I'd check for a full-duplex setting on switchports connected to
half-duplex devices. This would allow better performance going to the
users than coming from the users. However, it still wouldn't be great.
John
>>> "Richard Tufaro" 7/9/02 8:38:57 AM >>>
**
visit http://www.solution6.com
visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants.
UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
*
This email message
.
If there is another site/website/listserv that would help please direct
me. Thank you
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48358&t=48358
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groups
the person lied about
their experience.
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146 (R/S, Security)
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Chuck"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> &
r own labs. Generally you will find that its not worth saving
the few hundred bucks to do all that work on your own.
I would suggest pursuing either Checkpoint or Cisco first. I would go for
whatever is used more at your daily job. Keep in mind there are a LOT more
resources for Cisco than Checkpoint.
Jo
Chuck I would love either copy. Thanks!
Let me know if I win.
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48242&t=48224
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.htm
u are coming
straight from high school.
http://www.isc2.org/cgi/content.cgi?category=18
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146 (R/S, Security)
""Jarred Nicholls"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If there are any CISSP certified professionals out
u are coming
straight from high school.
http://www.isc2.org/cgi/content.cgi?category=18
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146 (R/S, Security)
""Jarred Nicholls"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If there are any CISSP certified professionals out
u are coming
straight from high school.
http://www.isc2.org/cgi/content.cgi?category=18
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146 (R/S, Security)
""Jarred Nicholls"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If there are any CISSP certified professionals out
Morgan,
I too know what you are thinking about this whole industry. I got my CCNA in
2000 and now I am one test away from the CCNP (Support exam) doing the
self-study route/home lab. I was lucky enough to work for a major networking
company that allowed me to get my start on routers and then mov
I don't know how much it relates directly to the exam you're referring
to, but Integrating Voice and Data Networks by Scott Keaggy is one of
the best books I've found on the subject. I would *highly* recommend
it.
Regards,
John
>>> "Bolton, Travis D" 7/5/02 8
Congratulations!
>>> "Morgan Hansen" 7/5/02 4:37:49 AM >>>
HURRAY Hahaha:-)
Just got back from my CCNA exam dear friends, and wouldnt you know
With help from you guys, I managed to ace the test!!! :-) :-) :-) :-)
:-)
Without help from you all (Chuck, you know your among them right
Dan,
Congrats! I am starting to read the support books and plan to take it in Aug
sometime. Thanks for the warning about the test, anything else you could
provide offline without break of NDA is appreciated.
:-}
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48057&t=48035
-
yes you can
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47957&t=47936
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROT
muhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47935&t=47925
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nond
Isn't enable password just the older form of enable
secret?
Enable secret works over enable password. So if you
have an enable secret you do not need an enable
password.
--- Morgan Hansen wrote:
> Hi and thanx for all the input guys!
>
> 99 out of a 100 of you managed to give me this
>
You can encrypt passwords but you will need this statement in the
router/switch aside from the default secret password. The command is:
service password-encryption
Hope this helps and someone please correct me if Im wrong...Im learning
too... :o)
-JK
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy
f 24
smaller frames, how could this possibly be working??
Yowza...my head hurts.
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47844&t=47844
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/li
st
solution and doesn't require any changes to our existing code or
configurations. We simply plug the server into our existing load
balancing switch and, with a small tweak of that config, we're off and
running.
Any thoughts?
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.gro
Unless I'm not reading this right, they will support it til 2007.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/general/qrg/eol_ai.htm
""Dan Penn"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> No Rick that guy is MOST mistaken some of the 2500 series has been
> EOS'd. However cisco i
n the
interfaces doing the bridging. In my case I could just use "no ip routing"
(I never thought I would use that command on a live network), but you may
need something more granular like IRB. The Caslow book has some simple
explanations of IRB.
Sincerely,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
www.cisco.com
It is most certainly still supported and available if you have download
privileges. Did you even check?
""S M"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm looking for Cisco 2514 IOS w/ firewall feature set. Cisco doesn't
> supports 25xx series anymore.
>
The Cisco guys are saying that UUNet converted a lot of stuff to Juniper and
a few other vendors.
""Chuck"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Not too long ago, John Chambers was quoted in one of the networking
> magazines tal
Talking with a couple of my students (employees at Cisco) WCOM is mostly a
Nortel shop. They said that ATT and Sprint are Cisco Powered Networks so
they are the big providers that Cisco is interested in. This is not
official or anything from Cisco it's just what these guys are telling me.
