PIX Firewall [7:46423]
Does anyone know of a way to clear or tear-down individual connections on a PIX Firewall? By using the show conn command I can see the connections I want to clear but don't now how to. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46423t=46423 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raees /Mumbai [7:46424]
Dear Friends, I am a CCIE candidate currently in Mumbai, Looking for some friends ofcourse CISCO PROS to come together and form a study group. If there is any group of such kind already there, I would love to join it. Pls reply in personal to my direct email add. Shaikh Raees CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP, CCIE Written. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46424t=46424 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How the RTD affect the web performance? [7:46425]
Hi , I have a WAN connection my branch in Sydney to the head office in London. I need to access the web page that located in London web server. Normally, I feel the access is very slow when the link is congested. It is a 256K link. But now when I feel the access is very slow too but the link is not congested with only 25% utilization. But, I found the round trip time to London increase from 200ms to 440ms. How does it affect the performance And I checked with the provider, they said the main undersea link is having problem, we are on alternate path now. I suspect is that because the undersea cable utilization is very congested, so the provider only allocated small bandwidth to us. Is that possible? How to determine?? Will provider cheat us on leased line bandwidth or the RTD affect a low on performance? _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46425t=46425 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Parity errors and Cosmic radiation! [7:46282]
Digging a hole might not be such a good idea. According to an IBM article, they claim that radon gas can also produce the problem. So I guess you shouldn't put equipment in the basement either. http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/401/curtis.html - Original Message - From: Frank Merrill To: Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:54 PM Subject: RE: Parity errors and Cosmic radiation! [7:46282] I read the link referenced at the bottom of the page and it was quite interesting. If you missed it, here it is again: http://www.eetimes.com/news/98/1012news/ibm.html After reading that, I guess you'll be digging a hole to put the router in! ;-) Good Luck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46426t=46282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company, was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the 5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a good machine and I like it. Of course I like Foundry's ServerIrons too but for a Cisco Switch, I really do like the 65xx. IDS is only part of the problem. The 65xx uses modules. I thought for sure Cisco would want engineers to know about how to configure the modules not only because it increases the value of the engineer but more importantly, it is useful in marketing and sales. Don't you want to promote the modules on the 65xxx They are really expensive and Cisco must make some good money off of them. The 3550 is what? Perhaps we can all buy one, I just saw 4 on e-bay, each for under $3000, but doesn't Cisco want to test us off of what many enterprises are using? I was at a Cisco Gold Partner company last year and they only recommended the 5xxx and then the 65xx. Of course many customers bought the 29xx but on the test there was the 5xxx-a modular switch. It just doesn't make sense. It looks too easy. But hey! It's your company! Of course it will be beneficial to me as a test-taker to have the 3550. I am just at a loss as to why Cisco is not putting the replacement switch on the test. Your commments Theo Larry Letterman 06/13/2002 02:33 PM To: , cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] and why are you so distraught about no IDS..? other than the fact we all know your big on security. Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching part of the R/S lab, not the security lab... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I don't know about this thing. What is the real throughput I wonder. It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a place where is says X Gbbs throughput Has anyone really ever tested one of these puppies? I would like to know if it can really take a beating without losing packets. And this thing can't do IDS! Why O why did they choose this thing? How about the Content Swiching Module? Does it have anything like this? I am looking at the page now and can't see anything promising. Man was someone sniffing acid when they suggested the switch and it wasn't IDS??? I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this with like 10 1-gig copper connections, all intensive traffic flows between various servers. I know the 6509 can take the pain without too much trouble. Can the 3550 really perform Theo Mark Odette II Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 12:14 PM Please respond to Mark Odette II To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] The 3550 running the Enhanced image of IOS is a layer 3 switch with 24 or 48 ports- No need for a Route Module add-on. You can put an IP on every single port too from what I understand. It more or less can do the same thing as a 6500 - minus any Tel-Co blades that might be able to be put in the 6500. Of course, I don't have any experience with the 6500 series switch, so I don't know what all you can put in it. :( Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] Dream of many 3550s.. Question: Maybe I am an Idiot or something but why are they using the 3550? I just don't understand. I thought they shoud use the 6506 or something like that not a lower model. Can someone clarify this point for me. Theo Steven A. Ridder Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 11:00 AM Please respond to Steven A. Ridder To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I'm an idiot. I see someone else already posted it. I'm going to bed then. Steve Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Right from Cisco's mouth: NO MORE IPX, TOKEN RING, OR CatOS! CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical content and equipment in the lab exam. Effective October 1st, 2002, candidates will no longer be tested in the areas of IGRP, Token Ring, Token Ring Switching, or IPX. Note: DLSW+ will remain as a protocol that can be tested in the lab. The Catalyst 5500 switch will be replaced with the Catalyst 3550. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#1 8 -- RFC 1149 Compliant Message Posted at:
Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
I agree! I am confused on the issue. I ordered the GBIC-SX for the 6509 but was worried about the difference between it and the WS-X5484. What is the difference?? I can't find any information saying concretely that there is a difference. Theo Chuck Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 02:22 PM Please respond to Chuck To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395] on a completely different topic, are the GBIC-SX and the WS-X5484 different names for the same identical piece of equipment? If so, where on CCO does it say so? If not, then why not use a single part number? I ask because there seems to be a difference of opinion, with some folks at Cisco saying absolutely they are different and not interchangeable, and some folks not at Cisco, but with beau coup field experience saying there is no difference whatsoever and the parts are exchangeable problem free. just wondering where a guy goes to get The Truth ;- Larry Letterman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... you apparently dont need the token or cat switch anymore if you are taking the lab after october... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunt Lee Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46428t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serial no MAC [7:46429]
When there is no MAC address on serial interface, how the packets are routing ? Stanzin [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46429t=46429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
you have some good points However we have 35 + buildings in our campus and I have almost as many 3500xls as I do 6509's in my IDF/BDF/Labs. 6500 switches will only prepare you for enterprise work, and we sell alot of small systems as well to medium business's. My opinion is if I know vlans and switching, I can setup a 6500 as easy as a 3500... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company, was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the 5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a good machine and I like it. Of course I like Foundry's ServerIrons too but for a Cisco Switch, I really do like the 65xx. IDS is only part of the problem. The 65xx uses modules. I thought for sure Cisco would want engineers to know about how to configure the modules not only because it increases the value of the engineer but more importantly, it is useful in marketing and sales. Don't you want to promote the modules on the 65xxx They are really expensive and Cisco must make some good money off of them. The 3550 is what? Perhaps we can all buy one, I just saw 4 on e-bay, each for under $3000, but doesn't Cisco want to test us off of what many enterprises are using? I was at a Cisco Gold Partner company last year and they only recommended the 5xxx and then the 65xx. Of course many customers bought the 29xx but on the test there was the 5xxx-a modular switch. It just doesn't make sense. It looks too easy. But hey! It's your company! Of course it will be beneficial to me as a test-taker to have the 3550. I am just at a loss as to why Cisco is not putting the replacement switch on the test. Your commments Theo Larry Letterman 06/13/2002 02:33 PM To: , cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] and why are you so distraught about no IDS..? other than the fact we all know your big on security. Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching part of the R/S lab, not the security lab... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I don't know about this thing. What is the real throughput I wonder. It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a place where is says X Gbbs throughput Has anyone really ever tested one of these puppies? I would like to know if it can really take a beating without losing packets. And this thing can't do IDS! Why O why did they choose this thing? How about the Content Swiching Module? Does it have anything like this? I am looking at the page now and can't see anything promising. Man was someone sniffing acid when they suggested the switch and it wasn't IDS??? I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this with like 10 1-gig copper connections, all intensive traffic flows between various servers. I know the 6509 can take the pain without too much trouble. Can the 3550 really perform Theo Mark Odette II Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 12:14 PM Please respond to Mark Odette II To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] The 3550 running the Enhanced image of IOS is a layer 3 switch with 24 or 48 ports- No need for a Route Module add-on. You can put an IP on every single port too from what I understand. It more or less can do the same thing as a 6500 - minus any Tel-Co blades that might be able to be put in the 6500. Of course, I don't have any experience with the 6500 series switch, so I don't know what all you can put in it. :( Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] Dream of many 3550s.. Question: Maybe I am an Idiot or something but why are they using the 3550? I just don't understand. I thought they shoud use the 6506 or something like that not a lower model. Can someone clarify this point for me. Theo Steven A. Ridder Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 11:00 AM Please respond to Steven A. Ridder To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I'm an idiot. I see someone else already posted it. I'm going to bed then. Steve Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
why my PIX admin don't control outgoing traffic? [7:46432]
I have a PIX firewall sitting between market data segment and my LAN. The PIX outside interface is facing to market data segment and inside interface facing LAN. By default, the outgoing traffic from LAN to the market data segment are permitted. And incoming traffic from market data segment to LAN is blocked. I have some market data application for eg open Bloomberg and Reuters and need to access market data segment. You are informed that only connection need to initiated from inside LAN to market data segment. So, my PIX firewall admin had decide to leave to the configuration as default-- permit outgoing and block incoming. But I doubted that whether this is the way it supposed to be? Shouldn!t we just open the ports to let the necessary traffic to go out and blocked other ports? Will it creates security holes if we don't control the outgoing traffic? What is the possible attack? _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46432t=46432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX Firewall [7:46423]
Hi Tim use clear xlate command. fahim Tim Champion wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anyone know of a way to clear or tear-down individual connections on a PIX Firewall? By using the show conn command I can see the connections I want to clear but don't now how to. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46431t=46423 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help needed(bandwith) [7:46434]
Hi group, we have a customer to which we r providing bandwith on ethernet through lan extender.Now i have to restrict him on 32 kbps bandwidth on ethernet.we have cisco 2610 router so i cannot implement ratelimit on my ethernet because all of our traffic goes throuh ethernet .So can somebody help me .How can i restrict user to 32kbps on ether on router lan interface.I have tried sub int of ethernet But no Luck Plz help me Thanx in advance kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46434t=46434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP 640-603 [7:46328]
