Does anyone know of a way to clear or tear-down individual connections on a
PIX Firewall? By using the show conn command I can see the connections I
want to clear but don't now how to.
Thanks in advance.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46423t=46423
Dear Friends,
I am a CCIE candidate currently in Mumbai, Looking for some friends ofcourse
CISCO PROS to come together and form a study group.
If there is any group of such kind already there, I would love to join it.
Pls reply in personal to my direct email add.
Shaikh Raees
Hi ,
I have a WAN connection my branch in Sydney to the head office in London. I
need to access the web page that located in London web server. Normally, I
feel the access is very slow when the link is congested. It is a 256K link.
But now when I feel the access is very slow too but the link
Digging a hole might not be such a good idea. According to an IBM article,
they claim that radon gas can also produce the problem. So I guess you
shouldn't put equipment in the basement either.
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/401/curtis.html
- Original Message -
From: Frank
My bewilderment comes from my previous belief that Cisco, your company,
was promoting the 6000 and 6500 series switches as the replacement to the
5xxx series. I have recommeded since last August to use the 65xx because
of this. Of course I thought this switch would be on the test! It is a
I agree! I am confused on the issue. I ordered the GBIC-SX for the 6509
but was worried about the difference between it and the WS-X5484. What is
the difference?? I can't find any information saying concretely that
there is a difference.
Theo
Chuck
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When there is no MAC address on serial interface, how the packets are
routing ?
Stanzin
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
a name of winmail.dat]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46429t=46429
you have some good points
However we have 35 + buildings in our campus and I have
almost as many 3500xls as I do 6509's in my IDF/BDF/Labs.
6500 switches will only prepare you for enterprise work, and
we sell alot of small systems as well to medium business's. My
opinion is if I know vlans
I have a PIX firewall sitting between market data segment and my LAN. The
PIX outside interface is facing to market data segment and inside interface
facing LAN.
By default, the outgoing traffic from LAN to the market data segment are
permitted. And incoming traffic from market data segment
Hi Tim
use clear xlate command.
fahim
Tim Champion wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Does anyone know of a way to clear or tear-down individual connections on
a
PIX Firewall? By using the show conn command I can see the connections I
want to clear but don't now
Hi group,
we have a customer to which we r providing bandwith on ethernet through
lan extender.Now i have to restrict him on 32 kbps bandwidth on
ethernet.we have cisco 2610 router so i cannot implement ratelimit on my
ethernet because all of our traffic goes throuh ethernet .So can
somebody
Ashish,
Meaning no disrespect, I am sure that you would agree with me when I say,
memorizing a command is different to doing it on router/switch.
If a question asked:
Configure Ether0 on a router with the following address 172.22.22.2/23, what
would the command be
(a) (config-if)# ip address
You can ratelimit his mac address. O
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
kaushalender wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi group,
we have a customer to which we r providing bandwith on ethernet through
lan extender.Now i have to restrict him on 32 kbps bandwidth on
Theo,
By no means is the 3550 replacing the 6500 in a real world scenario. The
3550 is an IDF non-chassis switch. The most density you can get is 48
10/100 ports. However, the IOS structure and layer 3 capabilities allow you
to mimic a lot of the new functionality that you have in the 6500. This
point-to-point, so no mac is needed. There is only one recepient.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Stanzin Takpa wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
When there is no MAC address on serial interface, how the packets are
routing ?
Stanzin
[GroupStudy.com removed an
Hi,
Does anyone know what's the passing mark for CVOICE 9E0-423 exam?
cheers!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46438t=46438
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Hi all,
I am unable to find from the archive the discussion on the 5-4-3 rule.
What is the definition of a segment for 10BaseT? How can I apply the 5-4-3
rule in a 10BaseT network? I attended a Novell class a few years back and
was taught that in the 10BaseT network, it makes use of a
I don't have both the isakmp statements in my PIX, why do I need it on both
interfaces when the crypto map is on only the outside? Also I have two other
PIX working OK with the only the one statement
Cheers
Pat
--
email me on : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brunner Joseph wrote in message
[EMAIL
Give him a modem..
Does he have one IP address?
I believe you should be able to rate limit that one address. Just setup your
access list for his address or range...
Just a guess.
don
- Original Message -
From: kaushalender
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:08 AM
Subject: help
Hi,
Could you explain a bit more what happen after October ?
