VLAN routing [7:13465]

2001-07-24 Thread SolutionFinder SolutionFinder

Hello colleagues, I have a question regarding the configuration of the
routing device when a VLAN is separated by two or more routers. Do I have
to add an interface for the respective VLAN on every router ?  Vlan 20
--> Router A --> Router B --> Router C --> Vlan 20 Do all three routers
need the 'interface VLAN 20' statement in their configurations ? Thanks
for your help in advance. Regards, Hans



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13465&t=13465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



HELP needed ON FR SWITCHING ON ISDN [7:13466]

2001-07-24 Thread adarsh singh

Hi 


Needs some insight if you can provide .


My set up is like 

router(1)
BRI--isdn-(BRI)router(2)Serail---FR
SWITCH.router(3)

My layer 2 comes up when route1 dials into router 2 , but can't ping router
3. THE pvc between router 3 & fr swicth is up .If any one has caried out fr
switching on ISDN pls give me some insight on this .All are cisco routers,
with compatible IOS.


Regards
Adarsh 


http://www.monsterindia.com - The Best Jobs. For the Best Minds.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13466&t=13466
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ISL configuration [7:13094]

2001-07-24 Thread Tansel Akyuz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Yes I know, but some RF equipments have a fastethernet



Tansel Akyuz
Project Manager
Sim Information Technologies
Phone :   +90 - 216 - 537 73 82
Fax :   +90 - 216 - 574 70 78
GSM  :   +90 - 533 - 523 34 67
PGP Signature : http://www.sentinus.ws/SuhaTanselAkyuz.txt


- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 6:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL configuration [7:13094]


To the best of my knowledge it will only work with a fastethernet
interface.

Peter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.0

iQA/AwUBO10qGTo2DiqLcdj0EQJmGACeNuKUYAq8cesB5JBD0DkAKDcBwOYAnRIQ
pNe1G2hSk4//3EEkQrHR0wo2
=AkN9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13468&t=13094
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



eyes [7:13467]

2001-07-24 Thread

Hi! How are you?

I send you this file in order to have your advice

See you later. Thanks

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/mixed which had a
name of eyes.zip.pif]

[GroupStudy.com removed a section which didn't have a content-type header]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13467&t=13467
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT: Tools for disk space/cpu/memory utilization. [7:13464]

2001-07-24 Thread Richard Bosire

Hie

Get hold of cricket, should be able to meet some of your needs
http://cricket.sourceforge.net/

./bosire


--
___
+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$

richard bosire
ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae]


Ryan Ngai Hon Kong wrote:

> Sorry, this is a little bit off the topic.
>
> Does anybody have recommendation tools to monitor the server disk space,
CPU
> or memory
> utilization? I believe HP NNM have similar feature whereby the server is
> running on SNMP daemon.
> Can I use some similar tools to access to the mibs in the server?
>
> Regards,
> Ryan




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13469&t=13464
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



How to keep the clock always correct in a router? [7:13470]

2001-07-24 Thread Derric Gu

Everytime when I reload the router, its clock will be changed to year 1993.
And the time of the router is important for vpn, how can I keep the clock of
the router always correct?

Derric Gu




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13470&t=13470
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to keep the clock always correct in a router? [7:13470]

2001-07-24 Thread Arun

hi
It can be done in many ways ..you can configure the ntp server from which it
can get the clock.you can use the comand
ntp server X.X.X.X where X is your ip addres for the NTP server.And also you
can use server for providing clock to other equipments on the network u can
downlaod the ntp server to ur network and get that synchronized from other
ntp servers around the world and then use this as reference for ur
equipments.you can get some from www.download.com  and look for ntp servers
in search query.

regards
Arun Sharma
""Derric Gu""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Everytime when I reload the router, its clock will be changed to year
1993.
> And the time of the router is important for vpn, how can I keep the clock
of
> the router always correct?
>
> Derric Gu




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13471&t=13470
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Routing problem. PLS help -- Urgent [7:13474]

2001-07-24 Thread Dave W.

Hi there,

I have the following config:

R1750(L) --- R7206 -- R1750(R)

R1750(L):
Serial 0: 20.1.1.1/30

R7206:
Serial 0: 20.1.1.2/30
Serial 1: some IP
Tunnel 1: 10.4.1.2/30 over the serial link 1

R1750(R):
Tunnel 1: 10.4.1.2/30 over the serial link 0
Serial 0: some IP

At the left-hand side R1750, the routing table is:
0.0.0.0 20.1.1.2
At the R7206, the routing table is:
20.1.1.0/30 known via connected
10.4.1.0/30 known via connected
At the right-hand side R1750, the routing table is:
20.1.1.0/24 known via static, directly connected, via Tunnel 0

My problem is that at the righ-hand side R1750, I am not able to ping
20.1.1.1 and vice verse.

Can someone pls suggest me if there is any fault that causes the problem.
Your help is really appreciated.

Regards,
David

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13474&t=13474
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Configuring VWIC MFT G703 [7:11516]

2001-07-24 Thread Eric Lam

if you are config. for a voice E1, then DSP resource is needed.

quote
Q. How is DSP resource sharing across High-Density Voice network modules
(NM-HDV) and Fast Ethernet Mixed Media network modules (NM-xFE2W) carried
out across the Cisco 3660 backplane?

A. First of all, NM-HDV provides the spare DSPs and NM-xFE2W or other NM-HDV
use the spare DSPs in a Cisco 3660 platform. Spare DSPs on NM-HDV to voice
channels on NM-xFE2W or other NM-HDV are statically mapped at configuration
time. The following should be noted during DSP resource sharing
configuration on a MIX-enabled Cisco 3660 platform:
-Each NM-HDV can be configured to participate in DSP Resource Pool or not
-If not enough DSPs are left on a NM-HDV, the configuration of the
ds0/pri-group will not succeed
-All NM-HDVs and NM-xFE2W participating in the DSP Resource Pool must be
synchronized to the same clock
-All NM-HDVs that participate in the DSP Resource Pool should be configured
with the same codec complexity
-NM-HDVs need not be a PDVM for the DSP Resource Pool functionality to
operate

unquote
Eric Lam
""Muhammad Shakeel Shamsi""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am having problem configuring this cardinstalled this card on the 3660
> with 12.1(1)T the Chassis that hold the VWic card is NM-1FE2W.
> Having problem configuring both as framed for supporting Dual E1 on the
> card, interface e1 2/0 is configured as framed and the other e1 2/1 is
> configured as unframed. Both framed are not working, please help me out or
> possible send me a sample config.
>
> Thank you




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13475&t=11516
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to keep the clock always correct in a router? [7:13470]

2001-07-24 Thread Tony Medeiros

Use NTP.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/ffun
_c/fcfprt3/fcf012.htm
(watch the word wrap)

Tony
#6172

- Original Message -
From: Derric Gu 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 2:00 AM
Subject: How to keep the clock always correct in a router? [7:13470]


> Everytime when I reload the router, its clock will be changed to year
1993.
> And the time of the router is important for vpn, how can I keep the clock
of
> the router always correct?
>
> Derric Gu




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13472&t=13470
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Routing problem. PLS help -- Urgent [7:13474]

2001-07-24 Thread Arun

Hi
20.1.1.0/30
 10.4.1.0/30
 20.1.1.0/24
check above the subnet mask .do see anything there.

regards
""Dave W.""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi there,
>
> I have the following config:
>
> R1750(L) --- R7206 -- R1750(R)
>
> R1750(L):
> Serial 0: 20.1.1.1/30
>
> R7206:
> Serial 0: 20.1.1.2/30
> Serial 1: some IP
> Tunnel 1: 10.4.1.2/30 over the serial link 1
>
> R1750(R):
> Tunnel 1: 10.4.1.2/30 over the serial link 0
> Serial 0: some IP
>
> At the left-hand side R1750, the routing table is:
> 0.0.0.0 20.1.1.2
> At the R7206, the routing table is:
> 20.1.1.0/30 known via connected
> 10.4.1.0/30 known via connected
> At the right-hand side R1750, the routing table is:
> 20.1.1.0/24 known via static, directly connected, via Tunnel 0
>
> My problem is that at the righ-hand side R1750, I am not able to ping
> 20.1.1.1 and vice verse.
>
> Can someone pls suggest me if there is any fault that causes the problem.
> Your help is really appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13476&t=13474
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to keep the clock always correct in a router? [7:13470]

2001-07-24 Thread Charlie Hartwell

With the smaller routers (700 up to 3600) you do not get an internal
battery to keep the clock correct when the router reboots. You will
need to use an NTP server for these.
 If you have access to the internet then there are plenty of public
domain NTP servers that are free to use (just search in Google), if
you have no internet access then you will have to configure an NTP
server on your network. Most Unix platforms come with an inbuilt NTP
server and I am pretty sure that you can get 3rd party software for
NT machines to do the job.

Good luck!

