with that same name that I should be
looking for?
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
oh boy. Try google news. I refuse to believe that that's
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
wow.
I am in awe, seriously. Denial is a powerful force.
Tim, you've never heard of Seymour Hersh, have you. Or have you just
never
read careful reporting before? The article may well be coming out of
Langley
Dana wrote:
But why try to educate you guys? Your minds are made up and...This stuff gets
old.
Don't worry guys, I speak Dana, I can translate this for you:
My case is weak and I'm not good at articulating it so I hide behind
assumptions and accusations that allow me to bow out of the
.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
oh boy. Try google
.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 7:07 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
You mean the same Laura Berg
Wow, that's a perfect description of you GG. :)
On 4/25/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
My case is weak and I'm not good at articulating it so I hide behind
assumptions and accusations that allow me to bow out of the discussion
with a self-deluded pride.
This prevents me from having to face the fact
No, that is just criticism.
And she wasn't actually charged, she was investigated and found to not be a
threat.
_
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
We need to wake
RoMunn wrote:
they are evil. And not in a we kick
journalists out of events kind of way. They are evil in a We want to
annihilate the population of Israel and the US kind of way.
Which is where Dana is breaking the 80/20 rule. Does Bush suck?
Sure. Has he made some things worse? Yup. But
, April 23, 2006 4:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
I think this will be the fifth time I have posted it and the third time in
this thread. But ok. It is rather important to my opinion that the things
you are saying are the administration's public statements
, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 4:45 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
well yes, selective reading would be one
-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 4:57 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
you're kidding, right?
Which human rights have we violated in that past couple of years
, April 23, 2006 5:08 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
::points and laughs::
It's to nice a day to listen to people shout the neocon party line at me,
hehe.
~|
Message: http
-3911
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:26 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
wow.
I am in awe, seriously. Denial is a powerful force.
Tim, you've never heard of Seymour Hersh, have you
.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
oh boy. Try google news
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
oh boy. Try google news. I refuse to believe that that's a serious question.
We could have a megathread in which copious examples would be cited and at
the end Nick would say yeah
I think this will be the fifth time I have posted it and the third time in this
thread. But ok. It is rather important to my opinion that the things you are
saying are the administration's public statements only, so here it is again.
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060417fa_fact
well yes, selective reading would be one defense and denial would be another.
::shrug::
Please feel free to believe what validates your previous beliefs.
The Pentagon adviser on the war on terror confirmed that some in the
Administration were looking seriously at this option, which he linked
except for post-war Iraq and for predicted hurricanes :\
Of course they do, we have plans for EVERYTHING
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205219
Archives:
you're kidding, right?
Which human rights have we violated in that past couple of years?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205220
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
um, no... It's usually the Canadians and the Australians and a few others in my
recollection...
They usually ask the US.
UN
group staffed by Iranians to keep the peace in Israel?
~|
Message:
this thread is about batty civilians telling the Pentagon that they want to use
nuclear weapons.
If it were me, I'd have worked with the very considerable emigre population in
the United States, and refrained from provocations such as stupidly invading
its neighbors for reasons still
::points and laughs::
It's to nice a day to listen to people shout the neocon party line at me, hehe.
Don't most religious people talk to god? Isn't that what praying is
all about? Or do you think there's a burning bush :) in the
Whitehouse? I showed you the quote where he says his faith in
23, 2006 4:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
I think this will be the fifth time I have posted it and the third time in
this thread. But ok. It is rather important to my opinion that the things
you are saying are the administration's public statements only
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 4:45 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
well yes, selective reading would be one defense and denial would be another.
::shrug::
Please feel
: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
you're kidding, right?
Which human rights have we violated in that past couple of years?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205233
Archives: http
, 2006 4:59 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
um, no... It's usually the Canadians and the Australians and a few others in
my recollection...
They usually ask the US.
UN
group staffed by Iranians to keep the peace in Israel
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 5:08 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
::points and laughs::
It's to nice a day to listen to people shout the neocon party line at me,
hehe.
Don't most religious people talk to god? Isn't that what praying is
all
That is one interpretation of the situation. Another interpretation is that
they are simply repeating what has been stated US policy since the 1950s.
Yet another interpretation is that this is all a big bluff on the part of
the administration to try to get Iran to back down. But that is just
you still haven't read the Hersh story have you. Little point in continuing the
discussion in the circumstances.
Nobody is saying lets break out the nukes, they are saying that is we
have to we'll use them.
