Re: CCIE Security Results?

[Javier Contreras]

Hi

No yet, expect them to 2-3rd week of december...

regards

Aaron Moreau-Cook wrote:
> 
> Has anyone received their CCIE Security (Beta) results yet?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
---
Javier Contreras Albesa
Standard Trainer

PRO IN Training S.L.
PROfessional Information Networks
World Trade Center, Moll de Barcelona S/N
Edif Sur, Planta 4

Phone: (+34) 93-5088850 E-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax:  (+34) 93-5088860 Internet:  http:// www.proin.com

SHAPING THE FUTURE - BE PART OF IT!

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tough VPN question

[Robert DeVito]

 
Did you try an LMHOST file to specify the name and IP address of the domain 
controller?
 
Robert

Original Message Follows 
From: Jim Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Jim Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: tough VPN question 
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 22:18:56 -0800 (PST) 

Hello, 

I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch 
office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch 
office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working 
fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives 
from/to central office. The problem is they can't 
logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller 
though. 

Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The 
machines were already added to domain) 

Thanks in advance. 


Jim 

__ 
Do You Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. 
http://shopping.yahoo.com/ 

___ 
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: 
unsubscribe ccielab 
Robert DeVitoGet more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer 
download : http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CCNA Study guides

[JLBCisco]

I thought the cd in the Wendal Odom CCNA guide was excellent, though I also 
used Todd Lammle's Study Guide and cd which I thought was closer to the real 
test.  Review well and take the test; it didn't seem that tricky to me at 
all, just covered a lot of new territory.

Joe Buchberger

> im gettin ready to take my CCNA and im using the CCNA Certification Guide
>  Companion from Cisco Press on the prac tests I'm getting well into the 90's
>  every time. Is this a good indicator of how well the test will go for me or
>  should I be lookin at other options ..
>  
>  
>  thanks
>  Christopher D. Marshall

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: tough VPN question

[Gils]

Hi,

  Does the network configured to work with the 10.x.x.x addresses as a C
class ?
If you do it sometimes cause a lot of problems with NBT so just for argument
sake try configuring two computers with a true C class or a True B class and
than try.

 I hope it helps 
   Gil

-Original Message-
From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ??? ? 07 ? 2000 08:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tough VPN question


Hello,

I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
from/to central office. The problem is they can't
logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
though.

Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
machines were already added to domain)

Thanks in advance.


Jim

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

dream lab

[nandit]

Hi,
I was trying to figure out a dream lab setup for covering ccna,np,ie and
other cisco certs.could u please add your thopughts on this.
Thanks
nandit


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NTP in an Enterprise Network

[Robert O'Brien]

To minimise traffic on WAN links, point the ntp to the next hop router
back towards the
ntp server, then only the first router in a site needs to ntp across the
WAN withothers
syncing to it.

Rob O'Brien
CCNA
Canberra Australia

"Rossetti, Stan" wrote:

> You can also source off of the internal calendar clock if you have 7200
> series router in your network and therefore would not need an NTP server.
>
> Thanks
>
> Stan Rossetti
>
> Russia Services Group
> Voice:  (256) 544-5031
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Beeper:  544-5031 pin 0112
>
> CCDA, CCNA, CCSE
>
>  -Original Message-
> From:   SAM Meng Wai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:   Wednesday, December 06, 2000 1:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:RE: NTP in an Enterprise Network
>
> You can setup an NTP Server on a unix machine and let all
> your routers sync to this NTP server by configure the following commands
> in your routers. Make sure you have a accurate timing in your server.
>
> ntp clock-period 17179860
> ntp server 10.200.2.10
>
> Hope this will ans your questions
>
> Rgds,
> Sam
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Circusnuts [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:11 AM
> > To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:  NTP in an Enterprise Network
> >
> > Can anyone share NTP implementation successes in an Enterprise scenario.
> > It's my latest assignment @ work & I have a good idea what I want to
> > accomplish, just looking for a some lessons learned.
> >
> > Thanks All !!!
> > Phil
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What cisco router platforms are usually deployed for BGP full routes(ie, 75000) ?

[Jaeheon Yoo]

Hi, 

while I'm reading Halabi's book, I'm getting curious.

Please let me know what cisco router platforms are usually deployed
for BGP full routes? In addition to that, what are platforms for
partial routes and for default routes only?

Thanks in advance.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

how does traffic from CAT55 switch moule to Route switch module( RSM)?

[Sim, CT (Chee Tong)]

Dear all,

1)I have a cat 55 switch which got 2 X 10/100BaseTX Ethernet module and 1 X
Route Switch Module (RSM), so, I have 48 ports on the switches module and
divided into 3 VLANs some of ports were set to VLAN 1, 2 3, and the RSM
module is connect thru our WAN router to world, and RSM, the layer 3 device
is used to route the traffic between VLANs but I don't know how does the
traffic from the switches module do to RSM module as there is no cable
connection or it do internally?

2)I found my RSM module is configured 3 VLANs inteface, 100.100.100.99,
100.100.200.99, 100.100.300.99, but I can't see there are phyiscal
interface. Why?

Below shown the conf, sometarou is the switch module and SOMETAROU is the
RSM module 


sometarou> sh cdp nei
* - indicates vlan mismatch.
# - indicates duplex mismatch.
Port Device-ID   Port-ID   Platform
 --- -

 2/1 SOMETAROU   Vlan1 cisco
RSP2
 3/1 066506067(somenosuke)   3/1   WS-C5505
 3/2 066506067(somenosuke)   3/2   WS-C5505
 3/3 066506067(somenosuke)   3/3   WS-C5505
 3/4 066506067(somenosuke)   3/4   WS-C5505
sometarou> session 2
Trying Router-2...
Connected to Router-2.
Escape character is '^]'.


* Catalyst 5505 #2 *
* RSM WS-X5302 *
*SOMETAROU *



User Access Verification

Password:
SOMETAROU>sh cdp nei
Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
  S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater

Device IDLocal Intrfce HoldtmeCapability  Platform  Port ID
066507401(sometarou)Vlan1  132 T B S  WS-C5505  2/1
SOMETAROU>

==
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
==
The information contained in this message may be confidential 
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


==

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: how does traffic from CAT55 switch moule to Route switchmodu le (RSM)?

[Sim, CT (Chee Tong)]

Sorry , I send again, as I want to add one more question


Dear all,

1)I have a cat 55 switch which got 2 X 10/100BaseTX Ethernet module and 1 X
Route Switch Module (RSM), so, I have 48 ports on the switches module and
divided into 3 VLANs some of ports were set to VLAN 1, 2 3, and the RSM
module is connect thru our WAN router to world, and RSM, the layer 3 device
is used to route the traffic between VLANs but I don't know how does the
traffic from the switches module do to RSM module as there is no cable
connection or it do internally?

2)I found my RSM module is configured 3 VLANs inteface, 100.100.100.99,
100.100.200.99, 100.100.300.99, but I can't see there are phyiscal
interface. Why?

Below shown the conf, sometarou is the switch module and SOMETAROU is the
RSM module 

3)From the sh cdp nei configuration in the switch module below, I wonder why
only VLAN1 connect to RSM module, I thought we configured VLANs 1 2 3 in
switches module


sometarou> sh cdp nei
* - indicates vlan mismatch.
# - indicates duplex mismatch.
Port Device-ID   Port-ID   Platform
 --- -

 2/1 SOMETAROU   Vlan1 cisco
RSP2
 3/1 066506067(somenosuke)   3/1   WS-C5505
 3/2 066506067(somenosuke)   3/2   WS-C5505
 3/3 066506067(somenosuke)   3/3   WS-C5505
 3/4 066506067(somenosuke)   3/4   WS-C5505
sometarou> session 2
Trying Router-2...
Connected to Router-2.
Escape character is '^]'.


* Catalyst 5505 #2 *
* RSM WS-X5302 *
*SOMETAROU *



User Access Verification

Password:
SOMETAROU>sh cdp nei
Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
  S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater

Device IDLocal Intrfce HoldtmeCapability  Platform  Port ID
066507401(sometarou)Vlan1  132 T B S  WS-C5505  2/1
SOMETAROU>

==
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
==
The information contained in this message may be confidential 
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


==

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

No Subject

[Ravi Kumar]

dear friends

can any body tell me URL for CISCO online Tests (COLT)

regards
ravee





Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tough VPN question

[Chad Marsh]

Make sure you have either WINS or lmhost files. Make sure the router IOS is
12.1(3) or later. Turn of CEF if it's on.
You say the clients can map network drives, can they browse Network
Neighborhood?
Are the clients NT or 95/98? You say email works, is it Outlook/Exchange or
POP?

Chad Marsh
CCIE # 5185

- Original Message -
From: "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 10:18 PM
Subject: tough VPN question


> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> though.
>
> Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> machines were already added to domain)
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Jim
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> unsubscribe ccielab
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Wireless Networking

[Andy Walden]

Thats a silly comment. They compete directly and have very similar product
lines. As a side note, I happen to prefer Foundry due to my past
experiences and it does deliver better bang for the buck and features at
wire speed (ie, that don't melt the router if you turn them on). Juniper
does also. Cisco may figure it out one day, or just continue to hemorage
market share. 

andy

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Perry Lucas wrote:

> I am a bit curious myself on that.  Foundry is more oriented to webfarms and
> load balancing while extreme is oriented to Enterprise datacenters and MANs.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> LaRoy Slaughter
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Wireless Networking
> 
> 
> 
> Please explain your choice here.
> 
> Quncy Lau wrote:
> 
> > If you don't need VLAN and VLAN routing. I suggest Catalyst 6509.
> > If you need VLAN and VLAN routing, I suggest you not to use Cisco.
> > Let's try Extreme or Foundry
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tough VPN question

[Johnny Gorham]

Jim,

Make sure that your Pix is allowing the NBT. If not open a port for it.
Also, if you are not using WINS, configure an ip helper address.

Jim Bond wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> though.
>
> Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> machines were already added to domain)
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Jim
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> unsubscribe ccielab

--
--
Johnny Gorham
MCNE_NT, CNE_5, CCNA
Customer Support Engineer
Phone: 919-392-6893
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RTP TAC
Research Triangle Park, NC
--



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IBD

[Atef Rostom]

If you meanIDB, the following is from "Designing Cisco Networks" Module2,
Section 3


Interface Description Blocks (IDBs) provide a central location in memory for
storing information about network interface cards for use by driver code. An
IDB must be able to represent all kinds of interfaces, including
subinterfaces. Therefore, IDB data structures use a lot of memory. To avoid
problems with memory usage, the Cisco IOS software limits the number of
IDBs.
The current IDB limit is 300. Each physical interface on the router, whether
it is configured or not, and whether it is active or shut down, uses up one
IDB.

Each configured channel on a channelized interface (such as the MIP) uses
one IDB. For example, if a MIP T1 port has 24 configured channels, the
interface uses a total of 24 IDBs.

Each configured subinterface also uses one IDB. For example, if an FSIP port
configured for Frame Relay has 10 configured subinterfaces, the interface
uses up a total of 11 IDBs (one for the physical interface and one each for
the subinterfaces).

Only the subinterfaces use IDBs, not Frame Relay permanent virtual circuits
(PVCs). For example, if a Frame Relay interface has ten PVCs, but does not
use any subinterfaces, it uses only a single IDB. If a Frame Relay interface
has two subinterfaces each terminating five PVCs (for a total of ten PVCs at
the interface), it uses three IDBs.



"John W. Redmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hey everyone,
>
> What does IBD represent in a cisco environment?
>
> Thanks,
>
> JOHN
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CCSI question

[Neil Schneider]

The training center I work at does this also.  We are partnered with an
official Cisco training provider that supplies the instructors.  Perfectly
allowable.

