Well, we have two right answers (you can do it with a wildcard mask of
0.0.0.254) and two wrong answers (it's not possible). I'll break the tie
and say you can do it ;-)
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071
Er, yes you can. Two people have already replied on how. Use a WILDCARD
mask of 0.0.0.254. Simple, easy, effective. I'd hate to have to type in
128 permit statements. Probably end up writing a Perl one-liner, but the
easier way is to use the proper WILDCARD mask.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys
his email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Reimer, Fred
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
hi reimer,
Thanks for ur reply, and
SAP, SAP, what the heck is SAP? At first I thought it was SIP, but that
doesn't sound right. Maybe it's referring to the COMPANY SAP? If so, what
specific application are you talking about?
I must say SAP's website is a nightmare. Looks like all marketing speak to
me. Bunch of mumbo jumbo and
uld immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:45 PM
To: Reimer, Fred
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ciscoview-urgent [7:75227]
hi reimer,
Thanks for ur reply but not getting wh
VitalNet from Lucent Technologies can use Cisco SAA, so in a way it's
distributed polling. Any (recent) IOS device would become a
sensor/collector.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
If you happen to be running PIM Sparse-Dense mode with auto-RP and
"duplicate" loopback IP addresses then you need a special patch for
CiscoWorks in order for it to properly discover the 6509's... This probably
effects anything that has "duplicate" loopback IP addresses.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Ecli
Scenario III is probably the most recommended. It is incorrect to say that
the VPN Concentrator does not have filtering capabilities. It generally
only allows traffic in its public interface necessary for VPN connections,
so it is not any more inherently insecure as a PIX. It does not have all o
Well, I'm not a CCIE, but I don't think you need to be a CCIE to answer this
question. The subnet mask has nothing to do with the amount of load on the
network. A side effect of having a small network mask is that there are
potentially more hosts on the network, which could mean that there is mor
Heh, I installed quite a few of those Cisco router blades in Synoptics hubs!
I also liked their SPARC network management modules, but I don't think that
had anything to do with Cisco.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell:
immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
At 11:34 AM -0400 9/10/03, Reimer, Fred wrote:
>Ye
Oh, it's just getting fun. It's not like we are flaming anyone. We are
just expressing our opinions! ;-)
I'd agree with you. No BGP for NA's. And as far as who I'd want touching
my Internet facing router, it would depend on what type of business it was.
If it was a small business, where all th
I've always liked hex myself. A hex mask of FF.FF.F8.00 can be written as
F800 and still mean the same thing. You obviously can't do that with
255.255.128.0 (255.255.128.0 != 2,552,551,280). While binary works the same
way as hex in this manner, it is much to long for my tastes. Plus, hex i
That is correct. Or at least it can only support one VLAN in common with
the Cisco gear. It can have all the VLANs it wants as long as it does not
have dual links to the Cisco gear, creating a loop which will not be blocked
with Spanning Tree, because it doesn't support PVST+.
BTW - what are "Hw
Yes, but the CCIE labs are supposed to be for ISP level engineers, who
almost certainly won't be using default routes most of the time. It should
be assumed that by the time you get to the CCIE level you have much
experience in default routing.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashfo
6:37 PM
To: 'Reimer, Fred'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
Oh, and while I'm on the subject - why EIGRP? This is a proprietary
Cisco Protocol. OK, I believe that Juniper may have implemented it, but
to the best of my knowledge no one
gt;
> Dom Stocqueler
> SysDom Technologies
> Visit our website - www.sysdom.org
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 September 2003 23:37
> To: 'Reimer, Fred'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Please
ccess-list extended vpn_tunnel
permit ip 172.16.254.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 120 permit ip 172.16.254.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
!
route-map static_servers_bypass_NAT permit 10
match ip address 120
set ip next-hop 1.1.1.2
!
Phoenix_Colo#
Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
age-
From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Reimer, Fred'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
And one last point, No LAN is an island, why two IG(P) protocols and no
EG(P) pro
x27;m incorrect here) you just have to
watch out for address over lap neer your subnetwork boundries.
I think I got it.
Man I love this news group!
Steve
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
>>No offense, but this is CCNA material.
>
>
> Do they still
No offense, but this is CCNA material. If you are going for your CCNP, then
you should already have your CCNA and know the answer. But anyway...
If you need a network with 400 hosts, the smallest subnet would have a /23
mask. So take the first part of your given network and assign it to that:
r rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: "Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits
x27;m incorrect here) you just have to
watch out for address over lap neer your subnetwork boundries.
I think I got it.
Man I love this news group!
Steve
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
>>No offense, but this is CCNA material.
