And this was BEFORE the '47% are victims and don't pay taxes' video came out
today
I'm trying to decide if this actually helps his campaign.
People might like a candidate who drops the truth every once in a while.
Anyway, in Alan Grayson, NBC fashion, Mother Jones is practicing some
I cannot see how the RomneyBot can wriggle out of this:
There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no
matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are
dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who
believe the government
What is sad is that a lot of those 47% will still vote for Romney
simply because they agree with him on only a single issue - like
abortion.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannot see how the RomneyBot can wriggle out of this:
There
unfortunately, the worst part is he tried to insult the 47% for obama
(who he is right probably wont vote for him).
but then he conflated that group with the victims, and further
grouped in the no tax payers, and the social moochers.
think of that venn diagram.
unfortunately for mitt, those
What's the Matter with Kansas all over again.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
What is sad is that a lot of those 47% will still vote for Romney
simply because they agree with him on only a single issue - like
abortion.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:03
The tax foundation has a map that shows which states are the real tax
moochers, and which states pay more than their fair share. Surprise
surprise, the mooching states are all majority republican states, and
the tax payers, are mostly blue states.
Some of the maps on the Tax foundation site are very interesting.
http://taxfoundation.org/maps?page=1
For instance one of the thigns that Romney complains about, the
distribution of the EIC entitlements, as he calls it, maps very
closely to majority Republican states.
I doubt his supporters will hear about this, nor will they care.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
Of course, facts have a liberal bias.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt his supporters will hear about this, nor will they care.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
You're using Gmail, after changing your password, turn on Two Factor
Authentication.
http://bit.ly/Pw3CUs
If the mail is in your sent folder, someone's really sending through your
account, not through some open relay with your address as the from
address.
Is this spam? Prank?
-Cameron
On
What he says is generally true, except the percentage is way off. Some
people vote for Obama for this reason, but not all.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
I cannot see how the RomneyBot can wriggle out of this:
There are 47 percent of the
It's gibberish. Long strings of random words.
I've been meaning to go to two factor authentication for a while.
Oh well.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
You're using Gmail, after changing your password, turn on Two Factor
Authentication.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:53 AM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
It's gibberish. Long strings of random words.
Maybe someone poisoning spam filters?
I've been meaning to go to two factor authentication for a while.
It's a little extra time now and then to setup but you'll be much
Conveniently ignoring the retired for instance. Also ignoring social
security and payroll taxes. And lookie here, all those entitled tax
cheats appear to be in most red states.
http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/UserFiles/Image/Fiscal%20Facts/20100524-229-nonpayers-map-.jpg
Thanks for the recommendation, Cam. I just set that up on my domain. Good
stuff.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:53 AM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
It's gibberish. Long strings of random words.
Maybe
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Ray Champagne r...@raychampagne.comwrote:
Thanks for the recommendation, Cam. I just set that up on my domain. Good
stuff.
Always glad to pontificate about security and paranoia!
-Cameron
...
Speaking of ignoring...
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
Conveniently ignoring the retired for instance. Also ignoring social
security and payroll taxes. And lookie here, all those entitled tax
cheats appear to be in most red states.
Mother Jones is going to release another segment soon.
The Daily Currant has the scoop. Its not pretty. Someone gets called
taco jockeys. :
http://dailycurrant.com/2012/09/18/hidden-camera-tape-romney-blasts-loser-hispanics/
I think Mittens is having his Macaca moment.
I know, I KNOW, I shouldn't jump the gun until i watch the video
myself, but WOW.
If that is true, . screech
It appears the Daily Currant is a joke site a la the Onion.
Larry, you suck. and i suck for spreading it.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Larry C. Lyons
GMail double auth requires a cell phone.
*sigh*
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Ray Champagne r...@raychampagne.com
wrote:
Thanks for the recommendation, Cam. I just set that up on my domain.
Good
stuff.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:53 AM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
GMail double auth requires a cell phone.
can't use google voice #?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:53 AM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
GMail double auth requires a cell phone.
Two factor authentication, by definition, is 1) something you know
(password) and 2) something you have (cell phone).
Many corporate environments have the RSA keyfobs as the something
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:53 AM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
GMail double auth requires a cell phone.
Two factor authentication, by definition, is 1) something you know
(password) and 2) something you
I just set it up.
It doesn't have to be text, they should be able to call your regulr phone I
would thing.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:19 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:53 AM,
Oh yeah I think there is a voice option. Of course that assumes (if you
don't have a cell) that you're near your landline when you need to access
your email.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:22 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't have to be text, they should be able to call your
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:19 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, i do. It's sitting dead in a drawer somewherewhere all cell phones
belong.
