Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS - CUPC questions

hi All, Any update on this? On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:07 PM, sanity insanity < networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I need your analysis based on the following Requirement and my > configuration. Please advise > > > > Requirement : > --- > > > On

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS - CUPC questions

Hi All, I need your analysis based on the following Requirement and my configuration. Please advise Requirement : --- On the HQ switch I need to configure the following... 1) TO ensure cos value of "5" mapped to dscp ef 2) On interface g1/0/4 make sure all incomin

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS on HWIC-4ESW

get a bit more detailedHthSent from my Windows PhoneFrom: Alex Mendoza Sent: 8/26/2013 10:54 PMTo: CCIE Study Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS on HWIC-4ESWHi All,I'm wondering about QoS on remote site.I just applied auto-qos between HQ and remote site, everything looks fine.When I run this

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS on HWIC-4ESW

Study Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS on HWIC-4ESW Hi All, I'm wondering about QoS on remote site. I just applied auto-qos between HQ and remote site, everything looks fine. When I run this command on both routers, in remote site I can't see packets. HQ Class-map: AutoQoS-VoIP

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS on HWIC-4ESW

Hi All,I'm wondering about QoS on remote site.I just applied auto-qos between HQ and remote site, everything looks fine.When I run this command on both routers, in remote site I can't see packets.HQ    Class-map: AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust (match-any)      11139 packets, 704260 bytes      5 minute offe

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS (CCIEing)

CCIEing, >See page 111 of SRND >CAT2970(config)#mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 >! Maps CoS 5 to Queue 1 Threshold 3 (Voice gets all of Queue 1) >Remember Queue 1 is the priority Queue by default. >You should download the SRND and use it when configuring LAN QoS. It makes i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS

Hey, That command is assigning COS value 5 to Queue 1 Threshold 3. Depending on what DSCP value is mapped to COS 5 in the mld qos map cos-dscp mapping will determine what traffic is placed in that queue and threshold. I have seen COS 5 mapped to DSCP 40 by default using Auto QOS, which mea

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS

HI All, I am really struggling with QOS I can understand what this command means : mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 How to use it ??? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexp

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos

Hi all,scenario 1 : Q1 should get one third of bandwidth of link scenario 2: Guarantee traffic for priority queue "priority queue out" need only case 2, or both need it? thanksikizoo ___ For more information regardin

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

Just to address your question, you can change your second highlighted portion to mls qos srr-q out cos-m q 1 t 3 0 1 2 mls qos srr-q out cos-m q 2 t 3 3 4 7 and deal the cos 5 accordingly. If your requirement is to drop some cos packets when related queue reaches some threshold, then you will hav

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

Hi, If you've been told that cos 0, 1, and 2 should be in queue 1 and cos 3, 4, 7 need to be in queue 2 how would you go about this on the 3750? Below is my default configuration from doing the auto qos voip cisco-phone on my 3750. I highlighted the sections I think would need to be change but

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS - Need clarification

hi All, Any feedback on the below email? -Vir From: "virajith " Sent: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:31:01 To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Subject: LAN QOS - Need clarification Hi All, I need to map cos 5 to EF 46. The gig port for CUPC client n

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS - Need clarification

Hi All, I need to map cos 5 to EF 46. The gig port for CUPC client needs to be marked for dscp3 and guaranteed BW of 32k for CUPC signalling Excess traffic should be marked to dscp 8 and then transmitted. My configuration on the Headquater switch is as follows... mls qos mls qos map cos-dscp

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

Does someone have a complete solution on how to configure LAN QoS in regard to the CUpC client? Thanks Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions

:45 AM To: Krishna Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions Hi Krishna, sounds good so far. But as I said when COS 5 is the only COS in Queue 1, which Traffic/COS could fill T1 and T2 up to 100% when COS 5 is only mapped to T3? Regards

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions

> *From:* Steffen Bruening > *To:* Pixar Perfect > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Sent:* Saturday, October 20, 2012 6:38 PM > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions > > I have this seen this also, to be honest I think it shouldn't matter &g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions

. From: Steffen Bruening To: Pixar Perfect Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 6:38 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions I have this seen this also, to be honest I think it shouldn't matter whether it

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions

I have this seen this also, to be honest I think it shouldn't matter whether it is in threshold 1 or 3 as long as no other COS is in same Threshold of queue 1 of queset 2. When you leave in in threshold 3 I think you should be fine with: mls qos queue-set output *2* threshold 1 100* *100* 75 *100

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions

I noticed this and I believe it is a typo further evidenced by the note next to the command that says something to the effect that that command moves it to q1t1 Sent from my iPhone On Oct 20, 2012, at 2:17 AM, "Pixar Perfect" wrote: > The requirement is as follows on Lab 2 QOS section of the 5

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos questions

The requirement is as follows on Lab 2 QOS section of the 5-Lab Handbook. "For traffic being sent to the Site A gateway ensure that the traffic marked with COS 5 is dropped if the queue 1 is 75% full" The Solution guide (page 408) has the following solution. mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lan qos- cos 5 threshold 1 in queue 1 doesn't show in running config

