Re: IE Written [7:41320]
Sorry if I seem negative but what does it matter what "we" think? If this is something you want, why not go get it? If you think that it'll put you in a more marketable position (i'm sure it will, even in Dallas) than why not do it. Not to mention, it's all about the knowledge man! (especially now that the industry pay has gone to the birds) Tim On 13 Apr 2002 02:39:36 -0400, in groupstudy.cisco you wrote: >I hope no one jumps on me about this but I am in Dallas and as most of you >know the market here is horrible. And that is an understatement. I am >wanting to go for my IE written in about 3 months but I only have a year of >experience. I know that is not enough by Cisco standards but it may be my >only option right now for another job. What do ya'll(had to throw that in) >think my chances are? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41352&t=41320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is better? MLPP or load balancing with IO [7:41249]
He could be referring to EIGRP load balancing (if using EIGRP). I have used both methods to balance traffic over multiple T1s. If you *are* using EIGRP, then let it handle the balancing as then there is no extra overhead associated with MLPPP. If your routing protocol doesn't support equal cost load balancing, then I would use the MLPPP method. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41330&t=41249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Question [7:41326]
Hi Richard, I am using Microsoft´s ISA Server in my network, works extremely well. Here is the link to the Microsoft ISA Server home page: http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/evaluation/overview/default.asp Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41353&t=41326 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IE Written [7:41321]
I hope no one jumps on me about this but I am in Dallas and as most of you know the market here is horrible. And that is an understatement. I am wanting to go for my IE written in about 3 months but I only have a year of experience. I know that is not enough by Cisco standards but it may be my only option right now for another job. What do ya'll(had to throw that in) think my chances are? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41321&t=41321 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
The CCIE Program is proud to announce the upcoming beta release of the new CCIE Routing and Switching Qualification Exam (351-001). This beta exam will be offered from Monday, April 15th, through Monday, May 6th, 2002 at all Cisco-authorized Prometric test center locations worldwide. Contact Prometric now to reserve your space. Candidates will be given 3 hours to answer 150 questions for this beta. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41340&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT Question [7:41326]
Hey guys/gals, My company is going to be considering buying a Proxy server. Can I get some feedback on the types of Proxy servers out there that this group is using and how your experience's with them have been? Only real considerations: 1. Fast as hell (of course) 2. Integration with NT/2000 AD 3. Easy Web or Console setup and continued maintenance 4. Redundancy options 5. Awesome reporting Perks would be if it intergrates well with PIX. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41326&t=41326 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Set Channel_id? [7:41303]
Hi Jeffrey, AFAIK, each (Fast)EtherChannel is automatically assigned a unique EtherChannel ID. I don´t think there is a way to manually set it. If you do a ´show spantree´, you can see the Channel_id assigned to the respective channel. Hope this helps. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41355&t=41303 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IE Written [7:41322]
I hope no one jumps on me about this but I am in Dallas and as most of you know the market here is horrible. And that is an understatement. I am wanting to go for my IE written in about 3 months but I only have a year of experience. I know that is not enough by Cisco standards but it may be my only option right now for another job. What do ya'll(had to throw that in) think my chances are? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41322&t=41322 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: aironet access point 340 [7:41339]
Hi George, You can try it : http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/aironet/accss_pt/in dex.htm Best Regards, Armando Santana Prolan S/A Brazil -Original Message- From: george gittins To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4/13/02 12:31 AM Subject: aironet access point 340 [7:41339] Wondering where i can find links to where i can configure the access point through the console with command line? George Gittins Internet Systems Manager Weslaco, Tx 78599 Phone (956)9696557 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41354&t=41339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IE Written [7:41320]
I hope no one jumps on me about this but I am in Dallas and as most of you know the market here is horrible. And that is an understatement. I am wanting to go for my IE written in about 3 months but I only have a year of experience. I know that is not enough by Cisco standards but it may be my only option right now for another job. What do ya'll(had to throw that in) think my chances are? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41320&t=41320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Memory [7:41266]
This is in the list archives: http://www.memoryx.com -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of The Edward Groove Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Memory [7:41266] Has anyone done any research on cheaper, yet compatible memory for the 2500 series routers? I'm looking for some cheap flash and DRAM for this line. Does anyone have any specs--or even better--manufacturer model names that you've tested that works? Thanks, in advance... Eddie _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41338&t=41266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
static route description again [7:41328]
i figured it out with the help of my friend Mr. Rthugo. the description of static routes is ios specific. below is a snapshot of using ios 11.2 (you cant do it) and one with 12.1(you can do it). 12.1 router: R4(config)#ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 ? Distance metric for this route name Specify name of the next hop permanent permanent route tagSet tag for this route 11.2 router: router(config)#ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 ? Distance metric for this route permanent permanent route tagSet tag for this route Jeremy Wright Network Analyst Archer Daniels Midland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (217)451-4063 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41328&t=41328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF problem [7:41195]
I don4t think OSPF v.1 ever went into production. More like a pure authentication issue. Phil. --- "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > Could one be ospf v. 1? > > Or could one be doing PT auth and the other MD5? > > ""STRAND Scott"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I had a problem between two OSPF neighbors. Here > is what I saw in the log: > > > > OSPF-4_ERRRCV Received invalid packet: BAD Version > > OSPF - Mismatch Authentication key - Message > Digest Key 1 > > > > My question is what is meant by "Bad Version". > Anyone seen this. > > > > Tks, > > Scott > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type > application/x-pkcs7-signature > > which had a name of smime.p7s] [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41284&t=41195 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traffic analyzer [7:41327]
While we're off-topic (somewhat) - What are people doing for non-Ethernet traffic analysis? I'm specifically interested in T1 and V.35 interfaces I've used Sniffers for this in the past with quite a bit of success however given the current state of the economy, etc. my current client is interested in seeing what their options are in this area. Obvously in the Ethernet Market there's Ethereal, Etherpeek, Network Instruments, etc. My preference would be to have the same interface (assuming it would be GUI...) regardless of the network technology being analyzed. I've been spoiled by the "distributed sniffer" product for remote sniffing and am looking for similar functionality. Thanks for the input. Ben - Original Message - From: "supernet" To: Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:42 AM Subject: traffic analyzer [7:41267] > Hi Dear Friends, > > I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I noticed a lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out > what they are. The problem is I don't have access to the branch office, > therefore, everything has to be done in main office. I tried sniffer > pro, etherpeek and anasil but they only allow me to specify a particular > source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Is there any other > software I can use? > > Thanks. > Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41327&t=41327 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
This is true also. If you attempt to telnet into the router, you will receive a message that an enable password is required but none set. I would (and do) use the access list if I have an enable password already set. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:13 AM To: John Allhiser Subject: Re: Disable Telnet [7:41293] If I am not mistaken, the router shall not accept telnet connections if it does not have a telnet password on the vty lines... Persio - Original Message - From: "John Allhiser" To: Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:20 AM Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > access-list 30 deny 0.0.0.0 > line vty 0 4 > access-class 30 in > > -Original Message- > From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > > > youre correct. i was answering too quick without thinking about it more. ive > done it so many times but i havent had any caffeine this morning so i only > process about half of my thoughts > > -Original Message- > From: Dimitris Vassilopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Disable Telnet [7:41293] > > > Jeremy, > > If you enter "no login" under vty 0 4, then you'll get into > the router! > > "login" means that the router prompts " Password:". > "no login" instructs the router to bypass that, giving > you access immediately. > > Dvass Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41325&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
That works for networks divided on octet boundaries, but what about when you want to capture a /22 or a /23? I actually needed the practice with dec->hex conversions & offsets, so I always went straight for the data pattern tab and never tried the wildcard in the address tab. Thanks for the tip. - Original Message - From: "Michael Williams" To: Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:23 PM Subject: RE: traffic analyzer [7:41267] > supernet wrote: > > > > but they only allow me to specify a particular > > source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. > > Why's that? Sniffer Pro will let you define entire ranges of > source/destination IPs in the filter. > > In Sniffer Pro, when you define the filter, simply put 192.168.1.* (where > 192.168.1.0 is the subnet and * is the wildcard). > > Works for me =) > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41356&t=41267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41324]
