RE: IP Subnetting Question
As phil has said mate, it is in the question! They have probably asked how many bits of subnetting are being used in which case the answer is perfectly correct. You are giving the answer as the full mask = natural mask + subnet mask -Original Message-From: Robert Cabeca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 17 October 2000 18:00To: cisco group studySubject: IP Subnetting Question I am not understanding the concept of using an IP address followed by /n. Example 10.20.193.20 /28. The way I am looking at it I get a Subnet mask of 255.255.255.240. But I am being told that it is really a mask of 255.255.240.0, however I am not being given an explanation. I thought that 255.255.240.0 has a /20. but it is a /12 instead? Any enlightenment would be appreciated. peace Rob
Re: [Re: External & Internal BGP]
Hi Wandoo, Thanks for the info, Can you please describe this in detail with some example. Thanks. Faisal. ElephantChild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 18 Oct 2000, FAISAL ATHAR wrote: > Can any one explain the purpose of Internal BGP.According to my knowledge it > it used between sites with in the same autonomous system. True, assuming you mean routers. > But Question is that BGP is Exterior routing protocol,develop mainly to > connect two different autonomous systems, then what is the purpose of Using > Internal BGP, within the same autonomous sytems although we could use any > other Interior routing protocol there. You need internal BGP to carry path information between external BGP routers, eg for a transit AS. -- Bungee jumping and skydiving are for wimps. If you want to experience true gut-wrenching terror, have children. --Dusty Rhoades. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suche: CISCO 1005 Router
Bitte um Angebot ! Herzlichen Dank Colt Telecom Austria GmbH Hans Schimek NCC & Installation Technician Tel.: +43 (1) 20500-315 Kärtner Ring 12 Fax.: +43 (1) 20500-399 A-1010 Wien Mobil.: +43 (699) 10605-315 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Contract opportunities
Role- CCIE 3rd Line Helpdesk Support Term- Contract Rate- £market rate Job - My client, a Cisco Gold Partner requires a CCIE certified Cisco guru to provide 3rd Line Support to existing Helpdesk. The role is Senior position and will be providing design solutions to problems highlighted on Client sites by helpdesk. Candidate will liaise with Clients and Cisco direct to resolve problems at a CCIE level. Candidate must have at least 3 years technical hands-on knowledge of Cisco Networks. Reply - [EMAIL PROTECTED] My user name for GroupStudy.com is MarkT Regards Mark Thomas Network Sales Consultant 01892 525260 07765 880949 __ Mark Thomas Xpert IT Recruitment Limited 3rd Floor, Abbey Court, St Johns Road, Tunbridge Wells TN4 9TE T: +44 (0) 1892 525260 F: +44 (0) 1892 517942 The contents of this email and any attached files are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete this email. Xpert IT Recruitment Limited is registered in England No. 2897012 Registered Office: 3 Boyne Park, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN4 8EN _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCSE opportunities
Role- CCSE Firewall Support Manager / Trainer Term- Contract Rate- £market rate Job - My Client a Managed Firewall Service Provider/CheckpointFirewall-1 (CCSE) training body requires an experienced Firewall Support Manager to support, configure and install CheckpointFirewall-1 for managed service. In addition the role will involve providing training on in-house CCSE course as an Instructor. Candidate must be CCSE certified and ALL instructor training will be provided. Candidate must have at least 3 years experience hands-on with CheckpointFirewall-1 in Cisco or NT Networks. Reply - [EMAIL PROTECTED] My user name for GroupStudy.com is MarkT Regards Mark Thomas Network Sales Consultant 01892 525260 07765 880949 __ Mark Thomas Xpert IT Recruitment Limited 3rd Floor, Abbey Court, St Johns Road, Tunbridge Wells TN4 9TE T: +44 (0) 1892 525260 F: +44 (0) 1892 517942 The contents of this email and any attached files are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete this email. Xpert IT Recruitment Limited is registered in England No. 2897012 Registered Office: 3 Boyne Park, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN4 8EN _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
access server can't access the dial in- pls help :(
Dear all, I have configured a access server as shown below, I attach my modem in Asyn 1 port and I can reverse telnet to it and the phone line got no problem. Besides, I used use a PC (win95) with a modem installed. In win95, I use hyperterminal to connect the PC modem and tested the at command,.. it work, so I used atdt 7 (my access server phone no) but I only heard the ring ring tone, the access server never accept it but I can see from the word RING RING on the access server's modem at command console. What should I configure to let the access server modem pick up the call ### interface Ethernet0 ip address 60.200.166.11 255.255.252.0 no logging event subif-link-status ! interface Async1 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 encapsulation ppp no logging event subif-link-status async dynamic address async mode interactive peer default ip address 60.200.166.15 ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 60.200.164.1 permanent ! line con 0 line 1 password abc123 autoselect ppp login modem InOut transport input all stopbits 1 speed 2400 flowcontrol hardware == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't Ping Local Serial Interface of 2610
Trying do a frame-relay map statement that maps dlci no to the ip address of the interface you are trying to ping suaveguru --- "Claussen, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to setup a Frame Relay link in a lab > situation. We have Layer 2 > speaking LMI back and forth and the line Protocol is > reported as Up on the > serial interface. We assigned it a Private address > and created a static > route pointing at the serial interface of the other > router. When you do a > Show ip route it reports that all the routes exist > as I believe they should > (See config to follow) The Problem is we can't ping > the IP address of the > local serial interface 192.168.4.1, and I can't seem > to figure out why. I > beleive if I could ping the local serial interface > then traffic would pass > from our development network to our test network on > 192.168.3.1. Please > review my config on the 2610 and help me figure out > why I can't ping the > local interface before I use this router as a > frisbee (which would be a > shame considering it is a 2610) > Begin Config > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname cisco2600 > ! > enable password cisco > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > interface Serial0/0 > ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > no ip mroute-cache > frame-relay interface-dlci 101 > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 > ip route 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.4.2 > no ip http server > ! > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit > snmp-server engineID local 0009023094104240 > snmp-server community public RO > ! > line con 0 > exec-timeout 0 0 > password cisco > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password cisco > login > ! > no scheduler allocate > end > cisco2600# > End Config > Please help to save my sanity! all responses are > greatly appreciated! > > > Ken Claussen MCSE CCNA CCA > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: access server can't access the dial in- pls help :(
this is not a RAS problem, it just a modem problem. take its settings to answer at first ring.. its at command is ATS0=1 good luck p.s for easy installation for RAS side use Cisco ConfigMaker. it is free and downloadable at Cisco site. -Original Message- From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:25 PM To: 'ElephantChild'; 'FAISAL ATHAR'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: access server can't access the dial in- pls help :( Dear all, I have configured a access server as shown below, I attach my modem in Asyn 1 port and I can reverse telnet to it and the phone line got no problem. Besides, I used use a PC (win95) with a modem installed. In win95, I use hyperterminal to connect the PC modem and tested the at command,.. it work, so I used atdt 7 (my access server phone no) but I only heard the ring ring tone, the access server never accept it but I can see from the word RING RING on the access server's modem at command console. What should I configure to let the access server modem pick up the call ### interface Ethernet0 ip address 60.200.166.11 255.255.252.0 no logging event subif-link-status ! interface Async1 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 encapsulation ppp no logging event subif-link-status async dynamic address async mode interactive peer default ip address 60.200.166.15 ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 60.200.164.1 permanent ! line con 0 line 1 password abc123 autoselect ppp login modem InOut transport input all stopbits 1 speed 2400 flowcontrol hardware == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDA
Hello I am preparing for my CCDA exam! Can i have some help !!! how many questions, time for the exam !!! how tuff !! what are the main area it concontrates on!! Jayesh Patel CNE(4 & 5),MCP,MCP+I,MCSE,MCNE,CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3rd Floor, Devon House IP Division, NTT Europe Ltd. 58-60 St. Katharine's Way [Tel] +44 20 7977 1182 London E1 9LB, UK [Fax] +44 20 7977 1001 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where can i download a 11.3 IOS for 2501?
is 11.3's IOS' size more than 4M? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: please take my email l.gigante@free.fr off of the Group study list and the Job list... Thanks
- Original Message - From: Laurent GIGANTE To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 9:49 AM Subject: please take my email off of the Group study list and the Job list... Thanks please take my email off of the Group study list and the Job list... Thanks
Fw: please take my email l.gigante@free.fr off of the Group study list and the Job list... Thanks
- Original Message - From: Laurent GIGANTE To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 9:49 AM Subject: please take my email off of the Group study list and the Job list... Thanks please take my email off of the Group study list and the Job list... Thanks
Re: cross-over roll-over : Here is THE simplest rule
take it outside. - Original Message - From: "Jojo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 9:36 AM Subject: Re: cross-over roll-over : Here is THE simplest rule > I dont know with you but I can connect my workstation directly to a modem > Ever heard of a serial port?The reason that you can connect a workstaion > to a LAN devices is that it has LAN device which is the NIC card. And dont > ever tell us that a workstaion is a layer 3 devices cause its not . Does a > workstation ever do routing? Its not even a layer 4, 5, 6, or 7 by itself. > But if you put in the software or hardware that will enable it to do this > things then it can be any of these. > > > >H, let me think. I never thought of that, that someday we will be > >connecting a workstation to a modem with a Cat5 cable. > >Workstation to a modem, ? no the rule does not apply > >How about a TV to a VCR? no, it does not apply neither. > >How about the toaster? nooope. > > > >You are right, that is not a good rule. Don't use it. > > > >Bernard > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 line: the best solution ?
