Re: MPLS and QOS study materials for R&S Written [7:56099]
I used IP QOS from Ciscopress ISBN:1578701163 I relied on CCO for MPLS ""Jayagiri B Nair"" wrote in message news:200210221916.TAA17048@;groupstudy.com... > Hello friends, > > Please anybody could suggest the best books for mpls and qos topics for the > R&S written exam? > Any news about the new CCIE written exam?[from nov 4th?] > > Thanks and rgds > > jbnair Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56127&t=56099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
classfull [7:56126]
Hi group, Can somebody explain me what is classfull and classless network.Thanx in advance Kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56126&t=56126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Einstooge is now CCIE#10543 [7:56125]
I finally made it!!! later Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56125&t=56125 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isdn pri line issue [7:56124]
Hi all I have one PRI Line ( 30 channel ) and configured on my cisco 3662 router. I am dialing from remote router which has isdn bri lines terminated on different router like 1600 and 1750. These remotes are dialing into PRI line and all are able to connect at the same time. All this is happening over ppp by enabling multilink ppp. I want to do same over frame relay. In ppp we can enable multilink for multiple lines. but what should i do in frame relay for the same. Only one remote is able to dial at a time , and if 2nd try at that time , call get disc. Regards Lokesh Khanna Project Engineer Managed Network Services Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56124&t=56124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hardware for DS3 Connections [7:56094]
I forgot to mention that these will be frame circuits, not ATM or point-to-point. Thanks to you and to Dave Madland for clearing this up. Considering this hardware costs several times more than that required for T1 speeds and below, I don't want to screw up and find out about it later! John ""todd osterberg"" wrote in message news:200210230438.EAA07109@;groupstudy.com... > The adapters don't need to match in both routers. You can use HSSI in the > 3600 and T3 PA in the 7513. Are you provisioning the DS3s as ATM circuits? > If so, look at the ATM modules for 3600 series. I have had no problems using > the single port ATM NM on the 3640 chassis. > > Email me if you have other q's > > > Todd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56123&t=56094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hardware for DS3 Connections [7:56094]
The adapters don't need to match in both routers. You can use HSSI in the 3600 and T3 PA in the 7513. Are you provisioning the DS3s as ATM circuits? If so, look at the ATM modules for 3600 series. I have had no problems using the single port ATM NM on the 3640 chassis. Email me if you have other q's Todd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56122&t=56094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why my clock reset after reboot? [7:56120]
Hi.. Friends, I set the date and time on my cisco router using the following command Router#clock set 11:00:00 23 oct 2002 Router#wr mem The time did change when I type Router#sh clock but it was still reset to 00:00 1 March 1993 after reboot. How to make it stay permanently Thanks in advance _ Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56120&t=56120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX License Help! [7:56060]
50 == 50, not 50 == 80... 150+ users can be behind a PIX 501 with a 50 user license enablement, but only a maximum of 50 concurrent higher-security zone ip hosts can conduct communications across the "internet"/least-secure interface of the PIX. AFAIK, all other PIX models only have the restricted/unrestricted specification for connection licensing... and don't quote me on this, but I believe the Restricted License covers 10,000 concurrent connections through the "internet"/least-secure interface. -Mark -Original Message- From: Juli Hato [mailto:julihato@;hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX License Help! [7:56060] Helo all, Is it possible to have a 100 user and 80 user wanna go to Internet (passing through the PIX). Can 50-users license cover the 80-users to passing to the PIX? Best Regards, HATO >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: PIX License Help! [7:56060] >Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:39:17 -0400 > >The DHCP is for people who do not have a DHCP server on their network. At >some companies not everyone needs to go out on the internet. Therefore, 50 >users could and everyone on your 100 user network can get an ip address. >Remember licensing is pure profit. The unrestricted is the cheapest way in >the long run but it all depends on your budget as to how you want to go. > >Steve > >-Original Message- >From: Juli Hato [mailto:julihato@;hotmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:28 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: PIX License Help! [7:56060] > > >Dear Ciscoer, > >Just wanna know why Cisco PIX also has a user Licensing methode? >AFAIK Cisco only sell the Restricted and Unrestricted License. Can anyone >here explains for me? > >10-User License >The Cisco PIX 501 Firewall 10-user license supports up to 10 concurrent >source IP addresses from your internal network to traverse through the PIX >501. The integrated DHCP server supports up to 32 DHCP leases. > >50-User License >The Cisco PIX 501 Firewall 50-user license supports up to 50 concurrent >source IP addresses from your internal network to traverse through the PIX >501. The integrated DHCP server supports up to 128 DHCP leases. As your >needs grow, a 10-to-50 user upgrade license is also available, which allows >you to extend your investment in PIX 501 equipment. > >Best Regards, >HATO > > > > >_ >Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. >http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp _ Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56121&t=56060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX License Help! [7:56060]
Helo all, Is it possible to have a 100 user and 80 user wanna go to Internet (passing through the PIX). Can 50-users license cover the 80-users to passing to the PIX? Best Regards, HATO >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: PIX License Help! [7:56060] >Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:39:17 -0400 > >The DHCP is for people who do not have a DHCP server on their network. At >some companies not everyone needs to go out on the internet. Therefore, 50 >users could and everyone on your 100 user network can get an ip address. >Remember licensing is pure profit. The unrestricted is the cheapest way in >the long run but it all depends on your budget as to how you want to go. > >Steve > >-Original Message- >From: Juli Hato [mailto:julihato@;hotmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:28 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: PIX License Help! [7:56060] > > >Dear Ciscoer, > >Just wanna know why Cisco PIX also has a user Licensing methode? >AFAIK Cisco only sell the Restricted and Unrestricted License. Can anyone >here explains for me? > >10-User License >The Cisco PIX 501 Firewall 10-user license supports up to 10 concurrent >source IP addresses from your internal network to traverse through the PIX >501. The integrated DHCP server supports up to 32 DHCP leases. > >50-User License >The Cisco PIX 501 Firewall 50-user license supports up to 50 concurrent >source IP addresses from your internal network to traverse through the PIX >501. The integrated DHCP server supports up to 128 DHCP leases. As your >needs grow, a 10-to-50 user upgrade license is also available, which allows >you to extend your investment in PIX 501 equipment. > >Best Regards, >HATO > > > > >_ >Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. >http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp _ Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56119&t=56060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102]
