Re: All-In-One, Lab #43, BGP path selection [7:19182]
yes. The network statement that the authors used for OSPF would include that interface, so they decided that prevent RouterB and RouterC from sending updates to RouterA by issuing a passive-inteface statement. Think about why they did that - one reason they did that is because RouterA is in a different BGP autonomous system, and one typically prevents IGP updates from going out to an EBGP neighbor. The network from ser0/0 still needs to be advertised out ser0/1 (within the same BGP AS), hence its inclusion in the OSPF process. - Original Message - From: "Alex Lee" To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:31 AM Subject: Re: All-In-One, Lab #43, BGP path selection [7:19182] > Group, > > There is a 'passive-interface Serial0/0' subcommand under 'router ospf 64' > on both RouterB and RouterC. When I do a 'sh ip ospf int s0', I can see > something like 'No Hellos '. > > Am I correct to assume that this 'passive-int serial0/0' is configured to > prevent RouterB and RouterC from sending Hello packets out of their > Serial0/0 interface to RouterA ? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19235&t=19182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about split horizon & IPX [7:19232]
Hi Neither books give any details as to why you would do it. The one says you can if you want (may in situations where you are using fram relay. The other book says you can't disable it at all (ever). Thanks ""Fanglo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > Can you specify why your book state you cannot do so? Under what situation? > > Regards, > Fanglo > > Phantom wrote: > > >Hi > > > >I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable > >split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct > >and for which routing protocols can I do it. > > > >Thanks for the help > > > >Pieter Jordaan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19234&t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about split horizon & IPX [7:19232]
Hi, Can you specify why your book state you cannot do so? Under what situation? Regards, Fanglo Phantom wrote: >Hi > >I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable >split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct >and for which routing protocols can I do it. > >Thanks for the help > >Pieter Jordaan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19233&t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about split horizon & IPX [7:19232]
Hi I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct and for which routing protocols can I do it. Thanks for the help Pieter Jordaan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19232&t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally cleared CCIE written [7:19231]
Hi All , I finally cleared CCIE written on my second attempt , i had failed by scoriong only 65% in my first attempt . This time I got 80% . The lowest on all the sections was on LAN with 60% . This is the second time I have ever failed a test , out of my lat 25 tests given for Microsoft and Cisco , but it is a straight test overall which tests you thoroughly on all networking technologies . I had not prepared myself for DecNET , Appletalk and I was not quite well prepared on ATM as well .there were a few questions on these topics and lots of questions based on diagrams , the list of books which I had used for preparation were as follows : 1) Network Design and Case Studies 2) Routing TCP/IP part 1 and 2 3) OSPF Netowork Design and Case studies 4) Cisco Lan Switching 5) BSCN 6)Cisco Internetwork Design Some of the best materials are available on Cisco's web site as well . The test is very well prepared and tests you thoroughly overall in all topics , with some tricky questions as well . Be sure to read each and every word in this test , as there are 100 questions in it with limited time . I shall now be preparing for my home lab as I am planning to give my my first lab attempt by May next year after I complete my certification on security , I had compelted my MCNS test last month. How good are the practice labs offered by Cisco ? Any feedback on it is welcome . I am looking out for study partner in India for the lab test , if anyone is interested do contact me offline . Thanks everyone out here for your valuable contributions for this test . -- Navin Parwal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19231&t=19231 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 94%? that's possible! ;) [7:19165]
Don't you play for the New York Islanders? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexey Yashin Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 3:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 94%? that's possible! ;) [7:19165] Hello, colleges! The last week was so hard, but this doesn't matter because I passed CCIE Written exam with 94%. ;) Well, last minutes of test I had known my success, but I was impressed of this percentage when I press last button. ;) This test was not so hard for me, especially I should notice accuracy of questions and fair of choices. A lot of questions was too tricky, but all what you need is only attention. Personally, I haven't problem with that. I have 6 years cisco hardware experience, I took my CCNA 3 years ago, and completed my CCNP/CCDP last year. I do my networking job every day, and I love that (isn't this reason for success? ;). But of course some useful things, books, webs help me a lot. Jeff Doyle, Caslow, Halabi - you shouldn't miss this. Boson preparation tests are useful too. Sybex CCIE guide is a nice blueprint for methodical study (but there's a lot of errors and lacks in some topics). In my opinion, for ccie written you must understand basic routing and bridging technologies inside and out, that's a big deal. That's not very cisco specific or hardware oriented exam (well, some questions are specific, but few of). You should memorize some hex values, but don't worry about that, because of lot of cramnotes on the web consist all you need. ;) Actually, all tips and url's are in this mail list already, but I want put this one: http://www.heinzulm.com/test.html There's bunch of questions. No answers. Good questions for feel yourself ccie prepared. ;) Try it. Okay, now it's time for lab. Let's look how I'm _really_ good. ;) >From Russia but with love. Vladivostok city, Russia. - Alexey Yashin, CCNP, CCDP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19230&t=19165 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any good books recommanded for lower 2 layers [7:19229]
Hi, Thanks for ur suggestions. A good person suggest me to order books online. But those books are in Dollars and the books I bought in China I pay in RMB on the same price ,which RMB is 8.2 :1 to US Dollars! How can i orders books online? they are so expensive :((( Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19229&t=19229 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OFF TOPIC: Old Joke, new faces [7:19227]
God finally had it. He decided to end the world. fire and brimstone, pestilence and famine. But before he pulls the switch, he decides to tell the three most important people on earth of the impending destruction, so that they in turn can prepare the people of earth for the end. So he does, and shortly afterwards, the following things take place. The premier of China calls his top advisors together and tells them "Comrades, I have some bad news and some more bad news. The bad news is that there is a god, and we were wrong. the more bad news is that he's destroying the world tomorrow." The president of the United States calls his top advisors together and tells them "I have some good news and some bad news. The good news is that as a religious nation, our faith has been validated. The bad news is we won't live to gloat." John Chambers calls his board of directors together and tells them "I have some good news and some more good news. The good news is that God has recognized that I'm one of the three most important people in the world. the other good news is that we no longer have to provide free bug fixes for our products." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19227&t=19227 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP lab question [7:19175]
Your are right about ccbootcamp.com scenarios are old & not pratical for the current Cisco lab exam anymore... Don't waste money there. jc0 ""Arun Upadhyay"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Group > I have subscribe ccbootcamp practice labs for > for my CCIE lab preparation. But their labs still has > VINES, DECNET, APPLETALK, ATM LANE...Which are not > part of CCIE lab any more. > > Can somebody suggest me who did or doing these labs > that how should I attemp those particular labs which > has these topics for configuration. > > Thanks. > Arun > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19223&t=19175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187]
interestingly, there was a short thread on NANOG about increased instances of script kiddie behaviour now that the college kids are back in the dorms. Just tonight there were a couple of posts about a big probe coming into someone's network, and originating from three particular blocks in Taiwan. get your NBAR up and running! Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Medeiros Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 3:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] Now you need to setup a fat access-list or CBAC for some security from all the idiots on your cable subnet. You wouldn't believe the probes I get every day!! This will be a little challanging for you cus of your dynamic address. Of course, since your router will be up all the time, chances are you will keep renewing the same IP. Let me know if you need some help on that. Better do it soon cus NAT won't protect you much, and you definitely need protecting. I run IDS on my router and log all the probes and @!#$ heads spoffing internal address and stuff. And believe me, that log gets pretty large especially when school is out !! Take care Tony - Original Message - From: "Bob Lepine" To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:39 AM Subject: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] > Woohoo. I got it working. I have my 2600 hooked up to my cable modem of > which I am a DHCP client. Thanks to the group for helping me figure this one > out! (Especially Tony Medieros and Leigh Anne Chisholm) I have now hooked > the router up to my 2900 switch and have access to the net with all my > computer. This will greatly enhance my studies. I am listing the > configuration for those who need to do the same. > Names have been altered to protect the innocent! > Current configuration : 997 bytes > ! > version 12.1 > no service single-slot-reload-enable > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > service password-encryption > ! > hostname BobRouter > ! > logging rate-limit console 10 except errors > enable password 7 045907031F23404B13 > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > no ip finger > ip host laptop 192.168.0.3 > ip name-server 24.229.12.230 > ip name-server 204.186.0.201 > ip name-server 204.186.0.203 > ! > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address dhcp > ip nat outside > half-duplex > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface BRI0/0 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Ethernet0/1 > ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 > ip nat inside > half-duplex > ! > ip default-gateway 10.227.49.1 > ip nat inside source list 10 interface Ethernet0/0 overload > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.227.49.1 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 > no cdp run > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password 7 05090A0A314E420C03 > login > ! > no scheduler allocate > end > > -- > Bob Lepine > MCSE,MCDBA,CNA,CCNA,MCT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19226&t=19187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: web pages not loading (from certain networks) but not a [7:19225]
In answer to this puzzle, the consensus on NANOG was that the problem may be related to an MTU mismatch. A couple of folks keyed in on "DSL" and the described symptom, and noted that there have been similar problems caused by MTU issues within the DSLAMS used by the carriers noted in the message below. As of this writing, the guy who asked the question has not reported any further information. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: web pages not loading (from certain networks) but not a [7:19074] Saw this one on NANOG today. Any of you troubleshooting gurus want to take a crack? ( BTW, I believe I saw this problem myself today. OTOH, my issue could have been related to that stupid proxy my employer now makes me use. ;-> ) I'll post the answer the NANOG folks suggested later this weekend. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nanog Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: web pages not loading (from certain networks) but not a routing issue. Ok guys, Interesting problem that seems to have started on Friday. Here's the deal, it seems that certain (not all) web pages on various sites we host are not loading for certain customers. It started on Friday with visitors on Verizon DSL waiting forever for pages to load. Yesterday and today PacBell DSL and some Netcom customers started complaining. This only seems to occur on HTTP traffic. If we have the visitors try HTTPS the pages load fine (with the normal encryption slowdown). We've looked at Layers 1-4, and can't see any problems, ping looks great, interfaces and cpus on routers, servers and switches look fine. It's almost like it's a transparent cache "bug". Anyone know if Inktomi, or any major cache vendors rolled out any new code this week? For that matter does anyone know what caches Verizon and SBC use for starters? Other variables: it only seems to occur on IIS based systems (I know I know, no flame wars or suggestions for replacements). Although it's not happening on all of our IIS servers. Any clues are greatly appreciated. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19225&t=19225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
