To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Router 827 ADSL + PIX 506 configuration [7:71059]
Okey Dokey - understood. If you're just playing around that's fine.
You may have a few options. You could use your /29 for the subnet between
router and Pix, but then you lose two of your 6 available addresses
Because I would like pratice. I would like simulate an enterprise.
Just for understand how is make in enterprise. I don't have 100 static IP,
but, anyway, I don't have 100 server.
Example, Internet--Enterprise infrastructure
or
Multi-site Enterprise--Multi-site Enterprise...
Anyway, if have
Okey Dokey - understood. If you're just playing around that's fine.
You may have a few options. You could use your /29 for the subnet between
router and Pix, but then you lose two of your 6 available addresses for the
router and the Pix. Although you can grab some of these back, for instance
by
do you have a configuration example?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71190t=71059
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
Right!
I want configure my 827 manually, not with CRWS. My connection is PPPoE with
a static IP. Also, I don't want make NAT on my router. If possible, I don't
want NAT on my PIX.
example:
DSL(static_ip)827--Ethernet(static_ip)--Outside(static_IP)506--Inside(static_ip-if
possible)--my Network
Hi there,
I assume you want to connect your ADSL router to the internet? Yes, then you
have no other option than to use NAT. You were provided with one static IP
address and this valid address is routable on the internet. Therefore you'll
need typically an extended NAT to this address for all
How company procede when the workstation have a static IP? or with the
server?
I don't think is make with a NAT and PAT ?!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71092t=71059
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
But, I have 6 static IP!!!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71091t=71059
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
a Cisco 827 ADSL with a PIX 506
I have 1 static IP + a /29 subnet
Anybody who help me?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71103t=71059
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
I need help for configure a Cisco 827 ADSL with a PIX 506
I have 1 static IP + a /29 subnet
Anybody who help me?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71059t=71059
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
Wow this is a bit wide wouldn't you say? Give some more detail and I'm sure
somebody would help you...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71075t=71059
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
He, I would like to ask if somebody tried balance the traffic over 2 adsl
(internet) in one router ( or bound them) to increase the bandwidth
using only one ISP. ?
Thanks for your help.
Amalker
Tim Champion escribis en el mensaje
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a situation whereby I want
Hello
i am having layer 1 problems in placing an 836 router for ADSL over ISDN,
the story so far ;
the LEDs of the ATM interface (Rx,Tx and CD) keep going on and
off(constantly,
yes i know, not good),
doing a #show ip int brief, obviously shows that both ATM0 and ATM0.1 are in
down state
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:44 PM
Subject: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676]
Hello
i am having layer 1 problems in placing an 836 router for ADSL over ISDN,
the story so far ;
the LEDs of the ATM interface (Rx,Tx and CD) keep going on and
off(constantly,
yes i know, not good
First of all you need Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH for adsl over
isdn support.
Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH is a short-lived, early deployment
release that will be supported in the second release of Cisco IOS Software
Release 12.3T. It supports the Cisco 831, 836, and 837 routers
First of all you need Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH for adsl over
isdn support.
Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH is a short-lived, early deployment
release that will be supported in the second release of Cisco IOS Software
Release 12.3T. It supports the Cisco 831, 836, and 837
hi i've a cisco 2621xm with a wic card adsl
i can't config the ATM
help me
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70185t=70185
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
.html
Regards
De
- Original Message -
From: hugo
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:18 PM
Subject: setup adsl 2621xm wic card [7:70185]
hi i've a cisco 2621xm with a wic card adsl
i can't config the ATM
help me
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http
between the units.
Ismail Al-Shelh
Thanks for to Troy, Skarphedinsson, Steve Wilson and all.
-Original Message-
From: Ismail Al-Shelh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:52 AM
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
I have read the MXL
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
As Skarphedinsson told me before about the G.SHDSL 828, he was completely
right.
Cisco 828 and SOHO 78 G.SHDSL routers
.
Albert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
As Skarphedinsson told me before about the G.SHDSL 828, he was completely
right
. Maybe
cisco can come out with router with multiple g.shdsl interface.
Albert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch
[7:63711
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
NON Cisco, but hey .. tutsytems have a MTU pop (Multi Tenant User),
basically its not multipoint but a chasis that can
I want to connect my branch office with my head office (1.5Km) away via ADSL
without any external service provider.
Two copper wires are laid physically from the Head Office to the Branch
office.
Is this design going to achieve my goal?