--
Neil Schneider
MCT MCSE+I CCNA


"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> We have a training facility in my town.
>
> They are *not* a Cisco Authorized Training Partner.
>
> They bring in a guy from out of state who is a CCSI.  He teaches some
> classes, and then heads back.
>
> Are CCSI's allowed to do this?  My understanding was that a CCSI was not
> allowed to do side jobs/unauthorized training at non-cisco training
> centers, and only suppose to teach where they are assigned.
>
> Brian
>
>
> ---
> Brian Feeny, CCNP+ATM, CCDP   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Administrator
> ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re:

[A. Geoffrey Cauchi]

A look in the archives shows:

http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/colt/ColtLogin.pl

Geoff

- Original Message -
From: "Ravi Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:43 PM


> dear friends
>
> can any body tell me URL for CISCO online Tests (COLT)
>
> regards
> ravee
>
>
>
>
> 
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE:

[Fowler, Joey]

http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/colt/ColtLogin.pl

Watch the wrap. You will need a CCO login. If you don't have one see
messages within the last day, someone listed how to get one.

Joey

-Original Message-
From: Ravi Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 


dear friends

can any body tell me URL for CISCO online Tests (COLT)

regards
ravee





Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tough VPN question

[Francis Gibbons]

You are not NAT'ing the clients to the Domain Controller are you? I think
you are by the fact that the branch office shares 1 IP address.
Domain Logon can NOT be NAT'd while SMB/CIFS can be (ie map drives)

Francis Gibbons
Network Architect, CCSI, CCNP, CNE, MCSE
Global Knowledge Network (Canada)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:18 AM
Subject: tough VPN question


> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> though.
>
> Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> machines were already added to domain)
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Jim
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> unsubscribe ccielab
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Access list & chat

[Very Gentle Guy]

Dear all,

I need to restrict my users to be able to use all chat sevrices and have no 
browsing or ftp things, how do you think i can built my access list to do 
so?

Do I have to mention host addresses or I can control it through opening 
access to specific ports only>

Thanks for your help
Ref
_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What cisco router platforms are usually deployed for BGP full routes(ie, 75000) ?

[Evan Francen]

Cisco recommends that in order to accept full BGP tables, you should have a
minimum of 128MB of RAM.  The smallest router in the Cisco line that
supports this much RAM is a 3640 (7200 and 12000 would also work fine,
obviously).  For partial routes, it depends on how "partial."  Some ISPs
won't give you the option.  I would not go with anything less than a 3600
series.  For default route, it depends on the traffic/options you want to
employ.  A 2500, 2600, 3600, etc. would work fine.

My 2 cents.

Evan

-Original Message-
From: Jaeheon Yoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What cisco router platforms are usually deployed for BGP full
routes(ie, 75000) ?


Hi, 

while I'm reading Halabi's book, I'm getting curious.

Please let me know what cisco router platforms are usually deployed
for BGP full routes? In addition to that, what are platforms for
partial routes and for default routes only?

Thanks in advance.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE:

[Evan Francen]

http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/colt/ColtLogin.pl

-Original Message-
From: Ravi Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 6:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 


dear friends

can any body tell me URL for CISCO online Tests (COLT)

regards
ravee





Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Off Topic - Ask Miss Manners - Protocol and Behaviour

[Bradley J. Wilson]

> Also, how do I keep from hurting myself nodding my head in agreement with
> said guru?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Chuck

Chuck, you could always try *disagreeing*, then see how much *that* hurts.
;-)

Just putting things in perspective,

BJ  (1/4 CCNP as of Tuesday!)



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Wireless Networking

[Rob Mears (c)]

-Original Message-
From: Quncy Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wireless Networking


Dude, lot of people read these post so please be right when you do post.

> Would wireless technology be a possibility?

***RHM We have a huge network, with Cisco switch 5500, 6509, 8500, every
type of router from the very small to the 7500.
I have deployed 11mbs wireless through out this origination and it works
fine. It is true it is limited by distance (500ft) but you solve this by
placing your wireless access points to cover all areas and over lap each
other. The new format we are testing at 22mbs and in about 8 month the 54
mbs version will arrive.  This is a great solution and will make you shine
with your CFO. The new Access points we are testing will do layer 4 QOS, IP
routing, IGMP snooping VoIP , 100 node multi point telnet EAP security, just
to mane a few.
It goes thru all walls, I have my access points place in the wire closets
and I know our users are not there. I have also found transmission going two
floors down into the buildings lobby. Thank god for 128 bit encryption.

And just for the record I totally disagree with your reference to the vlan
routing and the 6509. Do you know they will do layer 4 switching?  The 6509
is a awesome switch with lots of compatibilities. Have you even worked with
one? It comes with the NFFC card and already will route at layer 3.  Please
clarify.

Be 100% sure before giving advice, nothing worse then being wrong in front
of the world.


Rob Mears III, NNCSS, NNCDS, MCSE, CNE, CCNA, A+
Technical Mercenary
Sprint Enterprise Network Services
Allied Riser



Sure, your place is idle for that
all the machine are close, in a single floor.

> Would it be cheaper in the long run to just rerun homeruns to a
centralized
> switch and stay wired?

Depends on the cabling requirement on your site.
If free run cable is acceptable. The cost is low.
If conduit and pipe work is a must. Then Wireless may be a cheaper solution.

> If we have to stay wired, what switch would you recommend?

If you don't need VLAN and VLAN routing. I suggest Catalyst 6509.
If you need VLAN and VLAN routing, I suggest you not to use Cisco.
Let's try Extreme or Foundry

> Does wireless really only go up to 11MB?

For a 802.11 Wireless LAN, yes. but in a limit distant only. And it must be
an open
area. Not block by wall.
If the env is not idel. It will step down to 5MB, 2MB then 1MB.

Quncy
CCNP
HK

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What cisco router platforms are usually deployed for BGP full routes(ie, 75000) ?

[A. Geoffrey Cauchi]

Core routers are usually used for full BGP routing tables, typically 12000
and 7000 series routers.  All other routers can be used for partial and
default routes.

Regards
Geoffrey
- Original Message -
From: "Jaeheon Yoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 12:34 PM
Subject: What cisco router platforms are usually deployed for BGP full
routes(ie, 75000) ?


> Hi,
>
> while I'm reading Halabi's book, I'm getting curious.
>
> Please let me know what cisco router platforms are usually deployed
> for BGP full routes? In addition to that, what are platforms for
> partial routes and for default routes only?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What cisco router platforms are usually deployed for BGP fullroutes(ie, 75000) ?

[Brian]

On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jaeheon Yoo wrote:

> Hi,
>
> while I'm reading Halabi's book, I'm getting curious.
>
> Please let me know what cisco router platforms are usually deployed
> for BGP full routes? In addition to that, what are platforms for
> partial routes and for default routes only?

These days most companies will use a router that can do 128MB minimum.
Although 64MB can still cut it with a limited number of peers.  CPU is
also important.

3640's are very popular, and they work well.  Alot of people use the
migration to 3660 which has a very fast processor and can take their
exisiting 3640 modules.  3620 could also be used, but it has the 64MB
limitation.  CPU works however.

Larger ISP's prefer the 7206vxr, which has an excellent price point, fast
processors, and is very service provider centric.

7000's and 7500's are also used where high density is a concern.  Usually
however, high density is not a function of the borders of most
providers...they will deploy 7200's for the border and the larger
chassis like 7000/7500 can be populated with more dense blades.

The 7000 is still a very good value.  We slam them with serial ports and
use them to serve t1 customers (32 t1's per box).  An 8 port serial blade
is only $500 or so for a 7000. Compare that to a 4 port blade on a 3600
that would run $2000 easy.  7000's can have the RP/(S)SP swapped out with
a RSP7000 which essentially turns the 7000 into a 7500 with RSP1.  So long
as the 7000 can do 64MB (RSP7000 and RP64 can do 64MB) then it can do BGP
today and keep up.

2600's fell behind for a while.  The cpu couldn't cut it, but it was fine
on memory.  Now that cisco has the 265x and above out, they are contenders
in the BGP game once again.

So basically if you have 64MB and a decent cpu, it is a common router for
BGP.  You can do BGP on a 2501.don't get me wrongI am
talking about a full table however.

2650
3620/40
7206

those are probably the most popular for customers doing bgp.  7000/7500
and some other more legacy hardware may be found however.

brian


>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---
Brian Feeny, CCNP+ATM, CCDP   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cat 6509

[Olden Pieterse]

No its not a telnet session , its internal
Olden Pieterse
Pre-Sales Consultant
Westcon
Tel:   +27 21 415 7211
Fax:  +27 21 419 7537
Mobile:  +27 82 564 0709
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
Web:http://www.westcon.co.za  

Remember, our product range includes:
3Com, Addtron, APC, IMC, Cisco, Extreme, Lucent, Motorola, Nortel-Networks
and Ramp.

E-mail Disclaimer: 

Any email message from a WESTCON employee, and all attached thereto ("the
message") may contain confidential information, and is intended for a
specific addressee and purpose.  If you are not the addressee

*   you may not use, disclose, copy, distribute, retransmit, review,
disseminate or take any action based on the contents thereof;
*   kindly inform the sender immediately and destroy all copies thereof.

Any copying, publication, dissemination, retransmission or
disclosure of this message, or part thereof, in any form whatsoever, without
the sender's expressed written consent, is prohibited.  No opinion expressed
or implied by the sender necessarily constitutes the opinion of WESTCON.
This message does not constitute a guarantee or proof of the facts mentioned
therein.  WESTCON accepts no responsibility or liability in respect of:-

*   any opinion or guarantee of fact, whether expressed or implied; or
any action or failure to act as a result of any information contained in
this message, unless such information or opinion has been confirmed in
writing by an authorised WESTCON director.


-Original Message-
From:   Sam [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, December 07, 2000 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Olden Pieterse
Subject:Re: Cat 6509

try  "sw con" from the switch promt.. this will take you directly to
the
MSFC prompt.
i think a "session 15" is a telnet session.


- Original Message -
From: "Olden Pieterse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Elias Aggelidis" <>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:50 AM
Subject: RE: Cat 6509


> When you are in the switch in privilige mode (enable mode) , type
session
15
> and enter and there you go !!
> Olden Pieterse
> Pre-Sales Consultant
> Westcon
> Tel:   +27 21 415 7211
> Fax:  +27 21 419 7537
> Mobile:  +27 82 564 0709
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Web:   http://www.westcon.co.za 
>
> Remember, our product range includes:
> 3Com, Addtron, APC, IMC, Cisco, Extreme, Lucent, Motorola,
Nortel-Networks
> and Ramp.
>
> E-mail Disclaimer:
>
> Any email message from a WESTCON employee, and all attached
thereto ("the
> message") may contain confidential information, and is intended
for a
> specific addressee and purpose.  If you are not the addressee
>
> * you may not use, disclose, copy, distribute, retransmit, review,
> disseminate or take any action based on the contents thereof;
> * kindly inform the sender immediately and destroy all copies
thereof.
>
> Any copying, publication, dissemination, retransmission or
> disclosure of this message, or part thereof, in any form
whatsoever,
without
> the sender's expressed written consent, is prohibited.  No opinion
expressed
> or implied by the sender necessarily constitutes the opinion of
WESTCON.
> This message does not constitute a guarantee or proof of the facts
mentioned
> therein.  WESTCON accepts no responsibility or liability in
respect of:-
>
> * any opinion or guarantee of fact, whether expressed or implied;
or
> any action or failure to act as a result of any information
contained in
> this message, unless such information or opinion has been
confirmed in
> writing by an authorised WESTCON director.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Elias Aggelidis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:10 AM
> To: Plantier, William; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cat 6509
>
> For all of those questions the answer is on the www.cisco.com
>
> Even if you do not have an account there you can do a search for
all
> of this
> types
> of questions !
>
> Added to that RTFM
> !!
>
> Regards
>
> Elias Aggelidis
>
> CCNP + Voice
> - Original Message -
> From: "Plantier, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 

CID EXAM ALIVE AND WELL!!

[Andre' Paree-Huff]

I just called Prometric and scheduled my CID 640-025 exam for next =
Tuesday morning.  It is alive and well.  The lady I spoke to said she =
has been scheduling at least a couple people for this exam every day.  I =
stated that I heard it was pulled and she said they have gotten no word =
on it.  So as of now I am schedule to sit the CID exam next week...


Andr=E9 Paree-Huff
A+, ASE, CCDA, CCNP
MCSE+I, NET+, I-NET+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AOL AIM: pareehuff


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cat 6509

[Tom Holbrook]

Elias-

Would you not agree that the answers to almost all the questions at 
Groupstudy could be found at the Cisco site? If not then in some networking 
book. If your attitude was shared by all there would be no purpose or 
usefulness to a list like this one.

