 80% full.  My suggestion to you would be to review 
  Vik Mahlis QOS blog on the IPEXPERT website.  Go to blog.ipexpert.com and 
  select the voice blog on the left.  Then look for the QOS section.  I think 
  this will clear up most of your questions and get you on your way.
  
  Thanks,
  
  Justin McIntyre

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-13 Thread Dan Quinlan (daquinla)
You don't need the ntp master or the ntp source commands. Just the two clock 
commands that you have, the time-zone command under telephony service, and make 
sure you set the type command under the ephone (eg type 7965). Do a create cnf 
under telephony service and restart or reset the ephones.

DQ
d...@cisco.commailto:d...@cisco.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 13, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Ramy Abdelrahim 
ramyoth...@hotmail.commailto:ramyoth...@hotmail.com wrote:

Dear All,

Regarding the same subject, I tried to sync a gateway with its internal clock 
using ntp master only. The clock was synched but not as what's displayed on the 
IP phones at that site. I realized also that the stratum was higher than 10.

My configuration was as follows:

clock timezone EST -5
clock summer-time EDT recurring
ntp master

I don't know if there's a configuration missing here or not.

Regard,
Ramy


 From: michael.se...@compucom.commailto:michael.se...@compucom.com
 To: daqui...@cisco.commailto:daqui...@cisco.com
 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:32:39 -0400
 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 Thanks Dan. I'm not trying to make it work yes it works fine without the 
 command, but instead I'm trying to replicate what Cisco might be looking for 
 on the lab. Frankly I don't know what they are looking for in these types of 
 scenarios but don't want to take the chance of losing points because they 
 think the command should be there. Just cause it works doesn't mean you will 
 get the points.

 Michael Sears

 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) [mailto:daqui...@cisco.com]
 Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 11:27 AM
 To: Sears, Michael (msears)
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 Michael, all,

 You do NOT need the NTP master command on a router whenever that router is 
 synchronizing with an external source, even if other devices are to 
 synchronize with that router. Michael - in your config, you can remove the 
 NTP master command and everything will synchronize with the HQ router just 
 fine. Ntp master should really only be used when there is no external clock.

 DQ
 d...@cisco.commailto:d...@cisco.com
! gt;
 Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 5, 2012, at 12:38 PM, 
 michael.se...@compucom.commailto:michael.se...@compucom.com 
 michael.se...@compucom.commailto:michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

  The only situation in which I use the ntp master command is in a 
  situation where for example HQ is providing clock for Servers and HQ clock 
  is synchronizing with an external reliable source.
 
  In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and 
  synchronize my HQ router with the PSTN. HQ loopback provides clock for 
  Servers, Switch, CUE and other branches. The following is what I use to 
  accomplish this. Other than this scenario I do not use the ntp master 
  command.
 
  ntp server 10.1.1.1
  ntp source loopback0
  ntp master
 
  Michael Sears
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: 
  ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
  ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
  Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, Issue 14
 
  Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
  ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
  http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
  ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 
  You can reach the person managing the list at
  ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
 
  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than 
  Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
 
 
  Today's Topics:
 
  1. Re: Switch QOS query (Justin McIntyre)
 !  2.. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Bruno Nonogaki)
  3. Re: Switch QOS query (Bruno Nonogaki)
  4. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Justin McIntyre)
 
 
  --
 
  Message: 1
  Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:10:00 -0400
  From: Justin McIntyre 
  justin.mcint...@blackbox.commailto:justin.mcint...@blackbox.com
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
  ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QOS query
  Message-ID: 
  0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.commailto:0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.com
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
  So I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-13 Thread Ramy Abdelrahim

I think in your scenario you're assuming that this is a CME site. Actually, 
this site is a UCM remote site not CME. So, in this case do you think the 2 
clock commands are sufficient?
Regards,Ramy

From: daqui...@cisco.com
To: ramyoth...@hotmail.com
CC: michael.se...@compucom.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:51:17 +






You don't need the ntp master or the ntp source commands. Just the two clock 
commands that you have, the time-zone command under telephony service, and make 
sure you set the type command under the ephone (eg type 7965). Do a create cnf 
under telephony
 service and restart or reset the ephones. 



DQ
d...@cisco.com



Sent from my iPhone


On Aug 13, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Ramy Abdelrahim ramyoth...@hotmail.com wrote:







Dear All,



Regarding the same subject, I tried to sync a gateway with its internal clock 
using ntp master only. The clock was synched but not as what's displayed on the 
IP phones at that site. I realized also that the stratum was higher than 10.



My configuration was as follows:



clock timezone EST -5
clock summer-time EDT recurring
ntp master



I don't know if there's a configuration missing here or not.



Regard,
Ramy







 From: michael.se...@compucom.com

 To: daqui...@cisco.com

 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:32:39 -0400

 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 

 Thanks Dan. I'm not trying to make it work yes it works fine without the 
 command, but instead I'm trying to replicate what Cisco might be looking for 
 on the lab. Frankly I don't know what they are looking for in these types of 
 scenarios but don't want to
 take the chance of losing points because they think the command should be 
there. Just cause it works doesn't mean you will get the points.


 

 Michael Sears

 

 -Original Message-

 From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) [mailto:daqui...@cisco.com] 

 Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 11:27 AM

 To: Sears, Michael (msears)

 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 

 Michael, all,

 

 You do NOT need the NTP master command on a router whenever that router is 
 synchronizing with an external source, even if other devices are to 
 synchronize with that router. Michael - in your config, you can remove the 
 NTP master command and everything will
 synchronize with the HQ router just fine. Ntp master should really only be 
used when there is no external clock.


 

 DQ

 d...@cisco.com

! gt; 

 Sent from my iPhone

 

 On Aug 5, 2012, at 12:38 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com 
 michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

 

  The only situation in which I use the ntp master command is in a 
  situation where for example HQ is providing clock for Servers and HQ clock 
  is synchronizing with an external reliable source.

  

  In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and 
  synchronize my HQ router with the PSTN. HQ loopback provides clock for 
  Servers, Switch, CUE and other branches. The following is what I use to 
  accomplish this. Other than this scenario I
 do not use the ntp master command.

  

  ntp server 10.1.1.1

  ntp source loopback0

  ntp master

  

  Michael Sears

  

  

  -Original Message-

  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com


  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 

  ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

  Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM

  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, Issue 14

  

  Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to

  ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  

  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

  http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice

  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

  ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

  

  You can reach the person managing the list at

  ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

  

  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than 
  Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...

  

  

  Today's Topics:

  

  1. Re: Switch QOS query (Justin McIntyre)

 !  2.. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Bruno Nonogaki)

  3. Re: Switch QOS query (Bruno Nonogaki)

  4. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Justin McIntyre)

  

  

  --

  

  Message: 1

  Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:10:00 -0400

  From: Justin McIntyre justin.mcint...@blackbox.com

  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QOS query

  Message-ID: 0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.com

  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

  

  So I believe your on the right track with your QOS config but there are a 
  few things that need to be modified.

  

  1. I see an issue with your

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-13 Thread Dan Quinlan (daquinla)
If it is UCM, then the time on the router is only relevant to the phones when 
in SRST. When registered to the UCM, the phones are getting their time 
information from the UCM, specifically the date time group configured on the 
device pool that contains those phones.

DQ
d...@cisco.commailto:d...@cisco.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 13, 2012, at 8:26 PM, Ramy Abdelrahim 
ramyoth...@hotmail.commailto:ramyoth...@hotmail.com wrote:

I think in your scenario you're assuming that this is a CME site. Actually, 
this site is a UCM remote site not CME. So, in this case do you think the 2 
clock commands are sufficient?

Regards,
Ramy


From: daqui...@cisco.commailto:daqui...@cisco.com
To: ramyoth...@hotmail.commailto:ramyoth...@hotmail.com
CC: michael.se...@compucom.commailto:michael.se...@compucom.com; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:51:17 +

You don't need the ntp master or the ntp source commands. Just the two clock 
commands that you have, the time-zone command under telephony service, and make 
sure you set the type command under the ephone (eg type 7965). Do a create cnf 
under telephony service and restart or reset the ephones.

DQ
d...@cisco.commailto:d...@cisco.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 13, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Ramy Abdelrahim 
ramyoth...@hotmail.commailto:ramyoth...@hotmail.com wrote:

Dear All,

Regarding the same subject, I tried to sync a gateway with its internal clock 
using ntp master only. The clock was synched but not as what's displayed on the 
IP phones at that site. I realized also that the stratum was higher than 10.

My configuration was as follows:

clock timezone EST -5
clock summer-time EDT recurring
ntp master

I don't know if there's a configuration missing here or not.

Regard,
Ramy


 From: michael.se...@compucom.commailto:michael.se...@compucom.com
 To: daqui...@cisco.commailto:daqui...@cisco.com
 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:32:39 -0400
 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 Thanks Dan. I'm not trying to make it work yes it works fine without the 
 command, but instead I'm trying to replicate what Cisco might be looking for 
 on the lab. Frankly I don't know what they are looking for in these types of 
 scenarios but don't want to take the chance of losing points because they 
 think the command should be there. Just cause it works doesn't mean you will 
 get the points.

 Michael Sears

 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) [mailto:daqui...@cisco.com]
 Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 11:27 AM
 To: Sears, Michael (msears)
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 Michael, all,

 You do NOT need the NTP master command on a router whenever that router is 
 synchronizing with an external source, even if other devices are to 
 synchronize with that router. Michael - in your config, you can remove the 
 NTP master command and everything will synchronize with the HQ router just 
 fine. Ntp master should really only be used when there is no external clock.

 DQ
 d...@cisco.commailto:d...@cisco.com
! gt;
 Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 5, 2012, at 12:38 PM, 
 michael.se...@compucom.commailto:michael.se...@compucom.com 
 michael.se...@compucom.commailto:michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

  The only situation in which I use the ntp master command is in a 
  situation where for example HQ is providing clock for Servers and HQ clock 
  is synchronizing with an external reliable source.
 
  In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and 
  synchronize my HQ router with the PSTN. HQ loopback provides clock for 
  Servers, Switch, CUE and other branches. The following is what I use to 
  accomplish this. Other than this scenario I do not use the ntp master 
  command.
 
  ntp server 10.1.1.1
  ntp source loopback0
  ntp master
 
  Michael Sears
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: 
  ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
  ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
  Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, Issue 14
 
  Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
  ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
  http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
  ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 
  You can reach the person managing the list at
  ccie_voice

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-06 Thread Jason Murray
Michael, Dan is spot on

 Take a look at this older thread which Vik give a good explanation. 

 http://www.onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2011-June/075080.html

 Just as Dan has stated DO NOT use the ntp master command if you are 
sychronized with an external ntp server (i.e. if you configure ntp server 
X.X.X.X within the router dont configure ntp master). In my studies with 
ipexpert and cisco 360 in all their solutions they never use ntp master if they 
sync the router to an external source. 


 Jason
- Original Message -
From: michael.se...@compucom.com
Sent: 08/05/12 12:32 PM
To: daqui...@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

 Thanks Dan. I'm not trying to make it work yes it works fine without the 
command, but instead I'm trying to replicate what Cisco might be looking for on 
the lab. Frankly I don't know what they are looking for in these types of 
scenarios but don't want to take the chance of losing points because they think 
the command should be there. Just cause it works doesn't mean you will get the 
points. Michael Sears -Original Message- From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) 
[mailto:daqui...@cisco.com] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 11:27 AM To: Sears, 
Michael (msears) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | 
CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary Michael, all, You do NOT need the NTP 
master command on a router whenever that router is synchronizing with an 
external source, even if other devices are to synchronize with that router. 
Michael - in your config, you can remove the NTP master command and everything 
will synchronize with the HQ router just fine. Ntp master should really only be 
used when there is no external clock. DQ d...@cisco.com Sent from my iPhone On 
Aug 5, 2012, at 12:38 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com 
michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:  The only situation in which I use the 
ntp master command is in a situation where for example HQ is providing clock 
for Servers and HQ clock is synchronizing with an external reliable source.   
In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and synchronize 
my HQ router with the PSTN. HQ loopback provides clock for Servers, Switch, CUE 
and other branches. The following is what I use to accomplish this. Other than 
this scenario I do not use the ntp master command.   ntp server 10.1.1.1  
ntp source loopback0  ntp master   Michael Sears-Original 
Message-  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com  
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of  
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com  Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM 
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com  Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, 
Issue 14   Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to  
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com   To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World 
Wide Web, visit  http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice  or, 
via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to  
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com   You can reach the person managing 
the list at  ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com   When replying, please 
edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice 
digest...Today's Topics:   1. Re: Switch QOS query (Justin McIntyre) 
 2. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Bruno Nonogaki)  3. Re: Switch QOS query 
(Bruno Nonogaki)  4. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Justin McIntyre)
--   
Message: 1  Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:10:00 -0400  From: Justin McIntyre 
justin.mcint...@blackbox.com  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QOS 
query  Message-ID: 0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.com  
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii   So I believe your on the right 
track with your QOS config but there are a few things that need to be modified. 
  1. I see an issue with your requirements. Have the priority-queue enabled 
but then also give queue 1 30% bandwidth. If priority-queue out is enabled then 
this over-rides the bandwidth command for that queue. I know you had some other 
questions as well specifically about how to drop certain traffic if a queue 
were 80% full. My suggestion to you would be to review Vik Mahlis QOS blog on 
the IPEXPERT website. Go to blog.ipexpert.com and select the voice blog on the 
left. Then look for the QOS section. I think this will clear up most of your 
questions and get you on your way.   Thanks,   Justin McIntyre   This 
email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for 
the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-05 Thread Bruno Nonogaki
Hello Krishna,

Yes, you are right. ntp master is not required.
If you do ntp master, it may synchronize with its internal clock.

It is a big mistake a lot of people do, including me before the OWLE
Bootcamp, which I really recommend.

Regards,

Bruno


On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com wrote:

 hi folks,

 i see some guys posts on ntp master command on the hq router ... i was
 wondering why one would  be needing ntp master command when it is already
 being synchronized with external ntp server ntp master will infact mess
 up the time if not configured correctly since ntp master takes the stratum
 from the hardware(device) and be careful when putting the command ntp
 master .. if it is required then it is advised to keep the stratum number
 high compared to the extrenal ntp server... please correct me guys if i m
 wrong

 precisely, i felt that ntp master command is not required if that device
 is synchronized with external ntp server.. any comments on my advice is
 much appreciated...


 thank you
 krishna.

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-05 Thread Justin McIntyre
I believe you are correct Krishna.  My thoughts on it are this.  I think the 
NTP MASTER command is needed else it would not be part of the CLI.  However, we 
must truly understand what the command does before we can decide if it is to be 
used or not.  If a router is configured to sync to an external time source then 
if NTP master is used the stratum that is configured must be accounted for.  At 
some point down the chain of NTP syncs the stratum will eventually reach a 
number high enough that the device on the end of the chain will prefer its 
internal clock as the stratum is better.  So if the router is not synchronized 
to an external source but must act as a NTP source then this is when we want to 
use the NTP master command.  Every situation/requirement is different and we 
need to ultimately understand the NTP Master command   as to whether or not we 
need to use the command or not.

Thanks,

Justin McIntyre

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-05 Thread Michael.Sears
The only situation in which I use the ntp master command is in a situation 
where for example HQ is providing clock for Servers and HQ clock is 
synchronizing with an external reliable source.

In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and synchronize 
my HQ router with the PSTN.  HQ loopback provides clock for Servers, Switch, 
CUE and other branches.  The following is what I use to accomplish this.  Other 
than this scenario I do not use the ntp master command.

ntp server 10.1.1.1
ntp source loopback0
ntp master 

Michael Sears


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, Issue 14

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Switch QOS query (Justin McIntyre)
   2. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Bruno Nonogaki)
   3. Re: Switch QOS query (Bruno Nonogaki)
   4. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Justin McIntyre)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:10:00 -0400
From: Justin McIntyre justin.mcint...@blackbox.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QOS query
Message-ID: 0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

So I believe your on the right track with your QOS config but there are a few 
things that need to be modified.

1.   I see an issue with your requirements.  Have the priority-queue enabled 
but then also give queue 1 30% bandwidth.  If priority-queue out is enabled 
then this over-rides the bandwidth command for that queue.  I know you had some 
other questions as well specifically about how to drop certain traffic if a 
queue were 80% full.  My suggestion to you would be to review Vik Mahlis QOS 
blog on the IPEXPERT website.  Go to blog.ipexpert.com and select the voice 
blog on the left.  Then look for the QOS section.  I think this will clear up 
most of your questions and get you on your way.

