In a message dated 12/14/00 9:35:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You can also route with it using ODR...
>
> -Eddie
>
Hey, never heard of this and I never knew you could route with CDP??? If you
could, please explain to me what ODR is and why I haven't seen it in an
Check it out... ODR...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/47.html#Q1
-Eddie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 3:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What can
Was it the Cat6500 or Cat6500-OSR?
-Eddie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
inamul
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 12:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eXtreme and Cisco
There is also review on Extreme 6808 and cat65
and Cisco win
Yes I have but then it doesn't work .
I've logged a call with TAC now so lets see what they can come up with .
Ive done copy & pastes all the way to ensure no mistakes .
I'll keep you up so speed .
Cheers
Olden Pieterse
Pre-Sales Consultant
Westcon
Tel: +27 21 415 7211
Fax: +27 21 41
Okay, let's try this again. See inline for comments:
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 13, 2000 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
Subject: RE: Configuration Register and Netboot Failure
Thanks for the 3COM URL, I am still
In a message dated 12/15/00 3:37:29 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Check it out... ODR...
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/47.html#Q1
>
>
> -Eddie
>
Wow, I'm wondering why I haven't come across this in ANY of my studies. This
seems like a good solution f
I never got back to this email and I am sorry I took so long...
1) The 6509 has a 256Mbit backplane capacity.
2) I am not a Cat6500 person, but I thought the Cat6500 Sup's run in
parallel? (Anyone know off hand?)
3) I am not sure what you mean by local switching. The 6500 uses dCEF
(Distributed
I am very surprised how many people emailed me about ODR. When I first
started playing with 12.0 code I was doing "?" everywhere to see what was
new. It was the first time I ever noticed it. I think it was out before
12.0(x), but guess I never noticed it. If you want a good tip for studying
fo
Hi guys ,
any of you have purchase the CIM Routing for CCIE lab practise ?
Any review ?
cheers
kenairs
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ODR came out in 11.2, according to CCO. It is covered in Doyle.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Eddie Parra
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 1:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: What can CDP
Actually its done on butterfly ballots, then machine counted, then hand
counted, then hand counted again, this time looking for dimples. Next the
court orders another examination of your answer sheet, this time with the
purpose of divining how you intended to answer on all those questions you
may
Hi,
Im having a problem currently with my network I was wondering
if someone would advise me of what I could be doing wrong.
Currently:
BSD server-(.179)---|
|
Cisco 2611-(.180)---|
|
Cisco 3640-(.181)---|
The dlsw circuits is empty because nobody is trying to connect to
an SNA server.
The dlsw reachability is something that makes me fill unhappy.
You should see the MAC address of your AS/400 or any other SNA server
Added to that you should see the mac address of the WIN95,WIN98 PC's that
is usin
Dear All,
I have recently configured a Cisco Local Director which load balances
between 2 webservers but am having trouble
with the cabling,if I divide the switch into 2 Vlans, how do I get the
webservers attached to the local director in one Vlan to talk the other
Vlan.
I hope this explanation
The CIT course, the ACRC , and of course BOSON tests.
This 3 make me pass the test and take my CCNP !
- Original Message -
From: "John Nenye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:23 PM
Subject: FRS 2.0
>
> Has anyone on the group taken the FRS 2
I echo John's comments. While I didn't have the
ciscopress book, I did have the official course
materials from the CID class I took in 98. However, I
took the exam in September 00 so I bought the Sybex book
for review. While it did discuss X.25, SNA, & the
StrataCom Line, the exam asked qu
CCNP = BCSN + BCRAN + MSCN +CIT
CCNP= FRS + CIT
FRS 2.0 = BCSN + BCRAN + MSCN
for FRS exam in nothing but combination of bcsn, bcran,bcmsc. You can hv
single exam that is FRS in place of three exam.
Arvind.
> -Original Message-
> From: Elias Aggelidis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: F
I've got the regular IP routing and VOIP CIMs and they were OK. Haven't had
a look at the expert lab one though. If you get a chance to review it,
please post your opinion. I'm curious if it's better than the regular ones.
Charles
"Datactr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Has anyone else evaluated the possibility of switching from Frame Relay =
to a ADSL line? I have a remote site with approx. 50 users (only 25 max =
at one time using the Internet) and I am considering switching from a =
56k Frame-Relay circuit to a Tier II 768k download speed ADSL line. =
Users
Hey all,
Question:
1) On a router with multiple outbound paths, if fast switching (or CEF) =
=3D
is enabled and outbound traffic comes through towards a given =3D
destination, is all traffic for that same destination then locked to the =
=3D
same path untill the route cache is cleared?