Clients PC--Ethernet--837 ADSL-pair of copper wires
I would think that you would have to use the 828 G.SHDSL Router, not an 837
ADSL, as an ADSL connection requires an DSLAM to connect to, but the G.SHDSL
is for point to point
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63712t=63711
: 25 February 2003 13:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
I want to connect my branch office with my head office (1.5Km) away via ADSL
without any external service provider.
Two copper wires are laid physically from the Head Office to the Branch
PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
I want to connect my branch office with my head office (1.5Km) away via ADSL
without any external service provider.
Two copper wires are laid physically from the Head Office to the Branch
office.
Is this design going to achieve
25, 2003 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
I want to connect my branch office with my head office (1.5Km)
away via ADSL
without any external service provider.
Two copper wires are laid physically from the Head Office to
the Branch
for MXL-2300.
Thanks for help.
Ismail Al-Shelh
-Original Message-
From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
What you want to do is possibleinfact I
-
From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
What you want to do is possibleinfact I demo'd something similar. I
used the MXL-2300 from tut systems ...
http
Hi,
Ideally, you should have the 827 using 'ip unumbered' on the ADSL (dialer)
interface, so that it uses the ethernet interface as the ip address. This
will allow the outside interface of the PIX to be in the public ip address
range that you are allocated, no need for subnetting as suggestted
I would like to thank everyone who helped out with my Pix horror picture
show.
This has aroused some possiblities where previously I couldn4t, lets say
see
the trees from the forest(or is it the other way around ;)
However this has also brought up some questions about all your suggestions.
subnet for the ADSL connection to
them (Just like a Point-to-Point T1), and they've also assigned you a
block of 8 addresses (1 used for Net boundary, 1 used for Broadcast, 1
used for the Router, 5 used for what ever you feel like), then you would
follow the suggestions for addressing that I laid out
Hello networkers,
I am trying to conjure up a working config for an ADSL link with static IPs
for a 827 series router,
these public IPs are supposed to point to, say a webserver, that sits behind
a
pix firewall
(which is directly connected to 827 router4s ethernet interface),
problem is when I
range.
HTH,
Kent
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 20:33, dlci_16 wrote:
Hello networkers,
I am trying to conjure up a working config for an ADSL link with static
IPs
for a 827 series router,
these public IPs are supposed to point to, say a webserver, that sits
behind
a
pix firewall
(which
to connect to the ISP DSLAM, i.e., Dialer Interface with
VPDN, or BVI interfaces (which is what I would expect with the scenario
you describe utilizing the ADSL interface rather than a Service Provider
DSL Modem and a PPPoE compliant Eth0 interface).
If you go with BVI interface config, then put
]--[lan/webserver]
HTH,
Brett Spunt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
dlci_16
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL and PIX puzzle [7:63458]
Hello networkers,
I am trying to conjure up a working
I've got a remote location with two ADSL lines terminating on a 2620, each
line has a separate subnet of legal IPs. Connected to the 2620 is a PIX.
I'd like to setup a VPN from this location to our central location. I'd
also like to load balance the two DSL lines (I was thinking CEF).
Question
their sites but are looking to replace this with a ADSL Solution. What
is the best ADSL Solution should I recommend for my client.Many
Thanks Simon.
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 3 months FREE*.
Message
ach line
will soon be upgraded to LES10 Circuits). The client has ISDN backup on
all their sites but are looking to replace this with a ADSL Solution.
What
is the best ADSL Solution should I recommend for my client.Many
Thanks Simon.
!) what versions or varieties of DSL is available
has a hi quality product.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Simon Watson
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 2:26 PM
Subject: ADSL QUESTION with 3600/2600 routers [7:59805]
Hi All Long time no speak hope everyone is having a blessed Christmas
I've
a Client who has a WAN
I have got three sites.
Scenario Explanation :
SIte A has a 1721 router with a ADSL connection. It has a ATM module
and a ethernet 10/100 port. Ethernet port is connected to the LAN.
SIte B and SIte c has 801 routers with a ISDN module and LAN module.
