get in the way (or a know-it-all in-house admin).
As for the max switch hop, STP may be 7, but that's too much. You should
try to stick to the basic model Cisco has been pushing for years - 3.
Access, Distro, Core, which you seem to recognize. If they balk at your
suggestions, you can show the
You have a cool set up there. I wish I designed it. : )
I can't think of anything that has a 60s activity timer except for BGP, but
unless you had a bizillion neighbors and they all hello'd at same time,
that's not your problem. Honestly, I'd get a sniffer in there to see
therefore they do
not
> advertise "periodically", which implied predictable regularity
>
>
> ""John Green"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > C and D (info about links and routes) is always true
> > for
; Or, include both the written and lab exam, e.g. John
> > > Neiberger, CCIE
> > > Written, CCIE R&S #12005.
> > >
> > > Nah, because only one of those is a cert. I give
> > > up, what's the trick?
> > >
> > &g
its between the
buildings.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Chuck"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> this is not one of those "I have a customer" questions, although "I have a
> customer" is the starting point.
Need more info to answer question.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""travis marlow"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I need to tap into the collective brain power of this list. We have 4
7206
> VXR's that are all plugged into
Reading your output further, the router told you that the masks didn't
match:
> > OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 10.103.56.1
> > Dead R 40 C 40, Hello R 10 C 10 Mask R 255.255.248.0 C 255.255.240.0
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Steven A. Ridder"&quo
urs.
> When i ping 224.0.0.5 from both the routers both of them respond and there
> is no problem at layer3, ican ping each other.
> i did a debug on R1 and get the foll
> OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 10.103.56.1
> Dead R 40 C 40, Hello R 10 C 10 Mask R 255.255.248.0
Has anyone ever attempted to set up a FAQ section on the groupstudy.com
website? I know that there are afew questions that are asked all the time
such as "What equipment do I need for my home lab?" or "what books do I need
to study for the CCIE exam?" etc,., etc.,
I'
si.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Kelly Cobean"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have an idea, why don't we just standardize on a Language that NOBODY
uses
> anymore, like maybe formal Latin. That way, you all can waste ev
]...
> How about this: the more tests people have to take, the more money Cisco
> makes.
>
> >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 03/14/02 11:13AM >>>
> a big passage below...i hope some of it makes sense to you
>
> ccnp exams are easy. they should be made more
TO me a csu is a csu. I personally don't have any preference, but I do
prefer being able to configure channels on the front screen as opposed to
having proprietary cables and wacky key combinations to access menus. I
once had to drive 2.5 hours one way in a snow storm to Cape Cod (no I w
D]...
> Atlantis Partners is just a bad company all around, from what I can
> tell. Here in Denver they post fake job openings just to get people to
> send in resumes to fill their databases. I couldn't believe it when I
> discovered that they did this. Why would anyone use a c
I did't read all the questions. It depends on the switch, but it probably
is FIFO, but switches may be able to do PQ, WFQ, etc. Usually it's fifo.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTE
It get q'd
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""John Green"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> a node connects to a switch and switch in turn
> connects to all other nodes. hence in effect when a
> node transmits it is the only one
Keep in mind that 7 is the max number of hops if using STP. STP dosen't
treat the cluster as one hop.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Kelly Cobean"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The max number of Cat3548's in a Cluster is
Cisco claims that the CCIE lab has recently been updated to include more
relevant and real world topic than ever before. Also, I am saying all this
as a 3rd party as I have never experienced the lab.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Chuck"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&qu
Use command "redistribute static (metric)" under the ospf process. It will
be an E2 metric unless you add the metric-type1 to the command as well.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""NetEng"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If I
on this
>
> It would be impossible for Cisco to test for everything out there - old
and
> new. The question becomes this: is any certification forward looking or
> backwards looking? Face it, the whole reason for certification is for
> companies to go to the marketplace and show potential
It's "funny" because they want a JR NETWORK ENGINEER! (with ccie). In
theory, a CCIE isn't a jr level.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Jason"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Not sure what's so funny about it
Kris,
I didn't buy a lab until I started studying for the CCIE lab. I passed the
CCNA, CCNP, CCDA, CCDP, and CCIE written without a home lab (though I did
get good experience at work). I really feel that all of these tests are more
"knowledge" tests rather than "practic
s changed effective 3-12-02 [7:37960]
>
>
> The CCNA exam 640-507 has been replaced by 640-607 and now includes
> software simulation questions requiring you to configure a network.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/whats_
Good. Keeps the CCNA honest.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Andy Barkl"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The CCNA exam 640-507 has been replaced by 640-607 and now includes
> software simulation questions requiring yo
ed?
