[r...@mi aolserver-4.5.1]# rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-devel-2.9-2.i386
glibc-common-2.9-2.i386
glibc-headers-2.9-2.i386
glibc-2.9-2.i686
[r...@mi aolserver-4.5.1]#
Reg
Nitin
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> Sorry, it appears that pthreads should be part of glibc and gl
Sorry, it appears that pthreads should be part of glibc and glibc-devel.
Check for those.
On 10/16/09 12:59 PM, nitin chandra wrote:
> yum install did not work
>
>
> [r...@mi aolserver-4.5.1]# yum install pthreads
> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> fedora
>
yum install did not work
[r...@mi aolserver-4.5.1]# yum install pthreads
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
fedora
| 2.8 kB 00:00
updates
| 3.4 kB 00:00
updates/primary_db
| 4.6 MB 01:26
doing
# yum install pthreads
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:08 PM, nitin chandra wrote:
> Yup you are right
>
> No pthreads
>
> [r...@mi aolserver-4.5.1]# rpm -qa | grep pthreads
> [r...@mi aolserver-4.5.1]#
>
> Reg
>
> Nitin
>
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this
Yup you are right
No pthreads
[r...@mi aolserver-4.5.1]# rpm -qa | grep pthreads
[r...@mi aolserver-4.5.1]#
Reg
Nitin
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave
On 10/16/09 12:15 PM, nitin chandra wrote:
> How do i find if 'libpthreads' is installed?
You said you're on Fedora FC10, right? I'm guessing something like this:
$ rpm -qa | grep pthreads
might work.
--
Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer N
Tcl was a default install ... as and when installed the OS. So i am
not sure if it was installed with '--enable-threads'.
I cant recollect editing TCL_THREADS=1
How do i find if 'libpthreads' is installed?
Nitin
>>>
>>> I have a fresh installation of FC10, with gcc 4.3.2, kerrnel 2.6.27,
>>> o
On 10/16/09 12:21 AM, nitin chandra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM, nitin chandra
> wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I have a fresh installation of FC10, with gcc 4.3.2, kerrnel 2.6.27,
>> on a P4 1.8GHz, 256 DDR RAM, with Python 2.6.2 (--enable-shared,
>> --with-threads, /opt/python262)
On 16/10/2009, at 3:21 PM, nitin chandra wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM, nitin chandra > wrote:
following steps were taken for installation:
# tar zxvf aolserver-4.5.1-src.tar.gz
# cd aolserver-4.5.1
# ./configure --prefix=/opt/aolserver --with-tcl=/usr/lib\ --enable-
threads | tee a
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM, nitin chandra wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have a fresh installation of FC10, with gcc 4.3.2, kerrnel 2.6.27,
> on a P4 1.8GHz, 256 DDR RAM, with Python 2.6.2 (--enable-shared,
> --with-threads, /opt/python262), Tcl / Tk 8.5 installed as part of the
> distro (/us
I thought I sent this last week, but I used the wrong account, anyway:
This example is not "multi-threaded", but it handles multiple
connections. The basic API are ns_socklisten, ns_sockaccept and
ns_sockcheck. (http://rmadilo.com/files/nsapi/)
The example also uses ns_socklistencallback, but the
The code should work ok. I remember it was a bit messy to map these
Aolserver tcl commands which pre-dated the Tcl channel stuff so it was
compatible years ago and there were examples of memory leaks from long
running detached tcl threads but with care it should be ok
Jim
Sent from my iPh
Hello,
AolServer gives a possibility to use ns_socklistencallback to open a
socket, 'ns_thread begindetached' to create thread, ns_chan - to path
channel to this thread. If we do this with every new connection, we get
multithreaded tcp socket server - which is exactly what I wanted. I've
test
As far as I am aware, the only way to do it is to implement a new socket driver
in C.
AOLserver can certainly handle this. There used to be nsftp, which did just
that.
Bas.
On Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:26pm, "Nikolay Shulga"
said:
>
Hello,
>
>
Is it possible to use Aolserver as mul
Just a heads up -
One possible side-effect could be that if you have a proxy in place in
front of your aolserver, you might lose the ability to track unique
ip's, and just catch the proxy's ip. Most modern proxy's set the x-
forwarded-for to enable you to delineate end-user ips.
-j
On Aug
Hello!
You can use HAProxy or other reverse-proxy for more performance and logging.
Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov.
http://pechnikov.tel/
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email mess
There is no built-in setting to log or not log forwarded headers. It's
not difficult to change, but it requires a little programming.
If you are comfortable with C, you can edit nslog/nslog.c and change the
behaviour with X-Forwarded-For (it's at nslog.c:272 in my copy). You
could disable th
William Scott Jordan schrieb:
Hey all!
I've had a few times recently where AOLserver has crashed under high
loads. Each time, I see a line in the logs that looks something like
"unable to alloc 4895393 bytes".
What was the size of AOLserver before the crash (most likely around 2GB)?
What is
On 7/1/09 12:54 PM, William Scott Jordan wrote:
I've had a few times recently where AOLserver has crashed under high
loads. Each time, I see a line in the logs that looks something like
"unable to alloc 4895393 bytes".
Any guesses on what's causing this?
Got Tcl code that invokes [exec] anyw
Hi Mike,
The same stuff (I think) that was on dev.aolserver.com is on
http://panoptic.com/wiki/aolserver/AOLserver_Wiki
I am not sure which was most up-to-date.
Dossy, do you look after the dev.aolserver.com site? I think it can
not connect to the database any more.
Nick
2009/6/3 Gahan, Mike
I have copies of some docs here:
http://rmadilo.com/files/as23docs/index.html
http://rmadilo.com/files/docs/toc.html
http://rmadilo.com/files/nsapi/
And various other info under:
http://rmadilo.com/files/
and Tcl, AOLserver and related docs:
http://junom.com/document/
You can search the alm
Hello!
On Saturday 02 May 2009 19:20:15 Joseph Kondel wrote:
> Glad you were able to get haproxy working. I have a similar setup
> where I use stunnel in front of haproxy to handle all the ssl. If you
> need I can paste in some sample config directives.
How to you tune HAProxy+Stunnel? I have wor
Glad you were able to get haproxy working. I have a similar setup
where I use stunnel in front of haproxy to handle all the ssl. If you
need I can paste in some sample config directives.
Also be aware that if you care about logs you should patch stunnel to
supper the x-forwarded-for header.
Hello!
On Thursday 30 April 2009 03:29:41 Joseph Kondel wrote:
> I've not used pound but do use HAProxy and have found it quite
> capable. Some say it's a bit more difficult to setup for the average
> user ( mostly because it has A LOT of features / options ) but I doubt
> it would give anyo
Hello!
On Thursday 30 April 2009 03:29:41 Joseph Kondel wrote:
> Give it a look if you are unable to solve the pound issue.
>
> HAProxy site : http://haproxy.1wt.eu/
I did try to use HAProxy but I did find that it's work with cookies incorrect.
HAProxy delete or rewrite server cookies which wher
We use nginx+SSL and used before pound+SSL.
We have no SSL for the aolserver configured.
-gustaf neumann
Alexey Pechnikov schrieb:
Hello!
On Thursday 30 April 2009 10:40:17 Gustaf Neumann wrote:
nginx is more work to configure. at least the english documentation is
sometimes
tough to read,
Hello!
On Thursday 30 April 2009 10:40:17 Gustaf Neumann wrote:
> nginx is more work to configure. at least the english documentation is
> sometimes
> tough to read, but here you have an advantage. nginx is very stable and
> fully
> featured.
Do you using nginx+SSL or AOL+SSL? I'm using pound as
Dear Alexey,
my recommendation is to try nginx. We have up to 3000 concurrently open
tcp-connetions,
the systems is very reponsive. On the same system we ran into problems
at about 800
connections with pound; then we reduced the stack size, that helped
until 1500
connections, then we switched
I've not used pound but do use HAProxy and have found it quite
capable. Some say it's a bit more difficult to setup for the average
user ( mostly because it has A LOT of features / options ) but I doubt
it would give anyone on this list a problem.
I bring it up because when researching whic
Fenton, Brian schrieb:
Congratulations indeed.
On a related note, AOLserver.com doesn't appear to be responding.
Can someone bring it up please?
i can't help here, but i noticed that www.aolserver.com (or
http://aolserver.sourceforge.net/) works.
For documentation, please use
http://panopti
09 05:58
To: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver 4.5.1 released on February 2, 2009
Congratulations !
Thanks to all who worked on making it available.
Cheers !
Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the availability of AOLserver 4.5.1. This
> release
Congratulations !
Thanks to all who worked on making it available.
Cheers !
