Sorry, WAY too expensive!
-Original Message-
From: Chopman David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: About CCNP [7:44116]
Hi All:
Info4Cert.com, IT certification guaranteed study guides provider, is
offering free study guides
Hi..
i am facing this problem that i am not able to figure out what's causing it.
from the central 2600 series there is another 2600 router and from this one
the branch office connected by an 805 router. let me call these locations as
A, B and C respectively. The speeds of the links connecting
John,
thanks for the feedback.
So PC2 doesn't have a default gateway configured and will send a broadcast
for the address of PC1. Since router B is on the same subnet and knows
where PC1 is, shouldn't it respond as a proxy?
-H
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
To:
Sent:
This is what I have
User Access Verification
Password:
MC-2916XL-56460en
Password:
MC-2916XL-56460#show version
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C2900XL Software (C2900XL-H-M), Version 11.2(8)SA, RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc
1)
Copyright (c) 1986-1997 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Hi All,
Just some basic questions...
Currently my IDS 4210 is setup to block and do a TCP reset when I get hit
with WWW WinNT cmd.exe Access. What else can I do to stop this? Also, I am
getting emailed upon these attacks. But all it says is the severity level.
How do I get what exactly is
Couple thoughts here Rick. First off, always consider that there may be
(and usually are) flaws in secondary source material and thus don't believe
everything you read.Beyond that, I have a couple questions related to
the matter.
Primarily, what exactly is a hybrid routing protocol?
Thanks all for those who responded. I really appreciate for each one of
your responses
and I got a real understanding from each ones answer.
Thanks once again.
Rajesh
Rajesh Kumar wrote:
Hi all,
CCIE Practical studies - Vol I book - EIGRP chapter says that the
bandwidth command used in
An opportunity for misunderstanding that underlies this thread involves the
following:
DEFAULT costs are calculated for cisco OSPF interfaces based upon
traditional bandwidth values associated with interface types. What's not
clear is how the ospf process does this. Does anyone have any insight?
Hi there,
What is the best way to secure a Aironet 350 from hackers? It is
only local in my office.
Thanks,
Rich
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44152t=44152
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Dear Kevin
The PVC is established and up whether traffic is there or not. Packets will
take the same path.
In case of SVC, during initialisation, the session is estabilshed
dynamically and the all packets will take the same path during that session.
Thus, link can be better utilized.
Hope
Sorry if this turns up twice - seems to be a problem with the groupstudy
mail server?
Rick,
Since you seem so certain, in what way is EIGRP a link-state protocol?
What link-state attributes does it have?
I haven't read all of the article at the link you've given, but I note
that in the intro
Hello,What is the command that tests all 7 layers of the OSI?My answer is
any protocol that works at the Application layer including telnet, ftp
etc. But my coworker thinks it's only telnet?Anyone with ideas??Thanks!
Chat
So I finnally have time to just try things. And what do I do? Try
something that doesn't seem to work.
I mirrored the configs from the CCO for a PIX to PIX to PIX IPSec fully
meshed VPN. All seemed well, until I tried a h323 conversation between
PC's behind different PIX's. This did not work.
I believe a 2500 series can act as a router for dot1q trunking. While 10mb
isnt recommended because of overhead, it should work in a lab environment to
gain experience with trunking.
- Original Message -
From: Marco Gaona
To:
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 8:48 PM
Subject: RE: 2900
Yes, We are using CSS to load balance between five Microsoft Terminal
Servers.
Best regards,
Michael Williams wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What are you using to do the load balancing? The Windows machines? Or
something in the Cisco, like Server Load
Although, I don't entirely disagree with you I have not had
any luck finding any documents on EIGRP that stated it was not
a Hybrid Protocol or did not list enough Link-State qualities to
include it as a partial Link-State Protocol. That is outside of one
document by you.
Rick
- Original
Hi,
Latest update is at
http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/sw-ciscosecure.shtml
For the attacks you cant do anything other than blocking or reset. You can
change the severtiy level for e-mails.
