On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:54 AM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/24/23 13:52, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Oh. Well. That's just what the Arbitor said:
> > "I hereby initiate an Agoran Decision (a Moot) to determine public
> > confidence
On 5/24/23 13:52, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
Oh. Well. That's just what the Arbitor said:
"I hereby initiate an Agoran Decision (a Moot) to determine public
confidence in CFJ 4030's current judgement of TRUE, "
I am publicly confident in Yachay's judgement of TRUE.
So if you're
nix: "How is it on the way out if it's being reinforced by a decision? "
Janet: "I strongly disagree with "we are voting on the final outcome". The
reasoning is what matters for building consensus, and the reasoning is
what matters for future cases."
Oh. Well. That's just what the Arbitor said:
On 5/24/23 14:28, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> I vote AFFIRM on this decision. The reasoning may be "wrong", but we are
> voting on the final outcome which is perfectly acceptable. That and just
> because a reasoning is hasty or simple doesn't determine that the reasoning
> is wrong.
On 5/24/23 13:28, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
I vote AFFIRM on this decision. The reasoning may be "wrong", but we are
voting on the final outcome which is perfectly acceptable. That and just
because a reasoning is hasty or simple doesn't determine that the reasoning
is wrong.
On 5/24/23 14:02, juan via agora-official wrote:
> Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2023-05-24 06:46]:
>>> + blob 2023-05-18 " cearguizoni1 at gmail dot com
>> Oops we never resolved this.
>>
>> Claim of Error: Blob (as listed 4 times on the Registrar's Monthly
>>
On 5/24/23 13:02, juan via agora-official wrote:
we all know (and all shall know when looking upon
the archives) to which blob this refers.
I'm a little suspicious about this claim. Reading 5+ year old archives
can require a lot of reading to understand anything that would've been
obvious in
Anneke-Constantine via agora-business [2023-05-23 22:59]:
> My name is Anneke-Constantine, and I would like to join the game of Agora.
Welcome Anneke-Constantine! You are registered.
--
juan
Registrar
On 5/23/23 03:09, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> A player CAN, by paying a fee of 5 brights, turn a specified rule Radiant,
> provided its power is less than 2. Each referenda on a proposal that would
> amend or repeal a Radiant rule has its Adoption Index increased to 2, if it
> is ever
Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-05-22 15:41]:
> I change my Agoran email to janet.agora@unspecified.systems
--
juan
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:14 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> Actually, I was asked by ais523 to add to a CfJ a clarification on
> something, a 'sub-Judgement' of a sort.
>
> Would've it been possible for me to, for example, Judge TRUE, but also add
> a sub-Judgement that from
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:23 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Events Worth Note
> =
> Red merged both Dynamite (when 4st placed E3).
>
> 4st gained 1 accolade for Dynamite.
>
> Red merged Amber (when ais523 placed F3).
>
> Nobody gained
On 5/22/23 15:14, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Would've it been possible for me to, for example, Judge TRUE, but also add
> a sub-Judgement that from here on, we should play according to the
> interpretation that would make it FALSE (that is, that you can only anoint
> once)?
Actually, I was asked by ais523 to add to a CfJ a clarification on
something, a 'sub-Judgement' of a sort.
Would've it been possible for me to, for example, Judge TRUE, but also add
a sub-Judgement that from here on, we should play according to the
interpretation that would make it FALSE (that
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:44 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Yes, but wouldn't certain CfJs be likely to enter into Moot Tennis if we
> don't take the opinion of the majority as a tiebreaker as Judges? We can
> keep going back and forth with Moots, because 2+N Support seems
On 5/22/23 15:44, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Yes, but wouldn't certain CfJs be likely to enter into Moot Tennis if we
> don't take the opinion of the majority as a tiebreaker as Judges? We can
> keep going back and forth with Moots, because 2+N Support seems fairly easy
> to
Yes, but wouldn't certain CfJs be likely to enter into Moot Tennis if we
don't take the opinion of the majority as a tiebreaker as Judges? We can
keep going back and forth with Moots, because 2+N Support seems fairly easy
to pull off.
How is the Moot Tennis supposed to end?
On Mon, May 22, 2023
On 5/22/23 15:25, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> CfJ 3890 puts it into nicer words ("Where there is no obvious way to solve
> a given problem, judges are free to apply their own life experience
> (...)"), but seems to line up with what I had to end up with, simply
> applying my own
CfJ 3890 puts it into nicer words ("Where there is no obvious way to solve
a given problem, judges are free to apply their own life experience
(...)"), but seems to line up with what I had to end up with, simply
applying my own personal opinion.
But also, yes, I agree that it's not explicit; but
On 5/21/23 00:58, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I place a tile at D5, merging Emerald into Red.
Fails as you do not have a 5.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
On 5/15/23 23:00, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I believe I should have more tokens and investment than this?