Decision, meet consequence. :)
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe
http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/f141/?cpg=46635381msg_id=46635381et_rid=843290368linkid=46635381_headline_f141
--
Larry C. Lyons
web: http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/larryclyons
~|
Order
Mother Jones is going to release the video in Full soon.
So that would answer those who say some of it was taken out of context.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Do you honestly think that they would do so? For the the true believer
its doen't matter what the facts show, they will believe the opposite.
Facts don't matter to them.
After all its well know that facts have a liberal bias.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you can use a home phone...they can send a voice message
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
I'm on my email all the time. Two factor authent that isn't always nearby
is too much trouble.
And, of course, what if my cell is stolen or lost?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on my email all the time. Two factor authent that isn't always nearby
is too much trouble.
You may want to read up a bit on how it works. You authorize each browser
only once every 30 days. It looks like they may have
*sprawls on floor and looks at ceiling*
tooo difficut.
tooo sensible
On 18 September 2012 15:54, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.com wrote:
You may want to read up a bit on how it works. You authorize each browser
only once every 30 days. It looks like they may have changed the
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
*sprawls on floor and looks at ceiling*
Hah - yeah, It's not really all that bad...
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
I like the two-factor authentication and have been using it for awhile now.
However, there is one giant, stupendous hole in it that hopefully you
will never fall into.
I have a friend who has used two factor authentication for awhile and
who also owns an Android phone. She's pretty big on the
Maybe I am misunderstanding, but they send you the second
authentication code via a text message, so there would be a way to get
in...
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
I like the two-factor authentication and have been using it for awhile now.
Not if your phone was the one that was on record and just wiped.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Ray Champagne r...@raychampagne.com wrote:
Maybe I am misunderstanding, but they send you the second
authentication code via a text message, so there would be a way to get
in...
On Tue, Sep
Let's put it this way:
My phone is 503.555.
I set up two factor authentication. Google sends me an SMS to
503.555. with the auth code. I put it in, my phone is authorized
and two factor auth is set up.
Now my phone gets wiped by Verizon. Because it is an Android phone, I
need to set up
You can either write down and store the key somewhere safe, or get a new
one through the web interface.
The original text is only once. The application key is generated through a
web page.
On Sep 18, 2012 6:00 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Let's put it this way:
My phone is
Ah, ok, having never owned an android phone, I didn't realize that you had
to have a google account to activate the phone. Thanks for clarifying.
On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Judah McAuley wrote:
Not if your phone was the one that was on record and just wiped.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at
They have codes you can print out for emergencies
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
-Original
You can set up alternates...plus you still have the code you can use that
you can print out.
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
It should still be able to accept calls and text messages...just can't
access all the google features.
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
it may not be you that got hacked. It may be someone who has you in their
address book.Can't read the rest of this thread right now but I'll check on
this tonight and maybe offer a couple of suggestions.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:53 AM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
It's gibberish.
So that would answer those who say some of it was taken out of context.
Being someone who never takes anything at face value, it seems hard for me
to believe that Willard doesn't have a video recorded by his team.
So, if he does have a video, why not release it? Perhaps, his campaign
wanted
Back on the subject of Willard's video, here's a link to a Business Insider
article covering two surveys: One by CNBC and one by Yahoo Finance.
Why didn't he release it himself, maybe it is a clever plan?
Ok, fact number 1: If you have to call a 10pm emergency conference
call over a leaked video, it means it absolutely is not playing out
like you want it to. Don't be a fucking idiot, Jerry.
Fact number 2, if your response is to bring
Jerry,
Why the FUCK do you use his middle name?
What exactly are you implying or saying by doing so?
Can you please explain that to me?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
In it, Hussein proclaims: I Actually Believe In Redistribution
Why the FUCK do you use his middle name?
For the same reason I used Mitt's first name, Willard. I felt like it.
Did it bother you that I called Mitt by the name Willard?
Why the FUCK do you have to yell FUCK about something so meaningless?
J
-
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost
Because it makes you sound like a racist shithead, that's why.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Why the FUCK do you use his middle name?
For the same reason I used Mitt's first name, Willard. I felt like it.
Did it bother you that I called Mitt by
Exactly.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Because it makes you sound like a racist shithead, that's why.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Why the FUCK do you use his middle name?
For the same reason I used
Jerry,
I see that you are concerned when Barry is called by his middle name,
Hussein. It doesn't bother you when Mitt is called by the name Willard.
I believe your concern borders on racism. You seem to think that there is
something wrong with the name Hussein and that Barry shouldn't be
That's just playing around with semantics.
One has a particular connotation , and one does not, and everyone knows it.
On 18 September 2012 22:18, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry,
I see that you are concerned when Barry is called by his middle name,
Hussein. It doesn't
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
That's just playing around with semantics.
One has a particular connotation , and one does not, and everyone knows it.