>From CCO, Snapshot Routing : FAQ Snapshot allows the use of all "distance vector" routing protocols over DDR lines. They include: RIP and IGRP for IP RTMP for Appletalk RIP and SAP for IPX RTP for Vines -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102] Hello, Can snapshot routing be used for Eigrp? I don't see any documentation on CCO regarding this. They refer to primarily RIP, IGRP and IPX RIP. What can be used for Eigrp across a DDR link? Also, I am trying to find out for ISIS? CCO has the ospf-demand circuit for Ospf but nothing for ISIS? Can someone advise? Thank you. Sincerely. _ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56118&t=56102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918]
Harold, >From my quick look at this product, it seems to use DNS changes for failover onto another ISP and keeping connectivity. It works different than how BGP would for redundancy, with some limitations. BTW. How much does this product cost? Regards, Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Harold Monroe Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918] You might want to check out this company www.fatpipeinc.com We have two T1's load balanced (with two different providers - XO & WorldCom) using their hardware/software device and no BGP needed! -Original Message- From: Brian (273954) [mailto:brian@;nextmill.net] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 5:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918] We are bringing in a second DS3 line into our Cisco 7206 v12 router and was hoping for some general advise. Our current provider is a 9mbps DS3 from Genuity. We are bringing in a seconds DS3 from PAJO at 6mbps for redundancy and to bring the usage down on the Genuity line. My question is what commands do I need to look into when I have the BGP4 setup on the router in order to handle the flow of traffic properly? 90% of our traffic is OUTBOUND (up to the internet) and we need to balance this traffic between the 9mbps and 6mbps connections. From what I am told this won't be an automatic process but something I will have to tweak on occation depending on if traffic demands change between the connections. How am I best going to control this outbound flow of traffic? My idea was that when one connection is using a high % I can manually modify a metric of some sort to make the router believe that that connection is not as preferred as it once was and start sending a little of the traffic over the other connection instead. Am I being realistic here? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56117&t=55918 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049]
Damn phones, Don't they make you feel stupid sometimes. Great work Larry. jb -Original Message- From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:Larry.Roberts@;expanets.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:57 AM To: John Brandis Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049] The Fix was to run a newer version of code on the phones. We swapped to p00303020213 and that fixed it, or so it appears. We will know more after testing tomorrow. Larry -Original Message- From: John Brandis [mailto:john.brandis@;solution6.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:26 PM To: 'Roberts, Larry' Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049] My problem which is hopefully something to look into, was that there was a config on the phones themselves that played havoc with what I was telling the switch to do. Hopefully this will solve your problems as it does not , according to your config and what TAC suggests, and issue with the config of the 4006. -Original Message- From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:Larry.Roberts@;expanets.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:21 PM To: John Brandis Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049] Running Cisco 7960's and some Avaya phones as well, although I don't know their model number. I don't remember what I did to help, but glad I could do it! If I come up with an answer I will let you know.. Larry -Original Message- From: John Brandis [mailto:john.brandis@;solution6.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:39 PM To: 'Roberts, Larry' Subject: RE: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049] I am very interested as I just purchased a 4006 to do the exact same setup. Whats the phone type you are using, hopefully not a NEC ? John Sydney, Australia Ps: thanks for helping with my VoIP issues last month. -Original Message- From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:Larry.Roberts@;expanets.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4006 IP Phone DHCP problem [7:56049] Hey folks, Im hoping that one of you can help me with a problem. I have a 4006 with a SUPIII running 2 VLAN's. The Data VLAN is VLAN 1 and the Voice VLAN is VLAN 200. I have a DHCP server on VLAN 1 with the proper scopes defined. My problem is that the phone is getting a VLAN 1 ip address, not a VLAN 200. Standard IP phone config: interface FastEthernet x/x description IP Phone switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 200 no snmp trap link-status spanning-tree portfast Now if I hardcode the switchport to VLAN 200 with a switchport access vlan 200 and switchport mode access, it works fine. I did a debug on the SUPIII and I see the bootp request come in on VLAN 200, and I can see the SUP III set the GIADDR to the VLAN 200 address. I had the onsite tech take a look at the phone, and it see's itself as on VLAN 200, so I don't understand why the request is being met with a VLAN 1 ip. I know that the scopes are correct because hard coding the interface makes it work. I know that the VLAN interface configuration is correct because it works when the port is hard coded to the correct interface. I suspected that CEF was preventing the router from setting the GIADDR of the packet, but debug shows it doing it so now I am lost. I tried the standard " no ip route-cache / mroute-cache " but that hasn't helped. I don't know if it's a software bug or what, but I am at a loss. Anybody done this before ? I have several 3500's running this configuration and they work fine, so I am beginning to wonder if it isn't in the SUP III that is causing the issue. Perhaps it says its rewriting the GIADDR, but its not. IOS used: System image file is "bootflash:cat4000-is-mz.121-12c.EW.bin" Any help/thoughts/verbal abuse is appreciated. I have a TAC case open to see what I'm doing wrong, but they aren't seeing anything config wise being the problem so I thought I would try the experts over here. Thanks Larry ** visit http://www.solution6.com UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56116&t=56049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure viol
ISDN Backup for Frame-Relay [7:56114]
Hi guys, I need some advice on ISDN backup for Frame-Relay. How should I do if have 4 ISDN BRI and I want to configure each ISDN BRI as a backup for two sites each which use Frame-Relay. Means 4 ISDN BRI for 8 sites? Thank in advance Syam _ Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56114&t=56114 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IP TCP Intercept [7:56103]
You can choose to operate TCP intercept in watch mode, as opposed to intercept mode. In watch mode, the software passively watches the connection requests flowing through the router. If a connection fails to get established in a configurable interval, the software intervenes and terminates the connection attempt by sending a RESET to the server. After enabling tcp intercept, use the "ip tcp intercept mode watch" comamnd to say you want watch mode, and then use "ip tcp intercept watch-timeout seconds" to set how long the router should watch a half-open connection before terminating it. With this method, you would protect the server from keeping connections open for a long time (you mentioned 2.5 minutes) due to a hacker sending a SYN request but never completing the three-way handshake. In a lot of cases, the hacker is using a spoofed address and never sees the SYN ACK, so it doesn't send the final ACK. The hacker doesn't care. He's already done his damage by bugging the server and causing the server to keep a connection half open. You would also close a legitmate half-open connection where the client took that long to send the final ACK, but that's probably OK. It's unlikely that a legtimate and properly functioning client would take that long, so you wouldn't be closing much that you shouldn't close. If that's not what you had in mind, please rewrite your question. It's a bit hard to understand as written. Thanks. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Robert Massiache wrote: > > Hi, > I know to avoid syn attacks we can beef up the security by > setting the time > using 'tcp intercept' command. It has got 2 modes 'intercept' > and watch > mode. > > My requirement is that there is a hacker who use SYN to attack > the server > 150.100.1.254. I need to configure R1 to protect the server. > Tunning on R1, > I need closing the tcp connections even the legitimate ones > which are open > after 2.5 min. > > How can I employ the above command here? Could someone help me > out... > > thanks > > _ > Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56115&t=56103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: does BCMSN include LANE [7:56051]