>
> I have tried both but my dynamic nat does not work. I have RTA connected
to
> RTB via Ethernet on a 10.10.1.0/24 netw. RTB is connected to RTD via
> serial/FR on 172.16.6.0/24 netw. I have the pool defined and also an
> access-list and also ip nat inside and outside on e0
Yes, they can both be in area 0. PID is a Cisco specific function that
allows for more than 1 OSPF process run on a router at once. It has local
signifigance only.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Justin M. Clark"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROT
Create a static route on B which points all 172.16.200.0 traffic to A and
eliminate the summary route on A.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""HUNG NGUYEN"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Wonder if anyone has ever tried this senario:
>
Gurus,
an apology in advance for the basic question, but scouring the archives
didn't help as I couldn't seem to narrow down my search enough... here is my
problem ~ I have 3 routers that habitually boot to the rommon mode, not when
doing a reload (they boot fine then), but only wh
Rich, I don't think you're a CCNP any more. I think the CCIE supercedes
that. Am I correct?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Richard Newman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Great job.
>
> Richard Newman, CCIE#88
Config a router to be a frame switch. Make the hub router's connection to
the frame switch 1554k. Make a spoke router's connection to be 64K. Then
blast traffic to him. I believe you will flood the frame switches egress
port of the 64K's side. Then apply traffic shaping
they're also "thinking" of letting third parties proctor the lab, so people
can get there easier. The only problem is not losing control of the LAB and
keeping standards high. Also more real wold scenarios, updated technologies
will be in the lab.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
&qu
He never gave a date and he's gone now. He said real soon though and I
beleive it only covers the lab. Cisco still expects a CCIE to be able to
support token-ring, but not implement it. Same as all the other legacy
technologies.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Kaminski, Shaw
I maen 1:5 ratio
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In a few months you won't have to. they are removing token ring from lab
> exam as they already did with x.25, appletalk,
In a few months you won't have to. they are removing token ring from lab
exam as they already did with x.25, appletalk, LAT, etc.. I heard it
directly from William Parkhurst, the program manager for the CCIE program.
He also said that there will be some new certifications within the
I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be removing
Token-ring soon!
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Scott H."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Not that bad. A bunch of dates open in March and April in San J
What's the problem?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""David j"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I know that this is a Cisco forum, but anybody has been working with
Nortel
> BPS2000 and BayStack 450?
> We have bought some BP
Sounds broken. Send it back and ask for a 1751, as the 1750 is EOL'd
anyways. In the meantime, plug into a console and check for diagnostic
messages to see what it's saying.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Ismail Al-Shelh"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
You can go cheap and get a 1751. Takes the same card and can allow up to 4
voice calls at once.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Tim Medley"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> It depends on what you are trying to accomplish.
>
> 2600's and 3600's
is scroll lock on?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Craig Columbus"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Has anyone run into an issue where a 2500 series router won't respond to
> console input?
> Here's the deal:
> The PC is running 9600-8-N-1
Our campus network at Staples HQ had a ATM based backbone that had SVC's.
Have no idea why, and there were always problems with the SVC's never being
torn down properly, but they were used.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
upgrade IOS.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Ranma"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Hi,
>
> anyone has the following problem ?
