Before providing an answer, let me ask:
What do you think? Why?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Lupi, Guy
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:OSPF [7:5808]
When a router has OSPF con
as
participating in the routing process anyway. Also, I could see it as a
possible security risk, you are sending hellos down links, and anyone would
be able to see that you are running a routing protocol. Did I hit the mark
or am I way off?
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto
This of course presumes it is in Cisco's interest to make the test
"relevant".
Reminds a bit of the arguments we used to make in college and grad school.
My major is X, so why should I be required to take classes in Y? The answer
is BECAUSE! :->
Right or wrong, relevant or not, the fact is that
As someone who has devoted a bit of time and more than a couple of dollars
pursuing certification, and as someone who has failed one lab attempt, and
as someone who collects good advice from CCIE's and others, I can no longer
resist opening my big mouth on this.
The CCIE Lab exam is a test. Nothi
address and
> > > >gateway.
> > > >
> > > >Dean Whitley
> > > >
> > > >-Original Message-
> > > >From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:32 AM
> > > >To: [EMAI
OK. I'll correct you.
Consider the situation where you have a router with multiple T1's ( not
frame relay ) and therefore multiple interfaces. The design might be such
that I see a destination to network X through more than one interface.
NetX--R_1--R_2-R_3
No matter wha
I believe you need a tunnel mode command in there under the tunnel interface
Int tun 0
Tun mode ipip
For example
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Eduardo D Piovesam
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
ault gateway. The
> > > > router with proxy arp will
> > > > >answer as the default gateways mac address. Then
> > > > using a wide scope for nat
> > > > >(the scope would be the entire ip address range)
> > > > the hotel can provid
Have you tried reloading the router with the cable attached?
Or blowing away the X.35 config, reloading with the cable attached, then
putting in the X.25
What version of IOS are you running? I have documented a couple of problems
revolving around serial port cables with 12.0.4 or so.
Chuck
---
Gee, is it time to repeat my observation that the firewall is no longer the
appropriate device for doing this kind of stuff.? What happens when some
user or group has a valid business reason to use instant messenger or real
audio? Now how to distinguish between the valid and non-valid uses and
us
bles attached and it worked
..
thanks for the help but what could be the reason for that if i know it will
be a help .
Arun Sharma
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Have you tried reloading the router with the
Ever wonder what the CCIE candidates talk about on the CCIE list?
The following message came through today. I thought the bright folks on this
list might be curious, and might want to venture an answer.
Begin original question:
Guys,
I wonder if there is anybody who remembers the discussion on
Question came up on the CCIE group revolving around the meaning of the term
"tunnel"
I think I am seeing where the author of the below quote is going. I'm
wondering if one of the folks on this group might be willing to offer some
insight.
The question originated with someone calling an OSPF virt
Did some more research. In the context of the question, I went to the RFC to
see what the source says. It occurred to me that the behaviour of virtual
links must be defined in there somewhere.
Sure enough, in the router LSA there is something called the V bit, which
when set determines that the o
n the same way you and I do. I'm sure he's made a
mistake or two in his life. There are a few pages of errata to be found for
his book. :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Peter I. Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 10:52 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Lots of free stuff at www.cisco.com
Check out the command references and configuration guides. Great place to
start.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
vijay tyagi
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 10:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
When you swap to frame relay, do you use map statements art the branch
offices?
BTW, I wasn't aware that the 16xx series supported ATM, can't verify this on
the IOS feature navigator found at:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/FeatureNav/FN.pl
which IOS version you running? I have a couple o
IE? Try This One [7:6076]
> >
> >
> > Chuck- my answer is Yes. The traffic from the Virtual Linked psuedo-ABR
> > passes back to Area 0, before it's sent onto the intended Area (even if
> it's
> > directly connected).
> >
> > Phil
> >
> &
Set up an OSPF virtual link across it ;->
Chuck
(A joking reference to a recent thread.)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Rashid Lohiya
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Why use GRE Tunn
There have been a couple of very good threads here the last couple of days -
the kind that make you think, make you hit the books or the rfc's or the
archives or the net. The kind that challenge you to learn a little bit more
and walk away a little bit smarter.
