Newbie question,
Re: 2500 series routers
Is it true that any 72 pin DRAM Simm (eg.16mb) will work in these routers
for the primary memory? Does it matter about the speed of the ram (60ns/70ns)?
What is the largest size of ram that the router will take and still deliver
a speed benefit? Assuming
hi all
anyone knows why if a router needs to be configured
with the frame-relay switching command even though it
is not configured as a frame-relay switch?
regards,
suaveguru
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great
From what I know you could configure BACK TO BACK
FRAME-RELAY WITH two routers with LMI turn off
regards,
Jason Yee
--- Fischer Reinhold wrote:
Hi Thomas,
i think it is not possible what you are trying to
accomplish.
You need one Router with at least two serial
interfaces dedicated
On Mon, 28 May 2001, NetEng wrote:
I continously get this error after booting (about every 60s)
%Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/network-confg (Timed out)
%Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/cisconet.cfg (Timed out)
%Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/2600router-confg (Timed out)
Hi,
My friend has a question on the Cisco 4000 switch, can
anyone please help? Thanks in advance.
==
When a Cisco 1720 is hookup to the switch, if there is
no traffice from the 1720, it will be disconnected
from the Cisco catalyte 4000 switch after a preset 300
seconds.
The mac-address of
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Dean wrote:
Dear Group,
Security issues come over to me in a certain case of mine:
how to prevent an ISP and IDC from being attacked by DDoS?
ACL CAR in exit routers may be bringing some impack on performance?
Firewall may be having some throughput problem?
Any
Hi,
You need frame-relay switching command in order to enter the command
frame-relay intf-type dce to make a serial interface appear as a dce
interface to frame relay.
Howard Choi
CCNP, CCDP
--
From: suaveguru
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame-Relay Switching command [7:6188]
Date:
On Tue, 29 May 2001, NRF wrote:
I got this weird situation here:
I got router A that dials into router B through an analog modem (async
lines). On both routers A and B, I am using dialer profiles with
rotary-groups. B is also connected to the Internet, through E0 (to a cable
modem), and
well said.
look through the command service ?
-Original Message-
From: ElephantChild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 May 2001 09:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: After boot error [7:6152]
On Mon, 28 May 2001, NetEng wrote:
I continously get this error after booting
When I try to ping, the modem dials, and the async int comes up, etc. So
everything seems to behave normally when I ping. It just doesn't receive
any echo replies.
I even debug ip packet on router B (the dial up server), and I see that
packets to yahoo are indeed being forwarded correctly.
I am curious to know if anybody out there really uses ISP-driven mandatory
VPDN's. By that, I don't mean the client-driven PPTP/L2TP tunnel for the
roving salesmen to dial back into the office network, as I am well aware
that this is quite popular. What I am talking about is the ISP-provided
Make sure the devices knows how to get back to the next hop ; (ie static
route back to the network you're sitting in)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6199t=6057
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I have TWO routers with TR interface - 2502/2504. I am using IBM MAU.
Connected both the routers TR int to MAU port 1 2. Router 2504 TR Int is
up and running fine. I am having problem with 2502. There is no fault on
MAU. What else could be the problem? I even changed ring speed on 2502.
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
Subject: Re: Does MPLS really live up to all its hype? [7:6151]
MPLS complements IP routing. Neither replaces the other. There
might have been some arguments in that area when (my mind
blanks--they were acquired by Nokia) introduced the first label
switching
KY wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
No.
Ms.Radia's comments were absolutely correct at the time of her writing,
she
just could not say anything that had not happened while she wrote the
book.
Tag switching and other proprietary similar technologies, on which MPLS
No Way!!!
The Marketing people NEVER exagerate.:-
MPLS does seem like a solution to a problem that was fixed some time
ago...ie: fast-switching, CEF etc...
DaveC
NRF wrote:
Mr. Berkowitz, please read this post and respond.
Okay, I am going to run the risk of starting a
1. Swap the cables between the 2502 and 2504 (if you haven't already)
2. Swap the ports on the MAU.
If 1 and 2 do not work get rid of the 2502.