Ashish, Meaning no disrespect, I am sure that you would agree with me when I say, memorizing a command is different to doing it on router/switch. If a question asked: Configure Ether0 on a router with the following address 172.22.22.2/23, what would the command be (a) (config-if)# ip address 172.22.22.2 255.255.255.0 (b) (config-if) ip address 172.22.22.2 255.255.254.0 (c) (config-if)# ip address 172.22.22.2 255.255.254.0 (d) (config-if)# ip address 172.22.22.2 255.255.254.0 secondary (e) (config-if)# ip address 172.22.22.2 255.255.0.0 With the normal MCQ type question, most would choose (C) and be done with it. This is because they remembered the command syntax for configuring an ip address on an interface. However, if you are now told to physically (logically?) do it, a candidate would now have to come to grips as to how a router/switch works with the related gotcha's Simulation type scenario # int e0 (config-if)# ip address 172.22.22.2 255.255.254.0 (Now we even have to figure out what the SN Mask is .. no tips ala MCQ options) But most newbies / memorizers / people without experience would forget to the do second part of this I'm sure you know what it is. And that is why they are better in my opinion. You do have a 'lab' - it's just virtual :) It will help sort the wheat from the chaff. And that's my two cents Manish -Original Message- From: Ashish Nigam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 June 2002 23:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP 640-603 [7:46328] well, CCNP does not have lab exam in it.So no matter what questions u put in the exam, u cannot avoid those people who take exam without any lab experience.U can always read ,understand concepts, memorize commands and read some scenarios. There's no need to actually work on cisco boxes. CCNP should have lab exam as part of the certification if we totally want to remove the concept of Paper CCNP's even if not as exhaustive as in CCIE. - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 5:19 AM Subject: RE: CCNP 640-603 [7:46328] Hi Amir, Just remember that the exam format has changed but the material on which you are going to be tested has not. If you have experience with routing / etc you should have no problem writing the exam, it could actually be easier. I am sure most would agree with me when I say this, but I think the new Cisco exams are definitely a step in the right direction. After all, they are now a bit more real world based. It would help get eliminate some of the Paper CCNP's that we see. This is a proactive decision on Cisco's part I think to negate the MCSE syndrome as I like to call it. BTW I consider myself a bit of a Paper CCNP. I personally am looking forward to writing CIT next week in the new format to complete my CCNP. My view, of course, could change on my result on that exam. Good luck Manish Hira ___ Manish Hira () Network Administrator Servier Laboratories SA (Pty) Ltd -Original Message- From: Amir Tahir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 June 2002 09:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP 640-603 [7:46328] HI!! I need an advise for CCNP exam 640-603 as it just changed. I m going to write routing exam by next week. I'll be thankful to all of you for any +ve feedback Regards Amir Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46435t=46328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: help needed(bandwith) [7:46434]
You can ratelimit his mac address. O -- RFC 1149 Compliant. kaushalender wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi group, we have a customer to which we r providing bandwith on ethernet through lan extender.Now i have to restrict him on 32 kbps bandwidth on ethernet.we have cisco 2610 router so i cannot implement ratelimit on my ethernet because all of our traffic goes throuh ethernet .So can somebody help me .How can i restrict user to 32kbps on ether on router lan interface.I have tried sub int of ethernet But no Luck Plz help me Thanx in advance kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46436t=46434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not only is TR going... [7:46391]
Theo, By no means is the 3550 replacing the 6500 in a real world scenario. The 3550 is an IDF non-chassis switch. The most density you can get is 48 10/100 ports. However, the IOS structure and layer 3 capabilities allow you to mimic a lot of the new functionality that you have in the 6500. This will allow the CCIE lab to contain new technologies such as Private VLANS, QoS, STP enhancements, Voice VLANS, etc... This also gives way to the future of the 6500 running native IOS. So, if you are an expert on the 3550, chance are that you will know your way around a 6500 pretty well. Tim CCIE 9015 p.s. Think of the cost of outfitting the 9 CCIE labs with new 6506's. With RTP having something like 14 racks, I will use 10 as an average since I have no idea what the other labs have. A simple config on a 6506 with a Sup2-MSFC2, a WS-X6348-RJ45V, the necessary software and memory comes to $71,000 list price * 90 units = $6,390,000.00! They could throw in a WS-C3550-24-EMI for a list price of $4,990.00 and come out with a total of $449,100 with a similar feature set. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company, was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the 5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a good machine and I like it. Of course I like Foundry's ServerIrons too but for a Cisco Switch, I really do like the 65xx. IDS is only part of the problem. The 65xx uses modules. I thought for sure Cisco would want engineers to know about how to configure the modules not only because it increases the value of the engineer but more importantly, it is useful in marketing and sales. Don't you want to promote the modules on the 65xxx They are really expensive and Cisco must make some good money off of them. The 3550 is what? Perhaps we can all buy one, I just saw 4 on e-bay, each for under $3000, but doesn't Cisco want to test us off of what many enterprises are using? I was at a Cisco Gold Partner company last year and they only recommended the 5xxx and then the 65xx. Of course many customers bought the 29xx but on the test there was the 5xxx-a modular switch. It just doesn't make sense. It looks too easy. But hey! It's your company! Of course it will be beneficial to me as a test-taker to have the 3550. I am just at a loss as to why Cisco is not putting the replacement switch on the test. Your commments Theo Larry Letterman 06/13/2002 02:33 PM To: , cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] and why are you so distraught about no IDS..? other than the fact we all know your big on security. Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching part of the R/S lab, not the security lab... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I don't know about this thing. What is the real throughput I wonder. It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a place where is says X Gbbs throughput Has anyone really ever tested one of these puppies? I would like to know if it can really take a beating without losing packets. And this thing can't do IDS! Why O why did they choose this thing? How about the Content Swiching Module? Does it have anything like this? I am looking at the page now and can't see anything promising. Man was someone sniffing acid when they suggested the switch and it wasn't IDS??? I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this with like 10 1-gig copper connections, all intensive traffic flows between various servers. I know the 6509 can take the pain without too much trouble. Can the 3550 really perform Theo Mark Odette II Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 12:14 PM Please respond to Mark Odette II To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] The 3550 running the Enhanced image of IOS is a layer 3 switch with 24 or 48 ports- No need for a Route Module add-on. You can put an IP on every single port too from what I understand. It more or less can do the same thing as a 6500 - minus any Tel-Co blades that might be able to be put in the 6500. Of course, I don't have any experience with the 6500 series switch, so I don't know what all you can put in it. :( Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
Re: Serial no MAC [7:46429]
point-to-point, so no mac is needed. There is only one recepient. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Stanzin Takpa wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... When there is no MAC address on serial interface, how the packets are routing ? Stanzin [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46437t=46429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passing Mark for CVOICE (9E0-423) exam [7:46438]
Hi, Does anyone know what's the passing mark for CVOICE 9E0-423 exam? cheers! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46438t=46438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5-4-3 rule segment definition for 10BaseT [7:46439]
Hi all, I am unable to find from the archive the discussion on the 5-4-3 rule. What is the definition of a segment for 10BaseT? How can I apply the 5-4-3 rule in a 10BaseT network? I attended a Novell class a few years back and was taught that in the 10BaseT network, it makes use of a modified 5-4-3 rule, that is 5-4 rule. Can someone confirm if this is correct or otherwise. Thanks, cheekin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46439t=46439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN problem from Pix to VPN concentrator 3030 [7:46343]
I don't have both the isakmp statements in my PIX, why do I need it on both interfaces when the crypto map is on only the outside? Also I have two other PIX working OK with the only the one statement Cheers Pat -- email me on : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brunner Joseph wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... on the 3030 make sure you are manually specifying lan to lan (Local Network and Remote Network) using USE IP ADDRESS/WILDCARD MASK BELOW). While you normally don't have to do this (you can autodiscover) Just do it to test if this is the problem. Also make sure you have both isakmp enable outside isakmp enable inside yes i mean both. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46440t=46343 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: help needed(bandwith) [7:46434]
Give him a modem.. Does he have one IP address? I believe you should be able to rate limit that one address. Just setup your access list for his address or range... Just a guess. don - Original Message - From: kaushalender To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:08 AM Subject: help needed(bandwith) [7:46434] Hi group, we have a customer to which we r providing bandwith on ethernet through lan extender.Now i have to restrict him on 32 kbps bandwidth on ethernet.we have cisco 2610 router so i cannot implement ratelimit on my ethernet because all of our traffic goes throuh ethernet .So can somebody help me .How can i restrict user to 32kbps on ether on router lan interface.I have tried sub int of ethernet But no Luck Plz help me Thanx in advance kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46441t=46434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
Hi, Could you explain a bit more what happen after October ? Thanks Philip - Original Message - Wrom: IYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKED To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] you apparently dont need the token or cat switch anymore if you are taking the lab after october... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Wrom: OTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJ Hunt Lee Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46442t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
YES, please do explain what happens after October. Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, Could you explain a bit more what happen after October ? Thanks Philip - Original Message - Wrom: IYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKED To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] you apparently dont need the token or cat switch anymore if you are taking the lab after october... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Wrom: OTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJ Hunt Lee Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46443t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: why my PIX admin don't control outgoing traffic? [7:46432]
Are you saying that you need your Bloomberg behind the Pix to communicate? Then yes, you will need to create static maps to those pc's and open ports for Bloomberg to those pc's. I would say open them only to Bloombergs and Reuters. Bloomberg actually has a paper on doing internet connections that you will need to get from your sales or service rep. It's simple and works. Steve smith -Original Message- From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: why my PIX admin don't control outgoing traffic? [7:46432] I have a PIX firewall sitting between market data segment and my LAN. The PIX outside interface is facing to market data segment and inside interface facing LAN. By default, the outgoing traffic from LAN to the market data segment are permitted. And incoming traffic from market data segment to LAN is blocked. I have some market data application for eg open Bloomberg and Reuters and need to access market data segment. You are informed that only connection need to initiated from inside LAN to market data segment. So, my PIX firewall admin had decide to leave to the configuration as default-- permit outgoing and block incoming. But I doubted that whether this is the way it supposed to be? Shouldn!t we just open the ports to let the necessary traffic to go out and blocked other ports? Will it creates security holes if we don't control the outgoing traffic? What is the possible attack? _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46444t=46432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
End of CCIE Written [7:46445]
Hello Group, I have received an email from Cisco that the current CCIE exam will retire between July 15 and July 30. Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46445t=46445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Works 2000 [7:46446]
I've just started to use CW2000 after it had been installed by a colleague. I have a Sun workstation and Netscape 4.78, the problem I have is that Netscape doesn't display all the frames sometimes or the data in a page. I do have a Windows machine and it does display the pages but very slowly. What do other people use with CW2000?? Cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46446t=46446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How the RTD affect the web performance? [7:46425]
At 2:59 AM -0400 6/13/02, Kenny Smith wrote: Hi , I have a WAN connection my branch in Sydney to the head office in London. I need to access the web page that located in London web server. Normally, I feel the access is very slow when the link is congested. It is a 256K link. Is this formally a dedicated line (fractional E1/T1), or is it frame relay? If it's a true leased line, you should have the bandwidth. But now when I feel the access is very slow too but the link is not congested with only 25% utilization. But, I found the round trip time to London increase from 200ms to 440ms. How does it affect the performance And I checked with the provider, they said the main undersea link is having problem, we are on alternate path now. This is possible. Most of the newer undersea cable installations go in as 4-site SONET rings. Hypothetically, you might be on a ring Sydney-Singapore-Los Angeles-San Francisco. If the Sydney-LA link is the one you normally use, you may be going Singapore-San Francisco, with longer delay. Better longer delay than infinite delay! I suspect is that because the undersea cable utilization is very congested, so the provider only allocated small bandwidth to us. Is that possible? How to determine?? Will provider cheat us on leased line bandwidth or the RTD affect a low on performance? Start by asking them, including a request to see the data circuit layout. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46447t=46425 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serial no MAC [7:46429]