Onthe ISDN DSL is configured. VPN
We do use Verizon as well as several others. It IS possible to have ADSL
with the same up and down. SDSL isn't be definition just the same
bi-directional throughput speed. I have with Verizon as well as SWB ADSL
customers who get the same up and down speed. They are, however, still held
I have 2 Verizon DSL lines, one is 1.5M down/128k up. The second is
768k/768k up and down. They both have dynamic IPs. My question is; Are
these
both ADSL lines? My boss thinkins the one 768k/768k is SDSL. I dont
think it
is, first of all, both lines have the same modem. If the one like was
ADSL
The information afterwards is not my words. I got it off of
www.examnotes.net. It was written by a guy that frequents their forums who
works in the telecom industry, doing work related to WAN type installations,
including DSL. Here's what he said about the subject:
ADSL. Asymmetric Digital
Guy- I don't know if there are any specific restrictions, but ADSL is
ADSL from what I've experienced.
You just have to work with the ISP to ensure you are both on the same
page about VPI/VCI parameters, and whether or not you need to activate
bridging on the router to translate the ATM packets
Mark W. Odette II wrote:
If you don't do the WIC-1ADSL, you will need the ISP's DSL modem, and a
1700 or 2600 series router with the WIC-1ENET module (supports PPPoE if
needed).
The WIC-1ENET seems to be compatible with most DSL implementations...
but you also can get away with any Cisco
Does anyone know if this ADSL router is compatible with Covad's ADSL
service? Couldn't find it on Cisco's website. Thanks.
Guy H. Lupi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53724t=53724
--
FAQ, list archives
Ok, not the 806 because that is dual Ethernet, should have checked the
product description more carefully. Does anyone know if Cisco sells an ADSL
router that will work with Covad's ADSL service?
-Original Message-
From: Lupi, Guy
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hi all,
Does someone (especially in France) try to aggregate two ADSL lines using
Multilink PPPoE ?
Does Cisco PPPoE client support this ? Does Freebsd support this ? Does the
DSLAMs (in France) support this feature ?
Thanks for help,
Stephane Litkowski
Message Posted at:
http
I think I was wrong, the problem is not the DSLAM, but the BAS ... so does
the BAS support this ?
Stephane Litkowski a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Does someone (especially in France) try to aggregate two ADSL lines using
Multilink PPPoE ?
Does Cisco PPPoE
Can someone tell me
What you call ADSL link? Is is it known as Dedicated line (like lease line)
?
Thanks
ashok
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52978t=52978
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
Hi
ADSL (assym Digital subscriber line) is used to deliver high rate data
over ordinary phonelines. A new modulation technique called DMT Discrete
multitone allows the hight speed
ADSL facilitates the simultaneous use of normal phones ervisces ISDN and
high speed transmissions
ADSL can also
Rarely is DSL used in a dedicated point-to-point manner...though it is
possible on a large campus between buildings. Most ADSL connections are
akin to a T1 line between you and your provider since you have, more or
less, a dedicated copper run between your house/business and your service
the 827 can do many things, including 3DES and firewall feature set, but
supports only RIP and EIGRP
--No fair, mine doesn't support EIGRP. Only RIP. The 827 looks like it
supports all of the routing protocols but when you enter them it always
reads unknown routing protocol. (Except for RIP.)
Cisco 1751 with ADSL WIC is the least expensive choice. If you play
your cards right, you could pick one up on Ebay WITH the DSP chip
included so that you could also play around with Voice Shtuff!
Granted your port density isn't the greatest, but the NM-xx is quite
expensive just to add extra
Can anyone suggest a good router to get for ADSL? I want to utilize a
full IOS, and not a dumbed down version. Or should I just go with a 2600
with an ADSL card. This firewall will be for a home connection, but I am
the type to mess around with the routers, try to do different things
with Pix
in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can anyone suggest a good router to get for ADSL? I want to utilize a
full IOS, and not a dumbed down version. Or should I just go with a 2600
with an ADSL card. This firewall will be for a home connection, but I am
the type to mes
I am running it on a cisco 515 UR with a 4-ethernet extension without any
problems.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: mardi 30 juillet 2002 17:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPPOE/ADSL on a PIX [7:50133]
I know 6.2(2) supports PPPoE, but has
What OS is he using? XP has the PPPoE stuff built in it. Just like you
add a dial up connection, you can add a ADSL connection.
-Original Message-
From: Derrick Monahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL - unable to reach
I know 6.2(2) supports PPPoE, but has anyone successfully used it on a
PIX 515 or any other model Pix? The documentation says it only is
supported on the 506 and 501.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50133t=50133
I have been setting up a DSL connection for a home user, but he is currently
unable to reach ANY website. I am able to ping IP addresses of servers on
the internet and get a reply. But, neither IE nor Netscape is able to reach
a single page (via IP or Name).
