Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:49:47 -0500
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
How do you know that the only plan that exists is to attack Iraq? This is not
something that should be public knowledge. And planning is not
nice if they were at least informed if not
consulted :)
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:28:56 -0500
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dana,
I am not sure
f not
consulted :)
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:28:56 -0500
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dana,
I am not sure where you are going with this. Would you prefer we as
ct: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We discussed this last week. The left was saying the
NIH was forced to change their Web site. The study
that said there was no link came out years after the
study that did say there was a link. So they might be
toying w
ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:06 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
how can you abuse something that gives you almost unlimited power?
Remember this statement comes from the administration of a man who
eight months into planning the invasion of Iraq
that there was no plan of attack on
> his
> > desk. Ya. It was
> > on Cheney's desk. Or maybe Rice's.
> >
> > Dana
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> excuse me.
>
> When did breast cancer become a "left-wing" issue?
>
> Dana
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 22:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
> Subj
Blanket insults do not a refutation constitute, my son :)
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You're babbling :)
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:18:04 -0500
> Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Uh huh. IMO, ust because she was part of the Clinton
> administration
> doesn't make her automatically right. Waco, cl
of attack on his desk. Ya. It was
on Cheney's desk. Or maybe Rice's.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:18:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Uh huh. IMO,
excuse me.
When did breast cancer become a "left-wing" issue?
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 22:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- "L
Uh huh. IMO, ust because she was part of the Clinton administration
doesn't make her automatically right. Waco, clipper chip, etc.
-Kevin
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no abuse of the Patriot Act. None.
Yeah, that's right. Snatch and
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Say what. Claiming that the group is some vague
> commie,
> anti-capitalist group is not refuting the charges.
> All these different
> claimshave been adequately documented (see the
> footnotes). Try again
> monkey boy.
>
> larry
Did you reply to
Say what. Claiming that the group is some vague commie,
anti-capitalist group is not refuting the charges. All these different
claimshave been adequately documented (see the footnotes). Try again
monkey boy.
larry
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:46:51 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
Now you should know I disagree with almost everything
Reno say's :)
http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpros283908538jul28,0,1661376.story?coll=ny-viewpoints-headlines
As former Attorney General Janet Reno told the 9/11
Commission, "Generally everything that's been done in
the Patriot Act has
He could have been the VP candidate - the Supremes would have had a meltdown :)
- Original Message -
From: Doug White
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
I doubt either side of the aisle would deny that if Cl
take your pick :)
>
> for the following... please tell me you are kidding
> :)
>
> > I think we need the patriot act and Bush didn't
> put
> > the panties on the prisoner's head.
Which part?
-sm
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free s
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for the following, I would like to see a link
> > Bush tried to push through free medication for
> seniors
> > but couldn't get the 2/3 votes to pass it. He had
> to
> > settle for the current watered down version, which
> is
> > still better than
At 13:58 8/3/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>I'm pro choice, my car gets over 30 mpgs and I don't
>have a strong opinion about guns.
>I believe in the Democrat's vision that we should help
>the needy. I also believe the current party has lost
>that vision.
>
>-sm
Thanks.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
Say what you may about him, he did manage to turn back every challenge, from
his
personal life to an impeachment attempt from the Right.
Say what you want about Bush, he won the election. Do you like him now? Same
logic as you. You can do much better
Say what you may, he did manage to get
I'm pro choice, my car gets over 30 mpgs and I don't
have a strong opinion about guns.
I believe in the Democrats vision that we should help
the needy. I also believe the current party has lost
that vision.
-sm
--- Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any issues that you deviate fro
03, 2004 3:43 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
based on your previous statements I am guessing that you don't think
Clinton was a good president. So I guess you can use him to make my
point, if it makes ya happy :) He *was* a great speaker.
But th
I doubt either side of the aisle would deny that if Clinton were eligible to run
for re-election, it would be a landslide win! Most every poll of whatever
persuasion has clearly indicated that.
Say what you may about him, he did manage to turn back every challenge, from his
personal life to an im
at your leisure. I would like to know though, eventually. And do you
base the opinion on all coverage or on the coverage of specific
issues?
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Judith Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:12:50 -0400
Subject: Re: Kerry's record i
Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:24:10 -0500
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Clinton?