Thanks
Philip
- Original Message -
Wrom: IYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKED
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:09 AM
Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
you apparently dont need the token or cat switch
anymore if
YES, please do explain what happens after October.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
Hi,
Could you explain a bit more what happen after October
Are you saying that you need your Bloomberg behind the Pix to communicate?
Then yes, you will need to create static maps to those pc's and open ports
for Bloomberg to those pc's. I would say open them only to Bloombergs and
Reuters. Bloomberg actually has a paper on doing internet connections
Hello Group,
I have received an email from Cisco that the current CCIE exam will retire
between July 15 and July 30.
Reza
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46445t=46445
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I've just started to use CW2000 after it had been installed by a
colleague. I have a Sun workstation and Netscape 4.78, the problem
I have is that Netscape doesn't display all the frames sometimes or the
data in a page. I do have a Windows machine and it does display the
pages but very slowly.
At 2:59 AM -0400 6/13/02, Kenny Smith wrote:
Hi ,
I have a WAN connection my branch in Sydney to the head office in London. I
need to access the web page that located in London web server. Normally, I
feel the access is very slow when the link is congested. It is a 256K link.
Is this formally
I would like to revise and extend your answer. :-)
A serial interface is not *always* point-to-point.
The answer actually depends on the Layer 2 protocol you are using.
If you are using Frame-relay, you have a DLCI mapped to the IP address. On
ATM you have a VPI/VCI combo. On point-to-point
Some people have been asking me about the hunt for Peter Rosenthal (sounds
like a Tom Clancy novel :-).. If you recall last month someone posting as
Peter Rosenthal was making derogatory comments about various people on the
list, GroupStudy.com, and the CCIE Lab program itself. From the
This is what TAC will most often referance when you experience a
parity error:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/122/crashes_pmpe.html
Dave
R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:
I have a client who experienced this as well on a pair of 7206VXR's.
The two routers rebooted themselves due to memory
We have one we are beta testing some stuff with. I really like the
fact that it has an internal PS and you can rack mount it. Other than
that and an additional VIC slot it's not much differant than a 1751.
Dave
R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:
Look at the new 1700's (I think it's called 1760
Have a look at the link from Cisco. They will be removing Token Ring and the
3920 Switch and replacing the 5500's with 3550's which can do layer 3 and
other new advanced features.
Tim
CCIE 9015
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18
-Original Message-
Howdy,
Dows anyone know if the PIX 6.2 software is available yet?
Clayton Dukes
Cisco Info Center SE
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46454t=46454
--
FAQ, list archives, and
after that what will they be revising the syllabus, or new exam format
? or what after that..
Murali
-Original Message-
From: Reza
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/13/02 4:56 PM
Subject: End of CCIE Written [7:46445]
Hello Group,
I have received an email from Cisco that the current
New exam format.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
after that what will they be revising the syllabus, or new exam format
? or what after that..
Murali
-Original Message-
From: Reza
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/13/02 4:56 PM
Subject: End of CCIE
There's a couple of threads running about it right now on the group.
Basically Cisco has announced Token Ring, IPX and a few other things are
gone from the lab in October. Like I say, review some of the other current
threads and you'll see more detail...
--- Dennis
- Original Message
That assumes that he has an address space to announce via BGP, which I he
did not mention so I assumed he did not have one. Without your own address
space, BGP isn't going to do anything for you. Yes, if the T1 goes down,
the servers would be unreachable, but without your own address space
I don't think Cisco is primarily concerned with the cost of outfitting
their own labs with 6500s. After all, their cost is MUCH lower than the
list prices. I think Cisco is being considerate of OUR wallets. This is the
same reason they don't have 7200 routers and 7500 routers on the equipment
No, but 6.2(1) is :)
PDM 2.0 is also available. Have both in my lab and they seem pretty stable
so far.
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Clayton Dukes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]
Howdy,
Dows
Besides we are being tested on technologies, not products.
Thomas Larus wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I don't think Cisco is primarily concerned with the cost of outfitting
their own labs with 6500s. After all, their cost is MUCH lower than the
list prices.
Hi,
I have read both BGP 4 Command Reference + CCNP Building Scable Cisco
Networks, they both state that peer-group and route reflectors are not
compatible to each other. Yet, when I tried to configure both together...
it seems to work for me :( Am I missing something important here?