The DHCP servers gives his adapter an
Be sure that he is allowing the DNS port through on the DSL router.
Derrick Monahan wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have been setting up a DSL connection for a home user, but he is
currently
unable to reach ANY website. I am able to ping IP addresses of servers
and see if the PING
still works like it did.
-Original Message-
From: Derrick Monahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL - unable to reach URL's [7:50068]
I have been setting up a DSL connection for a home user, but he
Hi all,
I have been trying to search CCO and the archives( think the links are down
at the moment) for a IpSec VPN LAN (1720 with ADSL) to LAN (1720 with ADSL)
router configuration using Pre-share keys. Can someone post or point where
I can find this specfic configuration. I have
run
!
route-map nonat permit 10
match ip address 130
!
KM Reynolds wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I have been trying to search CCO and the archives( think the links are
down
at the moment) for a IpSec VPN LAN (1720 with ADSL) to LAN (1720 w
Guys,
Will anybody know is ppp multilink is possible over an adsl link and
does it work similar to isdn?
Regards,
George.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44704t=44704
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
I'm going to hazzard a guess here and see what others think of my theory.
For PPP Multilink to work you need it enabled at both ends. with
point-to-point T1s or ISDN this isn't a problem because you (usually)
control both ends But with ADSL, you only control one end (unless
But with ADSL, you only control one end (unless this
is the wierd point-to-point DSL that's being offered that I've just never
heard of). So I don't think this would be possible, because your DSL
provider would treat each connection separately (attempt to give an IP,
etc
at both ends. with
point-to-point T1s or ISDN this isn't a problem because you (usually)
control both ends But with ADSL, you only control one end (unless
this
is the wierd point-to-point DSL that's being offered that I've just
never
heard of). So I don't think this would be
to test if my Username and password is working for ADSL
?
My ISP (verizon, requires a U/P for PPPoE, I am not sure if it is
accepting the password. The modem lights are all green.
Anyhow, it's saying UP/UP, and I have the link up, but I am not sure how
to check if my PPPOE password is working
packets sent, 1023 received, 12641 bytes sent, 0 received
HTHs,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian Zeitz
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pix 515 on ADSL Help! :) [7:44346]
Well, I upgraded my pix
Is it possible to get the ADSL WIC running on a 1600 router?
~~~
Michael Jablonski
ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc.
161 North Clark St.
9th Flr
Chicago, IL 60601-2468
PH: 312.884.2996
FAX: 312.278.5550
I just did a quick look on Cisco's price list. That module is not listed for
the 1600 but is for the 1700.
-Original Message-
From: Jablonski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL - WIC 1600 [7:44042
Looking through Cisco's site; they don't officially say you can use the ADSL
wic in a 1600 (then again, they don't say you cannot). But I was
wondering if there was any type of upgrade/patch that would work?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
mean that it will function.
-Original Message-
From: Jablonski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Looking through Cisco's site; they don't officially say you
can use the ADSL
wic in a 1600 (then again, they don't say you cannot). But I was
wondering if there was any type
Nope, 1700, 2600, 3600, 3700.
Dave
Jablonski, Michael wrote:
Is it possible to get the ADSL WIC running on a 1600 router?
~~~
Michael Jablonski
ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc.
161 North Clark St.
9th Flr
Chicago, IL 60601-2468
PH: 312.884.2996
Folks,
1)Whats difference between ADSL and SDSL?
2)Can I have 2Pcs connected over ADSL or SDSL(Like Windows NT RAS)?
3)Does ADSL or SDSL need special telephone line or the existing line is
sufficient?
Cheers
R
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33144t=33144
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Ramesh c wrote:
Folks,
1)Whats difference between ADSL and SDSL?
adsl is asymmetric, so sownload speed exceeds upload, this is less
expensive. sdsl is often marketed as business class because upload and
download speeds are equal. Servers are sometimes more tolerated
I have a customer that has an ADSL line which uses PPPoE. They can establish
a VPN Tunnel, but the throughput drops to below 28KBS and the only packets
that seem to be able to traverse the tunnel are ICMP Pings. I was told that
there is a problem with establishing VPNs over a PPPoE ADSL
in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a customer that has an ADSL line which uses PPPoE. They can
establish
a VPN Tunnel, but the throughput drops to below 28KBS and the only packets
that seem to be able to traverse the tunnel are ICMP Pings. I was told
that
there is a
I have a customer with an ADSL line which uses PPPoE. They are able to
establish a VPN tunnel over the DSL line, but they are only able to ping
through the tunnel. TCP, UDP and other higher protocols will not work. I
heard that there is an issue with doing VPNs over PPPoE ADSL. Does anyone
know
a wild guess, packet frag issues? Try to ping with larger packets to test
this..