modemcap [7:19222]
hi, where can i find modemcapentry for mica modem of 3660 & as5300 thanx kaushalenders Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19222&t=19222 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCBOOTCAMP lab question [7:19175]
Hi Group I have subscribe ccbootcamp practice labs for for my CCIE lab preparation. But their labs still has VINES, DECNET, APPLETALK, ATM LANE...Which are not part of CCIE lab any more. Can somebody suggest me who did or doing these labs that how should I attemp those particular labs which has these topics for configuration. Thanks. Arun __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19175&t=19175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF authentication question. [7:18813]
Well, I got something like this while playing with tacacs+ AAA . Cat 6509 MSFC and Tacacs+ server weren't talk to each other . Configuration looked good , the key was correct , but wasn't working . Besides , the 7200 router had the same tacacs+ config and was working . On MSFC I had to remove the tacacs+ key and enter it again . My guess is that maybe I had typed the space bar after the key ,and the router recognized it as part of key . I removed , typed the tacacs+ key , and pressed enter . This worked . Hope this helps , Terada At 19:17 07/09/2001 -0400, Baker, Jason wrote: >could be something to do with the defaults for the IOS. > >default for some IOS is clear tect, and some version IOS is encrypted. > >Jason > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rajesh Kumar [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, 7 September 2001 11:22 am > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: OSPF authentication question. [7:18813] > > > > Hi all, > > > > The scenario is this : > > > > Three router pod in a triangular fashion connected via ethernet ports to > > a switch in a common vlan. > > > > > > > > router a > > | e0 > > | > >router b -switch---router c > > e0fa0/0 > > > > > > OSPF is running between ethernet interfaces in area 0. Normal OSPF > > works fine and each router has entries about the other in > > "sh ip ospf neighbor" output. > > > > I was trying authentication commands. I started enabling authentication > > in area 0 under router ospf config " area 0 auth mess-dig" > > and in the interface e0 I gave " ip ospf mess-digest-key 1 md5 7 abc" > > > > I gave the above commands in router b and router a - it was working > > fine. they could exchange the OSPF information. When I gave the same > > thing in router c - router c couldn't be seen in other routers. > > > > I tried several times but in vain. The only difference between the > > routers is router c has fastethernet and models are : > > > > 1. router b 4500 > > 2. router a 2514 > > 3 router c 2600 > > > > On enabling the command : debug ip ospf events on router c, I observed > > Mismatch authentication keys but I used the same authentication key , > > number and the password. > > > > > > Any insights would be highly appreciated. > > > > > > thanks > > rajesh > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a > > name > > of pikumar.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19154&t=18813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335]
Cisco 506 was recently on ebay and it sold for $960. Retail price is about $1400. With corp discounts, it's about 900-1000. Does this Pix does everything? Maybe. At least you know it works, and one does not have to scour vendors to find the flash card. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hundley, Kent Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] Where did you get a quote for $100? The prices I have been quoted for the 16MB ISA flash card from Cisco were considerably more than that. I don't remember exactly what the price was but it was somewhere around $700-$800 if memory serves. -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] well the flash card is only $100 dls, that pretty cheap versus going and buying a pix -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kent Hundley Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] I have tried building the PIX from a PC in the past and the sticking point is getting the correct ISA flash card. Unless there is some magic you know of, the card has to support booting from certain memory addresses or it won't work. (or at least it didn't when I tried) The PIX actually loads its bios from the flash card, so without the correct flash card you won't get far. If you got your flash from a friend, did they get it from a PIX? If so, this is obviously "cheating" since the point of trying to build a PIX is that you don't have one to get the flash card from in the first place. If not, where did they get it and what is the manufacturer and model? Regards, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sean Young Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] OK, I have been getting 256 emails for the past few days regarding how to build a PIX out of an old PC. Now for thos, who have all the spare parts, you just have to wait a tad longer until everyone in the group get their parts so that we can build the PIX together at once. Regarding the flash card, this is rather an old technology before the PCMCIA card the old machine use to store program instead of the hard-drive or other means. The flash card I am talking about is the one that looks like an old ISA video card that gets inserted into the ISA slot on the motherboard. Because PIX doesn't use hard-drive, this flash card is where the PIX IOS code resides. I don't know where to purchase it. I got this card from a friend of mine. Another thing, as I've mentioned before, the NICs have to be Intel Etherexpress model 82577 (one of those weird shape looking card) or the PIX will not work. Now these cards you can get on Ebay very cheaply. Regards, Mike Johnson [CCNP Security Specialist] >From: "Paul Jin" >Reply-To: "Paul Jin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] >Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:06:45 -0400 > >Hey Mike, > >I am definitely interested. > >I am assuming than we can do this with almost any spare misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19198&t=18335 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124]
Thank you everyone for your invaluable moral support! It feels good to know that there is hope & room for development for us girls in the IT industry, abeit many had faced some kind of sexual discrimation from time to time. I've decided to save up enough to get my own cisco gears, get that CCIE title and prove my worth to those MCPs at my workplace. And... it's good to know that female CCIE exists!! Cheers, Eve - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:32 AM Subject: Re: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] Let me throw out some experience from the product development and related side of things. My immediate boss is female. I split responsibilities for guiding Nortel's interaction with the IETF routing area and the operational forums such as NANOG with a woman. In one cooperative research program, it's pretty evenly split. And yes, before I met one colleague in working on the theory of Internet convergence, it wasn't especially relevant what gender she was, just how we talked about protocol theory. Now that I've met her, we still talk exactly the same way about protocol theory, except that I'm now aware that, other than not having the mole, she is a clone of Cindy Crawford. In other words, I was first aware of her as a professional peer, still work with her that way, but also take male notice of her physically -- and do nothing about that but appreciate in a way that has no impact on our work. I am also aware of some male colleagues who are disgustingly good looking--that doesn't affect our relationships either. Among software developers at Nortel, things are pretty mixed--I certainly know women at the VP level, and they are first respected as engineers and managers. Cisco was founded by a married couple. I have four coauthors on the BGP convergence documents I'm working on in the IETF. Three are female, one of whom is co-chair of the BGP standards committee. I've had both female and male peer reviewers of my books. I've only had female editors, one of whom I loathed, but gender was irrelevant. Priscilla and I have worked together for years. If she refers to me as MCP, I assume she means Master Control Program. The only problem with working with Annlee and Leigh Anne is that their names occasionally get confused. >Good question. I'm still trying to find out why. > >Perhaps I'm just sick & tired of my colleagues looking down upon my >capabilities (being a female in this industry tends to be belittled by >others, >you see, esp in my part of the world.) Even the examination centers officers >are puzzled to see me taking Cisco exams, when they would expect only guys to >do such things. > >I'm being treated like a female clerk at the system integrator firm where I >worked, being excluded out of all technical discussions because the guys just >think "gee what do YOU know about this router/switch/firewall thing??" (For >your reference, I've got a degree in Electrical Engineering, degree in >Commerce, MCSE, etc etc). Is sexual discrimation prevalent everywhere in >this >IT industry, or just at my place? > >Guess I took my CCNP simply out of pride, just to show that "whatever you >guys >can do, I can do too." > >And perhaps, out of pride too, I will take my CCIE. > >Regards, Eve > - Original Message - > From: Jeroen Timmer > To: 'jap_e' > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:34 PM > Subject: RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] > > > Why even bother to be CCNP or CCIE when you never touch a router ?!?! > > It's not my concern what you do, or don't, but it just looked funny to me. > Gaining CCNP without playing around with routers and stuff ? Why you wanna >become CCNP ? > > > > grtz, > > > > JT > > -Original Message- > From: jap_e [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 2:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] > > > > The answer is Yes, you can be a paper CCNP. > > I just turned CCNP last week and I have never touched a router before. >Have >never logged into a router, not used any router simulator software. (Yes I >know how a router looked like from the pictures I've seen.) Neither did i >cheat by using brain dumps. > > All the information for passing the exams only came from the 4 Sybex books >(routing, switching, support, RA) Not trying to be proud here, but a paper >CCNP is possible. > > Will take my written CCIE soon. As for the lab exam, hmm... we shall >see... > > Cheers, Eve > - Original Message - > From: Christopher Supino > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 6:02 AM >
Re: Is there any good books recommanded for lower [7:19092]
>question 1 - at what level of detail do you wish to learn? > >For X.25, there is the CCITT specification (watch URL wrap) >http://www.itu.int/rec/recommendation.asp?type=folders&lang=e&parent=T-REC-X >.25 >for ATM, there is the ATM Forum Specification >(http://www.atmforum.com) >for Frame Relay, there is the Frame Relay Forum Specification >(http://www.frforum.com/) All good references, and there also are corresponding RFCs for the relationship of IP to them. Yet another level of detail gets into WHY the protocols are designed the way they are, since these specifications tell HOW they are defined. I do spend a good deal of time in my "Designing Addressing Architectures" book discussing how lower layer addressing relates to layer 3 addressing. You can go to the IETF page, navigate to working groups, and look around in the sub-IP temporary area to see how there's an attempt to come up with a unifying way how all these things relate to IP (including MPLS, GMPLS, POS, etc.) The Frame Relay Forum, in particular, tends to have well-written documents. Indeed, there tends to be a "forum" for most new layer 1-2 technologies, such as DSL or metro Ethernet. You can also browse to IEEE's site and find quite a bit about things like Resilient Packet Rings (802.17)--that's really still in the design phase, so there are a lot of presentations about different choices in the design. IEEE people tend to do much more readable powerpoint that in the IETF! > >question 2 - have you done a search on the web for any of those topics? >Here are some sample hits from google: >X.25 >http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~jain/cis777-99/g_4x25.htm >asynchronous transfer mode >http://cne.gmu.edu/modules/atm/Texttut.html >Frame Relay >http://www.alliancedatacom.com/frame-relay-tutorials.asp >Don't forget about digital subscriber line (DSL), too >http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/adsl/ > > >- Original Message - >From: "thinkworker" >To: >Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:13 PM >Subject: Is there any good books recommanded for lower 2 layers? [7:19087] > > >> I am trying to learn more about the lower 2 layer tech like >> X.25, ATM, Frame Relay in more detail. Is there any good books >> recommanded? I am reading a book named "emerging communications >> technologies 2nd editon" of Uyless Black, and I think it is only an >> overview of the topics. >> > > Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19126&t=19092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335]