Hi Krishna, you will not see Cos 5 in Threshold 1 because this is the default Threshold for Cos 5. The running-config presents always only the non-default values, e.g if you put an prefererence command on your dial-peers you will this only as long as it is not the default value 0. Regards Steff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS QUESTION

essage: 1 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:40:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Krishna mailto:vinayak_...@yahoo.com>> To: Online Study mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lan qos- cos 5 threshold 1 in queue 1 doesn't show in running config Message-ID: <13501

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS QUESTION

l What switch type are you using? Michael Sears Message: 1 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:40:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Krishna To: Online Study Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lan qos- cos 5 threshold 1 in queue 1     doesn't show in running config Message-ID:     <1350178810.93468.yahoomail...@web1646

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS QUESTION

urations. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/QoS-SRND-Book.html What switch type are you using? Michael Sears Message: 1 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:40:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Krishna To: Online Study Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lan qos- cos 5 threshold 1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lan qos- cos 5 threshold 1 in queue 1 doesn't show in running config

hi guys, i was wondering whether i am doing right way of doing lan qos or not ?? the requirements are assign cos 5 to priority queue , cos 3 4  to queue 2 with 60% exceed of cos 4 should be dropped. so here is my configuration for that mls qos  mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

of 25 >> percent then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if >> needs it. >> >> Isn't it queue 1 takes whatever the value defined in the threshold i.e. >> for example mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 1 138 138 92 138, this >> takes queue 1 to 1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

that's what thresholds have to do with it. > > Jason > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Krishna > > Sent: 09/02/12 12:00 AM > > To: murr...@usa.com, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\) > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Q

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

<mailto:murr...@usa.com>, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\) Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question jason, reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25 percent then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if needs it. Isn't it que

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

nt: 09/02/12 12:00 AM To: murr...@usa.com, Randall Crumm, Dan Quinlan \(daquinla\) Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question jason, reg: If you leave priority que out configured along with shape of 25 percent then essentially que 1 can have 100 percent of the bandwidth if needs it. Isn&#

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

From: "murr...@usa.com" To: murr...@usa.com; Randall Crumm ; Dan Quinlan (daquinla) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question > Priority goes in this order > > Priority queue out > Sha

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN Qos Question

> Priority goes in this order > > Priority queue out > Shape > Share > > If lets say for example you want cos 5 to be in the priority queue but it > also states that cos 5 should have no more than 25 percent of the bandwidth. > Of course in the mappings you need to put cos 5 in que 1. Then y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS, cBarge in CME SRST

> From: Vega Wong > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS > Message-ID: ><1329905609.25199.yahoomailclas...@web65905.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi all > > Just wan

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

Hi all Just want to get some advise regarding LAN QoS. Let say if the question ask to apply priority queue and specify certain drop % based on a COS value to the interface that connect to the router. What would you do with the interface that connecting to the phone? The reason I asked is beca

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS egress queue setting

Vega, You need to follow best practices as per SRND. Thanks Shrini From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vega Wong Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:39 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS egress queue setting

Hi experts   I am working on the topic of LAN QoS. I understand we will be given tasks to modify the setting on the egress queues of the switches. The setting includes, buffer sizes, shape and share setting etc.   My question is, is there a best practise on what values these figures should chan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question

voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nowork_onlyfun Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 5:05 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question Hi Guys I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solut

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question

The weights are relative to each other. Assuming priority queue is enabled on queue 1 and having Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4 would mean: Queue 2 = 2/10 or 20% Queue 3 = 4/10 or 40% Queue 4 = 4/10 or 40% Both ways get the same results. There is no reason for the shape 3 0 0 0 unless require

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN qos question

Hi Guys I am doing a lab and little confused with the proposed solution. The requirement is that on interface queue 2 queue 3 queue 4 should share bandwidth as 20 40 40 percentage. Now what's the best answer. Interface f1/0/1 Srr-queue bandwidth share 1 2 4 4 Or Interface f1/0/1 Srr-qu

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

If they are asking to move Queues, then I don't think it matters. I would use the same threshold as the current queue. So for your example move 2 and 4 to queue 4 threshold 3. Don't forget to do the DSCP values to match. Sam. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Adil Shaikh wrote: > i think, you s

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

i think, you should use the highest available auto configured threshold for that queue. -adil On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Cristobal Priego wrote: > hello all, > > I have a question for you guys > > hopefully you can help me understand, this is way too confusing for me > > when i issue aut

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

Use the auto configured threshold is fine and modify the cos of the particular q. What you are looking at is the dscp-map to q. duy ccie #27737 voice tmobile g2 On May 31, 2011 9:21 PM, "Cristobal Priego" wrote: > hello all, > > I have a question for you guys > > hopefully you can help me under