Thanks,

Justin McIntyre

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.


--

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:14:44 -0300
From: Bruno Nonogaki brun...@gmail.com
To: Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com
Cc: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
Message-ID:
CAP_RLdVVgHfN=fGytf6w7K5n5-nS6g3JnRiZfM5=tgsxozp...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hello Krishna,

Yes, you are right. ntp master is not required.
If you do ntp master, it may synchronize with its internal clock.

It is a big mistake a lot of people do, including me before the OWLE Bootcamp, 
which I really recommend.

Regards,

Bruno


On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com wrote:

 hi folks,

 i see some guys posts on ntp master command on the hq router ... i was 
 wondering why one would  be needing ntp master command when it is 
 already being synchronized with external ntp server ntp master 
 will infact mess up the time if not configured correctly since ntp 
 master takes the stratum from the hardware(device) and be careful when 
 putting the command ntp master .. if it is required then it is advised 
 to keep the stratum number high compared to the extrenal ntp server... 
 please correct me guys if i m wrong

 precisely, i felt that ntp master command is not required if that 
 device is synchronized with external ntp server.. any comments on my 
 advice is much appreciated...


 thank you
 krishna.

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

-- next part --
An HTML

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-05 Thread Dan Quinlan (daquinla)
Michael, all,

You do NOT need the NTP master command on a router whenever that router is 
synchronizing with an external source, even if other devices are to synchronize 
with that router. Michael - in your config, you can remove the NTP master 
command and everything will synchronize with the HQ router just fine. Ntp 
master should really only be used when there is no external clock. 

DQ
d...@cisco.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 5, 2012, at 12:38 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com 
michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

 The only situation in which I use the ntp master command is in a situation 
 where for example HQ is providing clock for Servers and HQ clock is 
 synchronizing with an external reliable source.
 
 In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and synchronize 
 my HQ router with the PSTN.  HQ loopback provides clock for Servers, Switch, 
 CUE and other branches.  The following is what I use to accomplish this.  
 Other than this scenario I do not use the ntp master command.
 
 ntp server 10.1.1.1
 ntp source loopback0
 ntp master 
 
 Michael Sears
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
 ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, Issue 14
 
 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: 
 Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
   1. Re: Switch QOS query (Justin McIntyre)
   2. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Bruno Nonogaki)
   3. Re: Switch QOS query (Bruno Nonogaki)
   4. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Justin McIntyre)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:10:00 -0400
 From: Justin McIntyre justin.mcint...@blackbox.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QOS query
 Message-ID: 0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 So I believe your on the right track with your QOS config but there are a few 
 things that need to be modified.
 
 1.   I see an issue with your requirements.  Have the priority-queue enabled 
 but then also give queue 1 30% bandwidth.  If priority-queue out is enabled 
 then this over-rides the bandwidth command for that queue.  I know you had 
 some other questions as well specifically about how to drop certain traffic 
 if a queue were 80% full.  My suggestion to you would be to review Vik Mahlis 
 QOS blog on the IPEXPERT website.  Go to blog.ipexpert.com and select the 
 voice blog on the left.  Then look for the QOS section.  I think this will 
 clear up most of your questions and get you on your way.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Justin McIntyre
 
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are 
 intended for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black 
 Box Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
 content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
 recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
 forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
 email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:14:44 -0300
 From: Bruno Nonogaki brun...@gmail.com
 To: Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com
 Cc: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
 Message-ID:
CAP_RLdVVgHfN=fGytf6w7K5n5-nS6g3JnRiZfM5=tgsxozp...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 Hello Krishna,
 
 Yes, you are right. ntp master is not required.
 If you do ntp master, it may synchronize with its internal clock.
 
 It is a big mistake a lot of people do, including me before the OWLE 
 Bootcamp, which I really recommend.
 
 Regards,
 
 Bruno
 
 
 On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 hi folks,
 
 i see some guys posts on ntp master command on the hq router ... i was 
 wondering why one would  be needing ntp master command when it is 
 already being synchronized with external ntp server ntp master 
 will infact mess up the time if not configured correctly since ntp 
 master takes the stratum from the hardware(device) and be careful when 
 putting the command ntp master .. if it is required

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-05 Thread Michael.Sears
Thanks Dan.  I'm not trying to make it work yes it works fine without the 
command, but instead I'm trying to replicate what Cisco might be looking for on 
the lab.  Frankly I don't know what they are looking for in these types of 
scenarios but don't want to take the chance of losing points because they think 
the command should be there.  Just cause it works doesn't mean you will get the 
points. 

Michael Sears

-Original Message-
From: Dan Quinlan (daquinla) [mailto:daqui...@cisco.com] 
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 11:27 AM
To: Sears, Michael (msears)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

Michael, all,

You do NOT need the NTP master command on a router whenever that router is 
synchronizing with an external source, even if other devices are to synchronize 
with that router. Michael - in your config, you can remove the NTP master 
command and everything will synchronize with the HQ router just fine. Ntp 
master should really only be used when there is no external clock. 

DQ
d...@cisco.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 5, 2012, at 12:38 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com 
michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

 The only situation in which I use the ntp master command is in a situation 
 where for example HQ is providing clock for Servers and HQ clock is 
 synchronizing with an external reliable source.
 
 In my lab I synchronize my PSTN with the Boulder Atomic Clock and synchronize 
 my HQ router with the PSTN.  HQ loopback provides clock for Servers, Switch, 
 CUE and other branches.  The following is what I use to accomplish this.  
 Other than this scenario I do not use the ntp master command.
 
 ntp server 10.1.1.1
 ntp source loopback0
 ntp master
 
 Michael Sears
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
 ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:00 AM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 78, Issue 14
 
 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: 
 Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
   1. Re: Switch QOS query (Justin McIntyre)
   2. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Bruno Nonogaki)
   3. Re: Switch QOS query (Bruno Nonogaki)
   4. Re: ntp master- is it necessary (Justin McIntyre)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:10:00 -0400
 From: Justin McIntyre justin.mcint...@blackbox.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QOS query
 Message-ID: 0aed4c84-05d7-4f60-b91f-eeca67495...@blackbox.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 So I believe your on the right track with your QOS config but there are a few 
 things that need to be modified.
 
 1.   I see an issue with your requirements.  Have the priority-queue enabled 
 but then also give queue 1 30% bandwidth.  If priority-queue out is enabled 
 then this over-rides the bandwidth command for that queue.  I know you had 
 some other questions as well specifically about how to drop certain traffic 
 if a queue were 80% full.  My suggestion to you would be to review Vik Mahlis 
 QOS blog on the IPEXPERT website.  Go to blog.ipexpert.com and select the 
 voice blog on the left.  Then look for the QOS section.  I think this will 
 clear up most of your questions and get you on your way.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Justin McIntyre
 
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are 
 intended for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black 
 Box Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
 content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
 recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
 forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
 email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:14:44 -0300
 From: Bruno Nonogaki brun...@gmail.com
 To: Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com
 Cc: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary
 Message-ID:

 CAP_RLdVVgHfN=fGytf6w7K5n5-nS6g3JnRiZfM5=tgsxozp...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 Hello Krishna,
 
 Yes, you are right. ntp master is not required.
 If you do ntp master, it may

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp master- is it necessary

2012-08-04 Thread Krishna
hi folks,

i see some guys posts on ntp master command on the hq router ... i was 
wondering why one would  be needing ntp master command when it is already being 
synchronized with external ntp server ntp master will infact mess up the 
time if not configured correctly since ntp master takes the stratum from the 
hardware(device) and be careful when putting the command ntp master .. if it is 
required then it is advised to keep the stratum number high compared to the 
extrenal ntp server... please correct me guys if i m wrong 

precisely, i felt that ntp master command is not required if that device is 
synchronized with external ntp server.. any comments on my advice is much 
appreciated...


thank you
krishna.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma

2012-06-08 Thread Mann Chaddha
Hi Experts

I am due for my next Lab attempt in 5 days time. I so far have never been
able to get marks for NTP section.

So I ask this question to the forum that if someone has ever scored 100% in
the Infra Section (without breaking the NDA of course) , can they lend some
light on this innocuous looking command, ntp master.

Here are some finding from my POD: [10.10.100.1 = PSTN RTR  10.10.110.1=HQ
RTR]
1. With NTP Master Command

R1:
ntp source Loopback0
ntp master 10
ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
!
clock timezone PST -8
clock summer-time PDT recurring

R2:
ntp server 10.10.110.1

Show commands:
R1:
HQ-R1#sh ntp status
Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D37C1C18.AAB00668 (23:37:12.666 PDT Thu Jun 7 2012)
clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03145
s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 384 sec ago.
HQ-R1#
HQ-R1#
HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
HQ-R1#sh ntp associations

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
disp
x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   9 16 16   377  0.000   0.000
0.240
x~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 50 64   377  0.000 13194.1
3.293
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured


R2:
BR1-R2#sh ntp status
Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is . (16:00:00.000 PST Wed Dec 31 1899)
clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is 0.03885
s/s
system poll interval is 64, never updated.
BR1-R2#
BR1-R2#sh ntp ass

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
disp
 ~10.10.110.173.78.73.84 16 55 64   300  0.000 1325166
944.35
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured

CUCM:
admin:utils ntp status
ntpd (pid 6322) is running...

 remote   refid  st t when poll reach   delay   offset
jitter
==
*127.127.1.0 LOCAL(0)10 l   63   64  3770.0000.000
0.001
 10.10.110.1.INIT.  16 u   64  128  3701.897   -2.990
1087693


synchronised to local net at stratum 11
   time correct to within 12 ms
   polling server every 512 s

Current time in UTC is : Fri Jun  8 06:22:22 UTC 2012
Current time in America/Los_Angeles is : Thu Jun  7 23:22:22 PDT 2012



--

Scenario 2: Without NTP Master Command.
--
R1:
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
!
clock timezone PST -8
clock summer-time PDT recurring

R2:
BR1-R2#r | s ntp
ntp server 10.10.110.1

Show Commands:

HQ-R1#sh ntp status
Clock is synchronized, stratum 2, reference is 10.10.100.1
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D37C21AB.D80D6753 (00:00:59.843 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
clock offset is -0.0078 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03182
s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 264 sec ago.
HQ-R1#

HQ-R1#sh ntp ass

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
disp
*~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 11 64   377  0.000  -7.866
2.813
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured

HQ-R1#sh ntp ass d
10.10.100.1 configured, our_master, sane, valid, stratum 1
ref ID .LOCL., time D37C229E.73B36D17 (00:05:02.451 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 64, peer poll intvl 64
root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.47, reach 377, sync dist 0.00
delay 0.00 msec, offset -7.8662 msec, dispersion 2.81
precision 2**24, version 4
org time D37C22AE.D47DF91B (00:05:18.830 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
rec time D37C22AE.D7653258 (00:05:18.841 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
xmt time D37C22AE.D6E2248F (00:05:18.839 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
filtdelay = 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
filtoffset =   -0.01   -0.00   -0.00   -0.00   -0.00   -0.00   -0.00   -0.00
filterror = 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
minpoll = 6, maxpoll = 10


BR1-R2#sh ntp s
Clock is synchronized, stratum 3, reference is 10.10.110.1
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D37C2310.A8751D42 (00:06:56.658 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
clock offset is 0.0034 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma

2012-06-08 Thread Dan Quinlan
You don¹t want to use both an ³ntp master² (my clock is the master) and an
ntp server (this is the ntp server I want to sync with) command together.
Cisco IOS will respond to ntp requests if a) it is the ntp master (ntp
master command) or b) it is synced to an ntp source (ntp server command).
So, for example, let¹s say that you want to sync R1 to a backbone ntp
server, and have R2 and R3 sync to R1.  You would do:

R1:
ntp server backbone ntp server¹s ip address ! You¹re telling R1 to use
ntp to sync to the backbone server
ntp source interface name   ! Optional - You¹re telling R1 to use a
specific interface for sourcing all of its NTP traffic

R2  R3:
ntp server R1¹s ip address ­ use the address of the interface you set
in the ³ntp source² command on R1 if you set one

In the above scenario, R1 will respond to ntp requests, R2 will respond to
ntp requests, and R3 will respond to ntp requests.  No need for an ³ntp
master² command.

Scenario 2:  You want R1 to provide ntp to R2 and R3, but are not using
another ntp server:

R1:
ntp master stratum number ! You¹re telling R1 to respond to NTP
requests and say he¹s a certain stratum clock.
ntp source interface name  ! Optional - You¹re telling R1 to use a
specific interface for sourcing all of its NTP traffic
   
R2  R3:
ntp server R1¹s ip address ­ use the address of the interface you set
in the ³ntp source² command on R1 if you set one


HTH,

DQ

 




On 6/8/12 1:19 PM, Mann Chaddha mann.chad...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Experts
 
 I am due for my next Lab attempt in 5 days time. I so far have never been able
 to get marks for NTP section.
 
 So I ask this question to the forum that if someone has ever scored 100% in
 the Infra Section (without breaking the NDA of course) , can they lend some
 light on this innocuous looking command, ntp master.
 
 Here are some finding from my POD: [10.10.100.1 = PSTN RTR  10.10.110.1=HQ
 RTR]
 1. With NTP Master Command
 
 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master 10 
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring
 
 R2:
 ntp server 10.10.110.1
 
 Show commands:
 R1:
 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C1C18.AAB00668 (23:37:12.666 PDT Thu Jun 7 2012)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03145 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 384 sec ago.
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
 HQ-R1#sh ntp associations
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
 x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   9 16 16   377  0.000   0.000  0.240
 x~10.10.100.1    .LOCL.   1 50 64   377  0.000 13194.1  3.293
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 
 R2:
 BR1-R2#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is . (16:00:00.000 PST Wed Dec 31 1899)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is 0.03885 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, never updated.
 BR1-R2#
 BR1-R2#sh ntp ass
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
  ~10.10.110.1    73.78.73.84 16 55 64   300  0.000 1325166 944.35
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 CUCM:
 admin:utils ntp status
 ntpd (pid 6322) is running...
 
  remote   refid  st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
 ==
 *127.127.1.0 LOCAL(0)    10 l   63   64  377    0.000    0.000   0.001
  10.10.110.1    .INIT.  16 u   64  128  370    1.897   -2.990 1087693
 
 
 synchronised to local net at stratum 11
    time correct to within 12 ms
    polling server every 512 s
 
 Current time in UTC is : Fri Jun  8 06:22:22 UTC 2012
 Current time in America/Los_Angeles is : Thu Jun  7 23:22:22 PDT 2012
 
 
 
 --
 
 Scenario 2: Without NTP Master Command.
 --
 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring
 
 R2:
 BR1-R2#r | s ntp
 ntp server 10.10.110.1
 
 Show Commands:
 
 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is synchronized, stratum 2, reference is 10.10.100.1
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C21AB.D80D6753 (00:00:59.843 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma

2012-06-08 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
I've never taken the lab.  I can give you my opinion.  I suspect Cisco may vary 
the Stratum of their NTP server on purpose by day/week, etc. Throwing students 
who think they know the answer off.  So the answer would depend on what Stratum 
you getting.

Generally I don't think you won't need the master command unless they are 
giving you a bad stratum =10 which CallManager won't like.

Verify your hardware is close to current time via show clock.
Show ntp association detail  --is your master sane or insane, if 
not why?

sc#show ntp assoc detail
172.10.64.254 configured, our_master, sane, valid, stratum 7
ref ID 172.100.64.10 , time D37CCC06.0A26BD47 (03:07:50.039 HKT Sat Jun 9 2012)
our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 64, peer poll intvl 64
root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 37.17, reach 377, sync dist 0.04

debug ntp to your buffer in background

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mann Chaddha
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 1:19 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma



Hi Experts

I am due for my next Lab attempt in 5 days time. I so far have never been able 
to get marks for NTP section.

So I ask this question to the forum that if someone has ever scored 100% in the 
Infra Section (without breaking the NDA of course) , can they lend some light 
on this innocuous looking command, ntp master.