I passed BCMSN almost two years ago and there wasn't a lick of LANE in sight. 10/100/1000 ethernet and layer three switching have pretty much slain every lick of ATM/Token Ring out there and Cisco's exams reflect the changes in the market. Today I walked in to a place to do an eval and I found Cabletron ATM+TR ... first time I've seen it in production in at least three years and part of the deal is to yank the stuff out and replace it with ethernet. Aaron Ajello wrote: > > I would trust the cisco web site and go with what it says is featured on the > exam. From what I have seen, what it notes on the web site is accurate to > what is on the test. > I used 504 books to pass the 604 test, so I don't think too much changed. -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:neallist@;wispair.net fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56113&t=56051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: run VoIP on a frame network at BIR instead of [7:55833]
Hi Jenny, Is your carrier Telstra ? Do you use Telstra TPIPS for your cloud/next hop router ? John Sydney, Australia -Original Message- From: Jenny McLeod [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: run VoIP on a frame network at BIR instead of [7:55833] Depends on the frame switch, I think. I asked our telco about this as well (quite a while ago), and they said that on entry to the "cloud", they automatically reset any DE bits set. So either way, your scheme isn't likely to work, but how much of a negative effect it has will depend on whether your telco drops entering DE packets or just resets the DE bits. JMcL Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > This was Cisco's old theory. In theory, it would work, but in > reality, if the frame switch saw a packet come into it's ingress > interface with the > packet already marked DE, it will drop it because it was > unexpected. > > I asked the telco's your question last year and that's the answer they > gave me. Cisco seems to have abandoned that theory a while ago, > which is > probably why you haven't seen it written anywhere. > > > ""dj"" wrote in message news:200210171534.PAA26762@;groupstudy.com... > > Running a VoIP application over a frame-relay network with > 256k CIR and > > 512k BIR. From the LLQ docs I reviewed, to guarantee good > voice > > quality, traffic shaping all frame traffic to CIR is > recommended along > > with LLQ of voice packets. > > > > Would like to take advantage of BIR bandwidth and still > guarantee voice > > packets are not dropped by the frame relay switch network when > > congestion occurs. Here are my thoughts: > > > > What if the router were to pre-mark all data packets as > "Discard > > Eligible" (DE) on the outbound serial interface connected to > the frame > > network. Voice packets would NOT be marked DE. Then run up > to BIR > > rates with LLQ prioritization for voice. Would the carrier > frame network > > switches drop only the pre-marked DE data packets (by the > router) when > > congestion occurred and NOT drop any voice packets? I > haven't found any > > Cisco links that addressed QOS in this fashion. Any links on > this topic > > would be greatly appreciated. > > > > The objective is to squeeze more bandwidth (BIR vs CIR) out > of your > > frame relay network without dropping any voice packets. Why > would this > > not work and what are the caveats? > > > > regards, > > dj ** visit http://www.solution6.com UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56112&t=55833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN-dialer watch help.. [7:56055]
I'm not quite clear on what your criteria are, but it sounds like floating static routes might suit you (and change the idle-timeout value for the ISDN to ten minutes). Floating static routes are routes with a high administrative distance, that are normally overridden by another route (usually dynamic, I assume static is also fine) pointing to your leased line. If the leased line goes down, that route becomes inactive, and the floating static route (pointing to the ISDN) takes over. You will need to define interesting traffic. JMcL Parameswaran S wrote: > > Hi Group, > > Pls.help me in this requirement > > I want to bring up my isdn backup as soon as my Leased > Line(primary) goes down .and it should be disconnected if there > is no traffic flow for 10 minitues . > > I hope the only way of bringing up the backup interface for > this purpose is using dialer watch which does not require any > interested traffic to initiate the call,But will it work if i > have any static routes specified already?And i understand isdn > will be up untill the LL is coming up when you use dialer > watch.(Correct me if am wrong) ideally which will not solve > my purpose. > > So if i configure the router using DDR with backup delay , it > will make my backup link protocol up and will not initiate the > call unless there is any interested traffic.. > > how do i go about this ? any ideas.. > > Regards, > > Paramesh > > > > - > Do you Yahoo!? > Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56111&t=56055 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: run VoIP on a frame network at BIR instead of [7:55833]
Depends on the frame switch, I think. I asked our telco about this as well (quite a while ago), and they said that on entry to the "cloud", they automatically reset any DE bits set. So either way, your scheme isn't likely to work, but how much of a negative effect it has will depend on whether your telco drops entering DE packets or just resets the DE bits. JMcL Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > This was Cisco's old theory. In theory, it would work, but in > reality, if > the frame switch saw a packet come into it's ingress interface > with the > packet already marked DE, it will drop it because it was > unexpected. > > I asked the telco's your question last year and that's the > answer they gave > me. Cisco seems to have abandoned that theory a while ago, > which is > probably why you haven't seen it written anywhere. > > > ""dj"" wrote in message > news:200210171534.PAA26762@;groupstudy.com... > > Running a VoIP application over a frame-relay network with > 256k CIR and > > 512k BIR. From the LLQ docs I reviewed, to guarantee good > voice > > quality, traffic shaping all frame traffic to CIR is > recommended along > > with LLQ of voice packets. > > > > Would like to take advantage of BIR bandwidth and still > guarantee voice > > packets are not dropped by the frame relay switch network when > > congestion occurs. Here are my thoughts: > > > > What if the router were to pre-mark all data packets as > "Discard > > Eligible" (DE) on the outbound serial interface connected to > the frame > > network. Voice packets would NOT be marked DE. Then run up > to BIR > > rates with LLQ prioritization for voice. Would the carrier > frame network > > switches drop only the pre-marked DE data packets (by the > router) when > > congestion occurred and NOT drop any voice packets? I > haven't found any > > Cisco links that addressed QOS in this fashion. Any links on > this topic > > would be greatly appreciated. > > > > The objective is to squeeze more bandwidth (BIR vs CIR) out > of your > > frame relay network without dropping any voice packets. Why > would this > > not work and what are the caveats? > > > > regards, > > dj > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56110&t=55833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ospf adj problem over fa int [7:56109]