~|
Message:
Bushy is on record as saying he talks to God :) not a good thing in the keeper
of nuclear capability imho. I'll ignore your childish swipe at Carter.
So you're saying because of Carter they can no longer be trusted?
I agree.
On 4/21/06, Dana Tierney wrote:
He thinks he's on a mission from
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 5:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
ok, the Russians advocate nuking Iran? Links?
Ditto the French, Chinese and Germans.
You forgot the Russians, French, Germans
I don't thnk you are stupid at all. I enjoy your participation and your
opinions, even when I disagree with you. I just think you are spending so
much time focusing on what you perceive to be your enemy - the Bush
Administration - that yuou have become blinded to all other threats.
How would it
first of all, you assume that my support of the Democrats is as blind as yours
to the Republicans sometimes seems to be. Second of all, the embassy takeover
was, Jesus, almost thirty years ago. But hey, we used bad behavior that was
almost as old as an excuse aganst the Iraqis, so that's ok...
I haven't seen a link provided for such story.
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 3:23 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
you still haven't read the Hersh story have you. Little point
Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 5:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
I haven't seen a link provided for such story.
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Which human rights have we violated in that past couple of years?
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:22 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
like the United States, you mean
Of course they do, we have plans for EVERYTHING
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:24 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
that's the public position, yes. They really are making plans
They usually ask the US.
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:26 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
how does it provide peace-keeping forces now?
Even if the UN body itself has good
Yes, the Embassy thing was almost 30 years ago, and the same murderous
regime has been in charge of Iran ever since. For most of that span, they
have had a hidden nuclear program that a prudent person can only assume,
like the rest of the hidden nuclear programs that have been sniffed out over
the
Don't most religious people talk to god? Isn't that what praying is
all about? Or do you think there's a burning bush :) in the
Whitehouse? I showed you the quote where he says his faith in god has
no influence over his decisions in running the country.
Carter created serious problems in the
RoMunn wrote:
save for the fact that they cut my taxes, so that's
ok by me.
Isn't that like saying that the thief who robbed your savings, but
gave you $100 on his way out, is a heckuva guy?
~|
Message:
Considering that the other set of thieves waiting in the the wings would
have taken my savings, the $100, and lifted my house right off its
foundation and carted it away as well, I'm ahead. The unfortunate reality is
that the Democrats and the Republicans both seem intent on ruining the long
term
RoMunn wrote:
Considering that the other set of thieves waiting in the the wings would
have taken my savings, the $100, and lifted my house right off its
foundation and carted it away as well, I'm ahead.
The implicit mistake in your logic is that one party can be the holder
of financial
Burning coal? You should all be shot. What's the cost to the
environment for the tonnes of fossil fuels you pump into the air every
year??
On 4/20/06, Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we have it wrong. Instead of burning coal and having the lowest energy
costs in the country, we in
Agreed, they are all telling Iran to stand down.
Very, very true. They are all concerned.
but they are not all advocating launching nuclear missiles at Iran.
Only the United States is doing that, and therein lies the context of
the subject matter of this post.
On 4/20/06, Jeff Garza [EMAIL
Boo hoo. Quit cryin' ya hippie.
It's Friday..
Burning coal? You should all be shot. What's the cost to the
environment for the tonnes of fossil fuels you pump into the air every
year??
On 4/20/06, Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we have it wrong. Instead of burning coal and
Dunno, but we figured out a way to do it in a fairly clean way.
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 8:17 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Burning coal? You should all be shot. What's the cost
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 8:18 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Agreed, they are all telling Iran to stand down.
Very, very true. They are all concerned.
but they are not all advocating launching nuclear missiles at Iran.
Only
---is choking and gasping for breath already
Ack! Ack! urrk! urrk! .*
On 4/21/06, Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno, but we figured out a way to do it in a fairly clean way.
~|
Message:
Hey, puff puff pass man..
---is choking and gasping for breath already
Ack! Ack! urrk! urrk! .*
On 4/21/06, Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno, but we figured out a way to do it in a fairly clean way.
not already at war with these people?
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:10 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran
Say what you want, but burning coal isn't what it used to be, new
technologies prevent the release of certain gasses.
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 8:26 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry
own life.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
He
You should all be shot.
Ladies and gentleman, I give you the left.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 8:17 AM
: Friday, April 21, 2006 8:18 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Agreed, they are all telling Iran to stand down.
Very, very true. They are all concerned.
but they are not all advocating launching nuclear missiles at Iran.