It continues to be a privilege to b
If you enable IPX routing, and have IPX network numbers on your various
router interfaces, or have IPX protocol stacks on your PC's then yes you can
ping mac addresses from a Cisco router. recall that in the world of IPX the
mac is the host portion of an IPX address.
I won't say that it's fun or
Hhh... Not so sure this is exactly right..
With full duplex, you have effectively created two "directions" --- there
and back.
I believe it is accurate to say that only one packet can be on the wire per
direction at one time.
I can send to you at the same time you are sending to me.
e simultaneous
> conversations. Under the right conditions, you could fill up
> virtually any pipe, but unless your traffic demands are really
> outlandish, you probably won't. If you do, you should examine the
> reasons, and revise the design of your network accordingly
since this appears to be a regular occurrence, you may want to save this
link.
best wishes
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
William Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:help
Of course it helps if the #$^% list doesn't eat the url:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_2500.html
sorry
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:34 PM
To: [
Knowing others will give you a succinct answer, I would also suggest you can
take a peek at RFC 1541
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1541.txt
for some details, such as the DHCP request packet format. In there you will
find a field defined as giaddr ( Relay agent IP address, used in booting
via a
It depends. If your ISP is routing to you, then you need an ip address. If
they are bridging, you probably should do it another way. I've used a
virtual bridge interface in these situations, and put the ip address on the
BVI.
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt
A comment or two within:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Jeroen Timmer
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Weird DHCP/VLAN solution suggestions wanted!! [7:6579]
We have a configuration
Asked because I don't know: how do you plan on making the switches
redundant? How are your servers, for example homed on the switches? Is it
real redundancy if closet switches are dual homed to core switches? Is your
internet connection, your firewall, etc dual homed as well?
Chuck
The world is
You can't be having a cat get together without Pamela Forsythe's
involvement. :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: T-shirt W
Might want to take a look at this link. courtesy of Adam Quiggle, who used
to spend a lot of time here.
http://home.nc.rr.com/quiggle/ConfigReg.xls
CCIE candidates, anyway, should be familiar with the config register values.
Manipulating them can provide one part of a router security program.
January 2000
Love my new job here in Silicon Valley.
My salary is 30% higher!
I have stock options!
The temperature outside is 65F in winter!
California is the best place on earth!!!
Sure glad I moved out here.
February
Still looking for an apartment.
Freeways everywhere to
I am reading Doug Comer's excellent book Internetworking with TCP/IP vol 1.
Highly recommended, and I wish I had followed the good advice of several
other people on this list, and read the book a year ago.
I have a question on sliding windows as Comer describes it: "The TCP sliding
window mechani
S=2134278641, L=0, A= 2821709
10 Server MyPCTCP HTTPS=2134278641, L= 156, A= 2821709
11 MyPCServer TCP HTTP S= 2821709, L=0, A=2134278797
Priscilla
At 02:10 PM 6/2/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>I am reading Doug Comer's excellent
If memory serves ( always a question in my case ) the facility was called
Pburst, ( maybe pburst.nlm? ) and was one of those things that got blamed
for a lot of problems on Novell servers. Almost the first words out of any
NetWare engineer's mouth were "have you disabled packet burst?"
-Origi
with regards to the contents of the exam, I am reminded of the time I told
my son that when I was his age I could name all the presidents of the
IUnited States, to which he answered "there were only 5 or six of them back
then" :->
with regards to the value of the CCIE, whatever that may be, like
RIP v1 can optionally support host routes ( /32 ) according to the RFC
(ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1058.txt ) this is an optional
implementation. Cisco has chosen to support host routes, if my own
experiments are accurate. You might want to try a couple of scenarios to
verify.
One more thing
Saw this one on NANOG this morning. Thought it was interesting. Obviously,
the person who posted it considered it as stating the obvious. ;->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Craig A. Haney
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:55 AM
Got to thinking about this after seeing some of the recent posts on the CCIE
list asking how to do or show various things.
What are the necessary informational commands one SHOULD know, not just for
the Lab, but for operations in general? For example ( short list )
Show protocol
Show IP protocol
Idle curiousity - are you getting true "packet by packet" load sharing? Or
conversation by conversation?
i.e. is your traffic balance 50-50 ( for two lines )? Or some other figure,
because traffic for particular destinations is dent out particular links due
to the route caching?
