This is the Enterprise Design Tool from NetformX. My employer has rolled
this out to all us sales engineer types, and I use it regularly.
Yes it is fairly decent, and I find it useful.
Yes there are a number of irritating bugs. For example, one cannot place a
redundant supervisor into a 6509. Th
This brings to mind a question I have about the neighbor priority statement.
According to the Doc CD, the default value for neighbor priority is 0
I have on a couple of recent labs entered neighbor a.b.c.d and when doing a
show run seen the priority 1 added to the end of the line
I have also sp
Typical layer 8 problem..
The department managers should be discussing this through their regular
channels, working on changing policy. Instead they are asking you to "fix"
something, hoping you will.
Tell me something. If you were to circumvent company policy, were
discovered, and fired, would
Probably the person who did it originally did not understand how the metrics
should be set up.
Reliability goes low to high. Lower is more reliable.
Do a show ip protocol and look at the K values that are reported. I'm
curious as to what they might show.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From:
00 11:33 AM
To: Chuck Larrieu; Cisco Mail List; James Haynes
Subject:RE: Redistribution
At 10:14 AM 11/22/00, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>Probably the person who did it originally did not understand how the
metrics
>should be set up.
>
>Reliability goes low to high. Lower is more reliab
Which consulting firms DON'T do that ;->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
William Gragido
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 12:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Andersen Consulting
Yes. They over
According to the Cisco upgrade planner yes all IOS images for the 2500
series will work on the 2501 through 2525
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
michael
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
Speaking of which, I just got mine in the mail! 17 labs plus suggested
configuration solutions. Plus support. Detailed drawings. Detailed
scenarios. And a suggested troubleshooting preparation document.
No I have not read much yet. But on the surface, this package looks to be of
good value. I'll
idays, everyone.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 1:38 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; Cisco Mail List; James Haynes
Subject:RE: Redistribution
At 12:00 PM 11/22/00, C
Another one I recently have come across is the ip tcp synwait-time, which
allows one to manually set the time the router waits for a tcp connection to
become established. While the documentation states that the purpose is to
allow for long wait times because of slow links, congestion, or slow
resp
Title: RE: annoying line after config t
what
would be some of the downsides to doing a no logging
console?
as I
turn my attention to Lab preparation, I find myself having to think in terms of
tradeoffs. Those logging messages can be quite useful in troubleshooting
situations.
Chuck
-
www.cisco.com lists several Cisco sponsored practice labs.
Also, if you work for a Cisco partner, you may want to check into the cisco
ASET labs.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/767/tre/aset/aset.shtml
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The full and proper command is "traceroute"
This may be abbreviated to "trace"
What differences are you seeing?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John
lay
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: annoying line after config t
The whole point of a hosts file is so you don't need lookups!
- Original Message -----
From: Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dennis Laganiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Politics is the art of compromise, which in and of itself is not necessarily
a Bad Thing.
I would venture the opinion that both 32 and 64 are poor choices in this
more modern age. What was suitable or viable 10-15 years ago is no longer
so. Data folks are now seriously discussing MTU's in the mul
I have heard both Cisco and Checkpoint sales engineers ( not in the same
room at the same time ) agree to the following points:
1) Checkpoint management ( GUI ) is FAR superior to anything Cisco has.
2) PIX is FAR superior in terms of throughput
3) Everything else the vendors say are subject to i
my
customers are asking about.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
hal9001
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 2:00 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: comparison between checkpoint firewall-1 and cisco pix
OK, just got through testing out on of the complex exercises found in the
Slattery/Burton book Advanced IP Routing in Cisco Networks. I truly love
this book, despite the number of technical errors I continue to find. I
still recommend it, particularly with the new edition, which I believe
should b
Part of the learning experience, as frustrating as it may be at times, is
learning to separate the several grades of accurate from the several grades
of inaccurate. One does this by reading from at least two sources, and
asking questions on the forums. There are many wonderful sources out there,
a
Show ip route [name of protocol]
e.g to show all the RIP routes: show ip route rip
HTH
Chuck
133 days or so. Clock's ticking!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL
ehalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 7:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: IP routing tables
Show ip route [name of protocol]
e.g to show all the RIP routes: show ip route rip
HTH
Chuck
133 days or so. Clock's ticking!
-Origin
Wait'll he gets to the CCIE written! Just ask Cthulu! ;->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 6:39 PM
To: Olden Pieterse
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:Re: RANT !! about CCDA
He
I swear the digressions will be the death of me yet!