2) If the
Hello all,
I am trying to set up a lab environment for the CCIE
and CCNP exams. Does anybody have any equipment
recommendations? Or any good used equip for sale? What
have you used?
Thanks
Ray Bohac
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of
Go for it.
DSL is faster that F/R and for my personal opinion is
better than F/R.
Of course DSL is coming through pure PSTN wires !
Take this in mind before you make your selection. But DSL is cheaper
that F/R.
Regards
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Stanger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
I have used this study group for a while now and I think someone needs to
say this, this study group is called a CISCO study group, NOT EXTREME, NOT
JUNIPER. NOT FOUNDRY or any other vendor you can think of, but CISCO, LET US
NOT FORGET THIS "RIF" Reading is fundamental. If you are going to make a
Thank you for saying this - it was a long time coming. I, for one, agree
whole-heartedly.
-Original Message-
From: NP-BASS LEON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 7:24 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: THIS IS A CISCO STUDY GROUP
I have used this study group f
does anyone have thought on the designing cisco networks book for ccda
preparation? i have completed the ccnp and the cid 3.0 test. i need this to
get my ccdp. thanks.
Craig E. Smith
Network Engineer
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.group
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, NP-BASS LEON wrote:
> I have used this study group for a while now and I think someone needs to
> say this, this study group is called a CISCO study group, NOT EXTREME, NOT
> JUNIPER. NOT FOUNDRY or any other vendor you can think of, but CISCO, LET US
> NOT FORGET THIS "RIF"
why does the catalyst 4000 not support isl?
Craig E. Smith
Network Engineer
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
talk about preaching.
take some of you own advice.
I always "enjoy" posts that say "if you reply to my silly post you prove my
point about silly posts"
or
"listen to my opinion but don't tell me yours"
yep always a pleasure.
Kevin Wigle
p.s.
you guys knew I would respond didn't you
talk about preaching.
take some of you own advice.
I always "enjoy" posts that say "if you reply to my silly post you prove my
point about silly posts"
or
"listen to my opinion but don't tell me yours"
yep always a pleasure.
Kevin Wigle
p.s.
you guys knew I would respond didn't you
>Actually its done on butterfly ballots, then machine counted, then hand
>counted, then hand counted again, this time looking for dimples. Next the
>court orders another examination of your answer sheet, this time with the
>purpose of divining how you intended to answer on all those questions you
It does on it's Gigabit Ethernet Ports.
Ole
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
RWR Enterprises, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp
NEED A JOB ???
http://www.oledrews.com/job
GEEZ Leonrelax. Its ok to go off on tangents every so often.
- Original Message -
From: "NP-BASS LEON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:23 AM
Subject: THIS IS A CISCO STUDY GROUP
> I have used this study group for a while now and I think s
The book was ok, but I thought the Cisco Certified Design Associate Study
Guide by Todd Lamle provided more detail and provided an easier to read
format. The Boson test are VERY helpful also. A few suggestions:
don't get flustered by the Case Studies (some of them are not written very
well or c
I agree that a certain amount of comparison is warranted. However,
when it comes to arguments about who is better, I think it's benefit
is unfounded.
As always, just an opinion. :)
Roman
-Original Message-
From: Raul F. Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 20
You might be better off using the $4000 for four attempts at the lab!
>From: "Bruce Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Bruce Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BRS, ECP1, ACCP CCIE Practice Labs
>Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:16:37 -0500
>
>Hello all,
>
>I am prepa
We do both. The only problem with ADSL is the distance limit. It is
still a little flakey and even carriers will tell you not to bank your
business on it. Its dependability has improved greatly in a year but
still lacks a little. All in all it seems to work fairly well for our
remote clients and
Here is my situation
building-01-b=
utah-01
-ROUTERROUTER--ROUTER--
ethernet ethernet frame =
ethernet
I need to bridge tr
I don't have L2TP configured. Here is my situation
building-01-butah-01
---ROUTERROUTER--ROUTER--
ethernetethernet frame ethernet
I need to bridge traffic from building-
I agree, Leon should relax a little. Sure, this is a Cisco certification
study group by name, but it has evolved to be more than that. This is
natural considering the number of list members who have developed
relationships with each other. We all know the regulars, and sometimes we
go off on ta
My employer has sold a number of these kinds of solutions.
Keep in mind that data flow drives your bandwidth decisions. If your data
flow will not be disrupted or impaired by the asymmetric nature of DSL, then
go for it.