>
>
> Do they still
, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
Rei
-
From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
No offense, but this is CCNA material. If you are going for your CCNP, then
you should already have your CCNA and know
No offense, but this is CCNA material. If you are going for your CCNP, then
you should already have your CCNA and know the answer. But anyway...
If you need a network with 400 hosts, the smallest subnet would have a /23
mask. So take the first part of your given network and assign it to that:
If you're not getting more than a few MB of transfer speed out of a 100Mb
link, then it is undoubtedly a autonegotiation / speed issue.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This
You do need NAT traversal if you "only" change the IP addresses.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be le
I just received confirmation that my NetworkSim project has been approved by
SourceForge. It will take me a while to get the proper licensing materials
embedded in the source files, but look for it to become active in the next
few days. I'll need to look into what I need to do to get the files
up
Theoretically, you don't even need a switch in the middle. If these are
ISP-connected routers, and the firewall is doing the NAT, then the three
routers must be doing BGP to the ISPs by definition. They would each have
full routing tables. On the "inside" (external to PIX) segment, the three
rou
Why would you want to?
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privileged. It is intended only for
8 max, not 4.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named
We've installed tons of 6509's with EtherChannel ports spanned between
modules.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information
I'm confused. Assuming that the users are separated from their servers by
at least one router hop (otherwise if the servers failed, so would the
users, so what's the use of the DR?), then why can't you just assign the
same IP addresses to the servers at the DR site? If the production servers
are
How about Cisco Systems? Just use their SAA.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privileged. I
With some prodding by Doug Stevenson, and probably in the wrong direction,
I'm working on a router simulator in my spare time. It's written in Perl
using POE. So far you can add interfaces, assign addresses, enable RIP, add
networks to RIP, connect interfaces together. The RIP "process" (POE
ses
I'm sure this HAS to be somewhere on Cisco's web site, but a brief general
explanation is this: Cisco, and most other vendor's hardware now-adays, has
ASIC chips that inspect ingress traffic coming into the switch. It also has
a shared memory buffer that it stores cached route-switch information.
A dial-list can specify an extended access list, why don't you just create
one with time ranges.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprie
John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 5:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Gibberish in email [7:74740]
Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
> It is an attempt by the SPAMers to avoid SPAM software that
> takes a hash of
> the SPAM and blocks SPAM on
Wow! Given your CCIE number you must be using a REALLY old router for that
ping. Most newer models send five echo requests, not three. Either that or
some packets got lost somewhere...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Ce
No, what was your experience??? I expect from your question that you had
issues...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary informa
It is an attempt by the SPAMers to avoid SPAM software that takes a hash of
the SPAM and blocks SPAM on machines based on these hash values. There are
some anti-SPAM "solutions" out there that basically relies on the users to
mark email as SPAM. When they do, the client machines send the hash of
m your computer.
-Original Message-
From: dre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ip snooping in cisco routers [7:74708]
""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message ...
> Cisco routers don't have the ab
Cisco routers don't have the ability to capture packets. However, you can
use an ACL and the debug ip packet command to get some limited information.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
No, what was your experience??? I expect from your question that you had
issues...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary informa
I would hope so, especially if they support Spanning Tree. It would be kind
of hard to run the Spanning Tree protocol without a MAC address...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTI
is message. If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Wilmes, Rusty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02,
>From the Cisco Security Configuration Guide:
"When CHAP is enabled on an interface and a remote device attempts to
connect to it, the access server sends a CHAP packet to the remote device.
The CHAP packet requests or "challenges" the remote device to respond. The
challenge packet consists of an
What are you trying to accomplish? A configuration using specific protocols
for some lab, or are you just trying to get some connectivity up and
running? Why don't you just use backup interface? Ah, it looks like you
are doing this for a lab, and not a real-life reason. O.K., is your IPsec
conn
Think of it like this. Each switch is supposed to block redundant ports
leading to the root bridge. Say Switch1 and Switch2 are interlinked, and
also have downlink connections to the root bridge, like this:
Switch1 -- Switch2
| |
| |
Core1 -- Core2
Sa
otify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Bharani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
There is none. Other than the fact that it is the last Class A address.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
m
Hmm, that's bizarre. I'm running 4.02B and I can use SHA. Where did you
get the information that 3.6 and above don't support SHA???