I've been reading up on route-maps and policy routing. Got to thinking about
something one of my associates at work said to me. He likes to use policy
routing as a means of securing networks in extranet situations. You know -
central site sells
Good idea. Security is too complex and too important to allow folks to palm
themselves off as security experts on the mere basis of having passed an
overly broad 70 question test. ( JMHO )
Chuck
CCNP / Security ;->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
In general, the frame switch config is correct. I believe you have a typo in
your frame route statement under int s 1/1
On your other routers, the interface commands are just your encapsulation
frame-relay and then optionally your lmi-type and interface-dlci commands
Trick of the trade. Frame-re
Yes and no. recall that a DR is elected on a shared broadcast medium,
typically ethernet. ( dumb question - how does this play out in a token ring
environment? My supposition is that it would work out the same, even though
TR is not a broadcast medium )
So if you were to change your scenario to t
sheet. About 5 minutes later, the proctor
returned with a yellow sticky note with my number on it. He then asked me
if I would erase all of my configs and then I left with a huge grin on my
face. I just couldn't believe that all of my studying paid off.
I met Chuck Larrieu a few hours later for
Jeff, in terms of design, security practice, and cost effectiveness, may I
suggest a second 26xx router dedicated to the inter-vlan routing, thus
separating your own internal frame network from your shared tenant services
network.
Costs a LOT less, is every bit as effective, and leaves some dolla
Much as I personally rant about cross posting the two lists, I believe this
one might be worth examination from all levels.
Recall the questions and answers about the purpose of the loopback
interface, particularly in OSPF. Among the answers proposed is that the
loopback, being always up, provide
I'm reminded of the contract negotiation scene in the Marx Brothers movie A
Night at the Opera. :->
"The party of the first part shall be known as the party of the first part,
and the party of the second part shall be known as the party of the second
part."
Taken out of context, I'm not sure I co
OK Howard. I'm not afraid to look foolish in front of everyone.
---
Howard's scenario:
Scenario 1 (R1 is initially misconfigured)
R1 E0: 10.6.0.1 DOWN R2 E0: 10.1.0.1 UP/UP
E1: 10.5.0.2 UP/UP E1: 10.5.0.2 UP/UP
E2: 10.2.0.1 UP/UP
day evening.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:47 PM
To: Howard C. Berkowitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: About OSPF and Loopback port
OK Howard. I'm not afraid to look fool
Adele, it looks to me like DLCI 16 is either incorrectly configured on the
carrier side, or there is a problem on the carrier side. Way down on my list
is something like the CSU is bad or incorrectly configured, or a wiring
problem.
The "deleted" indicates to me that at one time the router saw th
Couple of thoughts come to mind:
Installations unit for a VAR or a consulting firm that is busy ( keep
banging out those configs )
ISP - tech support
Managed network provider ( something like AT&T managed services, for
example ) help desk / technical support area
Along with the volumes of read
Less buggy systems? What, and put us all out of work? ;->
Technology is like the tax code The more perfect you try to make it, the
more work it creates for those whose job it is to guide people through it.
Uh uh. I say throw out the machines and go back to quill pen and parchment.
I mean, co
Chuck
-----Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:47 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; Howard C. Berkowitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: About OSPF and Loopback port
OK, I have run a couple of Q&a
gain for this wonderful discussion.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony
Olzak
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 7:15 PM
To: Jason; Erick B.; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Groupstudy List;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re:
In my mis-spent youth, this was always explained to me as a DCE-DTE issue.
NICs = DTE
Hubs and switches = DCE
DCE<-->DTE = ok
DTE<-->DTE = crossover required, as in doing two PC's, or two router
ethernets, back to back
DCE<-->DCE = crossover required, as on switch to switch or hub to hub or
swi
To bring this into a Cisco type context ( i.e. Design )
Recall that in any project, the cost of the hardware is probably your least
expensive project component. There is the cost of software, installation,
configuration, training, and maintenance.
Especially when implementing new and leading edg
Title: RE: 2610 csu/dsu configuration
Don, I
believe that a CSU is a layer one device. I have never seen any option on any
CSU I have ever worked with, internal or external, for line encapsulation. It is
always AMI / B8ZS and SF / ESF choices.
on the
router interface is where you configure
various media, including ATM at 4470
Learn something every day.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 8:29 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Fast Ethernet MTU Size
Hi Chuck,
I'm no
Making some of these conversations strained. I sure hope it comes up to a
reasonable speed soon.