Charlie

 --- Derric Gu  wrote: > Everytime when I reload
the router, its clock will be changed to
> year 1993.
> And the time of the router is important for vpn, how can I keep the
> clock of
> the router always correct?
> 
> Derric Gu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13473&t=13470
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread cheekin

FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001

 US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135  267
CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245

cheekin




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13477&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Plugging into console port rebooted switch ... [7:13478]

2001-07-24 Thread evans jason

recently i plugged a laptop using KeaTerm term em software into the console
port of a 2924 switch and it immediately rebooted the switch. i repeated the
operation a 2nd time making sure i didn't have a reload command in the
waiting and it happened again. has this every happened to anyone? if so, any
ideas on how to not let it happen again - this switch is a production switch
w/ all the NT servers.

thanks,

jason


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13478&t=13478
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Plugging into console port rebooted switch ... [7:13478]

2001-07-24 Thread Arun

Hi
Is it rebooted the switch when u started the KeaTerm term software or it
just rebooted the switch when u plugged in the console cable.If it rebooted
when u started the KeaTerm term  try using the windows hyperterminal and see
if the problem occurs again .I think it should not

Regards

""evans jason""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> recently i plugged a laptop using KeaTerm term em software into the
console
> port of a 2924 switch and it immediately rebooted the switch. i repeated
the
> operation a 2nd time making sure i didn't have a reload command in the
> waiting and it happened again. has this every happened to anyone? if so,
any
> ideas on how to not let it happen again - this switch is a production
switch
> w/ all the NT servers.
>
> thanks,
>
> jason




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13479&t=13478
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Pls sovle My problem [7:13480]

2001-07-24 Thread Syed Ali

hi i am sorry for the irrelvence issue but the problem
was that i m in trouble and i am not been able to find
any resource

I have a Win2K servers, and we'd love to switch to
iis5 to simplify our administration
load.  We just can't figure out how to force IIS to
hide the contents
of the FTP root directory if a client backs up from
their virtual
directory to the FTP root. I've tested a myriad of
NTFS permissions
combinations with no luck.  Here is my scenario in a
bit more detail:

SITE DIRECTORY STRUCTURE:
FTP_Site
->FTPRootDir
  ->Client1_Virtual_Dir
 ->Client 1 files and directories
  ->Client2_Virtual_Dir
 ->Client 2 files and directories
  ->Client3_Virtual_Dir
etc, etc, etc

BEHAVIOR:
When Client 1 logs in to the FTP server, their ID and
pw point them to
their virtual directory.  They have the correct rights
in that
directory.  If Client 1 initiates a "cd .." to backup
to the
FTPRootDir, then initiates an "ls", they see:

Client1_Virtual_Dir
Client2_Virtual_Dir
Client3_Virtual_Dir

If Client 1 attempts to CD into Client 2 or Client 3's
directories,
they're blocked by NTFS permissions. That's fine.
What's not fine is
the fact that they can list the directories.

LIMITATIONS:
I cannot create seperate FTP sites for each client. 
We have tons of
code that refers to that single FTP site.

REQUESTED SOLUTION:
There are two that would suit our needs:
1> Clients cannot backup to the FTP root.  They only
have rights in
their virtual dir.
2> Clients CAN backup to the FTP root, but only see
their respective
virtual directories when they do an "ls"

For those of you still reading, thanks for your time!
Syed Zeeshan Ali


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13480&t=13480
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ACS2.6 users on Cluster Servers!! [7:13481]

2001-07-24 Thread Magdy H. Ibrahim

Hi guys,

I installed ACS2.6 on 2 nodes cluster , using Win2k to provide high
availability , so when any ACS service stop on one node the ACS will
failover to the other node .
The problem I'm facing is that the ACS configuration replicated well when
ACS moves from one node to the other , but the users database not !! , So
are there any way to replicate the users database from Windows registry , If
answer is yes , which key I'll need to copy ?
Any suggestions will be appriciated .

Thanks in advance,

Magdy




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13481&t=13481
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread Christopher Supino

Interesting. What is the source of this info?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
cheekin
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Certification Statistics [7:13477]


FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001

 US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135  267
CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245

cheekin




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13483&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Just passed 640-503 [7:13485]

2001-07-24 Thread Phantom

I just passed the test

It was very difficult, lots of BGP and OSPF also some scenario questions.
like select all the commands that is needed to achieve the following config,
also a couple of Q's on what command is needed to do something.

Study and you will pass, I used Cisco end sybex books and tests that come
with them,

Good luck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13485&t=13485
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



what is IGP, what is IBGP [7:13484]

2001-07-24 Thread xie rootstock

it is confusing me very much, please help me, thanks


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13484&t=13484
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread cheekin

The numbers are the total number of engineers certified up to May this year.

EMEA stands for Europe, Middle East, Africa.

cheekin


- Original Message -
From: 
To: "cheekin" 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 18:14
Subject: Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]


>
> Very interesting figures . Also the figures given indicates upto May or in
> MAy alone?What is EMEA?
>
>
>
>
> "cheekin"
>  home.net>cc:
> Sent by: Subject: Certification
Statistics [7:13477]
> nobody@groups
> tudy.com
>
>
> 07/24/2001
> 03:02 PM
> Please
> respond to
> "cheekin"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001
>
>  US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
> CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135  267
> CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
> CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
> CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
> CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245
>
> cheekin




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13486&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ACS2.6 users on Cluster Servers!! [7:13481]

2001-07-24 Thread Farhan Ahmed

Cisco Secure ACS operates as a Windows NT or Windows 2000 service and
controls the authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) of users
accessing networks. Cisco Secure ACS operates with Windows NT Server version
4.0 and Windows 2000 Server. Provided that Microsoft Clustering Services are
not installed, Cisco Secure ACS operates on Windows 2000 Advanced Server and
Windows 2000 Datacenter Server.

u might look 4 some 3rd part clustering software
like doubletake

-Original Message-
From: Magdy H. Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACS2.6 users on Cluster Servers!! [7:13481]


Hi guys,

I installed ACS2.6 on 2 nodes cluster , using Win2k to provide high
availability , so when any ACS service stop on one node the ACS will
failover to the other node .
The problem I'm facing is that the ACS configuration replicated well when
ACS moves from one node to the other , but the users database not !! , So
are there any way to replicate the users database from Windows registry , If
answer is yes , which key I'll need to copy ?
Any suggestions will be appriciated .

Thanks in advance,

Magdy




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13487&t=13481
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: what is IGP, what is IBGP [7:13484]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Van Oene

An Interior Gateway Protocol, IGP, provides routing within an Autonomous
System.  Interior Border Gateway Protocol, IBGP, enabled routing between
Autonomous systems by allowing exterior routing information to be shared
among peers within the same autonomous system.  Also, IGP is a generic term
for a set of protocols where as IBGP is a specific protocol.

Hope that helps? 

Pete


*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 7/24/2001 at 7:43 AM xie rootstock wrote:

>it is confusing me very much, please help me, thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13488&t=13484
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: redundant MSFC synchronization problem [7:12360]

2001-07-24 Thread Lopez, Robert

Michael,

Could you point me to documentation regarding the "native ios" option you
used. Thanks!

Robert

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: redundant MSFC synchronization problem [7:12360]


It's possible to run the MSFCs 2 ways.. in High Avail (under the Hybrid
CatOS/IOS) you need to enable the high system availability on the CatOS side
then configure the 2 MSFCs with HSRP.  Otherwise, you have to make those
changes to both MSFCs manually (AFAIK).

That's why it's advantageous to use the Native IOS, so that you can
configure (what appears to be) a single router with a boatload of
interfaces, and all sync and replication between the active and redundant
Sup are automatic (by default in Native IOS 12.x and higher).  You can run
the Native (aka Supervisor IOS) for Enhanced High Availability in which case
the one of the Sup/MSFC acts as a total physical backup for the other (i.e.
it appears as one Sup/MSFC).  We just did some testing on our 6509 today by
yanking out the active Sup and timing it until the other came up.  Took
about 1 minute before the standby Sup initialized all of the line cards and
was up and running completely (not bad considering it's just slightly
longer than an STP recalc).

Fun stuff.

Mike W.

"cisco skin"  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You need at least 12.1(3a)E4 for high availabilty on the MSFC's.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/si/casi/ca6000/tech/hafc6_wp.htm
>
> Jeff
>
> ""cisco_fun""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I am facing a weird problem with the redundant MSFC card.
> >
> >
> > We have three subnets all configured in a single vlan.192.168.1.0,
> > 192.168.2.0 and 192.168.3.0
> >
> >
> > The MSFC is running OSPF and the 192.168.0.0 network is being
advertised.
> >
> >
> > If both the MSFC's are enabled ( i.e. module 15 and module 16 are
enabled)
> > one subnet (192.168.2.0) uses MSFC1 as the primary module whereas the
> other
> > two subnets (192.168.1.0 and 192.168.3.0) use the MSFC2 as the primary
> subnet.
> >
> >
> > If I telnet from the 192.168.3.0 subnet to the MSFC IP then the "sh ip
> > route" command displays only the directly connected routes. If I telnet
to
> > the MSFC IP from the other subnets I can view all the OSPF learnt
subnets
> as
> > well as the directly connected subnets.
> >
> >
> > If I make any changes in the MSFC1 configuration, the same does not get
> > replicated in the MSFC2 configuration and viceversa. The IOS version on
> the
> > MSFC is 12.0(3) XE2 and the CatOS version on the sup1A is 5.3(2) CSX
> >
> >
> > The output of the sh fm features command:
> >
> >
> > MSFC15#sh fm features
> > Designated MSFC: 1 Non-designated MSFC:2
> >
> >
> > Redundancy Status: designated
> >
> >
> > Any help will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Thanks and Regards ...
> >
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at
> http://email.indiatimes.com
> > Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM and Audio-Books from
http://www.planetmonline.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13489&t=12360
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread Ronny Jonathan

This information is very interesting ...
May I know where you get this information ? Is it reliable

Regards,
Ronny
- Original Message - 
From: "cheekin" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:32 PM
Subject: Certification Statistics [7:13477]


> FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001
> 
>  US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
> CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135  267
> CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
> CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
> CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
> CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245
> 
> cheekin




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13490&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



SCHOLARSHIP [7:13491]

2001-07-24 Thread

Hi! How are you?

I send you this file in order to have your advice

See you later. Thanks

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/mixed which had a
name of SCHOLARSHIP.doc.pif]

[GroupStudy.com removed a section which didn't have a content-type header]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13491&t=13491
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Plugging into console port rebooted switch ... [7:13478]

2001-07-24 Thread Rossetti, Stan

If you are using a windows 2000 machine, you may need to upgrade the ios
version on the switch.  I ran into this problem on some catalyst switches
that we are uing in our network.  This a documented bug that you can find
using bug tracker.