Chuck
-Orig
Once again, I offer the following. Need a CCO login to use it, but it is
very helpful in discussions like this.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/FeatureNav/FN.pl
According to the IOS feature navigator, ISL VLAN routing is now available on
the 17xx platform with IOS 12.2.1 releases.
I came up
s and hardware devices as it does. Still
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:05 AM
To: Circusnuts; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: low-end router that does inter-VLAN routing [7:7256]
Once again, I offe
Which means...?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sam
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Layer3 switch vs Router [7:7406]
One differance is that a layer 3 switch does wire-speed switchi
I'm having trouble deciding - is this a smart ass remark? That link
certainly makes it seem so. :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Munoz, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
about being a night club comic.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Munoz, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:26 PM
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Layer3 switch vs Router [7:7406]
Seriously? I did not mean to come acr
I am basing my reply upon continuous study of Howard's posts.
BGP is properly categorized as a path vector protocol. It is not limited in
terms of hop counts in the sense that RIP, RIPv2, or IGRP are limited, nor
is it concerned with bandwidth and cost, as OSPF and EIGRP.
BGP is concerned with 1
Amazing. three clicks and a couple of scroll downs and voila!
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html
according to this link, as of April 30 there were... well, I'll let you
discover for yourself.
As for the most recent number issued, that changes on a daily bas
Very good, and thanks.
But... to quote a sage, who made this point last time this topic came up,
what exactly is the difference between a router that routes 100,000 packets
per second, and a layer three switch that switches 100,000 packets per
second?
Cisco can talk about ASIC's versus processor
So layer three switches are faster, 'eh? By orders of magnitude, 'eh? This
calls for a bit of research on CCO.
Hhhmmm
Catalyst 8500 = 24 million PPS
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca8500c.htm#CJAEJHDF
Catalyst 6509 = 170 million PPS
http://www.cisco.com/univerc
Got a link to substantiate that claim?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sam
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Layer3 switch vs Router [7:7406]
True, routers can handle a 100,000 packe
ayer switching integrates the
best of routing and switching to provide better performance.. and I
think my point has been proven.
I wish I could log into CCO =(
Mike W.
"Chuck Larrieu" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> So layer three switche
For some reason the name "Grand Junction" comes up.
I don't know, but I was eavesdropping on a conversation yesterday, and I
heard someone say that Grand Junction was by far Cisco's most successful
acquisition. 2+2=Catalyst :->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Just got this on the TAC newsletter. Requires a CCO login.
The Cisco IP Telephony Readiness Assessment can be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/tac/iptelready
(available to registered users)
( not bad - e-mail function was broken when I tried it the other day )
The Cisco IP Telephony Solution Guid
To throw in a couple of cents on this topic, my recollection is that the
CCIE written was in many ways similar to the CID exam, but with the added
emphasis on token ring and RIF's.
My own recommendation would be to use your CID materials for the desktop
stuff, download the white papers found on C
On a 7200 router, the only IMA available is the 8 port variety PA-A3-8T1IMA,
if memory serves.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of tcb
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Weird Scenario ques
Not meant to be sarcastic, but how many hosts in any network, VLAN or
otherwise? Answer is "it depends" ;->
I have a question for you folks who use VLAN's extensively. Do you establish
membership by geography ( floors, parts of floors, buildings, etc ) or by
function ( accounting, sales, engineer
Oft overlooked in the preparation process - good points all, PO.
One other thing - Vlabs are timed, so there is pressure to complete the work
quickly. Preparation and planning are very important. It is never too early
to practice speedy, correct configuration of routers.
Chuck
-Original Me
Not that I think this particular offer is legit, but there are many of these
kinds of "professional watcher" kinds of newsletters out there, and they
are of similar size and not cheap. Stewart Alsop, former editor of Infoworld
Magazine, once published such a letter centered around IBM computing.
Yes there is
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/c_and_s/
for many things, one may substitute the word "public" for "customer"
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Monday, June 11, 200
It occurred to me that everything you want to know is on CCO. The problem as
always is how to find it. One of the required CCIE skill sets is ability to
find information on the document CD, of which there is an on-line version
at: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/home/home.htm
First place to check i
>From where to where?