And there you have it, you have a better chance of being elected when you
go by a middle name that is also
Yes on certainly has a connotation associated with it. One that I think
you guys should really consider.
I've read the man's words, and watched his actions, and I think his middle
name and what it represents is just another indication that he is not the
right man for the job.
I'm not saying
One*
Due*
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:47 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes on certainly has a connotation associated with it. One that I think
you guys should really consider.
I've read the man's words, and watched his actions, and I think his middle
name and what it represents
One has a particular connotation , and one does not, and everyone knows
it.
Which one has a connotation?
I'll guess Hussein since that's the name Jerry seems to dislike so much.
What is this connotation? I am not sure I do know it so fill me in on it.
Why is not okay to call a man by his
hahaha
You really poked the hornets nest with this one.
Good job
:)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
One has a particular connotation , and one does not, and everyone knows
it.
Which one has a connotation?
I'll guess Hussein since that's the
But, but, but, it's racist.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:11 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
hahaha
You really poked the hornets nest with this one.
Good job
:)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.comwrote:
One has a particular connotation , and one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=J1o0ooNn8Qc#!
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:11 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
But, but, but, it's racist.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:11 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
hahaha
You really poked the hornets nest with this
Yes on certainly has a connotation associated with it. One that I think you
guys should really consider.
Nah. The name is a diversion.
I've read the man's words, and watched his actions,
This is what people should be considering.
What I am saying is that he spent large amounts of his
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:11 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
But, but, but, it's racist.
Just because we choose to call you by the one part of your name the
evokes the name of one of the greatest enemies of our country who the
last administration spent 8 years demonizing and telling
It's a Muslim name though, not a black one.
Jesus.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:11 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
But, but, but, it's racist.
Just because we choose to call you by the one part of your name
And you'll know when the other side starts hitting that point when
they start calling him Willard Goebbels Romney.
In the mean time...racist as fuck.
Judah
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Not even a little and totally missing the point. It is intentionally
provocative? Sure, but that doesn't make it racist. Every president has
had names used against them, usually not their own. Some of the things I
remember people on this list calling Bush at the time...
Nah man. Way to
No shit, Tim.
It's used for demonizing. Do you think the people who call him Hussein
care? Really?
Sand niggers. House niggers. Whatever. Think about it.
What possible point would anyone...anyone...have for calling him that
other than demonization? Other than making him an enemy based on his
http://yoisthisracist.com/
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:40 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
Not even a little and totally missing the point. It is intentionally
provocative? Sure, but that doesn't make it racist. Every president has
had names used against them, usually not their own.
Provacative based on race and nothing else. Tell me what the other
provocation is. Where is the irony? Where is the humor? Explain to
everyone why it is not racist as fuck. Let's hear it.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:40 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
Not even a little and totally missing
Demonizing is not racist by it's face,
If someone said He's a Nation of Islam black power blah blah blah N-word
that you used several times that's racist.
I know what racists act like. They mainly aren't afraid to make it
obvious. I've been on the other side against enough of them.
On Tue,
Islam is not a race. It is a religion.
Is it possibly bigoted to use it to point out that he was raised Muslim? I
would say that depends on who is using it and how it is being used.
I've never seen anything from Jerry to make me think he is bigoted. As a
matter of fact it is likely that I am
For fucks sake, Tim, have you not been listening to these people?
They've said he's Nation of Islam, they've said he's black power,
they've said he's not American, that Holder is advancing a black
agenda...they've said all that and more.
Racist as fuck.
After questioning his birth, repeatedly,
Did Jerry say any of those things?
I've never seen it.
Now who is being bigoted? Painting with a broad brush neh?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:
For fucks sake, Tim, have you not been listening to these people?
They've said he's Nation of
It also makes you sound like a complete and utter idiot...
Refereeing to someone by their middle name is not a normal naming
convention. By specifically, and in a derogatory fashion, referring to him
by his middle name, you are also implying that there is something wrong with
having ancestors
It is being racist...any why are you responding to yourself Tim?
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
I've read the man's words, and watched his actions,
This is what people should be considering.
Then why are you not focusing n that instead of calling him by his middle
name if that is what people should be focusing on Jerry? Or is that you
really are just a racist moron?
Goebbels was much smarter...
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel: 630-486-5255
fax: 630-310-8531
http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
-Original Message-
From:
Oh good, Eric's here to call me a racist too. Now if we can get Larry to
jump in it'll be the trifecta. But he probably can't read my comments
anymore. Oh well.
Shall I go copy and paste your bigoted anti-christian remarks.
Your hypocracy knows no bounds.
On Sep 18, 2012 11:56 PM, Eric
I was just using the gmail interface, that's how it works.
On Sep 18, 2012 11:56 PM, Eric Roberts ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
wrote:
It is being racist...any why are you responding to yourself Tim?