Hi all I have 2 leased line (64kb) one of them working with voice and data and the other one just with data. 2 Cisco routers. I want to set-up these lines to work toghether. Which one is the best solution: router - router | | \-->Multiplexor--Multiplexor
Fw: remove l.gigante@free.fr
- Original Message - From: Laurent GIGANTE To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 3:22 PM Subject: remove Please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from list
Re: "Window" field - TCP packet
Hmm, sounds like I need to dust off my old copy of Visual Studio (and my brain) and bang this utility out. Maybe after I pass the lab. No, then I've got the design lab to prepare for (have you heard anything about that???)... Maybe someone else better do it... Seriously - I agree that it would be a cool tool! I didn't know that EtherPeek would let you capture and view the decode at the same time - that is really cool! I need that now... I better take a look that EtherPeek. Does it run only on a Mac? Dale [=`) >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: "Window" field - TCP packet >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:12:05 -0700 > >Nice answer, Dale. > >Do you think he was literally asking for a utility that would show the >window size as a station was transmitting? That would be quite useful >actually... > >EtherPeek from www.WildPackets.com (used to be AG Group) lets you capture >and display packets at the same time. So you could filter on your station >and its partner and track windows that way. You could see the receive >window rather easily, since it's size is advertised on every segment. The >send window would be harder, requiring an analysis of sequence numbers and >the other side's receive window. > >But I can't think of a utility that graphically shows send and receive >windows for a transmitter. That would be really cool, wouldn't it? > >Priscilla > > >At 03:55 PM 10/17/00, Dale Holmes wrote: >>Each station in a TCP conversation will advertise a window which >>represents the amount of buffer space that the station has available for >>this conversation. The window size of a packet is the buffer available for >>the station that is sending the packet, indicating to the recipient how >>much data to send. >> >>It is called a "sliding window" because it is variable and will change >>throughout the course of the conversation. >> >>For more detail on this, I would look at Douglas Comer's "Internetworking >>with TCP/IP" volume I. >> >>I have not seen a utility that will display the window size during the >>transmission of the packet. A sniffer will display all of the packet >>fields, but only after you have captured the transfer and opted to display >>it (but of course you knew that already)... >> >>Dale >>[=`) >> >> >>>From: "Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: "Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: "Window" field - TCP packet >>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:05:12 -0700 >>> >>>Hello: >>> >>>Is there any way to see the size of the (sliding) window when transmiting >>>a >>>TCP packet ? >>> >>>I saw a "Window" field using a sniffer and the number was big 28765... >>>Please correct me if I am wrong: I believe that is the buffer of the >>>receiving station. >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Ronaldo >>> >>> >>> >>>_ >>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIT
Can someone tell me how the CIT exam is like. How does it compare to the other exams. I glanced over the CIT book and it looks like a lot of stuff is understanding different "show ..." commands and "debug ..." commands. Any hints or advice would be appreciated. Thanks. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATM & CDP
I have a Cisco router connected to a Cisco LightStream 1010 ATM switch. The 'sh int atm 1/0' command shows that the interface and line protocol are up, but I can't ping what I thought was the IP address of the switch's ATM interface(10.11.1.2/24). I know the IP address of the ATM interface on the router (10.11.1.1/24), but I can't figure out the IP address of the switch's ATM interface. Would this address normally show up in the 'show cdp neighbors' command? The output of that command shows nothing for the ATM interface. In the 'sh ip arp' command, there are only Ethernet entries, none for ATM. Also, can you ping over ATM? Obviously I don't know a whole lot about ATM, but I'd appreciate any help anyone can offer. Thanks, Jake __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting T1 controller BACK TO BACK
Rollover cables - (most of the Rj-45 Console cables) 1 - 8 2 - 7 3 - 6 4 - 5 Not a Crossover cable. Original Message Follows From: Ravi Hegde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Ejay Hire' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Connecting T1 controller BACK TO BACK Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:43:05 -0700 What is rollover cable ? ,Is it cross over cable or some thing different -Original Message- From: Ejay Hire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Connecting T1 controller BACK TO BACK IIRC, You can use a rollover cable or make your own with pins 1,2 and 7,8 reversed. Original Message Follows From: "thangs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "thangs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Connecting T1 controller BACK TO BACK Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:10:16 -0500 Can you tell me how to connect the T1 controller back to back (What cabling type is used ?) on Cisco MC3810 ,I want to simulate a back to back VoATM. Regards Thangavel HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD CHENNAI,INDIA _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token ring and duplex
""Ejay Hire"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex settings do not apply in a Token ring environment. > > Duplex settings deterrmine whether or not a system can recieve and transmit > at the smae time in a CSMA/_C_ollision _D_etect (Ethernet) environment. > Token Ring Does not use CSMA/CD, but use token-passing instead. > > On a Token Ring network, only one system transmits at a time, all of the > others listen. I am very sorry, but this is misinformation. Token RIng full duplex support has absolutely nothing to do with the token passing nature of the protocol, still less the CSMA/CD protocol of Ethernet, which is not under discussion at all. Token Ring networks do support the use of full duplex operation if the stations are attached to a switch. Token Ring switches, just like ISDN, ATM, Ethernet and so on, support full duplex operation. -- Edward Solomon CCNA, CCSI Senior I/T Specialist Networking Solutions IBM Canada Ltd. - Learning Services Tel.: (905) 316-3241 Fax: (905) 316-3101 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.can.ibm.com/services/learning/net_internet.html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Optimizing link
If your utilization is below 40% don't touch it. Above 40% and you start looking at things like Priority or Custom queuing, reducing bandwidth used by unnecessary routing updates or keepalives, reducing unnecessary trafic accross the wan Link (Cached Name resolution on the router...) Then there are some gains (at a cost of higher latency) by usinig TCP Header compression and Data Compression, but both of these require more processing power in the router. (That's all I can think of without more specifics.) Oh, and if you're using TDM to share the line with voice traffic, you can consolidate with a couple of ATM switches., and make the Voice traffic "Share" it's wasted bandwidth Original Message Follows From: "net974 at Yahoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "net974 at Yahoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Optimizing link Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 04:50:13 +0530 Hi, What are the possible ways through which we can otimize the link and use maximum out of a leased line. TIA Gm _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: COLT tests
Yes, If the COLT tests were tires, I'm afraid they would be Firestone Wilderness series...complete with the deflating effect (Sorry, couldn't help it). Lance >From: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT tests >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:46:10 CDT > >Thank God its not just me. I took 2 of the Colts as a pre-assesment for >taking BCSN, and thought I had no chance of ever passing the real thing and >should learn to change tires instead!! I feel a lot better knowing that >they really are as awful as I thought they were. > >Whew! >-Ejay > > >Original Message Follows >From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT tests >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:27:34 PDT > >I think I have to agree. > >I took the CCDA COLT test yesterday, and to my dismay, despite using the >book for occational referance I missed 12 out of 52. The questions I >missed >were many of the questions I looked up in the book (DCN Cisco Press). The >test contradicts the book often, and several times questions have multiple >correct answers, not in which there is a "best answer" but there are >literaly several 100% correct answers for each question, and you are >allowed >to pick just one. It did open my eyes to some problem areas for me, but >this is not a route I would go for legitimate readiness evaluation. > >Cheers, > >Lance > > >>From: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:43:56 -0500 >> >>COLT testsMy opinion of them is that they only confuse the issue. I >>counted >>over 15 questions on the CIT-Pre exam that either had no correct answers >>listed or had wrong answers; I even took the test OPEN-BOOK to try to get >>through it. There is a very good reason that these questions are not on >>the >>real exam (badly-worded questions, no correct choices, nebulous questions, >>badly-worded answers, questions so detailed and obscure that they require >>a >>Cisco white paper or field notice to answer, etc.), and no one has made >>any >>attempt to improve them. What is amazing about some of them is that they >>are direct mis-quotes from some of the Cisco-Press books, and some were >>paraphrased incorrectly and unintentionally changed the meaning. It is my >>belief that these questions were not written by Cisco but rather some >>hired >>third-party who didn't understand the material they were asking about >>(let's hope that this is the case, or else they are a real embarrassment >>to >>Cisco!). I had to inform Cisco that the CIT-8/28 exam wasn't even showing >>the gifs (they have since fixed that at least). Don't use this resourse to >>make a decision on whether you are ready for the real exam, just use it as >>a reference to make sure that you have covered the material. The real exam >>has a few nebulous questions, but not to the extent that the assessment >>exams do. >> >>Regards, >>MLC >> "Lonnie Paschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> They are practice beta exams that are avaialable to cco login users. No >>charge, excellent rescource! >> "Ricardo Ciganda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01">news:C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01... >> Hi all! >> >> I would like to know what is the finality of the COLT tests. May I >>have to paid for this or is only a simulation of a test? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Ricardo Ciganda >> Dpto. de Sistemas >> Bytemaster Servicios Informaticos S.A. >> > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token ring and duplex
Okay,now I'm Confuzzled. A Token ring Frame is timed so that the first bit of a MTU sized frame returns to the Sending station immediately after the last bit was transmitted. Then It checks the error/received bits and strips it off the ring. How could it work full duplex unless there were two tokens on the ring? Original Message Follows From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:59:22 -0700 The Dedicated Token Ring port adapter (PA-4R-DTR) is available on Cisco 7500 series routers, Cisco 7200 series routers, and Cisco 7000 series routers with the 7000 Series Route Switch Processor (RSP7000) and 7000 Series Chassis Interface (RSP7000CI). The PA-4R-DTR provides up to four IBM Token Ring or IEEE 802.5 Token Ring interfaces. Each Token Ring interface can be set for 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps half-duplex or full-duplex operation and can operate as a standard Token Ring station or as a concentrator port. The default for all interfaces is Token Ring station mode with half-duplex 16-Mbps operation. The PA-4R-DTR connects over Type 1 lobe or Type 3 lobe cables, with each interface providing an RJ-45 receptacle. So, Token Ring does have a "full-duplex" operation. I guess you would use it on back-to-back links, just like you use full-duplex Ethernet on back-to-back links. Priscilla At 05:13 PM 10/17/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex settings do not apply in a Token ring environment. > >Duplex settings deterrmine whether or not a system can recieve and >transmit at the smae time in a CSMA/_C_ollision _D_etect (Ethernet) >environment. >Token Ring Does not use CSMA/CD, but use token-passing instead. > >On a Token Ring network, only one system transmits at a time, all of the >others listen. > > >Original Message Follows >From: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Token ring and duplex >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:07:16 GMT > >If a token ring is running at a speed of 16, should the duplex be full or >half. If it's at half, what may be some problems as a result of it. >thanks. >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "Window" field - TCP packet
Hi Dale, you can find a copy of Ethepeek/Tokenpeek on every CD that comes in the Sybex Todd Lammle books. Old CCNA 1.0, ACRC books in particular. Hope you get the lab on first try. :>) Dale CCNA _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is TDM full duplex or half duplex
Hi everyone, Does anyone know if Time Division Multiplexing will work with only half duplexing or only full duplexing or both. Jeff Lodwick MCSE/CCNA _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM & CDP
The "show cdp neighbors detail" command will show you the IP address of the neighbors. Vijay Ramcharan CCNP, CCDP, MCSE -Original Message- From: Jake Secrist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ATM & CDP I have a Cisco router connected to a Cisco LightStream 1010 ATM switch. The 'sh int atm 1/0' command shows that the interface and line protocol are up, but I can't ping what I thought was the IP address of the switch's ATM interface(10.11.1.2/24). I know the IP address of the ATM interface on the router (10.11.1.1/24), but I can't figure out the IP address of the switch's ATM interface. Would this address normally show up in the 'show cdp neighbors' command? The output of that command shows nothing for the ATM interface. In the 'sh ip arp' command, there are only Ethernet entries, none for ATM. Also, can you ping over ATM? Obviously I don't know a whole lot about ATM, but I'd appreciate any help anyone can offer. Thanks, Jake __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 line: the best solution ?
backup interface does not just refer to dialup. It is a common practice to use this kind of dialup backup as it is cheaper. -Original Message- From: Cristi Piatnitchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2000 14:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 line: the best solution ? Hi all I have 2 leased line (64kb) one of them working with voice and data and the other one just with data. 2 Cisco routers. I want to set-up these lines to work toghether. Which one is the best solution: router - router | | \-->Multiplexor--Multiplexor
Re: access server can't access the dial in- pls help :(
Hi, Sometimes you need the 'modem type ...' or 'modem type autoconfigure' line to allow the router to configure the proper lines on the modem. After finding my USR modem, my access server would answer automatically. Hope this helps, Paul "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear all, > > I have configured a access server as shown below, I attach my modem in Asyn > 1 port and I can reverse telnet to it and the phone line got no problem. > > Besides, I used use a PC (win95) with a modem installed. In win95, I use > hyperterminal to connect the PC modem and tested the at command,.. it work, > so I used atdt 7 (my access server phone no) but I only heard the ring > ring tone, the access server never accept it but I can see from the word > RING RING on the access server's modem at command console. What should I > configure to let the access server modem pick up the call > > > > > ### > > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 60.200.166.11 255.255.252.0 > no logging event subif-link-status > ! > > interface Async1 > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > encapsulation ppp > no logging event subif-link-status > async dynamic address > async mode interactive > peer default ip address 60.200.166.15 > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 60.200.164.1 permanent > ! > line con 0 > line 1 > password abc123 > autoselect ppp > login > modem InOut > transport input all > stopbits 1 > speed 2400 > flowcontrol hardware > > == > De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > == > The information contained in this message may be confidential > and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. > > > == > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDA
Hi I took it couple of days ago, 72 questions, 120 minuets, 755 to pass. A lot of reading I had about 40 scenario questions. ""Jayesh Patel"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 004301c038fd$a0f27720$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:004301c038fd$a0f27720$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello I am preparing for my CCDA exam! Can i have some help !!! how many > questions, time for the exam !!! how tuff !! what are the main area it > concontrates on!! > > > > Jayesh Patel > CNE(4 & 5),MCP,MCP+I,MCSE,MCNE,CCNA > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 3rd Floor, Devon HouseIP Division, NTT Europe Ltd. > 58-60 St. Katharine's Way [Tel] +44 20 7977 1182 > London E1 9LB, UK [Fax] +44 20 7977 1001 > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slightly OT: Stable IOS versions, 12.1?