>
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2023-May/051351.html
True, but you failed to grant from your middle constructor (it's set to
4, you
nix via agora-discussion [2023-05-22 13:46]:
> On 5/22/23 13:45, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > I petition the Surveyor to publish eir weekly report.
>
> I respond: I'm not even kind of late, this is my normal day to publish
> my reports and I've only missed one before.
>
> --
> nix
> Prime
On 5/22/23 13:45, juan via agora-business wrote:
> I petition the Surveyor to publish eir weekly report.
I respond: I'm not even kind of late, this is my normal day to publish
my reports and I've only missed one before.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
On 5/22/23 14:33, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-05-21 01:28]:
>> Changes:
>> - Generally cleaned up wording
>> - Handle rice at Lost and Found
>> - Harvesting a plan now grants rice before revoking (handling the case
>> where a person is in both the up and
Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-05-21 01:28]:
> Changes:
> - Generally cleaned up wording
> - Handle rice at Lost and Found
> - Harvesting a plan now grants rice before revoking (handling the case
> where a person is in both the up and down sets)
> - Use "CAN" for enabling
> - Use a by
I think the main time-consuming activity in the Rice Game would be
navigating its particularly challenging endgame (how do you get that last
Rice? diplomacy? scam?), rather than grinding for large amounts of Rice.
Even if we do end up going with this, and you end up getting 4 Rice, that
last fifth
On 5/21/23 15:12, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 12:35 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> This is my Judgement for CFJ 4030, which asks:
>>
>> Per Rule 2680, a player can anoint a ritual number multiple
> Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals, Power=3) states that adopted proposals
> "take effect", and:
>
>Except insofar as the actions performed by a proposal happen one
>after another, rather than simultaneously, a proposal's effect is
>instantaneous. A proposal can neither delay
Seriously considering to send to business that i jaywalk without a license
with dangerous levels of swagger anyways
søn. 21. mai 2023, 2:19 p.m. skrev Edward Murphy via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>:
> G. wrote:
>
> > The below CFJ is 4029. I assign it to Murphy.
> >
> >
ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
nix wrote:
On 5/19/23 11:50, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
I'd much rather take the route of trying to get the Radiance/Stamps
system functional again, than of trying to repeal it. (Stamps in
particular are one of the most powerful "new player perks" we've seen,
and I suspect that that's
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 12:35 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This is my Judgement for CFJ 4030, which asks:
>
> Per Rule 2680, a player can anoint a ritual number multiple times
> for a single instance of a ritual act.
>
> This is
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 10:35 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business
wrote:
> I Judge TRUE, forced to play my last card and merely appeal to my personal
> opinion.
I think this is just fine, and a nice overall first judgement and
discussion of the issues. When we were discussing this on
On Sun, 2023-05-21 at 10:50 -0700, Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> I change my vote on 8983 to ABSENT, or PRESENT if I cannot change my
> vote to something invalid.
The wording you want is "I withdraw my vote on 8983" or "I retract my
vote on 8983" (these are synonyms).
To "change a
This has been the best possible outcome
lør. 20. mai 2023, 11:07 p.m. skrev Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>:
> On 5/21/23 01:59, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I counter by instead submitting the following proposal:
> >
> > {Adoption index = 3
>
On 5/21/23 01:59, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> I counter by instead submitting the following proposal:
>
> {Adoption index = 3
>
> [Stop making small changes to fix things. This security issue happens all
> the time.]
Exactly what non-small change would you want here? Your
I counter by instead submitting the following proposal:
{Adoption index = 3
[Stop making small changes to fix things. This security issue happens all
the time.]
Enact the following rule:"By default and unless otherwise specified,
assets, switches, and eir properties are secured at the power
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:07 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> - I like the Focuses idea.
> - I think you'd really just want to use your Stamps to win rather than
> anything else. Maybe instead you can only Focus on something if you have
> the right Stamp or combination of
I do agree with that Officers should be rewarded somehow, but my main issue
here is how the democracy is run, not Officer rewards.
Maybe we could keep those rewards somehow without any nerfs while limiting
or nerfing other things?
I've attempted a "Officer salary" proto, anyways.
I'm also sorry
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:49 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:46 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On 5/19/23 16:40, Forest Sweeney wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:46 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/23 16:40, Forest Sweeney wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 5/19/23 16:16, Forest Sweeney via agora-business
On 5/19/23 16:40, Forest Sweeney wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 5/19/23 16:16, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > I consent to all rice plans that have my player in the Rice Up
> list and do
> > not have my player
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I'd argue that I fit criteria 4 of Rule 2519 ("Consent"):
> "4. it is reasonably clear from context that e wanted the action to
> take place or assented to it taking place."