wait a second. i hold that job position :) -Original Message- From: Kelly Cobean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41318] Haaa.Can I re-write the job post...Pllaasss Client is seeking a highly seasoned CCIE with 5+ years of ISP/Large Enterprise experience who has done years of project management and can tie a neck-tie. Candidate must be currently un-employed, have no plans of becoming employed in the next year, and must be willing to work for %50 of his market worth. Candidate should enjoy getting jerked around at a moments notice and despise the thought of reward for work well done. Heck yeah...Sign me up (And maybe afterwards, you can take turns stabbing me in the eye with a kabob skewer!) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mlh Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [7:41253] Do you really think you can find a CCIE who is designed for your strict requirement? I don't think so. - Original Message - From: "Jeff Glaser" To: Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: Requirement for PT CCIE or near CCIE (DC based w travel) [3:4413] > Following is a new request that is very thin re details for competitive > reasons, but really hot. > > The client is seeking a PT (approximately 1 week a month) CCIE or near CCIE > who has worked extensively with CISCO 7000, CISCO 12000 and GSR in a > variety of situations and for multiple clients, who can be available and > travel one week a month, conduct assessments, write recommendations, etc. > The client will use this consultant, if they meet the criteria and satisfy > the end clients, about 6-12 times over the next 12 months. Therefore > communication skills, consulting skills, maturity, etc. mean something. > PLEASE understand that this is part-time, on an as-needed basis. It could > lead to full time--but given this market, that is a wish rather than a > guarantee. > > THIS IS NOT an entry level position AND IT IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR INDEPENDENT > CONSULTANTS (1099 or CORP-CORP) who are either US Citizens, Green Card > Holders or TN VISA holders. No agencies or third party > > RATE IS CRITICAL--If yu think you can bill yourself at BIG 4( sorry > Andersen) rates, then please save us both a lot of trouble.and don't send in > the reusme. > > > Send resume, contact information and billing rate (travel will be billed > separately) to me ASAP. > > Thanks. > > Jeff > > > Sincerely, > > Jeffrey Glaser > NewGen Technologies, Inc. > 703-729-3382 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41324&t=41324 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
No offense Strobel, but I know of no Cisco employee that 1) thinks he or she isn't more than one quarter of bad stock reporting away from losing their job 2) thinks Cisco is the panacea of employers (the millionaire stock guys/ gals have left and those left are eating sour grapes because they couldn't vested in time) 3) most positions within Cisco (namely the CCIE billets) don't generally pay the upper end of scale, unless you're lucky enough to be on a sales account with say someone the size of Time Warner/ AOL. Just my experience- having worked with current and former Cisco employees... Please don't get me wrong, logically it would seem Cisco Corporate is the way to go... All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] Larry, Well, it did work for me and as you see I am going for the lab now. Of course, ccbootcamp, Boson, cerificationzone these are all just tools. The actual result varies depending on the person's capacity. But, I am curious. Why do you want to become a CCIE? I want to become a CCIE with the hope and anticipation of a better job, a better income, and a better life. You already have a better life. Your signature says you work for Cisco, and you are constantly on this list. This means you are getting paid for surfing and chatting! This is an ultimate job. I love it. I don't believe any other employer would give you so much leway even if you were holding a PhD in brainsurgery. Where I work, we are not allowd to surf the web and participate in newsgroups when we are on the clock :-( Forget CCIE and hold on to your good Cisco Systems employer, and shoot me an application form if they are hiring :-) Best wishes, A Strobel (working on the lab exam) Quoting Larry Letterman : > Bernard's test does not work well, I would advise > using dennis L.'s boson # 3 test. Its a better test for > written. > > > Larry Letterman > Cisco Systems > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > > Kris, > > I am sure you will find tons of info on this subject in archives. > Strategies are different from person to person. > I used the following to pass my written: > > -Bruce Caslow's Book (1st or 2nd edition) > -Boson #1 by Bernard > -CCO > > You can add www.certificationzone.com to your arsenal if you are an avid > reader. They have excellent white papers. > > During the period that you wait and practice for you lab, you can read: > Halabi > Jeff Doyle (1 &2) > BGP-4 by parkhurst > and many more. > > Good luck, > A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) > > > > Quoting Kris Keen : > > > Hi All, > > > > I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the > process > > of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. > > > > What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more > advantgeous? > > > > I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. > > > > Please help... > > > > Thanks! > > Kris > -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- > This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41270&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
The one problem with running it on one power supply is that it can only power the first four blades. When booted it will only bring up the supervisor as well under the latest code releases. Older code will allow it to bring up the first four blades and leave the last two in a disabled state, if so equipped. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of x > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257] > > > Jeff, > We just bought a Cisco 4006 switch. Our reseller and > our Cisco rep both told us we need two power supplies > to run it and one for redundancy. They both went on > to say the power supply is the first thing to go. > They sold me on it so I got all three power supplies. > > I got the switch a few weeks ago and I threw in the > two 10/100 blades and the extra power supply. I > unplugged one power supply and it still seemed fine. > I decide to unplug another and leave only one running > just to see if it would die. It ran for 30 minutes > until I decided to plug it back in, keep in mind I > didn't have anything attached at the time. > > I am guessing if you really wanted to you could get > away with one, but when your spending that much(think > it was around $14k to $15k) an extra $600 or so to > protect your investment is no big deal. I also like > the fact that if two powersupplies die it will still > probably run and I can take my time replacing them. A > good night's sleep is worth $600 to me. > > > --- Jeffrey Reed wrote: > > Im trying to understand power redundancy in the > > Cisco 4006 switch. Reading > > through the online information, Cisco seems to imply > > you must have at least > > two power supplies up and running at all times. The > > 3rd power supply > > provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to run > > at least a partially > > populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a > > 4006 with SUPII and one > > 48-port blade, do I really need three power > > supplies? Anyone have experience > > with 4006s and power supplies? > > > > Thanks!! > > > > Jeffrey Reed > > Classic Networking, Inc. > > Cell 717-805-5536 > > Office 717-737-8586 > > FAX 717-737-0290 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41337&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IE Written [7:41321]
I live in the metroplex. There is work to be had in Dallas. The criteria for getting it is more difficult. By all means go for the CCIE. It takes 6-18 months for the sharp people and if it takes longer don't let it get you down. One of the best engineers I know took 7 attempts to pass the lab and the worst CCIE I know passed the first time. However, don't think that being a CCIE is the end of your troubles. CCIE will lend a little credibility and open some doors, it is still the experience that counts. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IE Written [7:41321] I hope no one jumps on me about this but I am in Dallas and as most of you know the market here is horrible. And that is an understatement. I am wanting to go for my IE written in about 3 months but I only have a year of experience. I know that is not enough by Cisco standards but it may be my only option right now for another job. What do ya'll(had to throw that in) think my chances are? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41357&t=41321 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Summarizatino at least! [7:41358]
5 months ago I was trying to implementent manual summarization on our hub-and-spoke eigrp network, but we had lots of troubles (inestability and convergence troubles). I suppose that my posts explaining the problem are still in the archives so I'm not going to repeat them here. I only want to say that we had inestability because we used an expect script for changing the configuration on all hub routers (think about this, we added the ip summary-addres eigrp 1 172.25.0.0 to 100 interfaces at the same time, I think this was too much for eigrp) Well, only two advices if someone is going to implement manual summarization on a hub-and-spoke eigrp network: 1.- You should do it step-by-step (no scripts) first change the configuration of one interface and then check that all is working fine. 2.- You should use the command eigrp stub connected in spoke routers, it's very important if you don't want to see a lot of SIAs wandering around your network. Regards, David. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41358&t=41358 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Now What???????? [7:40988]