Dossy Shiobara wrote:
We are pleased to announce the availability of AOLserver 4.5.1. This
release is mostly a bug-fix and maintenance release, and offers enhanced
functionality and scalability and improved documentat
Rami Jadaa wrote:
> So any idea what could be there in nsmysql that would crash AOLserver?
Are you using the latest nsmysql (CVS HEAD)?
Can you get a core dump from the crash and a gdb backtrace?
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network
--Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
> Von: Juan José del Río <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
> Verschickt: Mi., 29. Okt. 2008, 12:26
> Thema: Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver Crash!
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> >From my experience, I think the problem may be
ation documentation, the current release is v45_r0 , I
think. .
good luck,
Bjoern
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Von: Juan José del Río <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Verschickt: Mi., 29. Okt. 2008, 12:26
Thema: Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver Crash!
Hello
Rami,
it looks to me as if the problem is due to a c-extension you are using
and happens after a thread exit. When a thread exists, it frees among
other things the associated tcl interpreter. At this time, all c
extensions have to unload cleanly as well. Note that ns_eval creates
and destroys as
Hi Juan,
That's a good point. I noticed Rami was hosting on 64 bit AMD systems
and it is possible that if he were running on a 32 bit architecture
the problems he's experiencing might not surface. This could mean a
problem with Tcl on 64 bit or something specific to AOLserver. I
suspect t
Hello,
>From my experience, I think the problem may be related with the 64 bits.
I've servers with AOLServer 32 bits, and AOLServer 64 bits, and I have
seen 64 bits growing faster in memory (and even not decreasing through
time), until it takes a considerable amount of memory (then I have to
rest
It appears that you have the same problem in all of your servers; the
goal is to find out what part of the code is failing and under what
conditions. Three things stand out: failed servers are under a heavier
load than those that don't exhibit the failure; the failure happens
shortly after
Hi Scott,
Thanks for your reply.
I don't think that I can send the log as it will be so big , as AOlserver
initiates and load a lot of ACS code...
And for the checksum, we did the following:
Using pound, we shifted the load going to this webserver to another server
on another machine where it use
Rami,
Tcl is attempting to create a new hash table entry on a hash table
that was either never created or was created but has ceased to exist
-- most likely the pointer to that hash table is null or corrupted.
This could be something in AOLserver that uses the Tcl_Hash* API.
First steps:
Hello!
В сообщении от Friday 26 September 2008 08:45:06 Dossy Shiobara написал(а):
> One of the more common questions folks ask about AOLserver is "how do I
> set up virtual hosting" - although, trying to explain that could take up
> too much of that 3 hour slot itself.
Virtual hosting is really
Matthew M. Burke wrote:
> I will be giving a short (3 hour) tutorial at the Tcl'2008 conference in
> Manassas, VA on Monday, 20 October. See
> http://www.tcl.tk/community/tcl2008/ for details on the tutorial.
Thank you for representing AOLserver at the Tcl conference! I do plan
to attend but I r
Hi!
If I'd be an tutorial attendant, I'd like to hear about:
- Basic/Advanced Setup
- Use of telnet (or similar) control of Aolserver
- Use of TCL API
If the tutorial will be video recorded, please let me (us) know.
Thanks
Cesáreo
Matthew M. Burke escribió:
All,
I will be giving a short (
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 17:35, Bas Scheffers wrote:
> On 17/04/2008, at 9:25 AM, Tom Jackson wrote:
> > Your script/page level code can remain unchanged even when you switch
> > databases.
>
> That looks more like an OR mapping framework. I think that is a good
> thing to have also but to me it
On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:37 PM, Bas Scheffers wrote:
It is the obvious way to do it. I would suspect that the OpenACS
team decided to mimic Oracle behavior simply to lower the amount of
re-writing of existing queries to be done. Which is perfectly valid
for their goal and how I would likely hav
Uhm, yes, possible. :)
On 17/04/2008, at 12:54 PM, Michael A. Cleverly wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Bas Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 17/04/2008, at 8:14 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
I don't really like bind variables, I would much rather see it
implemented
like:
ns_db s
Message
From: Bas Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 4:20:46 PM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver and Pgtcl
On 17/04/2008, at 8:14 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
I have wanted to add bind variable support to nsdb for a _long_ time,
but
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Bas Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/04/2008, at 8:14 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
>
> I don't really like bind variables, I would much rather see it implemented
> like:
>
> ns_db select $db "select * from people where country = $1 and age > $2"
> [list "
The other is performance.