Best regards,
Johnson, Richard (NY Int) wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
At 6:42 PM -0400 5/13/02, Rick wrote:
Priscilla,
I hate to differ with you on this Hybrid or not but the source says
it is considered a Hybrid routing Protocol. check the link for yourself
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/en_igrp.htm
I myself am not a fan Lammle, but on
The 2926T and the 2901 are two of them.
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Don Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Which Catalyst uses CatOS [7:44107]
Hi all,
I was wondering which catalyst switches use the
Brian-
I'm with you on this one... I've been doing this for 8 years now, and by all
of the documentation and teaching by others that I've ever heard, MS
Clients, just like any other Networking client, follows the Rule of if you
have more than one DNS Server listed to query against... the client
Brian's description is precisely how NT 4 works. I'd say the same for 2000,
but they effected a lot of scary changes to the networking implementation
during their latest OS rewrite. Shortly after the 1st post appeared, I
verified firsthand (ethereal a browser: most likely much quicker than the
EIGRP does use poison reverse, and that's more evidence of its
distance-vector behavior.
I think I have been excluded again. I wish the proctor would let me back
in! :-()
Priscilla
At 12:15 AM 5/14/02, Michael L. Williams wrote:
I agree with Kent. Although the link you (Rick) provided
Forgot to send this to list as well.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Mandulak
To: Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994]
Lammle refers to EIGRP as being a Hybrid of distance-vector and link
state.
At 4:25 PM -0400 5/13/02, Logan, Harold wrote:
You're right about IGRP still being listed on the CCNA objectives. While
I've sometimes found it frustrating to teach an outdated protocol, IGRP is
useful as a teaching tool. With IGRP you can easily demonstrate the concept
of composite metrics,
Howard, for the life of me I am certain I recall a discussion like this a
couple of years ago on Groupstudy, and that you verified that there was
indeed an open IGRP standard out there somewhere.
Perhaps you're thinking of the Rutgers Paper by Hedrick. Cisco
made legal incantations that IGRP
I will be on vacation from 5-7-02 to 5-22-02. Any matter regarding network
management please forward to Bob Taylor @ 213-979-0032. Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44172t=44172
--
FAQ, list archives, and
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Likely requries enterprise code on some 2900s
see
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml
Bill K
On Mon, 13 May 2002 15:36:43 -0400 GEORGE wrote:
Im trying to trunk a 2900 switch but does not have the switchport
Rick,
Since you seem so certain, in what way is EIGRP a link-state protocol?
What link-state attributes does it have?
I haven't read all of the article at the link you've given, but I note
that in the intro what it actually says is Enhanced IGRP integrates the
capabilities of link-state
Hi,
I updated recently the boot image for a 7200 router from
c7200-boot-mz.111-22.CC (very old one) to c7200-kboot-mz.122-1.bin
Now when the router reloads I get this error message:
%SYS-7-NV_BLOCK_INIT: Initalized the geometry of nvram
%-4-SERVUNDEF: The server-group tacacs+ is not
At 4:25 PM -0400 5/13/02, Logan, Harold wrote:
You're right about IGRP still being listed on the CCNA objectives. While
I've sometimes found it frustrating to teach an outdated protocol, IGRP is
useful as a teaching tool. With IGRP you can easily demonstrate the concept
of composite metrics,
At 4:41 PM -0400 5/13/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
At 04:13 PM 5/13/02, Mike Mandulak wrote:
Lammle refers to EIGRP as being a Hybrid of distance-vector and link
state.
This is a confusion caused by Cisco marketing, partially because they
associated update-only protocols with a hello
In your scenario. PC2 will do a lookup to to find out if PC1 is on the same
subnet as itself (when it's trying to reply). After it does this lookup if
it determines that it's on the same subnet (by looking at the address and
mask) it'll send out a ARP request to resolve the layer 2 address of
Hi
When using css for firewall balancing
Can i give different weight values for different firewalls?
