If you word the subject properly, it makes life easy.( for > 1 people )
Couldnt " Hyperterm Problem" be a better subject for this than a " why"
Why not !
-Original Message-
From:cslx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:47:42 +0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Have your checked your timeouts? Email me if you need help.
Sincerely,
Peter Kurdziel
CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, MCP+I
http://www.inotez.com
Cisco Q&A
http://www.inotez.com/discus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
cslx
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 200
yup, check the console line
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
Sam LI
- Original Message -
From: Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'cslx' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 8:09 AM
Subject: RE: why?
> Have your checked your
At 04:47 PM 10/22/2000 +0800, cslx wrote:
I am assuming you are using a terminal server here? Try having this
in your config for your terminal server:
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
line 1 8
no exec
transport input all
V.
I use the line to connect with the
console of 2501 and the serial of t
If anything, it has a lot to do with the fact that SNA is VERY
time-critical.. it doesn't care how FAST a link is, but rather that it
recieves its packets in a relatively predictable time period.. it doesn't
like it to take 15ms for the first packet.. 33ms for the second.. 12ms for
the third.. and
Original message from:
"Pradeep Kumar"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>If you word the subject properly, it makes life easy.( >for > 1 people )
>Couldnt " Hyperterm Problem" be a better subject for >this than a " why"
>Why not !
Couldn't you have just answered the guys question? It makes life easy f
Outside of anything more "best practice design" specific which others are and I'm sure
will cover, I would look at your 100 meg downlinks (connections from edge switches to
aggregation switches back to 5500 in increasing order of importance) Specifically,
check to ensure that your duplexes on
all 5
of these "edge" switches connect to another switch of
the same model with a 100Mbit multi-mode (1300
nanometer) fiber uplink which connects to a Cisco
Catalyst 5500 for our routing needs.
hmmm... "connects to a Cisco Catalyst 5500 for our routing needs."
How is the 5500 doing routing?
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why not supernetting?
Outside of anything more "best practice design" specific which others are
and I'm sure will cover, I would look at your 100 meg downlinks (connections
from edge switches to aggregation switches back to 5500 in increasing order
of importance
Your problem seems to be insufficient hardware.
Supernetting five subnets and putting 500 stations on one segement will
cripple your network.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Groupstudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:13 PM
Subj
On Behalf Of
Donald B Johnson Jr
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:00 AM
To: jeongwoo park; Groupstudy
Subject: Re: Why not supernetting?
Your problem seems to be insufficient hardware.
Supernetting five subnets and putting 500 stations on one segement will
cripple your
but machines are predictible.
Habeeb
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Larrieu [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:47 AM
> To: Donald B Johnson Jr; jeongwoo park; Groupstudy
> Subject: RE: Why not supernetting?
>
> Just to be arg
Yes we are using RSM for routing need.
And I am not sure if we are using vlan because
cat5500, and DHCP is out of my control. How can I
verify if we are using vlan?
It seems to me that we are using vlan because more
than one subnet sits on the same physical edge switch,
witch I am sure if it is co
I couldn't agree more, a multiport switch connected to the router, then
another switch for each area of worksations is the way I would go.
Bri
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Donald B Johnson Jr wrote:
> Your problem seems to be insufficient hardware.
> Supernetting five subnets and puttin
You guys must be integrators! She has a 5500 already, which although somewhat dated,
should be able to provide enough horsepower to route to 600 users in 5 or 6 subnets
surely.
I highly expect her issue is not lack of hardware related. I expect there is a
misconfiguration or faulty cabling a
The command bandwidth does not set the bandwidth of the serial port to the
value you assign ... it is used by the router to calculate routing metrics
for some routing protocols,
If you want to change the bandwidth of the port u shold better use "clock
rate" command...
Gugana
-Original Mess
Mustafa Kemal Furat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
B190548C7CC1D41182500048541277A41EAF2E@INET">news:B190548C7CC1D41182500048541277A41EAF2E@INET...
>
> The command bandwidth does not set the bandwidth of the serial port to
the
> value you assign ... it is used by the router to calcu
Folks,
A very good explanation ( by Lisa Phifer, Core Competence ) of where NAT and
IPSec are in harmony and where they are not can be found at :
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/759/ipj_3-4/ipj_3-4_nat.html
Happy reading.
Aziz S. Islam
_
FAQ, list archives, a
Hello,
>1. Is there any advantage/disadvantage of having many buffers compared to
>having one or two only.
Usually Data packets come in different sizes, therefor it's efficient to
categorize
these sizes into predetermined one. For example if you dont have categories of
buffers, and only have o
If you can believe the CIT class, the small, middle, big, very big, large,
and huge buffers are used for process switching. These are the buffers that
you track with the "show buffers" command. These buffers are in system
memory and they generally get used if you have disabled fast switching an
>Thanks.