Even Cisco's hardware breaks.
HTH
DaveC
RamG wrote:
I have TWO routers with TR interface - 2502/2504. I am using IBM MAU.
Connected both the
Dennis and anyone else.
I am also in Chicago and studying for the ccnp. I have a lot of Cisco study
books and CDs. I am interested in study partners. If anyone is interested
please e-mail me.
Thanks, Jerry
From: Dennis R
Reply-To: Dennis R
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Chicago Group
Hi all,
I have client want to connect two Branch offices using DDR and
access a netbios based program form one branch to the server
on the other branch. They got one 801 and 803 with ip only IOS.
The DDR is configured with IP and the routers are getting
connected over ISDN. Now the netbios
On Tue, 29 May 2001, NRF wrote:
When I try to ping, the modem dials, and the async int comes up, etc. So
everything seems to behave normally when I ping. It just doesn't receive
any echo replies.
I even debug ip packet on router B (the dial up server), and I see that
packets to yahoo
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
Subject: Re: Does MPLS really live up to all its hype? [7:6151]
MPLS complements IP routing. Neither replaces the other. There
might have been some arguments in that area when (my mind
blanks--they were acquired by Nokia) introduced the first label
switching
Hi Jason,
The show version says 4.0.7
Apparently I have 8 meg of RAM from the bootup sequence:
Flash=i28F020
Reading floppy image...
Flash version 4.0.7, Floppy version 4.0.7
Do you want me to install floppy version onto flash? [n]
loading from flash...
8MB
Hi,
I was just reviewing the Exam Blueprint for CCNP Switching 2.0 and I noticed
that it included Atm Lane. The BCMSN course doesn't cover LANE, and it's
also skipped by the Sybex and Coriolis Books. Can anyone tell me if the
exam blueprint is accurate, or if this is a bit of misinformation
All who thought about it and replied-
Thanks for all the help, that fixed it.
NetEng wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I continously get this error after booting (about every 60s)
%Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/network-confg (Timed out)
%Error opening
Hi
I have to 1601 Routers in 2 branch offices connecting them to a 3640 router
in a Central office over ATM. I have configured EIGRP routing and the
encapsulation is ATM-dxi.
The is that, both of the branch offices have connectivity to the central
sites and have no problems with the central
I am not sure if 4.44 showed the activation key in show ver.
I don't think the Pix will run if it didn't have an activation key.
- Original Message -
From: Jtnatas Amorim
To:
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:32 PM
Subject: PIX FIREWALL UPGRADE [7:5976]
I'd be grateful if someone could
type-code 16-bit hexadecimal number written with a leading 0x; for
example, 0x6000. You can specify either an Ethernet type code for
Ethernet-encapsulated packets, or a DSAP/SSAP pair for 802.3 or
802.5-encapsulated packets. Ethernet type codes are listed in the appendix
Ethernet Type Codes.
routerArouterB
AREA0AREA0
||
routerC routerD
AREA1-AREA1
Since we are on the topic of OSPF, could someone help me out on the scenario
above?
Routers A and B
This is just the normal Cisco arp timeout for its routers and switches.
Their is nothing wrong with aging out the arp entries at 300. Its not
like being disconnected..he can still source and receive traffic
Brian
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Joseph Cheng wrote:
Hi,
My friend has a question on
If you mean the switching (BCMSN) exam, the only reference that i found for
LANE was in the trunking protocols... In the study guide, there is a table
mentioning the different protocols (isl, 802.1Q, 802.10 and, of course
LANE).
But i doubt one is supposed to know how LANE works.
--
Charles
There's a really long--but excellent--thread on this topic from a few
months ago. Start searching through the archives beginning in January
and see if you can find it. Actually, there were two different threads
around then but one of them is really good. I believe it's called
Another 802.3
ok also bieng stupid again
is DXI setup on both SUB-ints on the 36`s this is a point-to-point serail
encap you need to either frame-relay map OR use inverse arp to get this
2 worki think...