hi groups i am try to connect 2 ospf area via bvi int (fa) R1---(OA0)-R3---(OA1)-R2---OA0 BVI R1 area 1 virtual-link 10.0.0.2 R2 area 1 virtual-link 10.0.0.1 but R1 and R1 can not see each other and R2 getting lots of erorr %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: mismatch area ID, from backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from 10.0.0.3, BVI1 ,should i point area virtual-link to BVI int ? ,can a tunnel be using hear ? R1 and R2 can ping each other through BVI. thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56109&t=56109 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102]
A minor nitpick here: EIGRP is not a link state protocol but it does use hello messages to establish and keep track of neighbors. Hello messages used by a routing protocol will complicate your DDR situation, but they are not the defining characteristic of link state protocols. John >>> "Symon Thurlow" 10/22/02 3:05:08 PM >>> I don't think you can use Link State routing protocols over snapshot because they rely on hello messages periodically (not 100% on this but pretty sure). I got it to work in a DDR EIGRP environment using floating statics, quite straight forward. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:cisconuts@;hotmail.com] Sent: 22 October 2002 21:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102] Hello, Can snapshot routing be used for Eigrp? I don't see any documentation on CCO regarding this. They refer to primarily RIP, IGRP and IPX RIP. What can be used for Eigrp across a DDR link? Also, I am trying to find out for ISIS? CCO has the ospf-demand circuit for Ospf but nothing for ISIS? Can someone advise? Thank you. Sincerely. _ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56108&t=56102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102]
Woops, That second sentence was misleading, I didn't mean I got snapshot with EIGRP to work, I used floating static's instead of Snapshot. -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow Sent: 22 October 2002 22:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102] I don't think you can use Link State routing protocols over snapshot because they rely on hello messages periodically (not 100% on this but pretty sure). I got it to work in a DDR EIGRP environment using floating statics, quite straight forward. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:cisconuts@;hotmail.com] Sent: 22 October 2002 21:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102] Hello, Can snapshot routing be used for Eigrp? I don't see any documentation on CCO regarding this. They refer to primarily RIP, IGRP and IPX RIP. What can be used for Eigrp across a DDR link? Also, I am trying to find out for ISIS? CCO has the ospf-demand circuit for Ospf but nothing for ISIS? Can someone advise? Thank you. Sincerely. _ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56107&t=56102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GLBP [7:56050]
""David C Prall"" wrote in message ... > GLBP would be used where you have two live WAN links, and wish to use both > of them. As with HSRP and VRRP you would have a standby interface configured > and use this as the default gateway. Based on an ARP request for the Default > Gateway, the two systems will hash the requesting MAC Address and one of > them will answer the ARP request. Thus half of the clients will use one > router and the other half will use the other. Based on load on each, who > answers will be dynamically updated. I don't believe GLBP is currently > available in a release posted to CCO. One of my customers was on the Early > Field Trials and it worked well. It sounds most useful when you have core switches in an internet data center (e.g. Catalyst 6500/MSFC), especially when you have 4 cores (or 6/8/etc cores). Also might be useful when using CatOS/MSFC IOS hybrid with dual SUP's on just two core switches (because then you have 4 routers participating). Since SupIOS has pretty much taken over, I don't think you would see too many of these environments, unless they are implementing it because of the redundancy features (or CWDM features) of CatOS. Some of the key engineers inside Cisco specialized on the Catalyst 6500 platform have been recommending against CatOS for Layer-3 anything recently on some mailing-lists like cisco-nsp. I would also tend to concur with these statements. The WAN situation doesn't make any sense to me. That's what BGP-4 is for. I assume GLBP will probably have a track feature like HSRP for WAN related failover. I don't find that all too useful, but I guess it's nice for some people. You say that the two systems (routers?) hash the MAC address and then one answers? I thought that GLBP worked by having the main (primary) router respond with the other router's virtual MAC address (like HSRP but with 2 virtual MAC's instead of one). Which is true? I believe that the problem GLBP is trying to solve is ease of organizational ability plus redundancy/load-balancing in IDC environments. Instead of setting up VLAN's so that every other VLAN is STP/HSRP primary (staggered odd and evens, for example), you can use GLBP to balance client connections to their gateways. I'm sure it has plenty of other uses, as well. I also wonder if it suffers from the horrific security problems that HSRP has (and that VRRP has as well, but fortunately, RFC 2338 specifies "IP authentication with MD5 HMAC"). Luckily, there are two fixes to the HSRP problem: 1) Run IPSec from one control plane to another (e.g. between MSFC's), and 2) Set all HSRP participating router's priorities to 255 and allocate gateway addresses from the most significant bits of your prefixes (e.g. a /24's VIP would be 255, active HSRP - 254, standby - 253, etc). Yet another reason to standarize using your most significant bits as the infrastructure addresses instead of the customer/user addresses (the other one being the fact that most users instinctively choose the least significant bit and you end up with IP collisions). -dre Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56106&t=56050 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PCMCIA Flash [7:53866]
Hello, W2K and XP recognize CISCO flash cards without any problems, what do you need - drivers, which you can download from internet. As soon as drivers will be installed you can start to use your flash card as a removable HD. Regards Igor ""Steven Greeno"" wrote in message news:200209222114.VAA12315@;groupstudy.com... > Is there any way to copy images to the PC-Card based Flash using a laptop, > either with a special card reader or using software and the PC-Card slot on > a laptop? I am just curious if I could copy IOS images for distribution to > the Flash card using my laptop then take card to the devices and load IOS > version. (In situations where TFTP isn't feasible or the best option.) > > Thanks. > steven Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56105&t=53866 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102]
I don't think you can use Link State routing protocols over snapshot because they rely on hello messages periodically (not 100% on this but pretty sure). I got it to work in a DDR EIGRP environment using floating statics, quite straight forward. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:cisconuts@;hotmail.com] Sent: 22 October 2002 21:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102] Hello, Can snapshot routing be used for Eigrp? I don't see any documentation on CCO regarding this. They refer to primarily RIP, IGRP and IPX RIP. What can be used for Eigrp across a DDR link? Also, I am trying to find out for ISIS? CCO has the ospf-demand circuit for Ospf but nothing for ISIS? Can someone advise? Thank you. Sincerely. _ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56104&t=56102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP TCP Intercept [7:56103]
Hi, I know to avoid syn attacks we can beef up the security by setting the time using 'tcp intercept' command. It has got 2 modes 'intercept' and watch mode. My requirement is that there is a hacker who use SYN to attack the server 150.100.1.254. I need to configure R1 to protect the server. Tunning on R1, I need closing the tcp connections even the legitimate ones which are open after 2.5 min. How can I employ the above command here? Could someone help me out... thanks _ Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56103&t=56103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Snapshot routing for Eigrp? [7:56102]