We are currently running 11.2(17) on our 7513 backbone router and we're going to be upgrading to 12 in the near future. After examining the bug reports I initially picked 12.0(12) since it looked pretty stable. However, 12.0 does not have some nifty features that we like, especially the "grep"-like command "include" and the ability to pipe show commands. We are now putting 12.1(4) on our branch routers (2620s) but I was wondering if anyone had any experience, good or bad, with 12.1 on a 7500 series router. We need error-free performance with EIGRP, DLSw+, IP, IPX, WFQ, ATM. I'm a little hesitant to put the latest IOS on our backbone router, but from the looks of it, 12.1(4) might be a better choice than 12.0(12), but it seems like upgrading the IOS on a Cisco router is a crap shoot; you just pray that the bugs of that particular version don't hurt you TOO much. Ok, I'll quit rambling and go get some more coffee. Any input will be gladly accepted. -- John ___ Say Bye to Slow Internet! http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CiscoSecure
Hi all, I have some questions on dial-up security. Currently we are using CiscoSecure on a Unix platform, with the default ISQL database, and AAA using TACACS+. These seem to have been all the wrong choices. The current thought is to continue with CiscoSecure, but use it on an NT box, with the default database, and change to RADIUS. I think that maybe a mistake, TACACS seems so much more robust, and we already have a good start on it (over 3,000 users defined). But, it seems like Cisco is not giving it very much support anymore. So, the question is, is anybody using CiscoSecure with NT and Radius, and liking it, or is there any other product people are happy with and would recommend? Thanks in advance, C. Cubberley State of New Jersey _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: 5-4-3 rule
Using the 5-4-3 rule, why can only 3 segments be populated __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: COLT tests
How would I take the Colt tests? Are these the same practise tests on the Cisco web site that is for registered CCO users? I forget the url but does anyone know the url? I would appreciate it. Thank you. >From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT tests >Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 06:38:42 PDT > >Yes, If the COLT tests were tires, I'm afraid they would be Firestone >Wilderness series...complete with the deflating effect > >(Sorry, couldn't help it). > >Lance > > >>From: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:46:10 CDT >> >>Thank God its not just me. I took 2 of the Colts as a pre-assesment for >>taking BCSN, and thought I had no chance of ever passing the real thing >>and >>should learn to change tires instead!! I feel a lot better knowing that >>they really are as awful as I thought they were. >> >>Whew! >>-Ejay >> >> >>Original Message Follows >>From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:27:34 PDT >> >>I think I have to agree. >> >>I took the CCDA COLT test yesterday, and to my dismay, despite using the >>book for occational referance I missed 12 out of 52. The questions I >>missed >>were many of the questions I looked up in the book (DCN Cisco Press). The >>test contradicts the book often, and several times questions have multiple >>correct answers, not in which there is a "best answer" but there are >>literaly several 100% correct answers for each question, and you are >>allowed >>to pick just one. It did open my eyes to some problem areas for me, but >>this is not a route I would go for legitimate readiness evaluation. >> >>Cheers, >> >>Lance >> >> >>>From: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:43:56 -0500 >>> >>>COLT testsMy opinion of them is that they only confuse the issue. I >>>counted >>>over 15 questions on the CIT-Pre exam that either had no correct answers >>>listed or had wrong answers; I even took the test OPEN-BOOK to try to get >>>through it. There is a very good reason that these questions are not on >>>the >>>real exam (badly-worded questions, no correct choices, nebulous >>>questions, >>>badly-worded answers, questions so detailed and obscure that they require >>>a >>>Cisco white paper or field notice to answer, etc.), and no one has made >>>any >>>attempt to improve them. What is amazing about some of them is that they >>>are direct mis-quotes from some of the Cisco-Press books, and some were >>>paraphrased incorrectly and unintentionally changed the meaning. It is my >>>belief that these questions were not written by Cisco but rather some >>>hired >>>third-party who didn't understand the material they were asking about >>>(let's hope that this is the case, or else they are a real embarrassment >>>to >>>Cisco!). I had to inform Cisco that the CIT-8/28 exam wasn't even showing >>>the gifs (they have since fixed that at least). Don't use this resourse >>>to >>>make a decision on whether you are ready for the real exam, just use it >>>as >>>a reference to make sure that you have covered the material. The real >>>exam >>>has a few nebulous questions, but not to the extent that the assessment >>>exams do. >>> >>>Regards, >>>MLC >>> "Lonnie Paschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>>8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >>> They are practice beta exams that are avaialable to cco login users. >>>No >>>charge, excellent rescource! >>> "Ricardo Ciganda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>>C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01">news:C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01... >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I would like to know what is the finality of the COLT tests. May I >>>have to paid for this or is only a simulation of a test? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Ricardo Ciganda >>> Dpto. de Sistemas >>> Bytemaster Servicios Informaticos S.A. >>> >> >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >_
Re: Slightly OT: Stable IOS versions, 12.1?
I have seen 12.1(4) work well on a fully stocked 7513 (with FE, SMDS, TR, and FDDI). Of course, YMWV. There is no way to say for sure that it won't take *your* backbone out... [=`) Dale [=`) >From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Slightly OT: Stable IOS versions, 12.1? >Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:39:56 -0700 (PDT) > >We are currently running 11.2(17) on our 7513 backbone router and we're >going to be upgrading to 12 in the near future. After examining the bug >reports I initially picked 12.0(12) since it looked pretty stable. >However, >12.0 does not have some nifty features that we like, especially the >"grep"-like command "include" and the ability to pipe show commands. > >We are now putting 12.1(4) on our branch routers (2620s) but I was >wondering >if anyone had any experience, good or bad, with 12.1 on a 7500 series >router. We need error-free performance with EIGRP, DLSw+, IP, IPX, WFQ, >ATM. > >I'm a little hesitant to put the latest IOS on our backbone router, but >from >the looks of it, 12.1(4) might be a better choice than 12.0(12), but it >seems like upgrading the IOS on a Cisco router is a crap shoot; you just >pray that the bugs of that particular version don't hurt you TOO much. > >Ok, I'll quit rambling and go get some more coffee. Any input will be >gladly accepted. > >-- John > > > > > >___ >Say Bye to Slow Internet! >http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: 5-4-3 rule
>From a document at U Texas: (http://wwwhost.ots.utexas.edu/ethernet/ch13-ora/ch13.html) --Begin Quote--- The "5-4-3" Rule An over-simplified version of the 10 Mbps Model 1 rules, called the "5-4-3" rule, has been circulating for some years. Various forms of the 5-4-3 rule have been published, and some of them include misleading terms that are incorrect. To quote from one widely distributed configuration guide, the 5-4-3 rule means that there may be as many as five segments connected in series in a network. This guide further states that up to four repeaters may be used, and up to three "populated segments." A populated segment is defined as a segment that is "attached to PCs." While this may sound like an easy to remember rule of thumb, the "5-4-3" rule is an over-simplification of the actual configuration rules described above. Worse, the use of the term "populated segment" is misleading. This definition means that a coax segment could be regarded as an "unpopulated" segment in a network system as long as two conditions were met. First, the coax segment was not used to support PCs and, second, the segment was only used as a link segment to connect to a repeater at each end. However, this is incorrect. A link segment is specifically defined in the 802.3 standard as a segment based on a point-to-point full-duplex media type that connects two--and only two--MAUs. A full-duplex medium means that the medium provides separate transmit and receive data paths. This is important, since collision detection occurs faster on a full-duplex medium than it does on coaxial segments. This difference in timing is factored into the total round-trip timing delays that are incorporated in the Model 1 configuration guidelines. That's why the notion of an "unpopulated" coax segment that could be used as a link segment is misleading and incorrect. To recast the 5-4-3 rule into something closer to reality, we can define it to mean that you can have up to five segments in series, with up to four repeaters, and no more than three "mixing" segments. If three mixing segments are used, then the remaining two segments must be link segments as defined in 802.3. Actually, you can have up to four mixing segments under some circumstances as described in the real 802.3 rules above, so even our corrected 5-4-3 rule is still an over-simplification. --End Quote--- So, I hope that helps... Dale [=`) >From: John Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: John Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: OT: 5-4-3 rule >Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:50:06 -0700 (PDT) > >Using the 5-4-3 rule, why can only 3 segments be populated > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. >http://im.yahoo.com/ > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't Ping Local Serial Interface of 2610
Title: Re: Can't Ping Local Serial Interface of 2610 After adding the Frame-relay Map statement, as suggested by several people, I was able to ping the local serial Interface. I then created the interface as a Sub-interface and attempted to use the Frame-relay map command and received the "You should use the Frame-Relay Interface-dlci" command from the router. When the Tnterface-dlci command was applied to the sub-interface (s0/0.1) IP traffic began passing back and forth on the serial link. I also had to add the appropriate static route to the default gateway, as suggested, so other clients on the development network (192.168.1.0) would know where to send traffic destined for the test network (192.168.3.0) or the Intermediate network (192.168.4.0). Routes had already been setup on the routers, but the default gateway did not know about the 192.168.4.0 network until I added the static route. After adding the route all traffic successfully was passed from all clients to the Test network via the intermediate successfully. I understand now why I had to assign the Map statement to the global interface, so that layer Layer 3 knows which layer 2 interface to use, what I am still a little confused about is why the command changes when applied to a sub-interface to Frame-relay interface-dlci instead of Frame Relay Map IP. I appreciate all responses they all helped me to troubleshoot and understand the Frame Relay technology successfully, thank you. Ken Claussen MCSE CCA CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The mind is a terrible thing to waste!"
Employment Opportunity
We are looking for certified CCIE's to work in our MN or MA offices. If you know of anyone interested in exploring opportunities, please ask them to check us out http://www.us.bull.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is TDM full duplex or half duplex
TDM to me means T-1 and similar technology. It is full duplex sending seperate transmit and receive bit streams. > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Lodwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 8:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Is TDM full duplex or half duplex > > > Hi everyone, > Does anyone know if Time Division Multiplexing will work with > only half > duplexing or only full duplexing or both. Jeff Lodwick MCSE/CCNA > __ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT: Stable IOS versions, 12.1?