There's quite a few precedents in
*Blows smoke off gun, spins pistol back into holster*
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:42 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I think
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I think it could, because I believe they are providing context which
> reasonably indicates that they want their consent to be applied in that
> way. The 4st point in Rule 2519 seems
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/23 16:16, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > I consent to all rice plans that have my player in the Rice Up list and
> do
> > not have my player in the Rice Down list. I
I think it could, because I believe they are providing context which
reasonably indicates that they want their consent to be applied in that
way. The 4st point in Rule 2519 seems to allow it.
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:47 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> So, only someone who already is in power and a beneficiary of the system
> should be entitled to propose change things?
Er, I never said you couldn't propose. I was giving you feedback on
how I felt about voting for
On 5/19/23 16:16, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> I consent to all rice plans that have my player in the Rice Up list and do
> not have my player in the Rice Down list. I also consent to all rice plans
> that have no players in the Rice Up list and I am not in the Rice Down list.
>
>
I made a better consent notification anyhow, but thanks for looking out for
me! (I noticed my failure to use the right fora as well... such a 4st thing
to do!)
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:18 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/23 16:11, Forest
On 5/19/23 14:21, Beokirby via agora-discussion wrote:
On 2023-05-18 10:56 PM, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
On 2023-05-18 10:41 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
ID Author(s) AI Title
---
On 5/19/23 15:21, Beokirby via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2023-05-18 10:56 PM, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
>> On 2023-05-18 10:41 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
>>> ID Author(s) AI Title
>>>
On 5/19/23 16:11, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:57 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 5/19/23 14:56, juan via agora-business wrote:
>>> I create and consent to the following Rice Plan:
>>>
>>> Rice Up: []
>>>
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:57 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/23 14:56, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > I create and consent to the following Rice Plan:
> >
> > Rice Up: []
> > Rice Down: []
> >
>
> I consent to the above rice plan.
>
> --
>
- I like the Focuses idea.
- I think you'd really just want to use your Stamps to win rather than
anything else. Maybe instead you can only Focus on something if you have
the right Stamp or combination of Stamps in your possession? For example,
something like: Voting Focus [Requirement: Ownership
On 2023-05-18 10:56 PM, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
On 2023-05-18 10:41 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
ID Author(s) AI Title
---
8980~ Yachay 1.0 Riding with
You could say that to anyone disadvantaged who wants to change how things
are, it's not particularly insightful (or accurate, in this case).
So, only someone who already is in power and a beneficiary of the system
should be entitled to propose change things?
I don't think my situation is as bad,
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:41 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 5/19/23 12:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote
> >> 8978* Janet 3.0 Authorized initiation
> > FOR, although it doesn't actually solve the issue that brought this
> > up, as it doesn't ratify
On 2023-05-19 1:38 PM, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
There's danger in a contract like this. If you have 0 Rice, and say, I have
1 Rice, and I submit a Rice Plan that gives us both 1 Rice and it ends up
being the Rice Plan that passes, then you lose that round and I win that
On 5/19/23 12:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote
>> 8978* Janet 3.0 Authorized initiation
> FOR, although it doesn't actually solve the issue that brought this
> up, as it doesn't ratify a *proposal's* existence when the decision is
> to adopt a proposal (the equivalent
There's danger in a contract like this. If you have 0 Rice, and say, I have
1 Rice, and I submit a Rice Plan that gives us both 1 Rice and it ends up
being the Rice Plan that passes, then you lose that round and I win that
round, and we're both set back to 0 Rice.
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 7:21 PM
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > I sometimes feel like half my arguing at Agora is dedicated to trying
> > to persuade people not to repeal the economy.
> >
> > It rarely works,
On 5/19/23 11:50, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
I'd much rather take the route of trying to get the Radiance/Stamps
system functional again, than of trying to repeal it. (Stamps in
particular are one of the most powerful "new player perks" we've seen,
and I suspect that that's a good
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> > discussion wrote:
> > > With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> > discussion wrote:
> > > With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I
Technically you need to "consent" to having your "Signature" on a "Rice
Plan", but given how lenient consent rules are (Rule 2519, point 4
especially), I believe this and the others like it are fine. It just needs
to be "reasonably clear from context".
I think it's a great advantage that the
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> discussion wrote:
> > With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I believe that your
> > Officer salary problem is part of a larger problem of Agora
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> I don't intend to design an economy, because I don't think I'm competent
> enough to do so. I'll try to contribute where I can, though.
>
Ah, the typical take-away power with a promise, but an unfulfilled
one. No
On 2023-05-19 1:33 AM, Katie Davenport via agora-business wrote:
I create and consent to the following rice plan.
[
Rice Up: [inalienableWright, beokirby, blob]
Rice Down: [ ]
]
-inalienableWright (Katie)
I consent to this list
I don't intend to design an economy, because I don't think I'm competent
enough to do so. I'll try to contribute where I can, though.