Hello, Can snapshot routing be used for Eigrp? I don't see any documentation on CCO regarding this. They refer to primarily RIP, IGRP and IPX RIP. What can be used for Eigrp across a DDR link? Also, I am trying to find out for ISIS? CCO has the ospf-demand circuit for Ospf but nothing for ISIS? Can someone advise? Thank you. Sincerely. _ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56102&t=56102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS and QOS study materials for R&S Written [7:56101]
Hello friends, Please anybody could suggest the best books for mpls and qos topics for the R&S written exam? Any news about the new CCIE written exam?[from nov 4th?] Thanks and rgds jbnair Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56101&t=56101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco IDS [7:56100]
Dear All, I am looking to purchase Cisco IDS next week. Anyone implemented this yet? thanks in advance, -Kevin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56100&t=56100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS and QOS study materials for R&S Written [7:56099]
Hello friends, Please anybody could suggest the best books for mpls and qos topics for the R&S written exam? Any news about the new CCIE written exam?[from nov 4th?] Thanks and rgds jbnair Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56099&t=56099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE R&S WRITTEN STUDY PARTNER IN FREMONT, [7:54491]
Hello rookie, I am also studying for the R&S written.Planning to write in December. I have 2504[1 no],2524[3 nos],1601[1],1750[1],2620[1],3620[1] and 4000[1].switches Cat5000[2 nos] and 1900[1 no]. It will be great to share the knowledge with you. Best rgds jbnair Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56098&t=54491 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918]
You might want to check out this company www.fatpipeinc.com We have two T1's load balanced (with two different providers - XO & WorldCom) using their hardware/software device and no BGP needed! -Original Message- From: Brian (273954) [mailto:brian@;nextmill.net] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 5:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918] We are bringing in a second DS3 line into our Cisco 7206 v12 router and was hoping for some general advise. Our current provider is a 9mbps DS3 from Genuity. We are bringing in a seconds DS3 from PAJO at 6mbps for redundancy and to bring the usage down on the Genuity line. My question is what commands do I need to look into when I have the BGP4 setup on the router in order to handle the flow of traffic properly? 90% of our traffic is OUTBOUND (up to the internet) and we need to balance this traffic between the 9mbps and 6mbps connections. From what I am told this won't be an automatic process but something I will have to tweak on occation depending on if traffic demands change between the connections. How am I best going to control this outbound flow of traffic? My idea was that when one connection is using a high % I can manually modify a metric of some sort to make the router believe that that connection is not as preferred as it once was and start sending a little of the traffic over the other connection instead. Am I being realistic here? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56097&t=55918 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF and static routes [7:56030]
Adam Broad wrote: > > Thanks, Priscilla,, > I added the redistribute static command and that did fix the > problem. > I am still a little confused as to how it works as it says that > this command will only work with classful routing, What says that? I could imagine a problem of trying to redistribute a static route into a classful routing protocol such as RIP or IGRP if the static had a longer prefix for the same major network that is in the RIP or IGRP domain... I don't think you would have a problem redistributing into OSPF in this case though. You might have to add the subnet keyword though. Of course, redistribution has all sorts of issues. See the messages from Chuck, the Long and Winding Road, or, as I know him, The Redistribution King. :-) Anyway, the proof is that it works in your case! That's good to hear. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com > yet I am > using a subnet 172.19.99.0 255.255.255.0 but it did get added > into the > OSPF > process!? > > thanks again, > > -Original Message- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 17:59 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OSPF and static routes [7:56030] > > > Did you add the redistribute static command to the OSPF process > on > Router2? > That should help. There could be other trickier issues with > classful > versus > classless, etc., but hopefully the fix is just to add the > redistribute > static command. > ___ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com > www.priscilla.com > > Adam Broad wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > I have an OSPF query which has been causing me a headache, > > I have two 2610 routers on the LAN > > > > Router1 is joined to a large Frame relay network running > OSPF. > > > > Router2 is participating in the OSPF network but also has two > > ISDN links > > to remote sites. > > I have put in static routes to these networks onto router2. I > > have > > enabled ospf on the ethernet0 interface > > and this is working no problem and I can ping from this router > > across > > (through router1) the Frame Relay network to anywhere. However > > Router1 > > is not receiving information about my remote sites so cannot > > ping them. > > The ISDN links are unnumbered and are using dialers. > > > > Do I need to number the links? > > Should the OSPF not take all my routing table (Including any > > static > > routes) from router2 and send the info onto Router1? > > Do I have to enable any OSPF commands on the Dialer > interfaces? > > > > Any help much appreciated, > > > > A Broad > > > > > > FRAME > > > RELAY-ROUTER1-LANROUTER2--ISDN > > to 2 remote sites > > > > AREA10--AREA10--AREA10 > > > > -10.0.0.1-- > > 10.0.0.2-Unnumbered > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56096&t=56030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: does BCMSN include LANE [7:56051]
I would trust the cisco web site and go with what it says is featured on the exam. From what I have seen, what it notes on the web site is accurate to what is on the test. I used 504 books to pass the 604 test, so I don't think too much changed. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56095&t=56051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hardware for DS3 Connections [7:56094]
I've never had to deal with DS3 connections before and I'm a little bit lost. All of my local Cisco contacts are out of the office today so I thought I'd ask this here. I need to connect a 7513 to a 3662 via point-to-point DS3 and I'm not sure what hardware I need. It appears that my only option on the 3662 side is a HSSI interface. The 7513 has HSSI and T3 port adapters available. My first question is this: can I have HSSI on one side and the T3 port adapter on the other or would I need to get HSSI interfaces on both ends? I know I'm demonstrating my ignorance here but I've never had to order anything larger than a T1. :-) Any helpful info would be appreciated! Thanks, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56094&t=56094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GLBP [7:56050]
GLBP would be used where you have two live WAN links, and wish to use both of them. As with HSRP and VRRP you would have a standby interface configured and use this as the default gateway. Based on an ARP request for the Default Gateway, the two systems will hash the requesting MAC Address and one of them will answer the ARP request. Thus half of the clients will use one router and the other half will use the other. Based on load on each, who answers will be dynamically updated. I don't believe GLBP is currently available in a release posted to CCO. One of my customers was on the Early Field Trials and it worked well. -- David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of > Brett > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: GLBP [7:56050] > > > Does anyone know anything about the GLBP protocol and how to configure > it on the 2600 platform? I'm curious about the benefits over HSRP. It > looks like you can have several Ethernet interfaces point at one virtual > interface, is that true? What are the configuration commands? > Any guidance is greatly appreciated. > Thanks, > > b. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56093&t=56050 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP IRDP Feature? [7:56063]