>
> I have an Cisco 1750 - 4V chassis and 2 voice E&M Card
>
> Now after follow Cisco Recomendation and using IOS 12.1(5)T
> the machine cannot recognize the Vo
ke
> this work - and I'd wager that they aren't really devoting a lot of
> development time to RIP anymore!
> Incidentally, I created a supernet on a loopback with a /22 and then tried
> putting all 4 class Cs into RIP as networks to see if that would magically
> fix it - it d
I had a hard time believing that there would be a router that didn't support
multicast until I looked up some old UseNet articles:
From: Nick Filimonov
Subject: Non-multicast point-to-point and OSPF
Date: 1997/04/06
Message-ID: #1/1
Organization: IREX/Moscow
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.
twork that do not support multicast addressing.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> I've been reading the CCO configuration guides and I now have a
> question. What is the difference between the following:
>
I believe Rc would know the network to be equal cost between the two
routers.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Ouellette, Tim"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> I have a question regarding # 2.
>
> let's say both routera and router b are connected and a
I'm pretty good with QOS. If you connect your special switch to a router
and you mark your packets with IP Prec or DiffServ (which one is it?) your
packet will remain marked until they reach the destination. The only time
you would lose these markings is if a router is programmed to stri
ou have:
RA--RB (s0)--(s0) RC (e0)___|
If router C considers it's S0 link to be a cost of 2 and Router B
considers the same link to be 1000, then RA will receive link to be based on
RB's calculation. But router A will receive Router C's e0 link as based on
the cost
Do you want to limit traffic incomming or outgoing? Based on any type opf
traffic, or all?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Mohannad Khuffash"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Hello,
> Is there any spesific command i can use to limit the bandwidth available
at
> the ethernet interfaces ?
I tried it a few months ago. I guess I'll go and take the new one.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Andy Barkl"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> I took it last week and it's entirely new. The new objectives are listed
> on the web site, SNA and AT
Get your CCNP, then pass the CallManager 3.1, Cvoice and QoS test and voila,
your a CITSS.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""ko haag"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Really? What do you need to do? I was suggested to boycot the CID
test.:-)
> Ko
>
> "
As you know with MP3, you won't really make much money because it's so
easily copy-able. You'd be on Napster, Morpheus, WinMX in no time. If you
don't mind the piracy, I think it would be a great idea!
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Audy Bautista"" wrote
Cisco IP Telephony Support Specialist. It's real easy to get.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Brian Zeitz"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> What is Cisco AVVID? I read some stuff about it on Cisco's site. Are
> there any test that correlate with this?
Message Posted at:
http://www.g
On the Cat 6k you can do IP Prec or DiffServ. Otherwise you have to map
802.1p to Prec or DiffServ. By summer a lot more models will be able to do
this such as the 2900 and 4900, 4000, etc. Nortel already does this on
their Business Policy Manager switch and it's pretty reasonably pric
what are the forbidden words? Why are they there?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
""Chuck"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> On occasion I am unable to check the moderator's queue on a timely or
> regular basis. this has meant that some messages, flagged due
BOYCOT THE CID!
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""dk"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry if this question has been asked before but a brief look in the
archives
> yielded no results.
>
> I'm studying for the CCDP and have only
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > ashish
> > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: detect routers and switches [7:36873]
> >
> >
> > well, that's not my problem.
> > I have to find a general way
Look up MQC on Cisco.com. It is possible and by default if the router has
WFQ on, it already "reacts" to different ToS (IP Prec) values.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""TP"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Dear group,
> i have the following situatio
Check the SNMP variables. Otherwise just call a person on site.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""ashish"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> well, that's not my problem.
> I have to find a general way to find whether a remote IP box is a router
or
> a s
Thanks. I knew I was right, I just have an ignorant sales engineer that I
need to convince. He's the type that dosen't believe anything unless he
sees it.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Kelly Cobean"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Yep, you are c
So if line is up and protocol is down, then if I remember correctly the
router will think the link is useless, right? Then it will choose a
different router (such as a floating static route) or ISDN if that's where
the routing table points it, right?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
""
I'm almost 100% sure in my head, but I need to make sure of this. I don't
have any CSU's to test this on.