No. Like I said, the problem is getting the right ISA flash card. I don't remember the exact model I tried, but I could not get it to work. The PIX bios is apparently coded to try a load itself from a particular memory address on the flash card. If the card you get does not support loading from that memory address it won't work. The easiest way around this would be to get the card from Cisco, but last I checked they were very expensive compared to generic cards. The poster I was replying to seemed to be saying they found a Cisco flash card for $100 and I was inquiring where they got it from. My opinion on this thread is the OP should post their instructions complete with the make and model of the ISA flash card they used. The only other information that would be useful is if someone knows a place selling _Cisco_ ISA flash cards for $100, or if someone has an ISA flash card that they know for a fact is the same as the one Cisco sells or that they know for a fact allows you to build a PIX. -Kent -Original Message- From: Russ Kreigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 7:18 AM To: Hundley, Kent; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] http://calibri.net/isa-doc.jpg Like one of these??? BTW has anyone gotten instructinos yet??? I am STILL waiting. -Russ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hundley, Kent Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 1:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] Where did you get a quote for $100? The prices I have been quoted for the 16MB ISA flash card from Cisco were considerably more than that. I don't remember exactly what the price was but it was somewhere around $700-$800 if memory serves. -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] well the flash card is only $100 dls, that pretty cheap versus going and buying a pix -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kent Hundley Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] I have tried building the PIX from a PC in the past and the sticking point is getting the correct ISA flash card. Unless there is some magic you know of, the card has to support booting from certain memory addresses or it won't work. (or at least it didn't when I tried) The PIX actually loads its bios from the flash card, so without the correct flash card you won't get far. If you got your flash from a friend, did they get it from a PIX? If so, this is obviously "cheating" since the point of trying to build a PIX is that you don't have one to get the flash card from in the first place. If not, where did they get it and what is the manufacturer and model? Regards, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sean Young Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] OK, I have been getting 256 emails for the past few days regarding how to build a PIX out of an old PC. Now for thos, who have all the spare parts, you just have to wait a tad longer until everyone in the group get their parts so that we can build the PIX together at once. Regarding the flash card, this is rather an old technology before the PCMCIA card the old machine use to store program instead of the hard-drive or other means. The flash card I am talking about is the one that looks like an old ISA video card that gets inserted into the ISA slot on the motherboard. Because PIX doesn't use hard-drive, this flash card is where the PIX IOS code resides. I don't know where to purchase it. I got this card from a friend of mine. Another thing, as I've mentioned before, the NICs have to be Intel Etherexpress model 82577 (one of those weird shape looking card) or the PIX will not work. Now these cards you can get on Ebay very cheaply. Regards, Mike Johnson [CCNP Security Specialist] >From: "Paul Jin" >Reply-To: "Paul Jin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] >Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:06:45 -0400 > >Hey Mike, > >I am definitely interested. > >I am assuming than we can do this with almost any spare misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19116&t=18335 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstu
Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
bummer! I just took it in June and it allowed me to do so. That's a big change in the exam if that is true. - Original Message - From: "Baker, Jason" To: "EA Louie" ; Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 4:13 PM Subject: RE: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > Correction. > > Had a friend just do the CCIE written and you cannot mark questions and go > back. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: EA Louie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 7:50 am > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > > > Time should not be a factor for the CCIE Written exam either. > > > > The difference between the CCIE Written and the other exams is that you > > CAN > > mark questions and come back to them later on the CCIE Written. Keep that > > in mind as you take the exam - it becomes a great time-saver when you get > > stuck on a question. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Tom Keough" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:10 AM > > Subject: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > > > > > > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it > > tomorrow > > > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. > > Did > > > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me > > time > > > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. > > > TIA, > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19221&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187]
@home uses private address in it's network a lot. Usually the access links are public though. That gateway is the address that his provider gave him I think. Tony - Original Message - From: "Cisco Nuts" To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 7:34 PM Subject: Re: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] > Hi, > > I am still not sure as to what the 10 address that the default route is > pointing to in the config comes fromI would assume that it would be > the next hop which would be the gateway address that a dhcp client(Win2k > pc) would get if it were in place of the 2600. Is this true? Please help. > I would like to try to config on my 2514. I have waited so long to hear > something like this work. And its wonderful that it actually works!! > Presently, I am using a Win2K Prof. box with 3 NIC cards and getting to > my inside network from work but the performance is not very good. I hope > this new config would help. Any ideas? Thank you very much. > > Kind regards. > > >From: "Tony Medeiros" >Reply-To: "Tony Medeiros" >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] >Date: > Sun, 9 Sep 2001 18:13:14 -0400 > >Now you need to setup a fat access-list > or CBAC for some security from all >the idiots on your cable subnet. You > wouldn't believe the probes I get >every day!! This will be a little > challanging for you cus of your dynamic >address. Of course, since your > router will be up all the time, chances are >you will keep renewing the > same IP. Let me know if you need some help on >that. Better do it soon > cus NAT won't protect you much, and you definitely >need protecting. I > run IDS on my router and log all the probes and @!#$ >heads spoffing > internal address and stuff. And believe me, that log gets >pretty large > especially when school is out !! > >Take care >Tony > >- Original > Message - >From: "Bob Lepine" >To: >Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 > 10:39 AM >Subject: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] > > > > Woohoo. I got > it working. I have my 2600 hooked up to my cable modem of > > which I am > a DHCP client. Thanks to the group for helping me figure this >one > > > out! (Especially Tony Medieros and Leigh Anne Chisholm) I have now hooked > > > the router up to my 2900 switch and have access to the net with all > my > > computer. This will greatly enhance my studies. I am listing the > > > configuration for those who need to do the same. > > Names have been > altered to protect the innocent! > > Current configuration : 997 bytes > > > ! > > version 12.1 > > no service single-slot-reload-enable > > service > timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > service > password-encryption > > ! > > hostname BobRouter > > ! > > logging > rate-limit console 10 except errors > > enable password 7 > 045907031F23404B13 > > ! > > ip subnet-zero > > ! > > ! > > no ip finger > > > ip host laptop 192.168.0.3 > > ip name-server 24.229.12.230 > > ip > name-server 204.186.0.201 > > ip name-server 204.186.0.203 > > ! > > ! > > > ! > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address dhcp > > ip nat > outside > > half-duplex > > ! > > interface Serial0/0 > > no ip address > > > shutdown > > ! > > interface BRI0/0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/1 > > ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 > > > ip nat inside > > half-duplex > > ! > > ip default-gateway 10.227.49.1 > > > ip nat inside source list 10 interface Ethernet0/0 overload > > ip > classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.227.49.1 > > no ip http server > > > ! > > access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 > > no cdp run > > > ! > > line con 0 > > transport input none > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 > 4 > > password 7 05090A0A314E420C03 > > login > > ! > > no scheduler > allocate > > end > > > > -- > > Bob Lepine > > MCSE,MCDBA,CNA,CCNA,MCT > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19219&t=19187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187]
Hi, I am still not sure as to what the 10 address that the default route is pointing to in the config comes fromI would assume that it would be the next hop which would be the gateway address that a dhcp client(Win2k pc) would get if it were in place of the 2600. Is this true? Please help. I would like to try to config on my 2514. I have waited so long to hear something like this work. And its wonderful that it actually works!! Presently, I am using a Win2K Prof. box with 3 NIC cards and getting to my inside network from work but the performance is not very good. I hope this new config would help. Any ideas? Thank you very much. Kind regards. >From: "Tony Medeiros" >Reply-To: "Tony Medeiros" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] >Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 18:13:14 -0400 > >Now you need to setup a fat access-list or CBAC for some security from all >the idiots on your cable subnet. You wouldn't believe the probes I get >every day!! This will be a little challanging for you cus of your dynamic >address. Of course, since your router will be up all the time, chances are >you will keep renewing the same IP. Let me know if you need some help on >that. Better do it soon cus NAT won't protect you much, and you definitely >need protecting. I run IDS on my router and log all the probes and @!#$ >heads spoffing internal address and stuff. And believe me, that log gets >pretty large especially when school is out !! > >Take care >Tony > >- Original Message - >From: "Bob Lepine" >To: >Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:39 AM >Subject: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] > > > > Woohoo. I got it working. I have my 2600 hooked up to my cable modem of > > which I am a DHCP client. Thanks to the group for helping me figure this >one > > out! (Especially Tony Medieros and Leigh Anne Chisholm) I have now hooked > > the router up to my 2900 switch and have access to the net with all my > > computer. This will greatly enhance my studies. I am listing the > > configuration for those who need to do the same. > > Names have been altered to protect the innocent! > > Current configuration : 997 bytes > > ! > > version 12.1 > > no service single-slot-reload-enable > > service timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > service password-encryption > > ! > > hostname BobRouter > > ! > > logging rate-limit console 10 except errors > > enable password 7 045907031F23404B13 > > ! > > ip subnet-zero > > ! > > ! > > no ip finger > > ip host laptop 192.168.0.3 > > ip name-server 24.229.12.230 > > ip name-server 204.186.0.201 > > ip name-server 204.186.0.203 > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address dhcp > > ip nat outside > > half-duplex > > ! > > interface Serial0/0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface BRI0/0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/1 > > ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 > > ip nat inside > > half-duplex > > ! > > ip default-gateway 10.227.49.1 > > ip nat inside source list 10 interface Ethernet0/0 overload > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.227.49.1 > > no ip http server > > ! > > access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 > > no cdp run > > ! > > line con 0 > > transport input none > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > password 7 05090A0A314E420C03 > > login > > ! > > no scheduler allocate > > end > > > > -- > > Bob Lepine > > MCSE,MCDBA,CNA,CCNA,MCT > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19214&t=19187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187]