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 3:17 PM
To: CF-C
for the following, I would like to see a link
> Bush tried to push through free medication for seniors
> but couldn't get the 2/3 votes to pass it. He had to
> settle for the current watered down version, which is
> still better than what was in place 4 years ago.
> In the news today; US indu
can't prove it by me :)
> So, under Bush, the Rich made less and paid more, and the bottom 50% made
> more but paid less.
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Clinton?
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 3:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
That may be an attitude that is imposed by circumstances. And exciting
and charismatic leaders ma
ugust 02, 2004 6:55 PM
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> Well, the people of Texas seemed to think he had a pretty good record, they
> voted for him.
>
> _
>
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 02
ody else in.
>
> _
>
> From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:01 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
>
>
> > What is the cost in lives if Kerry tu
At 12:47 8/3/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>I see a lot of people here to the extreme left.
>When I counter with truths, I get accused of being
>extreme right. Problem is I'm in the middle and only
>look like an extremist because you are. I guess we
>need a mediator :)
>
>-sm
Sam,
Is there any issues th
Along the same lines, Sam --
Many a time I see people here who have very negative feelings towards religion and the Bible. While I know that the Torah is true, I have stopped arguing about it (except in certain cases) because I realize that I won't be able to sway the minds of people who are so d
trying to understand how you see things, Sam.
> Not really sure
> why I am bothering but I am.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
> To: CF-Comm
At 14:27 8/3/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>Sorry, don't by it and neither to any economists that I know or have read.
>
> -Original Message-
>From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 1:53 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Kerry
I am trying to understand how you see things, Sam. Not really sure
why I am bothering but I am.
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Sorry, don't by it and neither to any economists that I know or have read.
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 1:53 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
As I recall, he started talking about wha
OTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 1:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
Andy,
someone (Sandy?) just posted that there is a plan up now on the
johnkerry.com website. Have not looked at it yet so I can't comment.
But look at it this way. If I
OK, your boring me.
-sm
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam
>
> Your continual posting of generic political
> statements and obfuscated
> information really is not displaying much
> intelligence on your part. Your
> comments that "This is a lie" every time you are
> shown evidence
Mainstream media is mainly biased to the left.
Talk radio is biased to the right.
I thought everybody knew that.
-sm
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I can tell all sources but yours are
> biased according to you?
>
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y
> Dana
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:46:18 -0500
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Actually, I am not a Bush fan. He has spen
As far as I can tell all sources but yours are biased according to you?
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I did address it by sh
Sam
Your continual posting of generic political statements and obfuscated
information really is not displaying much intelligence on your part. Your
comments that "This is a lie" every time you are shown evidence of error, or
claiming the source biased, and then you back off into the very bias tha
ssage -
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- "Tangorre, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What has Bush done to show that he dese
As I recall, he started talking about what terrible shape the economy
was in and both consumer confidence and the stock market took a nose
dive :)
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 06:43:17 -0500
Subject: RE: Kerry's record i
---
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:46:18 -0500
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Actually, I am not a Bush fan. He has spent way to much, should have waited
2-6 months to give France and Germany a chance to
--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for your link
> about the VA funding, did
> you read down further where it did talk about how
> there was a proposed cut
> and that the VA had to start turning away middle
> income vets because of lack
> of funding. The issue is a lot more complex t
se of lack
of funding. The issue is a lot more complex than he did/didn't cut VA
funding.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:34 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
>
--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Truthfully, I don't think providing
> data/links/information really works with
> you. Mainly what I get back from you is cut/paste
> from RushLimbaugh.com so
> I thought I'd try a different approach.
Please back this up. When was I provided REAL
data/
ginal Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 11:51 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> --- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Our 43rd president was born of a coca
It's a cut because it won't finance what's needed. Also, proposed cuts to
VA benefits were defeated in congress last year.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 11:36 AM
> To: CF-Community
>
503.htm
>
> Seattle Weekly
>
>
http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0315/news-anderson.php
>
>
> http://www.house.gov/larson/pr_030523.htm
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Sam Morris
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12
--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our 43rd president was born of a cocaine user...so
> what's your point?
Do you do that with every issue? Throw out some
outrageous lie to try to change the subject?