I wouldn't see anything wrong with listing on your CV the fact that you have passed the CCIE written exam and are working towards taking the lab. I've chuckled before at people putting CCIE written in their signature blocks, but I think this is very different. It at least shows the employer that there has been an intent to progress towards CCIE rather than stopping at existing quals. I can see your point, and I think it should be listed clearly stating that it is just the written. My 2 penneth anyway. Gaz ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Careful now. I have been on the other side of the hiring process, and I > know quite a few hiring directors who will instantly throw away any resume > that says anything like "CCIE-written". The rationale is that they are > trying to claim a cert that doesn't exist, and so if they're willing to push > the envelope on that, then most likely everything else on their resume is > greatly exaggerated, if not an out-and-out fabrication. From what I see, > you lose more than you gain by listing such a cert. > > > > ""x"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Juan, > > Send me your resume and I will help you with it. A > > resume is a way of giving a hiring manager a 30 second > > snapshot of your career. > > > > 1.) I passed the CCIE written and I consider it a big > > accomplishment, so I have it on my resume. > > > > 2.) I have heard the All in one study guide is a good > > starting point, but I haven't gotten into it yet. > > > > 3.) no idea > > > > > > > > > > --- Juan Blanco wrote: > > > Team, > > > After your pass the written what do you do in > > > reference to the following: > > > > > > 1) Do you mention it in your resume and if you do > > > any suggestions (I know it > > > is not a certification). > > > CCIE Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) > > > Passed CCIE Written, Lab(schedule for xx-xx-xx) > > > Working on the CCIE Lab > > > Put nothing because the written is not a > > > certification.. > > > > > > 2) Any book which will help you to put together a > > > very organize and > > > structure plan of studding for the lab(very similar > > > to Caslow's book) > > > I already have the following books: > > > CASLOW, HUTNIX, DOYLE > > > 3) How similar are the labs and hardware layout from > > > the FATKID to the real > > > thing.I planning to use the same format (what is > > > your recommendation) > > > > > > Wow, the more we think we know the less we > > > know...I feel very > > > goodsome people are saying that I don't have a > > > life because all I talk > > > about is > > > Cisco...Cisco...routersswitchesbridges > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > JB > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41360&t=40988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I change Token Ring NIC's with Ethernet on the [7:41362]
I have a PIX Firewall with IOS 4.1.4 and 2 Token Ring NIC's. I tried to change with various Ethernet NIC's but the IOS don't recognize them. Why? I need of another version of IOS? Has someone this kind of IOS to give me? Thanks, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41362&t=41362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Networking Academy with 50$ on semester. Study at your [7:41361]
If you want to become CCNA with very good background in networking and want to study at your home with best Cisco courses, Cisco labs and Cisco router simulators (and assisted online by me, if you want) you may contact me by email. You'll receive an login account on the cisco.netacad.net and you will become a Cisco Networking Academy student. After course you'll receive a 50% off Cisco voucher fee for CCNA exam. Romeo CCNA, CCAI, MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41361&t=41361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please help [7:41363]
i have a client who bought our 155M atm service and the problem is the line is unstable, symptom is fitfull, average 24 once i have tested the line from the client port to my company's port with the professional equipmeht, all is ok, what is wrong, any suggestion? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41363&t=41363 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE lab test schedule [7:41300]
There are lots of seats available for the rest of this month and a few in early may in rtp. Usually as the one month deadline comes up people who are not quite ready start to cancel. So if you are going to be ready before oct, just plan to take the test and keep watching. About a month before you want to take the lab dates should free up. >From: "Kane, Christopher A." >Reply-To: "Kane, Christopher A." >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: CCIE lab test schedule [7:41300] >Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 23:49:54 -0400 > > > Does anyone know why there is no available lab test between June and > > September? Will the lab be closed for three months? > > > Ruihai > >I was curious about that too. I just scheduled mine and ended up in >October. > >-chris _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41364&t=41300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traffic analyzer [7:41327]
If you want to keep the same interface, I think sniffer pro has the market...
I mean...for serial sniffing, you could always go with any one of the
handheld devices that are out...but sniffer pro is the only one that I know
of that can do ATM/T1/E/FE/GE/FDDI/TR/etc all in the same gui.
-Patrick
>>> "R. Benjamin Kessler" 04/12/02 12:08PM >>>
While we're off-topic (somewhat) -
What are people doing for non-Ethernet traffic analysis?
I'm specifically interested in T1 and V.35 interfaces
I've used Sniffers for this in the past with quite a bit of success however
given the current state of the economy, etc. my current client is interested
in seeing what their options are in this area.
Obvously in the Ethernet Market there's Ethereal, Etherpeek, Network
Instruments, etc. My preference would be to have the same interface
(assuming it would be GUI...) regardless of the network technology being
analyzed.
I've been spoiled by the "distributed sniffer" product for remote sniffing
and am looking for similar functionality.
Thanks for the input.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: "supernet"
To:
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:42 AM
Subject: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
> Hi Dear Friends,
>
> I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I
noticed a lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out
> what they are. The problem is I don't have access to the branch office,
> therefore, everything has to be done in main office. I tried sniffer
> pro, etherpeek and anasil but they only allow me to specify a particular
> source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Is there any other
> software I can use?
>
> Thanks.
> Yoshi
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41365&t=41327
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dialer profile vs. rotary group? [7:41271]
Blair, Philip S wrote: > Rotary Groups > Multiple Physical Interfaces, One dialer Interface > > Dialer Pools > Multiple Physical Interfaces, Multiple Dialer Interface > > Dialer pool expands on the rotary concept by allowing a > physical interface > to belong to multiple pools, the dialer interface can then > reference the > pool of physical interfaces or multiple pools. Good answer. Sorry Sean. I wasn't trying to seem short in my first response, I was just trying to make clear Dialer profiles (Dialer Interfaces) versus Rotary groups as opposed to dialer pools versus rotary groups. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41366&t=41271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
Kevin Cullimore wrote: > > That works for networks divided on octet boundaries, but what > about when you want to capture a /22 or a /23? Good point. Had never thought of that. Most of our sites are either /16 or /24, however, we have alot of smaller branch sites that are /26. I guess in those cases tho, I would always setup the sniffer to sniff the traffic at the routers ethernet interface, in which was using a /24 mask didn't cause a problem because it captured all of the data from the /26 that I was interested in anyway =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41367&t=41267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-Relay Problem [7:41250]
Sean brings up a good point to check the maximum clock rate of your module. I've seen more than 1 person try to use the A/S module for 1.544Mbps However, the A/S module that he refers to supports a max of 115.2Kbps in async mode and when put into sync mode supports a max of 128Kbps. This module you speak of (NM-4T) should support up to 8Mbps on a single interface or up to 2Mbps on all 4 interfaces at the same time. (just to be sure I checked Cisco's site on that module and here's what I found: "The 4-port synchronous (sync) serial network module (NM-4T) has four DB-60 ports and provides a data rate of 8 Mbps on port 0, 4 Mbps each on port 0 and port 2, or 2 Mbps on all four ports simultaneously. The NM-4T network module supports only sync mode. " http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/hw_4t.html So you clockrate shouldn't be a problem at 64Kbps. It seems that most of any suggestions I could make have been covered here (framing, frame-relay switching, etc). I guess I would just start at layer 1 and work up from there. i.e. make sure all cables, connectors and even serial interfaces on the routers are good, then proceed up to layer 2 with debugs, etc HTH, Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41368&t=41250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263]
The list of exam objectives is entirely new. They didn't change the exam name or number and there was no announcement regarding objectives changing but they have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263] I looked at the site, but do not see any indication that it changed... what am I missing? I also looked at the retired exam page: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/endoflif e.htm Last one changed/retired was CCNA. Please let me know where I went wrong. I am taking this exam Monday, so I would like to be aware of any changes! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41369&t=41263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228]
ha ha ha Cisco should practice what you preach ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > the best one is not to use HT at all... > Get a term application that works... > > tera term, reflections, secure crt, etc.. > > > Larry Letterman > Cisco Systems > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > hall > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228] > > > I'm looking for a good hyperterminal program for linux, if anyone has any > recommendations. > > Thanks, > > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41370&t=41228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