Paul, if we take up a collection, would that help fix whatever ails? How
much do you need?
Chuck
--
I am Locutus, a CCIE Lab Proctor. Xx_Brain_dumps_xX are futile. Your life as
it
Well. To beat this horse to death, the DCE / DTE terminology comes from a
different era, and out of the telephone world.
DTE = date terminal equipment
DCE = data circuit equipment ( well, that's what it's called in some books.
others call it data circuit-termination equipment )
DCE is a device
Rules of the game: I trust you mean that you must remember to delete the
file from the PC you are using prior to leaving. I.e. you can't leave it for
the next person to find. Correct?
I have received tips such as Tony's from other sources. If you check my
feeble web site www.chuck.to/CCIEAdvice.t
Rats...
About the only GOOD habit I have is frequent saving of open files.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: James Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 8:27 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: Tony Olzak; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Speed Tip
Saw this one on the NANOG list, beginning yesterday. Somewhere between
indirectly and critical, the issue effects capacity planning, particularly
for those working on VPN solutions for employers or customers. Thought some
of you might enjoy reading it. Also, you may want to follow the thread on
t
Saw this one on NANOG this morning. For those in the Design track, or who
are in the process of designing "reliable" and "redundant" networks for
employers or clients, I thought you might enjoy reading this one.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul, how necessary is it for you to be in the same physical location as the
server? In other words, if you are co-locating the server now, is the issue
the cost of co-locating with a provider who provides better bandwidth and
service?
Or do you have a DSL line into your home, and are you running
Gang, please forgive me for bringing this to the list. But I am having a
major problem with my household configuration, and I am hoping that you good
people can show me where my mistakes are.
Following is the configuration in question:
Process Home
Wife 1 (she is, after all, number one in my bo
Sam, the first place to start your preparation is on CCO www.cisco.com
Follow the links to certification, and eventually CCIE certification.
Everything you need to know to begin the process can be found there. This
included suggested reading, description of the process, and suggested
preparation
Under the loopback interface, you may issue the command ip ospf network
point-to-point
Cisco's implementation by default advertises loopbacks as host routes
( /32 )
By implementing the network type point-to-point, you cause the IOS to
advertise a loopback as a full network, as defined by the sub
use
route maps and policy routing
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Perry LucasSent:
Monday, December 04, 2000 11:18 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Help with Access
List
Here is the scenario...
A 2600 series router i
http://www.allnetllc.net/chat/ciscochat.htm
I was going to point to the Groupstudy chat room, but it appears to no
longer be there :-<
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 1:32 PM
To:
May I take a stab, recognizing my experience here is limited to my reading.
Original questions:
1. If 172.1.1.1 is down, can the traffic sourced by 172.16.0.0 will be
routed, or it would be drop?
CL: I don't know. My guess is the traffic would be black-holed. Same as if,
in the regular routing
Policy routing
( I'm starting to act like Jamie Q :-> anybody heard from that guy lately? )
Seriously, having recently discovered policy routing, I have become quite
interested in the possibilities. Check out the policy routing sections of
Jeff Doyle's TCP Routing, or Caslow's book, or Slattery'
Are the loopback addresses being advertised throughout your OSPF domain?
Or to put it another way, how would a remote router know how to route a
packet to a network not advertised?
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Christophe
My wife and I have truly enjoyed this bit of frivolity. Thanks to all of you
for contributing your wit to this frivolous thread
As always, it's a pleasure.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Sunday, Dec
Dear Miss Groupstudy Manners,
I have the privilege and good fortune of attending a meeting at which
someone who is recognized as one of the top people in the field, and author
of a well received book on the subject, will also be in attendance.
My question is this: is it considered rude, not to m
The Certification Zone exams are notoriously MORE difficult than the real
thing. I don't think I got more than 600 or so on any of the practice tests
I took, and it wasn't even close on my real thing.
One has to take the Czone tests with the attitude that you are practicing
thinking. You are prac
Hahahahahahaha!1
I've actually read both of these RFC's. Sure serves somebody right!
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Eddie Parra
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:39 PM
To: Cisco Group Study; CCIE Lab Group Stud
Idle curiosity, friends. Which RFC's are you reading?