Cordially
-Tom

At 08:09 AM 12/7/2000 +0200, you wrote:
>For all of those questions the answer is on the www.cisco.com
>
>Even if you do not have an account there you can do a search for all of this
>types
>of questions !
>
>Added to that RTFM !!
>
>Regards
>
>Elias Aggelidis
>
>CCNP + Voice
>- Original Message -
>From: "Plantier, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 4:52 PM
>Subject: Cat 6509
>
>
> > I have a Cat 6509 with the MSFC card in it. How do you get to the router
> > mode of the switch?
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Wm. Spencer Plantier
> > LAN Engineer
> > (919) 474-1300 ext 0873 Office
> > (919) 474-1056 Fax
> > (919)696-8848 Cell
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: tough VPN question

[Jim Brown]

Jim,

Are the remote clients using WINS or static mappings in the HOST or LMHOST
file to identify the PDC/BDC? 

If not, the remote clients have no way of locating the PDC or BDC from a
remote network unless you forward the broadcasts.

This sounds like the issue if you have the ability to manually map drives
without the use of the browser service.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tough VPN question


Hello,

I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
from/to central office. The problem is they can't
logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
though.

Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
machines were already added to domain)

Thanks in advance.


Jim

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dream lab

[Bharat Suneja]

Is there anything like a dream lab ? Maybe it exists in dreams only! I'd
want all the routers, switches, hosts (Unix, Mac, NT/2000, Novell, SNA),
PIX, access-servers, et al I can get! There's no right answer for a dream
lab - it's going to be different things for different people.

Check out home lab scenarios on CCPrep.com - excellent resource.

Bharat Suneja

""nandit"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
90npol$9ss$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:90npol$9ss$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
> I was trying to figure out a dream lab setup for covering ccna,np,ie and
> other cisco certs.could u please add your thopughts on this.
> Thanks
> nandit
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Great Deal on CCIE LAN Switching book!!

[Bharat Suneja]

That indeed is the lowest price on the Switching book, ISBN 1578700949, CCIE
Professional Development: Cisco LAN Switching. Booksamillion.com also sells
it for $49, with a further 10% discount if you're a member of their
"Millionaire Book Club" - for $44.10 after the Club discount. Club
membership is $5/year, and it pays off with the first book you buy. I've
often found them offering the lowest prices on any Cisco Press book - I
recently bought the Cisco Press BSCN book for $42, including shipping.
Checked back a couple of days ago, and they'd raised the rates back to the
list price of $60. :-)

Bharat Suneja

"Joseph Ezerski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Working towards CCNP and was looking to expand my library.  Someone on
this
> list mentioned to check Mysimon.com and compare book prices.  I did that
and
> I found a great price at Wal-Mart of all places.
>
> Normally the book lists for 70.00 US and Walmart has it, in hard-cover,
for
> 49.00!  I ordered it today and so I cannot fully verify it, but the
website
> did say it was hardcover, so let's hope it comes through as such.
>
> Anyway, it is worth a "look-see".
>
> Joseph E
>
> -Original Message-
> From: xndr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CCIE certificationzone.com Mock Exam 754/1000
>
>
> Hi!
>
> It does not seem to be enough to pass CCIE writting.
> I'd geting about 850-880 and my pass score on real CCIE was 100 points
less.
>
> > Hit a 754/1000 tonight, I'm well pleased, but do you
> > think I'm ready or just knocking on the door ?
> >
> > Past results,
> >
> > 629
> > 636
> > 670
> > 608 (Bad Day)
> > 706
> > 706
> > 706 (Getting Cheesed off)
> > 754 (Happier)
> >
> > Any comments appreciated.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Phil.
> >
> >
> > 
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> > or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Access list & chat

[Bharat Suneja]

You can build your access lists without specifying hosts by using "any" as
source & destination addresses and specify the ports for FTP & IRC.
Web-based chats may be difficult to control, and people use buddy-list
programs to chat as well. If you want to stop those, you'll have to find out
the ports they use and block those. Don't forget the implicit "Deny All"
that's taken for granted with each access list, so after blocking those
ports you'll have to insert an allow all statement as well.

Hope this helps. Refer to IOS documentation for the exact syntax.

Bharat

""Very Gentle Guy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear all,
>
> I need to restrict my users to be able to use all chat sevrices and have
no
> browsing or ftp things, how do you think i can built my access list to do
> so?
>
> Do I have to mention host addresses or I can control it through opening
> access to specific ports only>
>
> Thanks for your help
> Ref
>

_
> Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CCIE certificationzone.com Mock Exam 754/1000

[Russell Lusignan]

CCIE written is a very tough exam, follow the blue print on Cisco's website
and you will be fine.. A good book is Roosevelt Giles CCIE all in one study
guide.. there is a lot of information covered in that book..  it's probably
overdoes it on technical detail, but it definitely helps..

Boson exams are also very good...

Russ..


"Phil Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Any Zone Fans out there ?
>
> Hit a 754/1000 tonight, I'm well pleased, but do you
> think I'm ready or just knocking on the door ?
>
> Past results,
>
> 629
> 636
> 670
> 608 (Bad Day)
> 706
> 706
> 706 (Getting Cheesed off)
> 754 (Happier)
>
> Any comments appreciated.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Phil.
>
>
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Access list & chat

[Patrick Bass]

Are you using a PIX?

""Very Gentle Guy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear all,
>
> I need to restrict my users to be able to use all chat sevrices and have
no
> browsing or ftp things, how do you think i can built my access list to do
> so?
>
> Do I have to mention host addresses or I can control it through opening
> access to specific ports only>
>
> Thanks for your help
> Ref
>

_
> Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: tough VPN question

[Scott Morris]

Your problem is likely the propgation of broadcasts...  Or lack thereof.
One thing you can do (I'm assuming you have a router before (LAN-side) the
PIX) is set up an ip-helper address to forward UDP-level broadcasts (like
138/139 Netbios) to the NT server.

The other thing you can do is bypass that broadcast thought process by using
LMHosts files on the workstations at the branch office.  That will pre-load
(if you use the #PRE designation) the NetBIOS cache and give you IP
addresses to go to.  So if you have IP reachability, things will work just
fine then.

In LMHOSTS. :

(ip address) (Netbios name) #PRE #DOM:(domain name if domain controller)

Also, to refresh without rebooting the PCs, "nbtstat -R"

Hope this helps!

Scott

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jim Bond
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tough VPN question


Hello,

I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
from/to central office. The problem is they can't
logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
though.

Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
machines were already added to domain)

Thanks in advance.


Jim

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

___
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wireless Networking

[Perry Lucas]

Not really.  The ServerIron and BigIron product lines are targeted for
DotCom and Enterprise datacenters as well as the FastIron switches.  That is
how foundry made its debut into the market and is gaining market share.  I
imagine that is one of the reasons Cisco made the acquisition of Arrowpoint
to begin competing on more equal ground with Foundry products.
I agree with you on the fact that you get more bang for you buck with
the Foundry switches and I have coordinated three deployments myself of
their products, all of which were in the DotCom market space.  I will
concede their products are working their way down the vertical into the
wiring closest and small to medium business markets BUT there are other
considersations to hardware choices and deployment beyond just how well they
perform.  One that I find most important is the amount of available support
for Cisco products than Foundry products.
In any case, to get back on topic with the orginal message that started
this thread.  The company in question is also looking at implementing VoIP
technology in the near future. (VoIP was discussed in an offline
correspondance) Based on that and the first look glimpse that we were given,
I personally believe Cisco would be a more appropriate vendor choice at this
time.


- Original Message -
From: "Andy Walden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Perry Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "LaRoy Slaughter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:30 AM
Subject: RE: Wireless Networking


>
> Thats a silly comment. They compete directly and have very similar product
> lines. As a side note, I happen to prefer Foundry due to my past
> experiences and it does deliver better bang for the buck and features at
> wire speed (ie, that don't melt the router if you turn them on). Juniper
> does also. Cisco may figure it out one day, or just continue to hemorage
> market share.
>
> andy
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Perry Lucas wrote:
>
> > I am a bit curious myself on that.  Foundry is more oriented to webfarms
and
> > load balancing while extreme is oriented to Enterprise datacenters and
MANs.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > LaRoy Slaughter
> > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:27 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Wireless Networking
> >
> >
> >
> > Please explain your choice here.
> >
> > Quncy Lau wrote:
> >
> > > If you don't need VLAN and VLAN routing. I suggest Catalyst 6509.
> > > If you need VLAN and VLAN routing, I suggest you not to use Cisco.
> > > Let's try Extreme or Foundry
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: tough VPN question

[Tracy Blackmore]

You need to make sure ports 137, 138, and I think 139 are clear both ways.
NetBIOS over IP uses these ports to authenticate to a Microsoft Domain.  As
Robert said, you will need to manually update the lmhosts file on the
clients if browser traffic is not passing the tunnel.

Tracy W. Blackmore
T.S. Lad Consulting
1026 E Stanford Ave.
Gilbert, AZ., 85234
(480)558-0472

 -Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: tough VPN question

Hi,

  Does the network configured to work with the 10.x.x.x addresses as a C
class ?
If you do it sometimes cause a lot of problems with NBT so just for argument
sake try configuring two computers with a true C class or a True B class and
than try.

 I hope it helps 
   Gil

-Original Message-
From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ??? ? 07 ? 2000 08:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tough VPN question


Hello,

I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
from/to central office. The problem is they can't
logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
though.

Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
machines were already added to domain)

Thanks in advance.


Jim

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What cisco router platforms are usually deployed for BGP full routes(ie, 75000) ?

[suaveguru]

actually many routers can do full routes , partial
routes and default routes , for example 25xx, 26xx,
36xx etc 

whether they can accept full routes or not depend on
your DRAM , usually 64mb will be sufficient but I will
personally prefer 128mb DRAM for optimal performance


hope that helps

suaveguru
--- Jaeheon Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> while I'm reading Halabi's book, I'm getting
> curious.
> 
> Please let me know what cisco router platforms are
> usually deployed
> for BGP full routes? In addition to that, what are
> platforms for
> partial routes and for default routes only?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Great Deal on CCIE LAN Switching book!!

[Joseph Ezerski]

I noticed that Wal-Mart.com has a significant number of Cisco Press books in
the $40+ range.  I received my order confirmation and I am awaiting
delivery.  I had it sent via regualr ground mail, so it may take a week or
so.  If everything checks out, I may order more.  Currently, I am preparing
to take the CIT exam to complete my CCNP.  However, the CCIE is my next
lofty goal, so my library has found itself expanding at a very fast pace.

Joseph

-Original Message-
From: Bharat Suneja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Great Deal on CCIE LAN Switching book!!


That indeed is the lowest price on the Switching book, ISBN 1578700949, CCIE
Professional Development: Cisco LAN Switching. Booksamillion.com also sells
it for $49, with a further 10% discount if you're a member of their
"Millionaire Book Club" - for $44.10 after the Club discount. Club
membership is $5/year, and it pays off with the first book you buy. I've
often found them offering the lowest prices on any Cisco Press book - I
recently bought the Cisco Press BSCN book for $42, including shipping.
Checked back a couple of days ago, and they'd raised the rates back to the
list price of $60. :-)

Bharat Suneja

"Joseph Ezerski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Working towards CCNP and was looking to expand my library.  Someone on
this
> list mentioned to check Mysimon.com and compare book prices.  I did that
and
> I found a great price at Wal-Mart of all places.
>
> Normally the book lists for 70.00 US and Walmart has it, in hard-cover,
for
> 49.00!  I ordered it today and so I cannot fully verify it, but the
website
> did say it was hardcover, so let's hope it comes through as such.
>
> Anyway, it is worth a "look-see".
>
> Joseph E
>
> -Original Message-
> From: xndr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CCIE certificationzone.com Mock Exam 754/1000
>
>
> Hi!
>
> It does not seem to be enough to pass CCIE writting.
> I'd geting about 850-880 and my pass score on real CCIE was 100 points
less.
>
> > Hit a 754/1000 tonight, I'm well pleased, but do you
> > think I'm ready or just knocking on the door ?
> >
> > Past results,
> >
> > 629
> > 636
> > 670
> > 608 (Bad Day)
> > 706
> > 706
> > 706 (Getting Cheesed off)
> > 754 (Happier)
> >
> > Any comments appreciated.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Phil.
> >
> >
> > 
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> > or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tough VPN question

[Minh Vu]

Here is the link that have sample configuration (in IPSec section) for IPSec
Router-to-PIX, IPSec Router-to-Router, IPSec Router-to-Router with NAT,
etcI hope this help,

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/


- Original Message -
From: "Francis Gibbons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: tough VPN question


> You are not NAT'ing the clients to the Domain Controller are you? I think
> you are by the fact that the branch office shares 1 IP address.
> Domain Logon can NOT be NAT'd while SMB/CIFS can be (ie map drives)
>
> Francis Gibbons
> Network Architect, CCSI, CCNP, CNE, MCSE
> Global Knowledge Network (Canada)
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:18 AM
> Subject: tough VPN question
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> > office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> > office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> > fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> > from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> > logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> > though.
> >
> > Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> > machines were already added to domain)
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> > http://shopping.yahoo.com/
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> > unsubscribe ccielab
> >
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Publishing Date?