A few concerns: I'm not sure that "leeway" to "surf" & "chat" constitutes a better life/job. That could just as easily be a sign that a position or a company is in in trouble due to lack of business. More realistically, not being allowed to "surf" newsgroups on company time means that you are denied access to solutions that are not documented anywhere else. This has several consequences: 1. You must use their time to duplicate extant solutions. 2. You possibly improve your skills by independently deriving the solution. This does not scale well for your employer: they have to wait for you to come up with answers that others can extract via an online search, and you become more expensive to retain over time (rendering your case for someone in the opposite or nearly opposite situation to be in possession of "a better life" all the weaker). The "chat" case is a little more ambiguous. While posting to newsgroups allows you to gain valuable practice (again, a case where you potentially further your own marketability), it does represent instances where you are sharing knowledge outside your employer's talent pool and are not working on revenue generating matters (note: I'm explicitly ignoring any social networking opportunities that might emerge as a result of such interaction). Other employers vary widely concerning these issues. I'm not sure encouraging a technically-oriented Cisco employee to forego pursuit of a CCIE certification holds up as valid (impartial) advice. As far as income/job/life goes, I'm not sure that any software/hardware provider is safe from having their business eroded by their own increasing efficiency or the efforts by competitors to leapfrog their current set of capabilities. The entire world is banding together to reduce IT salaries, and the success of those efforts would reduce both the overall quality and achievable salaries of the remaining jobs (caveat: some jobs would certainly remain interesting or possibly grow more appealing, but the number of positions available for those roles would probably shrink). Finally, I'm not sure that a company that routinely trims 5% during unimaginably good times is the right one to passively cling on to as suggested in your "Forget CCIE and hold on to your good Cisco Systems employer" suggestion. - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:45 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > Larry, > > Well, it did work for me and as you see I am going for the lab now. > Of course, ccbootcamp, Boson, cerificationzone these are all just tools. The > actual result varies depending on the person's capacity. > > But, I am curious. Why do you want to become a CCIE? > > I want to become a CCIE with the hope and anticipation of a better job, a > better income, and a better life. > You already have a better life. Your signature says you work for Cisco, and > you > are constantly on this list. This means you are getting paid for surfing and > chatting! This is an ultimate job. I love it. > > I don't believe any other employer would give you so much leway even if you > were holding a PhD in brainsurgery. Where I work, we are not allowd to surf > the > web and participate in newsgroups when we are on the clock > > Forget CCIE and hold on to your good Cisco Systems employer, and shoot me an > application form if they are hiring :-) > > Best wishes, > > A Strobel (working on the lab exam) > > > > Quoting Larry Letterman : > > > Bernard's test does not work well, I would advise > > using dennis L.'s boson # 3 test. Its a better test for > > written. > > > > > > Larry Letterman > > Cisco Systems > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:20 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > > > > > Kris, > > > > I am sure you will find tons of info on this subject in archives. > > Strategies are different from person to person. > > I used the following to pass my written: > > > > -Bruce Caslow's Book (1st or 2nd edition) > > -Boson #1 by Bernard > > -CCO > > > > You can add www.certificationzone.com to your arsenal if you are an avid > > reader. They have excellent white papers. > > > > During the period that you wait and practice for you lab, you can read: > > Halabi > > Jeff Doyle (1 &2) > > BGP-4 by parkhurst > > and many more. > > > > Good luck, > > A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) > > > > > > > > Quoting Kris Keen : > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the > > process > > > of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading material.. > > > > > > What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more > > advantgeous? > > > > > > I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. > > > > > > Please help... > > > > > > Th
RE: BGP Aggregate Routes [7:41269]
This is AS path. The router br1.bne is in AS 3840. Hope this helps Jana. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41371&t=41269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please help [7:41363]
Please provide following output from client router: show int atm show controller atm show diag show run int atm show ver thanks, rahul. ""xie rootstock"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > i have a client who bought our 155M atm service > > and the problem is the line is unstable, symptom is fitfull, average 24 once > > i have tested the line from the client port to my company's port with the > professional equipmeht, all is ok, what is wrong, any suggestion? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41372&t=41363 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Question [7:41326]
In the proxy/cache space, the products from Network Appliance are considered by many, including myself, to be the best of breed. It meets all of your listed requirements and is consistently rated high in 3rd party reviews. You can check out their product line at http://www.netapp.com As far as integrating with the PIX, no proxy will integrate directly with the PIX. This PIX has no built in ability to work with a proxy, so it will have no knowledge of the proxies existence. HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Tufaro Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT Question [7:41326] Hey guys/gals, My company is going to be considering buying a Proxy server. Can I get some feedback on the types of Proxy servers out there that this group is using and how your experience's with them have been? Only real considerations: 1. Fast as hell (of course) 2. Integration with NT/2000 AD 3. Easy Web or Console setup and continued maintenance 4. Redundancy options 5. Awesome reporting Perks would be if it intergrates well with PIX. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41374&t=41326 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
If all that's needed is general traffic trend patterns, things like how much
traffic, what stations are talking to what other stations, protocols in use,
etc, then you can do no better than NTOP: http://www.ntop.org
It has a small footprint, fairly low overhead, gives you RMON type stats
through a nice web gui and much more. Plus it's open source. The main
disadvantage is a lack of comprehensive documentation, but there are mailing
lists for help, plus you get the source code. I'm using it right now for
network trending info and the amount of detail it provides is outstanding.
It's much better than a sniffer for macro level network information.
HTH,
Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sean Knox
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
Agreed. Ethereal beats Sniffer Pro, Etherpeek, or any other sniffer I've
used hands down. Best of all, it's free.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: traffic analyzer [7:41267]
send a linux box configured with X/ethereal and vnc out there and remote
control it from your end!
-Patrick
>>> supernet 04/12/02 12:42AM >>>
Hi Dear Friends,
I have 1 branch office connected to main office by frame relay. I
noticed a lot of traffic across this link and would like to find out
what they are. The problem is I don't have access to the branch office,
therefore, everything has to be done in main office. I tried sniffer
pro, etherpeek and anasil but they only allow me to specify a particular
source IP, not the whole branch office subnet. Is there any other
software I can use?
Thanks.
Yoshi
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41375&t=41267
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup [7:41268]
Uh, what are you talking about? Your question seems to be garbled. First of all, there are several ways to establish LSP's in IOS. If you want to set up LSP's using normal IGP, then just use LDP/TDP. JunOS also allows you to use LDP, or you can create LSP's manually (something that IOS cannot do). If you want to use MPLS-TE on IOS and you don't want to use opaque LSA's, then how about using ISIS extensions? ""LU"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I just noticed that in cisco you can not establish LSP without enabling OSPF > opaque LSA, this is quite different from Juniper. JUNOS allows you to set up > LSP just based on normal IGP information. Am I missing some commands in IOS? > Does IOS have a way to enable MPLS-TE without having OSPF opaque LSA? > > Thanks > LU Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41376&t=41268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CSIDS - now a CSS1 [7:41227]
I passed all 4 too. In my opinion the CSIDS was really the hardest exam. Many detail questions about single Signatures. I did see 2 different CSIDS exams, maybe one is easier. Tim Potier wrote: >I too just finished all 4 exams, and found that if sufficiently prepared for >the MCNS, the other exams were not terribly difficult... just a re-hash. >Used Cisco Press MCNS book... this will get you through all but CSIDS. For >that, I used used the Cisco website. > >Congrats on your success.Chewy Gravy wrote: > >>Just finished the CSIDS exam, completing the series of four to >>become a CSS1. >> >>My take, if anyone is interested, is below, and tests are in >>the order I >>took them: >> >>MCNS - I'm glad I took this one first, as it covered all the >>material of >>the next two exams. >>CSPFA - A slightly more focused rehash of MCNS. I referred back >>to MCNS >>quite a bit to clarify info. >>CSVPN - Again, most everything was covered in CSPFA and MCNS >>CSIDS - All in all, the easiest of the exams. >> >>In all cases, the only prep material I had was the courseware >>and Boson >>exams. I've worked with the Pix for 3 years, but unfortunately >>have no >>hands-on exposure to the CSDIS hardware. >> >>Almost all the tests were difficult, none terribly so, and the >>CSIDS exam >>was just this side of a joke. The tests were also better >>written than the >>CCNP/CCNA exams I've taken. >> >>If I wasn't so tired, this would be louder: woo hoo. >> >> >>Doug >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>= Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41377&t=41227 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Networking Academy with 50$ on semester. Study at [7:41378]
Unless you are asking someone to enroll in a school or institution that offers Cisco Networking Academy Classes, this is illegal and direct violation of the Cisco Networking Academy rules. Students are required to attend classes 100% in person. I am forwarding this email to Cisco. How could you advertise and make money out of this scam? >From: "Romeo" >Reply-To: "Romeo" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Cisco Networking Academy with 50$ on semester. Study at your >[7:41361] >Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 08:11:42 -0400 > >If you want to become CCNA with very good background in networking and >want to study at your home with best Cisco courses, Cisco labs and >Cisco router simulators (and assisted online by me, if you want) you >may contact me by email. You'll receive an login account on the >cisco.netacad.net and you will become a Cisco Networking Academy >student. After course you'll receive a 50% off Cisco voucher fee for CCNA >exam. > >Romeo >CCNA, CCAI, MCSE _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41378&t=41378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Networking Academy with 50$ on semester. [7:41373]
Romeo, this is not a warez group. Your comments will not be welcomed. More over Cisco monitors this site and you may already be in trouble because of what you said here. ""Romeo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If you want to become CCNA with very good background in networking and > want to study at your home with best Cisco courses, Cisco labs and > Cisco router simulators (and assisted online by me, if you want) you > may contact me by email. You'll receive an login account on the > cisco.netacad.net and you will become a Cisco Networking Academy > student. After course you'll receive a 50% off Cisco voucher fee for CCNA > exam. > > Romeo > CCNA, CCAI, MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41373&t=41373 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please help!!! [7:41002]
I seem to remember having a bit of a mare with similar. If you have no luck,
is using one of the async ports an option?