I would like to revise and extend your answer. :-) A serial interface is not *always* point-to-point. The answer actually depends on the Layer 2 protocol you are using. If you are using Frame-relay, you have a DLCI mapped to the IP address. On ATM you have a VPI/VCI combo. On point-to-point (PPP, etc...) the router, as Steven said, doesn't need a hardware address, since it is just sending and recieving on the interface where there is only one possible recipient, so the router only needs to know that the destination is out a specific p-t-p serial interface. -Tim Steven A. Ridder wrote: point-to-point, so no mac is needed. There is only one recepient. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Stanzin Takpa wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... When there is no MAC address on serial interface, how the packets are routing ? Stanzin [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46448t=46429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Hunt for Peter Rosenthal [7:46449]
Some people have been asking me about the hunt for Peter Rosenthal (sounds like a Tom Clancy novel :-).. If you recall last month someone posting as Peter Rosenthal was making derogatory comments about various people on the list, GroupStudy.com, and the CCIE Lab program itself. From the beginning I knew this was an alias and a coward was hiding behind the real address. I am working with AOL (where the majority of the e-mails were posted) to obtain the real name behind the sender. While they are cooperative, there are a number of legal steps I need to take in order to obtain the name. But the sender did make a mistake allowing us to close in on the sender. On May 2nd a Peter Rosenthal posting was made from the IP address 216.45.3.175 to the CCIE Lab list. You can verify this by viewing the header of the e-mail. If you do a whois from www.arin.net you will find the block is owned by Network Learning Inc. NLI is unable to tell us who was using that IP address as they do not keep those records - they did say a class was in session during that week. Since the posting was made from a Network Learning Inc. assigned IP address - it is reasonable to believe the poster had access to NLI's network. It has to be someone who has access to Network Learning Inc's network and has an AOL account. I am just now gathering up the last bit of information for AOL. We should have an answer soon. So that is currently where we stand. Take care, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46449t=46449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Parity errors and Cosmic radiation! [7:46282]
This is what TAC will most often referance when you experience a parity error: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/122/crashes_pmpe.html Dave R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: I have a client who experienced this as well on a pair of 7206VXR's. The two routers rebooted themselves due to memory parity error. The cosmic radiation was kind enough to cause the reload in the wee hours so no harm done. What's weird is that we have six 7206's in the same cabinet but only two experienced the problem. The two afflicted routers just happened to service the same group of subnets (HSRP peers)...kinda strange. TAC dude wanted me to remove and re-seat the memory in the routers. He said that if the problem happened again that they'd replace the memory. I opened up one of the routers to find that the memory is not only secured by retaining clips on each side but it also has a screw through it...I didn't bother on the other router. (knocking on wood) It has been several months since that happened and we've run clean since. If you're seeing this on a brand-new box, I'd guess infant mortality. Perhaps you can convince TAC to send you some new memory if you're still fighting this problem. If new memory still has the problem then you'll need to look at environmental conditions in your data center - e.g. grounding, heat, a lot of EMI, etc. Farooq Ali wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all: I am a giga-lurker on this list and over the past 3 years have benefitted a lot. Have been able to achieve a lot due to the knowledge shared on this list. I would like to thank all for that. The reason I am writing now is an issue which is a bit mind boggeling. We do have a solution but I found it a bit funny hence sharing it here. One of our offsite routers a 7206 vxr in New York site was having a problem, we had this brand new router crash on us twice in a week and after opening a ticket with TAC, we sent them an upload of our sh tech output. They told us that we have parity issues and guess what? the parity is bad cause of Cosmic radiation! I am taking the solution on face value and not making a fuss about it, but wanted to hear from the more experianced folks on this list on how does minimal radiation is able to set the 0 to 1 or viceversa, while my router is not located in say Alpha quadrant in subnebular terrain. Its in NYC! :) here is a link to this phenomena on cisco site: http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:xbNsvjHnXUIC:www.cisco.com/warp/pub lic/ 122/crashes_pmpe.html+soft+parity+errors+and+cosmic+radiationhl=en Any ideas! Kfali CCNP security, afraid of the written. -- ___ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Email.com http://www.email.com/?sr=signup -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46450t=46282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is the best Router for the following tasks [7:46288]
We have one we are beta testing some stuff with. I really like the fact that it has an internal PS and you can rack mount it. Other than that and an additional VIC slot it's not much differant than a 1751. Dave R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: Look at the new 1700's (I think it's called 1760 or 1761) - they've got a 1U rack form factor. I haven't laid hands on one yet but it looks promising. It's only got one 10/100 Ethernet built-in but you can add a 10mb Ethernet via a WIC. Obviously you'd need another WIC for the serial I don't know how much punishment the CPU on these routers can take - thinking about QoS, Firewall, IPsec, NAT, etc. Anyone work on one of these yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Kaberna Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: which is the best Router for the following tasks [7:46288] 2611 if you want Ethernet and 2621 if you want Fast Ethernet. I generally don't like to work with anything under a 2600. You can also look at the 1751. The problem with the 17XX series is they aren't rack mountable. Fab Perez wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi news I need to pickup a Router with the following features: _ 2 Ethernets _ 1 V.35 Serial / Sync _ QoS _ Load Balancing (EIGRP ?) _ NAT _ Firewall Thanks in advance. -- Fab Perez .net .admin www.inet.co.cr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46451t=46288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
Have a look at the link from Cisco. They will be removing Token Ring and the 3920 Switch and replacing the 5500's with 3550's which can do layer 3 and other new advanced features. Tim CCIE 9015 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, Could you explain a bit more what happen after October ? Thanks Philip - Original Message - Wrom: IYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKED To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] you apparently dont need the token or cat switch anymore if you are taking the lab after october... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Wrom: OTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJ Hunt Lee Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46452t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX 6.2 [7:46454]
Howdy, Dows anyone know if the PIX 6.2 software is available yet? Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46454t=46454 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: End of CCIE Written [7:46445]
after that what will they be revising the syllabus, or new exam format ? or what after that.. Murali -Original Message- From: Reza To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6/13/02 4:56 PM Subject: End of CCIE Written [7:46445] Hello Group, I have received an email from Cisco that the current CCIE exam will retire between July 15 and July 30. Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46456t=46445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: End of CCIE Written [7:46445]
New exam format. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... after that what will they be revising the syllabus, or new exam format ? or what after that.. Murali -Original Message- From: Reza To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6/13/02 4:56 PM Subject: End of CCIE Written [7:46445] Hello Group, I have received an email from Cisco that the current CCIE exam will retire between July 15 and July 30. Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46457t=46445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
There's a couple of threads running about it right now on the group. Basically Cisco has announced Token Ring, IPX and a few other things are gone from the lab in October. Like I say, review some of the other current threads and you'll see more detail... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Walker, Jim To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:34 AM Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] YES, please do explain what happens after October. Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, Could you explain a bit more what happen after October ? Thanks Philip - Original Message - Wrom: IYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKED To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] you apparently dont need the token or cat switch anymore if you are taking the lab after october... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Wrom: OTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJ Hunt Lee Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46459t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pix don't route [7:46356]
That assumes that he has an address space to announce via BGP, which I he did not mention so I assumed he did not have one. Without your own address space, BGP isn't going to do anything for you. Yes, if the T1 goes down, the servers would be unreachable, but without your own address space and/or running your own DNS and doing some NAT magic with the replies to DNS queries, you won't be able to give the correct DNS answer. (i.e. return the T1 IP when the T1 is up, return the DSL address when the T1 is down) Since all the replies from the servers would go out the T1, if a query for the server came in the DSL the conversation would break when the server traffic went out the T1 and got translated to the IP address on that interface. This assumes using PAT on each router interface. Obviously, if the OP has his own address space, the scenario changes considerably and there are more options. -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Kaberna Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pix don't route [7:46356] What happens when the T1 provider goes down? Those IP's will no longer be reachable and the servers will be down. Without BGP I don't see how you are going to get the DSL circuit to take over the IP's that the T1 provider advertises. Assuming you have BGP, I would thing that policy routing and using different global addresses would get the job done. Sounds to me like the only barrier is getting BGP. Kent Hundley wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Wayne, I would suggest disabling NAT on the PIX and performing your NAT on the router. This eliminates the problem of not knowing what packets originate from the servers. Then, setup Policy-Based Routing (PBR) on the router. You didn't post your config, so I assume you have 2 legal addresses, one from each ISP and you don't have your own address space. If you want to setup inbound services you'll have to setup static NAT on the router for the services you want to allow. For outbound the PBR it's pretty simple: int s 0 interface to T1 int e 0 interface to DSL int ip policy route-map test access-list 100 any route-map test permit 10 match ip address 100 set int s 0 route-map test permit 20 For outbound traffic packets from the servers will be sent out the T1 as long as it is up, all other traffic will be forwarded normally. You'll want to set your routing so that the DSL line is the preferred path for all traffic. If the T1 goes down, the traffic from the servers will be sent out the DSL. Additional problems that I see are if your servers are to be accessible from the Internet, you will need to have static translations setup for your services on both the T1 and the DSL. You can do this, but the issue becomes name resolution and which address is returned to users on the Internet. It's probably safer to just setup the translations for the T1 and leave it at that. (you could play some games if you ran your own DNS, but things get complicated pretty quickly) You don't need the FFS on the router as long as everything is behind the PIX (although it shouldn't hurt) and you don't need the link between the router and the PIX to be have a public address space as long as you do the NAT on the router. Of course, you also will want to harden the Internet facing router if you have not already done so. One more thing, it's not really accurate to say the PIX doesn't route. People say this all the time and what they really mean is that the PIX doesn't support routing protocols and some fancy routing techniques like PBR. However, the PIX does perform layer 3 forwarding based on its routing table, this means, by definition, it is routing. It just doesn't have the same features and functions for layer 3 forwarding that cisco routers have. (this is kind of a nit, but saying the PIX doesn't route tends to confuse people) HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wayne Jang Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix don't route [7:46356] Hi, The Pix don't route, but can I do this? I have a 2 server 20 user small office. I have a Pix 506 sitting in front of a 2621 with a T1 and a DSL link to the Internet. I'm not looking to load balance or even do redundancy. I just want traffic from the servers to use the T1 and I want traffic from the users to use DSL. I could use access-lists on the 2621 to direct the traffic based on source address, but how will the 2621 know where the traffic came from? Won't all traffic have a source address of the Pix outside interface? What if I Nat the servers(on PIx) so that they will appear to have a different source IP than the users who will be behind the global outside address? I'll need more public addresses, but that would be fine.