( i recon i will get flamed to friday because i am giving wrong advise ,but
hey no
Place a summary route to null 0 for the networks on Router D on your OSPF
routers and set the metrics appropriately for the summary route
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kevin Schwantz
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:03 AM
To: [EMAIL
You could use policy routing and set the next hop from router a to router d
to go through router c for the appropriate destination network.. I wouldn't
use a tunnel.. lot of overhead for something trivial. You could also use a
static route.. good old static routes.
Cory
-Original
When you swap to frame relay, do you use map statements art the branch
offices?
BTW, I wasn't aware that the 16xx series supported ATM, can't verify this on
the IOS feature navigator found at:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/FeatureNav/FN.pl
which IOS version you running? I have a couple
ok also bieng stupid again
is DXI setup on both SUB-ints on the 36`s this is a point-to-point serail
encap you need to either frame-relay map OR use inverse arp to get this
2 worki think...
( i recon i will get flamed to friday because i am giving wrong advise ,but
hey no
Sounds like a split horizon problem. Split horizon is disabled on
frame-relay physical interfaces as well as multipoint subinterfaces. I
believe that the same is true with ATM, but I have never specifically
verified that.
Need more info to confirm.
Please post the configs of the ATM setup.
Today I passed BCRAN. I got a low mark of 785 which 706 for pass.
I use the Sybex book and found there is quite something the book not
covered. There is nothing more material than CCO.
Is there any good recommandation for CCIE written? Is Sybex books good?
Thanks!
Message Posted at:
Run BGP on all routers and manipulate the path with local preference or
weights or meds?
Static routes?
Change to EIGRP?
Disconnect the link from A to C?
Put router B into area 1?
Sure - a tunnel will work also
Sorry, I've been reading too many things this weekend.
Chuck
-Original
I am testing MLS on a cat5500 and have not been able to demonstrate any
throughput improvement using FTP as a test application. The cat5500 has
SupIII (4.5.12), RSM (12.0.7T) with NFFCII and 3 24port 10/100 ethernet line
cards. I have 7 Vlans configured and the mls settings on both the RSM and
well, since C and D are in the same area they have the tame topology DB.
they KNOW the best route to each other and are going to use it.
the tunnel idea is kinda stupid.
first let me ask why you would want traffic between two directly connected
routers to NOT use that link?
...But anyway, i
frame relay his inverse arp, if the admin is lazy, atm-dxi needs map
statements (sometimes), which im guessing you havent made =P
there is a possibility that i am speaking out of my ass on this one.
-Peter Slow CCNP
- Original Message -
From: Hamid
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:47
A collegue of mine wrote an article some time back entitled MPLS: Desert
Toping or Floor Wax
MPLS originally was created to solve the problem of slow, software-based
routers. Hardware-based (aka Layer 3 switches) routers alleviated that
requirement. Since then MPLS is being used for all sorts
IIRC, OSPF works on the basis of path cost. To make the router Prefer a
path, you
A. Raise the cost of the bad link above the good link
or
B. Lower the cost of the good link below the bad link
From CCO, I see that
---Begin quote from
It is now official. My switching exam is scheduled for tuesday the 12th at
9:00.
I have absolutely no idea why I am posting this, except to help pacify my
nerves maybe???
Jennifer Cribbs
(the one who is driving her husband nuts right now)
Have a great day!
Jenn
Message Posted at:
... or route-map the router D network(s) to go through Router B at Router A
- Original Message -
From: Chris Larson
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:24 AM
Subject: RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076]
Place a summary route to null 0 for the networks on Router D on your OSPF
Reverse telnet allows you to connect a modem or any serial device to the AUX
port or Async port of a Router and telnet to the modem or serial device. An
example of this in real life is... If a company has branch offices with a
Catalyst 2924XL switch and a 2620 router. You can connect the 2924
next time you recomend using bgp to fix an IGP problem, im going to.., well,
uh, just dont do it again.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:38 AM
Subject: RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076]
Run BGP on all routers and manipulate the
Yes, you can connect them together with a t1 crossover cable. To make your
own cable, Cross 1-4 and 2-5..