One solution that I have come to believe is quite suitable for any number o
Also, remember - this group has had a slight design change. The group is
now a combination of two groups, Professional and Tech. The Tech group may
discuss any issue related to network engineering, not just Cisco products.
Please read http://www.groupstudy.com/lists/cisco.html and
http://www.g
I use to watch Days of Our Lives but,
this mail list is better :-)
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I cant believe all you people have got the time to write these emails about
this crap.
You obviously need more work to do.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Neiberger [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 December 2000 16:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: THIS IS A CISCO ST
Quick question...what is going to prevent this study group from potentially
turning into a sales forum? With the anonymity that the Internet provides
for all I know the advice I get could come from a sales rep?
Brian Roe (GS-11)
TDC ICAP Deployable Systems/Tactical Networks
12 AF AFETS
5280 E
Don't tell me The new youngest CCIE, right?
Matthew
Phil Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com
12/10/2000 09:59 AM
Please respond to Phil Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco GroupStudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Off Topic: Ryan says Mer
Yes indeed-I have been trying to make this point for about a month, and I
have no patience for you imbecills that take up our precious
study/troubleshooting time with your incessant beckoring.
Roy
-Original Message-
From: Raul F. Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, Decembe
Hey Group!
Off topic rants aside... :-)
I just want to thank Paul and associates for the upgrade and new location of
the lists' server.
When I replied earlier today to an OT post, I expected to see my post 3-4
hours later as was normal just a few days ago.
Very much surprised and pleas
It has already begun it seems. "I work for Cisco", "I work for Juniper",
"we are better, hands down". Technical comparisons are great because that
benefits us all. General statements about which company is doing better or
opinions about who's product is better don't. I love interoperability po
Rick,
I'm sure you know, but there are different levels of service level
agreements. The ILEC (bell guys) have one and the DSL providers (clec) have
another. In our situation, our clec (our DSL provider) has a 4 hour mean
time to repair (MTR). (they are currently running at 6 hours for repai
Greetings all,
Is there any disadvantages for using ospf virtual links? What kind of impact
does it have on the router?.
Thanks,
Nabil
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure viol
Well brian if I ask a question about access lists and I get a reply about
buying a Cat 65xx can I borrow 50 grand.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Roe Brian M Civ 612 ACOMS/AFETS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:12 AM
Subject: RE: THIS IS A CISC
Has anyone had issues where DHCP limited the use of the Spanning tree =
protocol?
Can you send me a lead to a white paper or give me any information on =
this issue?
Thanks.
A. Ward
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisc
Yes...much, much faster! Many thanks to all involved.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 10:25 AM
To: cisco
Subject: OT: More bandwidth
Hey Group!
Off topic rants aside... :-)
I just want to thank Paul and associates
-
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECT
To each his/her own. I'm following the talk about Cisco's competitors with
interest. My company recently lost a couple of its CCIEs to Juniper; no
doubt other present and wannabe CCIEs will "defect" to the competition.
Second, on technical grounds, I've gained a better appreciation of Cisco's
prod
Let me waste some of this bandwitdh by joining Kevin in thanking Paul and
everyone who has helped him keeping this list running and making it even
better.
This list has indeed helped me getting where I am now (halfway CCNP), so I
would like to make a suggestion to help Paul (and everyone who has
Hello,
This isn't really Certification related but it is a cool *free* toy
I just setup. Multi Router Traffic Grapher(MRTG) and here is the url
http://mrtg.hdl.com/mrtg.html
I just set it up for our links to the Internet and it's pretty cool. The
site above has some sample graphs.
Tha
Limiting it how? Give us more information if you don't mind. Are you
running into a specific problem?
-Original Message-
From: A. Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DHCP Spanning Tree
Has anyone had issues where DHCP
OSPF virtual link should be used as temporary solution and should not be
part of any internetwork design. The reason for that is complexity of
troubleshooting virtual links. A permanent virtual link is a sign of poorly
designed internetwork.
No real impact in the router performance.
-Origina
Sure, if I can sell it to you
Brian Roe (GS-11)
TDC ICAP Deployable Systems/Tactical Networks
12 AF AFETS
5280 E Gafford Way (Bldg.72) Suite 111
Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707
Ph:520-228-2028 Fax:520-228-4384
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I don't know about the rest of you, but I got REAL
good at using the 'delete' button after joining the
group.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
___
Jon,
Thanx for replying. I have only got one switch in this set up do you reckon
that would work if I split it into 2 Vlans?