At 8:49 AM + 10/22/02, Nigel Taylor wrote: >Robert, >The first thing I would suggest reading is rfc 1256, which >outlines the various extensions used by ICMP, which in turn is used by >ICMP-RDP. > >http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1256.txt?number=1256 > >Cisco makes notable use of IDRP in their MobileIP implementation. That >would be a good place begin looking from an operational perspective. > >HTH > >Nigel In the real world, and even in the lab if you don't want long periods of doing nothing, do remember that the default RFC timer values are far too long to be useful. Look at what you are doing, and set them to a much shorter interval. To review, there are several IPv4 ways of finding the active (if there is more than one) local router, of which IDRP is one: IDRP (can get a list of routers). DHCP/static configuration with HSRP, including overlapping groups if supported (probably best way to load-share) Passive RIP (I suppose you could use other routing protocols in passive mode, but I've never seen it done in the real world -- nor can think of a very good reason to do it). > >- Original Message - >From: "Robert Massiache" >To: >Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:55 AM >Subject: IP IRDP Feature? [7:56063] > > >> Hi, >> I do not understand where exactly and in what context do we enable this >> service on the interfaces. Could someone explain me... >> >> I would appreciate you help. >> > > thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56092&t=56063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Asking for a command for dialer interface [7:56074]
Hai, Can this work ? interface dialer9 ip address 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 ip address negotiated encaps ppp ppp auth pap thanks -Original Message- From: Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/22/02 6:38 PM Subject: Asking for a command for dialer interface [7:56074] Hai, I need to find a command that allow my interface dialer with a fix ip to accept another ip once the ISDN connection is establish. I have no idea about it and I am looking at the CCO for help. This command will allow my interface dialer ip to be changed to another set off ip, in order to access some data from a third party vendor. In oreder for me to dial in, the vendor only recognized one particular ip which i have put inside my interface dialer. Then once connected the radius/dhcp sever over the other side will assing another set off ip. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56077&t=56074 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MRTG [7:56076]
Hi Shilpa. MRTG is (was) a great tool to make nice graphs for nearly everything. You should find everything on http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/ BUT... There is a much more advanced tool for this purpose called RRDtool which is much more extensible: http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/ you can use it in combination with Cricket http://cricket.sourceforge.net/ to get very nice looking graphs. Best regards, Oliver shilpa sagte: > Hi everybody > > Has anyone got hands on experience in configuring mrtg on for cisco > switches??... if yes then kindly give me some good references > > Regards > Shilpa > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Oliver Hensel telematis Netzwerke GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Siemensstrasse 23, D-76275 Ettlingen Tel: +49 (0) 7243/5050-557, Fax: 5050-592 visit us: http://telematis.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56082&t=56076 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NTP server again !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:55836]
Another possibility would be using the "original" ntp service. Look at http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ Precompiled software under the software/Windows NT section. Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY > -Original Message- > From: Jens von B|low [mailto:jens@;nha.co.za] > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: NTP server again !! [7:55836] > > > Hi, > > Try this > > Enable NTP Time Server (Windows 2000/XP) > http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/1117/ > > This setting is used to enable the local machine to act as a > Network Time > Protocol (NTP) server. When enabled other machines can > synchronise their > clocks with this machine. > > Regards > Jens Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56081&t=55836 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP question. [7:55944]
Hello. When the problem happened, I already tried to do the point number 1 and 2 but anything change, the problem was not solved. So I and sending following my currently BGP configuration: router bgp A no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network X.X.X.X mask 255.255.240.0 network Y.Y.Y.Y mask 255.255.240.0 aggregate-address Z.Z.Z.Z 255.255.224.0 summary-only traffic-share min across-interfaces neighbor Provider1 peer-group neighbor Provider1 remote-as . neighbor Provider1 ebgp-multihop 2 neighbor Provider1 update-source Loopback0 neighbor Provider1 version 4 neighbor Provider1 route-map Provider1-PREPEND-ENTRADA in neighbor Provider1 filter-list 10 out neighbor Provider3 peer-group neighbor Provider3 remote-as . neighbor Provider3 ebgp-multihop 2 neighbor Provider3 update-source Loopback0 neighbor Provider3 version 4 neighbor Provider3 route-map Provider3-PREPEND-ENTRADA in neighbor Provider3 filter-list 10 out neighbor Provider2 peer-group neighbor Provider2 remote-as . neighbor Provider2 ebgp-multihop 2 neighbor Provider2 update-source Loopback0 neighbor Provider2 version 4 neighbor Provider2 filter-list 10 out neighbor loopback1 peer-group Provider1 neighbor Loopback2 peer-group Provider2 neighbor c.c.c.c remote-as . ***(FOR IBGP) neighbor l.l.l.l remote-as . ***(FOR IBGP) neighbor Loopback3 peer-group Provider3 maximum-paths 5 Thanks for your help. Josi Pinal. >From: "YASSER ALY" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: BGP question. [7:55944] >Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:57:12 + > _ Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free! Try MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp Received: from 217.139.43.65 by lw4fd.law4.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:57:12 GMT X-Originating-IP: [217.139.43.65] From: "YASSER ALY" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP question. [7:55944] Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:57:12 + Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by GroupStudy.com 1- Try to remove the prepending you did and see whether things will come back to normal or not. 2- If it came back to normal condition then check the way you are configuring this route-map and discuss it with your ISP to get more feedback from him The processor & memory readings you provided are encouraging so it shouldn't be an issue with the router itself. Finally if nothing worked out paste your config to the group maybe someone can point the configuration problem - if any - >From: "Jose Tomas Pinal Salvador" > >Hello Study Group. > >Currently I have 3 differents BGP sesions establish with 3 differents >providers. Each provider announce me about 115400 prefixs. Yesterday I was >making traffic load balacing between then, using the prepend comand such >others days (this actions are doing often in order to use the BW properly), >when I tried to apply the comand prepend and after the command clear ip bgp >(loopback provider) soft in/out to reset soft the prefix of the provider #2 >everything was ok for the first 20 minutes but after the traffic acrooss >the provider #2 was down about 80%. > >Following, I could see with the comand sh ip bgp sum, that this provider >only could announce me about 2 prefix, no more and the BGP sesion with >them started to be intermitent. With debug command I got it the following: > >40w3d: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.49.192.5 Down BGP Notification sent >40w3d: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 206.49.192.5 4/0 (hold time >expired) 0 bytes >40w3d: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.49.192.5 Up >40w3d: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.49.192.5 Down BGP Notification sent >40w3d: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 206.49.192.5 4/0 (hold time >expired) 0 bytes >40w3d: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.49.192.5 Up > >The provider and me started to do some troubleshooting and in his router he >could see that all the prefix keep on in queque and my router was not allow >to get the rest of the prefix. > >So, it is looks like a memory problem but my router have 60% free memory(sh >proc memo) and 39%cpu utilization(5 minutes, sh proc cpu).The provider >router have about the same numbers. > >Note:I have a Cisco Router 7513, IOS version 12.1.(6)E. > >I will aprecciate your helps. >Thanks very much. >Sorry for my english is not my native lenguages. >Josi Pinal. > > > > > > > >_ >Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online >http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56080&t=55944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and No