Jade
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Bas Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would never say that; not having to worry about quoting is one of the
> main advantages of using bind variables/parameters.
>
> Bas.
>
>
>
> --
> AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
>
>
This is how pgtcl actually does bind variables...
- Original Message
From: Bas Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 4:20:46 PM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver and Pgtcl
On 17/04/2008, at 8:14 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
&g
On 17/04/2008, at 9:10 AM, Don Baccus wrote:
ns_db select $db "select * from people where country = $1 and age >
$2" [list "au" 25]
Geez, names are more readable than numbers in any sizable query.
The numbers/names isn't that important to me. What is important is
that I would like to see vari
On 17/04/2008, at 9:25 AM, Tom Jackson wrote:
Your script/page level code can remain unchanged even when you switch
databases.
That looks more like an OR mapping framework. I think that is a good
thing to have also but to me it is separate from having bind variables
in the core nsdb api. I wo
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 16:20, Bas Scheffers wrote:
> I don't really like bind variables, I would much rather see it
> implemented like:
> ns_db select $db "select * from people where country = $1 and age >
> $2" [list "au" 25]
You can look at the examples in my recent post. It works with pl
On Apr 16, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Bas Scheffers wrote:
On 17/04/2008, at 8:14 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
I have wanted to add bind variable support to nsdb for a _long_ time,
but never got around to computing this support matrix that I describe
above.
I don't really like bind variables, I would much r
On 17/04/2008, at 8:14 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
I have wanted to add bind variable support to nsdb for a _long_ time,
but never got around to computing this support matrix that I describe
above.
I don't really like bind variables, I would much rather see it
implemented like:
ns_db select $db
On Apr 16, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
I have wanted to add bind variable support to nsdb for a _long_ time,
but never got around to computing this support matrix that I describe
above.
If you do, it needs to be a config option, because with Oracle you do
*not* want to do this i
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 15:11, Don Baccus wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Tom Jackson wrote:
> > You should look at the pg driver, I think it can emulate bind
> > variables, or
> > maybe it is part of the db_* API of OpenACS.
>
> You have to compile nspostgres.c for OpenACS use to make the
On 2008.04.16, Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In general, bind variables is something which is handled by the
> driver, because there is no standard on how to do it. Some use ?, some
> use :varname.
Can someone please help by doing the necessary research and put together
a matrix of supp
On Apr 16, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Tom Jackson wrote:
You should look at the pg driver, I think it can emulate bind
variables, or
maybe it is part of the db_* API of OpenACS.
You have to compile nspostgres.c for OpenACS use to make the command
available.
Then use ns_pg_bind rather than ns_db.
You should look at the pg driver, I think it can emulate bind variables, or
maybe it is part of the db_* API of OpenACS.
I also have a wrapper API for ns_db which has more of a stored procedure type
API.
Here is a link to an example application:
http://junom.com/gitweb/gitweb.perl?p=twt.git;
Hi Brett,
Thanks for the message.
I just wanted to try it with pgtcl.
My problem with the underlying db api in aolserver is that there is no
mechanism for binding variables to an SQL statement, e.g:
set sql {
select
*
from
table
where
status = ?
}
There is no
I think the ns_odbc driver can survive from one connection to another. When I
use it, I have to put in a trace filter to close/return the handle.
I can't imagine that it is a good idea to just randomly reuse an open handle.
You risk running out of handles for one, but the state of the connectio
> Hi,
>
> I know aolserver comes with postgres support, but I would like to use
> the Pgtcl library for a project.
> Has anybody managed to use Pgtcl and keep a persistent connection to
> the database that can be re-used by the requests coming in, or do you
> have to keep opening a connection to t
Hello all.
I've included Titi's suggestion in the current version of the Win32-
OpenACS port. So now NSD is a well behaved windows service.
Thanks for your help,
Maurizio
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with
Hi,
I don't think you lose anything -- Tcl_Finalize carefully tears
everything down which is good when the code is used in an embedded
system but in AOLserver as a normal process on Unix or Windows the
resulting _exit doesn't care about all the work Tcl_Finalize may have
done.
-Jim
I checked out the exit code in nsmain.c and saw the following sequence:
/*
* Remove the pid maker file, print a final "server exiting"
* status message and return to main.