I mean 70 % of traffic must flow on firewall 1, 30 % of traffic must flow on
firewall?
Is it possible?
If so which command does this?
Can someone send me some examples of firewall load balancing
Have a look at the following paper.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/cuso/epso/sqfr/safwl_wp.htm
Tim
CCIE 9015
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Johnson, Richard (NY Int)
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44184t=44135
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Below is some information that i've pulled from Cisco.com
Summary
Cisco Systems's EIGRP is one of the most feature-rich and robust routing
protocols to ever be developed. Its unique combination of features blends
the best attributes of distance vector protocols with the best attributes of
Telnet and ftp both work at the application layer. You are correct.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Cisco Nuts
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cmd. to test all 7 layers of the OSI?? [7:44157]
Although, I don't entirely disagree with you I have not had
any luck finding any documents on EIGRP that stated it was not
a Hybrid Protocol or did not list enough Link-State qualities to
include it as a partial Link-State Protocol. That is outside of one
document by you.
Rick
Find ONE
Please don't leave out the people who think they are technical, think they
already know what the problem is, feed you interpretations instead of facts
and then want you to take steps to fix the problem that wouldn't work even
if their diagnosis WAS correct.
- Original Message -
From:
It's probably insufficient to refer to the source of igrp without
referring to the source for allegedly open standards terminology used to
misdescribe routing protocols such as distance vector (hint: NOT cisco . .
.). Then again, when referring to the source for IGRP, depending upon the
aspect of
Why expensive, I told you a free download link, not let you buy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44192t=44116
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
I am looking for a good definition of bit time
I found on a networking encyclopedia that bit time is the same as bit rate
i.e. the ratio of the number of bits transferred between devices in a
specific amount of time, typically a second.
I am not satisfied by this definition. For example in the
I will be on vacation from 5-7-02 to 5-22-02. Any matter regarding network
management please forward to Bob Taylor @ 213-979-0032. Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44147t=44147
--
FAQ, list archives, and
At 4:25 PM -0400 5/13/02, Logan, Harold wrote:
You're right about IGRP still being listed on the CCNA objectives. While
I've sometimes found it frustrating to teach an outdated protocol, IGRP is
useful as a teaching tool. With IGRP you can easily demonstrate the concept
of composite metrics,
Although, I don't entirely disagree with you I have not had
any luck finding any documents on EIGRP that stated it was not
a Hybrid Protocol or did not list enough Link-State qualities to
include it as a partial Link-State Protocol. That is outside of one
document by you.
Rick
Find ONE
At 4:41 PM -0400 5/13/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
At 04:13 PM 5/13/02, Mike Mandulak wrote:
Lammle refers to EIGRP as being a Hybrid of distance-vector and link
state.
This is a confusion caused by Cisco marketing, partially because they
associated update-only protocols with a hello
Any application that you can run on your PC in my eyes would test all 7
layers. Including that MSN messenger product that's quoted at the bottom
of your message.
tim
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking for a good definition of bit time
I found on a networking encyclopedia that bit time is the same as bit rate
i.e. the ratio of the number of bits transferred between devices in a
specific amount of time, typically a second.
I am not satisfied by this definition. For example in the
Although, I don't entirely disagree with you I have not had
any luck finding any documents on EIGRP that stated it was not
a Hybrid Protocol or did not list enough Link-State qualities to
include it as a partial Link-State Protocol. That is outside of one
document by you.
Rick
Find ONE
Personally, when I'm teaching beginning IP, I start with binary, and
then VLSM/CIDR becomes a natural idea. I then introduce dotted
decimal, and only as an afterthought mention classes. Works well
whenever I've tried it.
This is of course natural, but have you ever wandered how it
Please don't leave out the people who think they are technical, think they
already know what the problem is, feed you interpretations instead of facts
and then want you to take steps to fix the problem that wouldn't work even
if their diagnosis WAS correct.