Re: Not only is TR going... [7:46391]
I don't think Cisco is primarily concerned with the cost of outfitting their own labs with 6500s. After all, their cost is MUCH lower than the list prices. I think Cisco is being considerate of OUR wallets. This is the same reason they don't have 7200 routers and 7500 routers on the equipment list. These are used widely in the real world, but Cisco wants us to be able to learn the material without having access to a $50,000 lab (used prices). Tim O'Brien wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Theo, By no means is the 3550 replacing the 6500 in a real world scenario. The 3550 is an IDF non-chassis switch. The most density you can get is 48 10/100 ports. However, the IOS structure and layer 3 capabilities allow you to mimic a lot of the new functionality that you have in the 6500. This will allow the CCIE lab to contain new technologies such as Private VLANS, QoS, STP enhancements, Voice VLANS, etc... This also gives way to the future of the 6500 running native IOS. So, if you are an expert on the 3550, chance are that you will know your way around a 6500 pretty well. Tim CCIE 9015 p.s. Think of the cost of outfitting the 9 CCIE labs with new 6506's. With RTP having something like 14 racks, I will use 10 as an average since I have no idea what the other labs have. A simple config on a 6506 with a Sup2-MSFC2, a WS-X6348-RJ45V, the necessary software and memory comes to $71,000 list price * 90 units = $6,390,000.00! They could throw in a WS-C3550-24-EMI for a list price of $4,990.00 and come out with a total of $449,100 with a similar feature set. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company, was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the 5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a good machine and I like it. Of course I like Foundry's ServerIrons too but for a Cisco Switch, I really do like the 65xx. IDS is only part of the problem. The 65xx uses modules. I thought for sure Cisco would want engineers to know about how to configure the modules not only because it increases the value of the engineer but more importantly, it is useful in marketing and sales. Don't you want to promote the modules on the 65xxx They are really expensive and Cisco must make some good money off of them. The 3550 is what? Perhaps we can all buy one, I just saw 4 on e-bay, each for under $3000, but doesn't Cisco want to test us off of what many enterprises are using? I was at a Cisco Gold Partner company last year and they only recommended the 5xxx and then the 65xx. Of course many customers bought the 29xx but on the test there was the 5xxx-a modular switch. It just doesn't make sense. It looks too easy. But hey! It's your company! Of course it will be beneficial to me as a test-taker to have the 3550. I am just at a loss as to why Cisco is not putting the replacement switch on the test. Your commments Theo Larry Letterman 06/13/2002 02:33 PM To: , cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] and why are you so distraught about no IDS..? other than the fact we all know your big on security. Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching part of the R/S lab, not the security lab... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I don't know about this thing. What is the real throughput I wonder. It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a place where is says X Gbbs throughput Has anyone really ever tested one of these puppies? I would like to know if it can really take a beating without losing packets. And this thing can't do IDS! Why O why did they choose this thing? How about the Content Swiching Module? Does it have anything like this? I am looking at the page now and can't see anything promising. Man was someone sniffing acid when they suggested the switch and it wasn't IDS??? I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this with like 10 1-gig copper connections, all intensive traffic flows between various servers. I know the 6509 can take the pain without too much trouble. Can the 3550 really perform Theo Mark Odette II Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 12:14 PM Please respond to Mark Odette II To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
RE: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]
No, but 6.2(1) is :) PDM 2.0 is also available. Have both in my lab and they seem pretty stable so far. Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Clayton Dukes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX 6.2 [7:46454] Howdy, Dows anyone know if the PIX 6.2 software is available yet? Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46461t=46454 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Not only is TR going... [7:46391]
Besides we are being tested on technologies, not products. Thomas Larus wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I don't think Cisco is primarily concerned with the cost of outfitting their own labs with 6500s. After all, their cost is MUCH lower than the list prices. I think Cisco is being considerate of OUR wallets. This is the same reason they don't have 7200 routers and 7500 routers on the equipment list. These are used widely in the real world, but Cisco wants us to be able to learn the material without having access to a $50,000 lab (used prices). Tim O'Brien wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Theo, By no means is the 3550 replacing the 6500 in a real world scenario. The 3550 is an IDF non-chassis switch. The most density you can get is 48 10/100 ports. However, the IOS structure and layer 3 capabilities allow you to mimic a lot of the new functionality that you have in the 6500. This will allow the CCIE lab to contain new technologies such as Private VLANS, QoS, STP enhancements, Voice VLANS, etc... This also gives way to the future of the 6500 running native IOS. So, if you are an expert on the 3550, chance are that you will know your way around a 6500 pretty well. Tim CCIE 9015 p.s. Think of the cost of outfitting the 9 CCIE labs with new 6506's. With RTP having something like 14 racks, I will use 10 as an average since I have no idea what the other labs have. A simple config on a 6506 with a Sup2-MSFC2, a WS-X6348-RJ45V, the necessary software and memory comes to $71,000 list price * 90 units = $6,390,000.00! They could throw in a WS-C3550-24-EMI for a list price of $4,990.00 and come out with a total of $449,100 with a similar feature set. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company, was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the 5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a good machine and I like it. Of course I like Foundry's ServerIrons too but for a Cisco Switch, I really do like the 65xx. IDS is only part of the problem. The 65xx uses modules. I thought for sure Cisco would want engineers to know about how to configure the modules not only because it increases the value of the engineer but more importantly, it is useful in marketing and sales. Don't you want to promote the modules on the 65xxx They are really expensive and Cisco must make some good money off of them. The 3550 is what? Perhaps we can all buy one, I just saw 4 on e-bay, each for under $3000, but doesn't Cisco want to test us off of what many enterprises are using? I was at a Cisco Gold Partner company last year and they only recommended the 5xxx and then the 65xx. Of course many customers bought the 29xx but on the test there was the 5xxx-a modular switch. It just doesn't make sense. It looks too easy. But hey! It's your company! Of course it will be beneficial to me as a test-taker to have the 3550. I am just at a loss as to why Cisco is not putting the replacement switch on the test. Your commments Theo Larry Letterman 06/13/2002 02:33 PM To: , cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] and why are you so distraught about no IDS..? other than the fact we all know your big on security. Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching part of the R/S lab, not the security lab... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I don't know about this thing. What is the real throughput I wonder. It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a place where is says X Gbbs throughput Has anyone really ever tested one of these puppies? I would like to know if it can really take a beating without losing packets. And this thing can't do IDS! Why O why did they choose this thing? How about the Content Swiching Module? Does it have anything like this? I am looking at the page now and can't see anything promising. Man was someone sniffing acid when they suggested the switch and it wasn't IDS??? I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this with like 10 1-gig copper connections, all intensive traffic flows between various servers. I know the 6509 can take the pain without too much trouble. Can
Route Reflectors Peer-Group [7:46464]
Hi, I have read both BGP 4 Command Reference + CCNP Building Scable Cisco Networks, they both state that peer-group and route reflectors are not compatible to each other. Yet, when I tried to configure both together... it seems to work for me :( Am I missing something important here? RouterB#sh ip bgp ne BGP neighbor is 172.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 Route-Reflector Client group1 peer-group member BGP version 4, remote router ID 172.16.0.2 BGP state = Established, table version = 1, up for 00:28:41 Last read 00:00:40, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds Received 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 2; dropped 1 Last reset 00:28:52, due to RR client config change 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes 0 history paths consume 0 bytes Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 Local host: 172.16.0.1, Local port: 11003 Foreign host: 172.16.0.2, Foreign port: 179 Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0 mis-ordered: 0 (0 bytes) Event Timers (current time is 0x263A98): Timer StartsWakeupsNext Retrans32 0 0x0 TimeWait0 0 0x0 AckHold31 19 0x0 SendWnd 0 0 0x0 KeepAlive 0 0 0x0 GiveUp 0 0 0x0 PmtuAger0 0 0x0 DeadWait0 0 0x0 iss: 904884479 snduna: 904885079 sndnxt: 904885079 sndwnd: 15785 irs: 3309753480 rcvnxt: 3309754096 rcvwnd: 15769 delrcvwnd:615 SRTT: 310 ms, RTTO: 780 ms, RTV: 80 ms, KRTT: 0 ms minRTT: 24 ms, maxRTT: 300 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms Flags: higher precedence, nagle Datagrams (max data segment is 1460 bytes): Rcvd: 44 (out of order: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 615 Sent: 52 (retransmit: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 599 BGP neighbor is 193.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 Route-Reflector Client group1 peer-group member BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 BGP state = Active, table version = 0 Last read 00:04:24, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds Received 33 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 37 messages, 1 notifications, 0 in queue Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 2; dropped 2 Last reset 00:04:45, due to BGP Notification sent, hold time expired 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes 0 history paths consume 0 bytes No active TCP connection RouterB# Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46464t=46464 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]
Cool, thanks :-) Clayton Dukes CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Roberts, Larry To: 'Clayton Dukes' ; Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:05 AM Subject: RE: PIX 6.2 [7:46454] No, but 6.2(1) is :) PDM 2.0 is also available. Have both in my lab and they seem pretty stable so far. Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Clayton Dukes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX 6.2 [7:46454] Howdy, Dows anyone know if the PIX 6.2 software is available yet? Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46465t=46454 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
from CCO: Lab Exam Content and Equipment Changes CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical content and equipment in the lab exam. Effective October 1st, 2002, candidates will no longer be tested in the areas of IGRP, Token Ring, Token Ring Switching, or IPX. Note: DLSW+ will remain as a protocol that can be tested in the lab. The Catalyst 5500 switch will be replaced with the Catalyst 3550. From: Walker, Jim Reply-To: Walker, Jim To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:34:57 -0400 YES, please do explain what happens after October. Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, Could you explain a bit more what happen after October ? Thanks Philip - Original Message - Wrom: IYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKED To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] you apparently dont need the token or cat switch anymore if you are taking the lab after october... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Wrom: OTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJ Hunt Lee Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46463t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
...if I know vlans and switching, I can setup a 6500 as easy as a 3500... This right here is what I think one of the biggest points are with this change in the LAB. Cisco doesn't have to waste money on their own LAB by putting in the 6500, if the same objectives can be proven by the test taker on the 3550. After all, it's a Routing and SWITCHING LAB Exam, not a SECURITY LAB Exam! Like I said, it's obvious... Cisco is trying to be smarter with their dollar, just as much as all those companies they try to sell their high-end equipment to. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Larry Letterman Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] you have some good points However we have 35 + buildings in our campus and I have almost as many 3500xls as I do 6509's in my IDF/BDF/Labs. 6500 switches will only prepare you for enterprise work, and we sell alot of small systems as well to medium business's. My opinion is if I know vlans and switching, I can setup a 6500 as easy as a 3500... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company, was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the 5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a good machine and I like it. Of course I like Foundry's ServerIrons too but for a Cisco Switch, I really do like the 65xx. IDS is only part of the problem. The 65xx uses modules. I thought for sure Cisco would want engineers to know about how to configure the modules not only because it increases the value of the engineer but more importantly, it is useful in marketing and sales. Don't you want to promote the modules on the 65xxx They are really expensive and Cisco must make some good money off of them. The 3550 is what? Perhaps we can all buy one, I just saw 4 on e-bay, each for under $3000, but doesn't Cisco want to test us off of what many enterprises are using? I was at a Cisco Gold Partner company last year and they only recommended the 5xxx and then the 65xx. Of course many customers bought the 29xx but on the test there was the 5xxx-a modular switch. It just doesn't make sense. It looks too easy. But hey! It's your company! Of course it will be beneficial to me as a test-taker to have the 3550. I am just at a loss as to why Cisco is not putting the replacement switch on the test. Your commments Theo Larry Letterman 06/13/2002 02:33 PM To: , cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] and why are you so distraught about no IDS..? other than the fact we all know your big on security. Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching part of the R/S lab, not the security lab... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I don't know about this thing. What is the real throughput I wonder. It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a place where is says X Gbbs throughput Has anyone really ever tested one of these puppies? I would like to know if it can really take a beating without losing packets. And this thing can't do IDS! Why O why did they choose this thing? How about the Content Swiching Module? Does it have anything like this? I am looking at the page now and can't see anything promising. Man was someone sniffing acid when they suggested the switch and it wasn't IDS??? I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this with like 10 1-gig copper connections, all intensive traffic flows between various servers. I know the 6509 can take the pain without too much trouble. Can the 3550 really perform Theo Mark Odette II Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 12:14 PM Please respond to Mark Odette II To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] The 3550 running the Enhanced image of IOS is a layer 3 switch with 24 or 48 ports- No need for a Route Module add-on. You can put an IP on every single port too from what I understand. It more or less can do the same thing as a 6500 - minus any Tel-Co blades that might be able to be put in the 6500. Of course, I don't have any experience with the 6500 series switch, so I don't know what all you can put in it. :( Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