[Adam Hickey]

Anyone know when Doyle is going to publish Vol 2?

Adam Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hub-to-Switch connection problem

[Benjamin Walling]

I've never had the little button/switch work on a 3Com.  I've always had to
use a crossover.

"Herold Heiko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Happened to me before, connecting old 10mbit noname hubs to 3com
> officeconnect ones. the switch on the 3coms did not work with those,
> only a crosscable did work. Never discovered why, although obviously
> those old hubs were blamed :)
>
> Heiko



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Access list & chat

[Akin Wuraola]

I think you need an extended access list for this. try this and it should
block browsing and ftp'ing and allow all other traffic out of your specified
interface;

Router#conf t
Router(config)#access-list 110 deny tcp  to
 eq 
Router(config)#access-list 110 deny tcp  to
 eq 
Router(config)#access-list 110 permit ip any any
Router(config)#int e0
Router(config-if)#access-group 110 out

Akin

-Original Message-
From: Very Gentle Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Access list & chat


Dear all,

I need to restrict my users to be able to use all chat sevrices and have no 
browsing or ftp things, how do you think i can built my access list to do 
so?

Do I have to mention host addresses or I can control it through opening 
access to specific ports only>

Thanks for your help
Ref

_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered 
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/


*
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate that
information.  Although this email and any attachments
are believed to be free of any virus, or any other defect
which might affect any computer or IT system into which
they are received and opened, it is the responsibility of
the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and no
responsibility is accepted by Rowe & Maw for any loss
or damage arising in any way from receipt or use thereof.

Rowe & Maw
20 Black Friars Lane
London
EC4V 6HD

Rowe & Maw is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the
names of partners is open to inspection at the above office.
**

_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered 
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

640-445 SNAM

[Stevan Pierce]

As prep for the CCIE, I am scheduled to take the Global Knowledge class of
SNA Config for Multiprotocol Admins on Dec 18th-22nd,
http://db.globalknowledge.com/catalog/course.asp?course=5600&cat=6  I was
wondering what opinion people might have regarding not only the class, but
the provider as well.

Also, has anyone taken the test for Cisco for the SNA #640-445 and if so
what can you tell me, without violating the NDA.

tia

Stevan Pierce




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=1&i=1075&t=1075
--
You are reading GroupStudy's Associate Mailing List.  To unsubscribe follow
the directions on http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hub-to-Switch connection problem

[Herold Heiko]

Happened to me before, connecting old 10mbit noname hubs to 3com
officeconnect ones. the switch on the 3coms did not work with those,
only a crosscable did work. Never discovered why, although obviously
those old hubs were blamed :)

Heiko

-- 
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Marocchesa, 14 ph  x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087
-- ITALY



>-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 5:51 PM
>To: 'Bradley J. Wilson'; cisco
>Subject: Re: Hub-to-Switch connection problem
>
>
>I'm wondering why the MDI/MDI-X switch did not help.
>
>At any time using this switch did you see a link light on the eqpt? no
>link - flip the switch, also no light? - check the cable. 
>(however a x-over
>cable and engaged MDI-X would be straight through  :-
>
>I have used all manner of eqpt and the MDI/MDI-X worked as 
>expected, just
>like uplink ports, etc.
>
>Kevin Wigle
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mayo Joseph W CONT NSSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Bradley J. Wilson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "cisco"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 9:16 AM
>Subject: RE: Hub-to-Switch connection problem
>
>
>> The hub and switch are both at the same OSI layer 2. The 
>rule is still
>> correct.
>>
>> JM
>>
>> Joseph Mayo
>> Network Engineer
>> Phone: (757) 393-9526  Fax: (757) 393-9847
>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bradley J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 7:31 AM
>> To: cisco
>> Subject: Hub-to-Switch connection problem
>>
>>
>> Okay gang, I had an interesting and annoying situation 
>yesterday morning,
>> and I'd like to see if anyone else has had an experience like this:
>>
>> My client was installing an older BayStack 301 switch into 
>their existing
>> network, which consisted of a Bay Access Node router, as well as four
>> stacked SynOptics LattisHubs.  The router was experiencing excessive
>> collisions, hence the installation of the switch.  So we 
>installed the
>> switch and cabled the router to it, moved all the "power 
>users" directly
>> onto the switch, and left the other users attached to the hub.  We
>attached
>> the hub to the switch via a straight-through cable.
>>
>> The users who were directly connected to the switch had no problem
>accessing
>> the network and Internet.  The users on the hub were dead in 
>the water.
>We
>> tried swapping out the cable between the hub and switch, 
>tried plugging
>> either end into different ports, tried flipping the 
>MDI/MDI-X switch, and
>> nothing worked.  The only thing that *did* work was using a 
>*crossover*
>> cable between the hub and the switch.
>>
>> Now, the rule (which I gleaned from this newsgroup, btw) is that when
>you're
>> connecting devices at different OSI layers, you use a 
>straight-through -
>> e.g. PC to hub, PC to switch, switch to router, hub to 
>switch - that's all
>> straight-through.  You use a crossover when you're 
>connecting devices at
>the
>> same OSI layer - router to router, switch to switch, hub to 
>hub, PC to PC.
>> In the situation yesterday, a straight-through seemed 
>logical, as we were
>> trying to connect a hub to a switch.  Am I wrong here?  Why did the
>> crossover work?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> BJ
>>
>> P.S. sorry for the Bay-centric example...I'm trying to get 
>them to change
>> that. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> _
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct 
>and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ISDN Switch Type basic-net3 - Question- Chuck or Priscilla any input?

[Raul F. Fernandez]

Dear folks,

I would like to do some research on the strange behavior of the switch =
type basic-net3.

Usually when a show ISDN status command is done and an ISDN BRI is =
correctly configured

it will show the physical layer as "ACTIVE" unless backup interface =
commands are in use.

When backup commands are in use the output of the show isdn status show =
the physical

layer as "DEACTIVATED". This switch type is used in Europe has the =
behavior of showing the=20

physical layer as "DEACTIVATED" and no backup commands are being used. =
This causes some

confusion where I work at. Anyway, I would like to research this further =
but seems like the CCO

is only interested in how to enter this switch type in a router =
configuration and other sources which

I have looked are very sketchy on information on the switch capabilites. =
Any information

would be appreciated.

Sincerely,

Raul




_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Need Help W/PIX 515

[Nabil Fares]

Greetings,

Anyone out there willing to help me set this baby up, its driving me crazy.
Please let me know and I'll email you directly.

Thanks,

Nabil

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cisco vs. HP Switches

[Denis A. Baldwin]

We are looking at four new 24 port switches for our network.  We have Cisco
and HP as our final contenders.  Both the HP Procurve and the  Cisco
Catalyst carry similar specs, but the HP is about 20% of the cost of the
Cisco.  Can someone give me a REAL reason why the Cisco Catalyst would be a
better choice. Our network is all 10/100 for now and we won't need Gigabit
for at least a couple of years.  We need these switches to be in 24 port
configurations as the company is going to split in two in a couple of months
and move half of the operations to another building, so we need to be able
to split the network as needed.  I know this is a Cisco group, which is why
I am asking it here, because I want a BIASED opinion of why Cisco would be
better in this situation.  Thank you all for your suggestions.

Denis


Denis A. Baldwin
Network Administrator - CAE, Inc.
A+, MCP, i-Net+, Network+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
810-231-9373, ext. 229


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BGP lab set up.

[Farooq Ali]

Hi all, I have searched around and couldn't find any place 
which could
help me set up a BGP lab. I have 5 routers 4 2500 and one 3600. Please let
me know if there is any place with the details of how to setup one. I will
also appreciate if anyone has a set up like this and would like to share the
configs and connections with me, thanks in advance.

Farooq Ali CCNA CCNP.




_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Upgraded Flash in my 2501 - Weird???

[Ole Drews Jensen]

I just got my 8MB Flash SIMM which I within seconds placed in my first 2501
and did a COPY TFTP FLASH.

After it erased the Flash (which was already empty) it got half way
whereafter it timed out and the checksum was bad (of course).

I tried three times in a row just to make sure it was not just a glitch, and
I restarted my TFTP server (the free one from Cisco running on an NT 4.0),
but the same thing happened everytime.

I knew that the IOS image (igs-in-l.110-22.bin) which I had received from
TAC was good, because I had replaced my older image (in10350n) with it a
couple of weeks ago on my 4MB Flash SIMM.

However, to start troubleshooting, I changed back to my 4MB Flash SIMM
again, and did a COPY TFTP FLASH to see if the IOS image now was defect, but
that went through very well.

Okay, I then changed back again to my 8MB Flash SIMM, did a COPY TFTP FLASH
and asked it to get the older IOS image, and this time it went through the
entire process without any problems. I then tried the newer IOS image, and
this time it worked.

Are there some newer IOS images you cannot load to flash if you are booted
up on Boot ROM's (mine are IGS-RXBOOT version 10.2(5))???

It works fine now, I just thought it was a little weird.

Any comments are appreciated.

Thanks,

Ole


 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp

 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Publishing Date?

[Coker, Michael]

The last time I spoke to him he said he was doing the final edits on the
book.

Amazon lists it as March 2001 and they are generally correct, as the
Editor's of the book are sure to keep Amazon and such updated with release
dates.

--Mike

> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Hickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Publishing Date?
> 
> 
> Anyone know when Doyle is going to publish Vol 2?
> 
> Adam Hickey
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: how does traffic from CAT55 switch moule to Route switch modu le (RSM)?

[Yurchenko, Michael]

RSM uses virtual connections to the switch fabric. If you put a vlan port on
the rsm and then assign this same vlan to one of the switchports, then you
should be able to connect to the rsm via that port. vlan interfaces are
virtual interfaces between the switch and the rsm. 


-Original Message-
From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:01 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: how does traffic from CAT55 switch moule to Route switch
modu le (RSM)?


Sorry , I send again, as I want to add one more question


Dear all,

1)I have a cat 55 switch which got 2 X 10/100BaseTX Ethernet module and 1 X
Route Switch Module (RSM), so, I have 48 ports on the switches module and
divided into 3 VLANs some of ports were set to VLAN 1, 2 3, and the RSM
module is connect thru our WAN router to world, and RSM, the layer 3 device
is used to route the traffic between VLANs but I don't know how does the
traffic from the switches module do to RSM module as there is no cable
connection or it do internally?

2)I found my RSM module is configured 3 VLANs inteface, 100.100.100.99,
100.100.200.99, 100.100.300.99, but I can't see there are phyiscal
interface. Why?

Below shown the conf, sometarou is the switch module and SOMETAROU is the
RSM module 

3)From the sh cdp nei configuration in the switch module below, I wonder why
only VLAN1 connect to RSM module, I thought we configured VLANs 1 2 3 in
switches module


sometarou> sh cdp nei
* - indicates vlan mismatch.
# - indicates duplex mismatch.
Port Device-ID   Port-ID   Platform
 --- -

 2/1 SOMETAROU   Vlan1 cisco
RSP2
 3/1 066506067(somenosuke)   3/1   WS-C5505
 3/2 066506067(somenosuke)   3/2   WS-C5505
 3/3 066506067(somenosuke)   3/3   WS-C5505
 3/4 066506067(somenosuke)   3/4   WS-C5505
sometarou> session 2
Trying Router-2...
Connected to Router-2.
Escape character is '^]'.