That's exactly what I need to do on my 2514 router. One question I had on your config: your default route is pointing to a 10 address. Now is this the address of your cable modem provider's (next hop) or what? Please could you explain. The name servers seem to be pointing to that of your provider. Would also adding the dhcp server of the provider hurt? I am trying the config as soon as I send this email. Will let you know. >From: "Bob Lepine" >Reply-To: "Bob Lepine" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] >Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:39:04 -0400 > >Woohoo. I got it working. I have my 2600 hooked up to my cable modem of >which I am a DHCP client. Thanks to the group for helping me figure this one >out! (Especially Tony Medieros and Leigh Anne Chisholm) I have now hooked >the router up to my 2900 switch and have access to the net with all my >computer. This will greatly enhance my studies. I am listing the >configuration for those who need to do the same. >Names have been altered to protect the innocent! >Current configuration : 997 bytes >! >version 12.1 >no service single-slot-reload-enable >service timestamps debug uptime >service timestamps log uptime >service password-encryption >! >hostname BobRouter >! >logging rate-limit console 10 except errors >enable password 7 045907031F23404B13 >! >ip subnet-zero >! >! >no ip finger >ip host laptop 192.168.0.3 >ip name-server 24.229.12.230 >ip name-server 204.186.0.201 >ip name-server 204.186.0.203 >! >! >! >! >interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address dhcp > ip nat outside > half-duplex >! >interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > shutdown >! >interface BRI0/0 > no ip address > shutdown >! >interface Ethernet0/1 > ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 > ip nat inside > half-duplex >! >ip default-gateway 10.227.49.1 >ip nat inside source list 10 interface Ethernet0/0 overload >ip classless >ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.227.49.1 >no ip http server >! >access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 >no cdp run >! >line con 0 > transport input none >line aux 0 >line vty 0 4 > password 7 05090A0A314E420C03 > login >! >no scheduler allocate >end > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19213&t=19187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re[2]: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
I took the exam on Friday...And yes you can go back and mark the answers...Infact I have over 30 minutes in the end to go over the whole exam againThis was great as it gave me time to go over the marked questions...I made it with .78%...Not bad in that I took only 2 weeks to prepare for it...Good Luck!! :-) >From: "Baker, Jason" >Reply-To: "Baker, Jason" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Re[2]: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] >Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 21:10:55 -0400 > >He took the exam last week. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Perry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 10:54 am > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re[2]: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > > > Hello Jason, > > > > Sunday, September 09, 2001, 4:35:19 PM, you wrote: > > > > BJ> Correction. > > > > BJ> Had a friend just do the CCIE written and you cannot mark questions > > and > > go > > BJ> back. > > > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: EA Louie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 7:50 am > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > >> > > >> Time should not be a factor for the CCIE Written exam either. > > >> > > >> The difference between the CCIE Written and the other exams is that you > > >> CAN > > >> mark questions and come back to them later on the CCIE Written. Keep > > that > > >> in mind as you take the exam - it becomes a great time-saver when you > > get > > >> stuck on a question. > > >> > > >> - Original Message - > > >> From: "Tom Keough" > > >> To: > > >> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:10 AM > > >> Subject: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > >> > > >> > > >> > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it > > >> tomorrow > > >> > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time > > factor. > > >> Did > > >> > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For > > me > > >> time > > >> > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. > > >> > TIA, > > >> > Tom > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE > > >> _ > > >> Do You Yahoo!? > > >> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > I took the witten about two months ago and WAS able to mark questions > > and return to answer them later. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19212&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Break Signal to Unix Console from Cisco Terminal Server [7:19211]
Can anyone tell me how to configure a terminal server line to pass a break signal to a Unix box. Most Unix sys admins are using (ctrl+b) or (shift+esc) to send a break signal to the Unix box. How would I configure the terminal server line to pass these signals and not show them in the session windows. Many thanks CCNP RICO _ $BL5NA%a!<%k$O!"@$3&(B No.1 $B$N(B MSN Hotmail $B$G!*(Bhttp://www.hotmail.com/JA/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19211&t=19211 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RAM size [7:19210]
I am going to upgrade to latest IOS Images for 7206, 5300. RAM sizes installed in these devices are 64 Meg. But minimum RAM sizes for these images are 128 Meg. I think this RAM usualy used for BGP and routing tables. Is it right? So if I wouldnt keep whole internet in RAM, then i dont need upgrade, I think. Also is it usable 72 pin EDO SIMM RAM - s in the 7206, 5300? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19210&t=19210 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
Good Luck, Tom. -dlb ""Tom Keough"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it tomorrow > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. Did > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me time > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. > TIA, > Tom > > > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19209&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re[2]: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
He took the exam last week. > -Original Message- > From: Perry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 10:54 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re[2]: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > Hello Jason, > > Sunday, September 09, 2001, 4:35:19 PM, you wrote: > > BJ> Correction. > > BJ> Had a friend just do the CCIE written and you cannot mark questions > and > go > BJ> back. > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: EA Louie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 7:50 am > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > >> > >> Time should not be a factor for the CCIE Written exam either. > >> > >> The difference between the CCIE Written and the other exams is that you > >> CAN > >> mark questions and come back to them later on the CCIE Written. Keep > that > >> in mind as you take the exam - it becomes a great time-saver when you > get > >> stuck on a question. > >> > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "Tom Keough" > >> To: > >> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:10 AM > >> Subject: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > >> > >> > >> > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it > >> tomorrow > >> > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time > factor. > >> Did > >> > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For > me > >> time > >> > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. > >> > TIA, > >> > Tom > >> > > >> > > >> > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE > >> _ > >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > I took the witten about two months ago and WAS able to mark questions > and return to answer them later. > > -- > Best regards, > Perrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19208&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
Hello Jason, Sunday, September 09, 2001, 4:35:19 PM, you wrote: BJ> Correction. BJ> Had a friend just do the CCIE written and you cannot mark questions and go BJ> back. >> -Original Message- >> From: EA Louie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 7:50 am >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] >> >> Time should not be a factor for the CCIE Written exam either. >> >> The difference between the CCIE Written and the other exams is that you >> CAN >> mark questions and come back to them later on the CCIE Written. Keep that >> in mind as you take the exam - it becomes a great time-saver when you get >> stuck on a question. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Tom Keough" >> To: >> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:10 AM >> Subject: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] >> >> >> > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it >> tomorrow >> > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. >> Did >> > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me >> time >> > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. >> > TIA, >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE >> _ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com I took the witten about two months ago and WAS able to mark questions and return to answer them later. -- Best regards, Perrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19207&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
Thanks for all your comments and email!! I'll let you know tomorrow about marking and returning to the answers... This will be my 14th certification exam and I have not had one yet that I could go back and change my answers. It will be great if I can on the written. Tomorrow, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE ""Tom Keough"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it tomorrow > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. Did > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me time > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. > TIA, > Tom > > > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19206&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question on routing [7:19083]
Hi, It belive router A will use static route all the time. if s1 link goes down then 10.50.0.0 will be unreachable because static route has less administrative distance and you are not redistributing static in EIGRP. Malay Patel --- "Thomas N." wrote: > Hi All, > > I ran into a scenario below and I am not sure what > path router A will choose > to reach the destination network, 10.50.0.0 / > 255.255.0.0, on router B. > > 10.1.1.1 / 255.255.0.0 > | > --S0- Router A-S1- > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > --S0-Router B- S1-- > | > E0 = 10.50.1.1 / 255.255.0.0 > > --- > Router A configuration: > Interface serial 0 > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no shut > > Interface Serial 1 > ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0 > no shut > > Interface Ethernet 0 > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0 > > EIGRP 200 > network 172.16.1.0 > network 10.0.0.0 > no auto-summary > > ip classless > ip route 10.48.0.0 255.224.0.0 serial 1 > > Router B configuration > Interface serial 0 > ip address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0 > no shut > > Interface Serial 1 > ip address 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.0 > no shut > > Interface Ethernet 0 > ip address 10.50.1.1 255.255.0.0 > no shut > > EIGRP 200 > network 172.16.1.0 > network 172.16.2.0 > network 10.0.0.0 > no auto-summary > -- > > In this scenario, I assume router B knows how to > reach 10.1.1.1 using both > serial ports with EIGRP (administrative distance = > 90). Router A has two > paths to reach 10.50.1.1 destination: 1st path is > learned through EIGRP > with administrative distance of 90; the 2nd path is > with the static route > with network 10.48.0.0 and subnet mask of > 255.224.0.0 or 12 bits. If I am > not wrong, 10.48.0.0 / 255.224.0.0 will cover a > range of IP addresses from > 10.48.0.0 to 10.63.255.255; therefore, 10.50.1.1 > falls into this scope. > > If I do the "show ip route", I will see both routes > 10.50.0.0 / 16 and > 10.48.0.0 / 12. > > My questions are: > > 1. With those 2 paths to reach 10.50.1.1, which > path Router A will choose > as a primary path? > 2. If the path between 2 serial 0 of the 2 routers > is down, Can router A > reach 10.50.1.1 on router B with such a static > route? > > Thanks All! [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19205&t=19083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