This is a working config from a 2509 using first async port:
line 1
autoselect ppp
modem Dialin
modem autoconfigure discovery
transport input all
stopbits 1
speed 115200
flowcontrol hardware
Gaz
""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I need some help for a Access Server setup.
>
> I am trying to setup a modem (netcomm 56.6k) to connect to a 2511. The
> modem is currently connected to the AUX port. However, no matter what I
> tried from my PC, everytime I make a connection, it comes up with a whole
> bunch of garbage.
>
> OK
>
> OK
>
> OK
>
> CARRIER 31200
>
> PROTOCOL: NONE
>
> CONNECT 31200
>
> __sSM~ErX9D`?ro"x`?@!S,@@`# B
>#o `@DZG?@"Z(S(?|p?
>cF42EmXUj"hYLh8[$ DD<>>06#"\(sqOKobt^U"Bt08
> S,,R '! P kfh(?L^H
> &E`jeDL?ez^P}}N\NAs-)
> ^al8b.ZTa!('P"Q-7sE-aOP> qGU!'!8"d/^erK? Oni`Stn!ma}8.e"j? zCg_$!hG"3gO?P
> g77 (FE. FpO]%?XB^P
> S.TS&eT8'
>
> 1gciz$F~?*@yV
>-=T
>
>
> And here is the config for the 2511 -
>
>
> con1.hkg#sh run
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> ! Last configuration change at 16:58:36 AEST Wed Apr 10 2002
> ! NVRAM config last updated at 16:58:49 AEST Wed Apr 10 2002
> !
> version 11.2
> no service pad
> service timestamps debug datetime msec show-timezone
> service timestamps log datetime msec show-timezone
> service password-encryption
> no service udp-small-servers
> no service tcp-small-servers
> !
> hostname con1.hkg
> !
> aaa new-model
> aaa authentication login default enable
> aaa authentication login tacacs-login tacacs+ enable
> aaa authentication login NO_AUTHEN none
> aaa authorization exec tacacs+ if-authenticated
> aaa authorization commands 0 tacacs+ if-authenticated
> aaa authorization commands 1 tacacs+ if-authenticated
> aaa authorization commands 15 tacacs+ if-authenticated
> aaa accounting exec start-stop tacacs+
> aaa accounting commands 0 start-stop tacacs+
> aaa accounting commands 1 start-stop tacacs+
> aaa accounting commands 15 start-stop tacacs+
> enable secret 5 $1$oWH7$vULnq40DABAEnJCyCzTR4.
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> no ip domain-lookup
> ip host br1.hkg 2001 172.16.1.1
> ip host br2.hkg 2002 172.16.1.1
> ip host dist-sw1.hkg 2003 172.16.1.1
> ip host sw1.hkg 2004 172.16.1.1
> ip host sw2.hkg 2005 172.16.1.1
> ip host sw3.hkg 2006 172.16.1.1
> ip host sw4.hkg 2007 172.16.1.1
> ip host modem 2017 172.16.1.1
> ip name-server 10.1.0.1
> clock timezone AEST 10
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255
> no ip redirects
> no ip unreachables
> no ip directed-broadcast
> no ip proxy-arp
> no ip route-cache
> no ip mroute-cache
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 10.6.255.1 255.255.0.0
> no ip redirects
> no ip unreachables
> no ip directed-broadcast
> no ip proxy-arp
> no ip route-cache
> no ip mroute-cache
> !
> interface Serial0
> no ip address
> no ip redirects
> no ip unreachables
> no ip directed-broadcast
> no ip proxy-arp
> no ip route-cache
> no ip mroute-cache
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial1
> no ip address
> no ip redirects
> no ip unreachables
> no ip directed-broadcast
> no ip proxy-arp
> no ip route-cache
> no ip mroute-cache
> shutdown
> !
> interface Async17
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> no ip redirects
> no ip unreachables
> no ip directed-broadcast
> no ip proxy-arp
> encapsulation ppp
> no ip route-cache
> no ip mroute-cache
> peer default ip address pool NetOpspool
> ppp authentication chap pap
> !
> ip local pool NetOpspool 10.6.255.17
> ip default-gateway 10.6.255.252
> ip classless
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.6.255.252
> logging buffered 2 debugging
> logging trap debugging
> logging 10.1.0.1
> access-list 11 deny any
> access-list 12 permit 172.16.1.1
> access-list 12 deny any
> access-list 99 permit 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
> access-list 99 permit x.x.x.x y.y.y.y
> access-list 99 deny any
> tacacs-server host 10.1.0.1
> tacacs-server key xx
> snmp-server community roxwap37 RW 99
> snmp-server community tobyup91 RO 99
> snmp-server trap-authentication
> snmp-server system-shutdown
> snmp-server enable traps config
> banner motd ^C
>
> con1.hkg
>
>
> ^C
> !
> line con 0
> exec-timeout 0 0
> login authentication NO_AUTHEN
> transport input none
> line 1 16
> session-timeout 60
> no exec
> exec-timeout 0 0
> transport input all
> line aux 0
> password 7 030752180500
> login authentication NO_AUTHEN
> modem InOut
> modem autoconfigure type default
> transport input all
> stopbits 1
> rxspeed 38400
> txspeed 38400
> flowcontrol hardware
> line vty 0 4
> access-class 99 in
> pas
Re: Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup [7:41268]
hmm, okay here is what I was talking about, you can not set up a LSP in IOS without enabling opaque or ISIS extensions. I did not make myself clear that I was talking about TE, so LDP should not be in the picture, as you can not reserve bandwidth with it, not till we have CR-LDP. Junos allows you using no-cspf to ignore the TE-database and set up LSP just based on normal IGP topology. I just want to make sure that I did not miss some IOS commands here. Thanks LU Another question about IOS LSP, what command do I use to advertise the LSP tunnel ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Uh, what are you talking about? Your question seems to be garbled. First > of all, there are several ways to establish LSP's in IOS. If you want to > set up LSP's using normal IGP, then just use LDP/TDP. JunOS also allows you > to use LDP, or you can create LSP's manually (something that IOS cannot do). > > If you want to use MPLS-TE on IOS and you don't want to use opaque LSA's, > then how about using ISIS extensions? > > > ""LU"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I just noticed that in cisco you can not establish LSP without enabling > OSPF > > opaque LSA, this is quite different from Juniper. JUNOS allows you to set > up > > LSP just based on normal IGP information. Am I missing some commands in > IOS? > > Does IOS have a way to enable MPLS-TE without having OSPF opaque LSA? > > > > Thanks > > LU Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41381&t=41268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Exec-timeout [7:41382]
How do you get the PIX to automatically log out the console if someone forgets to log out? The equivalent of exec-timeout in IOS? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41382&t=41382 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup [7:41268]
Well then the answer to your question is still yes, you can do it. I see that somebody on the Juniper list answered it, but I will answer it here too. You can set up explicit paths in your TE tunnels (tunnel mpls traffic-engineering path-option 1 explicit ...), and then set up a explicit-path. By doing so, you are creating the TE tunnels manually, so you do not need a TED, therefore you do not need OSPF or ISIS (or any routing protocol, for that matter) ""LU"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hmm, okay here is what I was talking about, you can not set up a LSP in IOS > without enabling opaque or ISIS extensions. I did not make myself clear > that I was talking about TE, so LDP should not be in the picture, as you can > not reserve bandwidth with it, not till we have CR-LDP. Junos allows you > using no-cspf to ignore the TE-database and set up LSP just based on normal > IGP topology. > I just want to make sure that I did not miss some IOS commands here. > > Thanks > LU > > Another question about IOS LSP, what command do I use to advertise the LSP > tunnel > ""nrf"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Uh, what are you talking about? Your question seems to be garbled. First > > of all, there are several ways to establish LSP's in IOS. If you want to > > set up LSP's using normal IGP, then just use LDP/TDP. JunOS also allows > you > > to use LDP, or you can create LSP's manually (something that IOS cannot > do). > > > > If you want to use MPLS-TE on IOS and you don't want to use opaque LSA's, > > then how about using ISIS extensions? > > > > > > ""LU"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I just noticed that in cisco you can not establish LSP without enabling > > OSPF > > > opaque LSA, this is quite different from Juniper. JUNOS allows you to > set > > up > > > LSP just based on normal IGP information. Am I missing some commands in > > IOS? > > > Does IOS have a way to enable MPLS-TE without having OSPF opaque LSA? > > > > > > Thanks > > > LU Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41383&t=41268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I change Token Ring NIC's with Ethernet on the [7:41384]
One minute prior to this post you sent one with your signature block on. Cisco Certified Academy Instructor asking for free IOS. Come on! ""Romeo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a PIX Firewall with IOS 4.1.4 and 2 Token Ring NIC's. I tried to > change with various Ethernet NIC's but the IOS don't recognize them. Why? I > need of another version of IOS? Has someone this kind of IOS to give me? > > Thanks, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41384&t=41384 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup [7:41268]
This does not work for me, that's why I posted to make sure. If I do not enable TE extension of IGPs, the tunnel refuses to come up, if I disabled TE-extension at the egress, the tunnel will go down. The response from others so far pretty much confirmed this. I do not have my configs now, but if you need I can send them when I get back to office, just to make I did not miss config anything. I assume you tested this yourself and made it work, if so, could you please share your configuration so we all, at least myself, can benefit. Thanks LU ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well then the answer to your question is still yes, you can do it. I see > that somebody on the Juniper list answered it, but I will answer it here > too. You can set up explicit paths in your TE tunnels (tunnel mpls > traffic-engineering path-option 1 explicit ...), and then set up a > explicit-path. By doing so, you are creating the TE tunnels manually, so > you do not need a TED, therefore you do not need OSPF or ISIS (or any > routing protocol, for that matter) > > > > ""LU"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > hmm, okay here is what I was talking about, you can not set up a LSP in > IOS > > without enabling opaque or ISIS extensions. I did not make myself clear > > that I was talking about TE, so LDP should not be in the picture, as you > can > > not reserve bandwidth with it, not till we have CR-LDP. Junos allows you > > using no-cspf to ignore the TE-database and set up LSP just based on > normal > > IGP topology. > > I just want to make sure that I did not miss some IOS commands here. > > > > Thanks > > LU > > > > Another question about IOS LSP, what command do I use to advertise the LSP > > tunnel > > ""nrf"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Uh, what are you talking about? Your question seems to be garbled. > First > > > of all, there are several ways to establish LSP's in IOS. If you want > to > > > set up LSP's using normal IGP, then just use LDP/TDP. JunOS also allows > > you > > > to use LDP, or you can create LSP's manually (something that IOS cannot > > do). > > > > > > If you want to use MPLS-TE on IOS and you don't want to use opaque > LSA's, > > > then how about using ISIS extensions? > > > > > > > > > ""LU"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > I just noticed that in cisco you can not establish LSP without > enabling > > > OSPF > > > > opaque LSA, this is quite different from Juniper. JUNOS allows you to > > set > > > up > > > > LSP just based on normal IGP information. Am I missing some commands > in > > > IOS? > > > > Does IOS have a way to enable MPLS-TE without having OSPF opaque LSA? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > LU Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41385&t=41268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228]