* Catalyst 5505 #2 *
* RSM WS-X5302 *
*SOMETAROU *



User Access Verification

Password:
SOMETAROU>sh cdp nei
Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
  S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater

Device IDLocal Intrfce HoldtmeCapability  Platform  Port ID
066507401(sometarou)Vlan1  132 T B S  WS-C5505  2/1
SOMETAROU>

==
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
==
The information contained in this message may be confidential 
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


==

___
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Help me guys CCO Login

[dwhitley]

 

Go to the following link and you can sign up as a Cisco consultant, there
are no prerequisites.  You will receive a CCO login for you troubles.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/792/determine.html
  




-Original Message- 
From: Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor 
[ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 4:27 PM 
To: Shahid Muhammad Shafi; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: Help me guys CCO Login 


You have to pay. 

-Original Message- 
From: Shahid Muhammad Shafi [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:58 AM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Help me guys CCO Login 


Hi Cisco gurus out there. I want some help, i need to 
make CCO login and i know thayt i can do that by 
clicking register but then it askds for a verification 
key for which i have no clue. kindly u guys help me 
with this. 

= 
Shahid Muhammad Shafi 
MSc Telecommunications Candidate 
University of Colorado Boulder 
BSEE(GIKI),MCSE+I,CNA,CCNA,CCNP,NNCAS 

Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/
  
A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than ourselves


__ 
Do You Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. 
http://shopping.yahoo.com/   

_ 
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_ 
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cisco vs. HP Switches

[Ben Hockenhull]

> We are looking at four new 24 port switches for our network.  We have Cisco
> and HP as our final contenders.  Both the HP Procurve and the  Cisco
> Catalyst carry similar specs, but the HP is about 20% of the cost of the
> Cisco.  Can someone give me a REAL reason why the Cisco Catalyst would be a
> better choice. Our network is all 10/100 for now and we won't need Gigabit
> for at least a couple of years.  We need these switches to be in 24 port
> configurations as the company is going to split in two in a couple of months
> and move half of the operations to another building, so we need to be able
> to split the network as needed.  I know this is a Cisco group, which is why
> I am asking it here, because I want a BIASED opinion of why Cisco would be
> better in this situation.  Thank you all for your suggestions.

I run a network that has a mix of Catalyst and ProCurve switches in it.  I
use the ProCurve stuff quite a bit for desktop/local wiring closet
connections.

Frankly, it's really nice hardware, and I love it.  Config is accomplished
through a menu-based interface, which is kind of a pain in the butt when
you're trying to do a lot of config in a short time, but you can also tftp
config files into the switches.  I greatly prefer the command line.

The ProCurve hardware supports virtual stacking/clustering, CoS, etc.
The ProCurve hardware also carries a lifetime warranty.  You let the magic
smoke out of a switch, and they'll send you a new one.  

The Catalyst stuff has a lot more flexibility with respect to config,
which shouldn't surprise you much.  Some of the Catalyst stuff also has an
upgrade path to allow you to do inline power to the ports for IP phones,
if that's something you want to look at later on.

Ben

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Incredible Lab !!!!!

[Quinton Maynard]

Hey Guys,
I am throwing in the towel... Or more accurately, going the management 
route, which leaves me no longer needing my CCIE LAB. This one is as 
complete as it gets. It has absolutely everything (other than VOIP) and i 
couldn't do a cost justification for that given it's only two points on the 
lab. Here is what i have.. it is listed on EBAY..

"http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1200942925"

Cisco 7000 with RP, SSP, 2 6port EIP and ATM OC-3 MM.

Cisco Lightstream 100 with 3 OC-3 and 2 DS-3 cards

Cisco Catalyst 5000 with Sup 3 and Netflow, 12 port 10/100 and ATM LANE

Cisco 4500, with 2pt Serial, 2pt Ethernet, 2pt Token Ring, and DS-3 ATM

2520, 2509,2513,2513,2503,2502 (async included w/ 2509)

AGS+ with tons of ports

100b fx-tx transciever

nt1's

2 Maus

All Cables including cisco dce/dte

atm nics (3)

token ring nics (5)

12 port power bar/surge protector on rack

86" rack

multiple CCIE Books from Cisco Press

Courseware from Global Knowledge (ACRC & Frame)

Other courseware...

This is everything... if you can't pass your lab with this setup, you just 
can't pass  Check it out at

"http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1200942925"


_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help me guys CCO Login

[Mark]

Yes, with the Cisco consultant login you can get almost all documentation,
but you can not download images etc.


<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> Go to the following link and you can sign up as a Cisco consultant, there
> are no prerequisites.  You will receive a CCO login for you troubles.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/792/determine.html
> 
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor
> [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 4:27 PM
> To: Shahid Muhammad Shafi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Help me guys CCO Login
>
>
> You have to pay.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shahid Muhammad Shafi [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  ]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Help me guys CCO Login
>
>
> Hi Cisco gurus out there. I want some help, i need to
> make CCO login and i know thayt i can do that by
> clicking register but then it askds for a verification
> key for which i have no clue. kindly u guys help me
> with this.
>
> =
> Shahid Muhammad Shafi
> MSc Telecommunications Candidate
> University of Colorado Boulder
> BSEE(GIKI),MCSE+I,CNA,CCNA,CCNP,NNCAS
>
> Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/
> 
> A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than
ourselves
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/ 
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> 
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> 
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cisco vs. HP Switches

[Ron Stark]

How about "Complete network management" with Cisco Works.




"Denis A. Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/07/2000 10:30:35 AM

Please respond to "Denis A. Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Ron Stark/SanDiego/Cymer)
Subject:  Cisco vs. HP Switches



We are looking at four new 24 port switches for our network.  We have Cisco
and HP as our final contenders.  Both the HP Procurve and the  Cisco
Catalyst carry similar specs, but the HP is about 20% of the cost of the
Cisco.  Can someone give me a REAL reason why the Cisco Catalyst would be a
better choice. Our network is all 10/100 for now and we won't need Gigabit
for at least a couple of years.  We need these switches to be in 24 port
configurations as the company is going to split in two in a couple of months
and move half of the operations to another building, so we need to be able
to split the network as needed.  I know this is a Cisco group, which is why
I am asking it here, because I want a BIASED opinion of why Cisco would be
better in this situation.  Thank you all for your suggestions.

Denis


Denis A. Baldwin
Network Administrator - CAE, Inc.
A+, MCP, i-Net+, Network+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
810-231-9373, ext. 229


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]






_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hub-to-Switch connectivity issue

[Bradley J. Wilson]

Okay...I've been digesting the responses I've received about this issue, and
what I've come up with can be reduced to two comments:

1) The fact that flipping the MDI/MDI-X switch didn't initially work leads
me to believe that I wasn't using it right.  The fact remains that
connecting a hub to a switch must be accomplished using a crossover cable.

2) Why is that?  It's true that connecting devices at different layers of
the OSI model requires a straight-through cable, and that connecting devices
at the same layer requires a crossover cable.  So isn't it true that
switches are layer 2, and hubs are layer 1?  No.  Hubs are actually layer 2
devices, and here's why: while a hub may not understand or care about source
and destination MAC addresses, checksums, or what's in the "type" field, it
*does* know the rules of CSMACD communication, and has to play by the same
rules as other layer 2 devices.  Therefore, hubs can be considered Layer 2
devices, and thus must be connected to switches with a crossover cable.

Anyone see anything wrong with my synopsis above?  Let me know.  Just be
careful with your caps lock key. ;-)

Thanks,

BJ




_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Publishing Date?

[Newton, James A. (AIT)]

Does anyone know who it will differ from volume one?

-Original Message-
From: Adam Hickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Publishing Date?


Anyone know when Doyle is going to publish Vol 2?

Adam Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RE: tough VPN question]

[Manishkumar Patel]

I beleive your problem is WINS lookup.
Create a LMHOST file without any extension.
Write following line in your file

  #PRE #DOM
Do not Include < > signs, Just replace the words.
DONT forget NO EXTENSION to file.
Save file in WINNT\SYSTEM32\Drivers\ETC directory.
You have to copy this file on every PC. the same folder.
Good luck
MK
CCNA, MCSE, CNE


"Scott Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your problem is likely the propgation of broadcasts...  Or lack thereof.
> One thing you can do (I'm assuming you have a router before (LAN-side) the
> PIX) is set up an ip-helper address to forward UDP-level broadcasts (like
> 138/139 Netbios) to the NT server.
> 
> The other thing you can do is bypass that broadcast thought process by
using
> LMHosts files on the workstations at the branch office.  That will pre-load
> (if you use the #PRE designation) the NetBIOS cache and give you IP
> addresses to go to.  So if you have IP reachability, things will work just
> fine then.
> 
> In LMHOSTS. :
> 
> (ip address) (Netbios name) #PRE #DOM:(domain name if domain controller)
> 
> Also, to refresh without rebooting the PCs, "nbtstat -R"
> 
> Hope this helps!
> 
> Scott
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jim Bond
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: tough VPN question
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> though.
> 
> Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> machines were already added to domain)
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> Jim
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
> 
> ___
> To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> unsubscribe ccielab
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ISDN Switch Type basic-net3 - Question- Chuck or Priscilla any input?

[David Wolsefer]

This is typical behavior for the basic-net3 switch. You won't see active
until the call is placed, then everything will be normal.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Raul F. Fernandez
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ISDN Switch Type basic-net3 - Question- Chuck or Priscilla any
input?


Dear folks,

I would like to do some research on the strange behavior of the switch =
type basic-net3.

Usually when a show ISDN status command is done and an ISDN BRI is =
correctly configured

it will show the physical layer as "ACTIVE" unless backup interface =
commands are in use.

When backup commands are in use the output of the show isdn status show =
the physical

layer as "DEACTIVATED". This switch type is used in Europe has the =
behavior of showing the=20

physical layer as "DEACTIVATED" and no backup commands are being used. =
This causes some

confusion where I work at. Anyway, I would like to research this further =
but seems like the CCO

is only interested in how to enter this switch type in a router =
configuration and other sources which

I have looked are very sketchy on information on the switch capabilites. =
Any information

would be appreciated.

Sincerely,

Raul




_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Obligatory "I passed BSCN!" post

[Robert Yee]

Hi All!

I took the Routing 2.0 exam this morning and suprisingly walked away with
908/1000. After completing the exam, I was fairly certain that I would be
back for another shot at it in a week or two, but I guess the network gods
were with me today.

The following is what I used to study from:

1. Courseware from BSCN: Very good. You have top read and understand ALL the
routing concepts. I skimmed through the Cisco Press BSCN book and I believe
that it is comparable o the courseware.

2. Boson test #1: Good. The Boson test is actually much easier that the real
thing. I had about 6 questions on the real test that I saw on Boson. Boson
will test your knowledge of the subject and I thnk it is a worthwhile
investment. 

3. Routing TCP/IP from Jeff Doyle: Very Good. I didn't read through the
whole book. I used this book to clarify points that I did not understand on
the interior protocols.

4. www.cisco.com: Excellent. But you have to did a little for the info.

5. Study notes from www.routedpacket.com. Great! These are great to read the
night before the exam or right before you take it.

Overall, I though the exam was about the hardest one that I've ever taken. I
used educated guesses on a lot of the questions. The answers are all there
in front of you, I just applied the concepts that I knew and used the
process of elimination. It was ALL multiple choice.

WATCH OUT FOR ERRORS! I had a question that had a blatant error on it. Not
that there is anything you can do about it, I chose the 'best' answer that I
could.

Follow the test outline that Cisco has on their website, the test follows it
pretty closely.

KNOW the concepts behind the routng protocols!!! I can't emphasize this
enough. I had more questions that were analytical than memorization kind.

Hope this helps.

Robert

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dream lab

[Matthew . Sypherd]

Hey everyone,

 Don't forget the satellite uplinks to test that pesky delay!