Here are some finding from my POD: [10.10.100.1 = PSTN RTR  10.10.110.1=HQ RTR]
1. With NTP Master Command

R1:
ntp source Loopback0
ntp master 10
ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
!
clock timezone PST -8
clock summer-time PDT recurring

R2:
ntp server 10.10.110.1

Show commands:
R1:
HQ-R1#sh ntp status
Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D37C1C18.AAB00668 (23:37:12.666 PDT Thu Jun 7 2012)
clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03145 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 384 sec ago.
HQ-R1#
HQ-R1#
HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
HQ-R1#sh ntp associations

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   9 16 16   377  0.000   0.000  0.240
x~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 50 64   377  0.000 13194.1  3.293
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured


R2:
BR1-R2#sh ntp status
Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is . (16:00:00.000 PST Wed Dec 31 1899)
clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is 0.03885 s/s
system poll interval is 64, never updated.
BR1-R2#
BR1-R2#sh ntp ass

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
 ~10.10.110.173.78.73.84 16 55 64   300  0.000 1325166 944.35
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured

CUCM:
admin:utils ntp status
ntpd (pid 6322) is running...

 remote   refid  st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==
*127.127.1.0 LOCAL(0)10 l   63   64  3770.0000.000   0.001
 10.10.110.1.INIT.  16 u   64  128  3701.897   -2.990 1087693


synchronised to local net at stratum 11
   time correct to within 12 ms
   polling server every 512 s

Current time in UTC is : Fri Jun  8 06:22:22 UTC 2012
Current time in America/Los_Angeles is : Thu Jun  7 23:22:22 PDT 2012



--

Scenario 2: Without NTP Master Command.
--
R1:
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
!
clock timezone PST -8
clock summer-time PDT recurring

R2:
BR1-R2#r | s ntp
ntp server 10.10.110.1

Show Commands:

HQ-R1#sh ntp status
Clock is synchronized, stratum 2, reference is 10.10.100.1
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D37C21AB.D80D6753 (00:00:59.843 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
clock offset is -0.0078 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03182 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 264 sec ago.
HQ-R1#

HQ-R1#sh ntp ass

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
*~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 11 64   377  0.000  -7.866  2.813
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma

2012-06-08 Thread Jason Murray
Do not use ntp master on any of your routers. The only command that is needed 
is the ntp server command. Even if you want one of your routers to be the NTP 
server you dont need the ntp master command. 

 Jason
- Original Message -
From: Mann Chaddha
Sent: 06/08/12 12:19 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma

 Hi Experts

 I am due for my next Lab attempt in 5 days time. I so far have never been able 
to get marks for NTP section.

 So I ask this question to the forum that if someone has ever scored 100% in 
the Infra Section (without breaking the NDA of course) , can they lend some 
light on this innocuous looking command, ntp master.

 Here are some finding from my POD: [10.10.100.1 = PSTN RTR  10.10.110.1=HQ 
RTR]
 1. With NTP Master Command

 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master 10
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring

 R2:
 ntp server 10.10.110.1

 Show commands:
 R1:
 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C1C18.AAB00668 (23:37:12.666 PDT Thu Jun 7 2012)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03145 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 384 sec ago.
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
 HQ-R1#sh ntp associations

 address ref clock st when poll reach delay offset disp
 x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL. 9 16 16 377 0.000 0.000 0.240
 x~10.10.100.1 .LOCL. 1 50 64 377 0.000 13194.1 3.293
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured


 R2:
 BR1-R2#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is . (16:00:00.000 PST Wed Dec 31 1899)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is 0.03885 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, never updated.
 BR1-R2#
 BR1-R2#sh ntp ass

 address ref clock st when poll reach delay offset disp
 ~10.10.110.1 73.78.73.84 16 55 64 300 0.000 1325166 944.35
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured

 CUCM:
 admin:utils ntp status
 ntpd (pid 6322) is running...

 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
 ==
 *127.127.1.0 LOCAL(0) 10 l 63 64 377 0.000 0.000 0.001
 10.10.110.1 .INIT. 16 u 64 128 370 1.897 -2.990 1087693


 synchronised to local net at stratum 11
 time correct to within 12 ms
 polling server every 512 s

 Current time in UTC is : Fri Jun 8 06:22:22 UTC 2012
 Current time in America/Los_Angeles is : Thu Jun 7 23:22:22 PDT 2012



 --

 Scenario 2: Without NTP Master Command.
 --
 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring

 R2:
 BR1-R2#r | s ntp
 ntp server 10.10.110.1

 Show Commands:

 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is synchronized, stratum 2, reference is 10.10.100.1
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C21AB.D80D6753 (00:00:59.843 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 clock offset is -0.0078 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03182 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 264 sec ago.
 HQ-R1#

 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass

 address ref clock st when poll reach delay offset disp
 *~10.10.100.1 .LOCL. 1 11 64 377 0.000 -7.866 2.813
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured

 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass d
 10.10.100.1 configured, our_master, sane, valid, stratum 1
 ref ID .LOCL., time D37C229E.73B36D17 (00:05:02.451 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 64, peer poll intvl 64
 root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.47, reach 377, sync dist 0.00
 delay 0.00 msec, offset -7.8662 msec, dispersion 2.81
 precision 2**24, version 4
 org time D37C22AE.D47DF91B (00:05:18.830 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 rec time D37C22AE.D7653258 (00:05:18.841 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 xmt time D37C22AE.D6E2248F (00:05:18.839 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 filtdelay = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 filtoffset = -0.01 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00
 filterror = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
 minpoll = 6, maxpoll = 10


 BR1-R2#sh ntp s
 Clock is synchronized, stratum 3, reference is 10.10.110.1
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma

2012-06-08 Thread Tapan Gautam (tgautam)
Based on my testing in the home lab, I suggest to not use 'ntp master'
and ntp server at the same time. To sync to an external source, all you
need is 'ntp server' command. Also, I could not find a cli command to
setup ntp in CUCM, only way to do it is via GUI.

Good luck!!!

 

Hth,

Tapan

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mann
Chaddha
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:19 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma

 

Hi Experts

I am due for my next Lab attempt in 5 days time. I so far have never
been able to get marks for NTP section. 

So I ask this question to the forum that if someone has ever scored 100%
in the Infra Section (without breaking the NDA of course) , can they
lend some light on this innocuous looking command, ntp master.

Here are some finding from my POD: [10.10.100.1 = PSTN RTR 
10.10.110.1=HQ RTR]
1. With NTP Master Command

R1:
ntp source Loopback0
ntp master 10 
ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
!
clock timezone PST -8
clock summer-time PDT recurring

R2:
ntp server 10.10.110.1

Show commands:
R1:
HQ-R1#sh ntp status
Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is
2**24
reference time is D37C1C18.AAB00668 (23:37:12.666 PDT Thu Jun 7 2012)
clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is
-0.03145 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 384 sec ago.
HQ-R1#
HQ-R1#
HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
HQ-R1#sh ntp associations

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
disp
x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   9 16 16   377  0.000   0.000
0.240
x~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 50 64   377  0.000 13194.1
3.293
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
configured


R2:
BR1-R2#sh ntp status
Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is
2**24
reference time is . (16:00:00.000 PST Wed Dec 31 1899)
clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is
0.03885 s/s
system poll interval is 64, never updated.
BR1-R2#
BR1-R2#sh ntp ass

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
disp
 ~10.10.110.173.78.73.84 16 55 64   300  0.000 1325166
944.35
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
configured

CUCM:
admin:utils ntp status
ntpd (pid 6322) is running...

 remote   refid  st t when poll reach   delay   offset
jitter

==
*127.127.1.0 LOCAL(0)10 l   63   64  3770.0000.000
0.001
 10.10.110.1.INIT.  16 u   64  128  3701.897   -2.990
1087693


synchronised to local net at stratum 11
   time correct to within 12 ms
   polling server every 512 s

Current time in UTC is : Fri Jun  8 06:22:22 UTC 2012
Current time in America/Los_Angeles is : Thu Jun  7 23:22:22 PDT 2012




--

Scenario 2: Without NTP Master Command.

--
R1:
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
!
clock timezone PST -8
clock summer-time PDT recurring

R2:
BR1-R2#r | s ntp
ntp server 10.10.110.1

Show Commands:

HQ-R1#sh ntp status
Clock is synchronized, stratum 2, reference is 10.10.100.1
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is
2**24
reference time is D37C21AB.D80D6753 (00:00:59.843 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
clock offset is -0.0078 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is
-0.03182 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 264 sec ago.
HQ-R1#

HQ-R1#sh ntp ass

  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
disp
*~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 11 64   377  0.000  -7.866
2.813
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
configured

HQ-R1#sh ntp ass d
10.10.100.1 configured, our_master, sane, valid, stratum 1
ref ID .LOCL., time D37C229E.73B36D17 (00:05:02.451 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 64, peer poll intvl 64
root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.47, reach 377, sync dist 0.00
delay 0.00 msec, offset -7.8662 msec, dispersion 2.81
precision 2**24, version 4
org time D37C22AE.D47DF91B (00:05:18.830 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
rec time D37C22AE.D7653258 (00:05:18.841 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
xmt time D37C22AE.D6E2248F (00:05:18.839 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemm

2012-06-08 Thread Bill
Let us say they want the local router to be ntp server or back up

Then y

Bill


On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Jason Murray murr...@usa.com wrote:

 Do not use ntp master on any of your routers.  The only command that is 
 needed is the ntp server command.  Even if you want one of your routers to be 
 the NTP server you dont need the ntp master command. 
 
 Jason
  
 - Original Message -
 From: Mann Chaddha
 Sent: 06/08/12 12:19 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma
 
 Hi Experts
 
 I am due for my next Lab attempt in 5 days time. I so far have never been 
 able to get marks for NTP section.
 
 So I ask this question to the forum that if someone has ever scored 100% in 
 the Infra Section (without breaking the NDA of course) , can they lend some 
 light on this innocuous looking command, ntp master.
 
 Here are some finding from my POD: [10.10.100.1 = PSTN RTR  10.10.110.1=HQ 
 RTR]
 1. With NTP Master Command
 
 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master 10
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring
 
 R2:
 ntp server 10.10.110.1
 
 Show commands:
 R1:
 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C1C18.AAB00668 (23:37:12.666 PDT Thu Jun 7 2012)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03145 
 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 384 sec ago.
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
 HQ-R1#sh ntp associations
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
 disp
 x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   9 16 16   377  0.000   0.000  
 0.240
 x~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 50 64   377  0.000 13194.1  3.293
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 
 R2:
 BR1-R2#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is . (16:00:00.000 PST Wed Dec 31 1899)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is 0.03885 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, never updated.
 BR1-R2#
 BR1-R2#sh ntp ass
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
 disp
  ~10.10.110.173.78.73.84 16 55 64   300  0.000 1325166 944.35
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 CUCM:
 admin:utils ntp status
 ntpd (pid 6322) is running...
 
  remote   refid  st t when poll reach   delay   offset  
 jitter
 ==
 *127.127.1.0 LOCAL(0)10 l   63   64  3770.0000.000   
 0.001
  10.10.110.1.INIT.  16 u   64  128  3701.897   -2.990 1087693
 
 
 synchronised to local net at stratum 11
time correct to within 12 ms
polling server every 512 s
 
 Current time in UTC is : Fri Jun  8 06:22:22 UTC 2012
 Current time in America/Los_Angeles is : Thu Jun  7 23:22:22 PDT 2012
 
 
 
 --
 
 Scenario 2: Without NTP Master Command.
 --
 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring
 
 R2:
 BR1-R2#r | s ntp
 ntp server 10.10.110.1
 
 Show Commands:
 
 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is synchronized, stratum 2, reference is 10.10.100.1
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C21AB.D80D6753 (00:00:59.843 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 clock offset is -0.0078 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03182 
 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 264 sec ago.
 HQ-R1#
 
 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
 disp
 *~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 11 64   377  0.000  -7.866  2.813
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass d
 10.10.100.1 configured, our_master, sane, valid, stratum 1
 ref ID .LOCL., time D37C229E.73B36D17 (00:05:02.451 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 64, peer poll intvl 64
 root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.47, reach 377, sync dist 0.00
 delay 0.00 msec, offset -7.8662 msec, dispersion 2.81
 precision 2**24, version 4
 org time D37C22AE.D47DF91B (00:05:18.830 PDT Fri

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemm

2012-06-08 Thread Jason Murray
You still only need the ntp server command. Lets say the requirement was to 
sync the HQ router with the PSTN router and then all other devices sync NTP 
with the HQ router. On the HQ rtr the only command needed is ntp server 
10.10.100.2. The rest would point to the HQ rtr ip ntp server 10.10.200.3

 Jason

- Original Message -
From: Bill
Sent: 06/08/12 04:17 PM
To: Jason Murray
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemm

 Let us say they want the local router to be ntp server or back up

 Then y

 Bill 

 On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Jason Murray  murr...@usa.com  wrote:

Do not use ntp master on any of your routers. The only command that is needed 
is the ntp server command. Even if you want one of your routers to be the NTP 
server you dont need the ntp master command. 

 Jason
- Original Message -
From: Mann Chaddha
Sent: 06/08/12 12:19 PM
To:  ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma

Hi Experts

 I am due for my next Lab attempt in 5 days time. I so far have never been able 
to get marks for NTP section.

 So I ask this question to the forum that if someone has ever scored 100% in 
the Infra Section (without breaking the NDA of course) , can they lend some 
light on this innocuous looking command, ntp master.

 Here are some finding from my POD: [10.10.100.1 = PSTN RTR  10.10.110.1=HQ 
RTR]
 1. With NTP Master Command

 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master 10
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring

 R2:
 ntp server 10.10.110.1

 Show commands:
 R1:
 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C1C18.AAB00668 (23:37:12.666 PDT Thu Jun 7 2012)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03145 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 384 sec ago.
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
 HQ-R1#sh ntp associations

 address ref clock st when poll reach delay offset disp
 x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL. 9 16 16 377 0.000 0.000 0.240
 x~10.10.100.1 .LOCL. 1 50 64 377 0.000 13194.1 3.293
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured


 R2:
 BR1-R2#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is . (16:00:00.000 PST Wed Dec 31 1899)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is 0.03885 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, never updated.
 BR1-R2#
 BR1-R2#sh ntp ass

 address ref clock st when poll reach delay offset disp
 ~10.10.110.1 73.78.73.84 16 55 64 300 0.000 1325166 944.35
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured

 CUCM:
 admin:utils ntp status
 ntpd (pid 6322) is running...

 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
 ==
 *127.127.1.0 LOCAL(0) 10 l 63 64 377 0.000 0.000 0.001
 10.10.110.1 .INIT. 16 u 64 128 370 1.897 -2.990 1087693


 synchronised to local net at stratum 11
 time correct to within 12 ms
 polling server every 512 s

 Current time in UTC is : Fri Jun 8 06:22:22 UTC 2012
 Current time in America/Los_Angeles is : Thu Jun 7 23:22:22 PDT 2012



 --

 Scenario 2: Without NTP Master Command.
 --
 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring

 R2:
 BR1-R2#r | s ntp
 ntp server 10.10.110.1

 Show Commands:

 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is synchronized, stratum 2, reference is 10.10.100.1
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C21AB.D80D6753 (00:00:59.843 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 clock offset is -0.0078 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03182 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 264 sec ago.
 HQ-R1#

 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass

 address ref clock st when poll reach delay offset disp
 *~10.10.100.1 .LOCL. 1 11 64 377 0.000 -7.866 2.813
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured

 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass d
 10.10.100.1 configured, our_master, sane, valid, stratum 1
 ref ID .LOCL., time D37C229E.73B36D17 (00:05:02.451 PDT Fri Jun 8 2012)
 our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 64, peer poll intvl 64
 root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.47, reach 377, sync dist

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemm

2012-06-08 Thread Bill
Sorry got called away 

Where I was going is they could test you on the ability to sync with external 
and set your router to a higher stratum number as backup in case primary fails. 
 If the external is not available then your entering ntp server will not work 
because it can not sync time with the ntp server as it is not available but if 
you do the below it could work.

This requires you to sync with external ntp, then update the routers internal 
clock, and finally set ntp master with stratum.  This config is not reliable so 
I doubt they are testing it but they could as it is in scope

Sample is I set the following

Ntp server 10.10.100.2.

Running show ntp stat shows synced with it at stratum 5

Then I sync the internal calendar

Clock update-calendar

Now try 

ntp master 10   
(CUCM won't sync time with lower stratum)

Now the problem I have seen is that sometimes it will sync locally even when 
external ntp is working



Bill


On Jun 8, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Jason Murray murr...@usa.com wrote:

 You still only need the ntp server command.  Lets say the requirement was to 
 sync the HQ router with the PSTN router and then all other devices sync NTP 
 with the HQ router.  On the HQ rtr the only command needed is ntp server 
 10.10.100.2.The rest would point to the HQ rtr ip ntp server 
 10.10.200.3
 
 Jason
 
  
 - Original Message -
 From: Bill
 Sent: 06/08/12 04:17 PM
 To: Jason Murray
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemm
 
 Let us say they want the local router to be ntp server or back up
  
 Then y
 
 Bill
  
 
 On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Jason Murray murr...@usa.com wrote:
  
  
 Do not use ntp master on any of your routers.  The only command that is 
 needed is the ntp server command.  Even if you want one of your routers to 
 be the NTP server you dont need the ntp master command. 
 