RE: HDLC STAC Compression [7:56073]
What router models did you enable it on, and what sort of traffic goes over the link? -Original Message- From: Metin YILDIZLI [mailto:metin@;sekom.com.tr] Sent: 22 October 2002 12:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HDLC STAC Compression [7:56073] I have applied that command on Cisco Router in a live network. It increases bandwidth that 64k to 128 Kbps. I have tested it works by ping response times and file transfer. It really works... Tim Champion wrote: >Is anyone out there using STAC compression on HDLC links in a live >network? If so what is the maximum speed link you would apply it to and >has it brought significant benefits. > >Many thanks in advance > >Tim Champion -- Metin YILDIZLI SEKOM Iletisim Sistemleri Fulya Mahallesi Akincibayiri Sokak No:10/1 Mecidiyekvy /ISTANBUL Tel: (90) 212 2889352 Fax: (90) 212 2674961 = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56079&t=56073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MRTG [7:56076]
Apart from the obvious, I have found the following to be of much use. comp.dcom.net-management which I normally browse at the folloing URL http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr =&safe=off&group=comp.dcom.net-management HTH Dom Stocqueler. "shilpa" cc: Sent by: Subject: MRTG [7:56076] nobody@groupstud y.com 22/10/2002 12:23 PM Please respond to "shilpa" Hi everybody Has anyone got hands on experience in configuring mrtg on for cisco switches??... if yes then kindly give me some good references Regards Shilpa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56078&t=56076 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MRTG [7:56076]
Hi everybody Has anyone got hands on experience in configuring mrtg on for cisco switches??... if yes then kindly give me some good references Regards Shilpa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56076&t=56076 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HDLC STAC Compression [7:56073]
I have applied that command on Cisco Router in a live network. It increases bandwidth that 64k to 128 Kbps. I have tested it works by ping response times and file transfer. It really works... Tim Champion wrote: >Is anyone out there using STAC compression on HDLC links in a live network? >If so what is the maximum speed link you would apply it to and has it >brought significant benefits. > >Many thanks in advance > >Tim Champion -- Metin YILDIZLI SEKOM Iletisim Sistemleri Fulya Mahallesi Akincibayiri Sokak No:10/1 Mecidiyekvy /ISTANBUL Tel: (90) 212 2889352 Fax: (90) 212 2674961 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56075&t=56073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asking for a command for dialer interface [7:56074]
Hai, I need to find a command that allow my interface dialer with a fix ip to accept another ip once the ISDN connection is establish. I have no idea about it and I am looking at the CCO for help. This command will allow my interface dialer ip to be changed to another set off ip, in order to access some data from a third party vendor. In oreder for me to dial in, the vendor only recognized one particular ip which i have put inside my interface dialer. Then once connected the radius/dhcp sever over the other side will assing another set off ip. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56074&t=56074 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HDLC STAC Compression [7:56073]
Is anyone out there using STAC compression on HDLC links in a live network? If so what is the maximum speed link you would apply it to and has it brought significant benefits. Many thanks in advance Tim Champion Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56073&t=56073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X.25 [7:55369]
HI, all Thnaks for the help.It has workd. - Original Message - From: "Osama Kamal" To: Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 1:54 PM Subject: RE: X.25 [7:55369] > Try to remove the x25 address from each interface and remove the current > routes, the new routes should reflect the actual physical connectivity for > example: > > x25 route interface Serial2/0 > x25 route 4401 interface Serial2/1 > x25 route interface Serial2/3 > . > > ... > > > Osama Kamal > > -Original Message- > From: Niraj somaiya [mailto:niraj.somaiya@;nirmaldatacomm.com] > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: X.25 [7:55369] > > HI all > > NEED YOUR HELP URGENTLY!!!ANY X.25 EXPERTS LISTENING.. > I have installed cisco 3640 as an x.25 switch at one of our customer > place.Im > using X.21 DCE cable which is connected to NM-8A/S.And ach port is giving a > clock of 64K.to the device attached to this.This devices are MSC's(Mobile > switch's) and SUN machines with X.21 interface. > > This router has replaced traditional X.25 switch.All the parameters on the > ports are OK and the interface are coming up.If u see the config of 3640,on > port 2/2 one OMP machine(basically sun machine)which acts as a console is > connected.From this console,it makes X.25 calls to MSC switches i.e to all > other ports. > > Since i have configured router as a switch,from that console i should be > able > to make X.25 call to all of the port.But its not happening.Im just able to > make a call to one single interface whose route is the 1st route and the > other > x.25 calls to other ports are not happening.If u see the 1st route the > destination add. is .So the 1st call happens successfully but second > call > to another add.i.e to another port is not happening.But if i remove that 1st > route and then try to make a call to which was a second route earlier > and > now the 1st one,the call establishes. > > Please suggest as to what should be added in x25 routing. > > The main intention is that from ,Console which is connected to se2/2 shoule > be > able to make x.25 call to all other ports. > > Config is attached. > > > > sh runn > Building configuration... > > Current configuration : 1910 bytes > ! > version 12.2 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname bp > ! > enable password cisco > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > ! > x25 routing > ! > ! > ! > interface Serial2/0 > description connected to HLR > no ip address > encapsulation x25 dce > x25 address > x25 htc 32 > x25 win 7 > x25 wout 7 > x25 idle 5 > x25 nvc 8 > clockrate 64000 > ! > interface Serial2/1 > description connected to CMISE1 > no ip address > encapsulation x25 dce > x25 address 4401 > x25 htc 32 > x25 win 7 > x25 wout 7 > x25 idle 5 > x25 nvc 8 > clockrate 64000 > ! > interface Serial2/2 > description connected to OMP10 > no ip address > encapsulation x25 dce > x25 address > x25 htc 32 > x25 win 7 > x25 wout 7 > x25 idle 5 > x25 nvc 8 > clockrate 64000 > ! > interface Serial2/3 > description connected to MSC1 > no ip address > encapsulation x25 dce > x25 address > x25 htc 32 > x25 win 7 > x25 wout 7 > x25 idle 5 > x25 nvc 8 > clockrate 64000 > ! > interface Serial2/4 > description connected to MSC2 > no ip address > encapsulation x25 dce > x25 address 3322 > x25 htc 32 > x25 win 7 > x25 wout 7 > x25 idle 5 > x25 nvc 8 > clockrate 64000 > ! > interface Serial2/5 > description connected to CMISE2 > no ip address > encapsulation x25 dce > x25 address 1122 > x25 htc 32 > x25 win 7 > x25 wout 7 > x25 idle 5 > x25 nvc 8 > clockrate 64000 > ! > Serial2/6 > no ip address > encapsulation x25 dce > x25 htc 32 > x25 win 7 > x25 wout 7 > x25 idle 5 > x25 nvc 8 > clockrate 64000 > ! > interface Serial2/7 > no ip address > encapsulation x25 dce > x25 htc 32 > x25 win 7 > x25 wout 7 > x25 idle 5 > x25 nvc 8 > clockrate 64000 > > x25 route source interface Serial2/2 > x25 route source interface Serial2/2 > x25 route 3322 source interface Serial2/2 > ! > line con 0 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password cisco > login > ! > > end > > Thanks and Regards, > *** > Important > Confidentiality: This communication is intended for the above named person > and is confidential and/or legally privileged any opinion expressed in this > communication are not necessarily those of the Egyptian company for Mobile > Services (MobiNiL). If it has come to you in error you must take no action > based on it, nor must you copy or show it to anyone: please delete/destroy > and inform the sender immediately. > No Responsibility: MobiNiL is not responsible for any political, religious, > racial or partisan opinion in any correspondence conducted by its domain > users. Therefore, any such opinion expressed, whether explicitly or > implicitly, in any said correspondence is