If you have VIP2-10 or 15s you may need to upgrade the memory on those cards when updating to 12. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn4489_05141999.html > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 9:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Slightly OT: Stable IOS versions, 12.1? > > > We are currently running 11.2(17) on our 7513 backbone router > and we're > going to be upgrading to 12 in the near future. After > examining the bug > reports I initially picked 12.0(12) since it looked pretty > stable. However, > 12.0 does not have some nifty features that we like, especially the > "grep"-like command "include" and the ability to pipe show commands. > > We are now putting 12.1(4) on our branch routers (2620s) but > I was wondering > if anyone had any experience, good or bad, with 12.1 on a 7500 series > router. We need error-free performance with EIGRP, DLSw+, > IP, IPX, WFQ, > ATM. > > I'm a little hesitant to put the latest IOS on our backbone > router, but from > the looks of it, 12.1(4) might be a better choice than > 12.0(12), but it > seems like upgrading the IOS on a Cisco router is a crap > shoot; you just > pray that the bugs of that particular version don't hurt you TOO much. > > Ok, I'll quit rambling and go get some more coffee. Any input will be > gladly accepted. > > -- John > > > > > > ___ > Say Bye to Slow Internet! > http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCSE opportunities
You've posted this on the Cisco newsgroup. You might want to look into the Check Point newsgroup they're at: news.checkpoint.com :-) David Ng Senior Systems Engineer Integration Technologies Inc. 1201 Dove Street Suite 200 Newport Beach CA 92660 Microsoft MCSE, Cisco CCNA/CCDA, Citrix CCA, Check Point CCSA Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 81133F7199A3D411818E00508B8B74120B3D69@SERVTUNEXCH">news:81133F7199A3D411818E00508B8B74120B3D69@SERVTUNEXCH... > Role - CCSE Firewall Support Manager / Trainer > Term - Contract > Rate - £market rate > > Job - My Client a Managed Firewall Service Provider/CheckpointFirewall-1 > (CCSE) training body requires an experienced Firewall Support Manager to > support, configure and install CheckpointFirewall-1 for managed service. In > addition the role will involve providing training on in-house CCSE course as > an Instructor. Candidate must be CCSE certified and ALL instructor training > will be provided. > > Candidate must have at least 3 years experience hands-on with > CheckpointFirewall-1 in Cisco or NT Networks. > > Reply - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My user name for GroupStudy.com is MarkT > > Regards > Mark Thomas > Network Sales Consultant > 01892 525260 > 07765 880949 > > __ > > Mark Thomas > Xpert IT Recruitment Limited > 3rd Floor, Abbey Court, St Johns Road, Tunbridge Wells TN4 9TE > T: +44 (0) 1892 525260 F: +44 (0) 1892 517942 > > The contents of this email and any attached files are confidential and may > be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the addressee, any > disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or other dissemination or > use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete > this email. > > Xpert IT Recruitment Limited is registered in England No. 2897012 > Registered Office: 3 Boyne Park, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN4 8EN > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Re: External & Internal BGP]
Couldn't you also have RB2 route-reflect the info to RB1? Mike --- ElephantChild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18 Oct 2000, FAISAL ATHAR wrote: > > > Can you please describe this in detail with some > example. > > AS64512 AS64513 AS64514 > 10.0.0.0/16 10.1.0.0/16 10.2.0.0/16 > RA1<===>RB1 RB3<===>RC1 >\ / > RB2 > > - means uses an IGP > = means uses BGP > > In this setup, RB3 can't carry to RC1 the info that > 10.0.0.0/16 is in AS > 64512, since the IGP only tells it that RB2 is the > next hop on the way > to it. That means that the loop detection feature of > BGP, and indeed > most of its path selection mechanisms, is > unavailable. > > To fix it, you have to make RB1 and RB3 peer > together, like this: > > AS64512 AS64513 AS64514 > 10.0.0.0/16 10.1.0.0/16 10.2.0.0/16 > RA1<===>RB1<===>RB3<===>RC1 >\ / > RB2 > > Note that RB2 doesn't need to peer with either RB1 > or RB3, or indeed to > run BGP at all. > > > ElephantChild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 18 Oct 2000, FAISAL ATHAR wrote: > > > > > Can any one explain the purpose of Internal > BGP.According to my knowledge > > it > > > it used between sites with in the same > autonomous system. > > > > True, assuming you mean routers. > > > > > But Question is that BGP is Exterior routing > protocol,develop mainly to > > > connect two different autonomous systems, then > what is the purpose of > > Using > > > Internal BGP, within the same autonomous sytems > although we could use any > > > other Interior routing protocol there. > > > > You need internal BGP to carry path information > between external BGP > > routers, eg for a transit AS. > > -- > Bungee jumping and skydiving are for wimps. If you > want to experience > true gut-wrenching terror, have children. --Dusty > Rhoades. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Employment Opportunity
As opposed to those UN-certified CCIE's I suppose. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > We are looking for certified CCIE's to work in our MN or MA offices. If > you know of anyone interested in exploring opportunities, please ask them > to check us out http://www.us.bull.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPOA Question
Can Ingress and Engress Located on Same Swicth ? For example I like Ingress belong to Vlan 1 on Cat A and Engress belong to Vlan 2 on Cat A and I like to use MPOA Is that Possible ? Thanks in advance __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WFQ on X.25, LAPB etc. .....
Hi, Could somebody explain why WFQ is not an option when using X.25, LAPB, compressed PPP and SDLC? The Cisco BCRAN book mentions FIFO as the default queuing method for the above but not an explanation as to why. Thank you. Kind regards, Niraj _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCMSN fill in the blank questions?
The exhibits supply you with a plethora of choices. Brad ""Timothy W. Roberts"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Does this test have a exhibit box that has choices or is straight from > memory? > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDA
Alot of case studies. Be prepared to read and take the full two hours. Brad ""Jayesh Patel"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 004301c038fd$a0f27720$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:004301c038fd$a0f27720$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello I am preparing for my CCDA exam! Can i have some help !!! how many > questions, time for the exam !!! how tuff !! what are the main area it > concontrates on!! > > > > Jayesh Patel > CNE(4 & 5),MCP,MCP+I,MCSE,MCNE,CCNA > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 3rd Floor, Devon HouseIP Division, NTT Europe Ltd. > 58-60 St. Katharine's Way [Tel] +44 20 7977 1182 > London E1 9LB, UK [Fax] +44 20 7977 1001 > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Employment Opportunity
That language seems to imply,"No matter how much you know, if you don't have the cert, don't bother." Bri On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As opposed to those UN-certified CCIE's I suppose. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > We are looking for certified CCIE's to work in our MN or MA offices. If > > you know of anyone interested in exploring opportunities, please ask them > > to check us out http://www.us.bull.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't Ping Local Serial Interface of 2610
Dear Ken, Thanks for the followup. The reason for the change in the frame (dlci) map command is related to the fact that it is a point-to-point interface. Consider further: The purpose of the frame map statement is to explicitly map the L3 address to a L2 dlci number. On a multipoint interface, there may be several dlci numbers in play, so the particular dlci must be explicitly paired with a L3 address. However, on a point-to-point sub-interface there is only one dlci number. Once the dlci is known, the router can make the connection by considering the sub-interface's ip address and mask. If a packet is to be forwarded to the subnet defined by the IP address on a given ptp sub-interface, then it is mapped to the single dlci associated with this ptp link. All the router needs to know is what dlci is associated with this ptp sub-interface. It then has the info it needs to map L3 addresses to that dlci. HTH, John >>> "Claussen, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/18/00 08:42AM >>> After adding the Frame-relay Map statement, as suggested by several people, I was able to ping the local serial Interface. I then created the interface as a Sub-interface and attempted to use the Frame-relay map command and received the "You should use the Frame-Relay Interface-dlci" command from the router. When the Tnterface-dlci command was applied to the sub-interface (s0/0.1) IP traffic began passing back and forth on the serial link. I also had to add the appropriate static route to the default gateway, as suggested, so other clients on the development network (192.168.1.0) would know where to send traffic destined for the test network (192.168.3.0) or the Intermediate network (192.168.4.0). Routes had already been setup on the routers, but the default gateway did not know about the 192.168.4.0 network until I added the static route. After adding the route all traffic successfully was passed from all clients to the Test network via the intermediate successfully. I understand now why I had to assign the Map statement to the global interface, so that layer Layer 3 knows which layer 2 interface to use, what I am still a little confused about is why the command changes when applied to a sub-interface to Frame-relay interface-dlci instead of Frame Relay Map IP. I appreciate all responses they all helped me to troubleshoot and understand the Frame Relay technology successfully, thank you. Ken Claussen MCSE CCA CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The mind is a terrible thing to waste!" _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should be easy VPN
I am using a PIX for a VPN Solution in my SOHO. I am using PPTP because that is the easy way out. After a lengthy struggle, I can finally take a Windows NT laptop and dial into an ISP and then use RAS to connect and authenticate on my PIX via PPTP. My PIX issues my laptop an IP address from the local pool. My local pool is issuing a portion of addresses that I have omitted from DHCP on my LAN. When I do an IPCONFIG on my laptop I can see the IP address issued from the ISP and the IP address issued from the PIX. Here's the problem: I can't ping anything on my LAN including my "Inside" port from my laptop. When I telnet from my LAN into my PIX, I can't ping my laptop, But I can ping the address on the laptop that was issued by the ISP. When I do a "show vpdn", I see an active tunnel but the only IP address I see is the one on the laptop from the ISP. Can anybody explain to me why the PIX would not be routing the IP address that it issued to the laptop across the inside and outside ports. TIA, Brian Parris Network/Systems Administrator www.carotek.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Employment Opportunity
which might not sound as bad as it feels (or hurts). If they are Silver or Gold partners they need CCIEs to either keep their discounts or to get more. To keep their status (if someone left) or to upgrade it. Kevin Wigle CCDP/CCNP - Original Message - From: "Brian W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:23 PM Subject: Re: Employment Opportunity > That language seems to imply,"No matter how much you know, if you don't > have the cert, don't bother." > > Bri > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > As opposed to those UN-certified CCIE's I suppose. > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Juniper
...well, this mail was a long time ago, but you are right: the foot print in this context is the image's size in memory. C. >From: Rayappa Mayakunthala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Rayappa Mayakunthala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Casey Fahey'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Juniper >Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:40:12 +0530 > >Wait a minute, I had a different understanding of "foot print" in software. >Foot print in software is the size of the image to be loaded. Are you sure >that "foot print" here is not referring to the size of the image of the >IOS/JUNOS? > >Cheers, > Rayappa. > > >-Original Message- >From: Casey Fahey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 4:29 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Juniper > > > >A footprint is the amount of floor space the device takes up. Smaller is >often better, especially in a crowded lab or service bureau. > >As to which is better, that depends on what criteria you are applying. >Generally speaking, Juniper equipment is considered to be comparable to and >in some cases better than similar Cisco routers in terms of performance. >You will typically get more bang-for-the-buck with Juniper. > >OTOH, there is a much smaller population of Juniper-jockeys and therefore >there will be a learning curve with the product. "Nobody ever got fired >for > >buying Cisco...". In addition, Cisco has a more diverse and extensive >product base, so it is possible in many cases to have an all-Cisco shop, >thus saving on training and related expenses. > >BTW, Juniper focuses exclusively at the high-end (ATM switches, etc.). >AFAIK, Juniper does not field any workgroup type products. > >HTH, > >Casey > > >From: Nova Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Nova Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Juniper > >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:56:27 -0400 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id > >MHotMailBB9D127F0046D821EED8D020AF4E0C8021; Thu Sep 28 15:36:56 2000 > >Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) > >with SMTP id SAA12785;Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:06:13 -0400 > >Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 28 Sep 2000 >17:59:36 > >-0400 > >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id > >RAA12184GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:59:35 -0400 > >Received: from gopostal.geo.e-media.com (gopostal.e-media.com > >[208.185.37.8])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id > >RAA12167GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:59:34 -0400 > >Received: by gopostal.geo.e-media.com with Internet Mail Service > >(5.5.2650.21)id ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:56:33 -0400 > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 28 15:40:38 2000 > >Message-ID: > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) > >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Help guys, > > > >My company wants to buy Juniper routers instead of Cisco. Having never > >worked with Juniper equipment before I don't know why it's so good. > > > >I'm told that it's faster, cheaper and has a smaller foot print? What's a > >foot print? Is it really better then Cisco? > > > >Nova Rich > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >The information transmitted is intended only for the person >or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential >and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, >dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance >upon, this information by persons or entities other than the >intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, >please contact the sender and delete the material from any >computer. > > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share i
Re: diff b/w BSCN and BCMSN?