Because it's a low-price switch that supports: --(from cisco's website)-- Key Enterprise Features Allows you to deploy network-wide intelligent services with the simplicity of traditional LAN switching Extends a set of Layer 2-to-Layer 4 features in Cisco IOS. Software- IP routing, QoS, rate limiting, access control lists (ACLs), and multicast services- to the edge Simplifies access layer and small backbone deployment with the embedded Cisco Cluster Management Suite Software Delivers powerful Gigabit Ethernet connectivity with a full suite of Gigabit Interface Converter (GBIC) devices Key Metro Access Benefits Provides service breadth through high-performance IP routing, 802.1Q tunneling, advanced QoS, and rate limiting Delivers service availability and security through Spanning Tree Protocol enhancements and ACLs Enables service management through Cisco IE 2100 Series Intelligence Engine support and Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco home labs: www.optsys.net wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dream of many 3550s.. Question: Maybe I am an Idiot or something but why are they using the 3550? I just don't understand. I thought they shoud use the 6506 or something like that not a lower model. Can someone clarify this point for me. Theo Steven A. Ridder Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 11:00 AM Please respond to Steven A. Ridder To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I'm an idiot. I see someone else already posted it. I'm going to bed then. Steve Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Right from Cisco's mouth: NO MORE IPX, TOKEN RING, OR CatOS! CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical content and equipment in the lab exam. Effective October 1st, 2002, candidates will no longer be tested in the areas of IGRP, Token Ring, Token Ring Switching, or IPX. Note: DLSW+ will remain as a protocol that can be tested in the lab. The Catalyst 5500 switch will be replaced with the Catalyst 3550. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18 -- RFC 1149 Compliant Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46408t=46391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Training Documents? [7:46298]
Thanks for the compliment :-) Running a website is somewhat of a thankless business (ask the Groupstudy founder), especially when that website is free I've been collecting study guides for a while, the website has been running for about 4 years now :-) Clayton Dukes CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: John Stamos To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:09 AM Subject: Re: Training Documents? [7:46298] Thanks, everyone for your great responses! Dukes, how on earth did you get so much material? John... Clayton Dukes wrote: Ha! I forgot the most important thing...the url! Well, we all have our bimbo days I suppose :-) http://www.gdd.net Clayton Dukes CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Clayton Dukes To: Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:42 PM Subject: Re: Training Documents? [7:46298] Hi John, I run a website that has exactly what you are looking for. Out of the hundred plus training docs/study guides, there's only 1 that's for sale (The Ultimate CCIE Study Guide, $15.95), the rest are free and include Study guides for preparing for Cisco's CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, CCDP and CCIE RS and Security. P.S. The website does require a login, but it's free (I just like to know who's playing on my server :-)) Good luck! Clayton Dukes CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: John Stamos To: Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:48 PM Subject: Training Documents? [7:46298] Hi Everyone, I'm new to the list and was wondering if there are any good websites that offer free training material? Thank you! -John - Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46455t=46298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
I put together a free document with accumulated list wisdom on starting lab preparation on www.laganiere.net, but just off the top of my head - 1) You only need one terminal server, and the 2511's sell well on ebay, so I'd keep the better one, and sell the other to raise cash to buy some of the other things you'll need. 2) If you're planning to take the exam before October, keep the 5k, otherwise sell it and get an IOS-based switch (as of today). 3) Unless you're planning to take the exam before October, forget the TR stuff (as of today). 4) You definitly want something with more then four serial ports so you can do frame 5) It's great that you have the 2503's, but get an ISDN sim (remember that you might need NT1's) 6) Max the memory out on the routers and load up the most feature-rich current IOS you can find. Voice and ATM can be done on-line cheaply enough. At that point, you've got a great pod, and can do most anything. I'd only suppliment it as you start doing labs and see that you need specific things. I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:01 PM Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46405t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vpn pix to fw-1 (in case someone is interested) [7:46467]
Hi, in case someone else catches this gotcha. I finished testing a vpn between a pix 6.1(1) and a fw-1 (nokia ip71, 4.1). Followed the guide in the cisco site at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/cp-p.html Nothing worked initially when trying to open the vpn from the pix inside, some errors when opening from the ip71 outside. Then I noticed the ipsec and isakmp timeouts weren't aligned, fixed that. Still nothing if trying to open the vpn from the pix side, but correct initialization of the vpn if started from the ip71 side, encryption happening in fw-1, pix complaing for tcp address spoof for return packets. Appareantly the pix needed a explicit route to the next hop for the (private, 192.168) network sitting behind the fw-1, even if that next hop was the default router anyway. Without that he did not route correctly the packet to the outside address, did not use the crypto map applied on the outside interface, no 200$, packet went directly to jail. With the route for that 192.168 network to its default router everything worked, even if that network was correctly referenced in the acl used as crypto map mapname 10 match address acl. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46467t=46467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
difference between a Catalyst 2950 and a 3550? [7:46468]
Does anybody know what the difference is between a Catalyst 2950 and a Catalyst 3550? I read the product literature but couldn't really pinpoint what the differences are. Cisco wouldn't sell them as two different products if they do the same thing, right??? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46468t=46468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route Reflectors Peer-Group [7:46464]
Route Reflection within peer groups is a common practise. At 11:26 AM 6/13/2002 -0400, Hunt Lee wrote: Hi, I have read both BGP 4 Command Reference + CCNP Building Scable Cisco Networks, they both state that peer-group and route reflectors are not compatible to each other. Yet, when I tried to configure both together... it seems to work for me :( Am I missing something important here? RouterB#sh ip bgp ne BGP neighbor is 172.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 Route-Reflector Client group1 peer-group member BGP version 4, remote router ID 172.16.0.2 BGP state = Established, table version = 1, up for 00:28:41 Last read 00:00:40, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds Received 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 2; dropped 1 Last reset 00:28:52, due to RR client config change 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes 0 history paths consume 0 bytes Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 Local host: 172.16.0.1, Local port: 11003 Foreign host: 172.16.0.2, Foreign port: 179 Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0 mis-ordered: 0 (0 bytes) Event Timers (current time is 0x263A98): Timer StartsWakeupsNext Retrans32 0 0x0 TimeWait0 0 0x0 AckHold31 19 0x0 SendWnd 0 0 0x0 KeepAlive 0 0 0x0 GiveUp 0 0 0x0 PmtuAger0 0 0x0 DeadWait0 0 0x0 iss: 904884479 snduna: 904885079 sndnxt: 904885079 sndwnd: 15785 irs: 3309753480 rcvnxt: 3309754096 rcvwnd: 15769 delrcvwnd:615 SRTT: 310 ms, RTTO: 780 ms, RTV: 80 ms, KRTT: 0 ms minRTT: 24 ms, maxRTT: 300 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms Flags: higher precedence, nagle Datagrams (max data segment is 1460 bytes): Rcvd: 44 (out of order: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 615 Sent: 52 (retransmit: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 599 BGP neighbor is 193.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 Route-Reflector Client group1 peer-group member BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 BGP state = Active, table version = 0 Last read 00:04:24, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds Received 33 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 37 messages, 1 notifications, 0 in queue Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 2; dropped 2 Last reset 00:04:45, due to BGP Notification sent, hold time expired 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes 0 history paths consume 0 bytes No active TCP connection RouterB# Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46469t=46464 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]
it is Clayton Dukes wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Howdy, Dows anyone know if the PIX 6.2 software is available yet? Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46470t=46454 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: difference between a Catalyst 2950 and a 3550? [7:46468]
I think the 3550 has faster backplane, more Routing protocols, gig ports for access devices, HSRP, ACL's, multicast routing. Sandra Carr wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anybody know what the difference is between a Catalyst 2950 and a Catalyst 3550? I read the product literature but couldn't really pinpoint what the differences are. Cisco wouldn't sell them as two different products if they do the same thing, right??? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46471t=46468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Works 2000 [7:46446]
IE 6.0 Patrick Donlon wrote: I've just started to use CW2000 after it had been installed by a colleague. I have a Sun workstation and Netscape 4.78, the problem I have is that Netscape doesn't display all the frames sometimes or the data in a page. I do have a Windows machine and it does display the pages but very slowly. What do other people use with CW2000?? Cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46472t=46446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serial no MAC [7:46429]
yeah, there's no need for MAC address as such for PPP interfaces. but what about PPP over ethernet. - Original Message - From: timothy thielen To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:20 AM Subject: Re: Serial no MAC [7:46429] I would like to revise and extend your answer. :-) A serial interface is not *always* point-to-point. The answer actually depends on the Layer 2 protocol you are using. If you are using Frame-relay, you have a DLCI mapped to the IP address. On ATM you have a VPI/VCI combo. On point-to-point (PPP, etc...) the router, as Steven said, doesn't need a hardware address, since it is just sending and recieving on the interface where there is only one possible recipient, so the router only needs to know that the destination is out a specific p-t-p serial interface. -Tim Steven A. Ridder wrote: point-to-point, so no mac is needed. There is only one recepient. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Stanzin Takpa wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... When there is no MAC address on serial interface, how the packets are routing ? Stanzin [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46473t=46429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route Reflectors Peer-Group [7:46464]
I'm using peer-groups with route-reflectors on different Cisco platforms (2500, 7500, 12000) and it works fine !! -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom Network specialization CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hunt Lee a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I have read both BGP 4 Command Reference + CCNP Building Scable Cisco Networks, they both state that peer-group and route reflectors are not compatible to each other. Yet, when I tried to configure both together... it seems to work for me :( Am I missing something important here? RouterB#sh ip bgp ne BGP neighbor is 172.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 Route-Reflector Client group1 peer-group member BGP version 4, remote router ID 172.16.0.2 BGP state = Established, table version = 1, up for 00:28:41 Last read 00:00:40, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds Received 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 2; dropped 1 Last reset 00:28:52, due to RR client config change 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes 0 history paths consume 0 bytes Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 Local host: 172.16.0.1, Local port: 11003 Foreign host: 172.16.0.2, Foreign port: 179 Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0 mis-ordered: 0 (0 bytes) Event Timers (current time is 0x263A98): Timer StartsWakeupsNext Retrans32 0 0x0 TimeWait0 0 0x0 AckHold31 19 0x0 SendWnd 0 0 0x0 KeepAlive 0 0 0x0 GiveUp 0 0 0x0 PmtuAger0 0 0x0 DeadWait0 0 0x0 iss: 904884479 snduna: 904885079 sndnxt: 904885079 sndwnd: 15785 irs: 3309753480 rcvnxt: 3309754096 rcvwnd: 15769 delrcvwnd:615 SRTT: 310 ms, RTTO: 780 ms, RTV: 80 ms, KRTT: 0 ms minRTT: 24 ms, maxRTT: 300 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms Flags: higher precedence, nagle Datagrams (max data segment is 1460 bytes): Rcvd: 44 (out of order: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 615 Sent: 52 (retransmit: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 599 BGP neighbor is 193.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 Route-Reflector Client group1 peer-group member BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 BGP state = Active, table version = 0 Last read 00:04:24, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds Received 33 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 37 messages, 1 notifications, 0 in queue Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 2; dropped 2 Last reset 00:04:45, due to BGP Notification sent, hold time expired 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes 0 history paths consume 0 bytes No active TCP connection RouterB# Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46474t=46464 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: redundant pri's ?? [7:46203]