- Original Message -
From:
Hi all,
Our company's data network just implement xot (x.25 over TCP) to connect
several x.25 devices through a Cisco 2600 routers. Everything is fine.
However, we found that when a x.25 device make several x.25 connections (say
5) to the other x.25 device, the routers' CPU loading was increased
Hi Rich,
First thing to do is to trace the signal. I.e. what are the physical limits
of the RF. Special wireless tools (like the Sniffer Wireless) are available
to help you with this, but the software delivered with your Aironet can tell
you a lot as well.
If the signal stays within the
Hi,
Does anyone have any information on differences / benefits between cisco
ipt versus 3com ipt.
Jon McGlashan
Diagonal Secure Networks Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dsnuk.com
Tel: +44 (0)1256 869000
Fax: +44 (0)1256 869001
This e-mail may contain confidential
Hi Murali,
This definitely is a strange problem. I would advise to put sniffers on both
ends of the connection (so one between the NT Server and Router A and one
between router C and the Win98 client), try to logon and than watch the
packet flow for any anomalies. Especially keep an eye on the
At 4:25 PM -0400 5/13/02, Logan, Harold wrote:
You're right about IGRP still being listed on the CCNA objectives. While
I've sometimes found it frustrating to teach an outdated protocol, IGRP is
useful as a teaching tool. With IGRP you can easily demonstrate the concept
of composite metrics,
Hi Pierre,
A bit-time is the time it takes to send a bit.
For 10Mb Ethernet a bit-time is a 100 nanoseconds (10 Megabit per second, so
1 bit per 100 nanoseconds), for Fast Ethernet it is 10 nanoseconds and so on.
So if a workstation on a Fast Ethernet network were to wait 5 bit-times, it
At 06:42 PM 5/13/02, Rick wrote:
Priscilla,
I hate to differ with you on this Hybrid or not but the source says
it is considered a Hybrid routing Protocol. check the link for yourself
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/en_igrp.htm
Nope, the source is wrong too. I know Cisco
It's probably insufficient to refer to the source of igrp without
referring to the source for allegedly open standards terminology used to
misdescribe routing protocols such as distance vector (hint: NOT cisco . .
.). Then again, when referring to the source for IGRP, depending upon the
aspect of
I suppose this would depend on the behavior of PC2. Will it send ARP
requests for all destinations if it doesn't have a default gateway
configured? If so -- and you have Proxy ARP configured on Router B --
then yes, Router B will respond with its own MAC address, allowing PC2
to communicate
OK..lets get it all OUT come on ...deep breath`s...
check this...
not only are they cranky ...but some stupid old manager had decieded to give
various groups our passwords and have locked out there own switch es ...wont
tell us the passwords...which are located in secure rooms for which
I don't usually contradict what somene says but when they're way off, I need
to.
First off; WEP IS UNSECURE! It dosen't matter if it's 64 or 128 bit, they
ar both just as easy to hack (air snort).
Second, MAC address security isn't secure, as you can spoof them.
Third, even if you can't pick
Careful with the resets, as someone could spoof a server of your, causing
you to send a reset to one of your own servers, taking it off line.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
Cisco Breaker wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
Latest
Cisco's is more feture rich and scalable. 3Com is cheaper, unless you use
an ICS 7750 from Cisco, which brings the price down close to 3Com.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
Jon Mcglashan wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
Does
I will be on vacation from 5-7-02 to 5-22-02. Any matter regarding network
management please forward to Bob Taylor @ 213-979-0032. Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44211t=44211
--
FAQ, list archives, and
What are you balancing on? Have you configured the CSS to balance on
least connections because the default is round robin. These are your
load balancing options, Round Robin(default),Weighted Round Robin,Least
Connections/Bytes, and
ArrowPoint Content Aware (ACA).