Try looking at the course outlines. http://cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan/programs/ccnp.html "deltan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Could anyone tell me the differences between BSCN and > BCMSN in terms of coverage for switching and routing > etc? > > Any more details would be highly appreciated. > > Thanks! > > -D > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. > http://im.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE are of less and less importance because there is such a short supply of people, employers no better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface
If I add a loopback interface to a router, when will the router take it as the router ID? Here's a scenario: Serial2/1 is the current router ID: 209.1.1.1 I add Loopback0, which is 10.0.0.1 Shouldn't the router take this as its router ID? When does this happen? Doing: clear ip ospf process Still shows the old router ID. Is there any way to force the router to take the ID from the loopback interface? On another router, I couldn't get it to change until after reload. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCMSN fill in the blank questions?
I took the test on October 12, and I had 2 fill-in-the-blanks straight from memory. Original Message Follows From: "Brad Nixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Brad Nixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BCMSN fill in the blank questions? Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:24:38 -0700 The exhibits supply you with a plethora of choices. Brad ""Timothy W. Roberts"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Does this test have a exhibit box that has choices or is straight from > memory? > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 line: the best solution ?
Hi all First,thanks for your help. I have studied the CISCO docs but no results These are the two routing lines for my routers ip route 10.2.44.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.39.98 90 ip route 10.2.44.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.38.98 100 It worth saying that the backup line is always up.It caries voice also. Does the backup config work even for frame relay links (one of my serials could be a FR link) 1) I want to ask you if the routes should have the same cost ? 2) Shall I configure the router from the other end with backup config too ? 3) How does it work this configs ? I don't understand if both links will work in the same time when the first one reaches the level specified in: backup load 70 50 70 means that the second line is activated at 70% of the main line 50 means that the second line is deactivated at 50% of the main line Thans in advance for help Please see below for scheme On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:54:33 +0200, Andrew Larkins wrote: > backup interface does not just refer to dialup. It is a common practice to > use this kind of dialup backup as it is cheaper. > > -Original Message- > From: Cristi Piatnitchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18 October 2000 14:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 2 line: the best solution ? > > > Hi all > > I have 2 leased line (64kb) one of them working with voice and data and the > other one just with data. 2 Cisco routers. I want to set-up these lines to > work toghether. Which one is the best solution: > > router - router > | | > \-->Multiplexor--Multiplexor^ ^ >| | >| | > voice voice > > -load balancing (with EIGRP) > -splitting the traffic using queues > -it is possible (as somebody from this list already sugested me) to setup > the second line (voice/data) as a backup line for the first one even though > there is no dial-up ? (I understood that this command (back-up) is for a > dialu-up backup line. > -is there a solution to separate the traffic so than the request to go > trough a line and the response to the same request to arive on the second > line ? (u know, to separate upload/download traffic) > > Any other idees ? > > Thanks in advance > Cristian > > > > > > ___ > Say Bye to Slow Internet! > http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Say Bye to Slow Internet! http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSCN
Hi guys Has any one read this book for his Exams, how good is it Building Scalable Cisco Networks by Thomas M. Thomas II Tan Nam-Kee George A DISCLAIMER This e-mail is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and may be confidential. If you are not an addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than TeleCity Limited or the addressees of its existence or contents. If you have received this email and are not a named addressee, please delete it and notify the TeleCity IT department on 0161 226 7643 or by email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token ring and duplex
It's not "real" token ring. &;-) Seriously. Full-duplex Ethernet isn't real CSMA/CD either. The more we learn, the less we know! Argh. Priscilla At 08:36 AM 10/18/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >Okay,now I'm Confuzzled. A Token ring Frame is timed so that the first >bit of a MTU sized frame returns to the Sending station immediately after >the last bit was transmitted. Then It checks the error/received bits and >strips it off the ring. How could it work full duplex unless there were >two tokens on the ring? > >Original Message Follows >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:59:22 -0700 > >The Dedicated Token Ring port adapter (PA-4R-DTR) is available on Cisco >7500 series routers, Cisco 7200 series routers, and Cisco 7000 series >routers with the 7000 Series Route Switch Processor (RSP7000) and 7000 >Series Chassis Interface (RSP7000CI). > >The PA-4R-DTR provides up to four IBM Token Ring or IEEE 802.5 Token Ring >interfaces. Each Token Ring interface can be set for 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps >half-duplex or full-duplex operation and can operate as a standard Token >Ring station or as a concentrator port. The default for all interfaces is >Token Ring station mode with half-duplex 16-Mbps operation. The PA-4R-DTR >connects over Type 1 lobe or Type 3 lobe cables, with each interface >providing an RJ-45 receptacle. > >So, Token Ring does have a "full-duplex" operation. I guess you would use >it on back-to-back links, just like you use full-duplex Ethernet on >back-to-back links. > >Priscilla > >At 05:13 PM 10/17/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >>Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex settings do not apply in a Token ring environment. >> >>Duplex settings deterrmine whether or not a system can recieve and >>transmit at the smae time in a CSMA/_C_ollision _D_etect (Ethernet) >>environment. >>Token Ring Does not use CSMA/CD, but use token-passing instead. >> >>On a Token Ring network, only one system transmits at a time, all of the >>others listen. >> >> >>Original Message Follows >>From: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Token ring and duplex >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:07:16 GMT >> >>If a token ring is running at a speed of 16, should the duplex be full or >>half. If it's at half, what may be some problems as a result of it. >>thanks. >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM & CDP
depends on how you're set up. on the interface: map-group 1 in global config: map-list 1 ip 198.103.x.x atm-vc 1 broadcast <== next hop should get you pingable but if you're using sub-interfaces then: on the interface: interface ATM1/0.2 point-to-point ip address 198.103.x.x 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast atm pvc 2 0 172 aal5snap 1 1 it just doesn't happen by putting an address on the interface. also, remember that ATM passes cells, if you want to get ip stats from it then you will have to make a BVI. Here is an example on one of our lab routers. LabR05#sh ip arp Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface Internet 198.103.x.x - 00e0.b03f.fc40 ARPA Ethernet2/0 Internet 198.103.x.x 65 0800.2bb3.19b5 ARPA Ethernet2/0 Internet 198.103.x.x - 00e0.b03f.fc41 ARPA Ethernet2/1 Internet 198.103.x.x 1 .0c3f.026b ARPA Ethernet2/0 Internet 198.103.x.x - .0c49.2958 ARPA BVI1 Internet 198.103.x.x207 0050.7338.7401 ARPA BVI1 Internet 198.103.x.x 7 0010.5a89.bbdf ARPA Ethernet2/0 Internet 198.103.x.x 1 .b450.4554 ARPA Ethernet2/0 Internet 198.103.x.x 2 0060.089e.09f0 ARPA Ethernet2/0 Internet 198.103.x.x 1 00e0.14cc.6300 ARPA Ethernet2/0 Internet 198.103.x.x 0 0800.2085.7c7a ARPA Ethernet2/0 here you can see that the BVI definitely responds to IP. hope this gives you a few ideas. Kevin Wigle CCDP/CCNP... - Original Message - From: "Jake Secrist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 9:00 AM Subject: ATM & CDP > I have a Cisco router connected to a Cisco LightStream 1010 ATM switch. > The 'sh int atm 1/0' command shows that the interface and line > protocol are up, but I can't ping what I thought was the IP address of > the switch's ATM interface(10.11.1.2/24). I know the IP address of the > ATM interface on the router (10.11.1.1/24), but I can't figure out the > IP address of the switch's ATM interface. Would this address normally > show up in the 'show cdp neighbors' command? The output of that > command shows nothing for the ATM interface. In the 'sh ip arp' > command, there are only Ethernet entries, none for ATM. Also, can you > ping over ATM? Obviously I don't know a whole lot about ATM, but I'd > appreciate any help anyone can offer. > > Thanks, > > Jake > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. > http://im.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
There may be some truth to what you're saying, but the certifications certainly will continue to have an impact on that person's starting salary. - Original Message - From: Terrence Garrison To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:54 PM Subject: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE are of less and less importance because there is such a short supply of people, employers no better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE are of less and less importance because there is such a short supply of people, employers no better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 line: the best solution ?
Have you considered putting voice on one of the links and data on the other? If you mix voice and data on the same 64-Kbps link, you may have too much delay for the voice. On slow links, serialization delay is a significant factor. Let's say someone starts an FTP transfer at the same time the president of the company starts a voice over IP (is that what you use?) call to the company executives. FTP uses 1500 byte packets. While the serial port it outputting a 1500-byte packet, (which would take 188 milliseconds), your voice packet is waiting. Since one-way delay is only supposed to be 200 milliseconds for voice, you're already in trouble. You could use fragmentation to chop up the 1500-byte packets. Both PPP and Frame Relay support data-link-layer fragmentation. (not sure what you have) You may want to study your traffic a bit more before designing a solution Priscilla >-Original Message- >From: Cristi Piatnitchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 18 October 2000 14:56 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: 2 line: the best solution ? > > >Hi all > >I have 2 leased line (64kb) one of them working with voice and data and the >other one just with data. 2 Cisco routers. I want to set-up these lines to >work toghether. Which one is the best solution: > >router - router >| | >\-->Multiplexor--Multiplexor ^ ^ > | | > | | > voice voice > >-load balancing (with EIGRP) >-splitting the traffic using queues >-it is possible (as somebody from this list already sugested me) to setup >the second line (voice/data) as a backup line for the first one even though >there is no dial-up ? (I understood that this command (back-up) is for a >dialu-up backup line. >-is there a solution to separate the traffic so than the request to go >trough a line and the response to the same request to arive on the second >line ? (u know, to separate upload/download traffic) > >Any other idees ? > >Thanks in advance >Cristian Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE > are of less and less importance because there > is such a short supply of people, I am sorry Terrence, but I would suggest you do your homework on this one, many employers won't even talk to you without those certs. employers no better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? I think you are looking at the wrong friggin job sites and speaking to the wrong recruiters. Does this mean that noncertified people don't know as much? No, I don't believe so, however the Certification acts as a recognized symbol of your knowledge or a representation therein. My suggestion, get the certs, it won't hurt you one bit. Got change from my two cents? Will Gragido CCNA, CCDA, MCP Salty Bastard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Terrence Garrison > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 12:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > > > I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE > are of less and less importance because there > is such a short supply of people, employers no > better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA
I would when I took it, I think I went for fifty minutes, and felt as though I rushed a little on the way. Those case studies are tedious yet necessary. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Brad Nixon > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 12:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCDA > > > Alot of case studies. Be prepared to read and take the full two hours. > Brad > ""Jayesh Patel"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 004301c038fd$a0f27720$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:004301c038fd$a0f27720$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hello I am preparing for my CCDA exam! Can i have some help !!! how many > > questions, time for the exam !!! how tuff !! what are the main area it > > concontrates on!! > > > > > > > > Jayesh Patel > > CNE(4 & 5),MCP,MCP+I,MCSE,MCNE,CCNA > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 3rd Floor, Devon HouseIP Division, NTT Europe Ltd. > > 58-60 St. Katharine's Way [Tel] +44 20 7977 1182 > > London E1 9LB, UK [Fax] +44 20 7977 1001 > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Practicing Dentist at 21 years old
No...lets talk about Lucent and Nortel >From: Sam Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Sam Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'CCNP_CCDP'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Practicing Dentist at 21 years old >Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 12:03:13 -0700 > >I apologize for the rants... > >let's drop it and talk about Cisco. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Sam Adams >Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 11:09 AM >To: 'CCNP_CCDP'; 'adam lee' >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Practicing Dentist at 21 years old > > >Uh, you're the one wanted to dental. I can arrange it but I think it's >gonna cost you more then your dental insurance since you seem to doubt I >know such a person. I am not bragging that I know this person. I simply >posted that I did and you were the one that seem to have a good time >disrespecting him. I responded in kind to you. > >Now, don't bother me anymore little boy cause the filter is in place with >your name on it. > >-Original Message- >From: CCNP_CCDP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 6:41 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'adam lee' >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Practicing Dentist at 21 years old > > >Yup, just as I thought... > > > > Sure, send me your address and I will take care of everything. > > > > > > Adam, > > I live in California and I do have dental insurance, > > and I'm looking to change dentists. So please > > tell me how I can get an appointment. Since you > > are offering his services, telling me to "drop by", > > I'll take you up on it. I hope this is for real and > > you didn't make the whole thing up. > > > > > > Please hurry because I have a toothache! > > > > > > > > > > > > CCNP, he charges full price and if you have any > > > coverage, drop on by. As a matter of fact, he works > > > at clinics too(as most dentists do) so if you have no > > > insurance you can still drop on by! > > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface
John, It depends on which IOS version you use. In later images you will need to either reboot or to remove the process and readd it. I do not quite remember when this behavior changed. Rgds, Patrick John Deatherage wrote: > If I add a loopback interface to a router, when will the router take it as > the router ID? Here's a scenario: > > Serial2/1 is the current router ID: 209.1.1.1 > > I add Loopback0, which is 10.0.0.1 > > Shouldn't the router take this as its router ID? When does this happen? > Doing: > > clear ip ospf process > > Still shows the old router ID. Is there any way to force the router to take > the ID from the loopback interface? On another router, I couldn't get it to > change until after reload. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Token ring and duplex
With Token Ring 802.5r (and a capable switch) each token ring connection becomes it's own ring utilizing full duplex to accomplish this. Louie Since time immemorial and pre-industrial, 'greed' has been the accusation hurled at the rich by the concrete-bound illiterates who were unable to conceive of the source of wealth or of the motivation of those who produce it. -- Ayn Rand -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 12:47 PM To: Ejay Hire; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex It's not "real" token ring. &;-) Seriously. Full-duplex Ethernet isn't real CSMA/CD either. The more we learn, the less we know! Argh. Priscilla At 08:36 AM 10/18/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >Okay,now I'm Confuzzled. A Token ring Frame is timed so that the first >bit of a MTU sized frame returns to the Sending station immediately after >the last bit was transmitted. Then It checks the error/received bits and >strips it off the ring. How could it work full duplex unless there were >two tokens on the ring? > >Original Message Follows >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:59:22 -0700 > >The Dedicated Token Ring port adapter (PA-4R-DTR) is available on Cisco >7500 series routers, Cisco 7200 series routers, and Cisco 7000 series >routers with the 7000 Series Route Switch Processor (RSP7000) and 7000 >Series Chassis Interface (RSP7000CI). > >The PA-4R-DTR provides up to four IBM Token Ring or IEEE 802.5 Token Ring >interfaces. Each Token Ring interface can be set for 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps >half-duplex or full-duplex operation and can operate as a standard Token >Ring station or as a concentrator port. The default for all interfaces is >Token Ring station mode with half-duplex 16-Mbps operation. The PA-4R-DTR >connects over Type 1 lobe or Type 3 lobe cables, with each interface >providing an RJ-45 receptacle. > >So, Token Ring does have a "full-duplex" operation. I guess you would use >it on back-to-back links, just like you use full-duplex Ethernet on >back-to-back links. > >Priscilla > >At 05:13 PM 10/17/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >>Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex settings do not apply in a Token ring environment. >> >>Duplex settings deterrmine whether or not a system can recieve and >>transmit at the smae time in a CSMA/_C_ollision _D_etect (Ethernet) >>environment. >>Token Ring Does not use CSMA/CD, but use token-passing instead. >> >>On a Token Ring network, only one system transmits at a time, all of the >>others listen. >> >> >>Original Message Follows >>From: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Token ring and duplex >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:07:16 GMT >> >>If a token ring is running at a speed of 16, should the duplex be full or >>half. If it's at half, what may be some problems as a result of it. >>thanks. >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Employment Opportunity
It will be great maybe they could ask them some tech questions too. Duck - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 9:45 AM Subject: Re: Employment Opportunity > As opposed to those UN-certified CCIE's I suppose. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > We are looking for certified CCIE's to work in our MN or MA offices. If > > you know of anyone interested in exploring opportunities, please ask them > > to check us out http://www.us.bull.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Re: Employment Opportunity]
Why would anyone even reply to an individual who doesn't even understand the certification?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As opposed to those UN-certified CCIE's I suppose. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > We are looking for certified CCIE's to work in our MN or MA offices. If > > you know of anyone interested in exploring opportunities, please ask them > > to check us out http://www.us.bull.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSCN
If you go back a few days (starting Saturday morning) I have made a few comments on the same book. So far, on my first read, it doesn't rate very high. As far as a study guide for the BSCN exam I would not count on it. I know I will be using Internet Routing Architecture by Halabi (Second Edition) for BGP and at least Jeff Doyle's "bible" on TCP/IP for OSPF I am half way through chapter 8 (bgp) and it is good for an intro to bgp. I did like the "intro" to OSPF also from chapter 5 and 6. But this is all I will call it "an intro". It lacks way too much "flow" and there is not nearly enough diagram/example of real configuration. However ther is a very good description of the output of the "show commands" for OSPF. Just a man's point of view! Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 318DDAE1E5E9D311A63C00508B9B22FA3F053E@LON2">news:318DDAE1E5E9D311A63C00508B9B22FA3F053E@LON2... > Hi guys Has any one read this book for his Exams, how good is it > Building Scalable Cisco Networks > by Thomas M. Thomas II Tan Nam-Kee > George A > > > > DISCLAIMER > This e-mail is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and > may be confidential. If you are not an addressee you must not read it and > must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person > other than TeleCity Limited or the addressees of its existence or contents. > If you have received this email and are not a named addressee, please delete > it and notify the TeleCity IT department on 0161 226 7643 or by email at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Token ring and duplex
At 01:18 PM 10/18/00, Louie Belt wrote: > Since time immemorial and pre-industrial, 'greed' has been the > accusation >hurled at the rich by the concrete-bound illiterates who were unable to >conceive of the source of wealth or of the motivation of those who produce >it. > -- Ayn Rand Could we change this to: Since time immemorial and pre-industrial, "silly" has been the accusation hurled at the knowledgeable by the concrete-bound illiterates who were unable to conceive of the source of Cisco certification or the motivation of those who seek it. Couldn't resist. &;-) Priscilla >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 12:47 PM >To: Ejay Hire; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex > > >It's not "real" token ring. &;-) Seriously. Full-duplex Ethernet isn't real >CSMA/CD either. > >The more we learn, the less we know! Argh. > >Priscilla > >At 08:36 AM 10/18/00, Ejay Hire wrote: > >Okay,now I'm Confuzzled. A Token ring Frame is timed so that the first > >bit of a MTU sized frame returns to the Sending station immediately after > >the last bit was transmitted. Then It checks the error/received bits and > >strips it off the ring. How could it work full duplex unless there were > >two tokens on the ring? > > > >Original Message Follows > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex > >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:59:22 -0700 > > > >The Dedicated Token Ring port adapter (PA-4R-DTR) is available on Cisco > >7500 series routers, Cisco 7200 series routers, and Cisco 7000 series > >routers with the 7000 Series Route Switch Processor (RSP7000) and 7000 > >Series Chassis Interface (RSP7000CI). > > > >The PA-4R-DTR provides up to four IBM Token Ring or IEEE 802.5 Token Ring > >interfaces. Each Token Ring interface can be set for 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps > >half-duplex or full-duplex operation and can operate as a standard Token > >Ring station or as a concentrator port. The default for all interfaces is > >Token Ring station mode with half-duplex 16-Mbps operation. The PA-4R-DTR > >connects over Type 1 lobe or Type 3 lobe cables, with each interface > >providing an RJ-45 receptacle. > > > >So, Token Ring does have a "full-duplex" operation. I guess you would use > >it on back-to-back links, just like you use full-duplex Ethernet on > >back-to-back links. > > > >Priscilla > > > >At 05:13 PM 10/17/00, Ejay Hire wrote: > >>Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex settings do not apply in a Token ring environment. > >> > >>Duplex settings deterrmine whether or not a system can recieve and > >>transmit at the smae time in a CSMA/_C_ollision _D_etect (Ethernet) > >>environment. > >>Token Ring Does not use CSMA/CD, but use token-passing instead. > >> > >>On a Token Ring network, only one system transmits at a time, all of the > >>others listen. > >> > >> > >>Original Message Follows > >>From: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Reply-To: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Token ring and duplex > >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:07:16 GMT > >> > >>If a token ring is running at a speed of 16, should the duplex be full or > >>half. If it's at half, what may be some problems as a result of it. > >>thanks. > >>_ > >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >> > >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > >>http://profiles.msn.com. > >> > >>_ > >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>_ > >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >> > >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > >>http://profiles.msn.com. > >> > >>_ > >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer > >http://www.priscilla.com > > > >_ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >_ > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > >http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheime
Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
nope, can't say that I agree. perhaps CCNA "if" recruiters/hr people finally wake up and see that CCNA is an entry level cert (just talked about here lately) but CCNP/CCDP/CCIE certs are still being sought for various reasons. Cisco partners especially need certified people. Kevin Wigle CCDP/CCNP.. maybe a bit biased :-) - Original Message - From: "Terrence Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:54 PM Subject: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE > are of less and less importance because there > is such a short supply of people, employers no > better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface
No, It's the highest Ip on the router. Original Message Follows From: "John Deatherage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "John Deatherage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:15:27 -0700 If I add a loopback interface to a router, when will the router take it as the router ID? Here's a scenario: Serial2/1 is the current router ID: 209.1.1.1 I add Loopback0, which is 10.0.0.1 Shouldn't the router take this as its router ID? When does this happen? Doing: clear ip ospf process Still shows the old router ID. Is there any way to force the router to take the ID from the loopback interface? On another router, I couldn't get it to change until after reload. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token ring and duplex
That's it, I quit. Where are my tire changing tools? Original Message Follows From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:46:55 -0700 It's not "real" token ring. &;-) Seriously. Full-duplex Ethernet isn't real CSMA/CD either. The more we learn, the less we know! Argh. Priscilla At 08:36 AM 10/18/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >Okay,now I'm Confuzzled. A Token ring Frame is timed so that the first >bit of a MTU sized frame returns to the Sending station immediately after >the last bit was transmitted. Then It checks the error/received bits and >strips it off the ring. How could it work full duplex unless there were >two tokens on the ring? > >Original Message Follows >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:59:22 -0700 > >The Dedicated Token Ring port adapter (PA-4R-DTR) is available on Cisco >7500 series routers, Cisco 7200 series routers, and Cisco 7000 series >routers with the 7000 Series Route Switch Processor (RSP7000) and 7000 >Series Chassis Interface (RSP7000CI). > >The PA-4R-DTR provides up to four IBM Token Ring or IEEE 802.5 Token Ring >interfaces. Each Token Ring interface can be set for 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps >half-duplex or full-duplex operation and can operate as a standard Token >Ring station or as a concentrator port. The default for all interfaces is >Token Ring station mode with half-duplex 16-Mbps operation. The PA-4R-DTR >connects over Type 1 lobe or Type 3 lobe cables, with each interface >providing an RJ-45 receptacle. > >So, Token Ring does have a "full-duplex" operation. I guess you would use >it on back-to-back links, just like you use full-duplex Ethernet on >back-to-back links. > >Priscilla > >At 05:13 PM 10/17/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >>Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex settings do not apply in a Token ring environment. >> >>Duplex settings deterrmine whether or not a system can recieve and >>transmit at the smae time in a CSMA/_C_ollision _D_etect (Ethernet) >>environment. >>Token Ring Does not use CSMA/CD, but use token-passing instead. >> >>On a Token Ring network, only one system transmits at a time, all of the >>others listen. >> >> >>Original Message Follows >>From: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Token ring and duplex >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:07:16 GMT >> >>If a token ring is running at a speed of 16, should the duplex be full or >>half. If it's at half, what may be some problems as a result of it. >>thanks. >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Subject
Hello Everyone, I know I have seen a CCNP logo. Does andybody have it or know where I get it. Thanks for your help. Chuck Collins CCNP _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface
It will take the loopback address as it's ID, even if it is not the highest IP address on the router. Loopbacks take precedence over higher IP's with respect to Router ID's for OSPF. You will have to reboot your router for this change to be reflected. Once an ID is chosen, it will keep that ID regardless of changes until the router is rebooted. Louie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ejay Hire Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface No, It's the highest Ip on the router. Original Message Follows From: "John Deatherage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "John Deatherage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:15:27 -0700 If I add a loopback interface to a router, when will the router take it as the router ID? Here's a scenario: Serial2/1 is the current router ID: 209.1.1.1 I add Loopback0, which is 10.0.0.1 Shouldn't the router take this as its router ID? When does this happen? Doing: clear ip ospf process Still shows the old router ID. Is there any way to force the router to take the ID from the loopback interface? On another router, I couldn't get it to change until after reload. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COLT tests + CCDA
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/colt/ColtLogin.pl have fun. BTW, just got back from taking the CCDA.Passed, but those Case studies had me squirming in my chair! ;^) Cheers, Lance >From: "Niraj Palikhey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT tests >Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:00:23 EDT > >How would I take the Colt tests? Are these the same practise tests on the >Cisco web site that is for registered CCO users? I forget the url but does >anyone know the url? I would appreciate it. >Thank you. > > > >>From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 06:38:42 PDT >> >>Yes, If the COLT tests were tires, I'm afraid they would be Firestone >>Wilderness series...complete with the deflating effect >> >>(Sorry, couldn't help it). >> >>Lance >> >> >>>From: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:46:10 CDT >>> >>>Thank God its not just me. I took 2 of the Colts as a pre-assesment for >>>taking BCSN, and thought I had no chance of ever passing the real thing >>>and >>>should learn to change tires instead!! I feel a lot better knowing that >>>they really are as awful as I thought they were. >>> >>>Whew! >>>-Ejay >>> >>> >>>Original Message Follows >>>From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:27:34 PDT >>> >>>I think I have to agree. >>> >>>I took the CCDA COLT test yesterday, and to my dismay, despite using the >>>book for occational referance I missed 12 out of 52. The questions I >>>missed >>>were many of the questions I looked up in the book (DCN Cisco Press). >>>The >>>test contradicts the book often, and several times questions have >>>multiple >>>correct answers, not in which there is a "best answer" but there are >>>literaly several 100% correct answers for each question, and you are >>>allowed >>>to pick just one. It did open my eyes to some problem areas for me, but >>>this is not a route I would go for legitimate readiness evaluation. >>> >>>Cheers, >>> >>>Lance >>> >>> From: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: COLT tests Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:43:56 -0500 COLT testsMy opinion of them is that they only confuse the issue. I counted over 15 questions on the CIT-Pre exam that either had no correct answers listed or had wrong answers; I even took the test OPEN-BOOK to try to get through it. There is a very good reason that these questions are not on the real exam (badly-worded questions, no correct choices, nebulous questions, badly-worded answers, questions so detailed and obscure that they require a Cisco white paper or field notice to answer, etc.), and no one has made any attempt to improve them. What is amazing about some of them is that they are direct mis-quotes from some of the Cisco-Press books, and some were paraphrased incorrectly and unintentionally changed the meaning. It is my belief that these questions were not written by Cisco but rather some hired third-party who didn't understand the material they were asking about (let's hope that this is the case, or else they are a real embarrassment to Cisco!). I had to inform Cisco that the CIT-8/28 exam wasn't even showing the gifs (they have since fixed that at least). Don't use this resourse to make a decision on whether you are ready for the real exam, just use it as a reference to make sure that you have covered the material. The real exam has a few nebulous questions, but not to the extent that the assessment exams do. Regards, MLC "Lonnie Paschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... They are practice beta exams that are avaialable to cco login users. No charge, excellent rescource! "Ricardo Ciganda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01">news:C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01... Hi all! I would like to know what is the finality of the COLT tests. May I have to paid for this or is only a simulation of a test? Thanks in advance. Ricardo Ciganda Dpto. de Sistemas Bytemaster Servicios Informaticos S.A. >>> >>>_ >>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >>> >>>Share information about yourself,
Re: BCMSN fill in the blank questions?
Actually BCMSN does not supply you with an exhibit to choose commands from. (BCRAN is the test that supplies the exhibit). I passed BCMSN in late August, BCMSN only had a few fill in the blank questions and they were not difficult. --Scott Brad Nixon wrote: > The exhibits supply you with a plethora of choices. > Brad > ""Timothy W. Roberts"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Does this test have a exhibit box that has choices or is straight from > > memory? > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Token ring and duplex
Just Call 1-800-USTRUCK. You TOO can become an over the road truck driver. No Experience Necessary. Will Train. Obtain the CTIE (Certified Trucking Interstate Expert) ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ejay Hire Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex That's it, I quit. Where are my tire changing tools? Original Message Follows From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:46:55 -0700 It's not "real" token ring. &;-) Seriously. Full-duplex Ethernet isn't real CSMA/CD either. The more we learn, the less we know! Argh. Priscilla At 08:36 AM 10/18/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >Okay,now I'm Confuzzled. A Token ring Frame is timed so that the first >bit of a MTU sized frame returns to the Sending station immediately after >the last bit was transmitted. Then It checks the error/received bits and >strips it off the ring. How could it work full duplex unless there were >two tokens on the ring? > >Original Message Follows >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Token ring and duplex >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:59:22 -0700 > >The Dedicated Token Ring port adapter (PA-4R-DTR) is available on Cisco >7500 series routers, Cisco 7200 series routers, and Cisco 7000 series >routers with the 7000 Series Route Switch Processor (RSP7000) and 7000 >Series Chassis Interface (RSP7000CI). > >The PA-4R-DTR provides up to four IBM Token Ring or IEEE 802.5 Token Ring >interfaces. Each Token Ring interface can be set for 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps >half-duplex or full-duplex operation and can operate as a standard Token >Ring station or as a concentrator port. The default for all interfaces is >Token Ring station mode with half-duplex 16-Mbps operation. The PA-4R-DTR >connects over Type 1 lobe or Type 3 lobe cables, with each interface >providing an RJ-45 receptacle. > >So, Token Ring does have a "full-duplex" operation. I guess you would use >it on back-to-back links, just like you use full-duplex Ethernet on >back-to-back links. > >Priscilla > >At 05:13 PM 10/17/00, Ejay Hire wrote: >>Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex settings do not apply in a Token ring environment. >> >>Duplex settings deterrmine whether or not a system can recieve and >>transmit at the smae time in a CSMA/_C_ollision _D_etect (Ethernet) >>environment. >>Token Ring Does not use CSMA/CD, but use token-passing instead. >> >>On a Token Ring network, only one system transmits at a time, all of the >>others listen. >> >> >>Original Message Follows >>From: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Token ring and duplex >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:07:16 GMT >> >>If a token ring is running at a speed of 16, should the duplex be full or >>half. If it's at half, what may be some problems as a result of it. >>thanks. >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>_ >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >> >>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >>http://profiles.msn.com. >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco
Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
Well, Logically what you all are saying makes sense. A cert can't hurt. But if you go to monster board and type in a cert, (say CCNP or CCIE) versus typing in Cisco ; you will find many more jobs that require the skill with no mention of the certification. An when I talk to recruiters, rarely do they mention anything about certification. I have friends that are recruiters and they don't know anything about certifications. If I'm looking in the wrong places, where do I go to find value for my Cisco certification and experience. Which job sites, which companies, et cetera ? >From: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Terrence Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks >Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:50:58 -0400 > >nope, can't say that I agree. > >perhaps CCNA "if" recruiters/hr people finally wake up and see that CCNA is >an entry level cert (just talked about here lately) > >but CCNP/CCDP/CCIE certs are still being sought for various reasons. Cisco >partners especially need certified people. > >Kevin Wigle >CCDP/CCNP.. maybe a bit biased :-) > >- Original Message - >From: "Terrence Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:54 PM >Subject: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > > > > I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE > > are of less and less importance because there > > is such a short supply of people, employers no > > better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? > > >_ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCN
I would recommend getting another book. This is first edition, and full of errors. Also, the book lacks explanation in some areas (gets confusing). What really bothers me the most about it is the fact that the IOS commands they show sometimes are wrong! Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BSCN Hi guys Has any one read this book for his Exams, how good is it Building Scalable Cisco Networks by Thomas M. Thomas II Tan Nam-Kee George A DISCLAIMER This e-mail is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and may be confidential. If you are not an addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than TeleCity Limited or the addressees of its existence or contents. If you have received this email and are not a named addressee, please delete it and notify the TeleCity IT department on 0161 226 7643 or by email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: appletalk on catalyst 5500 problem
Thank you to everyone who took the time to make suggestions. I seem to have fixed the problem, but I can't pinpoint exactly which command or configuration change worked the magic. As you suggested, I made sure that portfast was on, port channel was off, and that the ports were not set to trunk and the problem still persisted. The next step I took was to make sure the ports broadcast limit was at 100%(set port broadcast [%]). By default this should have, and apparently was, already set to 100%. But after I manually typed in the command the problem went away. And the real mindtwister is that the problem went away on ALL of the affected Macs in that VLAN(including on an upstream switch), not only the Mac on the interface I had specified. I'm guessing that something must have propagated all the way to the RSM. When the Macs boot up now they still get a window that says "Your AppleTalk network has become available". But it's just an FYI message. It doesn't require you to go into the AppleTalk control panel. Thank you for taking the time to write back, Dave >Hi again, > >A few last points before I sign off for the night: > >1) You do indeed have to ask your users to pay attention to the >error message and do as it says (open and close the Control Panel). >The person who told me it was just an FYI message was forgetting the >reality of working with AppleTalk. (It was my husband, who was >actually one of the creators of AppleTalk. He tends to forget bad >things about it. Just kidding.) > >2) The Apple white paper is indeed very vague about a real solution >to the problem. &;-) But the solution is that you have to tweak the >spanning tree parameters so that the switch ports don't take so long >to start forwarding packets. Bottom line: the router's (RSM's) >packets aren't getting through in time to the end nodes so they >think they are on an isolated network. Then when they finally hear >from the router, they put up that annoying message. Another solution >would be to upgrade to Mac OS X, it sounds like?! ;-] > >3) Having multiple seed routers is not a problem. (Even if you had >multiple seed routers, I mean, it wouldn't be a problem. Multiple >seed routers is a good thing.) > >Good luck! By the way, thank-you for buying my book. I hope you like >it. Talk to you later, > >Priscilla > >At 06:49 PM 10/16/00, Dave Redwood wrote: >>Thanks to everyone who sent a response. I'm sorry I didn't give more >>details when I wrote last night; I think I was just on the verge of going >>to sleep. >> >>The exact message was: >> >>"Your AppleTalk network has become available. To use the network, open the >>AppleTalk control panel, then close it. " >> >>So the users actually have to open the control panel in order to access >>other AppleTalk devices(even if they are in the same VLAN or segment). And >>no zones are displayed until after the control panel is opened and then >>closed. >> >> >>I've tried locking down the ports to all possible combinations of 10/100 >>half/full, setting the ports of the affected machines to portfast/regular >>STP implementations, and the problem still lingers. The only thing I have >>noticed in the last 24hrs is that the machines running OS-X beta aren't >>having the problem, those running OS9 and earlier are) >> >>We don't have multiple seed routers(but thx for suggesting it Chris!). >>Here's our layout: >> >>(multiple mac clients G3/G4/etc...) >> | >> | >> 100/full (But i've tried all possible combinations) >> | >> | >> Catalyst 5500a(VLAN 33) >> | >> | >> GigE-net >> | >> | >> Catalyst 5500b(VLAN 33) >> | >> | >> GigE-net >> | >> | >> Catalyst 5500c w/RSM ISL >> >>And the Apple TIL mentions this exact issue. However a clear solution isn't >>provided. But thank you for noting it(Priscilla) and finding the link for >>me(Daniel) it definitely is worth the read. >> >>Well, I think I'm stuck. But I'll keep working on the problem and let you >>know if I find a solution. >> >>Thank you *all*(Ian, Daniel, Chris and Priscilla) for taking the time to >>make the suggestions >> >>P.S.: Priscilla, I just started reading TDND and am loving it. I'm >>honored(I would try to find a more subtle word, but it's true) to have had >>your input on this issue. >> >> >>_ >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network neighborhood
Assuming file and print sharing is enabled on all workstations; if some computers show up in network neighborhood and some do not would the problem most likely be a master browser issue or WINS or something else. Thanks, Jeff Lodwick MCSE/CCNA _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is TDM full duplex or half duplex