Cool, thanks :-)
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
- Original Message -
From: Roberts, Larry
To: 'Clayton Dukes' ;
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]
No, but 6.2(1) is :)
PDM 2.0 is also available. Have both in my lab and they seem
from CCO:
Lab Exam Content and Equipment Changes
CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical content and equipment
in the lab exam. Effective October 1st, 2002, candidates will no longer be
tested in the areas of IGRP, Token Ring, Token Ring Switching, or IPX. Note:
DLSW+ will
...if I know vlans and switching, I can setup a 6500 as easy
as a 3500...
This right here is what I think one of the biggest points are with this
change in the LAB. Cisco doesn't have to waste money on their own LAB
by putting in the 6500, if the same objectives can be proven by the test
taker
Because it's a low-price switch that supports:
--(from cisco's website)--
Key Enterprise Features
Allows you to deploy network-wide intelligent services with the simplicity
of traditional LAN switching
Extends a set of Layer 2-to-Layer 4 features in Cisco IOS. Software- IP
routing, QoS,
Thanks for the compliment :-)
Running a website is somewhat of a thankless business (ask the Groupstudy
founder), especially when that website is free
I've been collecting study guides for a while, the website has been running
for about 4 years now :-)
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
I put together a free document with accumulated list wisdom on starting lab
preparation on www.laganiere.net, but just off the top of my head -
1) You only need one terminal server, and the 2511's sell well on ebay, so
I'd keep the better one, and sell the other to raise cash to buy some of the
Hi,
in case someone else catches this gotcha.
I finished testing a vpn between a pix 6.1(1) and a fw-1 (nokia ip71, 4.1).
Followed the guide in the cisco site at
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/cp-p.html
Nothing worked initially when trying to open the vpn from the pix inside,
some errors
Does anybody know what the difference is between a Catalyst 2950 and a
Catalyst 3550? I read the product literature but couldn't really pinpoint
what the differences are. Cisco wouldn't sell them as two different
products if they do the same thing, right???
Message Posted at:
Route Reflection within peer groups is a common practise.
At 11:26 AM 6/13/2002 -0400, Hunt Lee wrote:
Hi,
I have read both BGP 4 Command Reference + CCNP Building Scable Cisco
Networks, they both state that peer-group and route reflectors are not
compatible to each other. Yet, when I tried
it is
Clayton Dukes wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Howdy,
Dows anyone know if the PIX 6.2 software is available yet?
Clayton Dukes
Cisco Info Center SE
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
Message Posted at:
I think the 3550 has faster backplane, more Routing protocols, gig ports for
access devices, HSRP, ACL's, multicast routing.
Sandra Carr wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Does anybody know what the difference is between a Catalyst 2950 and a
Catalyst 3550? I read
IE 6.0
Patrick Donlon wrote:
I've just started to use CW2000 after it had been installed by a
colleague. I have a Sun workstation and Netscape 4.78, the
problem
I have is that Netscape doesn't display all the frames
sometimes or the
data in a page. I do have a Windows machine and it does
yeah, there's no need for MAC address as such for PPP interfaces.
but what about PPP over ethernet.
- Original Message -
From: timothy thielen
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: Serial no MAC [7:46429]
I would like to revise and extend your answer. :-)
A
I'm using peer-groups with route-reflectors on different Cisco platforms
(2500, 7500, 12000) and it works fine !!
--
Stephane LITKOWSKI
Student in a French computer science school
EPITA Telecom Network specialization
CCNA + CCNP
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hunt Lee a icrit dans le message de
Thanks!! This is exactly what I was looking for. I have heard of this, but
I can't always remember the acronyms!!
Thanks again!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46475t=46203
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's
Professional mailing list. Because
the server does not recognize you as a confirmed
poster, you will be required
to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail
address and are not a
spammer. By confirming
Can you point to the pages where you saw this on BGP 4 command reference. I
couldn't find any thing to that effect. I took the CBCR class and we used
peer groups with Reflectors, it seemed to work fine.
Hunt Lee wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I have read
I have a cat 6000 at work available for testing. Is there any major
difference (other then backplane capacity) as compared to 3550 or 6500. I
guess I just wanted to know that performance aside, are rest of the IOS
features supported same accross all three platforms. I plan to use it for
CCIE
Is Wic-1enet only supported in the 122-2.XJ releases. I tried using later
releases like 122-6f and 122-10a but none of them recognize this WIC. I am
worried if it will be supported in any future releases. Does any one else
have the same experience.