""Ch
You forgot to post the NDA you agreed to before you started the test.
--
""Jerry Yu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I just failed the 305-001, but I remember the following tricky questions.
> pls. offer your opinion or answers to them.
>
>
> thanks.
>
> jyu
>
>
of are
> turning up any hits on google.
>
> Having just passed the CCIE security written exam this morning I may be
> interested in how to do this for my home lab.
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
>
> --On Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:37 PM -0400 John Kaberna
> wrote:
>
> >
Shahid is absolutely right. You do not need to go to training for this.
The MCNS, PIX, and VPN exams are pretty easy if you read the CP books and
have some experience with them. For IDS you can pass using just the Cisco
Press book if you have a good memory. You're better off getting an NT4
serv
You cannot filter using FQDN. You can use websense to block certain URL's
though.
""Mamoon Dawood"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear All,
>
> I the PIX firewall, Can I make an access list using the FQDN (eg:
> www.yahoo.com)
> instead of using IP address, s
I attended a Cisco Wireless update last month and came
out of it with this information.
Their updated WEP provides dynamic keys now. It is
still crackable, but by the time it is cracked the key
has regenerated.
Also the keys are no longer hard coded into the
device, since they are dynamic.
_
What about restricting DHCP based on MAC Address.
Problem is a lot more administration.
--- Patrick Donlon wrote:
> I've just found a wireless LAN set up by someone in
> the building, I found it
> by chance when I was checking something with a
> colleague from another dept.
> The WLAN has zero
This isn't quite true. For example, a DCE router interface will be
down/down if DTR is not raised by the DTE device. I see this quite
often at work and faulty cabling is generally not the culprit. It's
almost always bad hardware in the DTE.
John
Michael L. Williams wrote:
>
I had a customer that did the same thing you described on our 6509's with
only 1 sup eng (don't ask me why there was no redundancy - big mistake)that
were going into a PIX 510. The cfg is below, and what the standby group info
looked like. That was before they shut down and gave us good net guys t
ast
>and unicast, and don't consider multicasts.
Isn't it Cisco that requires the 'broadcast' keyword in many cases to
pass _multicast_ traffic? ;-)
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46931&t=46839
-
CCNP - Security has been retired.
They are trying to say that if you were a CCNP -
Specialist, you can upgrade to the CSS1
--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
wrote:
> I saw this under Cisco's Qualified Specialist
> website...
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/cqs/security/
>
are
quite small, but I can't seem to find them. I know that I can run IP/TV or a
similar big app but that is overkill and requires a lot of resources. Does
anybody have a URL for one to download, freeware preferably?
Thank you,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
Message Posted at:
I don't see why you'd get flamed for that except maybe from a die-hard Cisco
employee and even then I doubt it. I prefer Snort a lot more than Cisco's
IDS because of price and I do prefer the fact that you have nearly an entire
industry of security people that work on Snort. There are very few s
.
""John Kaberna"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> PIX's and routers capable of running IDS run a very limited version of
IDS.
> I believe they only catch 59 signatures which isn't very much. It's not
bad
> for a small
PIX's and routers capable of running IDS run a very limited version of IDS.
I believe they only catch 59 signatures which isn't very much. It's not bad
for a small company that has a PIX that would like to start down the path of
having a true IDS some day.
I'm not sure what you mean about Snort
CJ - I was interested to find out what type of lab you have. I have one
myself and wanted to know if I needed more or get rid of somethings that
aren't relevant.
I have 3-2501's, 1-Cat 5K, 1-AS5200, and 2-2900XL's
I heard they are removing TR and Cat 5K after 10/2002 but I won't be ready
fo
It's going to be replaced with more QoS and basic security stuff. No new
topics, just an expansion of existing topics that aren't covered in as much
detail.
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Michael Graham"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[E
It will be Ethernet only. No TR interfaces at al will be in the lab.
""Khalsa Singh"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks Ryan,
>
> I'm confused, so when cisco says, no token ring in the CCIE lab from oct
> 2002 but DLSW will be there, what does that mean. Sh
I've noticed that Netscape 4.78 is slow on our very fast Unix server, as
well. I believe that Netscape 6.0 is available from Sun. Perhaps you
should try that one to see if they've improved the speed.