If you want to balance
At 4:47 AM -0400 5/14/02, Ouellette, Tim wrote:
Below is some information that i've pulled from Cisco.com
Summary
Cisco Systems's EIGRP is one of the most feature-rich and robust routing
protocols to ever be developed. Its unique combination of features blends
the best attributes of distance
It's probably insufficient to refer to the source of igrp without
referring to the source for allegedly open standards terminology used to
misdescribe routing protocols such as distance vector (hint: NOT cisco . .
.). Then again, when referring to the source for IGRP, depending upon the
aspect of
At 7:11 AM -0400 5/14/02, dovelet wrote:
Hi all,
Our company's data network just implement xot (x.25 over TCP) to connect
several x.25 devices through a Cisco 2600 routers. Everything is fine.
However, we found that when a x.25 device make several x.25 connections (say
5) to the other x.25
If anybody is studying for the BCMSN, or needs to know which models have
what CLI (Command Line Interface), I put together a document with the
switches grouped by CLI, with a sample configuration of each at
www.laganiere.net a few months ago. I hope it proves useful...
Thanks...
--- Dennis
Steven,
Way off Hmmmthe only thing I indeed forgot to mention is the
directional antenna-danger, but to say I'm way off...that's a strong
statement.
First of all let me clarify myself. My final comment, Again, which solution
to go for depends on your security needs and how much you're
At 7:04 AM -0400 5/14/02, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
Personally, when I'm teaching beginning IP, I start with binary, and
then VLSM/CIDR becomes a natural idea. I then introduce dotted
decimal, and only as an afterthought mention classes. Works well
whenever I've tried it.
This is
I've used the Transcender, FastTrack and Boson tests.
Transcender: Okay tests but some questions/answers were just plain wrong. I
stopped using them before my first CCNP test. They were okay for CCNA.
FastTrack: Old, outdated, it seemed to me. Had wrong info in them as well. I
gave up on these
Check on the cisco 806 router. I think it has about four ethernet ports.
other new 800 series routers that they
just released should statisfy what you intend to do
Ateg
From: M.C. van den Bovenkamp
Reply-To: M.C. van den Bovenkamp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cheapest router
At 4:41 PM -0400 5/13/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
At 04:13 PM 5/13/02, Mike Mandulak wrote:
Lammle refers to EIGRP as being a Hybrid of distance-vector and link
state.
This is a confusion caused by Cisco marketing, partially because they
associated update-only protocols with a hello
They are real cheap. I paid $1200 and I would be lucking to get $500 for
it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cheapest router supporting two ethernet ports [7:44061]
2514's have
For basic product comparisons, go to www.telezoo.com . They have some
good high level comps and then you can dig into the details from there.
Sincerely,
Patrick J Greene
-Original Message-
From: Jon Mcglashan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:25 AM
To:
Here my favorite. About 10 years ago at a customer site a user was had a
non-IBM token ring card, the manufacturer of the NIC wanted to prove that it
could make a faster T/R card than IBM so they set the bridge priority bit on
every packet. Then to top it off the user had installed a screen saver
Btwthere's a great article on Wireless security on
http://www.networkcomputing.com/1303/1303ws2.html
This article also shows the importance of finding the right balance between
risk assessment, cost and convenience.
Message Posted at:
True not everyone needs Fort Knox, but I just wanted make sure you didn't
believe that WEP is secure. That's been my mantra the past month - to
inform people to the dangers of relying on WEP.
C restion wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Steven,
Way off
I figured pretty much why I can do trunking on this switch
Imp running a very low ios and basically I cant upgrade because I have 4
mb of ram the minimum is 8 of dram
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:07 AM
To: [EMAIL
I trying to upgrade my cisco 2900 switch and according to the
documentation I need at least
This ios 11.2(8)SA4 (Enterprise Edition) to be able to run trunking.
However, on Cisco web site I can find it only up to ios 12.0 which I
can't install because I don't have sufficient dram ,4mbs does
Sounds like your cow-orker was trained in the Miscrosoft way. Any networked
application verifies the stack if it is functioning.