Bola
>From: "Jon Tucker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Wannabe CCIE'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Cisco Local Director Help!!
>Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:27:30 -0500
Hi,
How do I upgrade the IOS on my 2501 via the console? I have upgraded the IOS on
the 2600's and 3600's via the console with no problem but on a 2501 when I type xmodem
-c the 2501 prompts a what?
Can someone please advise?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMA
They all have a product to sell and "their" product IS ALWAYS the best
product. Of course, the bigger margin they make the better - after all, it
is nice to get those bonus checks.
What so many fail to see is that different products may be better than each
other for different situations. Qu
If you have the Local Director outside interface on one vlan and the
inside interface on another (servers plugged into the same one), there
is no problem at all. The local director will direct the traffic from
the outside vlan to the inside vlan that the servers reside on.
Roman
-Original M
I have been pretty aggressive about keeping sales off the list. If someone
abuses the list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it will be taken
care of.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Roe Brian M Civ 612 ACOMS/AFETS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am working on a token ring to Ethernet upgrade 2000 users. I would =
like to know if anybody out there has preformed this type of conversion =
before and what where the main issues. I know that MTU. and =
Fragmentation will be a major concern. My feeling on this is that once =
the servers
Well I wrote the CID Beta exam earlier today and damn was it crap.My exam
said Cisco Secure VPN on the top.It seemed like it was a test that was made
up of alot of different tests.I did'nt know that Voice and VPN and numerous
other non related design topics were part of the new CID.I used the S
I took it a few days back. I didn't study for it much.
I just finished the CCIE written a month or so ago and I relied on much of
the study from that, as well as the fact that I am a Network Designer all
day long...
It was very strange indeed but I was pleased with it, I think I may even
pass it
is very hard to get your hands on a Juniper router... they are selling like hotcakes.
I guess you get what you pay for.
and did you hear the latest news, Cisco's lead on their MPLS design no longer works
for Cisco. Guess who he works for now? You're right, Yakov Rekhter now works for
Junip
The local director is a bridge - so the frames will be bridged to the
front vlan.
just don't have a routed interface in the backend vlan for those
load-balanced devices to use as a default route.
Also, you can not have devices in back of the LD connect to VIP (virtual
IP's in front) If you need
Fast switching definitely has the problem you refer to. Fast switching
offers per-destination load-sharing. Since the router caches information on
how to forward traffic to a destination, all traffic to that destination
exits the same interface.
One of the goals of CEF was to overcome this pro
Thank-you Paul, Cory, and Lon. You offer a terrific service, Paul.
Priscilla
At 10:39 PM 12/14/00, Paul Borghese wrote:
>Two of our list members, Cory Williams and Lon Cameron have arranged for
>GroupStudy to be co-located at InFlow Inc (www.inflow.com). Our previous
>co-location facility was u
Should work just fine.
- Jon
-Original Message-
From: Wannabe CCIE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Local Director Help!!
Jon,
Thanx for replying. I have only got one switch in this set up do you reckon
that
Hi all,
Thanks for the responses, but are you not talking about layer 3?
During calls I have no problems. A call with interesting traffic will stay
up for hours. It is during periods of no calls that the layer 2 seems to go
to sleep, so no matter whether the router sees it as interesting traffic
I took it this morning. I was happy with it. I only got 1 question that
was really bad but for the most part I thought it was almost too easy. It
was just very very broad range of coverage from VPN, VOICE, to OSPF & EIGRP.
Many topics. 184 questions to sit through is a killer too. I am prett
Hello all,
Question for you, does Cisco support TCP Rate Control or TCP Flow Control?
MGR
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I comment from an engineer i work with was that the test was not much
different from the IE written.
184 questions 3 hrs 6-8 weeks to find out results Brutal
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Shane Stockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 6:45 PM
S
Gareth,
Did you get my original response regarding checking
'show isdn stat' when it "goes to sleep"?
Paste the output from that when it is "sleeping".
Also, check with the ISDN provider and have them look
at their switch to see what they see when it is
"sleeping".
If you have a extra router
Hi
Is there a way of redistributing a number of static routes into eigrp,
whilst altering the cost of just one of them
I thought i'd be able to do it with a route-map statement but i'm having a
bit of trouble getting it to work
Any help would be grateful
Thanks
-Paul
PLEASE READ: The informati
Well, it is a Beta exam. They offer it so they can work out the bugs (like
the wrong title and a lack of actual design questions &;-) Did you
hopefully give them lots of feedback? That's what they need.