not true. u can go back and check ur answers... "Baker, Jason" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Correction. > > Had a friend just do the CCIE written and you cannot mark questions and go > back. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: EA Louie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 7:50 am > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > > > Time should not be a factor for the CCIE Written exam either. > > > > The difference between the CCIE Written and the other exams is that you > > CAN > > mark questions and come back to them later on the CCIE Written. Keep that > > in mind as you take the exam - it becomes a great time-saver when you get > > stuck on a question. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Tom Keough" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:10 AM > > Subject: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > > > > > > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it > > tomorrow > > > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. > > Did > > > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me > > time > > > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. > > > TIA, > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19204&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
Correction. Had a friend just do the CCIE written and you cannot mark questions and go back. > -Original Message- > From: EA Louie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 7:50 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > Time should not be a factor for the CCIE Written exam either. > > The difference between the CCIE Written and the other exams is that you > CAN > mark questions and come back to them later on the CCIE Written. Keep that > in mind as you take the exam - it becomes a great time-saver when you get > stuck on a question. > > - Original Message - > From: "Tom Keough" > To: > Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:10 AM > Subject: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > > > > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it > tomorrow > > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. > Did > > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me > time > > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. > > TIA, > > Tom > > > > > > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19203&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:19202]
Never Hire a Certification, Hire a person. A Certification is a measure of a person's ability to achieve a standard of intellectual knowledge and rate themselves among their peers in the industry. CCIE's are people and like people their personal work habits, level of on the job proficiency, ability to design networks, and ability to troubleshoot problems will vary significantly. Networking is a very vast field and continues to expand everyday. Just because a person passes the bar does not make them a real estate lawyer. After the bar exam then an attorney will then specialize in one area of law. It is impossible for a newly passed CCIE to know everything about networking. In fact probably 50% or more of the material learned for the CCIE exam will never be used by a CCIE again. Why? Because networking is constantly changing. Five years from now the CCIE exam will probably have many new protocols that are not even invented yet and a lot of the current protocols will have dropped off of the exam scope. A truly successful CCIE, Networking Engineer, is one that continues to study and excel in their own area of networking while keeping sharp the basic underlying skills of networking. I believe the CCIE certification is a personal goal to see if I can measure up to my peers in the Industry. I also believe that it is a good thing to have on a resume to catch the interest of a company to get an interview. It is NOT a guaranteed ticket for success. Once you get the interview and the job a CCIE must then rely on their own talent, knowledge, and experience to win the job and guarantee a high salary. Buddy Jenkins Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19202&t=19202 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: transceiver setting. [7:19168]
Hi, On most devices turn the SQE OFF. This can cause heaps of problems particularly on repeaters and bridge devices. Be carefull however on things such as servers some older devices require SQE ON. For example older HP servers might not work with SQE OFF. In general turn SQE OFF. The test is for heart beat and comms devices do not like it. It can slow a network down to a crawl and appear to lift your collision rate through the roof. A sure sign of it being on is when looking at a bridge and you see every packet as a collision even when you have very little traffic. Just some thoughts Teunis, Hobart, Tasmania Australia. On Sunday, September 09, 2001 at 04:07:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > curious to know what do you guys set the SQE setting on your AUI > transceivers? is it in the ON position or OFF? im using these on the 2500 > routers... -- www.tasmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19201&t=19168 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187]
Now you need to setup a fat access-list or CBAC for some security from all the idiots on your cable subnet. You wouldn't believe the probes I get every day!! This will be a little challanging for you cus of your dynamic address. Of course, since your router will be up all the time, chances are you will keep renewing the same IP. Let me know if you need some help on that. Better do it soon cus NAT won't protect you much, and you definitely need protecting. I run IDS on my router and log all the probes and @!#$ heads spoffing internal address and stuff. And believe me, that log gets pretty large especially when school is out !! Take care Tony - Original Message - From: "Bob Lepine" To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:39 AM Subject: Easyip & cable modem [7:19187] > Woohoo. I got it working. I have my 2600 hooked up to my cable modem of > which I am a DHCP client. Thanks to the group for helping me figure this one > out! (Especially Tony Medieros and Leigh Anne Chisholm) I have now hooked > the router up to my 2900 switch and have access to the net with all my > computer. This will greatly enhance my studies. I am listing the > configuration for those who need to do the same. > Names have been altered to protect the innocent! > Current configuration : 997 bytes > ! > version 12.1 > no service single-slot-reload-enable > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > service password-encryption > ! > hostname BobRouter > ! > logging rate-limit console 10 except errors > enable password 7 045907031F23404B13 > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > no ip finger > ip host laptop 192.168.0.3 > ip name-server 24.229.12.230 > ip name-server 204.186.0.201 > ip name-server 204.186.0.203 > ! > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address dhcp > ip nat outside > half-duplex > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface BRI0/0 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Ethernet0/1 > ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 > ip nat inside > half-duplex > ! > ip default-gateway 10.227.49.1 > ip nat inside source list 10 interface Ethernet0/0 overload > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.227.49.1 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 > no cdp run > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password 7 05090A0A314E420C03 > login > ! > no scheduler allocate > end > > -- > Bob Lepine > MCSE,MCDBA,CNA,CCNA,MCT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19200&t=19187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No One on List can help for this??? [7:19169]
I did indeed already answer this: SNA uses 0100 0100 (0404 for DSAP and SSAP) (test frame) 0101 0101 (0505 for DSAP and SSAP) (session establishment) 1000 1000 (0808 for DSAP and SSAP) (during the session) 1100 1100 (0C0C for DSAP and SSAP) (during the session) To get 04 or 05, you could use 0100 (04) and a wildcard mask of 0001 (01) where 0 means must match and 1 means don't care, as in access-list wildcard masks. To get 08 or 0C, you could use 1100 (0C) and a wildcard mask of 0100 (04) where 0 means must match and 1 means don't care. Perhaps the 1101 (0D) is some weird way of combining everything? It could me a wildcard mask where 0 means must match and 1 means don't care. Notice that the third bit in for 4, 5, 8, and C is always 0 as it is in 1101 (D)! Ah hah, that's a clue! Cisco Lover, if that's not enough of an answer I do have one more piece of advice and it's not going to be nearly as nicely-worded as Urooj's advice. My advice is give up on the silly plan of jumping right into CCIE. If you can't even recognize a wildcard mask when you see it, then you need to start with CCNA. There's no shame in that. It's the way most people go. Priscilla At 10:55 AM 9/9/01, Urooj's Hi-speed Internet wrote: >Hi Cisco Lover, >To mitigate your agony and probably help you prevent any further grief, may >I suggest that you dig a bit deeper into MAC-Layer ACL's. Configuring newer >ones and understanding the current ones may, in fact, seem like a breeze. >Just browse through the following URL. > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/ibm_c >/bcprt1/bcsrb.htm > >It contains a lot of examples at the end. Try converting it into binary form >and understand them in greater depth. I recall a previous email by Priscilla >Oppenheimer explains them also. So, may I suggest that you also search the >'grourstudy archives' for them. And let me assure you that once you start >understanding them you will start enjoying them too. Have fun. ( One little >bit of advice also. You cannot cram an ACL's because this approach may do >more harm than good in the longer run.) > >Aziz S. Islam. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Cisco Lover >Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 4:12 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: No One on List can help for this??? [7:19169] > > >Hi Cisco Guys.. > >I am mashing my head for a long time for the answer of this Question and >have sent on list various times but no reply yet. > >CAn any one help to remove this confusion > >WHAT shoud be the address and mask when we deals with SNA traffic in DLSW+ >LSAP ACLS.?? > >I found ACL having two entries in Caslow as 0x0004 0x0001 & 0x0404 0x0001 > >but at some other places,I saw this as 0x0d0d 0x0001 and even as 0x >0x0d0d ?? > >Now I am really confused what is right or wrong ??? > >As far as I know this is the output of some ANDING but i am not sure where >it came from??? > >Any guy/CCIE can explain this plz. > >Thanks a lot. > >A Cisco lover > > > > >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19199&t=19169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
Time should not be a factor for the CCIE Written exam either. The difference between the CCIE Written and the other exams is that you CAN mark questions and come back to them later on the CCIE Written. Keep that in mind as you take the exam - it becomes a great time-saver when you get stuck on a question. - Original Message - From: "Tom Keough" To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:10 AM Subject: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] > Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it tomorrow > and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. Did > you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me time > was not a factor on the CCNP exams. > TIA, > Tom > > > Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19197&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TCP seq changed when cross Cisco PIX 525 [7:18764]
At 09:30 AM 9/9/01, Anatoly Shein wrote: >Hi >I'm not worried about hackers, the sending probe machine is not configured >to You're different from the rest of the world then. >receive any packet of this port. Actually probe is not sent via TCP stack, >but using raw socket >Therefore any hackers attempt to sent me packet will be answered with RST >frame. Not if you're under attach and are unable to send a RST. >Also I don't see any disadvantages of seq=1, it is easy to guess what is the >next seq number Well, the rest of the world, especially security experts, see a disadvantage with seq = 1. >also if you start from 342353122, for example. >seq can be easy computed as seq next = seq + len + ( ( SYN | FIN ) & flags ) >? 1 : 0; >Am I wrong ? The problem occurs where the hacker doesn't actually see the first frame and has no idea what the sequence number is but is still able to send a reply that looks legitimate. It's documented in most security explanations. Do some research. Check descriptions of IP spoofing. I did a search on Google and immediately found this article that looks pretty good: http://www.fc.net/phrack/files/p48/p48-14.html Priscilla >toly >-Original Message- >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:49 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: TCP seq changed when cross Cisco PIX 525 [7:18764] > > >Always starting with TCP sequence number 1 is a bad thing. It makes it easy >for a hacker to guess what the sequence number is and insert himself into a >connection establishment. > >So PIX and other firewalls let you randomize the starting sequence number >for TCP implementations that don't already do this. > >Priscilla > >At 02:48 AM 9/6/01, Anatoly Shein wrote: > >Hi > >I was encountered with strange situation. > >Probably one of your can help/heard about something alike. > > > >Problem description: > >There is sun machine connected to pair of Cisco PIX 525 > >On sun there is software sent TCP SYN probe packets > >with sequence number starts from 1 and increments for each packet. > >packets sent 1 for 50 mili seconds > >When packet cross router the sequence number is changed. > >This change is consistent for one set of packets but is not > >for subsequent set of packets > > > >for example : > >before ciscoafter cisco > >1. TCP syn seq = 1 seq = 1 + x > >2. TCP syn seq = 2 seq = 2 + x > >3. TCP syn seq = 3 seq = 3 + x > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19196&t=18764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another CCNP is born [7:18392]