>>> "Jason Owens" 6/13/02 11:15:13 AM >>>
IE 6.0
Patrick Donlon wrote:
>
> I've just started
In my experience, what you are seeing is correct. Every L1/L2 router sets
the ATT bit in its LSPs. The L1 router see this and chooses the router
with the lowest metric and ATT bit set as its default route. No
additional configuration should be required.
Hope this helps.
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Cisc
There is also a free lab #23 at www.ccbootcamp.com/download
lab23beta_configs.zip
lab23beta_preconfigs.zip
newhintslab23beta.doc
newlab23beta.doc
newlab23beta.vsd
""John Stamos"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Everyone,
What happens when the T1 provider goes down? Those IP's will no longer be
reachable and the servers will be down. Without BGP I don't see how you are
going to get the DSL circuit to take over the IP's that the T1 provider
advertises. Assuming you have BGP, I would thing that policy routing and
Yes, these have a boot mode of sorts that allows an xmodem update. Here
are the instructions for CBOS 2.3.5. I'm sure the instructions are
similar for other releases:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/dsl_prod/c600s/cbos/cbos230/cbo230rn.htm#xtocid2360917
HTH,
John
>&
You should be able to do exactly what you said as long as you have at least
2 public IP addresses. Use one for the interface and all regular users and
use the other IP for the two servers. Create two different nat and global
pairs.
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146 (R/S, Security)
NETCG Inc
Okay, I did find that there are a couple of FlexWAN bugs that are fixed
in this release. That demonstrates that I truly need more caffeine.
:-)
>>> "John Neiberger" 6/12/02 8:37:19 AM
>>>
I just don't get this. I'm looking at the IOS releases for the Ca
if there are no resolved caveats and no new features, why is there
an E4 release in the first place?? With no bug fixes and no new
features, how is E4 different than E3?
Okay, back to work
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
2611 if you want Ethernet and 2621 if you want Fast Ethernet. I generally
don't like to work with anything under a 2600. You can also look at the
1751. The problem with the 17XX series is they aren't rack mountable.
""Fab Perez"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Go to www.fatkid.com if you want free CCIE labs. You didn't specify what
kind of material you're looking for.
""John Stamos"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm new to the list and was wonder
Hi Everyone,
I'm new to the list and was wondering if there are any good websites that
offer free training material?
Thank you!
-John
-
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
Congrats dude! Keep on going till you get that CCNP!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46082&t=46067
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondis
How much free memory does this router have now?
>>> "Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555" 6/7/02 3:17:06
PM >>>
This one is taking full routes from UUNet and AT&T without any special
configuration.
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Version 12.1(5)T7,
If you aren't taking full routes from two providers, I believe that a
2650 with 128MB would be fine. A 2620 or lower would not be the
greatest choice. If you want to take full routes from two or more
providers, you will need at least 256MB of DRAM which forces you to pick
a different platform, l
Hello All,
I was talking to a Cisco CCIE this morning and he mentioned that an open
source cisco router simulator was somewhere on the internet for free
download. He believed it was called IUO or IOU or something similar...
supposedly it was developed to roiginally run on solaris boxes.
Anyone e
I am Nuclear Physicist by training. I specialized in gamma-ray spectroscopy.
When I started Boson, the only sub-atomic particle whose domain name was
available was Boson.com.
John Swartz, ccie, mcse, cne
Boson Software
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=459
tworking can at times!
2. Priscilla, please tell me you cut and paste that stuff from somewhere and
don't just reel it off from memory (e.g. the 10-step FTP process below). If
you do reel it off from memory, do you use some herbal memory supplement or
something?
-John
""Priscill
t use
two real phone lines :p
Thanks,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45692&t=45692
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report m
This may not be true. Do you have the ftp fixup
turned on?
The data stream no longer runs on just the standard
ftp data port. Unless you have it turned on, your pix
will see traffic it doesn't undersyamd and drop it.
--- question cisco wrote:
> i have a question regarding static routing and
>
This is saying that from the inside to the outside do
not translate the 216.119 network (they would stay the
same).
>From the outside, connection to the 216.119.X.240
address can come through the PIX and do not translate
the address.