Half/full duplexing goes back much further. Half duplex implies a shared media. Often only one can speak at a time. A good analogy would be radio communication where when one is done speaking they use a key word such as "over" to indicate that the other may speak. With full duplex both can simultaneously transmit. In telephony this often referred to a four wire circuit where the two wire circuit went to a hybrid coil circuit that converted it to four wire. Two for transmit, two for receive. Analog can amplify in one direction only - thus the need for four wire circuits for interoffice trunking. The next step is to modulate voice traffic with different carrier frequencies and multiplex the sum over the same four wires. The good news is that many calls can share the same wires. The bad news is that the amplifiers can't tell the difference between signal and noise. So long circuits have increased noise. The solution to noise was to digitize the signal and periodically regenerate it. Anything below a certain threshold is considered noise and is rejected. This was the beginning of TDM, Time Division Multiplexing, aka T-1s. > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Ezerski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 12:21 PM > To: 'Daniel Cotts' > Subject: RE: Is TDM full duplex or half duplex > > > Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't duplexing an > Ethernet-only concept? > > Joe > > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 9:02 AM > To: 'Jeff Lodwick'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Is TDM full duplex or half duplex > > > TDM to me means T-1 and similar technology. It is full duplex sending > seperate transmit and receive bit streams. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeff Lodwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 8:48 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Is TDM full duplex or half duplex > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > Does anyone know if Time Division Multiplexing will work with > > only half > > duplexing or only full duplexing or both. Jeff Lodwick MCSE/CCNA > > __ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
Lets not forget that Partners receive benes for their Associate level people as well Kevin ;-) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Kevin Wigle > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:51 PM > To: Terrence Garrison; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > > > nope, can't say that I agree. > > perhaps CCNA "if" recruiters/hr people finally wake up and see > that CCNA is > an entry level cert (just talked about here lately) > > but CCNP/CCDP/CCIE certs are still being sought for various > reasons. Cisco > partners especially need certified people. > > Kevin Wigle > CCDP/CCNP.. maybe a bit biased :-) > > - Original Message - > From: "Terrence Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:54 PM > Subject: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > > > > I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE > > are of less and less importance because there > > is such a short supply of people, employers no > > better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCRAN EXAM 640-505
I am looking at getting the CiscoPress book by Catherine Paquet ISBN # 1578700914, published 1999. This seems to be the only CP book available at the moment. Can anyone tell me if it is current for the new exam ? Thanks. Carl. " Integrity Can Be Communicated" , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky TSC Sprint ENS 5600 N. River Rd. #750 Chicago, IL 60018 Pager # 1-800-816-9986 Office # 1-847-318-3960 Cellular # 630-747-7925 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Employment Opportunity
The UN are Facists {off soapbox}
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> ElephantChild
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 3:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Employment Opportunity
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > As opposed to those UN-certified CCIE's I suppose.
>
> *blink* Since when does the UN have anything to do with cisco
> certifications?
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > We are looking for certified CCIE's to work in our MN or MA
> offices. If
> > > you know of anyone interested in exploring opportunities,
> please ask them
> > > to check us out http://www.us.bull.com
>
> --
> Bungee jumping and skydiving are for wimps. If you want to experience
> true gut-wrenching terror, have children. --Dusty Rhoades.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network neighborhood
Jeffs right, Check your WINS settings ;-< > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jeff Lodwick > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 3:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Network neighborhood > > > Assuming file and print sharing is enabled on all workstations; if some > computers show up in network neighborhood and some do not would > the problem > most likely be a master browser issue or WINS or something else. Thanks, > Jeff Lodwick MCSE/CCNA > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP Unnumbered.
You could use ip unnumbered on loopback interface though , in this way when the lan segment is down you can still have the loopback interface suaveguru --- "Brian W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is one huge disadvantage. If the ether > segment goes down in an ip > unnumbered setup, then even if everything is > physically ok on the serial > link associated, that serial link will become > unusable. From a monitoring > perspective, unnumbered is a bad idea. I suspect > some people use it to > save ip space. > > Brian > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Gunjan Mathur at 9netave wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Can somebody tell me Advantages & disadvantages of > system. > > > > > > TIA > > > > Gm. > > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: line protocol down
Not many clues given though but from what you say it seems logical that you should check the status of your serial interface see if there are many input errors or crc errors if there are check the clock rate of your modem otherwise check the status of the other party that you are connected to to see if they were down however you can also confirm that your interface port is ok but putting keepalives equal to 0 to see that the status is up up suaveguru --- Rayappa Mayakunthala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have this problem with my 2503. The line protocol > goes down consistently. > If I reset the modem (CSU/DSU) or reload the router, > the line protocol comes > up. And then it goes down after few minutes/hours > and history repeats. I > couldn't nail down the problem. Any clues? > > Thanks, > Rayappa. > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the > person or entity to which > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > privileged material. > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other > use of, or taking of any > action in reliance upon, this information by persons > or entities other than the intended recipient is > prohibited. > If you received this in error, please contact the > sender and delete the materialfrom any computer. > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
Also, Cisco partners need people with certifications, as already pointed out. Bri On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Bradley J. Wilson wrote: > There may be some truth to what you're saying, but the certifications > certainly will continue to have an impact on that person's starting salary. > > > - Original Message - > From: Terrence Garrison > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:54 PM > Subject: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > > > I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE > are of less and less importance because there > is such a short supply of people, employers no > better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network neighborhood
perhaps file and printer sharing is not enabled on some?? Bri On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Jeff Lodwick wrote: > Assuming file and print sharing is enabled on all workstations; if some > computers show up in network neighborhood and some do not would the problem > most likely be a master browser issue or WINS or something else. Thanks, > Jeff Lodwick MCSE/CCNA > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks
you're absolutely correct! sorry if I stepped on anybody's feelings - (I was an "Associate" once!) Kevin - Original Message - From: "William E Gragido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Terrence Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 4:28 PM Subject: RE: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > Lets not forget that Partners receive benes for their Associate level people > as well Kevin ;-) > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Kevin Wigle > > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:51 PM > > To: Terrence Garrison; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > > > > > > nope, can't say that I agree. > > > > perhaps CCNA "if" recruiters/hr people finally wake up and see > > that CCNA is > > an entry level cert (just talked about here lately) > > > > but CCNP/CCDP/CCIE certs are still being sought for various > > reasons. Cisco > > partners especially need certified people. > > > > Kevin Wigle > > CCDP/CCNP.. maybe a bit biased :-) > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Terrence Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:54 PM > > Subject: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks > > > > > > > I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE > > > are of less and less importance because there > > > is such a short supply of people, employers no > > > better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ? > > > > > _ > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Books for BSCN
Team, Is there any book that I could go and buy right now for this test Thanks
Re:
Go up on the Galton site and download it. Same place where you agreed to your NDA before being awarded your CCNP. They have recently changed if anyone had the "old" ones. http://www.galton.com/~cisco/ Kevin Wigle CCDP/CCNP.. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 3:19 PM > Hello Everyone, > I know I have seen a CCNP logo. > Does andybody have it or know where I get it. > Thanks for your help. > > Chuck Collins > CCNP > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network neighborhood
load netbeui or setup LMHOST filethen it will work _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface
Some minor corrections. The OSPF process will use the *highest* loopback IP address if a loopback interface is configured. Otherwise, it uses the *highest* IP address on a physical interface. To configure OSPF (router ospf x) you need a interface with IP to be in a up/up state. You can reboot to have the router ID reflected or you can remove the OSPF process and add it back. --- Louie Belt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It will take the loopback address as it's ID, even > if it is not the highest > IP address on the router. Loopbacks take precedence > over higher IP's with > respect to Router ID's for OSPF. You will have to > reboot your router for > this change to be reflected. Once an ID is chosen, > it will keep that ID > regardless of changes until the router is rebooted. > > Louie > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Ejay Hire > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface > > > No, It's the highest Ip on the router. > > > Original Message Follows > From: "John Deatherage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "John Deatherage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: OSPF Router ID/Loopback interface > Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:15:27 -0700 > > If I add a loopback interface to a router, when will > the router take it as > the router ID? Here's a scenario: > > Serial2/1 is the current router ID: 209.1.1.1 > > I add Loopback0, which is 10.0.0.1 > > Shouldn't the router take this as its router ID? > When does this happen? > Doing: > > clear ip ospf process > > Still shows the old router ID. Is there any way to > force the router to take > the ID from the loopback interface? On another > router, I couldn't get it to > change until after reload. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own > public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCN
Lots of errors. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 19 October 2000 03:49 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: BSCN > > Hi guys Has any one read this book for his Exams, how good is it > Building Scalable Cisco Networks > by Thomas M. Thomas II Tan Nam-Kee > George A > > > > DISCLAIMER > This e-mail is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and > may be confidential. If you are not an addressee you must not read it and > must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any > person > other than TeleCity Limited or the addressees of its existence or > contents. > If you have received this email and are not a named addressee, please > delete > it and notify the TeleCity IT department on 0161 226 7643 or by email at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] CAUTION This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressee. The confidentiality and/or privilege in this e-mail is not waived, lost or destroyed if it has been transmitted to you in error. If you received this e-mail in error you must (a) not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it; (b) please notify Australia Post immediately by return e-mail to the sender; (c) please delete the original e-mail. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst- Resolving the Physical Port
Hey guys- I'm stumped... Yesterday I installed a Ethernet probe on a Catalyst 6509. I needed to watch a VLAN, due to a high rate of collisions within a subnet. I didn't use the Probe's tap (which is a hub device). I ran the management connection (which has an IP) & the probe connection (listening side) into the 6509. I had connectivity & could Ping from the Ethernet probe out, so I figured the rest could be done remotely. Now I'm 2 hours away from the site & I need to figure out what connection on the VLAN (the one I want to monitor) is the uplink to the router (what Slot/ Port). I need to issue the "Set Span" command, making TAP port on the 6509, a listening port to the uplink port (much like a hub would have done). How do I see the physical connections from the CLI ??? If all else fails- tomorrow I'll turn on CDP Neighbors @ the router & see what I see... Thanks !!! Phil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network neighborhood
You have to have a Master Browser on every segment of a routed network. You will also have to use the "ip helper-address" command so that WINS and DHCP requests are forwarded correctly. Chris Lemagie Systems Engineer Cisco Systems Seattle Commercial Region (425) 468-0959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cisco.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeff Lodwick Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Network neighborhood Assuming file and print sharing is enabled on all workstations; if some computers show up in network neighborhood and some do not would the problem most likely be a master browser issue or WINS or something else. Thanks, Jeff Lodwick MCSE/CCNA _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