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
So, wait...
Only people who say Hussein Obama is in favor of black power and the
nation of islam which wants niggers to rule us all are racist?
Because that is really going to narrow the field down substantially.
Let's go back and start from my lemmas:
1. Some people like to refer to the
I don't think you are a racist, Tim. I've called Jerry one, but not you.
I have plenty of issues with the President and I know you do too. I
disagree with a number of your solutions to situations but I do not
think they are motivated by race. Where you disagree with the
President, it is largely
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/18/obama-mitt-romney-video_n_1895038.html
See what obama has to say about the 47%
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
haha
You said these people.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:
For fucks sake, Tim, have you not been listening to these people?
They've said he's Nation of Islam, they've said he's black power,
they've said he's not American, that Holder is
Muslim is a religion and it in now way means Arabic. His father was Kenyan
and the man that gave him his current name Indonesian.
Missed it by that much ||
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
It also makes you sound like a complete and
Because it's funny and obviously gets a rise out of you people?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I've read the man's words, and watched his actions,
This is what people should be considering.
Then why are you not focusing n that
That's awesome.
Good job Eric.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Goebbels was much smarter...
Three Ravens Consulting
Eric Roberts
Owner/Developer
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
tel:
Ok, Tim.
Let us say Jerry and the ilk he has repeatedly supported.
I laid out my lemmas in precise detail and order.
Don't give me this glancing blow shit. Engage. Discuss.
Enough of this pussy footing around.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:19 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
haha
You
Do I need to define ilk? And supported?
Or are you ready to actually engage and grow a pair?
Judah
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Ok, Tim.
Let us say Jerry and the ilk he has repeatedly supported.
I laid out my lemmas in precise detail and
Wait, do I need to define pair?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Do I need to define ilk? And supported?
Or are you ready to actually engage and grow a pair?
Judah
~|
Order the
Nope, if his middle name was Malcolm or Farrakhan you might be closer.
I've already said it could certainly be construed as bigoted. Why do you
insist that it has to be racist as well. Simply put it isn't, and whatever
associations you draw from the name are your own.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at
I don't see that anything he said is racist. It doesn't mention race, and
the way in which the name is provocative is it's tie to the former leader
of Iraq, a man of a different race than the president.
I have already said, yes it is inflammatory, so what? Calling Bush a Nazi
War Criminal
Weak, dude. Weak.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Look at those lemmas. They don't exist in isolation and you damn well know it.
You say it doesn't have to be racist. Cool. Provide an alternate
explanation that fits the facts.
Judah
On Tue, Sep 18,
1. Some people like to refer to the President as Hussein
I'm with ya
2. The only logical reason to refer to him as Hussein is to cause
divisiveness
Agreed
3. The divisiveness caused by that nomenclature would be due to the
mental context between the middle name of our current President and
Bush was not a Nazi war criminal. War criminal? Yeah, probably, but
that has nothing to do with Nazis.
So, once again, provide another reason why someone would call our
President by Hussein other then conflating Black + Muslim.
If your entire argument is that Islam isn't a race...the dude isn't
And yes. Almost everyone that uses Hussein when referring to Obama at their
core has a racist agenda.
All the birthers, his GOP opponents etc. To use Hussein after the history
of the last 4 years is clearly setting up a premise that he isn't American,
is a muslim and doesn't belong etc. etc.
I
It is using the dislike of Muslims. I'm not claiming otherwise. I'm not
saying it's not bigoted.
I'm saying not racist.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:
Weak, dude. Weak.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing.
Ok, explain the rationale for calling him Hussein.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:34 PM, LRS Scout lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Some people like to refer to the President as Hussein
I'm with ya
2. The only logical reason to refer to him as Hussein is to cause
divisiveness
Agreed
3. The
Fucked up?
Sure.
Funny as hell, absolutely.
Conflating black and Muslim, no way. Again Muslim.
At a minimum he is an Ex-Muslim, and that's more than enough for me.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:
Bush was not a Nazi war criminal. War criminal?
So the entire argument is a fine distinction between bigotry toward a
religion the President doesn't have and a racial background he does
have? Is that it?
If so...I guess?
So if Tim is right, then I apologize for calling Jerry a racist and am
just a damn sight more confused that he's a bigot
To tie him to Muslims and make him look bad. Whether it's true or not is
irrelevant. Just like calling Bush a Nazi.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:
Ok, explain the rationale for calling him Hussein.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:34 PM, LRS Scout
Exactly.
Words have meanings, and that's what this whole argument was about.
Racist was misused and Angel and Eric are still doing so.
Anyone here can feel free to call me a bigot for my opinions on Islam, I
accept that. I however will not accept the word racist. It has nothing to
do with
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