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This
The problem with analogies is that they often help you understand the
correct answer to a question, but seldom help you understand the "why"
behind the answer. The analogies I like to use most often are the models of
the protocols themselves. Think of each protocol as a state machine, or
rather s
You wrote:
" A few years ago we were all (well some of us) scared about the
scalability of OSPF - how much memory, processing power and how many
AS's could it scale to. This is why IS-IS was looked at by tier 1 and 2
carriers. In those days, a 7206 with a 150MHz proc was common place, and
we were
Windows automatically adds a dynamic route once the PPTP connection is
established, or at least it should. Basically, it sets the metric to 2 for
your "old" default router, and adds in a new default route with a metric of
1 once the tunnel is established. If you are not getting the tunnel
establi
Are you using unnumbered on your serial interface? Try using an assigned IP
address and see if that makes a difference.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains
The subject should be renamed Amazing Answers...
Whether a port is blocking or not, or even if Spanning Tree is running on
the device, has absolutely no bearing on whether the port is physically up
or down.
The rest of the info is acceptable, but to throw that little nugget of
"information" in th
The new exams will include features that are available in the 12.2 version
of code
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary infor
But you always have to consider caveat lector
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privilege
CHAP authentication does not use a TCP/UDP port. CHAP is handled in the PPP
protocol between the client and the router. The router may use some other
type of authentication (RADIUS, TACACS+, etc) to authenticate the user to
some outside security server, but the CHAP communications is carried over
CHAP authentication does not use a TCP/UDP port. CHAP is handled in the PPP
protocol between the client and the router. The router may use some other
type of authentication (RADIUS, TACACS+, etc) to authenticate the user to
some outside security server, but the CHAP communications is carried over
Please pass this on to Annlee.
I've already sent another message with an excerpt (fair use!) from the new
Cisco training materials that refutes this.
The "threats" are:
Structured
Unstructured
Internal
External
The "attacks" are:
Reconnaissance
Access
Denial of Service
I don't know what "data
We tend not to answer specific short questions like those that appear they
may come from an actual test, especially when presented in a list like that.
There is a confidentiality agreement you should have read when you took the
test... The purpose of the exams is to test your understanding of the
Indubitably - Checked on www.m-w.com :-)
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privileged. It is i
It depends on Company B's firewall, and how it is setup to allow IPsec
traffic (or not). Theoretically, there is no difference between connecting
to Company A via an ISP connection and connecting to Company A through
Company B, except that Company B's firewall may not allow or be capable of
allowi
74304]
At 7:10 PM + 8/25/03, Reimer, Fred wrote:
>A structured threat is a threat from someone who has experience and
>knowledge as far as breaking into networks. An unstructured threat is a
>threat by a script kiddie. I guess they use structured because a
>knowledgeable black
That would kind of be like finding out the DLCI numbers for a Frame Relay
network without the telco telling you what they are Wouldn't it?
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE
email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SAFE and the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch [7:74304]
Reimer, Fred wrote
MCNS is old material. The new material is SECUR. The new material, all
five courses, say it's unstructured, structured, internal, and external...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NO
Difference between Cisco and Nortel - main diff is cli and menu driven? Not
necessarily. If you are talking about the old Wellfleet/Bay Nortel routers,
then they certainly have a CLI. You just need to know the MIB very well,
and you should be able to configure it with the CLI. I know it used to
Structured
Unstructured
Internal
External
It's covered in every training course I've taken so far on my way to CCSP.
CSVPN covers it, SECUR covers it, CSI covers it, I believe CSPFA covers it,
and CSIDS probably covers it.
Joshua covered the four remote-access types nicely...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
It depends on the configuration of the hub. If the hub supports both 3DES
and DES, then the client will be able to connect. What, exactly are you
asking???
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-2
No you don't (have a couple of VLANs, some with ISL and others with 802.1q).
The trunking protocol is not an attribute of a VLAN, it is an attribute of a
physical (trunking) port. You have some VLANs, put them on whatever trunk
port you desire.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashfo
No you don't (have a couple of VLANs, some with ISL and others with 802.1q).
The trunking protocol is not an attribute of a VLAN, it is an attribute of a
physical (trunking) port. You have some VLANs, put them on whatever trunk
port you desire.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashfo
I think you want the next hop in your route-maps to be 192.168.10.2 and
192.168.20.2 respectively. Send it through the GRE tunnel.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email
The default route on your TFTP server is not set properly.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally
Cisco PIX and IOS software (with the FW/IDS feature set) includes some
virus/attack blocking capabilities. It is more limited than their
stand-alone IDS products. For more detail, I think it would be helpful to
know exactly what your friend said. What were they trying to suggest?