If I have a router that connects to an external CSU/DSU and the far side of
the CSU goes down (the side that connect to a smartjack or even further
upstream), the router wil
Those debugs are a good start to see if you are finishing your connection to
the isdn switch. The debugs aren't that large.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
""neil K."" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Hi All,
>
> I want Troubleshoot a ISDN connection to
You are correct. It's usually the port. For example, An Arrowpoint can do
this.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
""John Green"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> I am reading a document and cannot fully comprehend
> what it means. can someone explain, atleast
ction is understood fine. but what does
> the prefix multilayer denote or mean ?
>
> state refers to the state of a session information
> that is temporarily kept in a state table for open
> connections and is wiped or erased when the sessio
That C/S cert seems to be the way to go! That's what I'd go for, but since
only one person has ever passed it, I think it may be safe to say that I'd
never get a CCIE number that way. I may go for that cert once I get my R/S
CCIE done. What makes that test so hard? And h
Or possibly the C/S CCIE, but the fact that that exam has
> only been successful passed by one person (the proctor in Halifax),
perhaps
> it's not such a good idea.
>
> ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> > I saw a n
Use WunRAR to poen the .rar file. it's like winzip.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
"""[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Contractor (NSANAP N63)"""
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> a .rar file is a rawrite file if I remember correctly. this is a file you
&g
Ok. makes more sense.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> No. A port that is blocked does not send BPDUs. It does receive them. I
> just checked IEEE 802.1D.
>
> In order to
Australia uses "european-format" time as well?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> However if you do this I suggest you use a less ambiguous date format - my
> first reaction is "oh, so you did the lab
yes it has to in order to participate.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Pierre-Alex Guanel"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> So a blocked port can receive AND send BPDUs Correct?
>
> Pierre-Alex
>
> -Original Mes
I saw a network recently with DECNet, but you've got to admit, they're few
and far between. I've done a 100:1 ratio of wireless networks, vpn,
firewalls, etc,. as compared to a DECnet or Banyan Vines network (in fact,
I've never seen a banyan vines network except in my old co
You can have a better numbering/identificaton process if you use loopback
numbers, rather than some arbitraty IP.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""cclark"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In determining DR and BDR, OSPF will use the prio
my social to my bank and other
> parties I have a financial arrangement with, thats it. There must be a
> better way using keys, a challenge response or something like that.
>
> Bri
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Chuck wrote:
>
> > don't even get me started on this. I work for an
For routing and switching - none. Is it me or is the R&S track getting
outdated? It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not as
current.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Persio Pucci"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> How much of MPLS (if some at all
is
> connected to S1 on Router 2. The problem is that the S1 to S1 link comes
up
> and stays up. The S0 to S0 link comes up but goes down in a few seconds.
It
> keeps going up and down in this way repeatedly. Could someone please shed
> some light?
>
> The routers are connected usin
It's the average frequency of human voice. if you look at a conversation on
a osciliscope, it averages out to 4k, so you double that and get the 8k
sample rate.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROT
I honestly only know of routers supporting CAR, no switches.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""wei deng"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> rt
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36584&t=36466
--
I agree lose the CCIE written as a cert.
I'm almost in the same situation as you, but I decided to get my CCIE first
then go back and get the MBA. But, the two "certification" lead down two
entirely different paths - One is a highly technical field while the other
focuses
between any two routing protocols over any topology.
>
> 2) route filtering - there is more than one way
>
> 3) there is a topic that may be NDA if I say anything specific, but for
> which there is a specific CCNP test, and which if you read this and/or the
> CCIE list you see all kinds
I'm more than a CCNA. I was saying that back when I was a CCNA, I wouldn't
have settled for less than 50K. But you did bring up the good point that in
this economy a CCNA wouldn't get a job at 50K. I guess that it could be
true.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""nrf&q
No, just wishful thinking.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""ko haag"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Any News on when Cisco may fix it? I was planning on take the CID test on
> Wednesday.