Good Luck,
Ejay Hire
... Answers are free. Explanations will cost you a Diet Pepsi.
-Original Message-
From: Malik Muhammad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May
Thanks for the recommendations. Firstly, let me explain why I need the
routing to behave in such a way. The reasons are purely geographical and I
want to reduce latency. Routers A and B are in London and connected back to
back via FastEth. Routers C and D are in and SanJose and NewYork
of those functions already has an established (and often better)
solution. Would any vendor be recommending MPLS if it did not require
an upgrade? $
I vote:Floor Wax :-
PS: Where can I find the article?
DaveC
Irwin Lazar wrote:
A collegue of mine wrote an article some
Peter,
Thanks for your input. I hope my description of the geographical topology in
another post should point out why I want my traffic to route in the manner I
have described. Taking down the link between C and D is not an option. You
mentioned Virtual links. I always thought they were used to
IIRC, on some platforms deleted subinterfaces don't disappear until a
reload.
Ejay Hire
-Original Message-
From: Arun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 3:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Serial1/3.1 is deleted, line protocol is down [7:6090]
Hi
let me
Have you tried an inboud distribution list on Router A's area 1
interfaces. If router A doesn't learn the Router D routes thru those
interfaces it should then use Area 0.
Worth a try.
DaveC
Kevin Schwantz wrote:
Thanks for the recommendations. Firstly, let me explain why I need the
I've seen this problem when a port on the MAU needed to be reset. Or when
the ring speed is set incorrectly. To reset the port on the MAU, they sent
me a handy little tool that fit into the MAU port and a little red light
blinked on it when it was done. I've lost it now, does anybody know
I'll try again...
Yes: It is/can be used for all types of different functions. BUT each
of those functions already has an established (and often better)
solution. Would any vendor be recommending MPLS if it did not require
an upgrade? $
I vote:Floor Wax :-
PS: Where can I
Wouldn't you still like the route to D to be available through C if the link
between B and D goes down, or if router B goes down? A distribution list
would stop that.
--
James Haynes
Network Architect
Cendant IT
A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP
David Chandler wrote in message
[EMAIL
Thats a good point James. Distribution lists are too restrictive and not
very scalable in this situation. I think my first course of action would be
to tweak the OSPF cost between A and C so that traffic from A to D will go
via B instead of C. My only concern is that I might create the situation
On a related subject that Howard brought up regarding GMPLS what does
everyone think of Cisco's decision to dump the 15900 Wavelength Router? It
was slated to be one of the first commercial Multi Protocol Lambda Switching
boxes using SRP however, on April 4th it suddenly dissappeared from
Okay, based on all of the information, we can come up with a solution.
Scenario:
4 routers connected in a ring by various speed links
Objectives:
Router A's traffic for Router C should be sent directly to C
Router B's traffic for Router D should be sent directly to D
Router A's Traffic for B or
Just upgrade one version at a time. I believe the next upgrade is the one
that starts showing the activation keys. You can do one upgrade, get the
key, then go to the version you want, OR just keep going one version at a
time. Either way works but you need to get the key by upgrading one
Peter,
With all due respect, he doesn't have an IGP problem... He has a
routing problem, and would like the ability to influence the flow of
traffic under certain circumstances to provide for better network
performance.
After hearing a better explanation of the real issue, path selection
for
WIC2T + Serial WIC + Voice 2V
Problem: Router cannot see its interfaces (hardware)
show interfaces- received none
show version - received none in hardware section
After router booted we received:
00:00:04: %PA-2-UNDEFPA: Undefined Port Adaptor type 0
in bay 0
00:00:04: %PA-2-UNDEFPA:
Absolutely, but he has traffic going from one router to another, it's not
ever exiting the system.