Congratulations! I'm taking the CIT (my last one) on Friday. Thanks for the tips. Phantom wrote: > Well after 4 months of hard work and late nights I am finally a CCNP. > > I just passed the CIT exam with a score of 965. The exam was not very > difficult. If you studied hard for the other exams this one will be a > breeze. Only new stuff that wasn't in the other 3 exams is some apple and > IPX stuff. the rest was in the other exams. > > If you study the Cisco press "Cisco CCNP Support Exam Certification Guide" > you will be 100 OK. I didn't get anything in the exam that wasn't covered in > this book. The book is very accurate and to the point. Probably the best > CCNP study guide out there. > > The order I did the exams in is as follows > > Switching 945 > Routing 954 > BCRAN 954 > CIT 965 > > After switching and routing the other 2 are rather easy. Just study the > Cisco press guides and use the cram sessions from brainbuzz. The boson exams > are pretty good, especially for switching and CIT. also the edge tests that > come with the Sybex books are a big help. Sybex study guide has a lot of > information and will also be sufficient to pass the exams. But you don't > need both Cisco and sybex, only one will do and if I had to choose I would > choose the Cisco press books > > Now on to CCIE Written. > > I will apreciate any CCIE help you may have > > [demime removed a uuencoded section named smile.gif which was 11 lines] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19195&t=18392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: One Sided Chap????? [7:18056]
As Charlie says ppp chap hostname , ppp chap password x' worked for me. 1601 ISDN dialup to my ISP. Good luck ""Cisco Lover"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Guys... > > Any Idea how to setup one sided chap???that is only one router is sending > challenge?? > > > Thanks for the help.. > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19194&t=18056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to attach tokenring HUB [7:19176]
It's not a stupid question at all. I have only had consistent success with token ring once I started using IBM MAUs and Type 1 cable. If you must use Cat 5 or Cat 3 cable with RJ45 ends, then use an adapter that converts to IBM type1 at the other end of the cable(that would be for going from IBM to RJ-45, or, even better, get shielded cable that has RJ-45 at one end and Type 1 big, ugly hermaphrodite plug at the other end. This is not the first time I have seen this kind of question on this forum, and I would appreciate someone explaining why the IBM stuff works so much better. Is it teh shielding? Or is it that all the DB-9 to RJ-45 media filters are screwed up? (I did have some success when I made direct attach cables to connect workstations to my Catalyst 1800 token ring switch.) Tom Larus CCNP, MCSE (and passed CCIE written qualifier) ""Ahmed Mamoor Amimi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > I know this is a stupid question but u guys have to answer. I > have 2502 and a SMC MAU and want to connect > my 2502 with it but when i use a simple straigt cable to router and MAU > they both just tick and tick and router dont > get into the ring should i have to use other cable or i have to RING-IN > the MAU with RING-OUT . but how is this > done and to which port and what cable. > > -Mamoor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19193&t=19176 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
Time factor really is not a problem. Big chunk of the questions are relatively simple questions if you have already done the CCNP track. Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19192&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19191]
Tony, that was cool!! Keep posting plz!! --- Lou wrote: > Tony, > That is the best E-Mail I have personally ever read. > I am printing it and > adding it to my CCIE study board. > > Lou > CCNP, CCDP, CATM > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Tony Medeiros > Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 2:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE > (Warning !!! longish ) > [7:19098] > > > I have to agree with many, if not all the points > raised by everybody. > My humble take is that there are 4 types of > knowledge a great, capable of > hands on, design, etc. network engineer should have > in the perfect world. > CCIE or not. Bear in mind that I am talking about a > network engineer that > basically works with the equipment and maintains and > designs networks. > Other types of network engineers that design > hardware, software, and > protocols will come under a way different set of > rules I would think. > > 1. Basic network and protocol knowledge: > This should be how all layer 2, 3, 4 and many layer > 7 protocols work > including the management plane protocols, routing > protocols, STP, etc. Not > necessarily what all the frame/packet/segment > structures look like and where > and what each field in the PDU is and does. But > enough PDU structure to know > what the engineer is looking at and understand how > they work. Although this > is all excellent knowledge to have, I think it's > improbable (at least for > me) to know all the PDU structures in detail. The > main thing is to know the > behaviors (especially TCP) and how things can go > right or wrong. Some layer > 1 stuff is good to know too!! Like what does it mean > when I have slips on my > T1 interface or how a DS-3 works. Other things are > cabling issues, what box > does what, where do I use a certain box (bridge > vs.router, etc.), design > best practices, security issues and techniques. > Also host behavior and > configuration knowledge is invaluable. I'm sure I > left out a bunch of > stuff, but that is what I see as important(in my > limited experience) to know > > Most, if not all of number 1 can be learned by > reading books, RFC's white > papers, etc. Hands on experience will certainly > help. > > 2. Platform specific configuration: > It's great to know all the above stuff, but If I > can't make it happen on > whatever I am configuring be it Cisco, Foundry, > Extreme, or whatever. I am > of little use as a hands on engineer. It's nice to > know how EIGRP installs > a feasible successor, But if I can't get my routes > to propagate correctly > because I left out "no auto summary", that knowledge > doesn't serve me like > it should. OT. Why Cisco doesn't remove ALL > classfull behavior from that > damn protocol is beyond me!! Again, I believe it's > improbable to know how > to configure everything on even one vender or > platform. But, the engineer > should know when to punt and ask for help. Or know > how to access and find > the information he/she requires. And I don't just > mean calling TAC :) Even > though the wonderful people at TAC have gotten my > ass out of a ringer many > times. > > The Items in Number 2 comes from some book > knowledge. But hands on > experience is key. The experience of producing a > complex config and > fighting to make it work is the best teacher I know > of. Be it in a lab or > live network. I never forgot the first time I got a > DS-3 of ATM with about > 15 pvcs to work. Or even the first time I brought > up a simple frame link > and pinged across and watched my routing table to > grow !!! It was almost > better than sex !!(don't tell my wife please !!) I > know, I'm sick. :>/ > > 3. Experience, PERIOD !! > Many a time it has been when I fought to get > something to work and couldn't. > I checked the config against CCO, changed IOS's, > changed modules, changed > my underwear, etc. Ending calling up a more > knowledgeable peer to have her > tell me: "Oh, it's BLA, BA BLA". Type in the > undocumented "BLA BA BLA and > it will work." That is why having peers and is > essential to survival in > this business. Everybody of Group study is my peer > whom I glean information > and support. I am a firm believer in "no man/women > is an island' !! And > NOBODY knows everything. > > 4. The ability, motivation, and tenacity to solve > problems, learn, and do a > good job. (self explanatory) > > I believe no attribute in itself is the most > important, we need all of > them. > Sorry everybody for the long post. I'll refrain > from posting for a while. > Tony M. > #6172 > > - Original Message - > From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm" > To: > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:59 PM > Subject: RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE > [7:18843] > > > > Actually, it's likely the lawyer fresh out of > lawschool will do a better > job > > than the cratchety old lawyer that's had a few > y
Re: VERY Inexpensive DRAM for 2500 Series Routers! [7:19185]
> I passed this subject by the Paul B., the List Moderator & Chuck L. (Sr. > List Guru!) before posting this and have their OK to go forward. So don't > waste BW by flaming me! geez, Chuck... how Sr. ARE you??? ;-) and Greg, thanks for the info re: 2500 memory _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19190&t=19185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158]
Usually, no. The functions and system calls on a Unix machine are usually quite different than a Windows machine. You would have to run the daemon on the Unix machine you compiled on. Someone would have to port it over. At 01:07 PM 9/9/01 -0400, Cisco Nuts wrote: >That's pretty coolFree TACACS server !!! I have configured TACACS >before and yes we did have to put a login local option should the tacacs >server fail. I was just playing around with the privilege command. Thanks >for your help. > >I have a Unix box at work. Can I download the tacacs software on it, >compile it and then use it on a NT 4.0 box? Any instructions/directions >that you can provide is highly appreciated. -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19189&t=19158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19188]
Tony, That is the best E-Mail I have personally ever read. I am printing it and adding it to my CCIE study board. Lou CCNP, CCDP, CATM -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Medeiros Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 2:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19098] I have to agree with many, if not all the points raised by everybody. My humble take is that there are 4 types of knowledge a great, capable of hands on, design, etc. network engineer should have in the perfect world. CCIE or not. Bear in mind that I am talking about a network engineer that basically works with the equipment and maintains and designs networks. Other types of network engineers that design hardware, software, and protocols will come under a way different set of rules I would think. 1. Basic network and protocol knowledge: This should be how all layer 2, 3, 4 and many layer 7 protocols work including the management plane protocols, routing protocols, STP, etc. Not necessarily what all the frame/packet/segment structures look like and where and what each field in the PDU is and does. But enough PDU structure to know what the engineer is looking at and understand how they work. Although this is all excellent knowledge to have, I think it's improbable (at least for me) to know all the PDU structures in detail. The main thing is to know the behaviors (especially TCP) and how things can go right or wrong. Some layer 1 stuff is good to know too!! Like what does it mean when I have slips on my T1 interface or how a DS-3 works. Other things are cabling issues, what box does what, where do I use a certain box (bridge vs.router, etc.), design best practices, security issues and techniques. Also host behavior and configuration knowledge is invaluable. I'm sure I left out a bunch of stuff, but that is what I see as important(in my limited experience) to know Most, if not all of number 1 can be learned by reading books, RFC's white papers, etc. Hands on experience will certainly help. 2. Platform specific configuration: It's great to know all the above stuff, but If I can't make it happen on whatever I am configuring be it Cisco, Foundry, Extreme, or whatever. I am of little use as a hands on engineer. It's nice to know how EIGRP installs a feasible successor, But if I can't get my routes to propagate correctly because I left out "no auto summary", that knowledge doesn't serve me like it should. OT. Why Cisco doesn't remove ALL classfull behavior from that damn protocol is beyond me!! Again, I believe it's improbable to know how to configure everything on even one vender or platform. But, the engineer should know when to punt and ask for help. Or know how to access and find the information he/she requires. And I don't just mean calling TAC :) Even though the wonderful people at TAC have gotten my ass out of a ringer many times. The Items in Number 2 comes from some book knowledge. But hands on experience is key. The experience of producing a complex config and fighting to make it work is the best teacher I know of. Be it in a lab or live network. I never forgot the first time I got a DS-3 of ATM with about 15 pvcs to work. Or even the first time I brought up a simple frame link and pinged across and watched my routing table to grow !!! It was almost better than sex !!