-sm
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more stor
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
Funding for Veterans up 27%, But Democrats Call It A
Cut
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=144
-sm
--- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL P
I did address it by showing your source is extremely
biased. If you have any other sources that back up
your claim Ill address it.
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what. That crud is completely irrelevant. The
> issue is the Shrub
> administration's heavy handed injection
Funding for Veterans up 27%, But Democrats Call It A
Cut
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=144
-sm
--- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about the cutting of veteran's benefits?
> Strange to be doing that with one hand while sending
> current military personnel off to war
I did address that in another email.
Why did you jump subjects?
Do you now agree the Gorelick Memo built a wall? Can
you stop saying it doesn't in future references?
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No comments about the administration's stacking
> scientific advisory
> comm
Perhaps they are as biased as they are reported Bush to be?
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:56 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
Our 43rd president was born of a cocaine user...so w
Our 43rd president was born of a cocaine user...so what's your point?
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:19 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> Try this one
So what. That crud is completely irrelevant. The issue is the Shrub
administration's heavy handed injection of a far right wing ideology
into scientific research.
You still have not addressed the facts in the document.
Ideologues in review panels. Censoring of congressional reports.
Removal of d
rry's record in Senate
No comments about the administration's stacking scientific advisory
committees, or the injection of ideology into review panels. How about
their declaration of increased scrutiny of grants that use the phrase
"gay" or "environmental" in the a
No comments about the administration's stacking scientific advisory
committees, or the injection of ideology into review panels. How about
their declaration of increased scrutiny of grants that use the phrase
"gay" or "environmental" in the applications, or censoring submitted
articles to peer revi
Try this one:
http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/145
The Union of Concerned Scientists was born out of a
protest against the war in Vietnam. In 1969, a group
of 48 faculty members at MIT -- the original union
-- sponsored a one-day work stoppage of scientific
research. A
We went over this already, how soon you forget.
Let's try this again. Bookmark it this time.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=m:5:13438:121325
I did read it.
And it defintly builds a wall.
U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White was concerned that
Gorelick's new guidelines for investigations
Sam,
About Gorelick. If you actually read the memo instead of parrotting
the limpblob propanganda, you will notice that she advocated lowering
the so-called walls between the various intelligence communities. Also
it was a republican sponsored bill that was signed by Bush Sr. that
established thos
Try this link from the Union of Concerned Scientists regarding how the
current administration has been perverting the scientific advisory
process by packing committees with ideological extremists,
deliberately misrepresenting study reports to support the
adminstration agenda, and suppressing eviden
ge-
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:54 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
Viewing the national economy as a whole, the figures are more like 3 to 3.5
million jobs lost due to the downturn, and since Bush took offic
> > 2. His main source of intelligence about Iraq
was
> > not what all you are quoting,
> > but was from the Iraq Ex-patriots who fed him
> > completely false information.
> > Ex=patriots who were being paid $450,000 per
> year
> > from the US treasury.
> Yes we didnt have spies on t
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reasons to vote out Bush:
>
> 1. Record Setting deficit with tax cuts for the rich
> - placing the burden on the
> middle class for generations.
> Government spending continues unabated. F
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reasons to vote out Bush:
>
> 1. Record Setting deficit with tax cuts for the rich
> - placing the burden on the
> middle class for generations.
> Government spending continues unabated. For
> reversing the prior trend of Pay
> as you go, to massive d
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme
And Federalizing the airport screeners which violates the 4th amendment.
Interesting you mention that, now that they are seeing that the Federalization
is not working as intended, they are now asking to go back to private screening
contractors
Viewing the national economy as a whole, the figures are more like 3 to 3.5
million jobs lost due to the downturn, and since Bush took office, there have
been less than a million new jobs created, so there is still a net loss of jobs
in the overall economy.. Hardly a scenario to brag about
Actuall
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:56:41 -0500, Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reasons to vote out Bush:
> 20. Masc. items, The Patriot Act, The prisoner handing, The anti-constitution
> Attorney General, and more.
Don't forget: Covertly detained and held incommunicado US citizens.
And when confronte
So they were able to realize an extra $142 for the year in tax savings.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> Also, here is
: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:00 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
The is from their finance division - is I think is a part of their
bankruptcy
reorganization. It was just on my mind. last week there was a company that
laid
off several hundred workers, and another the
top 5% ($127,904 yr) pay 53.25% they earn 31.99
-sm
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:10 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
> >
> > --- Mar
8:34 PM
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
One thing I have a question with here, is it possible the reason MCI is
laying people off because they are losing subscribers, because of the
quality of their service?