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 6:40 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via
Most newer players aren't going to know how to navigate the game and
competently use mechanics like Stones or Dreams (I still don't know how
Stones are meant to work). And even then, there's an opportunity cost in it
all. A player that already is well-off can afford to use their Dream for
things
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I believe that your
> Officer salary problem is part of a larger problem of Agora overall needing
> a proper economy again, not a voting strength problem.
So offer
On 5/19/23 11:26, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
But, no. I don't think that any player deserves ~4 times the voting
strength of a newbie, regardless of the reason. I want other players to be
able to play nomic, especially newbies, and they need a relevant amount of
voting strength
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:28 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:51 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > > Let's give everyone a more equal chance to be relevant.
> > >
>
> So right now, Officers' only
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:51 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> > Let's give everyone a more equal chance to be relevant.
> >
So right now, Officers' only reward is increased voting strength (I
believe), and the game is growing with lots of new players so
officers' work is getting
On 5/19/23 03:45, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
8981~ Janet, nix 2.0 Stone fixes
PRESENT for now, I haven't studied those rules yet
Well, the gist of the intended change is that some of the stones say
their own name in their effects, when it'd be better to say
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 2:08 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following two Proposals:
>
> Title: Democratization (low AI version)
> AI: 1
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
> /*Comment: I'm fine with rewarding officers and such with
On 5/19/23 00:57, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:55 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I create and consent to each of the following rice plans:
>>
>> 1. As follows:
>>
>> * Rice Up: The empty set.
>>
>> * Rice
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:55 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I create and consent to each of the following rice plans:
>
> 1. As follows:
>
> * Rice Up: The empty set.
>
> * Rice Down: The empty set.
>
> 2. As follows:
>
> * Rice Up: The set of active
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 9:56 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 21:41, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
> > ID Author(s) AITitle
> >
> ---
> > 8980~
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest Sweeney
wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 5:08 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:57 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>> > On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> > >
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 5:08 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:57 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > > --
> > > H. ais523, Champion×17, M.N., D.N.Phil, Marvy Scamster
>
On 5/18/23 16:29, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> Welcome to another episode of me being paranoid about the same enactment
> timing scam again.
>
> I announce my intent to deputise as Assessor to resolve the Agoran
> decisions to adopt Proposals 8965, 8966, 8967, 8968, 8969 and 8970.
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:57 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > --
> > H. ais523, Champion×17, M.N., D.N.Phil, Marvy Scamster
>
> Appreciate the little humble brag in the signature :p
A portion of that was the result of scams, and scams
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:49 -0500, blob via agora-discussion wrote:
> I, being the new player, totally agree with this. I would be more than
> willing to put some sort of marker in front of my name, as others in the
> past have done. How should I go about changing my name--or how have others
> in
On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> --
> H. ais523, Champion×17, M.N., D.N.Phil, Marvy Scamster
Appreciate the little humble brag in the signature :p
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:36 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:44 AM juan via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> Note that the "free choice" is qualified by the need to "pick em out
> in the full range of Agoran contexts". The
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 2:29 PM ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Or perhaps this is just a case of "the ais523 who has been following
> Agora for over 15 years spots things that the ais523 who had been there
> for only one year didn't".
Lol, I meant to add myself that the rules underlying may
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > That said, I suspect the word in R2029 is currently undefined: I don't
> > think "a definition that was in place at the time the rule was adopted"
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2023-05-18 13:16]:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:51 PM nix via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > > CFJ: This violates Rule 2029 ("Town Fountain").
> > > I note and investigate the infraction to be 2 blots.
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> that it may fail is enough disclaimer to avoid no faking. I'll also
> note that
On 5/18/23 16:08, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
>> violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
> Sufficient carefulness would be not
On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
Sufficient carefulness would be not investigating until the CFJ was
resolved, or your timer was
I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:52 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
>
On 5/18/23 14:51, nix via agora-business wrote:
On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
CFJ: This violates Rule 2029 ("Town Fountain").
I note and investigate the infraction to be 2 blots. (and as we know,
this
investigation only occurs if it does indeed violate the rule).
On 5/18/23 14:16, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I think this will fail but, I think it could be interesting regardless to
have an unofficial (or official) record of the methods for how each win was
achieved.
That's not what I would use titles for. That would be better suited for
I think this will fail but, I think it could be interesting regardless to
have an unofficial (or official) record of the methods for how each win was
achieved.
On Thursday, May 18, 2023, nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:06, Forest Sweeney via
Just to advertise myself a bit here, these kind of situations is what my
Invocation Proposal is trying to alleviate.
On Thursday, May 18, 2023, nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:06, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
>
>> I intent to clean Rule
501 - 600 of 30836 matches
Mail list logo