There should be an ACL that goes with this as well
(outside t
Forward to me by a coworker, from the Shark Tank at ComputerWorld:
---
Shark Tank: And it's the prettiest little hub you ever saw
Business is booming for this manufacturer, so the production
management group decides to expand into some long
Thanks again to all for input.
"Remember, wherever you go - there you are".
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45536&t=45182
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.grou
On Oct 20, 7:01pm, "Chuck" wrote:
}
} Someone who passed the lab recently advised me ( as have other folks who
} have posted their success here and elsewhere ) that it remains CRITICAL
that
} you spend as much time as possible reading the command references as found
} on CCO. Print as much out a
On Oct 20, 5:38pm, "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote:
}
} Wendell covers Catalyst 1900 configuration in quite a bit of detail.
} Cisco's list of topics for 640-607 doesn't include this, so I'm not
} planning to teach it, and in fact, we won't have a switch in the lab
} probably. Will this be OK? D
Cool, thanks. I'd done this a bunch of 2620s in the past and I'd never
heard this before. Weird.
John
>>> "Scott Nawalaniec" 5/30/02 2:43:36 PM >>>
Hi John,
We just recently upgraded all of our 2620, 2621 and 2650 routers and
every
one of them and th
this? Should I be
worried? I'm about to ship these two routers out to two new branches
and I'd hate for them to die prematurely.
Thanks,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45457&t=45457
--
These MIBs are actually on the CSS itself. FTP to the box, navigate to
the mibs directory and then download whichever files you're looking for.
You'll need the apent.mib and then the svcext.mib if you want to
monitor services.
HTH,
John
>>> "Yaron E" 5/30/02
I came home today to find my score report for the routing beta I took in
March in the mail.
I passed with a 846.
I hope all find their beta score reports soon!
-John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45404&
Try Managing Cisco Network Security
--- David Armstrong wrote:
> I'm not sure either but this comes to mind:
> Mastering Certifications for New
> Students
>
>
> ""David Vital"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Gonna be sorry I asked this..but which test
HSRP
gateway as the next hop address. The only issue, and it was minor, was
making sure the customer's subnets were advertised to the Internet.
Sincerely,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
""Chuck"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> got to thin
Yeah, someone else busted me down on my comment. I checked with my friend,
and he had a 1720, not a 1750, and it wasn't new, so your observation about
the difference between the -0 and the -1 models may be what tripped me up.
Sincerely,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
""s vermill"
Is anyone on the Group Study news group interested in purchasing a CCIE kit
with the following:
4 * 2500 (full memory)
2 * 4000 plus all the interface cards and cables
Cost for all the equipment is $2500. Receipts available.
John M. Abruzzese
181 Fox Road Unit #222
Waltham, MA 02451
oks like a
bear!
John
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]
> "A CCIE is still the highest networking cert and the only one that is not
a
>
> paper cert. "
>
> I
3 down now just support and I'll join the ranks of a lot of you fellow
CCNP's. Any suggestions with Support exam, is it that tough compared to the
other three. Thanks in advance.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45182&t=45182
--
Grrr. I searched through the release notes here
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/1700/1751/175
1rlsn/index.htm
and could not find anything on trunking. Okay, new moral here: do multiple
searches with different keywords.
Sorry,
John
""M.C. van den
trunking, it is positioned to be a SOHO router. You will also notice that
there is no Enterprise image for a 17xx router, which also implies reduced
functionality.
My $0.02,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
""Alexander Kharkats"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EM
that in a production environment, but in a study lab it would be cool.
My $0.02,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
""TMS"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello
>
> Did 10/100 Ethernet interfaces build in above Cisco routers h
Cisco is
starting to phase this "feature" out. In my mind it is obnoxious to assume
that you want to automatically inject the default route into RIP (or any IGP
for that matter), so I hope that Cisco is indeed removing it.
Thank you,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
Message
available for free at work, online, etc.
My $0.02,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
""Dave Shine"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have any input on the CCIE bootcamps for
> the lab. Is this worth the money? I dont want to
available for free at work, online, etc.
My $0.02,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
""Dave Shine"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have any input on the CCIE bootcamps for
> the lab. Is this worth the money? I dont want to
a few days ago. Has
anybody got this to work, and if so, with what version of IOS? By the way,
"ip default-network" works just fine.