hyper term is not on my w2k laptop..reflections is..and all of my peers in Lan/IT use either reflections or secure-crt... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Chuck" To: Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 8:31 AM Subject: Re: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228] > ha ha ha Cisco should practice what you preach > > > > ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > the best one is not to use HT at all... > > Get a term application that works... > > > > tera term, reflections, secure crt, etc.. > > > > > > Larry Letterman > > Cisco Systems > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > hall > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:16 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228] > > > > > > I'm looking for a good hyperterminal program for linux, if anyone has any > > recommendations. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41389&t=41228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup [7:41268]
Ah, now I finally understand what you're saying. Yes, it is indeed true that, for some very odd reason, you must have some kind of TED enabled in order for TE to work in IOS. However, what you can do is create explicit paths that ignore the TED. But it is indeed the case that if you have no TED, the TE tunnels will drop, even if those tunnels do not use the TED. ""LU"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This does not work for me, that's why I posted to make sure. If I do not > enable TE extension of IGPs, the tunnel refuses to come up, if I disabled > TE-extension at the egress, the tunnel will go down. The response from > others so far pretty much confirmed this. I do not have my configs now, but > if you need I can send them when I get back to office, just to make I did > not miss config anything. > > I assume you tested this yourself and made it work, if so, could you please > share your configuration so we all, at least myself, can benefit. > > Thanks > LU > > > ""nrf"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well then the answer to your question is still yes, you can do it. I see > > that somebody on the Juniper list answered it, but I will answer it here > > too. You can set up explicit paths in your TE tunnels (tunnel mpls > > traffic-engineering path-option 1 explicit ...), and then set up a > > explicit-path. By doing so, you are creating the TE tunnels manually, so > > you do not need a TED, therefore you do not need OSPF or ISIS (or any > > routing protocol, for that matter) > > > > > > > > ""LU"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > hmm, okay here is what I was talking about, you can not set up a LSP in > > IOS > > > without enabling opaque or ISIS extensions. I did not make myself clear > > > that I was talking about TE, so LDP should not be in the picture, as you > > can > > > not reserve bandwidth with it, not till we have CR-LDP. Junos allows you > > > using no-cspf to ignore the TE-database and set up LSP just based on > > normal > > > IGP topology. > > > I just want to make sure that I did not miss some IOS commands here. > > > > > > Thanks > > > LU > > > > > > Another question about IOS LSP, what command do I use to advertise the > LSP > > > tunnel > > > ""nrf"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Uh, what are you talking about? Your question seems to be garbled. > > First > > > > of all, there are several ways to establish LSP's in IOS. If you want > > to > > > > set up LSP's using normal IGP, then just use LDP/TDP. JunOS also > allows > > > you > > > > to use LDP, or you can create LSP's manually (something that IOS > cannot > > > do). > > > > > > > > If you want to use MPLS-TE on IOS and you don't want to use opaque > > LSA's, > > > > then how about using ISIS extensions? > > > > > > > > > > > > ""LU"" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > I just noticed that in cisco you can not establish LSP without > > enabling > > > > OSPF > > > > > opaque LSA, this is quite different from Juniper. JUNOS allows you > to > > > set > > > > up > > > > > LSP just based on normal IGP information. Am I missing some commands > > in > > > > IOS? > > > > > Does IOS have a way to enable MPLS-TE without having OSPF opaque > LSA? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > LU Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41390&t=41268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228]
funny. I can think of several places within Cisco where HyperTerminal is used exclusively. ;-> ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hyper term is not on my w2k laptop..reflections is..and all of my peers > in Lan/IT use either reflections or secure-crt... > > Larry Letterman > Cisco Systems > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck" > To: > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 8:31 AM > Subject: Re: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228] > > > > ha ha ha Cisco should practice what you preach > > > > > > > > ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > the best one is not to use HT at all... > > > Get a term application that works... > > > > > > tera term, reflections, secure crt, etc.. > > > > > > > > > Larry Letterman > > > Cisco Systems > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > hall > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:16 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228] > > > > > > > > > I'm looking for a good hyperterminal program for linux, if anyone has > any > > > recommendations. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41391&t=41228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATM OC3 link utilization Monitor [7:41392]
Folks, I have a Nortel Centillion 100 ATM switch using OC3 as a connection to ISP. Could someone please let me know what the best tool is to monitor the utilization on that link? I am just trying to baseline the OC3 traffic pattern. A free tool would be nice. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41392&t=41392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Exec-timeout [7:41382]
I apologize for previous incorrect information. (timeout conn) Try this instead... Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Documentation: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/index.htm PIX Firewall Version 6.1 > Cisco PIX Firewall Command Reference show telnet timeout telnet timeout minutes (telnet timeout 5) (The number of minutes that a Telnet session can be idle before being closed by PIX Firewall. The default is 5 minutes. The range is 1 to 60 minutes.) "who" or "show who" with "kill" works manually... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41393&t=41382 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2500 boot ROM's [7:41394]
Hello, Does anyone have any *extra* of the latest boot ROM's for the 2500 series routers? I can't load 16 MB memory until I upgrade it. I know they're free from Cisco, but they said the lead time is about 3 weeks (probably more). Does anyone have any they could send me ASAP? Just thought I'd give it a try...=) Thanks, Eddie _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41394&t=41394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX Exec-timeout [7:41382]
This works fine for telnets, but doesn't affect console connections. I would like to automatically timeout a console session after x minutes. ""scott jensen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I apologize for previous incorrect information. (timeout conn) > > Try this instead... > > Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Documentation: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/index.htm > > PIX Firewall Version 6.1 > Cisco PIX Firewall Command Reference > > > show telnet timeout > > telnet timeout minutes (telnet timeout 5) > > (The number of minutes that a Telnet session can be idle before being closed > by PIX Firewall. The default is 5 minutes. The range is 1 to 60 minutes.) > > "who" or "show who" with "kill" works manually... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41395&t=41382 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263]
Any confirmation that the exam has changed to address the new objectives? I am taking this exam in 24+ hours... would like to hear feedback. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41396&t=41263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson Security Tests? (Cisco Security Specialist 1 [7:41256]
I just finished passing all 4 exams. Saying that, I would suggest that the Cisco Press MCNS book is enough to pass 3 of the 4 exams (not the CSIDS). I also purchased Boson tests for all the exams minus the CSIDS (it was not available). I used the Cisco Website info for this exam,,, and with a lot of luck, I Passed! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41397&t=41256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Exam [7:41230]
Well... if you feel confident that you can pass the foundations exam, go for it. Personally, I think taking them separately will provide you with more knowledge. However, if you know the material already, from experience, I would take the foundations exam to expedite the cert. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41398&t=41230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE [7:41399]