I've read 1771 ( BGP4 ) and I am presently going through 1812 ( requirements
for IP routers )
1812 references a number of other RFC's, of which perhaps 1112 ( ICMP ) and
1256 ( ICMP Router Discovery Messages, 1120 ( requirements for internet
Hey, everyone, I've cleaned up my CCIE Lab preparation advice file, adding
some thoughts from some folks who recently passed ( with their permission,
of course. )
Check it out on my web site
www.chuck.to/CCIEAdvice.htm
Chuck
--
I am Locutus, a CCIE Lab Proctor. Xx_Brain_dump
As part of some research I have been doing to address some issues I have
with a particular customer security design, I've been spending a bit of time
at www.trusecure.com , and the related interests Information Security
Magazine and the ICSA test labs.
What I have read there leads me to believe t
Anyone know who OEM's for HP? Long ago is was Kalpana.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Petra Hofmann
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [RE: Cisco vs. HP Switches]
According to this afternoon's Bates Report, there are over 95,000 routes
being advertised across the internet, at least from the vantage point of the
gentleman doing the reporting.
I bring this up because a week ago, the reporter saw 93,000 routes.
Historically, in September 1996 there were abou
I have put together a few thoughts about motivation and preparation. I am
currently using this method for my CCIE Lab preparation. I have used the
techniques successfully for my lower level certifications, and in various
other parts of my life. I have shared this advice privately with some of
you.
Yes it can. Assuming appropriate crossover cable and addressing of the link.
Idle curiosity. Recognizing that RIP updates will be sent out any interface
whose address has been entered into the RIP networking process, what would
lead you to believe it would not work as expected?
Experiment - set
Actually, this topic came up a couple of months ago. Someone who was highly
experienced in networking and Cisco in particular failed the written twice.
He reported to the group that the passing mark was based in significant part
on the answers one gave in the survey before the test. The better you
To be fair, Cisco is a sales organization, and the incentive is to sell you
something, the more expensive the better. ;->
I personally know of two high schools, each with fewer than 500 end
stations, where Cisco has sold 6509's. The price was outstanding. And it's
not real money, but something c
Jen, I see your point. I just finished a quick read of RFC 896 (Congestion
Control in IP/TCP Internetworks)
Recognizing that TCP is responsible for end to end reliable data
communications, it would seem reasonable to think that the Nagle service
should not effect transit traffic.
On the other ha
ODR came out in 11.2, according to CCO. It is covered in Doyle.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Eddie Parra
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 1:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: What can CDP
Actually its done on butterfly ballots, then machine counted, then hand
counted, then hand counted again, this time looking for dimples. Next the
court orders another examination of your answer sheet, this time with the
purpose of divining how you intended to answer on all those questions you
may
My employer has sold a number of these kinds of solutions.
Keep in mind that data flow drives your bandwidth decisions. If your data
flow will not be disrupted or impaired by the asymmetric nature of DSL, then
go for it.
One solution that I have come to believe is quite suitable for any number o
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_4_2/config/v
lans.htm
a simple search on CCO using VTP as the key yield a number of hits, of which
this was the first. Appears to be a good place to start.
Best wishes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
Just sitting around eating some chicken, catching up on my e-mail. I see in
the Tony Bates CIDR report to the NANOG list there is a reference to
"interesting aggregations".
http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html#Aggs
Thought some excerpts might make an interesting challenge. To whit,
You may want to look into third party server-based products that monitor web
traffic, and then, based on policy, assist in blocking access to sites not
permitted. There are two or three of these companies that I saw at
Networkers, but the only name I can remember is WebSecure.
Literally, it is ge
Ask your DSL carrier what products they support. This may take a couple of
phone calls and a lot of persistence. Carriers usually have a preferred
product they push. But if you persist, you can get a list of several
manufacturers and models that the carrier will support on their network.
Anything
OK. No one else has nibbled. And as everyone knows, I'm not afraid to make a
fool of myself publicly.
So here goes..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 9:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
Jennifer, the question intrigued me enough to want to try a Q&D lab. I was
originally going to suggest RFC 1812 ( which I just finished browsing ) but
I could locate the section that I thought might have been relevant. I
believe, though, that the practices laid out in 1812 require that a router
ge
XWindows to connect to a router?
Well don't forget Telnet runs on top of TCP too.
Priscilla
>JMcL
>
>
>
>"Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 15/12/2000
05:29:54
>pm
>
>Please respond to "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
&
255.255.255.255 will not be passed by a router. it remains on a local
segment. All hosts will act upon that address, using CPU time to pass the
packets up the stack.