I don't know, but the fact that a company is losing jobs doesn&#x
e but paid less.
_
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:37 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
ok Sam here's my source. They've got a nice little table that lists it all
sorts of ways.
http://www.taxfounda
t: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
ok Sam here's my source. They've got a nice little table that lists it all
sorts of ways.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/prtopincometable.html#TotalAdjustedGross
I'm not sure what you're getting at because according to your numbers, the
bott
me, so how does that refute my
statement?
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:10 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> --- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, seem like pretty smart people if you ask me.
But hey, I'm from Kentucky, where our current slogan is: "At least we aren't
Tennessee"
_
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:15 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry'
my income
has gone up, and my taxes have gone down.
_
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:57 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
7, For wrecking the US economy, some have gotten jobs, here in S. A. the
layoffs
continue as
What do you expect - I mentioned the education record, didn't I?
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
Well, the people of Texas seemed to think he had a pretty g
Save a horse, ride a cowboy!
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
Love this one Democratic party button I saw a photo of
Stop Mad Cowboy Di
--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:47 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
> >
> > Top 50%
August 02, 2004 2:00 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> funny.
>
> we never knew what bush would do in the white house. no one does,
> apart from a second term president. and thank god it wont be bush.
> we know he has messed t
Reasons to vote out Bush:
1. Record Setting deficit with tax cuts for the rich - placing the burden on the
middle class for generations.
Government spending continues unabated. For reversing the prior trend of Pay
as you go, to massive debt which will absorb an increasing portion of
productivity
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:47 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> Top 50% of wage earners pay 96.03% of all federal
> income tax. Should it be 100%?
Sam,
x27;s not one I like to hear, but it's a lot more valid
than many I've heard. (A friend of mine the other day actually told she's
voting for Bush because "he's so cute when he talks" - now that's gotta
trump basic contempt.) ;^)
Jim Davis
From: Nick McClure [mail
nt: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:37 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
wrong.
if i elect someone, they are to listen to the constituency, and vote
based on that.
if they arent, i live in north korea, and who cares wtf i say.
but we are here, in america, not toby keiths amer
>What has Bush done to show that he deserves to stay in and lead? Let's
>recap:
>Gave the wealthiest Americans a tax break while the middle class continues
>to struggle.. Not to mention the less fortunate of the US still get
shafted.
Interesting, I got a tax cut, Kerry hasn't proposed anything t
Not this Texan, or his family.
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure
Well, the people of Texas seemed to think he had a pretty good record, they
voted for him.
_
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and
uld not send in troops
unless they are authorized by the UN, that is an idea that will not get my
vote.
_
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:23 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
couldnt it be, though, that the changing of
Kerry did miss one vote where the bill lost by one, it was for the extension
of the unemployment benefits.
_
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>From what I remember from hig
the
majority of your district, but the question of voting record is still valid.
In the end the vote is still up to the Representative, not the district.
_
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:59 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in S
]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
I wasn't posting it as a for/against comment. Just information. It's
worth noting that the list of votes only goes back to 2003.
I know the absent vote record is a point that the Republ
ess, he's never actually
been there.
_
From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:46 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
Actually, I am not a Bush fan. He has spent way to much, should have waited
2-6 months to give Fr
is guy out than voting somebody else in.
_
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:01 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
> What is the cost in lives if Kerry turns about to be an ineffectual
leader?
No more than n
Well, the people of Texas seemed to think he had a pretty good record, they
voted for him.
_
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 1:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
Don't forget - Bush had no Washington expe
This whole loved by the world thing is overrated.
I agree with what Rabbi Shmuley Boteach has to say:
...
AMERICA IS hated by the nations of the world almost
entirely due to its support of Israel and the war in
Iraq. The United States is the great champion of
Israel and is therefore loathed by a
>couldnt it be, though, that the changing of the guard here, bush out -
>kerry in, would aid in our foreign policy. it would send the LARGEST
>message to the world. far louder than any incumbent group's policy
>shift. they dont like bush, no one does, and as the days go on, their
>anger is fuele
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