On a serious note, do many of you have non-Cisco layer 2 or above devices
in your labs, other than servers/hosts?  I realize this wouldn't help too
much with specific Cisco certification, but I imagine would be potentially
invaluable for real-world multi-vendor situations.

I got my hands on a cheap 3Com LanModem to play with RIP interoperability
(doesn't do much else, SFAIK) and I can use it for testing dial-backup.
Other than that, I play with Checkpoint FW-1 (primarily NT with a little
Solaris added in) but have yet to test with my 2600 CSIS.  In due time

Matthew Sypherd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP+Security CCDP CCSE MCSE CCIE-R/S-Written
Still waiting to hear back on the CCIE-Security-Written beta.





"Bharat Suneja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com
12/07/2000 09:14 AM





Please respond to "Bharat Suneja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:  Re: dream lab


Is there anything like a dream lab ? Maybe it exists in dreams only! I'd
want all the routers, switches, hosts (Unix, Mac, NT/2000, Novell, SNA),
PIX, access-servers, et al I can get! There's no right answer for a dream
lab - it's going to be different things for different people.

Check out home lab scenarios on CCPrep.com - excellent resource.

Bharat Suneja

""nandit"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
90npol$9ss$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:90npol$9ss$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
> I was trying to figure out a dream lab setup for covering ccna,np,ie and
> other cisco certs.could u please add your thopughts on this.
> Thanks
> nandit
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Passed BCRAN this morning

[RAUL RENTERIA]

Congrats William I 'm taking the test next week, & it would be great 
if you can post the tools you used to prepare for this test.  Thank you 
ahead of time

Raul.

>From: "william" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "william" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Passed BCRAN this morning
>Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:36:23 +0800
>
>Dear all
>
>
>Thanks for you guy's infomation.
>
>Keep it up.
>
>Whoever want my study notes, pls feel free to contact me.
>
>
>
>William
>
>
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hub-to-Switch connectivity issue

[Austin]

DTE to DTE uses cross-over cables.
Is this correct?


""Bradley J. Wilson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
031901c0608a$b9d87d20$ca01010a@bwilson">news:031901c0608a$b9d87d20$ca01010a@bwilson...
> Okay...I've been digesting the responses I've received about this issue,
and
> what I've come up with can be reduced to two comments:
>
> 1) The fact that flipping the MDI/MDI-X switch didn't initially work leads
> me to believe that I wasn't using it right.  The fact remains that
> connecting a hub to a switch must be accomplished using a crossover cable.
>
> 2) Why is that?  It's true that connecting devices at different layers of
> the OSI model requires a straight-through cable, and that connecting
devices
> at the same layer requires a crossover cable.  So isn't it true that
> switches are layer 2, and hubs are layer 1?  No.  Hubs are actually layer
2
> devices, and here's why: while a hub may not understand or care about
source
> and destination MAC addresses, checksums, or what's in the "type" field,
it
> *does* know the rules of CSMACD communication, and has to play by the same
> rules as other layer 2 devices.  Therefore, hubs can be considered Layer 2
> devices, and thus must be connected to switches with a crossover cable.
>
> Anyone see anything wrong with my synopsis above?  Let me know.  Just be
> careful with your caps lock key. ;-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> BJ
>
>
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: tough VPN question

[Jean-Marc Gilbert]

Hello,

in addition, consider that IPSEC does NOT deal whith Bcast/Mcast. If your
choice is to propagate them, you must specifie in the (extended) ACL controling
encrypted trafic something like "deny any 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0" and so on for
Mcast...
this fools me some month ago.

Hope this help,
 jean-marc

On 07-Dec-00 Jim Brown wrote:
> Jim,
> 
> Are the remote clients using WINS or static mappings in the HOST or LMHOST
> file to identify the PDC/BDC? 
> 
> If not, the remote clients have no way of locating the PDC or BDC from a
> remote network unless you forward the broadcasts.
> 
> This sounds like the issue if you have the ability to manually map drives
> without the use of the browser service.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: tough VPN question
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> though.
> 
> Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> machines were already added to domain)
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> Jim
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
E-Mail: Jean-Marc Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07-Dec-00
Time: 22:05:00
--

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hub-to-Switch connection problem

[Tony van Ree]

If they are the old LattisNet hubs they may have been out before the actuall UTP 
standards in 1990 or so.   These had some funny quirks.

Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia

On Thursday, December 07, 2000 at 12:00:22 PM, Benjamin Walling wrote:

> I've never had the little button/switch work on a 3Com.  I've always had to
> use a crossover.
> 
> "Herold Heiko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Happened to me before, connecting old 10mbit noname hubs to 3com
> > officeconnect ones. the switch on the 3coms did not work with those,
> > only a crosscable did work. Never discovered why, although obviously
> > those old hubs were blamed :)
> >
> > Heiko
> 
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


--
www.tasmail.com


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CCDA Training Kit For Sale

[John Huston]

UPDATE

This have been sold.


""John Huston"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
90mbbv$222$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:90mbbv$222$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> http://www.ciscopress.com/book.cfm?series=2&book=156
>
> I purchased the above and passed the CCDA test two weeks later.
Everything
> in on the CD.
>
> Inquiries: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Price:  $55 plus shipping
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

stacks decoder

[Brian Lodwick]

Hey group does anyone know where I can get software to interpret the output 
of a show stacks command?

>>>Brian
_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Intermittent ping problems with only one of 80 devices

[David Toalson]

I am using WhatsUp Gold to monitor about 80 devices on my network.  It
is set to send a ping every 1 minute and monitor the response then
notify by - email, page, popup, log file when there is a missed ping.  I
have most of my devices set to log all missed pings, but only notify
after 4 missed pings.  We have one problem device that misses about 70
pings per day (there were 3 loss pings while writing this) and has been
doing this for about 4 weeks.  I am monitoring 2 other devices on the
same subnet and 4 devices between WhatsUp and this device (I am also
pinging another 8 devices on the same side of the fiber link) with no
problems.  Unfortunately the devices on the other side of the fiber are
controlled by my parent company and I have no direct access.  My side is
all NT40 with Cisco (except one 3Com hub) running EIGRP with a fiber
link to the parent.  The parent uses Bay with Novel (see below).  I am
pinging devices 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12.  12 is the only one
that is showing the lost pings (we are seeing down time for any of the
users).  The network admin for the parent says it is caused by
collisions on the ping itself.  WhatsUp is set to wait 5 seconds for a
response to any pings.  I have been out to cisco.com and can not find
much on ping other than how to, so I have two questions.  1.  Does a
router rebroadcast a ping if there is a collision?  2.  Anything else
you can think of that would cause this to happen on only the one device
out of the 80?

Devices/layout:
1) NT Workstation ---> 
2) Cisco 1900 10mg switch ---> 
3) Cisco 2900 100mg switch > 
4) Cisco 2524 router --- T1 frame relay ---> 
5) Cisco 7505 in ---> 
6) 3Com Hub with Fiber transceiver - traffic in one port and out another
only ---> 
6A) 1/4 mile fiber 10mg ---> 
7) Bay switch ---> 
8) Bay Router in ---> 
9) Bay switch --- frame relay --->
10) Bay switch ---> internal fiber ---> 
11) Bay switch --- > 
12) Novel Server
13) 30 NT workstations with no down time reported (mostly telnet
sessions)

Thank you for reading this long message, all help will be appreciated.

David Toalson
816-701-4142

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MCNS Power Points

[mjans001]

http://www.cisco-users.org/downloads.htm

>  -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Verzonden:donderdag 7 december 2000 0:01
> Aan:  Cisco
> Onderwerp:MCNS Power Points
> 
>   Group,
>Does anybody know where I can get the MCNS 2.0 or PIX Power Point
> Presentations?
> 
>Thanks!
> 
> Christopher J. Dosch
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BGP lab set up.

[Brian]

Farooq,

You can just put your own together.  Read the BGP guides on CCO, or a
chapter on BGP like in the BCSN book, or read the halabi book.  Start
simple, with basic neighbor statments, maybe use examples in the books,
and then go from there...

Brian


On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Farooq Ali wrote:

>   Hi all, I have searched around and couldn't find any place 
>which could
> help me set up a BGP lab. I have 5 routers 4 2500 and one 3600. Please let
> me know if there is any place with the details of how to setup one. I will
> also appreciate if anyone has a set up like this and would like to share the
> configs and connections with me, thanks in advance.
>
> Farooq Ali CCNA CCNP.
>
>
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---
Brian Feeny, CCNP+ATM, CCDP   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RE: tough VPN question]

[Sam Munzani]

Does anybody know if a Altiga Client software will work with PIX? If it
does, Altiga client has options for WINS settings.

Sam

> I beleive your problem is WINS lookup.
> Create a LMHOST file without any extension.
> Write following line in your file
>
>   #PRE #DOM
> Do not Include < > signs, Just replace the words.
> DONT forget NO EXTENSION to file.
> Save file in WINNT\SYSTEM32\Drivers\ETC directory.
> You have to copy this file on every PC. the same folder.
> Good luck
> MK
> CCNA, MCSE, CNE
>
>
> "Scott Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your problem is likely the propgation of broadcasts...  Or lack thereof.
> > One thing you can do (I'm assuming you have a router before (LAN-side)
the
> > PIX) is set up an ip-helper address to forward UDP-level broadcasts
(like
> > 138/139 Netbios) to the NT server.
> >
> > The other thing you can do is bypass that broadcast thought process by
> using
> > LMHosts files on the workstations at the branch office.  That will
pre-load
> > (if you use the #PRE designation) the NetBIOS cache and give you IP
> > addresses to go to.  So if you have IP reachability, things will work
just
> > fine then.
> >
> > In LMHOSTS. :
> >
> > (ip address) (Netbios name) #PRE #DOM:(domain name if domain controller)
> >
> > Also, to refresh without rebooting the PCs, "nbtstat -R"
> >
> > Hope this helps!
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Jim Bond
> > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:19 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: tough VPN question
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> > office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> > office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> > fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> > from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> > logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> > though.
> >
> > Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> > machines were already added to domain)
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> > http://shopping.yahoo.com/
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> > unsubscribe ccielab
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> unsubscribe ccielab

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Intermittent ping problems with only one of 80 devices

[Jonathan V Hays]

1. First, the ping to this device is NOT a broadcast but a unicast packet. Second, the
Ethernet CSMA/CD algorithm will take care of retransmission due to collisions. IP/ICMP
layer is does not retransmit, but (as you know) a standard "ping" does wait for an
answer and tells you if it doesn't get a reply.  So yes, the router's ethernet 
interface
will retransmit a frame if it sees a collision, just like any other ethernet device.

2. If the problem is ethernet, it could be a flaky ethernet card or cable, but there 
are
a lot of possibilities, including software doing too many broadcasts, bad port on a
hub/switch, etc. If possible, swap the cable from the evil machine (where it plugs into
the NIC) with a known-good machine on the same subnet that is being monitored by 
Whatsup
and see if the problem moves.

Here's a Cisco URL for troubleshooting ethernet.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1904.htm

David Toalson wrote:

>  , so I have two questions.  1.  Does a
> router rebroadcast a ping if there is a collision?  2.  Anything else
> you can think of that would cause this to happen on only the one device
> out of the 80?
> 
> David Toalson
> 816-701-4142
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Incredible Lab !!!!!

[Bradley J. Wilson]

You've studied this long...gathered all that equipment...and you're going
the *management* route?  You really want to be the pointy-haired boss type?
Are you nucking futz

*faints*...


- Original Message -
From: Quinton Maynard
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:59 PM
Subject: Incredible Lab !


Hey Guys,
I am throwing in the towel... Or more accurately, going the management
route, which leaves me no longer needing my CCIE LAB. This one is as
complete as it gets. It has absolutely everything (other than VOIP) and i
couldn't do a cost justification for that given it's only two points on the
lab. Here is what i have.. it is listed on EBAY..

"http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1200942925"

Cisco 7000 with RP, SSP, 2 6port EIP and ATM OC-3 MM.