...why would you want to break up an AS that small into two seperate private
ASes?
besides... the OSPF routes are going to take precedence, not that the admin
dist. cant be changed, but ospf is 120,
On a related subject that Howard brought up regarding GMPLS what does
everyone think of Cisco's decision to dump the 15900 Wavelength Router? It
was slated to be one of the first commercial Multi Protocol Lambda Switching
boxes using SRP however, on April 4th it suddenly dissappeared from
Or use a route-map to increase the path cost...
Otherwise you lose that filtered path as a backup route...
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th Street
New York, NY
10001
Cell:(516) 782.1535
Desk: (646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax:
Not sure about all logical interface but ATM subintf., vaccess intf, serial
subintf, all are calculated as SWIDBs which never gets cleaned internally
when deleted or removed by netadmin till it gets reloaded. Verify with show
idb cli..
thanks,
rahul.
- Original Message -
From: Hire,
Hey he could use MPLS to do traffic engineering, actually.
What kind of routers are these?
=P
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th Street
New York, NY
10001
Cell:(516) 782.1535
Desk: (646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax:(646) 792.2396
Im thinking that route maps which increase the path cost might be your best
bet.
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th Street
New York, NY
10001
Cell:(516) 782.1535
Desk: (646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax:(646) 792.2396
-
WOOPS. Due to me being a jackass. I have been looking at your diagram
incorrectly.
I would think that if OSPF is configured properly, this will already be the
case.
Can i see your routing tables, please?
preferably from all four routers.
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
I guess I do fit into that catagory.and..
Thanks for the support Chuck.
Will post results after test...I better get that ear cotton ready for the
long
drive to the testing site.
Jenn
= Original Message From Chuck Larrieu =
You silly, wives drive their husbands nuts all the
Voice 2V module require IOS 12.0.7T or high.
Which IOS release you use?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6260t=6251
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
Peter,
OSPF has a distance of 110, and yes, iBGP has a distance of 200. By
having seperate routing domains for North America and Europe, he could
use eBGP (Distance - 20) between his two networks.
Distance wouldn't really do anything in this case, though, because
European routes would not be
What about the fact that OSPF will install an Intra-area route over
and Inter-area route regardless of cost?
:)
- Original Message -
From: Hire, Ejay
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:46 PM
Subject: RE: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076]
Okay, based on all of the information,
I've been looking at the route-maps as well.
Question:
How can the route-map matches tell the difference between the routes
arriving via area 0 and those from area 1. To set the cost of just
those learned from area 1 it would have to be able to tell the
difference.
If you match the RD
No, OSPF is 110. And BGP has 2 ADs. One for IBGP (200) and one for EBGP (20)
Christopher A. Kane, CCNP
Senior Network Control Tech
Router Ops Center/Hilliard NOC
UUNET
(614)723-7877
-Original Message-
From: Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
I don`t mean to be the dunce... here but .
why not (and don`t flame me please...)
if you use the ip ospf cost command on the interface you ARE going to
manipulate all traffic
this is going to cause you probs with A-C
IT`s a Doozy kev..i very much wish to find out how your
The IOS you are using is probably not supporting this hardware.
hth
Reinhold
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Sergey Konovalov wrote:
WIC2T + Serial WIC + Voice 2V
Problem: Router cannot see its interfaces (hardware)
show interfaces- received none
show version - received none in hardware
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th Street
New York, NY
10001
Cell:(516) 782.1535
Desk: (646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax:(646) 792.2396
- Original Message -
From: W. Alan Robertson
To: Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
what model router?
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th Street
New York, NY
10001
Cell:(516) 782.1535
Desk: (646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax:(646) 792.2396
- Original Message -
From: Reinhold Fischer
To:
Sent: Tuesday,
you're correct *only* if you're dealing with INTRA-AREA routes. Read up on
OSPF again and look at the order of precedence for OSPF route selection,
especially around routes provided by ABRs.
-e-
- Original Message -
From: Hire, Ejay
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:09 AM
Subject:
ALL RIGHT, LOOK! The OSPF domain probably isn't big enough to demand
multiple areas anyway, so just put ALL 4 of the routers in AREA 0, make the
matching costs of the common interfaces on RTR A and RTR B lower, and be
done with it!