Only the United States is doing
-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Agreed, they are all telling Iran to stand down.
Very, very true. They are all concerned.
but they are not all advocating launching nuclear missiles at Iran.
Only the United States is doing that, and therein lies the context
The Bolton/Bush agenda reflects a misguided belief that absolute US
sovereignty should take precedence over international cooperation. It
also sends a message that the US government feels no responsibility
towards-or compassion for-the world's poor. ]
I am completely sick of this bullshit. If
*smirk*
I was quite clearly joking and did not mean it in any way seriously.
LOL!
On 4/21/06, Loathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should all be shot.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:204983
Archives:
, April 21, 2006 8:18 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Agreed, they are all telling Iran to stand down.
Very, very true. They are all concerned.
but they are not all advocating launching nuclear missiles at Iran.
Only the United States is doing
Gel wrote:
it outlines the United States' view of the world, it's goals and its
ambitions.
These goals are complete domination, disregard for International
Co-operation, holding the concerns of Profit for Corporations over
concerns for Humanity and the poor, and a concerted effort to Gut
Well of course it isn't effective.
How can it be effective when the US tries to gut it and stymie all its
policies and stated aims?
On 4/21/06, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am completely sick of this bullshit. If the UN was capable of wiping it's
own ass, the US wouldn't have to be the one
Ok...my time for list chat for the moment is up, and I have not found
the quote from Bolton.
So for now, I will have to say that you are correct and it was never
categorically stated that the US will strike at Iran with a nuclear
weapon, however I will say that it has been openly implied by the
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
*smirk*
I was quite clearly joking and did not mean it in any way seriously.
LOL!
On 4/21/06, Loathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should all be shot.
~|
Message: http
The US wasn't trying to guy the thing several years ago, and it was still
useless. Look at North and South Korea.
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:21 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Well
Guy = gut
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:24 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
The US wasn't trying to guy the thing several years ago, and it was still
useless. Look at North
Yes.
Me, and world leaders that are concerned about the same thing.
And you are so very right, it is ludicrous for the US to think it can
even hope to acheive that goal through force. The US does deserve it's
own comedy channel under the direction of Bush. It would be so very
funny, if it didn't
: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:22 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Well of course it isn't effective.
How can it be effective when the US tries to gut it and stymie all its
policies and stated aims?
On 4/21/06, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am completely sick
PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
tBone wrote:
The UN should be gutted. It's insane to expect that ANY sovereign
tBone wrote:
The UN should be gutted. It's insane to expect that ANY
sovereign nation would want some third party, potentially made up of his
enemies, telling him how to run his country.
I disagree with you big time on this. I think the only way to prevent
war is to have a 3rd party that
Gel wrote:
Yes.
Me, and world leaders that are concerned about the same thing.
You, of all people, should know this kind of goofy paranoia is BS -
you talk to Americans every day and only one of us, Sam, is an
Autocrat. The rest are, to one degree or another, highly critical of
this
tBone wrote:
What continue to spiral? We are in the middle of a world war.
No we're not, we've got a crime problem. When Tim McVeigh blew up the
fed building, that wasn't a war. Just a crime.
it would polarize
nations against each other, not stopping wars, but leading to them.
Somebody
OK, if you could point out a way to create a 3rd party with the moral high
ground that would be great.
But when they put known human rights violators as the chair for the
committee to prevent human rights then they've lost the high ground.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott
AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
tBone wrote:
What continue to spiral? We are in the middle of a world war.
No we're not, we've got a crime problem. When Tim McVeigh blew up the fed
building, that wasn't a war. Just a crime.
it would polarize
nations
What about the bang up job they did in Bosnia, Somalia, and Korea?
In the first Gulf War it was still the US pushing it, and the UN went along
for the ride. However when the UN tries to do something, it fails.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Somebody
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 5:18 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Agreed, they are all telling Iran to stand down.
Very, very true. They are all concerned.
but they are not all advocating launching nuclear missiles at Iran.
Only the United
you are NOT in government are you.
You do not set the policy of your nation,and the US is a democracy,
which means that the present Administration was freely voted in by
Americans. So how can you expect people outside America to be of the
opinion that these guys just happened to get into power and
Just two.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:00 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
The United States is not advocating launching nukes at Iran. They are
simply stating that it's
reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
you are NOT in government are you.
You do not set the policy of your nation,and the US is a democracy, which
means that the present Administration was freely voted in by Americans. So
how can you expect people outside America to be of the opinion that these
guys just
Since WWI...