BGP requires an existing route to it's neighbor peers. These routes may be
static, but may not be the quad zero default route ( 0.0.0.0 )
So you do not need to run an IGP between your router and your ISP's router,
for example.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAI
The world is a single point of failure. :->
Seriously, something often overlooked - the ISP's themselves, their
backbones, their peering.
Not too long ago, up in the Sacramento area, some folks found out the hard
way that even though they were dual homed, both ISP's used the same backbone
provid
Correction - www.ccbootcamp.com
Cisco's lawyers forced the change.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Raul
F. Fernandez-IGLOU
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: What is the Lab 'like'?
Congratulations on passing!
However, it is wise to distinguish between Cisco's answers and the Truth :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
William E. Gragido
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
If you haven't done so already, get yourself a subscription to Certification
zone www.certificationzone.com
Check out the white paper by David Wolsefer on this topic.
Also, check out the networkers presentation on the Lab ( rats - I can't find
the link - check out the archives. Jenny McCloud pos
One place to look is Darren Spohn's Data Network Design, if you can find a
copy. I bough one used through Amazon, and at that time there were a few
more copies available. I have it on good authority that an new edition is on
it's way ;->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 6:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: ARP and TCP/IP layering [7:8335]
I'm simultaneously amused and confused by some of the debates on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: LLC Type 2 [7:8262]
VMS books were orange, as I recall!?
Or maybe you are thinking of the conver
: Friday, June 15, 2001 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: ARP and TCP/IP layering [7:8335]
Comments inline
>>> "Chuck Larrieu" 6/15/01 1:04:26 PM >>>
>At 11:50 AM 6/13/01, John Neiberger wrote:
>>This topic has
Questions keep coming: what to believe and why?
Brought to mind something I found on CCO once. The topic was the maximum
network diameter of an EIGRP network. The following is a quote from CCO:
IP Enhanced IGRP provides the following features:
(snip)
Increased network width. With IP RIP, the lar
Earlier today someone was asking.
The following link will get you to the Cisco networkers presentation on CCIE
prep.
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw00/pres/3304/3304.htm
( courtesy of Jenny McLeod )
I also recommend David Wolsefer's white paper on the subject, found at
www.certificationzone.
For internal use only, you may want to look into f-secure
http://www.fsecure.com/
Theirs is a user level encryption - i.e. files on hard drives and server
drives are encrypted. They have a wide range of products. Obviously, files
would have to be decrypted prior to sending to non f-secure users ;
This site has it's good and bad points. Searching by word or phrase can
indeed help locate things more easily, but it can work against you.
For example, I did a search on "ARP" and got 60 hits. Not one of which had
the RFC title. The index page gives RFC numbers, but again no titles.
So for the
A well known trick of evil lab proctors making for fewer CCIE's in this
world :->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Config Regis
You bad boys and girls should read and save my posts. Lots of good
information.
http://home.nc.rr.com/quiggle/ConfigReg.xls
courtesy of Adam Quiggle
the console port speed is determined by the values of two bit positions in
the config register. Convert from hex to binary. Bits 11 and 12 from the
it's all over the CCIE list. Cisco is going to a one day lab. Speculation is
that they are eliminating all the B.S. and C.S. stuff. Some of us are
guessing that a candidate will walk into a router/switch pod that is
preconfigured with the basic stuff, and that to prove your CCIExpertise, you
will
Following is a major excerpt from the e-mail sent from Cisco. As you can
see, the tack taken is that those on the CCNA/CCNP track should already have
skills that are currently covered in the CCIE lab.
It's no secret, and everyone who has been through the Lab will agree, that
there are certain tas
This is not meant as a negative to the poster, but as food for thought.
Does any business really want to take something as important as their
telephone system and rip it out and put VoIP in? Without planning? Without
having a couple of vendors come in and offer proposals? Without at least
going t
Here are a couple of links for you.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/elhw__g1.htm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/general/qrg/eol_ai.htm
generally, Cisco announces end of life, and publishes a time frame for end
of sale of product, spare parts, and support. They do so in order t
A couple of questions / thoughts
In the scenario mentioned, is an area zero really necessary? I.e. why not
throw all routers into a singe area, whatever it's name? In hub and spoke,
all inter-spoke traffic will have to go through the hub anyway, no matter
what the protocol.
