actually rip is faster than IGRP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) a icrit dans le
message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to
RIP/RIPv2.
Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-)
It
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I have been using EIGRP for our routing protocol for the last couple
years,
which is prettly great. The controversal of selecting the routing
protocol
came up again recently. I would like to have your opinion on EIGRP vs.
OSPF, which one is
EIGRP easy to configure optimised for Cisco kit. Use OSPF if mixed vendor
environment and if network is large scale. Requires good configurqtion
knowledge as much less plug and play than EIGRP. Also OSPF is true link
state so faster convergence and better scalability. EIGRP is enhanced
distance
OSPF
no hop limit
link state
have 2 know how to configure it
bandwith is the metric
supportes areas therefore scalls well
supports area and net summarization
supportes cidr, vlsm
fast to converge
supports demand cicuits
standard based
djikstra is the algo
used in large environments
EIGRP
advanced
Good answers. Here are a few additional comments.
OSPF is an IETF standard, which has the following advantages:
You have access to the RFCs that describe it, which can help when
troubleshooting and designing network changes, even though the RFCs aren't
very readable.
Engineers from around the
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
EIGRP is not an IETF standard. You said below that the spec if available,
but that's not true. Cisco has lots of documentaton on EIGRP but they have
not released a specification for it.
AFAIK there used to be another company who manufactured routers
Interesting! I learned OSPF on BSCN book but never deploy it. EIGRP has
been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to RIP/RIPv2.
It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if
OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths? Thanks All for the
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to
RIP/RIPv2.
Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-)
It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if
OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths?
to routed protocols as
well...I've just never heard it used for them before. :-)
BJ
- Original Message -
From: Fred Danson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:50 PM
Subject: RE: EIGRP and OSPF
Wait a sec, I thought ships in the night meant that 2 ROUTED protocols are
running
the
method for configuring two different routable *network* protocols
independently (for example, AppleTalk and IP)
- Original Message -
From: "Bradley J. Wilson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "cisco" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:25 AM
Subject: Re: EIG
hough I suppose it could also be applied to routed protocols as
well...I've just never heard it used for them before. :-)
BJ
- Original Message -
From: Fred Danson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:50 PM
Subject: RE: EIGRP and OSPF
Wait a sec, I thought ships in
Yes you can .they are ships in the night. The never see each other.
Raul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EIGRP and OSPF
Hi All - Is it possible to have
Yes, you can have both on the same router. But if you just want to migrate
away from RIP, why would you choose to use both of them? It would be better
to pick one and be done with it. If you're an all-Cisco shop, you could go
with EIGRP unless you foresee adding non-cisco routers in the future.
"Thomas" ,
Subject: RE: EIGRP and OSPF Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:42:55 -0400
Yes you can .they are ships in the night. The never see each other.
Raul
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Sent: Tuesday, April 03,
2001
ROUTED protocols are
running concurrently without knowledge of eachother.
Running 2 routing
protocols has nothing to do with ships in the night,
right?
Fred
From: "Raul F. Fernandez" Reply-To: "Raul F.
Fernandez" To: "Thomas" ,
Subject: RE: EIGRP and
Chuck,
OH YES!! It's going to be a good day! LOL
Your analysis of the serial/ethernet is right on: this is exactly what I
had in mind. This is actually an idea a friend of mine came up with to link
EIGRP over disparate and wildly varying routing protocols: he came up with
3
I've actually done something like this in a lab. I wrote about it on the
list a few months back. I am e-mailing you the configs in a separate
message. ( too big for Paul to let through to the list ) but a relevant
excerpt follows:
Router A
interface Tunnel0
ip address 172.17.1.1 255.255.0.0
Of course, Charles, I'll lay odds you won't get end to end ip connectivity
anyway, given that mess you have created in the middle! :-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Cthulu, CCIE Candidate
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 5:15
Chuck,
Bless you for the configs, though I am put out that this one did not give
you pause...damn, I must be slipping;]I think I could attain
connectivity with this...reliability, stability, usuability, routability,
now that is another matter!
Many thanks again, I will be looking over the
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Cthulu, CCIE Candidate wrote:
Anyways, I got another one:
Given:
EIGRP 1 RTRA OSPF RTB BGP RTR C OSPF RTRD EIGRP1
I want RTRD and RTRA to become EIGRP peers and do the exchange routing
update thing. Granted, they are not directly
You know, Charles, I've been pondering this setup for a while now. ( See -
you did too get me after all! :- )
Now I already posted the wisecrack about the mess in the middle, and whether
or not you would even be able to get IP connectivity end to end here.
RouterA: ethernet EIGRP, serial=OSPF
Turn on no auto summary on the eigrp router
- Original Message -
From: Radford Dion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:51 AM
Subject: EIGRP and OSPF
Has anyone out there ever integrated OSPF and EIGRP?
We have a requirement where we want to take
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EIGRP and OSPF
1. You need to assign a default-metric or specify the metric at the end
of
your redistribute commands
2. Under EIGRP try the command 'no auto-summary'
example:
Router A
router ospf 100
redistribute static subents metric 100
network
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Matt C. Lange wrote:
I have eigrp and OSPF running in my home lab(5 rouetrs total)
Try not redistributing static routes but ospf into eogrp and eigrp into
ospf. This works for me. I will send you the config of the router doing the
redistribution.
This is a bad idea
24 matches
Mail list logo