Thanks

Stan Rossetti


NASA - PriSMS
Advanced Technology Group
IP Phone:  (256) 961-7097
Voice:  (256) 544-5031
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beeper:  544-1183 pin 0112

CCDA, CCNA, CCSE


-Original Message-
From: Arun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 4:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Plugging into console port rebooted switch ... [7:13478]


Hi
Is it rebooted the switch when u started the KeaTerm term software or it
just rebooted the switch when u plugged in the console cable.If it rebooted
when u started the KeaTerm term  try using the windows hyperterminal and see
if the problem occurs again .I think it should not

Regards

""evans jason""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> recently i plugged a laptop using KeaTerm term em software into the
console
> port of a 2924 switch and it immediately rebooted the switch. i repeated
the
> operation a 2nd time making sure i didn't have a reload command in the
> waiting and it happened again. has this every happened to anyone? if so,
any
> ideas on how to not let it happen again - this switch is a production
switch
> w/ all the NT servers.
>
> thanks,
>
> jason




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13492&t=13478
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Routing problem. PLS help -- Urgent [7:13474]

2001-07-24 Thread Dave W.

That's alright, as my real network has some 20.1.1.0 subnets attached to 
R1750(L) and hence R1750(R) should forward all packets to R1750(L) if 
packets are destinated to any 20.1.1.0 subnets.

Any other suggestions to my question, pls?

David


Original Message Follows
From: "Arun" 
Reply-To: "Arun" 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Routing problem. PLS help -- Urgent [7:13474]
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 05:26:45 -0400

Hi
20.1.1.0/30
  10.4.1.0/30
  20.1.1.0/24
check above the subnet mask .do see anything there.

regards
""Dave W.""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 > Hi there,
 >
 > I have the following config:
 >
 > R1750(L) --- R7206 -- R1750(R)
 >
 > R1750(L):
 > Serial 0: 20.1.1.1/30
 >
 > R7206:
 > Serial 0: 20.1.1.2/30
 > Serial 1: some IP
 > Tunnel 1: 10.4.1.2/30 over the serial link 1
 >
 > R1750(R):
 > Tunnel 1: 10.4.1.2/30 over the serial link 0
 > Serial 0: some IP
 >
 > At the left-hand side R1750, the routing table is:
 > 0.0.0.0 20.1.1.2
 > At the R7206, the routing table is:
 > 20.1.1.0/30 known via connected
 > 10.4.1.0/30 known via connected
 > At the right-hand side R1750, the routing table is:
 > 20.1.1.0/24 known via static, directly connected, via Tunnel 0
 >
 > My problem is that at the righ-hand side R1750, I am not able to ping
 > 20.1.1.1 and vice verse.
 >
 > Can someone pls suggest me if there is any fault that causes the problem.
 > Your help is really appreciated.
 >
 > Regards,
 > David

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13493&t=13474
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT : 3COM 227 router [7:13449]

2001-07-24 Thread Provost, Robert

some basic 3Com router commands:

show
add
setd
del

sh -ip route
sh -port config
sh -path config
setd !1 -ip net=10.1.1.1 255.0.0.0.0 (set lan address)
setd !X -ip net=172.168.1.1 255.255.0.0 (set wan address) (X = port number)
add -ip route 0.0.0.0 172.168.1.2 1 (static route)
sh layout (graphical router layout w/ports)
sh -ip net 
sh -rip conf
sh -ospf conf
sh -sys conf

just put a question mark after any command get the parameters.  

Rob Provost

-Original Message-
From: Charles Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT : 3COM 227 router [7:13449]


Hi all,

I need to configure 3com 227 router.  Reference manual is not available on 
3com web site. Can anyone point me the link how to get those ? or any expert

can highlight some of the commands to me ?

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13494&t=13449
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread Fred Danson

I find it very hard to believe that, in the United States, there are only 
1.4826 CCDPs for every CCIE. I would imagine that there would be atleast 10 
CCDPs per CCIE.


>From: "Christopher Supino" 
>Reply-To: "Christopher Supino" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
>Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 07:16:28 -0400
>
>Interesting. What is the source of this info?
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>cheekin
>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:33 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
>
>
>FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001
>
>  US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
>CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135  267
>CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
>CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
>CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
>CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245
>
>cheekin
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13495&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Kiran Kumar M

Hai,

I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to
locate the solution.

Thanks in advance,
Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13497&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread Paul Holloway

Again, please give the source of this info. Thanks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Fred Danson
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Certification Statistics [7:13477]


I find it very hard to believe that, in the United States, there are only
1.4826 CCDPs for every CCIE. I would imagine that there would be atleast 10
CCDPs per CCIE.


>From: "Christopher Supino"
>Reply-To: "Christopher Supino"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
>Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 07:16:28 -0400
>
>Interesting. What is the source of this info?
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>cheekin
>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:33 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
>
>
>FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001
>
>  US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
>CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135  267
>CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
>CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
>CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
>CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245
>
>cheekin
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13500&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



AUI TO 10BASE T MUST SELL [7:13496]

2001-07-24 Thread PHIMHONGKONG

5 AUI TO 10BASE T MUST SELL

$10 each  or 5 is $50 + 5 forshipping


USE FOR YOUR ROUTER 25xx OR any AUI port

i accept paypal

THanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13496&t=13496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: what is IGP, what is IBGP [7:13484]

2001-07-24 Thread NIGEC Spar Enginers

>From my own knowledge, IGP means Interior Gateway Protocol eg. RIPv1 and
v2,IGRP, EIGRP and OSPF.

While IBGP means Interior Border Gateway Protocol which is type of BGP(The
key to BGP protocol lies in its ability to connect to Interior Gateway
Protocols (IGPs) such as EIGRP and OSPF).
IBGP is an example of EGP(Exterior Gateway Protocol)

Kareem.
CCNA, MCP.
> -Original Message-
> From: xie rootstock [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 1:44 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  what is IGP, what is IBGP [7:13484]
> 
> it is confusing me very much, please help me, thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13501&t=13484
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Farhan Ahmed

lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a 64k
connection to internet
> what would be the speed of the tunnel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13499&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread Dennis H

Once again, what is the source of this info?  Cisco only publishes stats for
CCIE's so it's not them.



""cheekin""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The numbers are the total number of engineers certified up to May this
year.
>
> EMEA stands for Europe, Middle East, Africa.
>
> cheekin
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To: "cheekin"
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 18:14
> Subject: Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
>
>
> >
> > Very interesting figures . Also the figures given indicates upto May or
in
> > MAy alone?What is EMEA?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "cheekin"
> >  home.net>cc:
> > Sent by: Subject: Certification
> Statistics [7:13477]
> > nobody@groups
> > tudy.com
> >
> >
> > 07/24/2001
> > 03:02 PM
> > Please
> > respond to
> > "cheekin"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001
> >
> >  US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
> > CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135  267
> > CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
> > CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
> > CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
> > CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245
> >
> > cheekin




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13502&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CAR CONFIG EXAMBLE [7:13503]

2001-07-24 Thread Michael D.

Hey Folks,

could somebody show me a Comminted Access Rate Examble ?
How does it work in real life ?

best regards
Michael




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13503&t=13503
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Configuration Example for 2610 and 16AM WIC [7:13504]

2001-07-24 Thread Mask of Idiot

I am looking for a configuration example utilizing at 2610 and a 16AM
(Analog Modem) WIC used for a RAS server.

Thank you in advance for your help.

MOI




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13504&t=13504
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Patrick Ramsey

sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610.

The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is
plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway".  Then
you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway.  (or at least
specify a specific route to the other vlans)

If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to
keep the default gw out it's serial interface.

-Patrick


>>> "Kiran Kumar M"  07/24/01 10:27AM >>>
Hai,

I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to
locate the solution.

Thanks in advance,
Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13505&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread John Hardman

Hi

Likely this is from a Cisco Academy instructor. An instructor posted the
same format of information about this time last year. From what the
instructor said Cisco gives them the information from time to time.

$0.02
--
John Hardman CCNP MCSE


""Dennis H""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Once again, what is the source of this info?  Cisco only publishes stats
for
> CCIE's so it's not them.
>
>
>
> ""cheekin""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > The numbers are the total number of engineers certified up to May this
> year.
> >
> > EMEA stands for Europe, Middle East, Africa.
> >
> > cheekin
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From:
> > To: "cheekin"
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 18:14
> > Subject: Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Very interesting figures . Also the figures given indicates upto May
or
> in
> > > MAy alone?What is EMEA?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "cheekin"
> > >  home.net>cc:
> > > Sent by: Subject: Certification
> > Statistics [7:13477]
> > > nobody@groups
> > > tudy.com
> > >
> > >
> > > 07/24/2001
> > > 03:02 PM
> > > Please
> > > respond to
> > > "cheekin"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001
> > >
> > >  US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
> > > CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135
267
> > > CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
> > > CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
> > > CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
> > > CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245
> > >
> > > cheekin




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13508&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread Mask of Idiot

Looks like the "kids" are out for the summer.

MOI

""Dennis H""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Once again, what is the source of this info?  Cisco only publishes stats
for
> CCIE's so it's not them.
>
>
>
> ""cheekin""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > The numbers are the total number of engineers certified up to May this
> year.
> >
> > EMEA stands for Europe, Middle East, Africa.
> >
> > cheekin
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From:
> > To: "cheekin"
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 18:14
> > Subject: Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Very interesting figures . Also the figures given indicates upto May
or
> in
> > > MAy alone?What is EMEA?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "cheekin"
> > >  home.net>cc:
> > > Sent by: Subject: Certification
> > Statistics [7:13477]
> > > nobody@groups
> > > tudy.com
> > >
> > >
> > > 07/24/2001
> > > 03:02 PM
> > > Please
> > > respond to
> > > "cheekin"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001
> > >
> > >  US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
> > > CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135
267
> > > CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
> > > CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
> > > CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
> > > CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245
> > >
> > > cheekin




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13506&t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Allen May

I could be off here...but I believe the accelerator card only helps the cpu
intense part of encrypting/decrypting traffic.  You would still be limited
to internet speed which involves amount of traffic between endpoints, etc.
Maximum would be 128K unless you have alot of traffic going through that can
be compressed.  In that case that traffic can go faster than 128K but most
files that can be compressed on the fly with noticable difference are
uncompressed files such as .bmp, .txt, comma delimited files, etc.