Thanks,
JZ
Message Posted at:
I've noticed that Netscape 4.78 is slow on our very fast Unix server, as
well. I believe that Netscape 6.0 is available from Sun. Perhaps you
should try that one to see if they've improved the speed.
Jason Owens 6/13/02 11:15:13 AM
IE 6.0
Patrick Donlon wrote:
I've just started to use
Are they using 6x00 switches in the lab? I thought they were still using
Cat5000s and therefore the CatOS and Set/Show/Clear commands. If that is
still the case, you wouldn't want to use a 3550 as it uses IOS (config t,
etc). I know the 6000s and 6500s you can use in Hybrid (CatOS) or Native
I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my
question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring interface
to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after Token Ring is
completely out
thanks in advance
Message Posted at:
I bet you that the new lab's format/blueprint will resemble the new CCIE
beta's blueprint. I'm pretty sure the announcement will be made at the
Networkers CCIE power-session in San Diego in 2 weeks. So, it doesn't sound
easier, but at least the topics are up-to-date. The only thing I don't
Hunt is right, on the web they do say that peer groups are not compatible
with route reflectors due to route withdrawal problems, I don't know about
the book. Here is a link to the website that states it about 3/4 of the way
down the page, I also have no problem running redundant reflectors
yes.
Khalsa Singh wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab Equipment to prepare for CCIE lab, my
question is, do I still have to buy cisco routers with Token Ring
interface
to practise DLSW since it is going to be in the lab after
Hi you all , imp trying to use this config from Cisco web site
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pix3000.htmland I has some
questions.
Suppose if my network has for inside address 10.254.2.1 255.255.255.248
Those the vpn ip pool have to be in the same network as the inside
address,
DLSW can still be configured and tested without Token Ring.
-Original Message-
From: Khalsa Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
I'm in the middle of buying CCIE Lab
How is that possible, do you have a link to a url that explains how to do
it, if that's possible then I can exclude all the routers that have token
ring interface, I really wanted to know, since I have made a commitment to
somebody to buy the whole CCIE Lab this saturday
thanks in advance
How is that possible, do you have a link to a url that explains how to do
it, if that's possible then I can exclude all the routers that have token
ring interface, I really wanted to know, since I have made a commitment to
somebody to buy the whole CCIE Lab this saturday
thanks in advance
As has been mentioned here else where in this group that Cat6000s are in
place in some labsites but also that the new CCIE lab format in October
replaces cat5000s with Cat3550s.
Michael L. Williams wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Are they using 6x00 switches in the
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46492t=46492
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the url, i don't why the url didn't show in my previous post I'm
going to try again
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3550/prodlit/c3550_qp.htm
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46493t=46493
Looking for a guy by the name of CHarles Riley, sometime on this group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46494t=46494
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
All,
Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took the exam
months ago.no results yetjust wondering if anyone had gotten
anything back from cisco yet
Curious,
Jason Clark, CCNP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
One important question though:
Will Cisco continue to focus on the Cat 5 for the CCNP switching or will
they do away with it and focus on the CAT3550?
If so, then keeping my CAT5 does not make sense. But then who would buy
itpaid millions for it :-(
Regards.
From: Dennis Laganiere
The following links deal with DLSw and Ethernet, and DLSw topics in general
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/697/3.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/3.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/697/index.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/index.shtml
-Original Message-
The 3550 support layer 3 with EMI software and the 3550's are more
powerful higher end switches just beneath the chassis systems.
Dave
Sandra Carr wrote:
Does anybody know what the difference is between a Catalyst 2950 and a
Catalyst 3550? I read the product literature but couldn't
Hi,
Does you guys have a copy of that official announcement from Cisco? I'd like
to see that. I'm in preparation to take the current one..guess I wanna know
if that is indeed the official word so I can cough up that $300 bux.
Message Posted at:
Thanks Ryan,
I'm confused, so when cisco says, no token ring in the CCIE lab from oct
2002 but DLSW will be there, what does that mean. Should we expect to
configure DLSW on TR-to-TR network or Eth-to-Eth network or WAN or both in
the Lab
Khalsa Singh wrote in message
[EMAIL
I am currently studying how to determine how many switches are in the path
by looking at the RIF field. I know that RCF stand for Route Control Field
and RDF is Route Descriptor Field but what is RIF? Route Information Field?