*/
NsRemovePidFile(procname);
StatusMsg(3);
Tcl_Finalize();
return 0;
The pidfile is getti
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 01:33:43PM +, Wolfgang Winkler wrote:
> I tried to compile AOLSERVER 4.5 with tcl 8.4.14 on an Intel Xeon Quad Core
> CPU (Debian 4.0r1).
>
> Everything compiles fine, but when I try to start nsd with bin/nsd it
> segfaults right away.
>
I would suggest backporting
On Feb 29, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Tom Jackson wrote:
I've done load testing with 64bit, watching the memory footprint as
I go,
never grew for me with 100k/test.
It could be that the 64bit uses more memory, and you just never
noticed that
your application grew in memory footprint over time and th
I've done load testing with 64bit, watching the memory footprint as I go,
never grew for me with 100k/test.
It could be that the 64bit uses more memory, and you just never noticed that
your application grew in memory footprint over time and then stablized. The
best way to test it is to do load
Did you compile Tcl? You appear to be using Tcl from a global location. You
should first compile/install Tcl with the same prefix as you intend for your
AOLserver installation directory.
tom jackson
On Thursday 28 February 2008 07:20, Wolfgang Winkler wrote:
> I did not enter any command line
I did not enter any command line arguments, because it crashed at once, even
without printing the argument help.
But I've copied a configured and compiled aolserver installation directory
from another machine (AMD dualcore 64 bit) and after a make clean && make &&
make install I don't get any s
On 2008.02.28, Wolfgang Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> > On 2008.02.28, Wolfgang Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I tried to compile AOLSERVER 4.5 with tcl 8.4.14 on an Intel Xeon Quad
> > > Core CPU (Debian 4.0r1). Everything com
On Thursday 28 February 2008, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> On 2008.02.28, Wolfgang Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried to compile AOLSERVER 4.5 with tcl 8.4.14 on an Intel Xeon Quad
> > Core CPU (Debian 4.0r1). Everything compiles fine, but when I try to
> > start nsd with bin/nsd it segfaul
On 2008.02.28, Wolfgang Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to compile AOLSERVER 4.5 with tcl 8.4.14 on an Intel Xeon Quad
> Core CPU (Debian 4.0r1). Everything compiles fine, but when I try to
> start nsd with bin/nsd it segfaults right away.
How are you starting nsd? Manually, from a
I agree.
janine
On Dec 13, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Juan José del Río [Simple Option] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I think dev.aolserver.com is a better place to find it, and people
will
feel it more like the official wiki, based on the url :)
If it works fine, then I think it's a good change.
Regard
Hello everyone,
I think dev.aolserver.com is a better place to find it, and people will
feel it more like the official wiki, based on the url :)
If it works fine, then I think it's a good change.
Regards,
Juan José
-
Juan José del Río| Comercio online / e-commerce
+34 616 512 340
Yeah, it was an interesting idea... ;)
http://www.freshpatents.com/Client-server-web-application-architectures-for-offline-usage-data-structures-and-related-methods-dt20070208ptan20070033569.php
- n
On 10/31/07, patrick o'leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's funny, when I used work for Eri
It's funny, when I used work for Eric, every time our operations /
sysadmin group complained about disk usage & cost of hardware,
we'd say we'd work on porting aolserver to the iPod, and slowly start
replacing boxes with cheap iPods
Emmm it was a joke Eric, just a joke. ;-)
But I've
I have a patch for conn.c and ns.h which enables the functionality of the
previous conn.c patch to be handled in a module, and/or written more clearly.
The patch is an extension of the external Ns_Conn* API, best seen in context
using the patch of ns.h:
Index: ns.h
=
On 10/3/07, Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, that worked. The -command was executed logging 'okay' + number of
> bytes written.
>
> But the ns_log statements following vwait are not executed. I assume that is
> expected? I posted the updated script at:
>
> http://rmadilo.com/files/
Stephen,
Thanks, that worked. The -command was executed logging 'okay' + number of
bytes written.
But the ns_log statements following vwait are not executed. I assume that is
expected? I posted the updated script at:
http://rmadilo.com/files/nsbgwrite/nsbgwrite.tcl
tom jackson
On Tuesday 02
On 10/3/07, Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, I don't really know if this will work as the original, I was able to
> fcopy in background a short text file, but larger than 4096 bytes just gets
> that amount according to wget.
>
> In foreground/blocking mode, fcopy returns larger fil
Stephen,
Thanks for pointing that out. I was wondering about that.
I have posted new module code which avoids the private symbols.
But this removes the contentsentlength option.