Allen

- Original Message -
From: "Farhan Ahmed" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]


> lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a
64k
> connection to internet
> > what would be the speed of the tunnel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13507&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread John Neiberger

I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem.  However, one
thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a
2610 router.  According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast
ethernet module available for the 2610.  Unless they've come out with
something new, this may be your problem.  I'm guessing that you have
your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do
10Mbps.  

In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610,
that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port.  Those do not support
ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently.

If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.

Regards,
John

>>> "Kiran Kumar M"  7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>>
Hai,

I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular
VLAN,
and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable
to
locate the solution.

Thanks in advance,
Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13509&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Allen May

He said both had 64K connection to the internet.  And on my ISDN I have 128K
but about 20-30% of the time I get more than that with data compression.
Try downloading a really big .bmp file sometime & watch 56K download at like
100K...rofl.  It works ;)

- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Ramsey" 
To: ; 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499]


> I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right
about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the
throughput will only be 64k.  Regardless of compression/and or vpn
acceleration.
>
> -Patrick
>
> >>> "Allen May"  07/24/01 11:02AM >>>
> I could be off here...but I believe the accelerator card only helps the
cpu
> intense part of encrypting/decrypting traffic.  You would still be limited
> to internet speed which involves amount of traffic between endpoints, etc.
> Maximum would be 128K unless you have alot of traffic going through that
can
> be compressed.  In that case that traffic can go faster than 128K but most
> files that can be compressed on the fly with noticable difference are
> uncompressed files such as .bmp, .txt, comma delimited files, etc.
>
> Allen
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Farhan Ahmed"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM
> Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]
>
>
> > lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a
> 64k
> > connection to internet
> > > what would be the speed of the tunnel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13511&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Patrick Ramsey

I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right
about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the
throughput will only be 64k.  Regardless of compression/and or vpn
acceleration.

-Patrick

>>> "Allen May"  07/24/01 11:02AM >>>
I could be off here...but I believe the accelerator card only helps the cpu
intense part of encrypting/decrypting traffic.  You would still be limited
to internet speed which involves amount of traffic between endpoints, etc.
Maximum would be 128K unless you have alot of traffic going through that can
be compressed.  In that case that traffic can go faster than 128K but most
files that can be compressed on the fly with noticable difference are
uncompressed files such as .bmp, .txt, comma delimited files, etc.

Allen

- Original Message -
From: "Farhan Ahmed" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]


> lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a
64k
> connection to internet
> > what would be the speed of the tunnel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13510&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]

2001-07-24 Thread Paul Timmerman

(had to ask again)  I have a PA-T3 about 25 feet away from OC3 (Ameritech).
The Cisco documentation is very unclear on whether I can you a non-Cisco
cable for this.  The Cisco cable is only 10 feet long, so I can't get it
from the demarc into the server room.  DS3 documenation says that I can go
upto 400 feet or so, but it all depends on the CSU/DSU.  So my question is
whether or not I can have a coax cable made up (50 feet), and if I did that,
what kind of problems might I run into.

> Thanks in advance,
> 
> paul timmerman




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13512&t=13512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]

2001-07-24 Thread Rajeev Karamchand

All

Is there a way to block all unused external IP 




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13514&t=13514
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



How to configure RSRB on cisco routers [7:13513]

2001-07-24 Thread Clotaire Anicet

Hi!
I need some help on how to configure properly RSRB on 3 Cisco
routers.
Please, have a look at the attached diagram.
What commands should be configured on each router?

Thanks & regards.
Page-1



Page 1 of 1

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of clotaire.anicet.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13513&t=13513
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

Guys, 261x series routers do NOT have fast ethernet, NOR will they accept
ANY network module w/ a FE interface.
neither will 262x routers, whic have 1 or two FE interfaces built in.
the same goes for 265x. one or two built in, but it it not possible to add
more.


i am assuming from your description that there is another router in your
network on that switch.

if this is a true L3 switch, than your 2610 is NOT capable of being an MLS
RP and there must be another one on the network somewhere.

your routers eth. interface will plug into a single VLAN, with an IP route
either static or dynamic to those other VLANs via a next hop, the MLS RP on
your layer three switch.

this is quite fundamental. is there an entry for the network you are trying
to reach in your routing table.

I'm goign to take a wild guess here and assume that there is not yet.

tell us what kind of "L3 switch" you are using i need to know what equipment
you have, exactly, in this case, in order to help you.

i do not think that this is a default route probllem at all.

he is not supposed to be trunking to the switch, he should in this case have
a next hop on the VLAN that is connected to other VLANS, if this is a L3
switching scenario.

I also think that what he thinks is a layer 3 switch is not capable of
acting as one, or is not configured correctly.

Kiran, tell us what equipment you have, and what network connections you
have.

-Peter

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]


sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610.

The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is
plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway".  Then
you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway.  (or at least
specify a specific route to the other vlans)

If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to
keep the default gw out it's serial interface.

-Patrick


>>> "Kiran Kumar M"  07/24/01 10:27AM >>>
Hai,

I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to
locate the solution.

Thanks in advance,
Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13515&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Ciscco IDS [7:13516]

2001-07-24 Thread Farhan Ahmed

how its possible for ids to read the contents of packet for eg
"confidential doc" and generate an alaram

what if somebody using vpn from inside network to somewhere else to transfer
confidential information

what does it means that ipsec is ,,,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13516&t=13516
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Just passed 640-503 [7:13485]

2001-07-24 Thread Preston Kilburn

Hey man, congradulations on that.
-P.Kil


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13517&t=13485
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Chuck Larrieu

the line speed is ALWAYS 64K

yes you can use compression, and the net result end to end of user data MAY
be higher. but the line itself can only transmit 64kbps

subtle difference. some data formats lend themselves well to compression.
gifs and jpegs and text, for example. I have seen pdf reduce word docs by as
much as 90% zipping files can result in compression of anywhere from 50-80%
depending on the source. on the other hand, it is possible for compression
to increase the size of the data file.

but in all cases, your 64K data link can not transmit more than 64K bits per
second.

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Farhan Ahmed
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]


lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a 64k
connection to internet
> what would be the speed of the tunnel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13518&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]

2001-07-24 Thread Schneider, Matt

yes


-Original Message-
From: Rajeev Karamchand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]


All

Is there a way to block all unused external IP 




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13521&t=13514
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CAR CONFIG EXAMBLE [7:13503]

2001-07-24 Thread Tony Medeiros

Here is how CAR works:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/car/

And here is how to configure it:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c
/qcpart1/qccar.htm

(watch the word wrap)

Tony M.
#6172

- Original Message -
From: Michael D. 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:46 AM
Subject: CAR CONFIG EXAMBLE [7:13503]


> Hey Folks,
>
> could somebody show me a Comminted Access Rate Examble ?
> How does it work in real life ?
>
> best regards
> Michael




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13519&t=13503
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VLAN routing [7:13465]

2001-07-24 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Why does the network on the other side of the routers need to be in the 
same VLAN? Why don't you make it a different VLAN and a different IP subnet?

A VLAN is an IP subnet. Sure, Cisco and other vendors make it sound like 
VLANs are something more mysterious, but essentially, a VLAN is an IP subnet.

So you need routing on those routers.

But what you have described is a discontiguous subnet. This is usually not 
a good idea but it could work if you use static routes or a classless 
routing protocol and tinker with the prefix boundary.

But, it's probably a better idea to use a different design where the subnet 
is not separated by multiple routers. A subnet (VLAN) separated by switches 
is OK, but a subnet separated by routers is usually avoided. You could use 
bridging on the routers, but seems like even more of a kludge.

If I'm missing something, please let me know. Thanks.

Priscilla

At 03:35 AM 7/24/01, SolutionFinder SolutionFinder wrote:
>Hello colleagues, I have a question regarding the configuration of the
>routing device when a VLAN is separated by two or more routers. Do I have
>to add an interface for the respective VLAN on every router ?  Vlan 20
>--> Router A --> Router B --> Router C --> Vlan 20 Do all three routers
>need the 'interface VLAN 20' statement in their configurations ? Thanks
>for your help in advance. Regards, Hans
>
>
>
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13524&t=13465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]

2001-07-24 Thread fgh

You can configure an access list to permit the ip's you want and there is an
implicit deny at the end of the access list. For example to permit 10.1.1.1
and deny everybody else: (make sure to apply the access list to an
interface)
access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.255


- Original Message -
From: Rajeev Karamchand 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]


> All
>
> Is there a way to block all unused external IP
>
>
>
>
> =
> Rajeev Karamchand
> MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13523&t=13514
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: RSM Problems [7:13022]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

still need help?

-Original Message-
From: Richard Tufaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RSM Problems [7:13022]


Hey im having a problem with my RSM here are the messages anyone got a clue?


Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms
CR-RSM#
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978


CR-RSM#show logging
Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 flushes, 0 overruns)
Console logging: level debugging, 424 messages logged
Monitor logging: level debugging, 16 messages logged
Logging to: vty2(4)
Buffer logging: level informational, 424 messages logged
Trap logging: level informational, 1018 message lines logged
Logging to 10.1.1.71, 914 message lines logged
  
Log Buffer (4096 bytes):
 6021098C 60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignme

RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]

2001-07-24 Thread Chuck Larrieu

interesting. the CCO links I checked verify what you say.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/cable/cab_rout/cfig_nts/4721
st3/4721over.htm#xtocid127645
watch the wrap

I find it interesting that Cisco flat out states you can't get the cable
from outside vendors. I would think 75 ohm coax with the appropriate BNC
connector would be available from any reputable cable vendor. you may want
to phone around.