Fred Reimer -
I don't know about the DMVPN, or what it even is, but for a "standard" IPsec
VPN the ports would be UDP 500, and PROTOCOLS 50 and 51. Now, that is
assuming that there is no NAT going on, and you are using tunnel mode, so
that you don't see the GRE tunnel in the first header. If there is NAT,
then
There are know bugs in the IOS/CatOS hybrid code where the cef adjacencies
are not updated correctly. Basically, the MSFC thinks it programmed the SUP
caches correctly, when it did not. If you are on an old version of code, I
would suggest upgrading to a later version. I don't have the bug ID
ha
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 11:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT Microsoft worm [7:74045]
""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For reasons of confidentiality I won't and can't name any names, but I am
&
It is VERY important to know what interfaces is used for the OSPF router ID,
and to make sure that interface is a loopback interface. If you let it
choose a normal interface, and that interface goes down, your OSPF process
will essentially bounce because it will select another interface IP as the
Hmm, PSPF definitely sounds interesting, but I'd recommend requiring the
integrated Cisco firewall in the VPN client, and not allowing split
tunneling.
Also, there is apparently a working group working on VPN multicast...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlant
For reasons of confidentiality I won't and can't name any names, but I am
aware of several hospitals that were affected pretty seriously. Everyone
here knows that Cisco Call Manager runs on Windows, so imagine what happens
to your entire phone infrastructure if you are running VoIP. Network grind
Well, I thought for sure I was going to fail, but I passed the CSI test with
a score of 902. Needed 825 out of 1000...
After giving it some thought, I think it's probably better if I don't
comment on the wireless questions at this point. I had typed up quite a bit
of observations that I just del
No, that would not make sense.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privileged. It is intended o
Being in healthcare, I have some strong views on this topic. Unfortunately,
I'm cramming for the CSI test I have tomorrow, and I still have two chapters
to go through on the KnowledgeNet course. So, you will just have to wait...
LOL Expect some comments on EAP-TLS, WPA, and assorted technologie
A "window" is not a thing that gets sent in a TCP session. You don't send
"windows." A window is the size of the TCP receive buffer. A receiver can
send an ACK before its receive buffer is full. Perhaps you are thinking of
a "segment" in Cisco's terminology, or a chunk of data from one TCP
appl
It's very simple. A loopback interface provides a connection point on a
router that is not tied to a physical interface. It is very useful in many
situations, for basically the same reason. Take OSPF for example. Without
a loopback it will use the address of one of its physical interfaces for t
ctly across both the 802.1q
and ISL
trunks as follows:
3524 PCa in Vlan 3
|
| 802.1q trunk
|
3508
|
| ISL trunk
|
3524 PCb in Vlan 3
Can PCa reach PCb ???
"Reimer, Fred" wrote:
> You can mix and match on different ports in the same switch. But
obviousl
Why don't you consider the VPN Concentrator 3002 Hardware Client. It offers
LAN-to-LAN VPN capabilities, can be remotely upgraded automatically, etc.
You can even get one with an 8-port 10/100 switch for the small locations.
The CVPN3002-8E-BUN-K9 lists for $1,195. It cost more than a 831, at $64
I haven't read the rest of the replies to this yet, but I think there is
some confusion (probably on my part reading the post I replied to). The
post I replied to talked about "putting into the [OSPF] routing table." If
there is a static and a BGP route, the router should put both into the
active
O.K., no problem, everyone makes mistakes, and that was a pretty easy one to
make.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary informati
O.K., no problem, everyone makes mistakes, and that was a pretty easy one to
make.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary informati
I'd consider the 3005 at the remote sites. It has the capability to do a
LAN-to-LAN NAT, where if you had customer A and customer B that both used
10.1.x you could map them to 45.1 and 45.2 respectively, or any other
equal-mask network.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Cente
That's a zero subnet, there are no 1 bits in the subnet. Subnet bits are
0.255.255.0, and they are all zero's...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confid
" FWIW, I just ran into the following: when you take the SECUR
642-501, CSPFA 642-521, or CSVPN 642-511 exams and you are a
CCNA or CCDA recert candidate, if you pass the exam your NA or DA
is recertified. I haven't got the time to chase other exams, but
somebody else might."
What exactly do
sional-level exams, does your Associate-level cert get updated, even
> if it hasn't expired? Or does it update iff it has already expired?
>
> Annlee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1
They told us in the Networkers Power Session that the only thing you needed
to know about ATM was how to configure a router as a client connection. Be
able to setup a PVC, SVC (Using ILMI), and Classical IP-over-ATM (yuck),
including setting up a router as an ARP Server. They specifically ruled o
The 3000's support fail-over just fine, and the new version even supports
"multi-entry point" VPNs (like Check Point has for years). Basically
meaning that at your main site you can have two 3030's with connections to
different ISP's and totally different external addresses.
See:
"Backup LAN-to-
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