(don't tell my wife please !!) I know, I'm sick. :>/ 3. Experience, PERIOD !! Many a time it has been when I fought to get something to work and couldn't. I checked the config against CCO, changed IOS's, changed modules, changed my underwear, etc. Ending calling up a more knowledgeable peer to have her tell me: "Oh, it's BLA, BA BLA". Type in the undocumented "BLA BA BLA and it will work." That is why having peers and is essential to survival in this business. Everybody of Group study is my peer whom I glean information and support. I am a firm believer in "no man/women is an island' !! And NOBODY knows everything. 4. The ability, motivation, and tenacity to solve problems, learn, and do a good job. (self explanatory) I believe no attribute in itself is the most important, we need all of them. Sorry everybody for the long post. I'll refrain from posting for a while. Tony M. #6172 - Original Message - From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm" To: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:59 PM Subject: RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:18843] > Actually, it's likely the lawyer fresh out of lawschool will do a better job > than the cratchety old lawyer that's had a few years to become jaded by the > system or to get an over-inflated view of themselves. The new kid on the > block has something to prove so he'll go that extra mile to do a superb job. > Did I mention I used to head up an IT division at a major Canadian law firm? > (-: > > My point is... experience doesn't always matter. Brilliance and the > willingness to do
Easyip & cable modem [7:19187]
Woohoo. I got it working. I have my 2600 hooked up to my cable modem of which I am a DHCP client. Thanks to the group for helping me figure this one out! (Especially Tony Medieros and Leigh Anne Chisholm) I have now hooked the router up to my 2900 switch and have access to the net with all my computer. This will greatly enhance my studies. I am listing the configuration for those who need to do the same. Names have been altered to protect the innocent! Current configuration : 997 bytes ! version 12.1 no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname BobRouter ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors enable password 7 045907031F23404B13 ! ip subnet-zero ! ! no ip finger ip host laptop 192.168.0.3 ip name-server 24.229.12.230 ip name-server 204.186.0.201 ip name-server 204.186.0.203 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address dhcp ip nat outside half-duplex ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Ethernet0/1 ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside half-duplex ! ip default-gateway 10.227.49.1 ip nat inside source list 10 interface Ethernet0/0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.227.49.1 no ip http server ! access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 no cdp run ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password 7 05090A0A314E420C03 login ! no scheduler allocate end -- Bob Lepine MCSE,MCDBA,CNA,CCNA,MCT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19187&t=19187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158]
Hello Jeff, Here is what happened once I reset all the commands. Configured a level 3 for sh , for ping and for traceroute. When I do a sh run now, I see that the sh star and the sh run commands have been automatically set for privilege level 15. And when a user logs on with privilege level 3, NOW he cannot do a sh star nor a sh run command. Thanks for the help. Kind regards. >From: "Jeff Chambers" >Reply-To: "Jeff Chambers" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] >Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 02:00:50 -0400 > >You can reset a command to its normal priv level using the format > >privilege exec reset put_the_entire_command_here > >Configuring privilege levels for commands on a router can be very >frustrating. It also doesn't scale well in a medium to large >network. The best production method I have found is to use TACACS. >You can assign all users privilege level 15 and allow or deny >commands at the user or group level. In my testing (it has been >9 months or so, this may have changed), the user must be at privilege level >15 in order to receive valid output from the show running-configuration >command. It will return a blank configuration if the user is not >at privilege level 15. > >Jeff. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Cisco Nuts >Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 12:59 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] > > >Hi,I am trying to configure privilege exec level commands on my router >but am going nuts at the output of these commands:Basically, here is what >I have configured:#enable secret level 3 cisco! #privilege exec level 3 >ping#privilege exec level 3 traceroute#privilege exec level 3 show ip >route#privilege exec level 3 show startup-configuration#privilege exex >level 3 show running-configuration!# When I do a log in using enable >secret level 3, I can get the output of the #sh star command but not of >the #sh ru command?Also, when I do a sh ru on the router using regular >privilege level(15), I see 2 additional commands automatically configured >for me:#privilege exec level 1 show#privilege exec level 1 show ip It >will NOT let me remove these 2 commands nor will it let me change this to >privilege level 3.Nor will it let me remove any individual commands!!What's >going on? Any ideas? Thank you for your help.Kind regards.Nuts!! > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19186&t=19158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: VERY Inexpensive DRAM for 2500 Series Routers! [7:19185]
OK -- Now that I've got your attention -- let me note one thing before I continue -- I passed this subject by the Paul B., the List Moderator & Chuck L. (Sr. List Guru!) before posting this and have their OK to go forward. So don't waste BW by flaming me! I have discovered a Memory vendor local to where I reside (Northern Virginia) who appears hot to relieve himself of 16mb FPM Parity sticks (which are compatible in the 2500 series)! I met him at one of our weekly computer shows. He offered to sell me sticks for $7.50 and I counter-offered $5.00 which he accepted and then went on to explain that he has a whole lot of these sticks and nowhere to sell them. I did a quick survey of the other Memory vendors at the show and the prices range from $5.00 to 10.00 per 16mb stick. I am not involved in this in any manner -- and am only passing this info on for the possible benefit of Groupstudy list members. So, if you have any doubts -- then simply ignore this message. However, if you want to investigate this -- be my guest! The vendor is: Erik Spencer Memory Plus 2893 P.S. Business Center Woodbridge, VA 22192 (703) 730-9662 (703) 730-9728 http://www.upgradeplanet.com Greg Macaulay (Almost the )Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth Lifetime Member of AARP Retired Attorney/Law Professor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19185&t=19185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158]
That's pretty coolFree TACACS server !!! I have configured TACACS before and yes we did have to put a login local option should the tacacs server fail. I was just playing around with the privilege command. Thanks for your help. I have a Unix box at work. Can I download the tacacs software on it, compile it and then use it on a NT 4.0 box? Any instructions/directions that you can provide is highly appreciated. >From: "Sean Young" >Reply-To: "Sean Young" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] >Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 11:07:08 -0400 > >Don't mess around with privilege level command. Jeff is correct is that >you should build yourself a TACACS server (after all, it is free). >Another thing, Authorization, does it ring a bell? Even with TACACS, one >of the complaint that I've heard about customers is that somehow, if the >router can NOT reach TACACS server, somehow you will have to configure >local authorization (i.e. on the router) for this to work. If the router >can reach TACACS server, authorization on TACACS server can provide very >fine granular control over what a user can/can't do. Download the TACACS >source code from Cisco website and compile it on a UNIX box and you will >have a TACACS server to play with. It is very simple. > > >From: "Jeff Chambers" >Reply-To: "Jeff Chambers" >To: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Privilege Level command driving me >nuts!! [7:19158] >Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 02:00:50 -0400 > >You can reset a >command to its normal priv level using the format > >privilege exec reset >put_the_entire_command_here > >Configuring privilege levels for commands >on a router can be very >frustrating. It also doesn't scale well in a >medium to large >network. The best production method I have found is to >use TACACS. >You can assign all users privilege level 15 and allow or >deny >commands at the user or group level. In my testing (it has been >9 >months or so, this may have changed), the user must be at privilege level > >15 in order to receive valid output from the show running-configuration > >command. It will return a blank configuration if the user is not >at >privilege level 15. > >Jeff. > >-Original Message- >From: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Cisco >Nuts >Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 12:59 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] > > >Hi,I >am trying to configure privilege exec level commands on my router >but am >going nuts at the output of these commands:Basically, here is what >I >have configured:#enable secret level 3 cisco! #privilege exec level 3 > >ping#privilege exec level 3 traceroute#privilege exec level 3 show ip > >route#privilege exec level 3 show startup-configuration#privilege exex > >level 3 show running-configuration!# When I do a log in using enable > >secret level 3, I can get the output of the #sh star command but not of > >the #sh ru command?Also, when I do a sh ru on the router using regular > >privilege level(15), I see 2 additional commands automatically >configured >for me:#privilege exec level 1 show#privilege exec level 1 >show ip It >will NOT let me remove these 2 commands nor will it let me >change this to >privilege level 3.Nor will it let me remove any >individual commands!!What's >going on? Any ideas? Thank you for your >help.Kind regards.Nuts!! > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > >misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19184&t=19158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to attach tokenring HUB [7:19176]
>I know this is a stupid question but u guys have to answer. I >have 2502 and a SMC MAU and want to connect >my 2502 with it but when i use a simple straigt cable to router and MAU >they both just tick and tick and router dont >get into the ring should i have to use other cable or i have to RING-IN >the MAU with RING-OUT . but how is this >done and to which port and what cable. Don't know exactly about the 2502 but my 2504 works by using a normal DB9-ICS straight cable. In my opinion problems could arise if your relais are stuck or you are using different ring-speeds on the same MAU. DO NOT USE the Ring-in/Ring-out for connecting the router ! Tip: 0. Use CCO (Cisco Online) and the usual suspects err searchpages :0) 1. http://members.aol.com/mcapage1/8228tool.htm This is a page with info on self-assembling a MAU-test-tool. 2. Check your ring-speed on router (and other connected devices) (router)#sh int to0 3. Use the debug commands in global mode (router)#debug token ring or (router)#debug token events 4. Disconnect any other device than the router and try again cu Holger Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19183&t=19176 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All-In-One, Lab #43, BGP path selection [7:19182]
Group, There is a 'passive-interface Serial0/0' subcommand under 'router ospf 64' on both RouterB and RouterC. When I do a 'sh ip ospf int s0', I can see something like 'No Hellos '. Am I correct to assume that this 'passive-int serial0/0' is configured to prevent RouterB and RouterC from sending Hello packets out of their Serial0/0 interface to RouterA ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19182&t=19182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transition from private network to public [7:19181]