I also find it ambiguous when Cisco says that "The Cisco PA-T3 75-ohm
coaxial cable (see Figure 1-5) is available only in 10-foot (3.05-meter)
lengths. Line build-out is programmable for up to 450 feet of 734A or
equivalent coaxial cable or up to 225 for 728A or equivalent coaxial cable."

I read that to mean that you have alternatives to the Cisco provided cable.
calls to cable vendors might help clarify this.

you may want to call Cisco tac and ask for clarification.

BTW, I have customers with PA-T3 cards further than 10 feet from the telco
drop. I don't recall what they did for cable.

Chuck



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Timmerman
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]


(had to ask again)  I have a PA-T3 about 25 feet away from OC3 (Ameritech).
The Cisco documentation is very unclear on whether I can you a non-Cisco
cable for this.  The Cisco cable is only 10 feet long, so I can't get it
from the demarc into the server room.  DS3 documenation says that I can go
upto 400 feet or so, but it all depends on the CSU/DSU.  So my question is
whether or not I can have a coax cable made up (50 feet), and if I did that,
what kind of problems might I run into.

> Thanks in advance,
>
> paul timmerman




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13525&t=13512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

correct me if im wrong, but encryption and compression are COMPLETELY
different, and in most cases, encryption results in LARGER payloads.

/me hangs his head in dissapointment

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499]


I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right
about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the
throughput will only be 64k.  Regardless of compression/and or vpn
acceleration.

-Patrick

>>> "Allen May"  07/24/01 11:02AM >>>
I could be off here...but I believe the accelerator card only helps the cpu
intense part of encrypting/decrypting traffic.  You would still be limited
to internet speed which involves amount of traffic between endpoints, etc.
Maximum would be 128K unless you have alot of traffic going through that can
be compressed.  In that case that traffic can go faster than 128K but most
files that can be compressed on the fly with noticable difference are
uncompressed files such as .bmp, .txt, comma delimited files, etc.

Allen

- Original Message -
From: "Farhan Ahmed" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]


> lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a
64k
> connection to internet
> > what would be the speed of the tunnel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13526&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Patrick Ramsey

Most definately and across 64k, damn near struggling...  I can only hope
the vpn is used for telnet... :)

>>> Peter Slow  07/24/01 11:53AM >>>
correct me if im wrong, but encryption and compression are COMPLETELY
different, and in most cases, encryption results in LARGER payloads.

/me hangs his head in dissapointment

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499]


I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right
about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the
throughput will only be 64k.  Regardless of compression/and or vpn
acceleration.

-Patrick

>>> "Allen May"  07/24/01 11:02AM >>>
I could be off here...but I believe the accelerator card only helps the cpu
intense part of encrypting/decrypting traffic.  You would still be limited
to internet speed which involves amount of traffic between endpoints, etc.
Maximum would be 128K unless you have alot of traffic going through that can
be compressed.  In that case that traffic can go faster than 128K but most
files that can be compressed on the fly with noticable difference are
uncompressed files such as .bmp, .txt, comma delimited files, etc.

Allen

- Original Message -
From: "Farhan Ahmed" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]


> lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a
64k
> connection to internet
> > what would be the speed of the tunnel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13528&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

OH MY GOD.
im still hanging my head from the last email i replied to, and this email
makes me wanna go into the corner and cry.

>(had to ask again)  I have a PA-T3 about 25 feet away from OC3 

yeah. lets see how well those singlemode SC connectors fit into your coax
receptacles.

(Ameritech).
The Cisco documentation is very unclear on whether I can you a non-Cisco
cable for this.  The Cisco cable is only 10 feet long, so I can't get it

this is because they dont make them.

from the demarc into the server room.  DS3 documenation says that I can go
upto 400 feet or so, but it all depends on the CSU/DSU.  So my question is

PA-T3 doesnt need a CSU/DSU.
HSSI adaptors need CSU/DSUs.

whether or not I can have a coax cable made up (50 feet), and if I did that,
what kind of problems might I run into.

Uhh. Please tell me that the OC3 thing was a typo.  Not that i'll beleive
you, but i might not be ashamed to post in the future.

think about it.

can i plug a t1 into a phone jack? can i plug a ds3 into a t1? can i plug an
oc3 into a ds3?

-Peter

> Thanks in advance,
> 
> paul timmerman

PS. I REALLY hope that was a typo.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13527&t=13512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RE: RSM Problems [7:13022]

2001-07-24 Thread Richard Tufaro

na, but thanks. Result = BAD RSM! Replaced the RSM and everything was cool.
Still waiting for the Cisco diags, ill give you guys more info when i get
them back. Thanks Slow,

>>> Peter Slow  07/24 11:47 AM >>>
still need help?

-Original Message-
From: Richard Tufaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RSM Problems [7:13022]


Hey im having a problem with my RSM here are the messages anyone got a clue?


Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms
CR-RSM#
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978


CR-RSM#show logging
Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 flushes, 0 overruns)
Console logging: level debugging, 424 messages logged
Monitor logging: level debugging, 16 messages logged
Logging to: vty2(4)
Buffer logging: level informational, 424 messages logged
Trap logging: level informational, 1018 message lines logged
Logging to 10.1.1.71, 914 message lines logged
  
Log Buffer (4096 bytes):
 6021098C 60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= "Per-minute J

RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]

2001-07-24 Thread Steve Smith

I hooked my ATM DS-3 up with coax I had made from Anixter. It's about
35'. I have had zero problems out of it. Just buy some.

regards,

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]


interesting. the CCO links I checked verify what you say.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/cable/cab_rout/cfig_nts/
4721
st3/4721over.htm#xtocid127645
watch the wrap

I find it interesting that Cisco flat out states you can't get the cable
from outside vendors. I would think 75 ohm coax with the appropriate BNC
connector would be available from any reputable cable vendor. you may
want
to phone around.

I also find it ambiguous when Cisco says that "The Cisco PA-T3 75-ohm
coaxial cable (see Figure 1-5) is available only in 10-foot (3.05-meter)
lengths. Line build-out is programmable for up to 450 feet of 734A or
equivalent coaxial cable or up to 225 for 728A or equivalent coaxial
cable."

I read that to mean that you have alternatives to the Cisco provided
cable.
calls to cable vendors might help clarify this.

you may want to call Cisco tac and ask for clarification.

BTW, I have customers with PA-T3 cards further than 10 feet from the
telco
drop. I don't recall what they did for cable.

Chuck



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Timmerman
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]


(had to ask again)  I have a PA-T3 about 25 feet away from OC3
(Ameritech).
The Cisco documentation is very unclear on whether I can you a non-Cisco
cable for this.  The Cisco cable is only 10 feet long, so I can't get it
from the demarc into the server room.  DS3 documenation says that I can
go
upto 400 feet or so, but it all depends on the CSU/DSU.  So my question
is
whether or not I can have a coax cable made up (50 feet), and if I did
that,
what kind of problems might I run into.

> Thanks in advance,
>
> paul timmerman




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13530&t=13512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Ayers, Michael

This is correct, VPN, depending on what features are implemented, can add
significant size to packets.  Cisco sets the default Payload size for IPSec
on the PIX to 1380 to make up for the fact that there can be IPSec headers
close to 120 bytes. 


 -Original Message-
From:   Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

correct me if im wrong, but encryption and compression are COMPLETELY
different, and in most cases, encryption results in LARGER payloads.

/me hangs his head in dissapointment

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499]


I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right
about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the
throughput will only be 64k.  Regardless of compression/and or vpn
acceleration.

-Patrick

>>> "Allen May"  07/24/01 11:02AM >>>
I could be off here...but I believe the accelerator card only helps the cpu
intense part of encrypting/decrypting traffic.  You would still be limited
to internet speed which involves amount of traffic between endpoints, etc.
Maximum would be 128K unless you have alot of traffic going through that can
be compressed.  In that case that traffic can go faster than 128K but most
files that can be compressed on the fly with noticable difference are
uncompressed files such as .bmp, .txt, comma delimited files, etc.

Allen

- Original Message -
From: "Farhan Ahmed" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]


> lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a
64k
> connection to internet
> > what would be the speed of the tunnel
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto.  Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the
official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by it.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13531&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

I'd like to find out what the chipset on the two routers is.

to the best of my knowledge, the 1751 is a 1750 chassis.

can anyone get a show interfaces fas0 on each router?


-Original Message-
From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]


no. the 1750's do not support isl.

The new 1751's do not support isl either, but they do support dot1q.




Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice
Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld

704-943-3615 - Phone
704-943-3660 - Fax
877-6-iReady - Helpdesk



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ahmed Mamoor Amimi
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]


Can any one tell me if we can run the command "encapsulation ISL" on
ethernet port of 1750 router .

-Mamoor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13534&t=12024
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

type-o type-o type-o type-o
pleeease.
say type-o
and i dont mean blood type.
=P
-Pietro

-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]


OH MY GOD.
im still hanging my head from the last email i replied to, and this email
makes me wanna go into the corner and cry.

>(had to ask again)  I have a PA-T3 about 25 feet away from OC3 

yeah. lets see how well those singlemode SC connectors fit into your coax
receptacles.

(Ameritech).
The Cisco documentation is very unclear on whether I can you a non-Cisco
cable for this.  The Cisco cable is only 10 feet long, so I can't get it

this is because they dont make them.

from the demarc into the server room.  DS3 documenation says that I can go
upto 400 feet or so, but it all depends on the CSU/DSU.  So my question is

PA-T3 doesnt need a CSU/DSU.
HSSI adaptors need CSU/DSUs.

whether or not I can have a coax cable made up (50 feet), and if I did that,
what kind of problems might I run into.