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS

hello all, I have a question for you guys hopefully you can help me understand, this is way too confusing for me when i issue auto qos on a 3750 switch this is how the config will look like mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 thres

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lan QoS

The MLS QOS trust commands are used to determine how an internal DSCP value is derived which will be used in physical queue assignments. You either 1) Trust the incomming L2 COS value with the "mls qos trust cos" command which intern uses the COS-DSCP map to derive the internal DSCP value,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lan QoS

Hey guys, Just wanted to clear this up. So, If I use "mls qos trust cos" on an interface, from then on all the queue map, threshold map will be based on Cos-Dscp table? That is also the same for " mls qos trust dscp" dscp-cos tables will be used to convert layer2 markings to lay

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

Hi Daniel, My conclusion was based on this Doc "Catalyst 3750 Switch Software Configuration Guide", the Traffic Shaping Concept, & just some logic. Hi Vincent, If you combine "priority-queue output " and "srr-queue" commands under the same interface, queue 1 will be expedite (have whatever it need

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

Hi Wafik, Thanks for your great comments, just a little confuse for the two command" priority-queue output" and " srr-queue bandwidth shape" My question is if "regarding that enabling the priority (expedite) queue will exclude queue 1 from the SRR shaping and sharing." why there is a example in t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

Thanks very much for this. I will read more carefully about this topic looking carefully for the words in the documentation I could not find to come with some conclusion as yours. Your answer makes sense and it is very objective and I appreaciate that because this topic has beend discussed many ti

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

Giving it a second thought I have to agree with you. I might have misinterpreted what Vik said (sorry Vik). So it seems it's impossible to have both priority-queue out and some form of shaping for this traffic? regards On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Wafik Maher wrote: > ut the priority traffic

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

Hi Daniel, I absolutely agree with you on the first part, regarding that enabling the priority (expedite) queue will exclude queue 1 from the SRR shaping and sharing. However, I don’t think that it is possible to control the bandwidth percentages using the buffer size allocation “mls qos queue-

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

ansformation Pattern at the gateway level to convert > >> the call. I got the same result. Call succeeds. The display on HQ > >> Phone 2 shows "To: 98884343". What am I missing? Is this task > >> possible? > >> > >> Thanks in advance, >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

Thanks sir for your reply. This is my understanding for quite a while and i hope i am not wrong for all this time. So i'm happy that you agree. This goes inline to the document 3750 QoS configuration examples - The document does not state this objectively and I'm finding weird the fact of seeing

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

Hi Daniel, I had to review again my notes and the documentation to tell for sure (wish I knew it out of my head as earlier I was studying a lot of the lan qos theory). You are correct, the srr-queue bandwidth shape means nothing when you configure the priority queue out. As it says on the doc: "A

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS> Priority and buffer size

Hello Can someone confirm my understanding. The below question implies the use of priority-queue out inteface command. For adjusting how much bandwidth is given to the egress priority queue of a 3750/3560/2960 switch the interface command: srr-queue bandwidth shape *means nothing* The srr comma

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lan QOS Scenario

Just One more thing. I think for such requirement, we should not enable the priority-queue under the interface. It will overwrite the shape/share which is not mentioned in the question. Please correct me, if I am wrong. Thanks. Cheers, Vincent 2010/6/20 Matthew Hall <1.matt.h...@gmail.com> > F

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lan QOS Scenario

FYI, I think this is too complex to answer simply: mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 2 40 60 100 200 This line gives threshold 1 40% of the buffer space and threshold 2 60% of the buffer space, total buffer space reserved is 100% and max (threshold 3) is 200%. Reserved at 100% tells the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS priority-queue out

Hi Jammer, As per my understanding for this, yes Q1 will become a priority queue after we issue command "priority-queue out" Anyway, it is shaped to %20 so it will not starve other traffic. i.e. as long as its traffic are within the boundaries of %20, it will be served before anything e

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS priority-queue out

OK I have read everything possible on LAN QOS and here is what i am trying to understand if i am asked following 1. to put a certain cos value say 4 in the priority queue in one question and then in another question i am asked 2. to guarantee queue 1 for for 20% of the traffic and the remainin

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lan QOS Scenario

Trying to understand this a little better. Cisco's documentation is not written in very clear english. Very frustrating trying to understand the threshold values as well as the shape versus share bandwidth values. QOS. Cos 5 for queue 1 queue 2 queue 3 queue 4 0 similar to lab 2 . Queue one ha

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lan QOS Scenario

Looks good as farvas i can tell. Normally you would also enabl priority-queue on the interface Sent from my phone On Jun 8, 2010, at 8:20 PM, jammer jones wrote: Trying to understand this a little better. Cisco's documentation is not written in very clear english. Very frustrating tryin

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lan QOS Scenario

Trying to understand this a little better. Cisco's documentation is not written in very clear english. Very frustrating trying to understand the threshold values as well as the shape versus share bandwidth values. QOS. Cos 5 for queue 1 queue 2 queue 3 queue 4 0 similar to lab 2 . Queue one ha