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 7:02 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Just two.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April
Nick wrote:
OK, if you could point out a way to create a 3rd party with the moral high
ground that would be great.
Well, this is just off of the top of my head, but here goes:
Create a 3 part UN -
(1.) Governance
1.a) Executive - voted in by world elected
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Nick wrote:
OK, if you could point out a way to create a 3rd party
Who is going to be a part of those military forces? If the military forces
are provided by member nations, then they will have different commanders
with different motives.
Even if the UN body itself has good intentions, how will they order a UN
group staffed by Iranians to keep the peace in
The UN just voted an Iranian delegation to be in charge of a UN
commission.the commission? Nuclear arms limitation and
non-proliferation.
Yep...that's our UN!
Who is going to be a part of those military forces? If the military forces
are provided by member nations, then they will have
I just fell out of my chair.
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:39 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
The UN just voted an Iranian delegation to be in charge of a UN
commission
On 4/21/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
You, of all people, should know this kind of goofy paranoia is BS -
you talk to Americans every day and only one of us, Sam, is an
Autocrat. The rest are, to one degree or another, highly critical of
this administration and its policies.
So anyone that's not
Wow, you missed a lot while you were away. I was wondering why you
thought he was on your side. He was all for turning our military over
to the UN and letting them call all the shots.
On 4/21/06, Loathe wrote:
That's a world government. The whole 1984 new world order nonsense bro.
Never
Well, first, I'm not highly critical, they have done things I'm not happy
about, but I'm not highly critical.
And that 33% rating is a very interesting number, in the past we have found
the polls have been highly slanted to democratic poll takers, and they have
been based on regions that are
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:38 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Well, first, I'm not highly critical, they have done things I'm not happy
about, but I'm not highly critical.
And that 33
tBone wrote:
That's a world government. The whole 1984 new world order nonsense bro.
That's what people hyperbolize it into, but it's not. It's simply a
peace keeping and humanitarian body that we can assign the problems to
that nobody wants.
I bet if we took a poll, just about everyone in
And this in the middle of a reform agenda at the UN. Sheesh.
You know what the UN is? The cushiest job a bureaucrat could ever want. Live
in NYC, ignore traffic laws, get fat off of corrupt UN programs, and then
bash the U.S. (host of the U.N. and underwriter of 25% of its budget). Wax
eloquent
Maybe the UN should bomb the shit out of the non-Muslims again, like
they did in Serbia. That'll fix the problem. Oh yeah, that was
Clintons idea so it was a good thing.
When Hillary becomes pres she will convince the UN to protect the
Janjaweed from those evil rebels.
On 4/21/06, Gut rot wrote:
Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:19 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
tBone wrote:
That's a world government. The whole 1984 new world order nonsense bro.
That's what people hyperbolize it into, but it's
you mean the same British that said that any talk about using nuclear weapons
against Iran was just crazy? Those British?
You and I don't seem to read the same news somehow.
Oh great... Here she goes... We've been lied to again. But wait... This
time we're being lied to by the British, the
.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bramwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
Ok I'm late into this thread so the point may have already been raised
but
what the hey...
Yesterday
pft. It must really give you comfort to think that people who disagree with you
are that stupid. I have no desire to see Iran with a bomb. I wish Bush, who is
also insane, didn't have any to play with either. I don't think the Iranians
*do* have a a bomb, and possibly they aren't even trying to
reamins to be seen. But a comic book character nonetheless?
The Decider is one of the good guys. :)
On 4/20/06, Dana Tierney wrote:
what's this? Sam is going off the Bushies? I'll alert the media.
I think Marvel is working it up.
tBone wrote:
They are not our problem. As far as I am concerned humanitarian should
never be used outside of domestic issues.
Well, beyond the moral objections, I would argue that it becomes our
problem either due to immigration, terrorism, or crime. Peace, law,
and order are in all of our
Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :)
He they lied to us last time too
Dana wrote:
I wish Bush, who is also insane, didn't have any to play with either.
Nobody dislikes Bush's policies more than me (well, you do), but he's
not insane. He's ... misguided.
I don't think the Iranians *do* have a a bomb, and possibly they aren't even
trying to get one.
Wake up,
I was right with you until you brought up Helen Thomas? WTF? The women was a
respected journalist for decades, so sorry she asked a question Bush hadn't
memorized an answer for ;)
So anyone that's not highly critical of the admin is an autocrat? Are
you that simple minded that anyone that
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