Brian Sonic Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Bruce Williams wrote:
I have a customer with an ADSL line which uses PPPoE. They are able to
establish a VPN tunnel over the DSL line
I have enhanced ADSL service with PBI here in San Jose and have purchased a
1751 with the WIC1ADSL. Do I need any information from PBI to configure
ADSL support? Has any list member in the Bay Area configured ADSL with
PBI? I've seen some sample configurations but do not know if they apply
oh, and btw, the bridging commands mentioned are plain wrong (or should I
say unnecessary), and would at best, achieve nothing.
Nick
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29325t=29175
--
FAQ, list archives, and
I sould give support to a customer who is testing DHCP out of his local lan.
He has a cisco 1750 and he provided me the configuration.
In my humble opionion there is something wrong in the configuration I'm
sending you below, and I'd like to have your opinion.
I don't understand the ADSL solution
Hi,
Who has Cisco 827 ADSL router experience, please help. This is a real
emergency, not only today is Sunday I am still on the site to figure out
what is going on here, but also the company complains too much because they
can not remotely access.
The problem is like this:
After you reboot
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Shawn Xu
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco 827 ADSL Emergency Help [7:27945]
Hi,
Who has Cisco 827 ADSL router experience, please help. This is a real
emergency, not only today
Hello , Guys...
I met a problem in my new case
The HQ is using Cisco 3640 connected two ATM E1
and there is seven branch office connected with two ADSL (One is primary
use , one is backup use)
Now , the situation is , how can I config the router with running BGP...
In the condition of is I
I finally got it through my thick head that it was a *bridged* connection,
and set up IRB.
Sure enough, I was then able to ping the next hop address with packets
sourced from the public IP I was given. However, I seem to be unable to
hit anything outside that particular subnet, and I'm not sure
After much experimentation and much frustration, I finally solved the
problem with my BVI interface. It turns out that removing the default
route pointing at the BVI1 interface and replacing it with a default route
pointing at the next-hop IP address fixed the problem.
How does your router
why. If I
try and ping www.yahoo.com, for instance, I get no response. This is true
if I ping from the internal network (and thus NAT) or if I ping sourced
from the BVI interface (avoiding NAT).
It all works fine if I use the external ADSL bridge. Ideas?
Relevant config:
!
!
bridge irb
.
-Mark Odette II
StellarConnection Services
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ben Hockenhull
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL/BVI problems [7:23535]
I finally got it through my thick head
At 2:27 PM -0400 10/19/01, Mark Odette II wrote:
Ben,
I could be wrong, and you're using a new angle I've never seen before on
implementing NAT,
But I think your problem is this:
You need to specify a NAT Pool, and the Access-List 152 is applied to that
pool, rather than what you're trying to
I have an ADSL link that works fine with an ADSL bridge plugged into it.
I'm trying to make it work with a 1750 and a WIC-1ADSL and can't seem to
make it happen.
Has anyone done this, and if so, do you have a sample working config?
The cisco docs that cover bridged DSL aren't appropriate, as I
encapsulation aal5snap
!
HTH
Chuck
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ben Hockenhull
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADSL config [7:23456]
I have an ADSL link that works fine with an ADSL bridge plugged
, and converts to decimal 35.
Here's the output of a sho int, in case that reveals anything useful:
ATM0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is DSLSAR (with Alcatel ADSL Module)
MTU 1500 bytes, sub MTU 1500, BW 160 Kbit, DLY 12800 usec,
reliability 248/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
some comments / questions below:
-Original Message-
From: Ben Hockenhull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:46 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL config [7:23456]
At 6:22 PM -0700 10/18/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
the following
triggers.
I'm still unclear on why I need to set up bridging, unless I need to be
sending BPDUs to the DSLAM or something. If the ADSL interface is
configured with the PVC information and has an IP, why can't it just
encapsulate the frames and send them down the wire without the benefit
Anybody have a sample config for the adsl wic connecting to Pacbell DSL?
Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22048t=22048
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