Uhh. Please tell me that the OC3 thing was a typo.  Not that i'll beleive
you, but i might not be ashamed to post in the future.

think about it.

can i plug a t1 into a phone jack? can i plug a ds3 into a t1? can i plug an
oc3 into a ds3?

-Peter

> Thanks in advance,
> 
> paul timmerman

PS. I REALLY hope that was a typo.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13533&t=13512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Ayers, Michael

I have VPN running over 56k dialup, and it performs rather well.  It's not
the fastest, but it is functional.  My users say it's about as fast as
dialing in /w/ 28000 RAS



 -Original Message-
From:   Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

Most definately and across 64k, damn near struggling...  I can only hope
the vpn is used for telnet... :)

>>> Peter Slow  07/24/01 11:53AM >>>
correct me if im wrong, but encryption and compression are COMPLETELY
different, and in most cases, encryption results in LARGER payloads.

/me hangs his head in dissapointment

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499]


I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right
about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the
throughput will only be 64k.  Regardless of compression/and or vpn
acceleration.

-Patrick

>>> "Allen May"  07/24/01 11:02AM >>>
I could be off here...but I believe the accelerator card only helps the cpu
intense part of encrypting/decrypting traffic.  You would still be limited
to internet speed which involves amount of traffic between endpoints, etc.
Maximum would be 128K unless you have alot of traffic going through that can
be compressed.  In that case that traffic can go faster than 128K but most
files that can be compressed on the fly with noticable difference are
uncompressed files such as .bmp, .txt, comma delimited files, etc.

Allen

- Original Message -
From: "Farhan Ahmed" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]


> lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a
64k
> connection to internet
> > what would be the speed of the tunnel
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto.  Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the
official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by it.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13532&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

what?
huh?
say this again?



-Original Message-
From: Rajeev Karamchand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]


All

Is there a way to block all unused external IP 




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13535&t=13514
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]

2001-07-24 Thread Patrick Ramsey

I can only assume this has somethign to do with a network of ip's assigned
by an isp to you as a customer? (Rajeev)

Maybe you do not wish to allow access through your firewall to those ip
addresses you don't have assigned to servers?

Or maybe you don't have a firewall and your servers are hanging on directly
behind your router? in which case, let me point you to
http://www.securityfocus.com

Or are you talking about an internal network that you would like to isolate
at the switch level which ip's can talk and which can not?  (If this is the
case, the you can't do it by ip, but you can do this my mac)  Would the goal
be to not allow any 'unknowns' on your local lan?

You specificity is somewhat lacking.

-Patrick

>>> "Peter Slow"  07/24/01 12:39PM >>>
what?
huh?
say this again?



-Original Message-
From: Rajeev Karamchand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]


All

Is there a way to block all unused external IP 




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13537&t=13514
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: RSM Problems [7:13022]

2001-07-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

do you have the right amount of memory? and have you 
checked for a IOS bug? and what IOS is it?
> still need help?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Tufaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RSM Problems [7:13022]
> 
> 
> Hey im having a problem with my RSM here are the messages anyone got a
clue?
> 
> 
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms
> CR-RSM#
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 
> 
> CR-RSM#show logging
> Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 flushes, 0 overruns)
> Console logging: level debugging, 424 messages logged
> Monitor logging: level debugging, 16 messages logged
> Logging to: vty2(4)
> Buffer logging: level informational, 424 messages logged
> Trap logging: level informational, 1018 message lines logged
> Logging to 10.1.1.71, 914 message lines logged
>   
> Log Buffer (4096 bytes):
>  6021098C 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
> 0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
> -Process= "Per-minute Jobs", ipl= 6, pid= 64
> -Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
> 60210978
> 27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory 

Re: BayTech Remote Power Supply [7:13048]

2001-07-24 Thread William

IBM server also seems have a RPS.
"Circusnuts"  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Has anyone configured one of these ???
>
> Thanks
> Phil




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13538&t=13048
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



IP Helper Address [7:13539]

2001-07-24 Thread Jason Kinney

I have heard this term "IP helper address" used to reference a default
gateway.  Is an IP helper address the same as a default gateway?  If not
what is an IP helper address?  Do you know where the term came from?

Jason Kinney
925-961-0223




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13539&t=13539
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pls sovle My problem [7:13480]

2001-07-24 Thread Monty O'Brien

You need to assign the correct NTFS permissions at the folder level. From
the security tab of the share(client 1) assign the group who has permissions
to list folder contents.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13541&t=13480
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking the unused IP [7:13514]

2001-07-24 Thread Hire, Ejay

Yes.

Assuming you have a block of 8 ip's from your provider (10.0.0.0/29), and
you are using .0 for the network, .1 for the router, and .2 for the
firewall, you could block the rest quite easily by:

ip route 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.255 null0
ip route 10.0.0.4 255.255.255.252 null0

Null0 routes are less processor intensive than access lists, and do not
generate an ICMP Administratively prohibited message.

-EJ

-Original Message-
From: Rajeev Karamchand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]


All

Is there a way to block all unused external IP 




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13542&t=13514
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Need help troubleshooting home connectivity [7:13540]

2001-07-24 Thread J. Li

Sorry to bother you all.  I lost Internet connectivity
at home.  I need this fixed so that I can download and
practice BOSON test before my scheduled BSMSN exam on
Monday.  

I had "redundant links" configured at home: 

1. Using Sprint Broadband Wireless as my primary
connection
2. Using AT&T Global Dialer as my backup - use it
maybe once every two months.
(OS: Windows 2000 Professional)

But both of them stopped working.  Here is what
happened.  When everything was working (slowly), I
tried to speed it up.  I uninstalled TCP/IP protocol
and reinstalled it.  This is all I did.  After
reinstalling TCP/IP, my Sprint Broadband stopped
working.  Here are the symptoms:

1. I can ping Internet IP addresses but HTTP by IP
address does not work (so not an DNS issue)
2. HTTP by IP not working with Netscape error message
"Netscape was unable to create a network socket
connection.  There may be insufficient system
resources or the network may be down."
3. FTP does not work with error message "Can't create
socket - no winsock present."

I then tried AT&T Global Dialer.  It gets connected
but can't get authenticated saying "waiting for
authentication."

Sprint checked my cable modem.  They said it's a
workstation issue - not a network problem.  Sounds
familiar?

I called my company helpdesk for workstation support. 
He suggested deleting AT&T Global dialer icon and
rebooting PC.  He also said Uninstalling TCP/IP on
Windows 2000 is very troublesome.  I may have to
reinstall Windows 2000 to fix the problem.  He doesn't
know any other way to fix "winsock" issue on Windows
2000.

I believe it's a workstation issue: corrupted or
missing files.  But I don't know how to fix it.   The
workstation and all other applications are working
fine.  Any suggestions/ideas would be greatly
appreciated.

J.  Li



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13540&t=13540
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VLAN routing [7:13465]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Van Oene

I beg to differ slightly on the concept of VLANS.  A VLAN, as I'm sure you
know, is a broadcast domain and makes no assumption of nor has any
dependance upon layer three protocols.  However, the difference in answers
between how to extend a protocol independent broadcast domain vs an IP
broadcast domain over an IP network are subtle and likely moot in this case.

The design choices that could enable this technically challenged network
would include, as you point out, subneting the IP network such that the
single subnet becomes two and enabling routing over the IP intermediary
network, or, bridging the subnet across the IP network using a tunneling
technique in which case the intermediary network becomes transparent to the
subnet.  The first case is likely the most plausible, though the original
poster has not indicated that it is indeed IP that needs the services of
this bridged network.

I think the original poster needs to ask him or her self Howard's cardinal
question "What problem am I trying to solve?"  likely yielding a need to
redesign toward a more simple, and functional design as you suggest :)

Pete


*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 7/24/2001 at 12:05 PM Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:

>Why does the network on the other side of the routers need to be in the 
>same VLAN? Why don't you make it a different VLAN and a different IP
>subnet?
>
>A VLAN is an IP subnet. Sure, Cisco and other vendors make it sound like 
>VLANs are something more mysterious, but essentially, a VLAN is an IP
>subnet.
>
>So you need routing on those routers.
>
>But what you have described is a discontiguous subnet. This is usually not 
>a good idea but it could work if you use static routes or a classless 
>routing protocol and tinker with the prefix boundary.
>
>But, it's probably a better idea to use a different design where the
>subnet 
>is not separated by multiple routers. A subnet (VLAN) separated by
>switches 
>is OK, but a subnet separated by routers is usually avoided. You could use 
>bridging on the routers, but seems like even more of a kludge.
>
>If I'm missing something, please let me know. Thanks.
>
>Priscilla
>
>At 03:35 AM 7/24/01, SolutionFinder SolutionFinder wrote:
>>Hello colleagues, I have a question regarding the configuration of the
>>routing device when a VLAN is separated by two or more routers. Do I have
>>to add an interface for the respective VLAN on every router ?  Vlan 20
>>--> Router A --> Router B --> Router C --> Vlan 20 Do all three routers
>>need the 'interface VLAN 20' statement in their configurations ? Thanks
>>for your help in advance. Regards, Hans
>>
>>
>>
>>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13543&t=13465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE Expertises [7:13545]

2001-07-24 Thread Leonardo Borda

Does anyone know how many CCIE exist around the world?
Does cisco publish that information?

Leonardo Borda




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13545&t=13545
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VLAN routing [7:13465]

2001-07-24 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>Why does the network on the other side of the routers need to be in the
>same VLAN? Why don't you make it a different VLAN and a different IP subnet?
>
>A VLAN is an IP subnet. Sure, Cisco and other vendors make it sound like
>VLANs are something more mysterious, but essentially, a VLAN is an IP
subnet.