Dear All I just cleared my ccie written ewith over 82%. Really hard time it was. Now I am preparing for my CCIE labs. I already schduled it coming June. I am in the process of setting up a "Home lab". Have anyone got to know where the used routers are available? I am from Sydney. Reg Siva Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41399&t=41399 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP:Switching Exam !! [7:41211]
Know the MLS commands. Know the ins and outs of the different switching types (NetFlow, FIFO, Process,Silicon, distributed, fast, CEF, etc). I found this to be the easiest of the CCNP exams (I used Cisco Press books) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41400&t=41211 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSH connexions [7:41178]
Can use the port map statement if using PIX,,, what box are you trying to modify? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41401&t=41178 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Static NAT with HSRP - longish [7:41036]
I would suggest CatOS 6-3-3 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41403&t=41036 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228]
I believe the CCIE lab uses it, but inside as an employee, we can use any one of several term apps, and not many people I know are using HT Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Chuck" To: Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 5:46 PM Subject: Re: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228] > funny. I can think of several places within Cisco where HyperTerminal is > used exclusively. ;-> > > > ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > hyper term is not on my w2k laptop..reflections is..and all of my peers > > in Lan/IT use either reflections or secure-crt... > > > > Larry Letterman > > Cisco Systems > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - Original Message - > > From: "Chuck" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 8:31 AM > > Subject: Re: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228] > > > > > > > ha ha ha Cisco should practice what you preach > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > the best one is not to use HT at all... > > > > Get a term application that works... > > > > > > > > tera term, reflections, secure crt, etc.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry Letterman > > > > Cisco Systems > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > hall > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:16 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: What is the best HyperTerminal program for Linux? [7:41228] > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm looking for a good hyperterminal program for linux, if anyone has > > any > > > > recommendations. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41402&t=41228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I change Token Ring NIC's with Ethernet on the [7:41404]
What kind of Ethernet cards did you put in there? You can't put just any brand of ethernet NIC in there. ""Romeo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a PIX Firewall with IOS 4.1.4 and 2 Token Ring NIC's. I tried to > change with various Ethernet NIC's but the IOS don't recognize them. Why? I > need of another version of IOS? Has someone this kind of IOS to give me? > > Thanks, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41404&t=41404 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM OC3 link utilization Monitor [7:41392]
I'm not familiar with the Centillion, but I assume that you could use MRTG? It's free and I know plenty of people using it to monitor bandwidth. Craig At 08:59 PM 4/13/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Folks, >I have a Nortel Centillion 100 ATM switch using OC3 as a connection to ISP. >Could someone please let me know what the best tool is to monitor the >utilization on that link? >I am just trying to baseline the OC3 traffic pattern. >A free tool would be nice. >Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41405&t=41392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263]
The new objectives are posted on the Cisco web site. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 8:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263] Any confirmation that the exam has changed to address the new objectives? I am taking this exam in 24+ hours... would like to hear feedback. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41406&t=41263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4006 Power Supplies [7:41257]
I have worked with the catalyst 4006. The 4006 will still operate wiht only one power supply. I have tested it under such conditions with only one power supply, one SUP and four 48 port modules( this is considered a partial populated chasis ), I assume that on a fully populated chasis at least two power supplies would be required to run the unit. Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ccna/ccnp/ccie wannabe Jeffrey Reed wrote: > Im trying to understand power redundancy in the Cisco 4006 switch. Reading > through the online information, Cisco seems to imply you must have at least > two power supplies up and running at all times. The 3rd power supply > provides redundancy. Other vendors allow you to run at least a partially > populated chassis on one power supply. If I have a 4006 with SUPII and one > 48-port blade, do I really need three power supplies? Anyone have experience > with 4006s and power supplies? > > Thanks!! > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > Cell 717-805-5536 > Office 717-737-8586 > FAX 717-737-0290 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41407&t=41257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Memory [7:41266]
www.layer7labs.com www.kg2.com Jorge The Edward Groove wrote: > Has anyone done any research on cheaper, yet compatible memory for the > 2500 series routers? I'm looking for some cheap flash and DRAM for this > line. Does anyone have any specs--or even better--manufacturer model > names that you've tested that works? > > Thanks, in advance... > > Eddie > > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41409&t=41266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
remove passwords and login configuration on VTY 0 4 lines. Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Johnson, Richard (NY Int) wrote: > Hi All, > > How do I disable Telnetting capability to my 3640. I only want > console access. > > > Thanks, > > > Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41408&t=41293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
I'm having problem with WINS replication to 2 differ servers Server 1 in Network 1 in Phx (PDC...WINS Server) Server 2 in Network 2 in LA (BDC...WINS Server) server1.cisco2600---PPP---cisco2600.server2 The server2 can browse all machines in network 1 and 2 but server 1 cant see network 2. I have enabled the TCP ports 42 and 135 on both the routers but still no success. The network is NT 4 domain. Thanks in advance for help Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41410&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
Good answer Kevin.. Fortunately I do not spend the whole day( and most nites) surfing the web, and chatting.. Any body thats been to cisco's campus at corp. knows that.. And working in the lan/wan group at cisco almost empowers you to become a ccie because thats what we do And your dead on with the job/money issue... and I take the advice of the more knowledgeable people on this list that have been there/done that.. and Mr. Stroebel doesn't appear to be one of those... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Kevin Cullimore" To: Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 9:38 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > A few concerns: > > I'm not sure that "leeway" to "surf" & "chat" constitutes a better life/job. > That could just as easily be a sign that a position or a company is in in > trouble due to lack of business. > > More realistically, not being allowed to "surf" newsgroups on company time > means that you are denied access to solutions that are not documented > anywhere else. > > This has several consequences: > > 1. You must use their time to duplicate extant solutions. > > 2. You possibly improve your skills by independently deriving the solution. > > This does not scale well for your employer: they have to wait for you to > come up with answers that others can extract via an online search, and you > become more expensive to retain over time (rendering your case for someone > in the opposite or nearly opposite situation to be in possession of "a > better life" all the weaker). > > The "chat" case is a little more ambiguous. > > While posting to newsgroups allows you to gain valuable practice (again, a > case where you potentially further your own marketability), it does > represent instances where you are sharing knowledge outside your employer's > talent pool and are not working on revenue generating matters (note: I'm > explicitly ignoring any social networking opportunities that might emerge as > a result of such interaction). > > > > Other employers vary widely concerning these issues. > > I'm not sure encouraging a technically-oriented Cisco employee to forego > pursuit of a CCIE certification holds up as valid (impartial) advice. > > As far as income/job/life goes, I'm not sure that any software/hardware > provider is safe from having their business eroded by their own increasing > efficiency or the efforts by competitors to leapfrog their current set of > capabilities. The entire world is banding together to reduce IT salaries, > and the success of those efforts would reduce both the overall quality and > achievable salaries of the remaining jobs (caveat: some jobs would certainly > remain interesting or possibly grow more appealing, but the number of > positions available for those roles would probably shrink). > > Finally, I'm not sure that a company that routinely trims 5% during > unimaginably good times is the right one to passively cling on to as > suggested in your "Forget CCIE and hold on to your good Cisco Systems > employer" suggestion. > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:45 PM > Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > > > Larry, > > > > Well, it did work for me and as you see I am going for the lab now. > > Of course, ccbootcamp, Boson, cerificationzone these are all just tools. > The > > actual result varies depending on the person's capacity. > > > > But, I am curious. Why do you want to become a CCIE? > > > > I want to become a CCIE with the hope and anticipation of a better job, a > > better income, and a better life. > > You already have a better life. Your signature says you work for Cisco, > and > > you > > are constantly on this list. This means you are getting paid for surfing > and > > chatting! This is an ultimate job. I love it. > > > > I don't believe any other employer would give you so much leway even if > you > > were holding a PhD in brainsurgery. Where I work, we are not allowd to > surf > > the > > web and participate in newsgroups when we are on the clock > > > > > Forget CCIE and hold on to your good Cisco Systems employer, and shoot me > an > > application form if they are hiring :-) > > > > Best wishes, > > > > A Strobel (working on the lab exam) > > > > > > > > Quoting Larry Letterman : > > > > > Bernard's test does not work well, I would advise > > > using dennis L.'s boson # 3 test. Its a better test for > > > written. > > > > > > > > > Larry Letterman > > > Cisco Systems > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:20 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > > > > > > > > Kris, > > > > > > I am sure you will find tons of info on this subject in archives. > > > Strategies are different from person to person. > > > I used the followi