;-)
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:52 AM
Subject: Re:
I have not yet begun to tizzy! ;)
- Original Message -
From: Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
To: W. Alan Robertson ;
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076]
...don't get all in a tizzy, i recognize that you have a good idea.
I
I am a great fan of using separate OSPF domains, with the area
0.0.0.0's linked by a backbone of backbones. Most commonly, that
backbone will use BGP, for exactly the reasons of control that Alan
Robertson points out. I have had success, in specific networks, of
building that backbone with
Couple thoughts on this. Cisco's OSPF should prefer intra area routes over
inter unless the administrative distances are modified. By default, as many
have mentioned, they are all set to 110. However, internally, I believe
path cost is the 2nd tie break, with intra beating inter as the first.
As Alan correctly points out, path cost is irrelevant in this case as intra
area routers will be preferred over inter.
We
tend to think that a small network could not be better served by
applying the same principles that we might use for a larger
environment. Why is that? Instead of
Thanks for the insight!I'm aware of how to use the aux port to
connect modems. I'm using that scenario with 2 external modems and a
teltone POTS simulator to do DDR. Works pretty good.
Tim
On 29 May 2001 11:22:31 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hire, Ejay)
wrote:
Reverse telnet allows you to
Ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark-ark
I neglected to type in step 1, move everything to Area 0...
Just when I think I've got one right,
ark-ark-ark
Ejay Hire
-Original Message-
From: EA Louie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:38 PM
To:
IPv4 and IPv6 use the Ethernet II frame format. Some server and desktop OSs
support changing the frame format to 802.3, although there's no reason to
do this usually. In the past, some OSs defaulted to 802.3. But most
implementations these days use Ethernet II.
If a Cisco IOS router receives
I've used a GRE tunnel to get multicast traffic through a PIX.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6279t=6155
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
I was wondering if anyone is wanting to change a lab date in the near future
for the RTP Routing and Switching Lab. I have a lab date for the 1/24/02
and don't want to wait that long. I was also wondering if anyone has
figured out how to put your name on the waiting list via the web. I have
Here is my dilemma. I need to implement a very reliable (and of course cost
efficient) RAS solution (currently using NT, no flames please) and here's
what I'm looking at.
Cisco 2509- I currently have 8 analog line coming from our PBX into our
existing RAS solution. Here's my first question and
I've recently come across the debate with one of our customers over the
below approach, versus using just an OSPF backbone. Their engineers are
pushing for the BGP approach, I'm trying to understand the benefits. This
message helps a lot!
Couple of questions though:
Is it possible to provision
As I am with Lucent, who is also an active player and competitor of Nortel,
in the optical arena:
http://www.lucent.com/press/0501/010515.nsb.html
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On a related subject that Howard brought up regarding GMPLS
Please disregard the second question. I see that I must use a 3620. Anyone
out there using it? How's it working? Thanks again.
Collin
NetEng wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Here is my dilemma. I need to implement a very reliable (and of course
cost
efficient)
Not any memory, but memory that meets all the specs. I don't know for sure
what all the specs are (someone told me it was parity memory). The 2500 wil
do max of 16M. I dug through my parts box and started plugging in memory
untill I found a 16M that worked. It makes sense that Cisco wouldn't
I need a set of rack mounts for one of my Cisco 2500's for my lab rack.
Anyone know a cheap place to buy them?
Eugene
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6286t=6286
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Anyone know if there's a forum such as IRC, ICQ where we engineers can have
techy talks. Thanks.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Message Posted at:
They are a regular feature on eBay. Search on Cisco +rack.
Some while ago I bought several pair from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good price fast
delivery.
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2500
Sorry, I don't. But aren't most filtering IRC/ICQ default ports (6664, 6665,
7000. etc...) at the front door anyway?? Maybe it's the organization I work
for that makes me think that way?Just thinking out loud...
Roger
-Original Message-
From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