 Jason
  
 - Original Message -
 From: Mann Chaddha
 Sent: 06/08/12 12:19 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Master Dilemma
 
 Hi Experts
 
 I am due for my next Lab attempt in 5 days time. I so far have never been 
 able to get marks for NTP section.
 
 So I ask this question to the forum that if someone has ever scored 100% 
 in the Infra Section (without breaking the NDA of course) , can they lend 
 some light on this innocuous looking command, ntp master.
 
 Here are some finding from my POD: [10.10.100.1 = PSTN RTR  
 10.10.110.1=HQ RTR]
 1. With NTP Master Command
 
 R1:
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master 10
 ntp server 10.10.100.1 source Loopback0
 !
 clock timezone PST -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring
 
 R2:
 ntp server 10.10.110.1
 
 Show commands:
 R1:
 HQ-R1#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0008 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D37C1C18.AAB00668 (23:37:12.666 PDT Thu Jun 7 2012)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.03145 
 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 384 sec ago.
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#
 HQ-R1#sh ntp ass
 HQ-R1#sh ntp associations
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
 disp
 x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   9 16 16   377  0.000   0.000  
 0.240
 x~10.10.100.1.LOCL.   1 50 64   377  0.000 13194.1  
 3.293
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ 
 configured
 
 
 R2:
 BR1-R2#sh ntp status
 Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9990 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is . (16:00:00.000 PST Wed Dec 31 1899)
 clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is 0.03885 
 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, never updated.
 BR1-R2#
 BR1-R2#sh ntp ass
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
 disp
  ~10.10.110.173.78.73.84 16 55 64   300  0.000 1325166 
 944.35
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ 
 configured
 
 CUCM:
 admin:utils ntp status
 ntpd (pid 6322) is running...
 
  remote   refid  st t when poll reach   delay   offset  
 jitter
 ==
 *127.127.1.0 LOCAL(0)10 l   63   64  3770.0000.000   
 0.001
  10.10.110.1.INIT.  16 u   64  128  3701.897   -2.990 
 1087693
 
 
 synchronised to local net at stratum 11
time correct to within 12 ms
polling server every 512 s
 
 Current time in UTC is : Fri Jun  8 06:22:22 UTC 2012
 Current time in America/Los_Angeles is : Thu Jun  7 23:22:22 PDT 2012

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Set up lab 1A

2012-04-29 Thread Julien Krieger
Hi,

Are you sure it is not the other way around.
Setting up your CUCM Publisher to synchronize with PSTN-WAN?

Julien

2012/4/25 Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com

 Can anyone advise me where the IP address 10.10.200.2 came from??? the
 question is to configure the PSTN-WAN router to synchronize with cucm. I am
 little bit confused,  can anyone help me in this matter..

 thanks in advance.

 Regards,
 Krishna.

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Set up lab 1A

2012-04-29 Thread Bryan Byrne
10.10.100.2 is the f0/0 interface of the PSTN-WAN router.  I've yet to see a 
lab from IPE that doesn't have you synch the Publisher clock to the PSTN-WAN 
router. 

-Bryan


On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Julien Krieger wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Are you sure it is not the other way around.
 Setting up your CUCM Publisher to synchronize with PSTN-WAN?
 
 Julien
 
 2012/4/25 Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com
 Can anyone advise me where the IP address 10.10.200.2 came from??? the 
 question is to configure the PSTN-WAN router to synchronize with cucm. I am 
 little bit confused,  can anyone help me in this matter.. 
 
 thanks in advance.
 
 Regards,
 Krishna.
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Set up lab 1A

2012-04-25 Thread Krishna
Can anyone advise me where the IP address 10.10.200.2 came from??? the question 
is to configure the PSTN-WAN router to synchronize with cucm. I am little bit 
confused,  can anyone help me in this matter.. 

thanks in advance.

Regards,
Krishna.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server for Presence

2012-04-18 Thread Mohammed Al Baqari
I believe that you need to make sure that all servers are synced with same
NTP. Usually, I sync my CUCM with external NTP and all other nodes to CUCM.

 

In the exam it depends on the requirement.

 

Regards,

Mohammed Al Baqari

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ken Wyan
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:48 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Server for Presence

 

For CUPS server , is there a recommendation to use  CUCM Publisher as NTP
server?

 

Otherwise is it ok to use an external ntp server?

 

Ken

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP for UCCX

2012-02-12 Thread datucha123 datucha123
Hello,

Do we need to set the NTP Server for UCCX Win Server? Or the NTP settings
during the Initial Setup is enough? Well, at least for the exam.

I cannot set the NTP Server for Win2003 (UCCX Server)  -  net time
command does not work, as it is looking for Win Server NTP, and is not
conencting to IOS NTP.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP for UCCX

2012-02-12 Thread Marcelo Alexandria
The initial setup is enough, datucha!



Enviado via iPad

Em 12/02/2012, às 09:51, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com escreveu:

 Hello,
  
 Do we need to set the NTP Server for UCCX Win Server? Or the NTP settings 
 during the Initial Setup is enough? Well, at least for the exam.
  
 I cannot set the NTP Server for Win2003 (UCCX Server)  -  net time command 
 does not work, as it is looking for Win Server NTP, and is not conencting to 
 IOS NTP.
  
  
  
  
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2012-01-03 Thread datucha123 datucha123
Please correct me if I am wrong:

When the CUCM is synchornized with NTP, it synchronizes its UTC time with
NTP, and then we can set the Timezone for the Platform, which will effect
only OS (setting the Timezone in OS does not effect the Time on IP Phones).

But when we are configuring the Date/Time Group, and setting the Timezone,
it is based on the NTP synchornized UTC Time of the OS (Not the Time that
is received by the Timezone in OS).

The same goes for the Routers -  they synchronize time through NTP, and
they basically synchronize their UCT Time, and setting the Timezone on the
Router will not effect the Telephony-service time. When configuring the
TimeZone in Telephony-Service for IP Phones, the TimeZone is based on the
Routers UTC time and not based on the Routers TimeZone corrected time.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2012-01-03 Thread Ken Wyan
For CUCM Phones , timezone of the date/time group applies. We can define an
NTP server for a specific date-time group (independant of CUCM time)
For CME Phones time-zone configured under telephony-service applies. But
CME phones have to take time from Router only. (Router can sync to an
external NTP Server)

I haven't decoded NTP messages to know whether it contain time in UTC or
does it contains NTP server's time  it's time offset from UTC.

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:51 PM, datucha123 datucha123
datucha...@gmail.comwrote:

 Please correct me if I am wrong:

 When the CUCM is synchornized with NTP, it synchronizes its UTC time with
 NTP, and then we can set the Timezone for the Platform, which will effect
 only OS (setting the Timezone in OS does not effect the Time on IP Phones).

 But when we are configuring the Date/Time Group, and setting the Timezone,
 it is based on the NTP synchornized UTC Time of the OS (Not the Time that
 is received by the Timezone in OS).

 The same goes for the Routers -  they synchronize time through NTP, and
 they basically synchronize their UCT Time, and setting the Timezone on the
 Router will not effect the Telephony-service time. When configuring the
 TimeZone in Telephony-Service for IP Phones, the TimeZone is based on the
 Routers UTC time and not based on the Routers TimeZone corrected time.



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2012-01-03 Thread datucha123 datucha123
Well, CUCM IP Phones does not take time from NTP, the NTP Reference is
only for SIP Phones. As well as the SIP Phones on CME can also get time
from NTP  -  ntp-server command in voice register global.

I have made a very simple test, to prove that the UCM Platform TimeZone,
and even the Routers Timezone does not have any impact on IP Phones time:

Well I have changed the UCM Platform Timezone, but the IP Phones still
showed up the older time. So the Platform Timezone does not have any effect
on IP Phones time.
The same was done on the Router  - changed the IOS Timezone, and the IP
Phones were still showing up the older time. So the IOS Timezone does not
effect the IP phones Time.

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote:

 For CUCM Phones , timezone of the date/time group applies. We can define
 an NTP server for a specific date-time group (independant of CUCM time)
 For CME Phones time-zone configured under telephony-service applies. But
 CME phones have to take time from Router only. (Router can sync to an
 external NTP Server)

 I haven't decoded NTP messages to know whether it contain time in UTC or
 does it contains NTP server's time  it's time offset from UTC.

   On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:51 PM, datucha123 datucha123 
 datucha...@gmail.com wrote:

   Please correct me if I am wrong:

 When the CUCM is synchornized with NTP, it synchronizes its UTC time with
 NTP, and then we can set the Timezone for the Platform, which will effect
 only OS (setting the Timezone in OS does not effect the Time on IP Phones).

 But when we are configuring the Date/Time Group, and setting the
 Timezone, it is based on the NTP synchornized UTC Time of the OS (Not the
 Time that is received by the Timezone in OS).

 The same goes for the Routers -  they synchronize time through NTP, and
 they basically synchronize their UCT Time, and setting the Timezone on the
 Router will not effect the Telephony-service time. When configuring the
 TimeZone in Telephony-Service for IP Phones, the TimeZone is based on the
 Routers UTC time and not based on the Routers TimeZone corrected time.



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2012-01-03 Thread Ken Wyan
Thanks for sharing

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:10 PM, datucha123 datucha123
datucha...@gmail.comwrote:

 Well, CUCM IP Phones does not take time from NTP, the NTP Reference is
 only for SIP Phones. As well as the SIP Phones on CME can also get time
 from NTP  -  ntp-server command in voice register global.

 I have made a very simple test, to prove that the UCM Platform TimeZone,
 and even the Routers Timezone does not have any impact on IP Phones time:

 Well I have changed the UCM Platform Timezone, but the IP Phones still
 showed up the older time. So the Platform Timezone does not have any effect
 on IP Phones time.
 The same was done on the Router  - changed the IOS Timezone, and the IP
 Phones were still showing up the older time. So the IOS Timezone does not
 effect the IP phones Time.

   On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote:

 For CUCM Phones , timezone of the date/time group applies. We can define
 an NTP server for a specific date-time group (independant of CUCM time)
 For CME Phones time-zone configured under telephony-service applies. But
 CME phones have to take time from Router only. (Router can sync to an
 external NTP Server)

 I haven't decoded NTP messages to know whether it contain time in UTC or
 does it contains NTP server's time  it's time offset from UTC.

   On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:51 PM, datucha123 datucha123 
 datucha...@gmail.com wrote:

   Please correct me if I am wrong:

 When the CUCM is synchornized with NTP, it synchronizes its UTC time
 with NTP, and then we can set the Timezone for the Platform, which will
 effect only OS (setting the Timezone in OS does not effect the Time on IP
 Phones).

 But when we are configuring the Date/Time Group, and setting the
 Timezone, it is based on the NTP synchornized UTC Time of the OS (Not the
 Time that is received by the Timezone in OS).

 The same goes for the Routers -  they synchronize time through NTP, and
 they basically synchronize their UCT Time, and setting the Timezone on the
 Router will not effect the Telephony-service time. When configuring the
 TimeZone in Telephony-Service for IP Phones, the TimeZone is based on the
 Routers UTC time and not based on the Routers TimeZone corrected time.



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-19 Thread romain mullier
Hi Mohammed,

Unfortunately I got the same result with the ntp peer.

If you get a chance, try it out next time you jump on a proctorlab session
and let me know what your findings are
Thanks!

Romain

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.comwrote:

 On RTR B:

 1. Instead of ntp server you need to use ntp peer
 2. You need to enable ntp access-group peer.

 Do this and lets see the output.

 Regards,
 Mohammed Al Baqari

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:48 AM, romain mullier romain.mull...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
  Hi,
 
  Can anyone explain which are the circumstances that make your NTP
 flagged as falseticker?
 
  The requirement is this:
  Router A is NTP server.
  Router B synchronizes its clock with router A. If router A is
 unavailable then Router B uses its own internal clock.
 
  So basically Router B can synchronize well with router A. But when the
 'ntp master' command is added on B, then after a few minutes, Router B will
 flag both sources as falsetickers.
 
  On router B:
  ntp master 11
  ntp server 10.10.110.1  this is the IP address of A
  clock timezone PST -8
 
  Output on B:
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
   disp
  x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.  10  5 16   377  0.000   0.000
  0.254
  x~10.10.110.1 10.10.100.2  7 17 64   377  0.000 -525.41
  3.920
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
 
 
  Thanks for your input
 
  Romain
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-19 Thread Bill Lake
I think you want router B's time to be close to or the same as router A's,
I believe that you could drop the NTP master on B as this causes confusion
in NTP and just use the NTP master, to ensure the clock is closest to
router A on newer routers use the update calendar or manually set time on
older ones.  This is not the perfect solution you want but on 2800 series
it will set the time very well.

By the way using the ntp server ip command allows your router to be ntp
server to anyone else but just at a lower stratum.  The ntp master is from
my understanding if you have to supply NTP without an external server being
used.



On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, romain mullier romain.mull...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Mohammed,

 Unfortunately I got the same result with the ntp peer.

 If you get a chance, try it out next time you jump on a proctorlab session
 and let me know what your findings are
 Thanks!

 Romain

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.comwrote:

 On RTR B:

 1. Instead of ntp server you need to use ntp peer
 2. You need to enable ntp access-group peer.

 Do this and lets see the output.

 Regards,
 Mohammed Al Baqari

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:48 AM, romain mullier romain.mull...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
  Hi,
 
  Can anyone explain which are the circumstances that make your NTP
 flagged as falseticker?
 
  The requirement is this:
  Router A is NTP server.
  Router B synchronizes its clock with router A. If router A is
 unavailable then Router B uses its own internal clock.
 
  So basically Router B can synchronize well with router A. But when the
 'ntp master' command is added on B, then after a few minutes, Router B will
 flag both sources as falsetickers.
 
  On router B:
  ntp master 11
  ntp server 10.10.110.1  this is the IP address of A
  clock timezone PST -8
 
  Output on B:
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
   disp
  x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.  10  5 16   377  0.000   0.000
  0.254
  x~10.10.110.1 10.10.100.2  7 17 64   377  0.000 -525.41
  3.920
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
 
 
  Thanks for your input
 
  Romain
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-19 Thread Bill Lake
Sorry meant I believe that you could drop the NTP master on B as this
causes confusion in NTP and just use the *NTP server*,

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think you want router B's time to be close to or the same as router A's,
 I believe that you could drop the NTP master on B as this causes confusion
 in NTP and just use the NTP master, to ensure the clock is closest to
 router A on newer routers use the update calendar or manually set time on
 older ones.  This is not the perfect solution you want but on 2800 series
 it will set the time very well.

 By the way using the ntp server ip command allows your router to be ntp
 server to anyone else but just at a lower stratum.  The ntp master is from
 my understanding if you have to supply NTP without an external server being
 used.



 On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, romain mullier 
 romain.mull...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Mohammed,

 Unfortunately I got the same result with the ntp peer.

 If you get a chance, try it out next time you jump on a proctorlab
 session and let me know what your findings are
 Thanks!

 Romain

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.comwrote:

 On RTR B:

 1. Instead of ntp server you need to use ntp peer
 2. You need to enable ntp access-group peer.

 Do this and lets see the output.

 Regards,
 Mohammed Al Baqari

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:48 AM, romain mullier romain.mull...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
  Hi,
 
  Can anyone explain which are the circumstances that make your NTP
 flagged as falseticker?
 
  The requirement is this:
  Router A is NTP server.
  Router B synchronizes its clock with router A. If router A is
 unavailable then Router B uses its own internal clock.
 
  So basically Router B can synchronize well with router A. But when the
 'ntp master' command is added on B, then after a few minutes, Router B will
 flag both sources as falsetickers.
 
  On router B:
  ntp master 11
  ntp server 10.10.110.1  this is the IP address of A
  clock timezone PST -8
 
  Output on B:
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay
  offset   disp
  x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.  10  5 16   377  0.000
 0.000  0.254
  x~10.10.110.1 10.10.100.2  7 17 64   377  0.000
 -525.41  3.920
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
 
 
  Thanks for your input
 
  Romain
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-15 Thread romain mullier
Hi,

Can anyone explain which are the circumstances that make your NTP flagged
as falseticker?