Cisco Lightstream 100 with 3 OC-3 and 2 DS-3 cards

Cisco Catalyst 5000 with Sup 3 and Netflow, 12 port 10/100 and ATM LANE

Cisco 4500, with 2pt Serial, 2pt Ethernet, 2pt Token Ring, and DS-3 ATM

2520, 2509,2513,2513,2503,2502 (async included w/ 2509)

AGS+ with tons of ports

100b fx-tx transciever

nt1's

2 Maus

All Cables including cisco dce/dte

atm nics (3)

token ring nics (5)

12 port power bar/surge protector on rack

86" rack

multiple CCIE Books from Cisco Press

Courseware from Global Knowledge (ACRC & Frame)

Other courseware...

This is everything... if you can't pass your lab with this setup, you just
can't pass  Check it out at

"http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1200942925"




_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is funny... and SO true...

[Eddie Parra]

This is funny and so true...

http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=2756

-Eddie


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CiscoView Monitoring

[Paul Grassfield]

I currently have CiscoView 4.2 (1.0) and I am using it to monitor my 35xx
Catalyst switches.  I don't see how I can log these monitoring statistics to
an external file for future reference.  Does anyone know if this is possible
and if so how I could implement this?


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BGP lab set up.

[Frank Wells]

http://www.fatkid.com/html/challenges.html


>From: "Farooq Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Farooq Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: BGP lab set up.
>Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 13:23:30 -0500
>
>   Hi all, I have searched around and couldn't find any place 
>which could
>help me set up a BGP lab. I have 5 routers 4 2500 and one 3600. Please let
>me know if there is any place with the details of how to setup one. I will
>also appreciate if anyone has a set up like this and would like to share 
>the
>configs and connections with me, thanks in advance.
>
>Farooq Ali CCNA CCNP.
>
>
>
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Jeff Doyle p. 564 Frame-relay with OSPF

[Jean-Marc Gilbert]

Hello,

Well, the ospf network type and the real network type are not realy dependent :
you may specifie an "ospf network-type point-to-multypoint" on a point-to-point
frame-relay sub-interface... Thus, you have to ensure all your interfaces are
specifieing the same network type, and it should work fine.

Hope this help,
jean-marc

 
On 06-Dec-00 Ken Yeo wrote:
> In the book, on the spoke routers, all sub-interfaces didn't explicitly
> define multipoint or point-to-point inteface, I tried that and IOS 11.2/11.3
> requires multipoint or point-to-point interface type to be explicitly
> defined.
> 
> I think Doyle means to run point-to-point on the spoke routers because if
> they are multipoint, by default OSPF network types are mismatched between
> hub and spoke.
> 
> Am I correct? Or did I miss anything here?
> 
> Thanks!
> Ken
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
E-Mail: Jean-Marc Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07-Dec-00
Time: 22:48:55
--

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: how does traffic from CAT55 switch moule to Route switch modu le (RSM)?

[Tony Olzak]

The RSM uses the backplane of the switch. It doesn't need to be connected
externally.

Tony

- Original Message -
From: "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:00 AM
Subject: RE: how does traffic from CAT55 switch moule to Route switch modu
le (RSM)?


> Sorry , I send again, as I want to add one more question
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> 1)I have a cat 55 switch which got 2 X 10/100BaseTX Ethernet module and 1
X
> Route Switch Module (RSM), so, I have 48 ports on the switches module and
> divided into 3 VLANs some of ports were set to VLAN 1, 2 3, and the RSM
> module is connect thru our WAN router to world, and RSM, the layer 3
device
> is used to route the traffic between VLANs but I don't know how does the
> traffic from the switches module do to RSM module as there is no cable
> connection or it do internally?
>
> 2)I found my RSM module is configured 3 VLANs inteface, 100.100.100.99,
> 100.100.200.99, 100.100.300.99, but I can't see there are phyiscal
> interface. Why?
>
> Below shown the conf, sometarou is the switch module and SOMETAROU is the
> RSM module
>
> 3)From the sh cdp nei configuration in the switch module below, I wonder
why
> only VLAN1 connect to RSM module, I thought we configured VLANs 1 2 3 in
> switches module
>
>
> sometarou> sh cdp nei
> * - indicates vlan mismatch.
> # - indicates duplex mismatch.
> Port Device-ID   Port-ID
Platform
>  --- -
> 
>  2/1 SOMETAROU   Vlan1 cisco
> RSP2
>  3/1 066506067(somenosuke)   3/1
WS-C5505
>  3/2 066506067(somenosuke)   3/2
WS-C5505
>  3/3 066506067(somenosuke)   3/3
WS-C5505
>  3/4 066506067(somenosuke)   3/4
WS-C5505
> sometarou> session 2
> Trying Router-2...
> Connected to Router-2.
> Escape character is '^]'.
>
> 
> * Catalyst 5505 #2 *
> * RSM WS-X5302 *
> *SOMETAROU *
> 
>
>
> User Access Verification
>
> Password:
> SOMETAROU>sh cdp nei
> Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
>   S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater
>
> Device IDLocal Intrfce HoldtmeCapability  Platform  Port
ID
> 066507401(sometarou)Vlan1  132 T B S  WS-C5505  2/1
> SOMETAROU>
>
> ==
> De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
> is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
> onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
> de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
> ==
> The information contained in this message may be confidential
> and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
> receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
> herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
>
>
> ==
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> unsubscribe ccielab
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ISDN Switch Type basic-net3 - Question- Chuck or Priscilla a

[Jean-Marc Gilbert]

Hello,

I'm a french guy, so using basic-net3 quite often. all your exchange is amazing
me : when I configure a router whith basic-net3 (in france) I always obtain a
physical layer ACTIVE state !!! (or the telecom provider failed in setup the
line %-)

jean-marc 

On 07-Dec-00 David Wolsefer wrote:
> This is typical behavior for the basic-net3 switch. You won't see active
> until the call is placed, then everything will be normal.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Raul F. Fernandez
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ISDN Switch Type basic-net3 - Question- Chuck or Priscilla any
> input?
> 
> 
> Dear folks,
> 
> I would like to do some research on the strange behavior of the switch =
> type basic-net3.
> 
> Usually when a show ISDN status command is done and an ISDN BRI is =
> correctly configured
> 
> it will show the physical layer as "ACTIVE" unless backup interface =
> commands are in use.
> 
> When backup commands are in use the output of the show isdn status show =
> the physical
> 
> layer as "DEACTIVATED". This switch type is used in Europe has the =
> behavior of showing the=20
> 
> physical layer as "DEACTIVATED" and no backup commands are being used. =
> This causes some
> 
> confusion where I work at. Anyway, I would like to research this further =
> but seems like the CCO
> 
> is only interested in how to enter this switch type in a router =
> configuration and other sources which
> 
> I have looked are very sketchy on information on the switch capabilites. =
> Any information
> 
> would be appreciated.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Raul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
E-Mail: Jean-Marc Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07-Dec-00
Time: 23:05:35
--

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hub-to-Switch connectivity issue

[Christopher Larson]

1) I suppose that depends on the manufacturer. On most equipment placing
a striaght through cable on an MDI-X port makes it a crossover at the
port. That is the port is wired to cross 1,2,3 and 6 (hence the port
name MDI-X) so that you don't have to do it by changing the cable. So it
is not true that you MUST use a crossover cable per se, as the MDI-X
port does the crossing for you. 


2) Hubs do not care about and have nothing to do with layer 2 at all.
Only layer 1. That being the physical connection. They simply repeat the
signals they recieve on one port out all other ports. Hubs do not know
the rule of CSMA/CD, they are manufactured to comply with the
requirements for physical connectivity. When a hub detects a collision
it does not respond to it except to sense that there was a voltage on
these pairs so I will make this little light turn red everytime I sense
voltage on these pairs. If a hub knew and participated in CSMA/CD, it
would backoff from transmitting everytime it sensed a collision and
before it ever repeated any data it would have to "listen" to the wire
before transmitting which it does not.


-Original Message-
From: Bradley J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 3:17 PM
To: cisco
Subject: Hub-to-Switch connectivity issue


Okay...I've been digesting the responses I've received about this issue,
and
what I've come up with can be reduced to two comments:

1) The fact that flipping the MDI/MDI-X switch didn't initially work
leads
me to believe that I wasn't using it right.  The fact remains that
connecting a hub to a switch must be accomplished using a crossover
cable.

2) Why is that?  It's true that connecting devices at different layers
of
the OSI model requires a straight-through cable, and that connecting
devices
at the same layer requires a crossover cable.  So isn't it true that
switches are layer 2, and hubs are layer 1?  No.  Hubs are actually
layer 2
devices, and here's why: while a hub may not understand or care about
source
and destination MAC addresses, checksums, or what's in the "type" field,
it
*does* know the rules of CSMACD communication, and has to play by the
same
rules as other layer 2 devices.  Therefore, hubs can be considered Layer
2
devices, and thus must be connected to switches with a crossover cable.

Anyone see anything wrong with my synopsis above?  Let me know.  Just be
careful with your caps lock key. ;-)

Thanks,

BJ




_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks to Helena...I passed BSCN 2.0 today!

[Ariel]

I met Helena on this forum.  I hope all of you find someone as wonderful as
her.

My 1/2 cent on the Boson exam. Scored 850 +

Know your commands well.  The show and router command format will be asked
of you.  Know what mode the router must be in to enter the exam.
BGP for me was most of the test.  Know the "basics", and commands.  Know BGP
well or you will not do as well.
Then route optimization theories.  Know route maps and stuff.
EIGRP was second  in line.  Understand how it interacts with redistribution
and NBMA.
RIP and IGRP show up only as Classful vs Classless.  What are the attributes
of each?
OSPF, I can't recall one question.
Redistribution, about four questions.
Do you know how routing protocols pick best path?  You should before going
in.

How did I study?
I listened to others on this forum.  You will get lots of helpful tips from
others.  So, that said, thank you everyone including yourself.  Hope when
you pass a test you announce it here with some tips so we can congratulate
you.

I purchased the Exam Cram ISBN 1576106330 for BSCN Routing Exam 640-503.  I
studied and lived this book for two weeks.  This book provides a good
overview of what can be expected from the exam.  However, not enough
material is provided.  You will need to supplement this with a better book
or don't buy this.  At the time I purchased this, no BSCN books were
available.  Oh, there are some concepts like BGP and EIGRP similarities that
it does not explain well.

I then was approved, narrowly, to take the Cisco BSCN class.  This was
helpful since there were issues with the book I was not clear on.  I suggest
you always study before a class.  Classroom is for review not as a fresh
introduction to material.didn't they teach you this in college?  Cisco
BSCN is tough since it was my first Cisco class.  So get lots of rest and
plan to stay till the end.  BGP is introduced last, funny since it is the
bulk of the test.  Stay late and do the labs

The NetCerts BSCN book was pretty good.  The BGP part was great for
explaining the concept really well.  Other than that, there are several
chapters I did not read.  The chapters I skipped did not show up on the
test.  Concentrate on IGRP, RIP, EIGRP, BGP, Route filters and
optimization...thats it!

Oh, the Cisco paper on the website 68 pages or so was not too helpful.  If
you really want to know BGP, this is the way to go.  But be sure to apply to
an ISP to get the most of it.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/icsbgp4.htm

I'm a slow learner so it took me three months to study.  Here is some tips:
Don't watch movies or television.  BIG waste of time.
Make flash cards
Get Boson's first exam for BSCN. If you don't, send ME your $100.
Listen to yourself in traffic.  Ha! Tape record the lessons and listen to
them instead of music or car horns.
Most of all, be good to your spouse and family.  This will take a lot out of
them too.

I could tell you word for word what will be on the exam, but what good will
this do you.  You will pass the exams just to get fired on the job for
incompetence.
Enjoy.






_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: CID EXAM ALIVE AND WELL!!

[Christopher J. Dosch]

WOW, that's strange!  I live in NO VA and I called yesterday, first
Prometric and then Cisco, both representatives said no go on both the beta
and the 3.0!!



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Andre' Paree-Huff
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:00 AM
To: Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
Subject: CID EXAM ALIVE AND WELL!!


I just called Prometric and scheduled my CID 640-025 exam for next =
Tuesday morning.  It is alive and well.  The lady I spoke to said she =
has been scheduling at least a couple people for this exam every day.  I =
stated that I heard it was pulled and she said they have gotten no word =
on it.  So as of now I am schedule to sit the CID exam next week...