>
> -Original Message-
>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:28 AM
>To: CCIE TB; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:Re: Why so many buffers ?
>
>If you can believe the CIT class, the small, midd
You can buy the book CCIE ALL IN ONE LAB STUDY GUIDE,it's very useful.
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ,
Does anyone know of a website that provide lab scenarios free of charge
(except FatKid.com) for those
individuals that already have all the lab equipment needed?
FatKid is an excellent resource, but I would like to find other sites that
may offer
scenarios which they do not yet provide
Thanks,
: Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
Subject: RE: Why people prefer ccbootcamp.com??
Does anyone know of a website that provide lab scenarios free of charge
(except FatKid.com) for those
individuals that already have all the lab equipment needed?
FatKid is an excellent resource, but I would like to find other
land Brett Contr USAFE IN/SAIC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Eitland Brett Contr USAFE IN/SAIC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Why people prefer ccbootcamp.com??
>Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:58:33 +0200
&g
The SMF is basically a 256Gbps switching fabric. The 6000 family has a
32Gbps bus communications system built into it. There are 3 types of cards
for the 6000 series. Non-fabric enabled, fabric-enabled, and fabric-only.
The non-fabric enabled can only use the 32Gbps bus (to talk to the Sup/MSFC
Can we determine if we have SFM cards?
We have 2 x 6509's with Sup1A and MSFC2/PFC. We have dual 16GBIC line cards
(32 in total) and we are using ALL of them. If we have the 32gbps backplane,
and our 32 sockets maxed out (this isnt including the 4 x 48port ethernet
line cards we have) then we wou
not necessarily, a lot of the processing for port to port is done on the
line cards..
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Keen"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: why SFM? [7:42877]
> Can we determine i
> Larry Letterman
> Cisco Systems
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kris Keen"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:42 PM
> Subject: Re: why SFM? [7:42877]
>
>
> > Can we determine if we have SFM cards?
> >
> > We have
Do you mean a Fabric enabled line cards of the SFM itself???
dave
Kris Keen wrote:
>
> Can we determine if we have SFM cards?
>
> We have 2 x 6509's with Sup1A and MSFC2/PFC. We have dual 16GBIC line cards
> (32 in total) and we are using ALL of them. If we have the 32gbps
backplane,
> and o
Thank you for the information. I am stuggling with the use/purpose of VLANs
and you've answered some questions for me.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Neiberger) wrote:
>A VLAN is, by definition, a separate subnet. If you decided to separate a
>single LAN into two VLANs
I got your e-mail fine! Just a thought: Are you using some type of mail
encryption?
Pierre-Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Circusnuts
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why are my posts so disto
do i have to erase the flash totally to upgrade the ios ,then copy the
vcw-vfc-mz.c549.mc.7.23.bin back?
"Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
93re40$ffa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:93re40$ffa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I want to upgrade the ios ,and i want to keep the
> vcw-vfc-mz.c549.mc.7.23.b
Frank,
After you delete it don't forget to squeeze it. When
you delete it you are only marking it for deletion.
Squeezing flash actually gets rid of the file.
HTH,
AQ
At 11:49 PM 1/13/01, Frank wrote:
>do i have to erase the flash totally to upgrade the ios ,then copy the
>vcw-vfc-mz.c549.mc.
Frank,
Depending on the device you are using you may or may not need to delete
the entire flash to recover the space. If the device you are using is
an AS5300 as the IOS images indicate, it uses a "Class B" file system
and, according to Cisco documentation, you will need to erase the flash
to re
If I understand your question correctlyhere's a response
A router operates at Layer 3 while all the switching you are discussing =
is
happening at Layer 2. In order for a switch to forward packets to any =
VLAN
it would have to also re-write the packet so that he destination =
workstatio
Keep in mind that seperate VLANs will be seperate subnets. Which means
that by default a host will encapsulate any IP packet destined for a
different VLAN within an ethernet packet with a destination MAC address of
the default gateway. So a layer 2 switch will never get the chance to try
and
A VLAN is, by definition, a separate subnet. If you decided to separate a
single LAN into two VLANs, you'll have to change your addressing scheme.
Once you've done that, you have to route to get from one subnet to the
other. I don't even like the term "VLAN". The very term seems to cause a
lot
NEED A JOB ???
http://www.oledrews.com/job
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: why is routing needed with VLANs
ger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Bob Vance; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: why is routing needed with VLANs
A VLAN is, by definition, a separate subnet. If you decided to separate
a
single LAN into two VLANs, you'll have to change your addressing sc
A VLAN is, by definition, a separate subnet. If you decided to separate a
single LAN into two VLANs, you'll have to change your addressing scheme.