Another thing to keep
Cut and paste to and from a text editor. Keep the text files for reference.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
NP-BASS LEON
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 7:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Pix command confusion
My recollection is that conduits are discrete, and can be edited, added,
removed, without effecting other conduit entries. Unlike access-lists, where
there is an implied "deny all" at the end.
The reason is that on a PIX, or any good fire wall, everything is denied
unless explicitly permitted. Th
John, this one's got me to thinking a little bit. Your kinda right but kinda
wrong.
The areas are an OSPF structure, used for the building of the SPF tables.
It's not that inter area traffic has to go through a discreet area 0, but
that in OSPF in order for an area to learn about routes to anothe
This one has it's merits:
News.groupstudy.com :->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of wang
zhimin
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:please show me some newsgroup [7:9476]
Hi,would you sho
There is a very good chapter on subnetting / addressing in Clare Gough's
ACRC Exam Certification Guide ( Cisco Press )
Her approach is hierarchical. Region - campus - building - floor - hosts
She then takes a subnet out of the appropriate level, and uses that for the
WAN connection numbering.
E
interarea traffic must cross an area zero
link.
Does that sounds about right? :-)
>>> "Chuck Larrieu" 6/21/01 11:15:31 PM >>>
John, this one's got me to thinking a little bit. Your kinda right but
kinda
wrong.
The areas are an OSPF structure, used for the building of
This may or may not be an error. It is possible that some prankster has
renamed your router to Router(boot)>
Hostname Router
If you type a question mark ( help ) ? do you get the boot menu, or do you
get a full set of commands?
Have you tried to enter an enable to see if you can get to privileg
>>(not that this has anything at all to do with cisco..but
anyway.)
my first thought was a NAT / NAT overload issue. Depending upon how the DSL
router in question works, is there one more PC than outside nattable
addresses available?
My other thought was improper machine configuration, as you s
On the other hand, it may well be that you have no flash chips in the
router. I see no evidence of an IOS. 2 meg DRAM? You didn't buy this on a
street corner from a guy wearing asbestos gloves, did you? ;->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
can't use an ethernet patch cord. need a rollover cable - pins 1 and 8
reversed.
look here:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/distrdir/dd2501/pin.ht
m
watch the wrap
for the Cisco cable pinouts ( note there is a type on the pinout chart )
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message--
It should be fairly obvious that someone succumbed to the temptation of
opening an e-mail attachment from an untrusted source - one of those VBS
worms - and is the source of al this mail.
http://www.trusecure.com/html/news/press/2001/050901homepageworm.shtml
watch the wrap
these things can get i
ip route a.b.c.d w.x.y.z dentination.address distance ( higher than the
distance of the routing protocol in question )
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r
/iprprt2/1rdindep.htm#xtocid279708
definitely watch the word wrap
make sense?
Chuck
-Original
substitute "public" for "customer" in the link
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/7400rt/prodlit/asrgw_an.htm
this is true for much of CCO
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 6
in Terry Slattery's book Advanced IP Routing in Cisco Networks ( 2nd
edition - I don't recall the discussion in the first edition ) thee is a
discussion about bandwidth requirements in conjunction with TCP sliding
windows. pages 47ff. might want to check that out.
anecdotal evidence abounds that
got a good one for all of you.
I'm working on a major sale, involving multiple 75xx routers. I hope I hope
I hope, because the bonus for this one would be nice indeed.
in any case, for the 75xx platform Cisco offers the GEIP and the GEIP+
cards.
What's the difference?
http://www.cisco.com/warp
it's kinda like a "doohickey" but not nearly as high end as a
"thingamajiggy"
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jack Nalbandian
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128
Is that a layer 2 or 3?
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Jack Nalbandian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
it's kinda like a "doohickey" but not nearly
it's a full slot card - does not use the VIP
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 2:24 PM
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco gigabit cards - 75xx platform [7:10158]
I take it th
I know the legend, and I know what Kubric himself said in an interview.
As for which is true? beats me!
Chuck
old enough to actually remember some of this stuff
old enough to remember when 2001 was a date movie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Beha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
>These things have little intelligence. They are just doohickeys. They are
>also cal
501 - 600 of 1355 matches
Mail list logo