Thanks!! This is exactly what I was looking for. I have heard of this, but I can't always remember the acronyms!! Thanks again! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46475t=46203 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#018c2a36a8345f38048e8812191bc86b) [7:46476]
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 13 05:54:11 2002 Received: from web12708.mail.yahoo.com (web12708.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.245]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA14536 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:54:10 -0400 Message-ID: Received: from [195.39.134.85] by web12708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 02:54:48 PDT Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 02:54:48 -0700 (PDT) From: cajetan fernandes Subject: Cisco Certification Digest To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sir, I use to receive cisco certification digest but now from last week i do not receive them I would be greatful if you could activate it again. Thank you cajii __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46476t=46476 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route Reflectors Peer-Group [7:46464]
Can you point to the pages where you saw this on BGP 4 command reference. I couldn't find any thing to that effect. I took the CBCR class and we used peer groups with Reflectors, it seemed to work fine. Hunt Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I have read both BGP 4 Command Reference + CCNP Building Scable Cisco Networks, they both state that peer-group and route reflectors are not compatible to each other. Yet, when I tried to configure both together... it seems to work for me :( Am I missing something important here? RouterB#sh ip bgp ne BGP neighbor is 172.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 Route-Reflector Client group1 peer-group member BGP version 4, remote router ID 172.16.0.2 BGP state = Established, table version = 1, up for 00:28:41 Last read 00:00:40, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds Received 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 2; dropped 1 Last reset 00:28:52, due to RR client config change 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes 0 history paths consume 0 bytes Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 Local host: 172.16.0.1, Local port: 11003 Foreign host: 172.16.0.2, Foreign port: 179 Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0 mis-ordered: 0 (0 bytes) Event Timers (current time is 0x263A98): Timer StartsWakeupsNext Retrans32 0 0x0 TimeWait0 0 0x0 AckHold31 19 0x0 SendWnd 0 0 0x0 KeepAlive 0 0 0x0 GiveUp 0 0 0x0 PmtuAger0 0 0x0 DeadWait0 0 0x0 iss: 904884479 snduna: 904885079 sndnxt: 904885079 sndwnd: 15785 irs: 3309753480 rcvnxt: 3309754096 rcvwnd: 15769 delrcvwnd:615 SRTT: 310 ms, RTTO: 780 ms, RTV: 80 ms, KRTT: 0 ms minRTT: 24 ms, maxRTT: 300 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms Flags: higher precedence, nagle Datagrams (max data segment is 1460 bytes): Rcvd: 44 (out of order: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 615 Sent: 52 (retransmit: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 599 BGP neighbor is 193.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 Route-Reflector Client group1 peer-group member BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 BGP state = Active, table version = 0 Last read 00:04:24, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds Received 33 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 37 messages, 1 notifications, 0 in queue Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 2; dropped 2 Last reset 00:04:45, due to BGP Notification sent, hold time expired 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes 0 history paths consume 0 bytes No active TCP connection RouterB# Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46477t=46464 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Difference between cat 6000 6500 and 3550 [7:46478]
I have a cat 6000 at work available for testing. Is there any major difference (other then backplane capacity) as compared to 3550 or 6500. I guess I just wanted to know that performance aside, are rest of the IOS features supported same accross all three platforms. I plan to use it for CCIE studies. Thx, JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46478t=46478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1720 with Wic-1enet problems. [7:46479]
Is Wic-1enet only supported in the 122-2.XJ releases. I tried using later releases like 122-6f and 122-10a but none of them recognize this WIC. I am worried if it will be supported in any future releases. Does any one else have the same experience. Thanks, JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46479t=46479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Works 2000 [7:46446]
I've noticed that Netscape 4.78 is slow on our very fast Unix server, as well. I believe that Netscape 6.0 is available from Sun. Perhaps you should try that one to see if they've improved the speed. Jason Owens 6/13/02 11:15:13 AM IE 6.0 Patrick Donlon wrote: I've just started to use CW2000 after it had been installed by a colleague. I have a Sun workstation and Netscape 4.78, the problem I have is that Netscape doesn't display all the frames sometimes or the data in a page. I do have a Windows machine and it does display the pages but very slowly. What do other people use with CW2000?? Cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46480t=46446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Difference between cat 6000 6500 and 3550 [7:46478]
Are they using 6x00 switches in the lab? I thought they were still using Cat5000s and therefore the CatOS and Set/Show/Clear commands. If that is still the case, you wouldn't want to use a 3550 as it uses IOS (config t, etc). I know the 6000s and 6500s you can use in Hybrid (CatOS) or Native (IOS) mode... I believe if you don't specify when you order, you'll get Hybrid by default.. Just be sure that you're in hybrid and it should be very much like being on a Cat5000. If the 6000 happens to be in Native, you can convert to Hybrid by following these instructions: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/80.shtml HTH, Mike W. JohnZ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have a cat 6000 at work available for testing. Is there any major difference (other then backplane capacity) as compared to 3550 or 6500. I guess I just wanted to know that performance aside, are rest of the IOS features supported same accross all three platforms. I plan to use it for CCIE studies. Thx, JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46482t=46478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46481t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
I bet you that the new lab's format/blueprint will resemble the new CCIE beta's blueprint. I'm pretty sure the announcement will be made at the Networkers CCIE power-session in San Diego in 2 weeks. So, it doesn't sound easier, but at least the topics are up-to-date. The only thing I don't like is that MPLS may be in the new lab, and that's not a technology that's really taken off yet. I think Cisco should wait until more of their Cisco Powered Networks get built. But it seems that from all the marketing announcements I have read, interviews with John Chambers, studies and reports that have come out, that Cisco is really going to focus on getting the service provider market in the next rebound. Plus I see all sorts of positioning with the Hotel/Hospitality arena. I wonder how Nortel and Avaya will take it. nrf wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Whether this is good or bad news for candidates is difficult to say. The real question is what they are going to replace it with. I always saw those removed topics as gimme points. For example now they could start asking super-funky voice or ATM questions. Or they could accelerate the move to 12.2, which has a host of new complex features. Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm an idiot. I see someone else already posted it. I'm going to bed then. Steve Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Right from Cisco's mouth: NO MORE IPX, TOKEN RING, OR CatOS! CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical content and equipment in the lab exam. Effective October 1st, 2002, candidates will no longer be tested in the areas of IGRP, Token Ring, Token Ring Switching, or IPX. Note: DLSW+ will remain as a protocol that can be tested in the lab. The Catalyst 5500 switch will be replaced with the Catalyst 3550. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18 -- RFC 1149 Compliant Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46484t=46391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Route Reflectors Peer-Group [7:46464]
Hunt is right, on the web they do say that peer groups are not compatible with route reflectors due to route withdrawal problems, I don't know about the book. Here is a link to the website that states it about 3/4 of the way down the page, I also have no problem running redundant reflectors using peer groups, and the client routers are not running IBGP with each other, according to this link that is a requirement. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/16.html#A24.0 *-Original Message- *From: JohnZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:47 PM *To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject: Re: Route Reflectors Peer-Group [7:46464] * * *Can you point to the pages where you saw this on BGP 4 command *reference. I *couldn't find any thing to that effect. I took the CBCR class *and we used *peer groups with Reflectors, it seemed to work fine. *Hunt Lee wrote in message *[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... * Hi, * * I have read both BGP 4 Command Reference + CCNP Building *Scable Cisco * Networks, they both state that peer-group and route *reflectors are not * compatible to each other. Yet, when I tried to configure *both together... * it seems to work for me :( Am I missing something important here? * * RouterB#sh ip bgp ne * BGP neighbor is 172.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link * Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 * Route-Reflector Client * group1 peer-group member * BGP version 4, remote router ID 172.16.0.2 * BGP state = Established, table version = 1, up for 00:28:41 * Last read 00:00:40, hold time is 180, keepalive interval *is 60 seconds * Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds * Received 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue * Sent 36 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue * Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 * Connections established 2; dropped 1 * Last reset 00:28:52, due to RR client config change * 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes * 0 history paths consume 0 bytes * Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 * Local host: 172.16.0.1, Local port: 11003 * Foreign host: 172.16.0.2, Foreign port: 179 * * Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0 mis-ordered: 0 *(0 bytes) * * Event Timers (current time is 0x263A98): * Timer StartsWakeupsNext * Retrans32 0 0x0 * TimeWait0 0 0x0 * AckHold31 19 0x0 * SendWnd 0 0 0x0 * KeepAlive 0 0 0x0 * GiveUp 0 0 0x0 * PmtuAger0 0 0x0 * DeadWait0 0 0x0 * * iss: 904884479 snduna: 904885079 sndnxt: 904885079 *sndwnd: 15785 * irs: 3309753480 rcvnxt: 3309754096 rcvwnd: 15769 *delrcvwnd:615 * * SRTT: 310 ms, RTTO: 780 ms, RTV: 80 ms, KRTT: 0 ms * minRTT: 24 ms, maxRTT: 300 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms * Flags: higher precedence, nagle * * Datagrams (max data segment is 1460 bytes): * Rcvd: 44 (out of order: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 615 * Sent: 52 (retransmit: 0), with data: 31, total data bytes: 599 * * * BGP neighbor is 193.16.0.2, remote AS 1, internal link * Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 * Route-Reflector Client * group1 peer-group member * BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 * BGP state = Active, table version = 0 * Last read 00:04:24, hold time is 180, keepalive interval *is 60 seconds * Minimum time between advertisement runs is 5 seconds * Received 33 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue * Sent 37 messages, 1 notifications, 0 in queue * Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 * Connections established 2; dropped 2 * Last reset 00:04:45, due to BGP Notification sent, hold *time expired * 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes * 0 history paths consume 0 bytes * No active TCP connection * RouterB# * * * Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. * * Thanks * * -- * * Hunt Lee * * WebCentral * * * * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46485t=46464 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
yes. Khalsa Singh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46486t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help with vpn and pix [7:46487]
Hi you all , imp trying to use this config from Cisco web site http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pix3000.htmland I has some questions. Suppose if my network has for inside address 10.254.2.1 255.255.255.248 Those the vpn ip pool have to be in the same network as the inside address, because I only have one ip address left to use and would like tohave other users use the vpn tunnel Can I use another network like? 10.0.1.0 Which not use internally? This is a diagram of my network (10.254.2.2) (10.254.2.1)/27 7513pix--outside | LAN | Network 10.200.0.0 Now be looking at Cisco example they have a permit access-list which includes the inside network and they specify another network with a /24 mine is /27 do I have to re subnet? Imp kind of confused. Help.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46487t=46487 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
DLSW can still be configured and tested without Token Ring. -Original Message- From: Khalsa Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481] I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46488t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
How is that possible, do you have a link to a url that explains how to do it, if that's possible then I can exclude all the routers that have token ring interface, I really wanted to know, since I have made a commitment to somebody to buy the whole CCIE Lab this saturday thanks in advance Khalsa Singh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46489t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
How is that possible, do you have a link to a url that explains how to do it, if that's possible then I can exclude all the routers that have token ring interface, I really wanted to know, since I have made a commitment to somebody to buy the whole CCIE Lab this saturday thanks in advance Moffett, Ryan wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... DLSW can still be configured and tested without Token Ring. -Original Message- From: Khalsa Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481] I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46490t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Difference between cat 6000 6500 and 3550 [7:46478]