--Tim
Cisco Nuts wrote:
Hello,What is the command that tests all 7 layers of the OSI?My
answer is
any protocol that works at the Application layer including
I mentioned this in a previous email but it appears that some of my
responses from yesterday either didn't make it to the list or they
arrived quite late.
The default OSPF cost for an interface is 10^8 / Bandwidth. In this
case, 'bandwidth' is the current setting of that parameter regardless of
Hi..
I have a small improvement on the problem.. now this is what i did.. on rtr
C i put access-lists such that only reqd data passes through.. and this
resulted in clients logging without any problems.. also the users there said
that after this was put the client part of this foxpro based
Hi!
Can anyone tell me more about the ccna new exam 640-607.
Is the question format same as 507, except the simulated lab??
Ron
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44226t=44226
--
FAQ, list archives, and
I think the only way to secure a wlan is to require vpn authentication
through the bridge. (Which means some hand held clients would not be able
to authenticate.) The client should have the vpn software loaded on their
machine/laptop, connect to a bridge residing on a vlan that has no
Thank you Remmert. Can I assume that with a 16 Mb Token ring a bit time
would be 16 bits per seconds?
Pierre-Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of C
restion
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: bit time
interesting discussion.
a couple of thoughts of minor value.
1) one way to determine whether or not (E)IGRP is a distance vector or not
is to consider that (E)IGRP has a definite diameter limit that is
changeable. Several months ago there was a discussion on this board about
just that. If you
Okay... we've got a 5513 with RSM and a 6509 with Sup2 + MSFC2... they
are trunked together (at layer 2). I've got HSRP configured for 7 other
VLANs on the same two switches and don't have this problem with any of them
except this one VLAN.
I would try to explain the problem, but here's
Can you change the logical configuration of FR by
using P2P subinterfaces.
This will make all routes go via hub router.
--- Cisco Nuts wrote:
Yes, policy routing could very well be the solution
without using FR map
statements. But how would I go about doing this? I
mean what kind of
what do you want? instruction? ios image?
hktco
- Original Message -
From: Kris Keen
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: Upgrade IOS on 2504, Please assist [7:44135]
Anyone?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44232t=44135
Guys,
Any suggestions/experiences on what to buy for a wireless network device for
my home? I'm thinking about the Linksys with the 4 port ethernet model.
Thanks for the ideas...
Travis Bolton
Network Engineer II
CCNP,CCDA
Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of
Under hyperterm you need to specify xmodem transfer/send file via xmodem
first then the router next.
Hope this helps!! MG
hktco wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
what do you want? instruction? ios image?
hktco
- Original Message -
From: Kris Keen
To:
Going from memory here, but I think you are wrong. From what I remember the
ASICs and such on the old 10mb routers cant handle the larger frame sizes
that could be generated with dot1q trunking.
Peter
--On Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:19 AM -0400 John Golovich
wrote:
I believe a 2500 series
Thank you Remmert. Can I assume that with a 16 Mb Token ring
a bit time
would be 16 bits per seconds?
16.000.000 bits per second would be safe assumption. Hence, the bit
time is 0.000625s (not quite sure what exact part of second that is :-).
Marko.
Message Posted at:
I will be on vacation from 5-7-02 to 5-22-02. Any matter regarding network
management please forward to Bob Taylor @ 213-979-0032. Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44238t=44238
--
FAQ, list archives, and
also on your frame relay mapping, make sure you use the keyword BROADCAST.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
CCNP .CA
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Give up...Cannot ping from one spoke to another??
Hi all,
I'm configuring a Cisco 2621 for VPN connection. Im typing in the
configuration and I dont get any error message but when I want to see my
running config, some part of the config are not there
here is a part of the IPSEC config I want to have:
crypto map vpnmap 50 ipsec-manual
Thank you everyone for the feedback. Although configuring the default
gateway on PC2 with its own IP address allowed me to ping from PC1 to PC2,
it caused some other problems in a part of the network that I omitted, so I
had to re-configure it back without a default gateway. Let me re-draw the
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