Also, don't blame the books. Most authors don't have a way of knowing what
is going to be o
And don't forget that your answers to the survey affect your score! &;-)
That sounds about as smart as the Florida thing.
Seriously, I've been trying to get an answer to the question about whether
the survey really affects your score. (I apologize for bringing up this
annoying subject again.)
At 10:17 AM 12/15/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is very hard to get your hands on a Juniper router... they are selling
> like hotcakes.
And how about Juniper stock!? &;-)
>I guess you get what you pay for.
>and did you hear the latest news, Cisco's lead on their MPLS design no
>longer works
Hi,
I have my management station behind the PIX and the TFTP server is running
on that machine. I am not able to do a TFTP of the config-file of the router
which is connected to internet. I can do so for the PIX.
I have a static mapping for the mgmt station to have a valid ip address. I
also can
Well, you probably don't have the correct UDP port open for TFTP to come
into the network from the router. Open UDP port 63 (I think) from the
outside to the inside interface for TFTP from the router to the mgmt
station. Do this with the following:
conduit permit udp x.x.x.x 255.255.255.255 eq
You might want to allow traffic through your PIX for port 69 (TFTP) and 23
(TELNET).
Hth,
Ole
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
RWR Enterprises, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp
~~
Umm...
Are you allowing Telnet (port 23) and TFTP (port 69) from your mgmt
workstation through the PIX???
Z
>From: Vasudeva Venkateshaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Vasudeva Venkateshaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: TFTP from inside..
>Date
Cisco recommends not using conduits and statics.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rik Guyler
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 3:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vasudeva Venkateshaiah
Subject: RE: TFTP from inside..
Well, you probably
Hi...
I do have the following conduit statements in the config..
conduit permit tcp host x.x.x.x eq 69 host y.y.y.y
conduit permit udp host x.x.x.x eq tftp host y.y.y.y
Where x.x.x.x represents the outside address of the mgmt station (the
registered address) and y.y.y.y represents the inside in
Has the list been down or just something on my system? I haven't received
email for 2 days but all of a sudden...it's back!?!
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [
Hi Erick,
Sorry, didn't get your original response until just now. Too many different
e-mail accounts.
Good advice though.
To be honest with this one I was being nosey, with a job one of our other
engineers was working on, where the outcome, due to a similar previous was
to advise customer to spe
Am I correct?
Can't this be handled by the:
"isdn tei negotiation powerup" config command?
OR setting it for tei first-call? I thought I read
that power-up negotiation is set by default on cisco
boxes.
Thanks.
--- "Erick B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gareth,
>
> Did you get my original
We really own an immense thanks to Cory Williams and Lon Cameron. They got
us the bandwidth and will be managing the hardware whenever there is a
problem.
I like you idea of a shared lab we can use for a minimal contribution. I
actually have some equipment we can use. Just the problem is writ
A good way of trouble shooting is always to try different things even though
they might not seem logical as a solution. When it works, you can always sit
down an figure out why what did worked, and fine polish your configuration.
First of all, I would try to use the inside address of the mgmt st.
Hello Everybody
I need to know that can i find case study diagrams on
the internet somewhere for the Designing Cisco
Networks book by Diane Teare.
Ill be grateful to u guys.
Shahid
=
Shahid Muhammad Shafi
MSc Telecommunications Candidate
University of Colorado Boulder
BSEE(GIKI),MCSE+I,CNA,CC
What do they recommend as an alternative?
""Mark Krysinski"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Cisco recommends not using conduits and statics.
>
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O
me neither...
Also been looking.
Anyone seen anything lately
-Original Message-
From: Will Bober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Where did the free book offers go? [1:1213]
Anyone see any free book offers from Cis
Hi all,
I am about to embark on my studying for the switching exam
(taking remote access 12/18).My question is,which book is the best
for this exam.I have seen 2 on the ciscopress site.
Thanks for the advise
Tim
_
Get your FREE downl
Dear friends,
Any one can help me to clearify the concept of VTP?
It's Virtual Trunking Protocol? Or VLAN trunking
Protocol? Or the two are actually same.
VTP support 3 modes: Server, Client, and
Transparent.What does Transparent mean?
Thanks and Merry Christmas!
Snow
___
Sometimes I answer questions to try to bring out the experts, not because I
am an expert. &;-) But so far nobody has added to my comments about CEF, so
I will.
From my additional reading on the topic, I think it's not quite right to
say that one of the goals of CEF was to overcome the per-des
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