Thank you,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44863&t=44863
--
Tell him to use SMTP for AD replication, and disable the fixup feature for
SMTP
on the PIX.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Donlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX and MS Active Directory [7:44797]
Brian
I've just fo
There are a few things wrong with that description.
First, switches and/or bridges are layer two devices and wouldn't be
aware of different IP subnets in the first place. A switch or bridge
will forward a frame out all ports except the originating port if it has
not yet learned the correct port
ry
to upload 9.0. If anybody has any additional info on the limitations of the
older 1900s, please post because I can't find anything more on CCO.
Sincerely,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
""Justin M. Clark"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..
finally
found a null modem cable with the same pinout that is specified in the 1900
documentation for release 5.x:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/28201900/1928v5x/icg5x/c
sspec.htm
When I use the correct(!) null modem it cable it works fine.
Sincerely,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
.
John
>>> "rtiwari" 5/21/02 12:57:01 PM >>>
Could somebody will please describe me the difference in
between bridge and switch.
Thanks
Ravi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44651&t=44649
-
ebooks. As
far as the Security written, dunno. I heard reading all of the RFCs is
pretty entertaining...
My $0.02,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
""Brian Zeitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have most of the Cisco security books now. MC
is always
worthy of consideration.
Regards,
John
p.s. It just occurred to me that I really don't even know if nrf is
male or female! Email aliases such as nrf and noglikirf are pretty
gender neutral. :-) So, nrf, feel free to replace all references to
he/him/his with the appropriate
I've been seeing a few emails trickling in
now that Paul has reset a few things so I'm
hoping things are back to normal. I hope
so, I'm starting to go through withdrawal
symptoms. :-)
Regards,
John
p.s. Yes, this is really just a test email
but we're not supposed to send test e
rious situation.
Okay, time to get some more coffee. I'm rambling. Perhaps I should
attempt to argue that IGRP is a path vector protocol. Or perhaps ponder
over tunneling token ring over encrypted HSRP tunnels.
Regards,
John
Message Posted at:
http://ww
>>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" 5/14/02 11:46:39 AM >>>
>> No modern routing protocol uses composite metrics, in the sense
that
>> a numerical value is computed from several factors. I don't know
if
>> you'd consider route preference (e.g., OSPF intraarea over
interarea
>> over external) to be com
r regardless of
whether it's set at the default or not. If you tweak this parameter you
will alter the OSPF cost.
HTH,
John
>>> "Kevin Cullimore" 5/14/02 1:14:24 AM >>>
An opportunity for misunderstanding that underlies this thread involves
the
following:
DEFAUL
g for.
To determine if Proxy ARP is enabled on Router B, use 'show ip int e1'.
Somewhere in that output should be your answer.
John
>>> "Henrique Duarte" 5/13/02 3:50:37 PM >>>
John,
thanks for the feedback.
So PC2 doesn't have a default gateway conf
I believe a 2500 series can act as a router for dot1q trunking. While 10mb
isnt recommended because of overhead, it should work in a lab environment to
gain experience with trunking.
- Original Message -
From: "Marco Gaona"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 8:48 PM
Subject: RE: 2900 seri
Now, if you're bridging then PC1 and PC2 should be on the same subnet
and neither would require a default gateway to speak to the other.
HTH,
John
>>> "Henrique Duarte" 5/13/02 2:50:43 PM >>>
OK Networking gurus. I hope you can help me with this easy one:
e the bandwidth parameter you would change both the OSPF
and EIGRP metrics.
HTH,
John
>>> "W. Alan Robertson" 5/13/02 2:04:57 PM
>>>
Revise and extend:
There is no direct correlation between the values of the interface
"bandwidth" and the "ospf cost" comm
lation between
>"bandwidth" and "cost."
There isn't? How does OSPF determine the cost of a link?
Regards,
John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44093&t=44055
--
FAQ, list ar
You will need to either purchase it from an authorized
Cisco Reseller or download it from Ciscos site if you
have a logon.
--- mail wrote:
> Thanks for the input
> how can i get this IOS
> thanks
> akin
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Golovich"
> To
For NAT on version 11.3 it must be an ip plus IOS.
I believe NAT was built into IP only around the 12.1
release
--- mail wrote:
> hi
> i trying to configure nat on a 1605 router and any
> time i try to enter the
> comand ip nat pool it does not recognise the command
> i am running IOS Version 1
801 - 900 of 3480 matches
Mail list logo