The requirement is this:
Router A is NTP server.
Router B synchronizes its clock with router A. If router A is unavailable
then Router B uses its own internal clock.

So basically Router B can synchronize well with router A. But when the 'ntp
master' command is added on B, then after a few minutes, Router B will flag
both sources as falsetickers.

On router B:
ntp master 11
ntp server 10.10.110.1  this is the IP address of A
clock timezone PST -8

Output on B:
  address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
disp
x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.  10  5 16   377  0.000   0.000
0.254
x~10.10.110.1 10.10.100.2  7 17 64   377  0.000 -525.41
3.920
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured


Thanks for your input

Romain
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-15 Thread Mohd Baqari
On RTR B:

1. Instead of ntp server you need to use ntp peer
2. You need to enable ntp access-group peer.

Do this and lets see the output.

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:48 AM, romain mullier romain.mull...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 Hi,
 
 Can anyone explain which are the circumstances that make your NTP flagged as 
 falseticker?
 
 The requirement is this:
 Router A is NTP server.
 Router B synchronizes its clock with router A. If router A is unavailable 
 then Router B uses its own internal clock.
 
 So basically Router B can synchronize well with router A. But when the 'ntp 
 master' command is added on B, then after a few minutes, Router B will flag 
 both sources as falsetickers.
 
 On router B:
 ntp master 11
 ntp server 10.10.110.1  this is the IP address of A
 clock timezone PST -8
 
 Output on B:
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
 x~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.  10  5 16   377  0.000   0.000  0.254
 x~10.10.110.1 10.10.100.2  7 17 64   377  0.000 -525.41  3.920
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 
 Thanks for your input
 
 Romain
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-19 Thread Ray
Ntp is not slow when i put the ntp master command on HQ router and the cucm syn 
right the way. i took off the ntp master from the hq and only have ntp server 
and ntp source lo0. and reboot the cucm and the hq. and let it set for 4hrs to 
5hrs and the cucm would not syn, but the moment i put the ntp master it syns 
within 2 mins... you can try it in you lab and let me know.. make sure you 
reboot the cucm and the hq router...



From: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

NTP is by nature slow.  An earlier post pointed out the correct method.  If the 
question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then the ntp 
master command will break this requirement.  All that is required on the HQ 
router is ntp server x.x.x.x

This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco documentation.  
The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to override 
a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous.  As long as the 
ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source then the hq 
router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the ntp master 
command.

Justin Barksdale
CCIE# 29866
Voice

Sent from my iPhone 4.  Please excuse any typos.

On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:

 Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-19 Thread Justin Barksdale
If this is the case then the address you are pointing to at the pstn is 
incorrect.  If you add the ntp server to the router and do show ntp status the 
router MUST be syncing with an external source or UCM will not sync.  
Furthermore a reboot is not required on UCM or ther router.  Simply add the 
address to UCM and do utils ntp restart from cli.  The key is that the ntp 
source the router is syncing with must be valid.  

Sent from my iPhone 4.

On Sep 19, 2011, at 1:12 AM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Ntp is not slow when i put the ntp master command on HQ router and the cucm 
 syn right the way. i took off the ntp master from the hq and only have ntp 
 server and ntp source lo0. and reboot the cucm and the hq. and let it set for 
 4hrs to 5hrs and the cucm would not syn, but the moment i put the ntp master 
 it syns within 2 mins... you can try it in you lab and let me know.. make 
 sure you reboot the cucm and the hq router...
 
 From: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 
 NTP is by nature slow.  An earlier post pointed out the correct method.  If 
 the question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then the 
 ntp master command will break this requirement.  All that is required on the 
 HQ router is ntp server x.x.x.x
 
 This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco documentation.  
 The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to 
 override a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous.  As 
 long as the ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source 
 then the hq router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the ntp 
 master command.
 
 Justin Barksdale
 CCIE# 29866
 Voice
 
 Sent from my iPhone 4.  Please excuse any typos.
 
 On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:
 
  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-19 Thread edgar feliz
Ray,

I have never put the NTP master command on my routers and I have not had an 
issue with the CUCM sync to the (HQ) router. I use mainly the VRACKs from 
proctor, and in my little lab at home it's the same. As long as I have set the 
time I want in the PSTN router for the HQ router to sync off I have not had an 
issue.

EJF



From: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
To: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


Ntp is not slow when i put the ntp master command on HQ router and the cucm syn 
right the way. i took off the ntp master from the hq and only have ntp server 
and ntp source lo0. and reboot the cucm and the hq. and let it set for 4hrs to 
5hrs and the cucm would not syn, but the moment i put the ntp master it syns 
within 2 mins... you can try it in you lab and let me know.. make sure you 
reboot the cucm and the hq router...



From: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

NTP is by nature slow.  An earlier post pointed out the correct method.  If the 
question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then the ntp 
master command will break this requirement.  All that is required on the HQ 
router is ntp server x.x.x.x

This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco documentation.  
The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to override 
a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous.  As long as the 
ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source then the hq 
router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the ntp master 
command.

Justin
 Barksdale
CCIE# 29866
Voice

Sent from my iPhone 4.  Please excuse any typos.

On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:

 Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-19 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
Hello All ,

i have review the NTP principle again with my Colleagues and with Amit
who did lab for this ( Thanks ALOT)  and we have done some show
commands on the CCM and the IOS in regard of this issue

what we found is that the the lowest stratum is the Best and stratum
-0 is the lowest value we have in Cisco world,
what Justin and the other stated is correct , we will not need Master
command to sync the other internal network components to the HQ router
, its enough to sync HQ with the UTC based server and then the other
routers should take the time correctly from the HQ on UTC based as
well

the CCM pub is stratum 11 by default and the SUB is 12 , do utils ntp
status before you sync them ,  so based on the above , to sync the CCM
with the HQ ntp please make sure that you have Stratum lower than 11
at your HQ and you should be good to go ,

Justain , Amit , everyone , thank you for sharing / discussing  this
issue , this is very helpful and add new info for me and i hope the
same happened for another people

Best Regards

Ash

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net wrote:
 If this is the case then the address you are pointing to at the pstn is
 incorrect.  If you add the ntp server to the router and do show ntp status
 the router MUST be syncing with an external source or UCM will not sync.
  Furthermore a reboot is not required on UCM or ther router.  Simply add the
 address to UCM and do utils ntp restart from cli.  The key is that the ntp
 source the router is syncing with must be valid.

 Sent from my iPhone 4.
 On Sep 19, 2011, at 1:12 AM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Ntp is not slow when i put the ntp master command on HQ router and the cucm
 syn right the way. i took off the ntp master from the hq and only have ntp
 server and ntp source lo0. and reboot the cucm and the hq. and let it set
 for 4hrs to 5hrs and the cucm would not syn, but the moment i put the ntp
 master it syns within 2 mins... you can try it in you lab and let me know..
 make sure you reboot the cucm and the hq router...
 
 From: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 NTP is by nature slow.  An earlier post pointed out the correct method.  If
 the question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then
 the ntp master command will break this requirement.  All that is required on
 the HQ router is ntp server x.x.x.x

 This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco documentation.
 The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to
 override a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous.  As
 long as the ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source
 then the hq router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the
 ntp master command.

 Justin Barksdale
 CCIE# 29866
 Voice

 Sent from my iPhone 4.  Please excuse any typos.

 On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:

 Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-19 Thread Ray
yes you lower the stratum at HQ with the ntp master command, but the issue is 
the UTC server has the higest stratum... so if you put any stratum on HQ it 
will only syn to itself and not the UTC server higher stratum will syn from 
lower stratum that is how it works..  I am going to put only ntp server and ntp 
source on hq and set the ntp on cucm to be hq loopback and let it set for hours 
and see it  can syn again... if it doesnt syn i will put the ntp master and 
reboot and see if it syns..



From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
To: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

Hello All ,

i have review the NTP principle again with my Colleagues and with Amit
who did lab for this ( Thanks ALOT)  and we have done some show
commands on the CCM and the IOS in regard of this issue

what we found is that the the lowest stratum is the Best and stratum
-0 is the lowest value we have in Cisco world,
what Justin and the other stated is correct , we will not need Master
command to sync the other internal network components to the HQ router
, its enough to sync HQ with the UTC based server and then the other
routers should take the time correctly from the HQ on UTC based as
well

the CCM pub is stratum 11 by default and the SUB is 12 , do utils ntp
status before you sync them ,  so based on the above , to sync the CCM
with the HQ ntp please make sure that you have Stratum lower than 11
at your HQ and you should be good to go ,

Justain , Amit , everyone , thank you for sharing / discussing  this
issue , this is very helpful and add new info for me and i hope the
same happened for another people

Best Regards

Ash

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net wrote:
 If this is the case then the address you are pointing to at the pstn is
 incorrect.  If you add the ntp server to the router and do show ntp status
 the router MUST be syncing with an external source or UCM will not sync.
  Furthermore a reboot is not required on UCM or ther router.  Simply add the
 address to UCM and do utils ntp restart from cli.  The key is that the ntp
 source the router is syncing with must be valid.

 Sent from my iPhone 4.
 On Sep 19, 2011, at 1:12 AM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Ntp is not slow when i put the ntp master command on HQ router and the cucm
 syn right the way. i took off the ntp master from the hq and only have ntp
 server and ntp source lo0. and reboot the cucm and the hq. and let it set
 for 4hrs to 5hrs and the cucm would not syn, but the moment i put the ntp
 master it syns within 2 mins... you can try it in you lab and let me know..
 make sure you reboot the cucm and the hq router...
 
 From: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 NTP is by nature slow.  An earlier post pointed out the correct method.  If
 the question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then
 the ntp master command will break this requirement.  All that is required on
 the HQ router is ntp server x.x.x.x

 This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco documentation.
 The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to
 override a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous.  As
 long as the ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source
 then the hq router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the
 ntp master command.

 Justin Barksdale
 CCIE# 29866
 Voice

 Sent from my iPhone 4.  Please excuse any typos.

 On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:

 Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-19 Thread Matt Buttner
 or NTP server is configured, the router can
synchronize fine with the defined time source.
Workaround:
If configuring only ntp master or ntp server, the router will synchronize
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetailsbugId=CSCsw30737from=summary

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
 yes you lower the stratum at HQ with the ntp master command, but the issue
 is the UTC server has the higest stratum... so if you put any stratum on HQ
 it will only syn to itself and not the UTC server higher stratum will
 syn from lower stratum that is how it works..  I am going to put only ntp
 server and ntp source on hq and set the ntp on cucm to be hq loopback and
 let it set for hours and see it  can syn again... if it doesnt syn i will
 put the ntp master and reboot and see if it syns..
 
 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 To: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
 Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 8:51 AM
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 Hello All ,

 i have review the NTP principle again with my Colleagues and with Amit
 who did lab for this ( Thanks ALOT)  and we have done some show
 commands on the CCM and the IOS in regard of this issue

 what we found is that the the lowest stratum is the Best and stratum
 -0 is the lowest value we have in Cisco world,
 what Justin and the other stated is correct , we will not need Master
 command to sync the other internal network components to the HQ router
 , its enough to sync HQ with the UTC based server and then the other
 routers should take the time correctly from the HQ on UTC based as
 well

 the CCM pub is stratum 11 by default and the SUB is 12 , do utils ntp
 status before you sync them ,  so based on the above , to sync the CCM
 with the HQ ntp please make sure that you have Stratum lower than 11
 at your HQ and you should be good to go ,

 Justain , Amit , everyone , thank you for sharing / discussing  this
 issue , this is very helpful and add new info for me and i hope the
 same happened for another people

 Best Regards

 Ash

 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
 wrote:
 If this is the case then the address you are pointing to at the pstn is
 incorrect.  If you add the ntp server to the router and do show ntp status
 the router MUST be syncing with an external source or UCM will not sync.
  Furthermore a reboot is not required on UCM or ther router.  Simply add
 the
 address to UCM and do utils ntp restart from cli.  The key is that the ntp
 source the router is syncing with must be valid.

 Sent from my iPhone 4.
 On Sep 19, 2011, at 1:12 AM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Ntp is not slow when i put the ntp master command on HQ router and the
 cucm
 syn right the way. i took off the ntp master from the hq and only have ntp
 server and ntp source lo0. and reboot the cucm and the hq. and let it set
 for 4hrs to 5hrs and the cucm would not syn, but the moment i put the ntp
 master it syns within 2 mins... you can try it in you lab and let me
 know..
 make sure you reboot the cucm and the hq router...
 
 From: Justin Barksdale jus...@barksdale.net
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 NTP is by nature slow.  An earlier post pointed out the correct method.
 If
 the question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then
 the ntp master command will break this requirement.  All that is required
 on
 the HQ router is ntp server x.x.x.x

 This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco
 documentation.
 The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to
 override a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous.  As
 long as the ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source
 then the hq router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the
 ntp master command.

 Justin Barksdale
 CCIE# 29866
 Voice

 Sent from my iPhone 4.  Please excuse any typos.

 On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:

 Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ray
i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut my 
f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below.. good

hq#sh ntp ass
  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
disp*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     63     64   377  0.000 2901006  
3.641 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ 
configured
hq#sho run | s ntpntp source Loopback0ntp server 157.26.1.100
--- On Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com wrote:

From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM

Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
it sync to a server on stratum 15?

Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
 looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make the
 Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me when i
 took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set to
 stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC server... I
 was confused  here..
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 hq#sho ntp ass
   address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~127.127.1.1     .LOCL.           7     12     16   377  0.000   0.000
  0.238
  ~157.26.1.100    78.85.76.76     16     34     64   376  0.000 2901016
  2.591
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
Hi all ,

 if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our internal
network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me if i am
wrong ,

the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you have
added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
and so your internal router got the highest level ,

to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure that
you are synced and then use the master command with lower *stratum level
and this should do the trick for you ,

below the link :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

Ash
*
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut
 my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below..
 good


 hq#sh ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 --- On *Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com* wrote:


 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM


 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?

 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray 
 jonha...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make
 the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me when
 i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set
 to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000   0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
you are able to sync with out the master command to the HQ router ?
can you get show ntp status assoc please ?

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Ashraf,

 You will still be able to sync time without the master command.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:28:12 -0700

 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 Hi all ,

  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our internal
 network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me if i am
 wrong ,

 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you
 have added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,

 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure that
 you are synced and then use the master command with lower *stratum level
 and this should do the trick for you ,

 below the link :

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

 Ash
 *
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut
 my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below..
 good


 hq#sh ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 --- On *Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com* wrote:


 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM


 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?

 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray 
 jonha...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make
 the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me
 when i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set
 to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000   0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com


 ___ For more information
 regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
 www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Mini Me
Yes I did when I was studying and it works.Make sure the HQ router syncs
with external NTP .  I passed and no longer have a lab to send you output.
Sorry about that.

HTH

From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:24:06 -0700
To:  Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
Cc:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

you are able to sync with out the master command to the HQ router ?
can you get show ntp status assoc please ?

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Ashraf,
 
 You will still be able to sync time without the master command.
 
 HTH
 
 From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:28:12 -0700
 
 To:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc:  ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 
 Hi all ,
 
  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our internal
 network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me if i am
 wrong ,
 
 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you have
 added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,
 
 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure that
 you are synced and then use the master command with lower stratum level
 and this should do the trick for you ,
 
 below the link :
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.
 html#wp1004877
 
 Ash
 
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut my
 f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below.. good
 
 hq#sh ntp ass
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
 3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
 --- On Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com wrote:
 
 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM
 
 
 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?
 
 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)
 
 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
 
 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
 
 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 tel:%2B1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
 
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 http://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com  wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make
 the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me when
i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set
 to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000   0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
  visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 ___ For more information regarding
 industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
 http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check
 out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
okay thanks for the clarification but can you please explain the principle
or the logic behind that ? if the router is not master it cannot provide
clocking
how its working then ?

please clarify
Ash

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes I did when I was studying and it works.Make sure the HQ router syncs
 with external NTP .  I passed and no longer have a lab to send you output.
 Sorry about that.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:24:06 -0700
 To: Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
 Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 you are able to sync with out the master command to the HQ router ?
 can you get show ntp status assoc please ?

 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Ashraf,

 You will still be able to sync time without the master command.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:28:12 -0700

 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 Hi all ,

  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our
 internal network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me
 if i am wrong ,

 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you
 have added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,

 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure
 that you are synced and then use the master command with lower *stratum
 level
 and this should do the trick for you ,

 below the link :

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

 Ash
 *
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut
 my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below..
 good


 hq#sh ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 --- On *Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com* wrote:


 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM


 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?