Andr=E9 Paree-Huff
A+, ASE, CCDA, CCNP
MCSE+I, NET+, I-NET+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AOL AIM: pareehuff


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: stacks decoder

[Aaron K. Dixon]

You can use the stack decoder on cisco's web site.

http://www.cisco.com/stack/stackdecoder.shtml

Regards,
Aaron K. Dixon

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian Lodwick
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: stacks decoder


Hey group does anyone know where I can get software to interpret the output
of a show stacks command?

>>>Brian

_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ISDN Switch Type basic-net3 - Question- Chuck or Priscilla anyinput?

[JULIO CESAR GARCIA ALCANTAR]

Can you send us configuration example, what model of cisco router are you
using
thanks
Julio Garcia

On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, David Wolsefer wrote:

> This is typical behavior for the basic-net3 switch. You won't see active
> until the call is placed, then everything will be normal.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Raul F. Fernandez
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ISDN Switch Type basic-net3 - Question- Chuck or Priscilla any
> input?
> 
> 
> Dear folks,
> 
> I would like to do some research on the strange behavior of the switch =
> type basic-net3.
> 
> Usually when a show ISDN status command is done and an ISDN BRI is =
> correctly configured
> 
> it will show the physical layer as "ACTIVE" unless backup interface =
> commands are in use.
> 
> When backup commands are in use the output of the show isdn status show =
> the physical
> 
> layer as "DEACTIVATED". This switch type is used in Europe has the =
> behavior of showing the=20
> 
> physical layer as "DEACTIVATED" and no backup commands are being used. =
> This causes some
> 
> confusion where I work at. Anyway, I would like to research this further =
> but seems like the CCO
> 
> is only interested in how to enter this switch type in a router =
> configuration and other sources which
> 
> I have looked are very sketchy on information on the switch capabilites. =
> Any information
> 
> would be appreciated.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Raul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PIX floppy help

[James Riggs]

I am new to this list, and new to the PIX firewall.  I just bought one and
was trying to back up the default config to a floppy disk before I start
playing with it.  At first I was getting a message indicating that there was
no floppy installed.  I opened the case and made sure the cables were
securely connected and the behavior changed.  I no longer get an error, the
light on the drive indicates activity, but there are no files on the disk
when the “wr floppy” command finishes executing.  If I try to change the
hostname and “wr floppy” the config, I would expect something to be on the
disk, or an error indicating that nothing could be written.  Is there
anything that I am missing here, or does it just sound like a bad drive?

Thanks in advance

James Riggs

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Publishing Date?

[Coker, Michael]

I don't know "who" it will differ from, but I know "how" it will differ from
volume one.

It covers BGP, multicasting, etc.

> -Original Message-
> From: Newton, James A. (AIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 12:25 PM
> To: 'Adam Hickey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Publishing Date?
> 
> 
> Does anyone know who it will differ from volume one?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Hickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Publishing Date?
> 
> 
> Anyone know when Doyle is going to publish Vol 2?
> 
> Adam Hickey
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Incredible Lab !!!!!

[Jeff Duchin]

If anybody in the Baltimore/D.C. area buys this, let me know... I'll bring
the beer.

Jeff

""Quinton Maynard"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hey Guys,
> I am throwing in the towel... Or more accurately, going the management
> route, which leaves me no longer needing my CCIE LAB. This one is as
> complete as it gets. It has absolutely everything (other than VOIP) and i
> couldn't do a cost justification for that given it's only two points on
the
> lab. Here is what i have.. it is listed on EBAY..
>
> "http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1200942925"
>
> Cisco 7000 with RP, SSP, 2 6port EIP and ATM OC-3 MM.
>
> Cisco Lightstream 100 with 3 OC-3 and 2 DS-3 cards
>
> Cisco Catalyst 5000 with Sup 3 and Netflow, 12 port 10/100 and ATM LANE
>
> Cisco 4500, with 2pt Serial, 2pt Ethernet, 2pt Token Ring, and DS-3 ATM
>
> 2520, 2509,2513,2513,2503,2502 (async included w/ 2509)
>
> AGS+ with tons of ports
>
> 100b fx-tx transciever
>
> nt1's
>
> 2 Maus
>
> All Cables including cisco dce/dte
>
> atm nics (3)
>
> token ring nics (5)
>
> 12 port power bar/surge protector on rack
>
> 86" rack
>
> multiple CCIE Books from Cisco Press
>
> Courseware from Global Knowledge (ACRC & Frame)
>
> Other courseware...
>
> This is everything... if you can't pass your lab with this setup, you just
> can't pass  Check it out at
>
> "http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1200942925"
>
>
>

_
> Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Pls help!

[lili zhao]

Dear all,

Anyone have a idea where I can find free on-line CCDA
test or download?  THANKS!

snow

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: stacks decoder

[Kane, Christopher A.]

It's under the TAC Support on Cisco's page. You paste your output and
provide an email address, if different than the address in your CCO profile.
It usually comes back in just a few minutes.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Lodwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: stacks decoder


Hey group does anyone know where I can get software to interpret the output 
of a show stacks command?

>>>Brian

_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

URT

[Jeff Duchin]

Okay guys and gals with a URT background

Since the new URT for CW2k LMS is not out yet, we had to purchase CWSI and
the old URT until the new one comes out (have to have dynamic vlans)

...anyways I just installed it in my test-bed today and wanted to know if
anyone has used this on MACs or Win2k machines. I read something on CCO
about MAC, Linux and Unix support (as well as WIN95/98/NT of course) but
wanted to get a heads up anything that might save me some grief.

Also, I've got everything running with CWSI and so far as I can tell
everything is configured as per the directions... but I can't seem to get my
test users (WIN95/NT) logged in. The URT.Bat is on the PDC and I pushed out
the Client to the Workstation... also made the URT logon Vlan and assigned
it to it's own vlan (2 as I wanted to keep it seperate from the management
vlan) with a 10.10.2.2/23 on the server and 10.10.2.1/23 on the router int.
I do have a helper-address for the DHCP server... do I need to add one for
the URT server?

Any replies much appreciated.
Jeff


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: VLSM

[Ariel]

Prefix = Subnet mask ,   I was very confused of this until recently.  Most
books will go back and forth on the terms.

Classful: RIP1 and IGRP: Will not pass subnet mask in routing updates.  So
you cannot use this with Summarization or VLSM.  It restricts to classful
addresses.  This means Class A, B, or C.

Classless: OSPF, EIGRP,  IS-IS,  Supports VLSM.  CIDR  aka Supernetting.
You can adjust the subnet mask so not to restrict you to classul addresses.

VLSM:  Variable Lenth Subnet Mask,  I think of this as subnetting in a
subnet.

Get the Exam Cram book.  It will give you an overview of the BSCN material.
This book helped me pretty good.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tough VPN question

[Travis Gamble]

One thing I've noticed is that Windows tries to cache passwords.  When they
first turn on their computer, they aren't generally connected to the VPN, so
they can't login normally at that point.  Make sure they are still setup to
logon to the domain, even if they can't.  Have them enter the correct
username and password at the login prompt, and just say "OK" when it
complains that it can't find a domain controller.  Keep hitting OK until it
boots, without the domain controller.  This will cache the correct
username/password combination, so that when it does try and connect to an NT
server, it will send the correct information.  Also, as others have said,
make sure you have WINS or an LMHOSTS file working to allow them to find the
domain controller(s).

Hope this helps,

Travis Gamble
Systems Engineer
Attache Group Inc.

- Original Message -
From: "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:18 AM
Subject: tough VPN question


> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> though.
>
> Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> machines were already added to domain)
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Jim
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Live Todd Lammle chat tonight

[Andy Barkl]

Todd Lammle Preps You for the CCNA Exam
This Thursday (Dec. 7) join author and trainer Todd Lammle for
a crunch session on the CCNA exam.
** CCNA Details: Thursday
The session this week runs from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. Pacific time
(9 to 10 p.m. Eastern time).
Your participation could earn you free study products from
Sybex, including the CCNA e-trainer, Virtual Lab, and
CCNA Study Guide. http://www.sybex.com/.
Download a copy of the Cisco exam objectives at
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/
testing/pdf/ccna_507.pdf

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: This is funny... and SO true...

[Chuck Larrieu]

Hahahahahahaha!1

I've actually read both of these RFC's.  Sure serves somebody right!

Chuck

-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Eddie Parra
Sent:   Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:39 PM
To: Cisco Group Study; CCIE Lab Group Study
Subject:This is funny... and SO true...

This is funny and so true...

http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=2756

-Eddie


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

good book for CCIE R&S exam

[Brian Dellong]

Please refer a good book for CCIE Routing and
Switching exam. 

thanks
brian

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Publishing Date?

[Dusty Harper]

Volume 2 will cover the exterior routing protocolsie BGP 

-Original Message-
From: Newton, James A. (AIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 12:25 PM
To: 'Adam Hickey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Publishing Date?


Does anyone know who it will differ from volume one?

-Original Message-
From: Adam Hickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Publishing Date?


Anyone know when Doyle is going to publish Vol 2?

Adam Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [RE: tough VPN question]

[Wayne Hu]

Altiga VPN Client works with Pix 5.2


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sam Munzani
Sent: December 7, 2000 4:38 PM
To: Manishkumar Patel; Scott Morris; Jim Bond; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RE: tough VPN question]


Does anybody know if a Altiga Client software will work with PIX? If it
does, Altiga client has options for WINS settings.

Sam

> I beleive your problem is WINS lookup.
> Create a LMHOST file without any extension.
> Write following line in your file
>
>   #PRE #DOM
> Do not Include < > signs, Just replace the words.
> DONT forget NO EXTENSION to file.
> Save file in WINNT\SYSTEM32\Drivers\ETC directory.
> You have to copy this file on every PC. the same folder.
> Good luck
> MK
> CCNA, MCSE, CNE
>
>
> "Scott Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your problem is likely the propgation of broadcasts...  Or lack thereof.
> > One thing you can do (I'm assuming you have a router before (LAN-side)
the
> > PIX) is set up an ip-helper address to forward UDP-level broadcasts
(like
> > 138/139 Netbios) to the NT server.
> >
> > The other thing you can do is bypass that broadcast thought process by
> using
> > LMHosts files on the workstations at the branch office.  That will
pre-load
> > (if you use the #PRE designation) the NetBIOS cache and give you IP
> > addresses to go to.  So if you have IP reachability, things will work
just
> > fine then.
> >
> > In LMHOSTS. :
> >
> > (ip address) (Netbios name) #PRE #DOM:(domain name if domain controller)
> >
> > Also, to refresh without rebooting the PCs, "nbtstat -R"
> >
> > Hope this helps!
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Jim Bond
> > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:19 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: tough VPN question
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> > office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch
> > office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> > fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives
> > from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> > logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> > though.
> >
> > Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> > machines were already added to domain)
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> > http://shopping.yahoo.com/
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> > unsubscribe ccielab
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> unsubscribe ccielab

___
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFC Reading List

[Chuck Larrieu]

Idle curiosity, friends. Which RFC's are you reading?

I've read 1771 ( BGP4 ) and I am presently going through 1812 ( requirements
for IP routers )

1812 references a number of other RFC's, of which perhaps 1112 ( ICMP ) and
1256 ( ICMP Router Discovery Messages, 1120 ( requirements for internet
hosts )

I plan on looking through 2328 ( OSPF ) and 1519 ( CIDR ) I have a few more
printed out, things like TCP and ICMP and RIP

Other posting I have read over time and from various sources suggest 1997
 BGP Communities ), 2796 (BGP Route Reflection),  1965 ( BGP Communities )
and 1795 ( DLSw )

I have some others I printed out a while back. TCP, RIP, IP, if memory
serves

The Cisco site itself recommends reading RFC's, but makes gives no
specifics.

What are folks on this list reading? Recommending?


Chuck
--
I am Locutus, a CCIE Lab Proctor. Xx_Brain_dumps_xX are futile. Your life as
it has been is over ( if you hope to pass ) From this time forward, you will
study US!
( apologies to the folks at Star Trek TNG )

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]