224.0.0.1 is the all systems multicast group. Only those devices which are
members of the particular multicast group will take pac
Surprise!
Just had this conversation with a customer the other day. They are buying a
new switch, but want to keep the old one on line to be the backup / failover
for their single NIC servers. How do they do this?
1) Windoze servers, anyway, require different IP subnets on each NIC in the
server
Betcha you can on SOME of Cisco's tests. SO FAR! ;->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Bharat Suneja
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: bscn
No, you cannot mark or review answers
Personally, I just blame it on buggy windoze software, and tell the help
desk techs to blow away the machines and reinstall the OS ;->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 10:17 PM
To: Todd Plambec
At the time I took them, the CID and the CCIE R&S written allowed one to
mark and review.
-Original Message-
From: Bharat Suneja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 10:53 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: bscn
Thanks
Hhh. I'm looking at my calendar.. did I sleep through
Christmas, and now it's April 1? Eeekkk!!! My lab us just a week away!
I'll never talk, copper! Beat me, tickle me, make me read Cisco Press books!
I still won't tell you!
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
FYI Knowledge Net appears to be the new name of Smartforce, a company that
makes a lot of CBT's for lots of different certifications.
The Knowledge Net home page carries the Cisco logo and claims it is a Cisco
training partner. I never had any contact with the senior management of the
firm, but I
This one just came across on the NANOG list. All you firewall and access
list jockeys may want to keep an eye open...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Edward S. Marshall
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 7:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I don't know if this helps or not, but I just received my study package from
Mentor Tech for the ECP1 class I will be taking next March.
The study pack consists of Caslow's book ( first edition ) Slattery's book
second edition ) and a one page syllabus fort reading assignments.
( And no I am no
Hey Leigh Anne!
Wonder if they are going after the IETF for publishing all those pesky RFC's
that disclose information necessary to the passing of the CCIE?
Think maybe Cisco will stop publishing their street addresses? And sue the
directory and map services that provide information on how to ge
Got this one in the mail today:
Dear Charles Larrieu,
You WERE scheduled to take the CCIE Routing and Switching lab in San_Jose on
April 7 2001.
I have removed you from the San_Jose schedule.
-
Wonder if it has anything to do with last night's DC Cisco Meeting? Guess
the
I'd like to answer your questions, but I'm afraid that if I did I would hit
Cisco's radar screen, and become a topic of conversation at last night's DC
Cisco meeting. ;->
Ah, what the hell... no the passing score does not increase with each try.
The published exam blueprint is accurate, if memo
And the logic is?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of dre
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Looking for some logic here..
spanning tree root bridge - lowest priority (default 327
OK, I think I can try this one again.
Through the magic of the internet, I believe I have the means of setting up
my lab pod for some live VPN over the internet instruction.
Weds. December 27, 5:00 p.m. Pacific, 8:00 p.m. eastern. I believe that
comes out to 1:00 a.m. Thursday December 27 GMT (
I failed the CID first time through, passed it second time. On both tests
there was a particular question, which fell into a "security" category ( in
my mind anyway ) There were 3 wrong answers and one right answer. I will go
to my grave convinced that there is an error on the test, and the real
Since the question comes up here periodically, I thought I'd pass along this
blurb from Cisco. The feature requires a CCO login.
Haven't fooled too much with it. But it appears, on the surface, to be quite
helpful. Link is towards the bottom.
Cisco Fe
Hello! Chuck Larrieu has just sent you a greeting card from Bluemountain.com.
You can pick up your personal message here:
http://www1.bluemountain.com/cards/boxa223547n6/fpkpn2br9me3fb.html
Your card will be available for the next 90 days
This service is 100% FREE! :) Have a good day and have
As a bit of a follow up, I've played with this one a bit now. Slow as
molasses in Minnesota in the wintertime, but if one is patient, it can be
quite interesting.
--
If you're a Cisco.com registered user, try out the Cisco
Feature Navigator tool today from the TAC Web site's
I presume you mean "gracefully shut down" as opposed to "turn off the
switch" or "pull the plug" ;->
Let he who has never done either of the latter cast the first stone..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
netlinesys
Sent: Friday,
Comments within:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:frame-relay
I have spent many hours trying to comprehend the exerpt bellow (from C
1 - 100 of 1355 matches
Mail list logo