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
Phil is pretty much correct, altho we wont do layoffs..we are not replacing any body that leaves or does not make it on the performance issues... Personally I still think the company is the one of the better places to be if you love networking and tech, but to each his own Phil is also right about the pay, the companies that you really like to be in don't pay the highest salary. The supply and demand issue always works for them, since there is no shortage of people that want to work for those type of companies... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Circusnuts_1999" To: Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:54 AM Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > No offense Strobel, but I know of no Cisco employee that 1) thinks he or > she isn't more than one quarter of bad stock reporting away from losing > their job 2) thinks Cisco is the panacea of employers (the millionaire > stock guys/ gals have left and those left are eating sour grapes because > they couldn't vested in time) 3) most positions within Cisco (namely the > CCIE billets) don't generally pay the upper end of scale, unless you're > lucky enough to be on a sales account with say someone the size of Time > Warner/ AOL. > > Just my experience- having worked with current and former Cisco > employees... > > Please don't get me wrong, logically it would seem Cisco Corporate is > the way to go... > > All the best !!! > Phil > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > Larry, > > Well, it did work for me and as you see I am going for the lab now. > Of course, ccbootcamp, Boson, cerificationzone these are all just tools. > The > actual result varies depending on the person's capacity. > > But, I am curious. Why do you want to become a CCIE? > > I want to become a CCIE with the hope and anticipation of a better job, > a > better income, and a better life. > You already have a better life. Your signature says you work for Cisco, > and > you > are constantly on this list. This means you are getting paid for surfing > and > chatting! This is an ultimate job. I love it. > > I don't believe any other employer would give you so much leway even if > you > were holding a PhD in brainsurgery. Where I work, we are not allowd to > surf > the > web and participate in newsgroups when we are on the clock :-( > > Forget CCIE and hold on to your good Cisco Systems employer, and shoot > me an > application form if they are hiring :-) > > Best wishes, > > A Strobel (working on the lab exam) > > > > Quoting Larry Letterman : > > > Bernard's test does not work well, I would advise > > using dennis L.'s boson # 3 test. Its a better test for > > written. > > > > > > Larry Letterman > > Cisco Systems > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:20 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > > > > > Kris, > > > > I am sure you will find tons of info on this subject in archives. > > Strategies are different from person to person. > > I used the following to pass my written: > > > > -Bruce Caslow's Book (1st or 2nd edition) > > -Boson #1 by Bernard > > -CCO > > > > You can add www.certificationzone.com to your arsenal if you are an > avid > > reader. They have excellent white papers. > > > > During the period that you wait and practice for you lab, you can > read: > > Halabi > > Jeff Doyle (1 &2) > > BGP-4 by parkhurst > > and many more. > > > > Good luck, > > A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) > > > > > > > > Quoting Kris Keen : > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I'll be preparing for the CCIE written exam very shortly, Im in the > > process > > > of building the tid bits for my lab and collecting the reading > material.. > > > > > > What books should I read at a min, and what would be even more > > advantgeous? > > > > > > I have all the CCNP books (Exam Cert Guides) and Doyles TCPIP Vol 1. > > > > > > Please help... > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Kris > > -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- > > This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ > -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- > This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41386&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Exec-timeout [7:41382]
command syntax: timeout [conn [hh:mm:ss]] [h323 [hh:mm:ss]] [rpc [hh:mm:ss]] [uauth [hh:mm:ss]] [udp [hh:mm:ss]] [xlate [hh:mm:ss]] conn hh:mm:ss Idle time until a connection slot is freed (default value is 12 hours). Use 0:0:0 for the time value to never time out a connection. Manually: kill telnet_id Telnet session ID. Use "show who" to display Telnet session IDs. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41387&t=41382 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
I'm sure someone can provide a more detailed and accurate answer, but hopefully I can help. WINS is a TCP and UDP protocol. I imagine an IP HELPER-ADDRESS command might be of use here. Try a search for WINS on CCO at www.cisco.com. hth, Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mayo, Simer Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm having problem with WINS replication to 2 differ servers Server 1 in Network 1 in Phx (PDC...WINS Server) Server 2 in Network 2 in LA (BDC...WINS Server) server1.cisco2600---PPP---cisco2600.server2 The server2 can browse all machines in network 1 and 2 but server 1 cant see network 2. I have enabled the TCP ports 42 and 135 on both the routers but still no success. The network is NT 4 domain. Thanks in advance for help Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41411&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
Ip-helper addresses entries probably won't help in your scenario, they are used with boradcast services such as DHCP. Try adding a static entry in the LMHOST file on server pointing to server 2 with the #PRE and #DOM attributes and use nbtstat -R to reload the netbios cache on server 1 after you add this to its LMHOST file. This should work HTH, Don Nguyen Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41412&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2500 won't boot...any ideas? [7:41414]
my 2511 was working fine a few days ago with--i believe--11.0xx software. i created a configuration and saved it. yesterday, i upgraded the RAM so that i could load 12.2xx. the router won't fully boot up, and it never goes into the config or into rommon. i don't get it. again, it was working a few days ago. unfortunately, i can't put the old chips back in b/c i overwrote them already--ugh. i loaded up 12.2.7 onto the flash via another router and tried to boot it up again in the 2522... here's the output from when i start up the router, to where it hangs... System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 12.0 may not be correctly understood. F3: 14576440+958356+908736 at 0x360 Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.2(7b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 05-Mar-02 05:10 by pwade Image text-base: 0x030794BC, data-base: 0x1000 cisco 2511 (68030) processor (revision M) with 14336K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 17604021, with hardware revision Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). TN3270 Emulation software. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 16 terminal line(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY) 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to down 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:00:27: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down 00:00:34: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial0, changed state to administratively down 00:00:35: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console 00:00:35: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial1, changed state to administratively down 00:00:35: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down 00:00:38: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:01:18: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.2(7b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 05-Mar-02 05:10 by pwade 00:01:18: %SNMP-5-COLDSTART: SNMP agent on host Terminal_Server is undergoing a cold start _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41414&t=41414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
How much are the beta exams ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41415&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
Incorrectly I said WINS is a TCP and UDP protocol - I was thinking of netbios. WINS is just TCP. Sean -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 11:13 PM To: 'Mayo, Simer'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm sure someone can provide a more detailed and accurate answer, but hopefully I can help. WINS is a TCP and UDP protocol. I imagine an IP HELPER-ADDRESS command might be of use here. Try a search for WINS on CCO at www.cisco.com. hth, Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mayo, Simer Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm having problem with WINS replication to 2 differ servers Server 1 in Network 1 in Phx (PDC...WINS Server) Server 2 in Network 2 in LA (BDC...WINS Server) server1.cisco2600---PPP---cisco2600.server2 The server2 can browse all machines in network 1 and 2 but server 1 cant see network 2. I have enabled the TCP ports 42 and 135 on both the routers but still no success. The network is NT 4 domain. Thanks in advance for help Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41417&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