Sorry for the lame question it's just bugging me. :-0
MG
Message
My take is that while Token Ring will not be there, Ethernet will. And as
such, DLSw is still a subject that can be tested. If they are removing
Token Ring, then the SRB facets of DLSw are going to be dropped.
-Original Message-
From: Khalsa Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
How about over a WAN link?!?!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Khalsa Singh
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
Thanks Ryan,
I'm confused, so when cisco
I recall reading somewhere, maybe this board, that you can create virtual
Token-Ring interfaces. On my 2500/2600 and 4500 series routers I can do the
following:
ROUTER1(config)#int virtual-TokenRing ?
Virtual-TokenRing interface number
Here is an example:
ROUTER4(config)#int virtual-To
... Because of the fact that the 600 series exam just came out, and the
3550 has only been out roughly since March of this year (don't quote me
on this), I doubt you will see the 3550 even mentioned on the new
switching exam.
Just my .0010 cents
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
It's just occured to me that with that one announcement Cisco has made all
the
Token Ring stuff sold on Ebay, for various home labs, worthless.and saved
me a pretty penny.
Mike Graham
CCNP, CCDP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46497t=46497
Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces
Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B
Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call
router B or vice-versa (basic stuff).
When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link
Posted to Cisco Newsgroup at 3:30 on June 13, 2002
Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces
Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B
Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call
router B or vice-versa (basic stuff).
When Router A is called by
It will be Ethernet only. No TR interfaces at al will be in the lab.
Khalsa Singh wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Thanks Ryan,
I'm confused, so when cisco says, no token ring in the CCIE lab from oct
2002 but DLSW will be there, what does that mean. Should we
Ok with the new news, are there any alternatives to the 3550 switch that
have the same functionality ie. layer 3, etc. just at a cheaper price?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46510t=46510
--
FAQ, list archives,
Thomas Larus wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I don't think Cisco is primarily concerned with the cost of outfitting
their own labs with 6500s. After all, their cost is MUCH lower than the
list prices. I think Cisco is being considerate of OUR wallets. This is
2950 is close. You can get a 3550 EMI on e-bay for $2750.00, but it's
probably hot, as that's lower than what a gold partner can get one for.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Jeff Barr wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ok with the new news, are there any alternatives to
You're just messin' with our minds Kris.
You posted your 4 Cisco items to it yesterday.
How did you do it anyway? I couldn't see how to do it either.
In fact I didn't know it existed until you brought it to light.
Was it just a clever publicity stunt? :-)
Gaz
Kris Keen wrote in message
We put it straight on our production Pix's along with the new PDM (VIPs,
groups etc).
We decided that if we didn't have any faith why should any of our customers,
and we really wanted to play with the Groups anyway.
No problems so far. Must be a month or so now.
Gaz
Clayton Dukes wrote in
I dont think so. this can do anything the 2948G_L3 (wire speed layer 3, etc)
and it has the killer layer 2 stuff we all love !
For the price, this thing rocks!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46515t=46510
--
FAQ,
Routing information field...
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
- Original Message -
From: Mark Godfrey
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:41 PM
Subject: RIF? [7:46503]
I am currently studying how to determine how many switches are in the path
by looking at the RIF
I haven't heard anything yet either
Mike W.
Clark Jason wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
All,
Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took the exam
months ago.no results yetjust wondering if anyone had gotten
anything back from
Michael Graham wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's just occured to me that with that one announcement Cisco has made all
the
Token Ring stuff sold on Ebay, for various home labs, worthless.and
saved
me a pretty penny.
Well, as far as it saving you money,
Has anyone upgraded a PIX 501. All of the current 6.x
files all say they require 32meg DRAM and this 501 only has
16meg. The problem I have is I need to upgrade to a 3DES
license and it requires that I load a new image and I don't
want to take a chance with not being able to get the current
Clark Jason wrote:
All,
Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took
the exam months ago.no results yetjust wondering if
anyone had gotten anything back from cisco yet
Well... as it only ran for three weeks total between April 15 and May 6 it's
just
Okay, like I said, it is good for the test taker.Your point is
accepted.
Theo
Tim O'Brien
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/13/2002 07:59 PM
Please respond to Tim O'Brien
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Not only is TR going... [7:46391]
Yo Mark! Look at my retort to Larry. I was talking not only about the
IDS module but the Content Switching Module as well!
It wasn't as if I was talking about the PIX and VPNs dude. I was talking
about modules and the replacement to the 5xxx switch.
Got the point? I wasn't worried about
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