Is anyone aware of any links or research that discuss the advantages of taking a large enterprise from an expensive private network (OC-3s and private lines all over) to more use of the public network, in terms of cost reduction and efficiency? Many will still argue that a tightly firewalled private network is necessary, but -- out of the box here -- is it really? Couldn't one put protection on files and route them over the public network? Couldn't an enterprise save $$ by using the public network for email? At first, people might say, "No! we don't want all your corporate email dumped on the Internet, which is crowded enough." But, if corporations make more use of the Internet and develop more dependency on it, wouldn't they have more of a stake in the development and improvement of it? If anyone knows of any public white papers on this subject that have been posted or would like to share thoughts on this subject, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Lori Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19181&t=19181 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it tomorrow and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. Did you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me time was not a factor on the CCNP exams. TIA, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19180&t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158]
Don't mess around with privilege level command. Jeff is correct is that you should build yourself a TACACS server (after all, it is free). Another thing, Authorization, does it ring a bell? Even with TACACS, one of the complaint that I've heard about customers is that somehow, if the router can NOT reach TACACS server, somehow you will have to configure local authorization (i.e. on the router) for this to work. If the router can reach TACACS server, authorization on TACACS server can provide very fine granular control over what a user can/can't do. Download the TACACS source code from Cisco website and compile it on a UNIX box and you will have a TACACS server to play with. It is very simple. >From: "Jeff Chambers" >Reply-To: "Jeff Chambers" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] >Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 02:00:50 -0400 > >You can reset a command to its normal priv level using the format > >privilege exec reset put_the_entire_command_here > >Configuring privilege levels for commands on a router can be very >frustrating. It also doesn't scale well in a medium to large >network. The best production method I have found is to use TACACS. >You can assign all users privilege level 15 and allow or deny >commands at the user or group level. In my testing (it has been >9 months or so, this may have changed), the user must be at privilege level >15 in order to receive valid output from the show running-configuration >command. It will return a blank configuration if the user is not >at privilege level 15. > >Jeff. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Cisco Nuts >Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 12:59 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] > > >Hi,I am trying to configure privilege exec level commands on my router >but am going nuts at the output of these commands:Basically, here is what >I have configured:#enable secret level 3 cisco! #privilege exec level 3 >ping#privilege exec level 3 traceroute#privilege exec level 3 show ip >route#privilege exec level 3 show startup-configuration#privilege exex >level 3 show running-configuration!# When I do a log in using enable >secret level 3, I can get the output of the #sh star command but not of >the #sh ru command?Also, when I do a sh ru on the router using regular >privilege level(15), I see 2 additional commands automatically configured >for me:#privilege exec level 1 show#privilege exec level 1 show ip It >will NOT let me remove these 2 commands nor will it let me change this to >privilege level 3.Nor will it let me remove any individual commands!!What's >going on? Any ideas? Thank you for your help.Kind regards.Nuts!! > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19179&t=19158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No One on List can help for this??? [7:19169]
Hi Cisco Lover, To mitigate your agony and probably help you prevent any further grief, may I suggest that you dig a bit deeper into MAC-Layer ACL's. Configuring newer ones and understanding the current ones may, in fact, seem like a breeze. Just browse through the following URL. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/ibm_c /bcprt1/bcsrb.htm It contains a lot of examples at the end. Try converting it into binary form and understand them in greater depth. I recall a previous email by Priscilla Oppenheimer explains them also. So, may I suggest that you also search the 'grourstudy archives' for them. And let me assure you that once you start understanding them you will start enjoying them too. Have fun. ( One little bit of advice also. You cannot cram an ACL's because this approach may do more harm than good in the longer run.) Aziz S. Islam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Lover Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 4:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No One on List can help for this??? [7:19169] Hi Cisco Guys.. I am mashing my head for a long time for the answer of this Question and have sent on list various times but no reply yet. CAn any one help to remove this confusion WHAT shoud be the address and mask when we deals with SNA traffic in DLSW+ LSAP ACLS.?? I found ACL having two entries in Caslow as 0x0004 0x0001 & 0x0404 0x0001 but at some other places,I saw this as 0x0d0d 0x0001 and even as 0x 0x0d0d ?? Now I am really confused what is right or wrong ??? As far as I know this is the output of some ANDING but i am not sure where it came from??? Any guy/CCIE can explain this plz. Thanks a lot. A Cisco lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19178&t=19169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: yes,vtp can span router,cont [7:18892]
yes,it just went over a bridge,during the lab,i found the vtp info is only sent through the vlan1 ,and it can receive from other vlan. Jason wrote: > I think you are mistaken, VTP didn't go over a router, it went over a bridge > !! :-) If I replace the 8510 with another switch, it has the same effect > > ""Guest"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > yestoday,i setup a lab environment:using 8510,2924xl,3548xl and a pc as > > sniffer. > > 2924xl(0/24)hub--(0/0/1)8510(0/0/0)3548xl > >| > >| > > pc(sniffer) > > > > the first , i am using isl encapsulation in 2924 and 3548,vtp > > domain:test, > > 3548 is vtp server and 2924 is vtp client,disable the cdp > > ** > > 2924 > > interface FastEthernet0/24 > > description link to 8510 > > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > > switchport mode trunk > > no cdp enable > > > > 3548 > > interface FastEthernet0/48 > > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > > switchport mode trunk > > > > no cdp run > > > > in 8510,i just set up a simple bridge,nothing else: > > interface FastEthernet0/0/0 > > no ip address > > no ip directed-broadcast > > bridge-group 1 > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/0/1 > > no ip address > > no ip directed-broadcast > > bridge-group 1 > > > > bridge 1 protocol ieee > > > > > > then a add a vlan in the 3548,ok,in 2924,i find the vlan i created in > > 3548,the vtp is span to the 2924 > > > > the second ,I change 2924 and 3548's trunk encapsulation to dot1q,and > > change both native to vlan 2 > > the result is same. > > > > at last ,for 8510 does not support support bridging between supinterface > > encap dot1q,i change the encap to isl ,and > > i roll the sequence of bridging. > > > > > > interface FastEthernet0/0/0.1 > > encapsulation isl 1 > > no ip redirects > > no ip directed-broadcast > > bridge-group 1 > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/0/0.2 > > encapsulation isl 2 > > no ip redirects > > no ip directed-broadcast > > bridge-group 2 > > > > nterface FastEthernet0/0/1.1 > > encapsulation isl 1 > > no ip redirects > > no ip directed-broadcast > > bridge-group 2 > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/0/1.2 > > encapsulation isl 2 > > no ip redirects > > no ip directed-broadcast > > bridge-group 1 > > > > out of my thought,the vtp can still span from the 3548 to 2924, > > i check the packet captured by the sniffer,and find the reason, > > the vtp is always send out from the vlan 1,is independ from the native > > vlan, > > and in the third lab,the 2924 received the vtp messages from vlan 2,it > > also > > can identify the vtp info. > > > > i don't know how to output the sniffer captured packet to txt > > format,anyone who interest about > > it can send you the packet ,or someone who knows the way can tell me > > howto output txt format. > > > > thanks for everyone here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19177&t=18892 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to attach tokenring HUB [7:19176]
Hi all, I know this is a stupid question but u guys have to answer. I have 2502 and a SMC MAU and want to connect my 2502 with it but when i use a simple straigt cable to router and MAU they both just tick and tick and router dont get into the ring should i have to use other cable or i have to RING-IN the MAU with RING-OUT . but how is this done and to which port and what cable. -Mamoor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19176&t=19176 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: transceiver setting. [7:19168]
It's a test signal & as far as I know is pretty much no longer used. In my few short years in IT, it's never been something I've used... http://www.ots.utexas.edu/ethernet/sqe/sqe.html All the best !!! Phil - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 4:07 AM Subject: transceiver setting. [7:19168] > curious to know what do you guys set the SQE setting on your AUI > transceivers? is it in the ON position or OFF? im using these on the 2500 > routers... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19174&t=19168 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: transceiver setting. [7:19168]
Always off. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 3:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: transceiver setting. [7:19168] curious to know what do you guys set the SQE setting on your AUI transceivers? is it in the ON position or OFF? im using these on the 2500 routers... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19173&t=19168 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem about testing cisco GBIC ZX [7:19171]
Dear all : I 've are problem about testing cisco GBIC ZX in GSR. I just 've 50 M single mode fiber. Would you mind give me some information for test the GBIC. Story : Our client 've order 3 GBIC for Three-port Gigabit Ethernet Card . But, some problem in 2 GBIC can't pass connection test. Test 1 ) I use the SC fiber cross at both GI port at e.g ( Gi2/0 to Gi 3/0). The both 3GE-GBIC-SC status can not active & the all LED is off. I 've try to sweep the TX & RX position and sweep to next Gigabit Ethernet module..etc. Still no response . Test 2 ) Next test, it test is use the one fiber cable only (single side). Make the GBIC TX & RX in loop at single fiber. Just one GBIC can enable & up. Other GBIC still is no response ! Remark : In this section the fiber have tested at both tx & rx is up. Our GBIC is 1000BASE-ZX. Following massage back from TAC: ZX can reach about 70km, it is the most powerful one GBIC. Be sure to use attenuator, otherwise GBIC may be damaged by overpower level laser!!! In order to explain different performance from your 3 GBIC, I think we can look at the tx level of max 6db to min 0db. If the one tx 0db, certainly rx will below 0db. If the other tx 6db, 50m fiber is not enough to cause 6db loss, so interface is still down and GBIC may be damaged. 9/125um SM 1000Base-ZX SC 6 tx max 0 tx min 0 rx max -23 rx min 70 km 42 mile 1000Base-ZX can reach up to 100km (60mi) by using dispersion shifted SM or low attenuation SM Regards, Eric, Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19171&t=19171 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Basic VoIP Question [7:18859]
Keith< If you have a 2600 router or higher you can now run IP Keyswitch. This is a cut down version of Callmanager to support up to 24 IP phones only. You'll need 64mb or dram though on the router. IP Keyswitch was an enhancement of SRST for callmanager's, so that if the callmanager died, remote sites would still have active phones - check it out on CCO Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19170&t=18859 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No One on List can help for this??? [7:19169]
Hi Cisco Guys.. I am mashing my head for a long time for the answer of this Question and have sent on list various times but no reply yet. CAn any one help to remove this confusion WHAT shoud be the address and mask when we deals with SNA traffic in DLSW+ LSAP ACLS.?? I found ACL having two entries in Caslow as 0x0004 0x0001 & 0x0404 0x0001 but at some other places,I saw this as 0x0d0d 0x0001 and even as 0x 0x0d0d ?? Now I am really confused what is right or wrong ??? As far as I know this is the output of some ANDING but i am not sure where it came from??? Any guy/CCIE can explain this plz. Thanks a lot. A Cisco lover _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19169&t=19169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
transceiver setting. [7:19168]
curious to know what do you guys set the SQE setting on your AUI transceivers? is it in the ON position or OFF? im using these on the 2500 routers... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19168&t=19168 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