Heretic!

VLANs and switches good.Four legs good
Subnets and routers bad.Two legs bad
ALl topologies are equal, but   All animals are equal, but
  some are more equal than others.some are more equal tan others.

>
>So you need routing on those routers.
>
>But what you have described is a discontiguous subnet. This is usually not
>a good idea but it could work if you use static routes or a classless
>routing protocol and tinker with the prefix boundary.
>
>But, it's probably a better idea to use a different design where the subnet
>is not separated by multiple routers. A subnet (VLAN) separated by switches
>is OK, but a subnet separated by routers is usually avoided. You could use
>bridging on the routers, but seems like even more of a kludge.
>
>If I'm missing something, please let me know. Thanks.
>
>Priscilla
>
>At 03:35 AM 7/24/01, SolutionFinder SolutionFinder wrote:
>>Hello colleagues, I have a question regarding the configuration of the
>>routing device when a VLAN is separated by two or more routers. Do I have
>>to add an interface for the respective VLAN on every router ?  Vlan 20
>>--> Router A --> Router B --> Router C --> Vlan 20 Do all three routers
>>need the 'interface VLAN 20' statement in their configurations ? Thanks
>  >for your help in advance. Regards, Hans


More seriously, what is the problem you are trying to solve?  What is 
the basis of allocation to a VLAN? Would a group -- even a supernet 
-- of subnets solve the problem?  Or is this something where L2 VLAN 
switches are more appropriate than routers?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13546&t=13465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCM with 6509 [7:13549]

2001-07-24 Thread khramov

Is anyone using CCM software?  If yes did you have to config anything
special on 6509 and 2980G sw in order for CCM to work.
Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13549&t=13549
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Need help troubleshooting home connectivity [7:13540]

2001-07-24 Thread Ayers, Michael

I think you should reload the IP stack one more time.  Sounds like a binding
issue.   Un-install, reboot, and then re-install.


 -Original Message-
From:   J. Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:OT: Need help troubleshooting home connectivity [7:13540]

Sorry to bother you all.  I lost Internet connectivity
at home.  I need this fixed so that I can download and
practice BOSON test before my scheduled BSMSN exam on
Monday.  

I had "redundant links" configured at home: 

1. Using Sprint Broadband Wireless as my primary
connection
2. Using AT&T Global Dialer as my backup - use it
maybe once every two months.
(OS: Windows 2000 Professional)

But both of them stopped working.  Here is what
happened.  When everything was working (slowly), I
tried to speed it up.  I uninstalled TCP/IP protocol
and reinstalled it.  This is all I did.  After
reinstalling TCP/IP, my Sprint Broadband stopped
working.  Here are the symptoms:

1. I can ping Internet IP addresses but HTTP by IP
address does not work (so not an DNS issue)
2. HTTP by IP not working with Netscape error message
"Netscape was unable to create a network socket
connection.  There may be insufficient system
resources or the network may be down."
3. FTP does not work with error message "Can't create
socket - no winsock present."

I then tried AT&T Global Dialer.  It gets connected
but can't get authenticated saying "waiting for
authentication."

Sprint checked my cable modem.  They said it's a
workstation issue - not a network problem.  Sounds
familiar?

I called my company helpdesk for workstation support. 
He suggested deleting AT&T Global dialer icon and
rebooting PC.  He also said Uninstalling TCP/IP on
Windows 2000 is very troublesome.  I may have to
reinstall Windows 2000 to fix the problem.  He doesn't
know any other way to fix "winsock" issue on Windows
2000.

I believe it's a workstation issue: corrupted or
missing files.  But I don't know how to fix it.   The
workstation and all other applications are working
fine.  Any suggestions/ideas would be greatly
appreciated.

J.  Li



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto.  Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the
official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by it.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13547&t=13540
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Tim Medley

The 2610 doesn't have a fast ethernet port; it's a 10mb ethernet port
only. Can we see the config from the 2610? 

tm


Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice
Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kiran Kumar M
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]


Hai,

I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to
locate the solution.

Thanks in advance,
Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13548&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IP Helper Address [7:13539]

2001-07-24 Thread Hire, Ejay

An Ip helper address allows you to propagate (repeat) certain types of
broadcasts across the wan to one or more remote machines.  Two example of
things that are useful with helper addresses are DHCP, Win9x NETBios
Browsing w/o wins. 

-Original Message-
From: Jason Kinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP Helper Address [7:13539]


I have heard this term "IP helper address" used to reference a default
gateway.  Is an IP helper address the same as a default gateway?  If not
what is an IP helper address?  Do you know where the term came from?

Jason Kinney
925-961-0223




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13550&t=13539
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread John Neiberger

How are you accomplishing this?  The 2610 has *no* fast ethernet ports
and there are no fast ethernet modules available.  So, with no built-in
100BaseTX ports and no modules available, where did you get this fast
ethernet interface?

>>> Kiran Kumar M  7/24/01 11:40:42 AM >>>
Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet
in
2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other
side
(on switch side) it is also same  i.e., both are in auto. I tried
after
removing the auto option, but it is same situation.

Thanks,
Kiran





On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote:

> I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem.  However,
one
> thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on
a
> 2610 router.  According to the quick reference guide, there is no
fast
> ethernet module available for the 2610.  Unless they've come out
with
> something new, this may be your problem.  I'm guessing that you have
> your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do
> 10Mbps.  
> 
> In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610,
> that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port.  Those do not
support
> ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently.
> 
> If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.
> 
> Regards,
> John
> 
> >>> "Kiran Kumar M"  7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>>
> Hai,
> 
> I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I
am
> connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular
> VLAN,
> and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
> another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
> ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
> communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not
the
> problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable
> to
> locate the solution.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Kiran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13551&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IP Helper Address [7:13539]

2001-07-24 Thread Patrick Ramsey

no...the two are nothing alike

a default gateway is just thatyour next hop out.

and ip helper can be any address on any subnet that would generally answer a
broadcast from a host on a local segment.  But since routers stop broadcasts
by default, you must specify this address as a "helper" .

The router then takes would would normally be a broadcast and forwards it to
this "helper" address as a unicast.  (most commonly used in this scenario is
bootp/dhcp)

-Patrick

>>> "Jason Kinney"  07/24/01 12:52PM >>>
I have heard this term "IP helper address" used to reference a default
gateway.  Is an IP helper address the same as a default gateway?  If not
what is an IP helper address?  Do you know where the term came from?

Jason Kinney
925-961-0223




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13554&t=13539
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FW: What's wrong with CCIE today [7:13441]

2001-07-24 Thread Somchai U.

There might be no one ever certified.

Scenario:

After one finish first credential CCIE, a month later he/she will be
busy driving and cleaning the first Benz car. When he become
CCIE_MCSE, he will very busy checking about the new floor plan for new
home. When he become CCIE_MCSE_RHCE, he has fun driving the Ferari in
Bravery Hill. He know very well about where to find 105 octane fuel.

However, during reading book about CSA, he notice that his CCIE is to
expired (2 years quickly passed away, Oh no). He throw the CSA book
away, and return to the lab for preparation of CCIE exam. Within 3
months, He has extend his life as CCIE. As a bonus he is able to
acquire CSA in 3 months later.

But, Microsoft has launched new OS for two years, many exams in
current track has been expired. He has noticed that he is
CCIE_mcp_RHCE_CSA. Oh! ...

On 23 Jul 2001 20:55:50 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Jim McDowell") wrote:
>I think we need a new certification.  This can be developed by the members
>of the study group in favor of "smart" CCIEs.  We can call it
>CCIE_MCSE_RHCE_CSA_HP-UXCERT.  Only ten of these certs will ever be awarded.
>This will make their holders the most knowledgeable, well paid, (and
>probably the oldest), certification holders on the face of the earth.  No
>mortal will ever be able to question their abilities...until some 10 year
>old kid comes along and asks them how to  turn on an iMAC...which they will
>not know how to do.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13553&t=13441
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Kiran Kumar M

Sorry, I am testing it on 2620 not on 2610. You are correct in 2610 will
not be having FE. So in my problem first router is 2620, and the second
router is 2610 only.

Thanks,
Kiran


On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Kiran Kumar M wrote:

> Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet in
> 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other side
> (on switch side) it is also same  i.e., both are in auto. I tried after
> removing the auto option, but it is same situation.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kiran
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote:
> 
> > I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem.  However, one
> > thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a
> > 2610 router.  According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast
> > ethernet module available for the 2610.  Unless they've come out with
> > something new, this may be your problem.  I'm guessing that you have
> > your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do
> > 10Mbps.  
> > 
> > In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610,
> > that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port.  Those do not support
> > ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently.
> > 
> > If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > John
> > 
> > >>> "Kiran Kumar M"  7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>>
> > Hai,
> > 
> > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
> > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular
> > VLAN,
> > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
> > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
> > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
> > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
> > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable
> > to
> > locate the solution.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13552&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Stephen Skinner

Chaps,

i`m sorry i have to butt in here ...

the young man in question did say he had TWO 64k links .giving him an 
"aggreagte" of 128k...

also i have to agree and disagree( it not easy bieng me you know) about the 
line speed 

yes with Dial you only get 64k and that`s it but i HAVE downloaded files a 
LOT FASTER than that..

let me explain .

at 5am on wednesdsay morning i, on my dial-up started to download a 
fileTo my utter surprise the file download box was saying 100k a second 
(that is of course impossible)..it then slowed to a hum-drum 30k a second 
.download time 8 mins.

i tryed the same file again at 6pm (deleted original by mistake... DOH) and 
this time i got a lesuirely 5k per sec download time 40mins..

I can`t (be bothered to) explain it ...

but it just goes to show ..never believe the download box ...