Re: IP IRDP Feature? [7:56063]
Thanks Darren. Do I need it if I enable the IOS freature DHCP Server on the subnet. thanks >From: Darren Ward >To: Robert Massiache >CC: >Subject: Re: IP IRDP Feature? [7:56063] >Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:46:12 +1000 (EST) > >A number of operating systems support this including Microsoft and Sun for >finding a router. > >Darren Ward >(PGradCS, CCIE #8245, SCSA, CCDP, MCP) > > >On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Robert Massiache wrote: > > > Hi, > > I do not understand where exactly and in what context do we enable this > > service on the interfaces. Could someone explain me... > > > > I would appreciate you help. > > > > thanks > > > > _ > > Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN! > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp _ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56072&t=56063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is CCIE written exam passing score changed? [7:56054]
yeAH IT LOOKS LIKE IT HAS BEEN CHANGED. Ji-Gon Kim wrote:Hi Is the CCIE written exam passing score changed? Recently I found that a few korean people passed new written exam. And they said passing score is 58%. They took the exam middle of Oct. Could you anybody confirm it? Jigon,Kim Shahid Muhammad Shafi "Every man dies; not every man really lives" remember, if God bringz u 2 it, He WILL bring u thru it!!!- Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/ A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than ourselves - Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56070&t=56054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP IRDP Feature? [7:56063]
Robert, The first thing I would suggest reading is rfc 1256, which outlines the various extensions used by ICMP, which in turn is used by ICMP-RDP. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1256.txt?number=1256 Cisco makes notable use of IDRP in their MobileIP implementation. That would be a good place begin looking from an operational perspective. HTH Nigel - Original Message - From: "Robert Massiache" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:55 AM Subject: IP IRDP Feature? [7:56063] > Hi, > I do not understand where exactly and in what context do we enable this > service on the interfaces. Could someone explain me... > > I would appreciate you help. > > thanks > > _ > Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56069&t=56063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP IRDP Feature? [7:56063]
A number of operating systems support this including Microsoft and Sun for finding a router. Darren Ward (PGradCS, CCIE #8245, SCSA, CCDP, MCP) On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Robert Massiache wrote: > Hi, > I do not understand where exactly and in what context do we enable this > service on the interfaces. Could someone explain me... > > I would appreciate you help. > > thanks > > _ > Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56068&t=56063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STP and Switching ! [7:56061]
Jimmy, I do not have the title you note in your post but a few things to consider when identifying and trying to configure the root device within your network. A MDF or Distribution switch as you mentioned depending on the network design will more than likely provide both L2 connectivity to the IDF and L3 connectivity to the network core. Try and think of the operation within the MDF switch as totally separate processes in which the switch speaks only L2 to the IDF, but then L3 to the network core. In this regard the MDF switch will be a part of STP calculations when designating a root device within the network. The fact that you see designated ports on the MDF switch is because it is the root, which suggest that it wining the STP election. A couple things to look at would be the election process of root bridges which goes as follows; 1. Lowest Root BID 2. Lowest path cost to Root Bridge 3. Lowest Sender BID 4. Lowest Port ID Can you confirm that The mdf switch(switch D) isn't winning the election through some other means(i.e a lower priority, use the "set spanning-tree root" command). Also, this would depend on the switches and at what point they were both powered onto the network. What exactly do you mean by smaller MAC address? Do you care to post the MAC address of the mdf switch and switch C. HTH Nigel - Original Message - From: "Jimmy" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:37 AM Subject: STP and Switching ! [7:56061] > Hi, > I am confused by the CCNP exam certification guide (Cisco Press). It > mentioned that a switch in the Distribution layer would make a better Root > Bridge choice than one in Access layer. I thought for distribution switch is > of layer 3 so STP is not necessary for it unless it is a flat switched > network. (Pg 178 of the book) In the Figure 5.8 (Pg 176), i couldn't > understand how come Catalyst D is the DP for Catalyst E and F. I told > Catalyst C has priority than D since the MAC address is smaller. Is there > any mistake. Can anyone please advise. > > Where can i find the errata for the ciscopress book? I have went to > ciscopress.com but couldn't find any. Can anyone give me the URL? > > Cheers! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56067&t=56061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF and static routes [7:56030]
Thanks, Priscilla,, I added the redistribute static command and that did fix the problem. I am still a little confused as to how it works as it says that this command will only work with classful routing, yet I am using a subnet 172.19.99.0 255.255.255.0 but it did get added into the OSPF process!? thanks again, -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 17:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OSPF and static routes [7:56030] Did you add the redistribute static command to the OSPF process on Router2? That should help. There could be other trickier issues with classful versus classless, etc., but hopefully the fix is just to add the redistribute static command. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Adam Broad wrote: > > Dear All, > > I have an OSPF query which has been causing me a headache, > I have two 2610 routers on the LAN > > Router1 is joined to a large Frame relay network running OSPF. > > Router2 is participating in the OSPF network but also has two > ISDN links > to remote sites. > I have put in static routes to these networks onto router2. I > have > enabled ospf on the ethernet0 interface > and this is working no problem and I can ping from this router > across > (through router1) the Frame Relay network to anywhere. However > Router1 > is not receiving information about my remote sites so cannot > ping them. > The ISDN links are unnumbered and are using dialers. > > Do I need to number the links? > Should the OSPF not take all my routing table (Including any > static > routes) from router2 and send the info onto Router1? > Do I have to enable any OSPF commands on the Dialer interfaces? > > Any help much appreciated, > > A Broad > > > FRAME > RELAY-ROUTER1-LANROUTER2--ISDN > to 2 remote sites > > AREA10--AREA10--AREA10 > > -10.0.0.1-- > 10.0.0.2-Unnumbered Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56066&t=56030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