 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray 
 jonha...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make
 the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me
 when i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was
 set to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000   0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com


 ___ For more information
 regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
 www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Mini Me
It will work as an ntp source as long as it is synced with an ntp server.
The master command only changes the stratum of the ntp source.

HTH

From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:31:51 -0700
To:  Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
Cc:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

okay thanks for the clarification but can you please explain the principle
or the logic behind that ? if the router is not master it cannot provide
clocking
how its working then ?

please clarify 
Ash

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes I did when I was studying and it works.Make sure the HQ router syncs with
 external NTP .  I passed and no longer have a lab to send you output. Sorry
 about that.
 
 HTH
 
 From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:24:06 -0700
 To:  Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
 Cc:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
 Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 
 you are able to sync with out the master command to the HQ router ?
 can you get show ntp status assoc please ?
 
 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Ashraf,
 
 You will still be able to sync time without the master command.
 
 HTH
 
 From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:28:12 -0700
 
 To:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc:  ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 
 Hi all ,
 
  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our internal
 network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me if i am
 wrong ,
 
 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you have
 added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,
 
 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure that
 you are synced and then use the master command with lower stratum level
 and this should do the trick for you ,
 
 below the link :
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303
 .html#wp1004877
 
 Ash
 
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut my
 f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below.. good
 
 hq#sh ntp ass
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
 3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
 --- On Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com wrote:
 
 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM
 
 
 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?
 
 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)
 
 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
 
 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
 
 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 tel:%2B1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
 
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 http://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com  wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make
 the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me
 when i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set
 to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000   0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
thats intersting info , can you please let me know if this is docmented
anywhere at Cisco DOC's ?

Ash

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

 It will work as an ntp source as long as it is synced with an ntp server.
 The master command only changes the stratum of the ntp source.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:31:51 -0700

 To: Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
 Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 okay thanks for the clarification but can you please explain the principle
 or the logic behind that ? if the router is not master it cannot provide
 clocking
 how its working then ?

 please clarify
 Ash

 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes I did when I was studying and it works.Make sure the HQ router syncs
 with external NTP .  I passed and no longer have a lab to send you output.
 Sorry about that.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:24:06 -0700
 To: Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
 Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 you are able to sync with out the master command to the HQ router ?
 can you get show ntp status assoc please ?

 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Ashraf,

 You will still be able to sync time without the master command.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:28:12 -0700

 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 Hi all ,

  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our
 internal network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me
 if i am wrong ,

 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you
 have added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,

 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure
 that you are synced and then use the master command with lower *stratum
 level
 and this should do the trick for you ,

 below the link :

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

 Ash
 *
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no
 shut my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as
 below.. good


 hq#sh ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
   disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 --- On *Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com* wrote:


 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM


 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?

 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray 
 jonha...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not
 make the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me
 when i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was
 set to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay
  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000
 0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000
 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ray
the question was asked to sny hq with UTC server at 157.26.1.100 , and then syn 
cucm from hq router. 
when i did this command below:
ntp master
ntp source lo0
ntp server 157.26.1.100

 i found out that UTC was set at stratum 16. so there was no way for me to set 
hq at a higer statum than the stratum at UTC server. so i was confused on wat 
to do here because hq router has to be an ntp master in order to provide 
clocking, but when i put the NTP master comand it will make Hq router syn the 
clock from itself; and it will never syn with the UTC server.. I new that for a 
router to provide clocking it has to be a master.. but this question through me 
off.. i was confused alot here that is why i brought this up. 
even thought without the NTp master command the Hq router can syn the clock 
from the UTC server, but It is not providing the clock to the cucm because it 
is not a master.. I guest the question was said wrong.. I didnt know if i 
should have raise a flag or not.. 
so at the moment Hq is only syning the clock from the UTC server but not 
providing the clock to UTC. Some one may run into this issue too.. It really 
killed some of my time. i was total upset about this.




From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
To: Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com
Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com; ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


okay thanks for the clarification but can you please explain the principle or 
the logic behind that ? if the router is not master it cannot provide clocking
how its working then ? 

please clarify 
Ash


On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

Yes I did when I was studying and it works.Make sure the HQ router syncs with 
external NTP .  I passed and no longer have a lab to send you output. Sorry 
about that.


HTH

From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:24:06 -0700
To:  Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
Cc:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


you are able to sync with out the master command to the HQ router ? 
can you get show ntp status assoc please ?


On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Ashraf,


You will still be able to sync time without the master command.


HTH

From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:28:12 -0700

To:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
Cc:  ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


Hi all ,

 if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our internal 
network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me if i am 
wrong ,

the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you have 
added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
and so your internal router got the highest level , 

to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure that 
you are synced and then use the master command with lower stratum level 
and this should do the trick for you ,

below the link :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

Ash


On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut my 
f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below.. good




hq#sh ntp ass


  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
disp
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     63     64   377  0.000 2901006  
3.641
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured


hq#sho run | s ntp
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 157.26.1.100
--- On Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.comwrote:


From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM



Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
it sync to a server on stratum 15?

Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
 looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make 
 the
 Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me when 
 i
 took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set 
 to
 stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC 
 server... I
 was confused  here..
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master
 ntp server

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ray


hqen
hq#sho ntp ass

  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     54     64   377  0.000  -4.488  4.467
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
hq#
hq#
hq#
hq#
hq#sho ntp clo
hq#sho ntp st  
hq#sho ntp status 
Clock is synchronized, stratum 16, reference is 157.26.1.100  
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0005 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D2207921.9594D724 (23:05:21.584 SDT Sun Sep 18 2011)
clock offset is -0.0045 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.01989 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 1 sec ago.
hq#


From: Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com
To: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com; ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


It will work as an ntp source as long as it is synced with an ntp server. The 
master command only changes the stratum of the ntp source.

HTH
From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:31:51 -0700
To:  Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
Cc:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

okay thanks for the clarification but can you please explain the principle or 
the logic behind that ? if the router is not master it cannot provide clocking
how its working then ? 

please clarify 
Ash


On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

Yes I did when I was studying and it works.Make sure the HQ router syncs with 
external NTP .  I passed and no longer have a lab to send you output. Sorry 
about that.


HTH

From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:24:06 -0700
To:  Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
Cc:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


you are able to sync with out the master command to the HQ router ? 
can you get show ntp status assoc please ?


On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Ashraf,


You will still be able to sync time without the master command.


HTH

From:  Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
Date:  Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:28:12 -0700

To:  Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
Cc:  ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


Hi all ,

 if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our internal 
network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me if i am 
wrong ,

the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you have 
added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
and so your internal router got the highest level , 

to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure that 
you are synced and then use the master command with lower stratum level 
and this should do the trick for you ,

below the link :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

Ash


On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut my 
f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below.. good




hq#sh ntp ass


  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
disp
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     63     64   377  0.000 2901006  
3.641
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured


hq#sho run | s ntp
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 157.26.1.100
--- On Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.comwrote:


From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM



Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
it sync to a server on stratum 15?

Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
 looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make 
 the
 Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me when 
 i
 took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set 
 to
 stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC 
 server... I
 was confused  here..
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 hq#sho ntp ass
   address

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ray
oh my god.. i think the trick is the do ntp server 157.26.1.100 first.. and 
wait for it to syn. then you add ntp master 6(or any stratum).. it work see the 
output below.
but i will reboot the router and see it it still works when i comes back on...  
see the out put below. this is terrific.. oh my god..
ccsrv#clear line 34
[confirm]
 [OK]
accsrv#r2
Translating r2...domain server (4.2.2.2)
Trying R2 (1.1.1.1, 2034)... Open

hqen
hq#sho ntp ass

  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     54     64   377  0.000  -4.488  4.467
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
hq#
hq#
hq#
hq#
hq#sho ntp clo
hq#sho ntp st  
hq#sho ntp status 
Clock is synchronized, stratum 16, reference is 157.26.1.100  
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0005 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D2207921.9594D724 (23:05:21.584 SDT Sun Sep 18 2011)
clock offset is -0.0045 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.01989 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 1 sec ago.
hq#
hq#
hq#
hq#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
hq(config)#ntp mas
hq(config)#ntp master 6
hq(config)#end
hq#
Sep 18 14:06:27.005: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
hq#
hq#
hq#sho ntp status 
Clock is synchronized, stratum 16, reference is 157.26.1.100  
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0005 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D2207921.9594D724 (23:05:21.584 SDT Sun Sep 18 2011)
clock offset is -0.0045 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.01989 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 73 sec ago.
hq#sho ntp ass    
hq#sho ntp associations 

  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
 ~127.127.1.1     .LOCL.           5      -     16     0  0.000   0.000 16000.
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     21     64   377  0.000  -4.524  3.551
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
hq#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
hq(config)#inter f0/0
hq(config-if)#shut
hq(config-if)#
Sep 18 14:07:02.465: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 10.11.11.70 on 
FastEthernet0/0.1 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
Sep 18 14:07:02.465: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 67.246.98.116 on 
FastEthernet0/0.1 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
Sep 18 14:07:04.457: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state 
to administratively down
Sep 18 14:07:05.457: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface 
FastEthernet0/0, changed state to down
hq(config-if)#
hq(config-if)#no shut
hq(config-if)#end
hq#
Sep 18 14:07:11.725: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
hq#
hq#
Sep 18 14:07:12.025: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state 
to up
Sep 18 14:07:13.025: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface 
FastEthernet0/0, changed state to up
hq#sho ntp associations 

  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
 ~127.127.1.1     .LOCL.           5      6     16     3  0.000   0.000 3937.5
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     59     64   377  0.000  -4.524  3.551
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
hq#sho ntp status       
Clock is synchronized, stratum 16, reference is 157.26.1.100  
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0005 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D2207921.9594D724 (23:05:21.584 SDT Sun Sep 18 2011)
clock offset is -0.0045 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.01989 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 132 sec ago.
hq#sho ntp associations 

  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
 ~127.127.1.1     .LOCL.           5      2     16     7  0.000   0.000 1937.6
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     72     64   376  0.000  -4.524  3.551
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
hq#
Sep 18 14:07:55.769: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 10.11.11.70 on 
FastEthernet0/0.1 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
Sep 18 14:07:55.773: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 67.246.98.116 on 
FastEthernet0/0.1 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done



From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
To: Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com
Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com; ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


thats intersting info , can you please let me know if this is docmented 
anywhere

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
yeah , this is correct, thats what ive been talking about :)

sorry for what happened in your lab , as this is a CCIE level exam i don't
believe personally that any Book in the world can give or provide the exam
Questions no matter how come the people who wrote the book got the Questions
from , i think they can give the way of the Questions in the exam but we
really need to have deep understand of how things working in order to
avoid/fix  just like the one you faced or shared

Ash

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 hqen
 hq#sho ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 54 64   377  0.000  -4.488
  4.467
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
 hq#
 hq#
 hq#
 hq#
 hq#sho ntp clo
 hq#sho ntp st
 hq#sho ntp status
 Clock is synchronized, stratum 16, reference is 157.26.1.100
 nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0005 Hz, precision is 2**24
 reference time is D2207921.9594D724 (23:05:21.584 SDT Sun Sep 18 2011)
 clock offset is -0.0045 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
 root dispersion is 0.00 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
 loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.01989
 s/s
 system poll interval is 64, last update was 1 sec ago.
 hq#
 --
 *From:* Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com
 *To:* Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com

 *Cc:* Ray jonha...@yahoo.com; ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
 *Sent:* Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:35 AM

 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 It will work as an ntp source as long as it is synced with an ntp server.
 The master command only changes the stratum of the ntp source.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:31:51 -0700
 To: Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
 Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 okay thanks for the clarification but can you please explain the principle
 or the logic behind that ? if the router is not master it cannot provide
 clocking
 how its working then ?

 please clarify
 Ash

 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes I did when I was studying and it works.Make sure the HQ router syncs
 with external NTP .  I passed and no longer have a lab to send you output.
 Sorry about that.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 06:24:06 -0700
 To: Prashant Patel cciev.min...@gmail.com
 Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 you are able to sync with out the master command to the HQ router ?
 can you get show ntp status assoc please ?

 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mini Me cciev.min...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Ashraf,

 You will still be able to sync time without the master command.

 HTH

 From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:28:12 -0700

 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

 Hi all ,

  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our internal
 network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me if i am
 wrong ,

 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you
 have added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,

 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure that
 you are synced and then use the master command with lower *stratum level
 and this should do the trick for you ,

 below the link :

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

 Ash
 *
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut
 my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below..
 good


 hq#sh ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 --- On *Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com* wrote:


 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM


 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?

 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
i have read this note but it didn't stated that the router can provide clock
without master command , in here we have one ntp source in our network which
is the HQ (from all the network entities ) and HQ is getting clock from
external NTP ,

Ray , can you please try what guys suggest here ?

Ash

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

 We should not use ntp master on HQ router.  This command is only needed
 if the router cannot reach any NTP source.  Since the HQ router can reach
 the backbone (PSTN) router, it does not require ntp master.

 If you look at the link, you'll notice this note:

 ===
 Use this command with extreme caution. It is very easy to override valid
 time sources using this command, especially if a low stratum number is
 configured. Configuring multiple machines in the same network with the *ntp
 master* command can cause instability in timekeeping if the machines do
 not agree on the time.
 ===

 Michael


 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all ,

  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our
 internal network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me
 if i am wrong ,

 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you
 have added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,

 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure
 that you are synced and then use the master command with lower *stratum
 level
 and this should do the trick for you ,

 below the link :

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

 Ash
 *

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut
 my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below..
 good


 hq#sh ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 --- On *Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com* wrote:


 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM


 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?

 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray 
 jonha...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make
 the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me
 when i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was
 set to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000   0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Michael Luo
Take a look at this link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1001926

The two examples explain when you'll need ntp master.

Hope this helps!
Michael

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.comwrote:

 i have read this note but it didn't stated that the router can provide
 clock without master command , in here we have one ntp source in our network
 which is the HQ (from all the network entities ) and HQ is getting clock
 from external NTP ,

 Ray , can you please try what guys suggest here ?

 Ash


 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

 We should not use ntp master on HQ router.  This command is only needed
 if the router cannot reach any NTP source.  Since the HQ router can reach
 the backbone (PSTN) router, it does not require ntp master.

 If you look at the link, you'll notice this note:

 ===
 Use this command with extreme caution. It is very easy to override valid
 time sources using this command, especially if a low stratum number is
 configured. Configuring multiple machines in the same network with the *ntp
 master* command can cause instability in timekeeping if the machines do
 not agree on the time.
 ===

 Michael


 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all ,

  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our
 internal network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me
 if i am wrong ,

 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you
 have added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,

 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure
 that you are synced and then use the master command with lower *stratum
 level
 and this should do the trick for you ,

 below the link :

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

 Ash
 *

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no
 shut my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as
 below.. good


 hq#sh ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
   disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 --- On *Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com* wrote:


 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM


 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?

 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray 
 jonha...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not
 make the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me
 when i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was
 set to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay
  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000
 0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000
 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




___
For more

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
Thank you Michael , lets wait for Ray to check the lab results for this
Ash

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

 Take a look at this link:
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1001926

 The two examples explain when you'll need ntp master.

 Hope this helps!
 Michael


 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.comwrote:

 i have read this note but it didn't stated that the router can provide
 clock without master command , in here we have one ntp source in our network
 which is the HQ (from all the network entities ) and HQ is getting clock
 from external NTP ,

 Ray , can you please try what guys suggest here ?

 Ash


 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

 We should not use ntp master on HQ router.  This command is only needed
 if the router cannot reach any NTP source.  Since the HQ router can reach
 the backbone (PSTN) router, it does not require ntp master.

 If you look at the link, you'll notice this note:

 ===
 Use this command with extreme caution. It is very easy to override valid
 time sources using this command, especially if a low stratum number is
 configured. Configuring multiple machines in the same network with the *ntp
 master* command can cause instability in timekeeping if the machines do
 not agree on the time.
 ===

 Michael


 On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all ,

  if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our
 internal network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me
 if i am wrong ,

 the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you
 have added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
 and so your internal router got the highest level ,

 to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure
 that you are synced and then use the master command with lower *stratum
 level
 and this should do the trick for you ,

 below the link :

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

 Ash
 *

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no
 shut my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as
 below.. good


 hq#sh ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
   disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006
  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100

 --- On *Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com* wrote:


 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM


 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?