> Is there another test I could take
With all these conflicting answers, it just proves my point that the CID is
a crummy, poorly worded test. Don't give Cisco the $125 until the fix it!
""Russ Kreigh"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think A would be rig
Can't you block it with your e-mail clinet?
""Gaz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> Is anybody else receiving multiple virus's daily from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm struggling to get verizon to stop them at the moment (or temporarily
> disable his accoun
t3 microwave stuff might be in order. You need Line of Sight though.
""Sites, Bob"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Has anyone setup or can you point me to a wireless solution for an entire
> metro area? I have a hospital that
Hey man
I am thinking of taking a pure Arabica extra-rich coffee pack with me to the
exam center . That is the only reason I find it possible to pass this exam .
Otherwise my brain is going to be as effective as a potato .
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3
NAT?
>
>
> I have 2 locations, CA and NJ.
> CA has a connection to the internet, NJ does not. CA and NJ are connected
> via a point-to-point link via their serial insterfaces. With the help of
> NATting NJ now is able to access the internet via the router in CA.
>
> My proble
#x27;t already, you're behind the times by about three years! :-)
>
> John
>
> >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 2/22/02 11:43:33 AM
> >>>
> I believe you need something like
>
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www
>
> you have someth
L PROTECTED]...
> To Group:
>
> I am working with a client who is having problems with Video Conference
> using Polycom Equipment. The problem is jitter and audio drops.
>
> The solution that has been suggested to us by Cisco Low Latency Queueing
> (LLQ)
> over Frame Relay.
s:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Why is this simple task beating me?
>
> I have a router with 2eth. that separates my lab from the corporate
network.
> I would like web/ftp/telnet access from the lab to the world and back. I
> created an access list and applied it to my lab's ethernet
conversation anyone
> make is been recorded in a condensed form some where in the US.
> Conversations like telephone calls, Fax, emails, etc is been recorded and
> 'diagnosed' for some specific information, and could be reproduced and
> expanded where necessary.
>
> Wit
Hi all .
I am gonna take the foundation exam around March 20th .
I have gone through the Ciscopress books and some pracise
exams(transcenders) . I have got Hand-on experience in remote access and
switching .
I would like to know whether there is anyone out there having taken FRS who
can give me so
The router would have to have a web server with ssl built in, and I don't
believe Cisco's do.
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
> Is it possible to use https:// to access a router? I have just
It's a rumor.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I only agree partially. On the other hand, US government put censorship on
> the whole Internet, if anyone could remember what happened during US
bombing
> of the Serbs. The news said that a viru
I can get through it by just setting the ack bit in the IP packet on.
That's all it check for. Not very secure.
""Justin M. Clark"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> can someone explain to me exactly what this line means:
>
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any estab
In MA we have a high cost of living, so maybe that explains it.
""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I would have to assume that your ccna candidates
> are paid well then..Most places in the midwest
> pay cc
Well in the good old days of the economy, I made more than that even before
becoming a CCNA. I would never settle for 50k, even in this econ.,
especially as a CCIE. Plus, a CCIE IMO should already have exp., and lots
of it. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of becoming a CCIE - cisco
certified
A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company to
work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for your
training.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Sean Knox"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
thanks!
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""s vermill"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Actually there are hop count limits that need to be adhered to when you
> implement EIGRP for Appletalk and IPX. You can search on CCO and read al
ous system that the router resides in for EGP,
use the autonomous-system global configuration command."
To me it looks as if this is a throwback to the EGP days (pre-BGP). Rather
than do a search for EGP on CCO and get 1100 results that are referring to
anything but the old protocol, I have
Anyone know why there is a hop-count in EIGRP? It has a 1 byte value, but
it doesn't limit the number of hops and it looks like routers don't use it
in their calculations. Why is it there?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i
27;ve been sniffing
and debugging all morning and I can't find a metric in a packet, just raw
data.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The delay part of the EIGRP composite metric is not m
501 - 600 of 1310 matches
Mail list logo