I still wonder what the difference between dup'ing and not dup'ing is for
(spliceout vs. non-spliceout). In the or
On 10/2/07, Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... it would be nice if new code followed AOLserver coding norms. Maybe
> you can get naviserver to take out their code. The module I wrote at least
> compiled against their server...
You're using symbols declared in nsd/nsd.h, which is privat
On 02.10.2007, at 19:51, Tom Jackson wrote:
web/navi $ ./bin/nsd -f -t sample-config.tcl
[02/Oct/2007:10:37:45][6858.690331232][-main-] Notice: nsmain: Tcl
version:
8.4.14
[02/Oct/2007:10:37:45][6858.690331232][-main-] Fatal: NsTclInitObjs:
sizeof(int) < sizeof(long)
Aborted
This has been c
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 02:50, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
> > I'm going to ask that the patch be removed and replaced with a module.
>
> i got the - wrong - impression that you (Tom) revised your proposal to
> change
> the patch into a module, when you realized, that the patch is NOT
> implementing b
Hi everybody,
Tom Jackson schrieb:
Gustaf,
I'm going to ask that the patch be removed and replaced with a module.
i got the - wrong - impression that you (Tom) revised your proposal to
change
the patch into a module, when you realized, that the patch is NOT
implementing background delivery,
On 01.10.2007, at 21:04, Tom Jackson wrote:
tclsock.c-766-/*
tclsock.c-767- * Pass a dup of the socket to the callback
thread, allowing
tclsock.c-768- * this thread's cleanup to close the current
socket. It's
tclsock.c-769- * not possible to simply register the channel
aga
On Monday 01 October 2007 10:48, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
> Tom, Gustaf has been both discussing and heavily using this one patch
> for several years. Just how much more discussion do you want? It
> obviously has been working well for U. Wien and others for years now,
> so why not just adopt their
Andrew Piskorski wrote:
What's the actual problem with Gustaf's code? You've obviously read
and thought about it, Tom (which I have not), but so far I see a lot
of theoretical hand wavy complaints from you, but little solid
criticism of the actual code.
I also think the code belongs on a modu
On 2007.10.01, Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And just where is Gustaf SUPPOSED to add docs for
> his new feature anyway?
I will try to update doc/ns_conn.n soon and include the two new ns_conn
subcommands that Gustaf's patch adds.
> And AOLserver should probably be changed somtime
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 09:40:19AM -0700, Tom Jackson wrote:
> Gustaf,
>
> I'm going to ask that the patch be removed and replaced with a module.
Why? What possible harm does including Gustaf's patch in the stock
server cause, rather than loading it as an additional module?
> Regardless of the
Gustaf,
I'm going to ask that the patch be removed and replaced with a module. I've
already written one which does the same thing.
We are in a bad habit in this community of letting anything happen at the
least possible cost to those who modify core code. This is a perfect example
of the situ
On 2007.09.28, Gustaf Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have asked dossy for commit permissions to add my patches to
> the aolserver on Sept 22, 2006 and sent him the patches as well,
> but my impression was that there was very little or no interest.
Sorry, I totally forgot to respond to yo
When comparing lighthttpd vs aolserver, notice that aolserver only
does worse than lighthttpd for large files, and on the same file
system/hardware. Thus, the difference in benchmarks is not likely to
be the access logs or disk.
Lighthttpd is *not* using the system call to send a file to a
Tom Jackson schrieb:
Okay, after looking further into this patch, I see that it doesn't actually
add any functionality to AOLserver. It looks like you would have to install a
newer version of OpenACS to use this.
as i wrote in my earlier mail, the patch is simple and small and adds
just two
Okay, after looking further into this patch, I see that it doesn't actually
add any functionality to AOLserver. It looks like you would have to install a
newer version of OpenACS to use this.
I have the stubs in for an AOLserver C module, but I'm not sure about a few
things.
Two commands are
When I look at the patch, it seems to me that this could be put into a module.
The new C level command doesn't need to be a static command, it uses only
external functions and variables (Ns_*, Tcl_*).
Can we work togeather to get a module instead of a patch?
I'll work up a module file today i
On 2007.09.28, John Buckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 404 handler approach is very clever, that'll do exactly what I
> need, thanks!
>
> Dossy: not sure if it's even worth benchmarking this, as this
> approach will yield the static-file-speeds, which are amazing, except
> in the rare
101 - 200 of 1254 matches
Mail list logo