As has been mentioned here else where in this group that Cat6000s are in place in some labsites but also that the new CCIE lab format in October replaces cat5000s with Cat3550s. Michael L. Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Are they using 6x00 switches in the lab? I thought they were still using Cat5000s and therefore the CatOS and Set/Show/Clear commands. If that is still the case, you wouldn't want to use a 3550 as it uses IOS (config t, etc). I know the 6000s and 6500s you can use in Hybrid (CatOS) or Native (IOS) mode... I believe if you don't specify when you order, you'll get Hybrid by default.. Just be sure that you're in hybrid and it should be very much like being on a Cat5000. If the 6000 happens to be in Native, you can convert to Hybrid by following these instructions: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/80.shtml HTH, Mike W. JohnZ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have a cat 6000 at work available for testing. Is there any major difference (other then backplane capacity) as compared to 3550 or 6500. I guess I just wanted to know that performance aside, are rest of the IOS features supported same accross all three platforms. I plan to use it for CCIE studies. Thx, JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46491t=46478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QA Cisco 3550 Series [7:46492]
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46492t=46492 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QA Cisco 3550 Series [7:46493]
Here is the url, i don't why the url didn't show in my previous post I'm going to try again http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3550/prodlit/c3550_qp.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46493t=46493 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not a Tech question (Looking for Charles Riley) [7:46494]
Looking for a guy by the name of CHarles Riley, sometime on this group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46494t=46494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE BETA results???? ANYONE? [7:46495]
All, Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took the exam months ago.no results yetjust wondering if anyone had gotten anything back from cisco yet Curious, Jason Clark, CCNP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46495t=46495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fw: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
One important question though: Will Cisco continue to focus on the Cat 5 for the CCNP switching or will they do away with it and focus on the CAT3550? If so, then keeping my CAT5 does not make sense. But then who would buy itpaid millions for it :-( Regards. From: Dennis Laganiere Reply-To: Dennis Laganiere To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fw: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:40:44 -0400 I put together a free document with accumulated list wisdom on starting lab preparation on www.laganiere.net, but just off the top of my head - 1) You only need one terminal server, and the 2511's sell well on ebay, so I'd keep the better one, and sell the other to raise cash to buy some of the other things you'll need. 2) If you're planning to take the exam before October, keep the 5k, otherwise sell it and get an IOS-based switch (as of today). 3) Unless you're planning to take the exam before October, forget the TR stuff (as of today). 4) You definitly want something with more then four serial ports so you can do frame 5) It's great that you have the 2503's, but get an ISDN sim (remember that you might need NT1's) 6) Max the memory out on the routers and load up the most feature-rich current IOS you can find. Voice and ATM can be done on-line cheaply enough. At that point, you've got a great pod, and can do most anything. I'd only suppliment it as you start doing labs and see that you need specific things. I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:01 PM Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46483t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
The following links deal with DLSw and Ethernet, and DLSw topics in general http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/697/3.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/3.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/697/index.shtml http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/index.shtml -Original Message- From: Khalsa Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481] How is that possible, do you have a link to a url that explains how to do it, if that's possible then I can exclude all the routers that have token ring interface, I really wanted to know, since I have made a commitment to somebody to buy the whole CCIE Lab this saturday thanks in advance Khalsa Singh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46498t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: difference between a Catalyst 2950 and a 3550? [7:46468]
The 3550 support layer 3 with EMI software and the 3550's are more powerful higher end switches just beneath the chassis systems. Dave Sandra Carr wrote: Does anybody know what the difference is between a Catalyst 2950 and a Catalyst 3550? I read the product literature but couldn't really pinpoint what the differences are. Cisco wouldn't sell them as two different products if they do the same thing, right??? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46499t=46468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: End of CCIE Written [7:46445]
Hi, Does you guys have a copy of that official announcement from Cisco? I'd like to see that. I'm in preparation to take the current one..guess I wanna know if that is indeed the official word so I can cough up that $300 bux. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46501t=46445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
Thanks Ryan, I'm confused, so when cisco says, no token ring in the CCIE lab from oct 2002 but DLSW will be there, what does that mean. Should we expect to configure DLSW on TR-to-TR network or Eth-to-Eth network or WAN or both in the Lab Khalsa Singh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46502t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIF? [7:46503]
I am currently studying how to determine how many switches are in the path by looking at the RIF field. I know that RCF stand for Route Control Field and RDF is Route Descriptor Field but what is RIF? Route Information Field? Sorry for the lame question it's just bugging me. :-0 MG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46503t=46503 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
My take is that while Token Ring will not be there, Ethernet will. And as such, DLSw is still a subject that can be tested. If they are removing Token Ring, then the SRB facets of DLSw are going to be dropped. -Original Message- From: Khalsa Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481] Thanks Ryan, I'm confused, so when cisco says, no token ring in the CCIE lab from oct 2002 but DLSW will be there, what does that mean. Should we expect to configure DLSW on TR-to-TR network or Eth-to-Eth network or WAN or both in the Lab Khalsa Singh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46505t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
How about over a WAN link?!?! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Khalsa Singh Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481] Thanks Ryan, I'm confused, so when cisco says, no token ring in the CCIE lab from oct 2002 but DLSW will be there, what does that mean. Should we expect to configure DLSW on TR-to-TR network or Eth-to-Eth network or WAN or both in the Lab Khalsa Singh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46506t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
I recall reading somewhere, maybe this board, that you can create virtual Token-Ring interfaces. On my 2500/2600 and 4500 series routers I can do the following: ROUTER1(config)#int virtual-TokenRing ? Virtual-TokenRing interface number Here is an example: ROUTER4(config)#int virtual-To ROUTER4(config)#int virtual-TokenRing 1 ROUTER4(config-if)#end ROUTER4#sh int v 00:10:16: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoleir ROUTER4#sh int virtual-TokenRing 1 Virtual-TokenRing1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Virtual-TokenRing, address is 4000..0008 (bia 4000..0008) MTU 8136 bytes, BW 16000 Kbit, DLY 5000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation SNAP, loopback not set ARP type: SNAP, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input never, output never, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue :0/0 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 transitions ROUTER4# I forgot which IOS version this featured first appeared in. But it works in 12.1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46507t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fw: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
... Because of the fact that the 600 series exam just came out, and the 3550 has only been out roughly since March of this year (don't quote me on this), I doubt you will see the 3550 even mentioned on the new switching exam. Just my .0010 cents Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fw: CCIE home lab [7:46395] One important question though: Will Cisco continue to focus on the Cat 5 for the CCNP switching or will they do away with it and focus on the CAT3550? If so, then keeping my CAT5 does not make sense. But then who would buy itpaid millions for it :-( Regards. From: Dennis Laganiere Reply-To: Dennis Laganiere To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fw: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:40:44 -0400 I put together a free document with accumulated list wisdom on starting lab preparation on www.laganiere.net, but just off the top of my head - 1) You only need one terminal server, and the 2511's sell well on ebay, so I'd keep the better one, and sell the other to raise cash to buy some of the other things you'll need. 2) If you're planning to take the exam before October, keep the 5k, otherwise sell it and get an IOS-based switch (as of today). 3) Unless you're planning to take the exam before October, forget the TR stuff (as of today). 4) You definitly want something with more then four serial ports so you can do frame 5) It's great that you have the 2503's, but get an ISDN sim (remember that you might need NT1's) 6) Max the memory out on the routers and load up the most feature-rich current IOS you can find. Voice and ATM can be done on-line cheaply enough. At that point, you've got a great pod, and can do most anything. I'd only suppliment it as you start doing labs and see that you need specific things. I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:01 PM Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46504t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: The end of Token Ring etc [7:46497]
It's just occured to me that with that one announcement Cisco has made all the Token Ring stuff sold on Ebay, for various home labs, worthless.and saved me a pretty penny. Mike Graham CCNP, CCDP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46497t=46497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]
Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link goes up, but then (surprisingly), Router A attempts to initiate a connection to Router B . This connection fails because I only configured the phone number for one channel (Isdn error 17: User is busy). Is this calling of Router A a normal behavior? (I don't think so!) I fixed the problem by simpling removing the phone number from the map statement of Router A. I am posting here the debug before and after I removed the phone number on A. The debug where captured on Router A. I have spent the day on the apparently trivial question: why is Router A calling Router B when I have no call back of any sort. Still no light ... Want to step up to the challenge? :) Before: 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/s 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0xD 00:32:193273528320: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 01:51:113824615516: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x84 00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x84 00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x09 00:32:47: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:47: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:47: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x09 00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0A 00:32:49: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:49: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:49: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0A 00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0B 00:32:51: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:51: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:51: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:51: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to isdn3 00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0B 00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0C 00:32:53: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:53: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:53: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0C 00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/s 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0x10 00:41:227633266688: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 02:00:14602128: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 5551234 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x85 00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x85 00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x05.. 02:00:37: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up 00:41:56: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up. 02:00:40: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 5551234 isdn1 00:41:59: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to isdn3.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46496t=46496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN ....Challenging Problem! [7:46500]
Posted to Cisco Newsgroup at 3:30 on June 13, 2002 Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link goes up, but then (surprisingly), Router A attempts to initiate a connection to Router B . This connection fails because I only configured the phone number for one channel (Isdn error 17: User is busy). Is this calling of Router A a normal behavior? (I don't think so!) I fixed the problem by simpling removing the phone number from the map statement of Router A. I am posting here the debug before and after I removed the phone number on A. The debug where captured on Router A. I have spent the day on the apparently trivial question: why is Router A calling Router B when I have no call back of any sort. Still no light ... Want to step up to the challenge? :) Before: 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/s 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0xD 00:32:193273528320: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 01:51:113824615516: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x84 00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x84 00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x09 00:32:47: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:47: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:47: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x09 00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0A 00:32:49: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:49: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:49: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0A 00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0B 00:32:51: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:51: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:51: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:51: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to isdn3 00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0B 00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0C 00:32:53: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:53: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:53: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0C 00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/s 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0x10 00:41:227633266688: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 02:00:14602128: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 5551234 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x85 00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x85 00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x05.. 02:00:37: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up 00:41:56: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up. 02:00:40: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 5551234 isdn1 00:41:59: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to isdn3.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46500t=46500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