 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com http://mc/compose?to=mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray 
 jonha...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=jonha...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not
 make the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me
 when i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was
 set to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC
 server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay
  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000
 0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000
 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Brian Mulgrew
 are synced and then use the master command with lower stratum level 
 and this should do the trick for you ,
 
 below the link :
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877
 
 Ash
 
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
 i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut my 
 f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below.. good
 
 
 hq#sh ntp ass
 
   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
 *~157.26.1.100127.127.1.1 15 63 64   377  0.000 2901006  3.641
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
 
 hq#sho run | s ntp
 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
 --- On Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com wrote:
 
 From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
 To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM
 
 
 Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
 on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
 it sync to a server on stratum 15?
 
 Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)
 
 --
 Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
 
 FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
 
 Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
 
 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
  looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make the
  Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me when i
  took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set to
  stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC server... I
  was confused  here..
  ntp source Loopback0
  ntp master
  ntp server 157.26.1.100
 
  hq#sho ntp ass
address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
  disp
  *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000   0.000
   0.238
   ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000 2901016
   2.591
   * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ray
final conclusion with the NTP issue.. I found out that if there is no ntp 
master command CUCM will never syn with HQ router.. the moment i added ntp 
master it syns right the way, but Hq is only getting the clock from itself not 
from the UTC.  some one can try this and lets see. I spend the whole day on 
this.. I think the question was set wrong. I would raise a red flag if i see 
this question anywhere.

 142.1.64.254
The NTP service not accessible.


hq#sho ntp st
Clock is synchronized, stratum 16, reference is 157.26.1.100  
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0007 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D220FBD3.3C663F3F (16:22:59.235 SDT Sun Sep 18 2011)
clock offset is -0.0037 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.02808 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 359 sec ago.
hq#sho ntp ass

  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     48     64   377  0.000  -3.764  3.994
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
hq#



From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
To: Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com
Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com; ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


Thank you Michael , lets wait for Ray to check the lab results for this 
Ash


On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

Take a look at this link: 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1001926

The two examples explain when you'll need ntp master.

Hope this helps!
Michael



On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote:

i have read this note but it didn't stated that the router can provide clock 
without master command , in here we have one ntp source in our network which 
is the HQ (from all the network entities ) and HQ is getting clock from 
external NTP , 

Ray , can you please try what guys suggest here ?

Ash



On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

We should not use ntp master on HQ router.  This command is only needed if 
the router cannot reach any NTP source.  Since the HQ router can reach the 
backbone (PSTN) router, it does not require ntp master.

If you look at the link, you'll notice this note:

===
Use this command with extreme caution. It is very 
easy to override valid time sources using this command, especially if a 
low stratum number is configured. Configuring multiple machines in the 
same network with the ntp master command can cause instability in timekeeping 
if the machines do not agree on the time. 
===

Michael



On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all ,

 if we took off the master command we will not be able to sync our internal 
network entities to the HQ router , please feel free to correct me if i am 
wrong ,

the output you gave Ray for the first email and the config say that you 
have added the master command before you synced with the external ntp
and so your internal router got the highest level , 

to get rid of this you can configure the ntp server and then make sure that 
you are synced and then use the master command with lower stratum level 
and this should do the trick for you ,

below the link :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1004877

Ash



On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

i found the issue , i took out the ntp master and then shut down/ no shut 
my f0/0 connecting to the UTC server, and the clock was syncing as below.. 
good




hq#sh ntp ass


  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   
disp
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     63     64   377  0.000 2901006  
3.641
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ 
configured


hq#sho run | s ntp
ntp source Loopback0
ntp server 157.26.1.100
--- On Sat, 9/17/11, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.comwrote:


From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 11:44 PM



Why did you configure your router to be NTP master? When you did that,
on which stratum did your router operate? If it was less than 15, will
it sync to a server on stratum 15?

Answer these questions and you'll know the answer to yours :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 18:14, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
 looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Justin Barksdale
NTP is by nature slow.  An earlier post pointed out the correct method.  If the 
question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then the ntp 
master command will break this requirement.  All that is required on the HQ 
router is ntp server x.x.x.x

This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco documentation.  
The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to override 
a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous.  As long as the 
ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source then the hq 
router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the ntp master 
command.

Justin Barksdale
CCIE# 29866
Voice

Sent from my iPhone 4.  Please excuse any typos.

On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:

 Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-18 Thread Ray
reboot the CUCM and the HQ and see if they still syn again.. let me know.. I 
had to reboot after each test and see if it can still syn..



From: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com
To: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp


No trouble getting this CUCM publisher to sync with a router running only the 
ntp server command.  Here is the output of the HQ router that is syncing via 
the PSTN router with the ntp server 10.10.100.2 command.  Then you can see that 
the CUCM is sycn'd to the HQ router and again that router does not have the ntp 
master command.  

HQ-RTR#show ntp status
Clock is synchronized, stratum 5, reference is 10.10.100.2   
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 249.9642 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D2211AD5.E25CC1BA (01:35:17.884 UTC Mon Sep 19 2011)
clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.02 msec, peer dispersion is 0.01 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is 0.000143188 s/s
system poll interval is 1024, last update was 419 sec ago.
HQ-RTR#show run | inc ntp
ntp server 10.10.100.2
HQ-RTR#

Here is the CUCM getting NTP time from the HQ router on an Ethernet port

admin:utils ntp status
ntpd (pid 6982) is running...

 remote   refid  st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==
*192.168.0.90    10.10.100.2  5 u   24   64    1    1.356   -0.254   0.018


synchronised to NTP server (192.168.0.90) at stratum 6 
   time correct to within 30 ms
   polling server every 64 s

Current time in UTC is : Mon Sep 19 01:41:41 UTC 2011
Current time in America/Chicago is : Sun Sep 18 20:41:41 CDT 2011
admin:

So maybe there is something else going on but I have never had any trouble 
getting my CUCM to sync to a router even when it is only running ntp server.



On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

final conclusion with the NTP issue.. I found out that if there is no ntp 
master command CUCM will never syn with HQ router.. the moment i added ntp 
master it syns right the way, but Hq is only getting the clock from itself not 
from the UTC.  some one can try this and lets see. I spend the whole day on 
this.. I think the question was set wrong. I would raise a red flag if i see 
this question anywhere.


 142.1.64.254
The NTP service not accessible.


hq#sho ntp st
Clock is synchronized, stratum 16, reference is 157.26.1.100  
nominal freq is 250. Hz, actual freq is 250.0007 Hz, precision is 2**24
reference time is D220FBD3.3C663F3F (16:22:59.235 SDT Sun Sep 18 2011)
clock offset is -0.0037 msec, root delay is 0.00 msec
root dispersion is 0.01 msec, peer dispersion is 0.00 msec
loopfilter state is 'CTRL' (Normal Controlled Loop), drift is -0.02808 s/s
system poll interval is 64, last update was 359 sec ago.
hq#sho ntp ass


  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
*~157.26.1.100    127.127.1.1     15     48     64   377  0.000  -3.764  3.994
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured
hq#




From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com
To: Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com
Cc: Ray jonha...@yahoo.com; ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 10:21 AM

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp



Thank you Michael , lets wait for Ray to check the lab results for this 
Ash


On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

Take a look at this link: 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/configfun/configuration/guide/fcd303.html#wp1001926

The two examples explain when you'll need ntp master.

Hope this helps!
Michael



On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote:

i have read this note but it didn't stated that the router can provide clock 
without master command , in here we have one ntp source in our network which 
is the HQ (from all the network entities ) and HQ is getting clock from 
external NTP , 

Ray , can you please try what guys suggest here ?

Ash



On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

We should not use ntp master on HQ router.  This command is only needed if 
the router cannot reach any NTP source.  Since the HQ router can reach the 
backbone (PSTN) router, it does not require ntp master.

If you look at the link, you'll notice this note:

===
Use this command with extreme caution. It is very 
easy to override valid time sources using this command, especially if a 
low stratum number is configured. Configuring multiple machines in the 
same network with the ntp master command can cause instability in timekeeping 
if the machines do not agree on the time. 
===

Michael



On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all ,

 if we took

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-17 Thread Ray
looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make the Hq 
router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me when i took 
the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set to stratum 
15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC server... I was 
confused  here..

ntp source Loopback0
ntp master
ntp server 157.26.1.100


hq#sho ntp ass

  address         ref clock       st   when   poll reach  delay  offset   disp
*~127.127.1.1     .LOCL.           7     12     16   377  0.000   0.000  0.238
 ~157.26.1.100    78.85.76.76     16     34     64   376  0.000 2901016  2.591
 * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~ configured___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2011-09-17 Thread Bill Lake
You might want to refrain from asking exact questions from the real exam.

That said your issue is that you used two types of sync, one is to sync to
an external source with the ntp server command and the internal clock source
with ntp master.  Since the internal clock source is local it will sync's
faster than to the network source of the remote router and you will never
learn the stratum of the network clock source.

You could just use the ntp server command and it will allow other devices to
sync to it without the ntp master command.  Give it a try in your next lab.



On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 i had this wierd question in my real exams... they ask me to syn my NTP
 from the UTC server with the HQ. so i type the following command at the HQ
 router
 clock time pst -8
 clock summer-time PDT recurring
 ntp server 157.26.1.253
 ntp master


 then i did the show NTp association command. i found out that the clock was
 syncing with the HQ router itself not the UTC server. because the UTC server
 has the highest stratum of 16. so I didn't know how to make it syn the clock
 from the UTC server. any ideal is welcome.

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp

2011-09-17 Thread Bill Lake
Have you tried removing the following commands

no ntp source loopback 0
no ntp master

Then set the clock on HQ to as close as you can to the UTC server.

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:

 looking at the sho ntp ass below and the config below. I could not make the
 Hq router syn its time from 1567.26.1.100. this question troubled me when i
 took the exams. any idea!!!.. the UTC server at 157.26.1.100 was set to
 stratum 15 i think... so how can u make HQ syn time from the UTC server... I
 was confused  here..

 ntp source Loopback0
 ntp master
 ntp server 157.26.1.100


 hq#sho ntp ass

   address ref clock   st   when   poll reach  delay  offset
 disp
 *~127.127.1.1 .LOCL.   7 12 16   377  0.000   0.000
  0.238
  ~157.26.1.10078.85.76.76 16 34 64   376  0.000 2901016
  2.591
  * sys.peer, # selected, + candidate, - outlyer, x falseticker, ~
 configured

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP summer time

2011-06-19 Thread Adil Shaikh
Thanks for the clarification.

-adil


On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Cristobal Priego 
cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote:

 i think is just a label,

 EST, EDT or it could be whatever you want

 2011/6/18 Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com

 Hi All,

 Question regarding NTP summer time.

 I configure summertime as per IPexpert material:

 clock timezone EST -8
 clock summer EST recurr

 However, many places i have seen this to be configured as:

 clock timezone EST -8
 clock summer EDT recurr


 Which one shoud be done in exam? Any clue?

 thanks
 -adil

 --
   .. . .
 _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com

 . .



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com





-- 
  .. . .
_7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com

. .
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP summer time

2011-06-18 Thread Adil Shaikh
Hi All,

Question regarding NTP summer time.

I configure summertime as per IPexpert material:

clock timezone EST -8
clock summer EST recurr

However, many places i have seen this to be configured as:

clock timezone EST -8
clock summer EDT recurr


Which one shoud be done in exam? Any clue?

thanks
-adil

-- 
  .. . .
_7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com

. .
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP summer time

2011-06-18 Thread Cristobal Priego
personally
i do
EST, EDT
or
PST, PDT



2011/6/18 Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com

 i think is just a label,

 EST, EDT or it could be whatever you want

 2011/6/18 Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com

 Hi All,

 Question regarding NTP summer time.

 I configure summertime as per IPexpert material:

 clock timezone EST -8
 clock summer EST recurr

 However, many places i have seen this to be configured as:

 clock timezone EST -8
 clock summer EDT recurr


 Which one shoud be done in exam? Any clue?

 thanks
 -adil

 --
   .. . .
 _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com

 . .



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP summer time

2011-06-18 Thread Bill Lake
Clock timezone PST -8 would set the time to -8 hours from GMT and the PST
stands for Pacific Standard Time.

clock summer-time PDT recurring would add the hour used for Daylight savings
time, in this case Pacific Daylight Time

The only issue on this is knowing that they changed the dates this is active
so you could be in trouble if your graded and the IOS does not do this
properly automatically like it should.  So recently in the US the start and
end of Daylight Savings Time has changed and I do not believe that is
reflected in the IOS used in the lab.  Therefore you might want to know how
to change dates to the proper ones before taking the exam.

So for EST in US

clock summer-time EDT recurring 2 SUN Mar 02:00 first SUN Nov 02:00



On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 Question regarding NTP summer time.

 I configure summertime as per IPexpert material:

 clock timezone EST -8
 clock summer EST recurr

 However, many places i have seen this to be configured as:

 clock timezone EST -8
 clock summer EDT recurr


 Which one shoud be done in exam? Any clue?

 thanks
 -adil

 --
   .. . .
 _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com

 . .



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP summer time

2011-06-18 Thread Rrcrumm
I think it is a typo

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 18, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,
  
 Question regarding NTP summer time.
  
 I configure summertime as per IPexpert material:
  
 clock timezone EST -8
 clock summer EST recurr
  
 However, many places i have seen this to be configured as:
  
 clock timezone EST -8
 clock summer EDT recurr
  
  
 Which one shoud be done in exam? Any clue?
  
 thanks
 -adil
 
 -- 
   .. . .
 _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com   

 . .
  
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Concept

2011-06-17 Thread sandeep.raman
Hi ,

If  the question says HQ-RTR should be synchronised with external NTP server.

CUCM should be synchronised with HQ-RTR's Loopback0 or VLAN interface.

My config on HQ RTR looks like :



ntp server x.x.x.x external ntp server

ntp source loopback0

clock timezone 

clock summertime  recurring



For BR1 RTR there is no mention in the question about wherei should synchronise 
the NTP, should i synchronise it with external NTP?



Lets assume for BR1 i configure NTP as HQ RTR's Loopback 0 interface.Should i 
configure ntp source loopback 0 ?



For BR 2 RTR there is no mention in the question about where i should 
synchronise the NTP, should i synchronise it with external NTP or can i 
synchronise it with the HQ RTR loopback IP?



Need For NTP master on HQ-RTR is as below:



If question says i need to configure NTP as HQ RTR loopback for CUE



When i configure HQ-RTR (loopback 0) as the NTP server for CUE module, i would 
have to configure HQ RTR as an NTP master right?



Can i configure CUE NTP as CME IP address, if yes in what instances can i 
configure it?






Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. 

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email. 

www.wipro.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Concept

2011-06-17 Thread Cristobal Priego
if they don't tell you to configure NTP on Branch 1 is up to you
if they're saying to source it from the loopback then issue the command
ntp source loopback0 if they don't tell you anything is up to you

you can use the CUE as an NTP, indeed is the default
you can also use the HQ-RTR as an NTP source, in that case the ntp master
command will be needed

2011/6/17 sandeep.ra...@wipro.com

  Hi ,

 If  the question says HQ-RTR should be synchronised with external NTP
 server.

 CUCM should be synchronised with HQ-RTR's Loopback0 or VLAN interface.

 My config on HQ RTR looks like :



 ntp server x.x.x.x external ntp server

 ntp source loopback0

 clock timezone 

 clock summertime  recurring



 For BR1 RTR there is no mention in the question about wherei should
 synchronise the NTP, should i synchronise it with external NTP?



 Lets assume for BR1 i configure NTP as HQ RTR's Loopback 0 interface.Should
 i configure ntp source loopback 0 ?



 For BR 2 RTR there is no mention in the question about where i should
 synchronise the NTP, should i synchronise it with external NTP or can i
 synchronise it with the HQ RTR loopback IP?



 Need For NTP master on HQ-RTR is as below:



 If question says i need to configure NTP as HQ RTR loopback for CUE



 When i configure HQ-RTR (loopback 0) as the NTP server for CUE module, i
 would have to configure HQ RTR as an NTP master right?



 Can i configure CUE NTP as CME IP address, if yes in what instances can i
 configure it?





 * Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. *

 The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
 this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
 contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not
 the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
 e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
 message and any attachments.

 WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
 should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
 company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted
 by this email.

 www.wipro.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-03 Thread Bartosz Sokolowski
Hi,

Any good way to figure out if any timezone has summer time using resources
available on the lab?
As I live in Europe I really don't know how it looks in Asia for example...
-- 
Regards,
Bartosz

2011/6/3 Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es

  Hi,



 For US you need configure



 HQ

 Ntp server xx.xx.xx.xx

 Clock timezone pst -8

 Clock summertime pst recurring



 For Honkong

 Ntp server xx.xx.xx.xx

 Clock timezone hkg 8

  Do no use recurring,  China does not have savelight



 Verify the time the phones get checking the real time and the timezones



 http://www.worldtimeserver.com/













 Francesc Xavier Roig Borrell

 Network Senior Consultant

 Integración de Sistemas y Tecnología

 C/Santander, 49-51

 Barcelona 08020

 Tel. Fijo: (+34) 934965108 ext 64697

 Tel. Móvil / Fax: (+34) 647 32 21 55 (24697) / (+34) 934965161

 email: francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es

 http://www.tecnocom.es



 *Por favor, antes de imprimir este mensaje, asegúrate de que es necesario.
 Ayudemos a cuidar el medio ambiente*

 *Este mensaje puede contener información confidencial o privilegiada. Si
 le ha llegado por error, rogamos no haga uso del mismo, avise al remitente y
 bórrelo. **Consulte **aviso 
 legalhttp://www.tecnocom.es/Paginas/InformacionLegal.aspx
 *
 *This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If it
 has been sent to you in error, please do not use it, notify the sender of
 the error and delete it. **See **legal 
 noticehttp://www.tecnocom.es/sites/en/Paginas/InformacionLegal.aspx
 *



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

image001.jpg___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-02 Thread Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier
Hi,

For US you need configure

HQ
Ntp server xx.xx.xx.xx
Clock timezone pst -8
Clock summertime pst recurring

For Honkong
Ntp server xx.xx.xx.xx
Clock timezone hkg 8
 Do no use recurring,  China does not have savelight

Verify the time the phones get checking the real time and the timezones

http://www.worldtimeserver.com/






[cid:image001.jpg@01CC2181.42F82C00]
Francesc Xavier Roig Borrell
Network Senior Consultant
Integración de Sistemas y Tecnología
C/Santander, 49-51
Barcelona 08020
Tel. Fijo: (+34) 934965108 ext 64697
Tel. Móvil / Fax: (+34) 647 32 21 55 (24697) / (+34) 934965161
email: francesc.ro...@tecnocom.esmailto:francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es
http://www.tecnocom.eshttp://www.tecnocom.es/

Por favor, antes de imprimir este mensaje, asegúrate de que es necesario. 
Ayudemos a cuidar el medio ambiente
Este mensaje puede contener información confidencial o privilegiada. Si le ha 
llegado por error, rogamos no haga uso del mismo, avise al remitente y bórrelo. 
Consulte aviso legalhttp://www.tecnocom.es/Paginas/InformacionLegal.aspx
This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If it has been 
sent to you in error, please do not use it, notify the sender of the error and 
delete it. See legal 
noticehttp://www.tecnocom.es/sites/en/Paginas/InformacionLegal.aspx

inline: image001.jpg___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-02 Thread Cristobal Priego
will it be also valid to use the command

ntp source lo0 for example ?
or if you use the command above you risk the points ?

2011/6/2 Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu

  Check the time-zone they ask for and if this time-zone contains a
 daylight saving time (compare to the geographical sites), you have to put
 the clock summertime command as well.

 If this site doesn’t contain a Daylight Saving Time, not necessary to put
 this command ….. Normally you gonna find out on which site you have to ….



 Regards,



 [image: netcore_signature_4.jpg]





 *Claude FRIDERICH *

 PreSales Voice over IP

 * ***

 *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]*

  CCIE Voice #29035

 *O*ffice**

 +352 31 33 80 – 407**

 *M*obile **

 +352 621 303 616**

 [image: cid:image003.jpg@01CC1F87.400817E0]

 *F*ax  **

 +352 31 33 80 412

 *E*mail**

 *cfrider...@netcore.lu x...@netcore.lu***





 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton
 *Sent:* jeudi 2 juin 2011 02:32

 *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab



 When I took the test last time I used the clock timezone command and the
 ntp server command to setup ntp.  I did not get points for this question.

 If the question on the Lab doesn't say anything about clock summertime,
 should we throw the command in anyway on the routers?  I know clock
 summertime without any options uses US daylight savings time dates, but not
 sure if those would apply to other timezones as well.  As best I can tell,
 I've heard of Hong Kong and UK and US as sites.

 Regards,
 Adam Compton



 --

 This email was Anti Virus checked.


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

image003.jpgimage004.jpgimage001.jpg___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-02 Thread Ki Wi
Does it do anything without filling in the start date and end date?

2011/6/3 Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es

  Hi,



 For US you need configure



 HQ

 Ntp server xx.xx.xx.xx

 Clock timezone pst -8

 Clock summertime pst recurring



 For Honkong

 Ntp server xx.xx.xx.xx

 Clock timezone hkg 8

  Do no use recurring,  China does not have savelight



 Verify the time the phones get checking the real time and the timezones



 http://www.worldtimeserver.com/













 Francesc Xavier Roig Borrell

 Network Senior Consultant

 Integración de Sistemas y Tecnología

 C/Santander, 49-51

 Barcelona 08020

 Tel. Fijo: (+34) 934965108 ext 64697

 Tel. Móvil / Fax: (+34) 647 32 21 55 (24697) / (+34) 934965161

 email: francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es

 http://www.tecnocom.es



 *Por favor, antes de imprimir este mensaje, asegúrate de que es necesario.
 Ayudemos a cuidar el medio ambiente*

 *Este mensaje puede contener información confidencial o privilegiada. Si
 le ha llegado por error, rogamos no haga uso del mismo, avise al remitente y
 bórrelo. **Consulte **aviso 
 legalhttp://www.tecnocom.es/Paginas/InformacionLegal.aspx
 *
 *This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If it
 has been sent to you in error, please do not use it, notify the sender of
 the error and delete it. **See **legal 
 noticehttp://www.tecnocom.es/sites/en/Paginas/InformacionLegal.aspx
 *



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

image001.jpg___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
When I took the test last time I used the clock timezone command and the ntp
server command to setup ntp.  I did not get points for this question.

If the question on the Lab doesn't say anything about clock summertime,
should we throw the command in anyway on the routers?  I know clock
summertime without any options uses US daylight savings time dates, but not
sure if those would apply to other timezones as well.  As best I can tell,
I've heard of Hong Kong and UK and US as sites.

Regards,
Adam Compton
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:43 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:

 I had bad luck asking the proctor last time around.  I told them I
 interpret wording that SCCP is used for registration and he just blew me off
 with whatever it says.  i watch ipexpert and they say ask the proctor ask
 the proctor.  Unless it's a typo, I don't think you are getting any help
 from the proctor in understanding a question.  At least in RTP


 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:

 did 'show ntp status' showed synchronization?

 regarding summertime, i think it would be worth asking proctor.

 -adil

 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:32 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:

 When I took the test last time I used the clock timezone command and the
 ntp server command to setup ntp.  I did not get points for this question.

 If the question on the Lab doesn't say anything about clock summertime,
 should we throw the command in anyway on the routers?  I know clock
 summertime without any options uses US daylight savings time dates, but not
 sure if those would apply to other timezones as well.  As best I can tell,
 I've heard of Hong Kong and UK and US as sites.

 Regards,
 Adam Compton

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




 --
   .. . .
 _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com

 . .




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab

2011-06-01 Thread Randall Crumm
I haven't taken the lab yet but I would agree and only think the proctor can 
help if you are having a HW issue, informix Database issue or something like 
that

rc 



From: adam compton com...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2011 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab





On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:43 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:

I had bad luck asking the proctor last time around.  I told them I interpret 
wording that SCCP is used for registration and he just blew me off with 
whatever it says.  i watch ipexpert and they say ask the proctor ask the 
proctor.  Unless it's a typo, I don't think you are getting any help from the 
proctor in understanding a question.  At least in RTP



On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:

did 'show ntp status' showed synchronization?
 
regarding summertime, i think it would be worth asking proctor. 
 
-adil


On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:32 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:

When I took the test last time I used the clock timezone command and the ntp 
server command to setup ntp.  I did not get points for this question.

If the question on the Lab doesn't say anything about clock summertime, 
should we throw the command in anyway on the routers?  I know clock 
summertime without any options uses US daylight savings time dates, but not 
sure if those would apply to other timezones as well.  As best I can tell, 
I've heard of Hong Kong and UK and US as sites.

Regards,
Adam Compton

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com



-- 

  .    . . .
_7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com 
 
    . .
 



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP server

2011-02-10 Thread Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier
You don't need 3 ntp refrences in CCM, in fact a you do not need to configure 
any ntp reference unless you have SIP phones. In this case one NTP reference 
pointing to HQ (ntp server)
For SCCP phone you need to synchronize the PUB with HQ router, different date 
time groups will define the offset for the sites

Francesc

De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] En nombre de voice boy
Enviado el: miércoles, 09 de febrero de 2011 5:47
Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Asunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP server

Hi,

- If we have cucm that have 3-sites registered in 3-different countries
each have its own time zone,so I made the HQ router as ntp master and the other 
two as ntp clients
On the call manager,I'll create 3-date time groups. Do I need to create 3-ntp 
references [one for each site]
or only one ntp reference with the HQ master ip.add and select this for the 
3-date time groups

- Then what should be needed as ntp server inthe OS page

- Also I found authentication command ntp authentication
Why I would need this

Thanks

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP server

2011-02-08 Thread voice boy

Hi,
 
- If we have cucm that have 3-sites registered in 3-different countries
each have its own time zone,so I made the HQ router as ntp master and the other 
two as ntp clients
On the call manager,I'll create 3-date time groups. Do I need to create 3-ntp 
references [one for each site]
or only one ntp reference with the HQ master ip.add and select this for the 
3-date time groups

- Then what should be needed as ntp server inthe OS page
 
- Also I found authentication command ntp authentication
Why I would need this
 
Thanks
  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2010-07-09 Thread bkvalent...@gmail.com
A router that has ntp server configured also acts as a server.  You don't 
need ntp master to act as a server.

Brian

- Reply message -
From: cisco voip voip.ccieci...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 10:42 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP
To: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
Cc: OSL osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


But ntp master command is necessary for the router to be able to be ntp
server for anyone else. i agree about stratum chain, but without ntp master
command publisher should not be able to get its clock.

you can check show ntp associations on the router, after ntp master command
only it will show you the local interface.

now if you want to use the stratum to be 1 more from whatever the stratum is
on actual source, you do not need stratum command, for anything else you
need that commnd

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:

 Cool, thanks Graham and Randall.

 On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Graham Hopkins wrote:

  Default stratum is 8 so a simple ntp master will work
 
  Graham
 
  On 8 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
 
  Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X
 
  On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
 
  If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server
 x.x.x.x command to sync time from another source, but I want another device
 (such as PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to
 configure the HQ router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get
 the time sync from HQ without the stratum command?
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2010-07-09 Thread Pulos, Greg
To identify the most accurate stratum, think of the stratum as the number of 
'hops' from the master time source.

ie: your publisher server is sync'd to your internal router; your internal 
router is sync'd to your Internet router; your Internet router is sync'd to a 
master time source on the net; that's three stratum 'hops' right there.

A lowest 'root' master time source would use stratum 0.

ie: Master = stratum 0  internet router = stratum 1  internal router = 
stratum 2  publisher = stratum 3

At this point, any device syncing to the publisher would use stratum 4. (or 
higher)
Any device syncing to the internal router would use stratum 3 (or 
higher)etc.

(of course, your internet router may or may not sync to a stratum 0 master; it 
could be a higher stratum which in that case you'd increment your stratum 
numbers down the line appropriately)

greg


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
bkvalent...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 7:07 AM
To: cisco voip; Mark Holloway
Cc: OSL osl
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

A router that has ntp server configured also acts as a server.  You don't 
need ntp master to act as a server.

Brian

- Reply message -
From: cisco voip voip.ccieci...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 10:42 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP
To: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
Cc: OSL osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


But ntp master command is necessary for the router to be able to be ntp 
server for anyone else. i agree about stratum chain, but without ntp master 
command publisher should not be able to get its clock.

you can check show ntp associations on the router, after ntp master command 
only it will show you the local interface.

now if you want to use the stratum to be 1 more from whatever the stratum is on 
actual source, you do not need stratum command, for anything else you need that 
commnd

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:

 Cool, thanks Graham and Randall.

 On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Graham Hopkins wrote:

  Default stratum is 8 so a simple ntp master will work
 
  Graham
 
  On 8 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
 
  Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X
 
  On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
 
  If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server
 x.x.x.x command to sync time from another source, but I want another 
 device (such as PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also 
 need to configure the HQ router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM 
 simply get the time sync from HQ without the stratum command?
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2010-07-08 Thread Mark Holloway
If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server x.x.x.x 
command to sync time from another source, but I want another device (such as 
PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to configure the HQ 
router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get the time sync from HQ 
without the stratum command?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2010-07-08 Thread Mark Holloway
Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X

On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:

 If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server x.x.x.x 
 command to sync time from another source, but I want another device (such as 
 PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to configure the HQ 
 router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get the time sync from 
 HQ without the stratum command?
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2010-07-08 Thread Graham Hopkins
Default stratum is 8 so a simple ntp master will work

Graham

On 8 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:

 Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X
 
 On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
 
 If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server x.x.x.x 
 command to sync time from another source, but I want another device (such as 
 PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to configure the HQ 
 router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get the time sync from 
 HQ without the stratum command?
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2010-07-08 Thread Randall Saborio
You don't need to use ntp master on the gateway.

The ntp servers work like in a chain and the higher up on the
hierarchy, the lower the stratum.

So if router synchs to ntp stratum 3, it becomes stratum 4 for the
callmanager. The Pub is Stratum 5 for the Subscriber.

CUCM won't do ntp with an ntp server that has stratum 10 or higher.

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
 Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X

 On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:

 If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server x.x.x.x 
 command to sync time from another source, but I want another device (such as 
 PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to configure the HQ 
 router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get the time sync from 
 HQ without the stratum command?
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com




-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
(Real number coming this July 2010)
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2010-07-08 Thread Mark Holloway
Cool, thanks Graham and Randall.

On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Graham Hopkins wrote:

 Default stratum is 8 so a simple ntp master will work
 
 Graham
 
 On 8 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
 
 Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X
 
 On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
 
 If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server x.x.x.x 
 command to sync time from another source, but I want another device (such 
 as PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to configure the 
 HQ router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get the time sync 
 from HQ without the stratum command?
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP

2010-07-08 Thread cisco voip
But ntp master command is necessary for the router to be able to be ntp
server for anyone else. i agree about stratum chain, but without ntp master
command publisher should not be able to get its clock.

you can check show ntp associations on the router, after ntp master command
only it will show you the local interface.

now if you want to use the stratum to be 1 more from whatever the stratum is
on actual source, you do not need stratum command, for anything else you
need that commnd

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:

 Cool, thanks Graham and Randall.

 On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Graham Hopkins wrote:

  Default stratum is 8 so a simple ntp master will work
 
  Graham
 
  On 8 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
 
  Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X
 
  On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
 
  If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server
 x.x.x.x command to sync time from another source, but I want another device
 (such as PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to
 configure the HQ router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get
 the time sync from HQ without the stratum command?
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

2010-06-11 Thread Pavan K
When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when asked to
configure NTP.

Which way would you go ?


- Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
Involved)

- Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster  Seems
to work)
   (Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app is
synced)


-- 
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

2010-06-11 Thread Tanner Ezell
Use the IP Address of your CUCM Publisher (as it runs an NTP server).

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Pavan K pav.c...@gmail.com wrote:
 When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when asked to
 configure NTP.
 Which way would you go ?

 - Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
 Involved)
 - Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster  Seems
 to work)
    (Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app is
 synced)

 --
 - Pavan

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com





-- 
Cheers,

Tanner Ezell
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

2010-06-11 Thread Pavan K
you would also need clock timezone and summertime (if asked)


On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Dani Bug daniyal.vo...@gmail.com wrote:

 go with option 2 NTP UCCX
 also i just want to confirm in NTP on R1 R2 and R3 which commands we
 required lab perspective view ...

 ntp server x.x.x.x
 wht else command we required to configure 

 Thx
 Dani

 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Pavan K pav.c...@gmail.com wrote:

 When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when asked
 to configure NTP.

 Which way would you go ?


 - Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
 Involved)

 - Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster  Seems
 to work)
(Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app is
 synced)


 --
 - Pavan

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com





-- 
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


  1   2   >