" the truth is out there"...STOP THE SERIES...IT`S NOT THE SAME WITHOUT 
THEM

steve "who`s that behind me " skinner


>From: "Chuck Larrieu" 
>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: vpn speed [7:13499]
>Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:55:21 -0400
>
>the line speed is ALWAYS 64K
>
>yes you can use compression, and the net result end to end of user data MAY
>be higher. but the line itself can only transmit 64kbps
>
>subtle difference. some data formats lend themselves well to compression.
>gifs and jpegs and text, for example. I have seen pdf reduce word docs by 
>as
>much as 90% zipping files can result in compression of anywhere from 50-80%
>depending on the source. on the other hand, it is possible for compression
>to increase the size of the data file.
>
>but in all cases, your 64K data link can not transmit more than 64K bits 
>per
>second.
>
>Chuck
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Farhan Ahmed
>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:33 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]
>
>
>lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a 64k
>connection to internet
> > what would be the speed of the tunnel
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13556&t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]

2001-07-24 Thread Arun Upadhyay

Check this

  
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html

 Arun

--- Leonardo Borda  wrote:
> Does anyone know how many CCIE exist around the
> world?
> Does cisco publish that information?
> 
> Leonardo Borda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
Arun Upadhyay
SE Engineering
MCSE CCNA CNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13555&t=13545
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Kiran Kumar M

I am really very sorry for confusing all of you. My first router which is
having FE is 2620, and second router is 2610. 

Sorry again.

Thanks,
Kiran


On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote:

> How are you accomplishing this?  The 2610 has *no* fast ethernet ports
> and there are no fast ethernet modules available.  So, with no built-in
> 100BaseTX ports and no modules available, where did you get this fast
> ethernet interface?
> 
> >>> Kiran Kumar M  7/24/01 11:40:42 AM >>>
> Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet
> in
> 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other
> side
> (on switch side) it is also same  i.e., both are in auto. I tried
> after
> removing the auto option, but it is same situation.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kiran
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote:
> 
> > I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem.  However,
> one
> > thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on
> a
> > 2610 router.  According to the quick reference guide, there is no
> fast
> > ethernet module available for the 2610.  Unless they've come out
> with
> > something new, this may be your problem.  I'm guessing that you have
> > your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do
> > 10Mbps.  
> > 
> > In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610,
> > that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port.  Those do not
> support
> > ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently.
> > 
> > If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > John
> > 
> > >>> "Kiran Kumar M"  7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>>
> > Hai,
> > 
> > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I
> am
> > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular
> > VLAN,
> > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
> > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
> > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
> > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not
> the
> > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable
> > to
> > locate the solution.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Kiran
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13557&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Internet Rtr ACL [7:13559]

2001-07-24 Thread SH Wesson

Does anyone have a sample config of their ACL on their Internet router that 
allows certain traffic to go out and certain ones to come in. I'd like a 
sample of a live config to see how people are doing it.  Thanks.

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13559&t=13559
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IP Helper Address [7:13539]

2001-07-24 Thread fgh

ip helper address can be used to find a dhcp server on a different segment
than what you are. Your computer will broadcast a dhcp request (layer 3
which will not get through a router) for a dhcp server on a different
segment. ip helper address will allow your machine access to the dhcp server
through the router. however, be aware that ip helper address does open up
other ports.


- Original Message -
From: Jason Kinney 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:52 AM
Subject: IP Helper Address [7:13539]


> I have heard this term "IP helper address" used to reference a default
> gateway.  Is an IP helper address the same as a default gateway?  If not
> what is an IP helper address?  Do you know where the term came from?
>
> Jason Kinney
> 925-961-0223




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13558&t=13539
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]

2001-07-24 Thread NKP

see the posting up here of cheekin , it might help u out if it is from a
reliable source .

NKP

  /
""Leonardo Borda""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know how many CCIE exist around the world?
> Does cisco publish that information?
>
> Leonardo Borda




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13561&t=13545
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]

2001-07-24 Thread NKP

see the posting up here of cheekin , it might help u out if it is from a
reliable source .

NKP

  /
""Leonardo Borda""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know how many CCIE exist around the world?
> Does cisco publish that information?
>
> Leonardo Borda




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13560&t=13545
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Kiran Kumar M

Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet in
2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other side
(on switch side) it is also same  i.e., both are in auto. I tried after
removing the auto option, but it is same situation.

Thanks,
Kiran





On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote:

> I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem.  However, one
> thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a
> 2610 router.  According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast
> ethernet module available for the 2610.  Unless they've come out with
> something new, this may be your problem.  I'm guessing that you have
> your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do
> 10Mbps.  
> 
> In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610,
> that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port.  Those do not support
> ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently.
> 
> If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.
> 
> Regards,
> John
> 
> >>> "Kiran Kumar M"  7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>>
> Hai,
> 
> I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
> connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular
> VLAN,
> and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
> another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
> ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
> communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
> problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable
> to
> locate the solution.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13562&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Kiran Kumar M

Thanks for your mail. 

No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that
router. Infact I just copied it from the working router.

Thanks,
Kiran


On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote:

> sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610.
> 
> The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is
plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway".  Then
you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway.  (or at least
specify a specific route to the other vlans)
> 
> If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want
to keep the default gw out it's serial interface.
> 
> -Patrick
> 
> 
> >>> "Kiran Kumar M"  07/24/01 10:27AM >>>
> Hai,
> 
> I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
> connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
> and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
> another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
> ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
> communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
> problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to
> locate the solution.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13563&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



access list.. [7:13564]

2001-07-24 Thread Farhan Ahmed

What mask would be used if you want to create an
access list where the IP addresses (128.252.0.0 to
128.252.240.0) would be blocked
pls support with explanation,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13564&t=13564
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ccna challenge question [7:13565]

2001-07-24 Thread Farhan Ahmed

Last Weeks CCNA(tm) Challenge Question 
Question
Using classful assumptions, what is the directed broadcast address for
172.18.2.0 with the mask 255.255.254.0?

a) 172.18.2.255

b) 172.18.3.255

c) 172.18.255.255

d) 172.18.0.0
Answer
b)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13565&t=13565
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: access list.. [7:13564]

2001-07-24 Thread MikeN

To answer this question, we would need to know what the subnet masks are.

Thanks,
MikeN

""Farhan Ahmed""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What mask would be used if you want to create an
> access list where the IP addresses (128.252.0.0 to
> 128.252.240.0) would be blocked
> pls support with explanation,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13567&t=13564
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Kiran Kumar M

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Peter Slow wrote:

> Guys, 261x series routers do NOT have fast ethernet, NOR will they accept
> ANY network module w/ a FE interface.
> neither will 262x routers, whic have 1 or two FE interfaces built in.
> the same goes for 265x. one or two built in, but it it not possible to add
> more.


Yes it was 2620, not 2610. Sorry for mistake and confusing lot of people.
 
> 
> i am assuming from your description that there is another router in your
> network on that switch.

Yes I am having 2 more cisco routers (3660, and 2610) router and some
Intel routers (excluding the two routers (2620 and 2610)that I am
testing). Cisco routers are connected to L3 switch, and some of the Intel
routers are connected to L3 switch (but on different VLANS)and some of
them connected on L2 switch.

> if this is a true L3 switch, than your 2610 is NOT capable of being an MLS
> RP and there must be another one on the network somewhere.

But here my second 2610 ( in my question) is perfectly able to communicate
with others.

> your routers eth. interface will plug into a single VLAN, with an IP route
> either static or dynamic to those other VLANs via a next hop, the MLS RP on
> your layer three switch.

yes.. But I am not sure about MSL RP in my L3 switch ( I am using Extreme
networks Layer 3 switch)

> this is quite fundamental. is there an entry for the network you are trying
> to reach in your routing table.
> 
> I'm goign to take a wild guess here and assume that there is not yet.

No it is there, otherwise with the same configuration (my second) router
will not be able communicate...
 
> 
> tell us what kind of "L3 switch" you are using i need to know what
equipment
> you have, exactly, in this case, in order to help you.

It is Extreme Networks Summit Switch.
 
> i do not think that this is a default route probllem at all.

Yes.

> he is not supposed to be trunking to the switch, he should in this case
have
> a next hop on the VLAN that is connected to other VLANS, if this is a L3
> switching scenario.
> 
> I also think that what he thinks is a layer 3 switch is not capable of
> acting as one, or is not configured correctly.

As far as concerning with Layer 3 switch, I am not finding any
falut. Becuase it is perfectly working with the same port with the second
router. I am only facing the problem when I am connected 2620, with this I
am able to ping to that particular VLAN not beyond that.
 
> Kiran, tell us what equipment you have, and what network connections you
> have.

2620 Router--> L3switch --> other network

If I replace 2620 with 2610, then it is working properly. 

In L3 Switch I am having 8 VLANS on port base. And I am using static
routing in that.

Thanks for your detailed mail.

Kiran

 
> -Peter
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
> 
> 
> sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610.
> 
> The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is
> plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway".  Then
> you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway.  (or at
least
> specify a specific route to the other vlans)
> 
> If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to
> keep the default gw out it's serial interface.
> 
> -Patrick
> 
> 
> >>> "Kiran Kumar M"  07/24/01 10:27AM >>>
> Hai,
> 
> I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
> connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
> and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
> another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
> ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
> communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
> problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to
> locate the solution.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13566&t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: access list.. [7:13564]

2001-07-24 Thread Farhan Ahmed

def mask

-Original Message-
From: MikeN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: access list.. [7:13564]


To answer this question, we would need to know what the subnet masks are.

Thanks,
MikeN

""Farhan Ahmed""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What mask would be used if you want to create an
> access list where the IP addresses (128.252.0.0 to
> 128.252.240.0) would be blocked
> pls support with explanation,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13569&t=13564
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   >