It will be Ethernet only. No TR interfaces at al will be in the lab. Khalsa Singh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks Ryan, I'm confused, so when cisco says, no token ring in the CCIE lab from oct 2002 but DLSW will be there, what does that mean. Should we expect to configure DLSW on TR-to-TR network or Eth-to-Eth network or WAN or both in the Lab Khalsa Singh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is completely out thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46508t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3550 alternatives? [7:46510]
Ok with the new news, are there any alternatives to the 3550 switch that have the same functionality ie. layer 3, etc. just at a cheaper price? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46510t=46510 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Not only is TR going... [7:46391]
Thomas Larus wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I don't think Cisco is primarily concerned with the cost of outfitting their own labs with 6500s. After all, their cost is MUCH lower than the list prices. I think Cisco is being considerate of OUR wallets. This is the same reason they don't have 7200 routers and 7500 routers on the equipment list. These are used widely in the real world, but Cisco wants us to be able to learn the material without having access to a $50,000 lab (used prices). Well, I don't know if the concept of real-world should really be invoked when you're talking about the CCIE. Even the biggest fans of the program have to concede that some of the lab-questions are just weird and obscure - nothing you would ever want to do in the 'real-world'. . When you're talking about throwing 3-4 routing protocols all redistributing amongst each other, and multiple layer-2 networks, all within only a 6-router setup, to use the phrase real-world seems a bit inappropriate. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46511t=46391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3550 alternatives? [7:46510]
2950 is close. You can get a 3550 EMI on e-bay for $2750.00, but it's probably hot, as that's lower than what a gold partner can get one for. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Jeff Barr wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok with the new news, are there any alternatives to the 3550 switch that have the same functionality ie. layer 3, etc. just at a cheaper price? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46513t=46510 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: So not one person here knows how to post... [7:46381]
You're just messin' with our minds Kris. You posted your 4 Cisco items to it yesterday. How did you do it anyway? I couldn't see how to do it either. In fact I didn't know it existed until you brought it to light. Was it just a clever publicity stunt? :-) Gaz Kris Keen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On For Sale? intresting. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46512t=46381 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]
We put it straight on our production Pix's along with the new PDM (VIPs, groups etc). We decided that if we didn't have any faith why should any of our customers, and we really wanted to play with the Groups anyway. No problems so far. Must be a month or so now. Gaz Clayton Dukes wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Howdy, Dows anyone know if the PIX 6.2 software is available yet? Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46514t=46454 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3550 alternatives? [7:46510]
I dont think so. this can do anything the 2948G_L3 (wire speed layer 3, etc) and it has the killer layer 2 stuff we all love ! For the price, this thing rocks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46515t=46510 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIF? [7:46503]
Routing information field... Clayton Dukes CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Mark Godfrey To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:41 PM Subject: RIF? [7:46503] I am currently studying how to determine how many switches are in the path by looking at the RIF field. I know that RCF stand for Route Control Field and RDF is Route Descriptor Field but what is RIF? Route Information Field? Sorry for the lame question it's just bugging me. :-0 MG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46516t=46503 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE BETA results???? ANYONE? [7:46495]
I haven't heard anything yet either Mike W. Clark Jason wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took the exam months ago.no results yetjust wondering if anyone had gotten anything back from cisco yet Curious, Jason Clark, CCNP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46517t=46495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The end of Token Ring etc [7:46497]
Michael Graham wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... It's just occured to me that with that one announcement Cisco has made all the Token Ring stuff sold on Ebay, for various home labs, worthless.and saved me a pretty penny. Well, as far as it saving you money, the answer is (as always in the Cisco world)...it depends. In particular, it depends on what exactly they are going to replace all those TR questions with, and we won't know until the first guinea-pigs try the new lab out in October. For example, what if the new lab is really really heavy into voice? Then everybody with a home-lab would have to buy voice stuff, which is a hell of a lot more expensive than TR gear. Mike Graham CCNP, CCDP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46509t=46497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX 501 Upgrade [7:46519]
Has anyone upgraded a PIX 501. All of the current 6.x files all say they require 32meg DRAM and this 501 only has 16meg. The problem I have is I need to upgrade to a 3DES license and it requires that I load a new image and I don't want to take a chance with not being able to get the current releases to work. The funny thing is this came with 6.12 on it. Rick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46519t=46519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE BETA results???? ANYONE? [7:46495]
Clark Jason wrote: All, Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took the exam months ago.no results yetjust wondering if anyone had gotten anything back from cisco yet Well... as it only ran for three weeks total between April 15 and May 6 it's just barely two months right now since the start of the Beta. I got an email from the CCIE program today letting me know that the information that Pormetric is giving out concerning Pass/Fail is not accurate as the results have not been analyzed yet, and the 'cut' has not yet been determined. It is also stated that the results should be mailed around the end of this month. Good Luck! Curious, Jason Clark, CCNP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46521t=46495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not only is TR going... [7:46391]
Okay, like I said, it is good for the test taker.Your point is accepted. Theo Tim O'Brien Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 07:59 PM Please respond to Tim O'Brien To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Not only is TR going... [7:46391] Theo, By no means is the 3550 replacing the 6500 in a real world scenario. The 3550 is an IDF non-chassis switch. The most density you can get is 48 10/100 ports. However, the IOS structure and layer 3 capabilities allow you to mimic a lot of the new functionality that you have in the 6500. This will allow the CCIE lab to contain new technologies such as Private VLANS, QoS, STP enhancements, Voice VLANS, etc... This also gives way to the future of the 6500 running native IOS. So, if you are an expert on the 3550, chance are that you will know your way around a 6500 pretty well. Tim CCIE 9015 p.s. Think of the cost of outfitting the 9 CCIE labs with new 6506's. With RTP having something like 14 racks, I will use 10 as an average since I have no idea what the other labs have. A simple config on a 6506 with a Sup2-MSFC2, a WS-X6348-RJ45V, the necessary software and memory comes to $71,000 list price * 90 units = $6,390,000.00! They could throw in a WS-C3550-24-EMI for a list price of $4,990.00 and come out with a total of $449,100 with a similar feature set. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company, was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the 5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a good machine and I like it. Of course I like Foundry's ServerIrons too but for a Cisco Switch, I really do like the 65xx. IDS is only part of the problem. The 65xx uses modules. I thought for sure Cisco would want engineers to know about how to configure the modules not only because it increases the value of the engineer but more importantly, it is useful in marketing and sales. Don't you want to promote the modules on the 65xxx They are really expensive and Cisco must make some good money off of them. The 3550 is what? Perhaps we can all buy one, I just saw 4 on e-bay, each for under $3000, but doesn't Cisco want to test us off of what many enterprises are using? I was at a Cisco Gold Partner company last year and they only recommended the 5xxx and then the 65xx. Of course many customers bought the 29xx but on the test there was the 5xxx-a modular switch. It just doesn't make sense. It looks too easy. But hey! It's your company! Of course it will be beneficial to me as a test-taker to have the 3550. I am just at a loss as to why Cisco is not putting the replacement switch on the test. Your commments Theo Larry Letterman 06/13/2002 02:33 PM To: , cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] and why are you so distraught about no IDS..? other than the fact we all know your big on security. Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching part of the R/S lab, not the security lab... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I don't know about this thing. What is the real throughput I wonder. It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a place where is says X Gbbs throughput Has anyone really ever tested one of these puppies? I would like to know if it can really take a beating without losing packets. And this thing can't do IDS! Why O why did they choose this thing? How about the Content Swiching Module? Does it have anything like this? I am looking at the page now and can't see anything promising. Man was someone sniffing acid when they suggested the switch and it wasn't IDS??? I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this with like 10 1-gig copper connections, all intensive traffic flows between various servers. I know the 6509 can take the pain without too much trouble. Can the 3550 really perform Theo Mark Odette II Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 12:14 PM Please respond to Mark Odette II To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] The 3550 running the Enhanced image of IOS is a layer 3 switch with 24 or 48 ports- No need for a Route Module add-on. You can put an IP on every single port too from what I understand. It more or less can do the same thing as a 6500 - minus any Tel-Co blades that might be able to be put in the 6500. Of
RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391]
Yo Mark! Look at my retort to Larry. I was talking not only about the IDS module but the Content Switching Module as well! It wasn't as if I was talking about the PIX and VPNs dude. I was talking about modules and the replacement to the 5xxx switch. Got the point? I wasn't worried about PIX 506 commands vs PIX 535s but rather 65xx commands vs the 3550. Theo Mark Odette II Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/14/2002 12:36 AM Please respond to Mark Odette II To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] ...if I know vlans and switching, I can setup a 6500 as easy as a 3500... This right here is what I think one of the biggest points are with this change in the LAB. Cisco doesn't have to waste money on their own LAB by putting in the 6500, if the same objectives can be proven by the test taker on the 3550. After all, it's a Routing and SWITCHING LAB Exam, not a SECURITY LAB Exam! Like I said, it's obvious... Cisco is trying to be smarter with their dollar, just as much as all those companies they try to sell their high-end equipment to. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Larry Letterman Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] you have some good points However we have 35 + buildings in our campus and I have almost as many 3500xls as I do 6509's in my IDF/BDF/Labs. 6500 switches will only prepare you for enterprise work, and we sell alot of small systems as well to medium business's. My opinion is if I know vlans and switching, I can setup a 6500 as easy as a 3500... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company, was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the 5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a good machine and I like it. Of course I like Foundry's ServerIrons too but for a Cisco Switch, I really do like the 65xx. IDS is only part of the problem. The 65xx uses modules. I thought for sure Cisco would want engineers to know about how to configure the modules not only because it increases the value of the engineer but more importantly, it is useful in marketing and sales. Don't you want to promote the modules on the 65xxx They are really expensive and Cisco must make some good money off of them. The 3550 is what? Perhaps we can all buy one, I just saw 4 on e-bay, each for under $3000, but doesn't Cisco want to test us off of what many enterprises are using? I was at a Cisco Gold Partner company last year and they only recommended the 5xxx and then the 65xx. Of course many customers bought the 29xx but on the test there was the 5xxx-a modular switch. It just doesn't make sense. It looks too easy. But hey! It's your company! Of course it will be beneficial to me as a test-taker to have the 3550. I am just at a loss as to why Cisco is not putting the replacement switch on the test. Your commments Theo Larry Letterman 06/13/2002 02:33 PM To: , cc: Subject:RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] and why are you so distraught about no IDS..? other than the fact we all know your big on security. Its a basic l2/l3 switch for the lan switching part of the R/S lab, not the security lab... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Not on;y is TR going... [7:46391] I don't know about this thing. What is the real throughput I wonder. It says 24Gbbs switching fabric but I can't find a place where is says X Gbbs throughput Has anyone really ever tested one of these puppies? I would like to know if it can really take a beating without losing packets. And this thing can't do IDS! Why O why did they choose this thing? How about the Content Swiching Module? Does it have anything like this? I am looking at the page now and can't see anything promising. Man was someone sniffing acid when they suggested the switch and it wasn't IDS??? I would like to know if anyone has any experience with this with like 10 1-gig copper connections, all intensive traffic flows between various servers. I know the 6509 can take the pain without too much trouble. Can the 3550 really perform Theo Mark Odette II Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 12:14 PM Please respond to Mark Odette II To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