Once you've done that, you have to route to get from one subnet to the
other. I don't even like the term "VLAN". The very term seems to cause a
lot
ww.oledrews.com/ccnp
NEED A JOB ???
http://www.oledrews.com/job
-Original Message-
From: Bob Vance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 11:58 AM
To: CISCO_GroupStudy List (E-mail)
Subject: RE: w
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:48 PM
> To: Bob Vance; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: why is routing needed with VLANs
>
>
> A VLAN is, by definition, a separate s
At 12:28 PM 1/16/2001 -0600, Ole Drews Jensen wrote:
>Now, with all devices at that office connecting to a cheap hub, wouldn't
>this work okay, or would the best thing be to statically NAT 214.100.200.70
>to a dedicated address on the 192.168.20.0 network which then is assigned
>the printer?
You
R Enterprises, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp
>
> NEED A JOB ???
> http://www.oledrews.com/job
> ~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Vance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Inside users would use the inside IP for the printer.
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/
"Brian Hartsfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[
Comments Inline
At 11:43 AM 1/16/01 -0600, you wrote:
>Hmm, I think I know what the question is, however I don't really have an
>answer right now if I'm right.
>
>Picture two different scenarios:
>
><<1>>
>
>Workstation A, B and C are connected to a switch that IS NOT running VLAN,
>hence they ar
ECTED]
Subject: RE: why is routing needed with VLANs
Comments Inline
At 11:43 AM 1/16/01 -0600, you wrote:
>Hmm, I think I know what the question is, however I don't really have an
>answer right now if I'm right.
>
>Picture two different scenarios:
>
><<1>>
Just for clarity, VLAN's are a layer 2 concept and IP is of course a layer 3 (please
do not start with the "but what layer is arp again" :)
Despite subnets and VLAN's generally happening on a 1:1 basis in a lot of theoretical
and practical discussions, the two concepts are totally unrelated a
th, GA 30097-1511
=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Peter Van Oene
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: why is routing needed with VLANs
Just fo
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Peter Van Oene
>Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:26 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: why is routing needed
11455 Lakefield Dr.
Fax 770-623-3429 Duluth, GA 30097-1511
=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Peter Van Oene
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLANs can be defined by MAC address or IP address.
When MAC address is used, you have a layer 2 VLAN, when IP address is used you have a
layer 3 VLAN and a router is needed.
Layer 2 VLANs mostly used for filtering (never done, I supose is a hard work to
mantain)
Peter Van Oene wrote:
> Just f
To me, there is no concept of a layer three VLAN. If you chose to route IP, you need
a router, whether you have dynamic or statically configured broadcast scopes is fully
irrelevant. If you are talking about dynamic VLAN membership based on IP address (or
protocol for that matter), then I wil
are we talking about the difference between collision domains and broadcast domains?
>>> "Peter Van Oene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/18/01 09:07AM >>>
To me, there is no concept of a layer three VLAN. If you chose to route IP, you need
a router, whether you have dynamic or statically configured bro
Actually not. Collision domains have a layer 1 scope (assuming CSMA/CD media), and
broadcast domains a layer 2 scope.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/18/2001 at 9:39 AM Lowell Sharrah wrote:
>are we talking about the difference between collision domains and broadcast domains?
nuary 18, 2001 8:08 AM
To: Ruben Arias; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: why is routing needed with VLANs
To me, there is no concept of a layer three VLAN. If you chose to route
IP, you need a router, whether you have dynamic or statically configured
broadcast scopes is fully irrele
First of all, if I send this twice, excuse me...I am trying out outlook
express and I am not sure it is sending anything...but I have a couple of
questions and comments.
Questions:
So the only reason vlans are implemented then is for a "type of subnet" that
controls broadcasts from a layer 2
Sorry, I was trying to make a puzzle with the words, instead I did a lot of noise in
the line, looks like I have to improve my language!
Peter Van Oene wrote:
> To me, there is no concept of a layer three VLAN. If you chose to route IP, you
>need a router, whether you have dynamic or statica
for support more application.
"CCIE TB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi group members
>
> In TP cables we have eight wires. Only four are used. Why we need the
other
> four. The same thing applies to DB-25 and other types of cables. We don't
>
Where I work, we have many Terminals in use (Memorex/Telex). When the cables
for these were punchced down (Years ago), they decided to save money by
using 25 pair Cat5 and only punching down one pair for each terminal. Now we
are ready to upgrade to IP-based terminals (MTX 1683) and PCs in some ar
I was wondering that myself.
Here are the top 10 possibilities, tung and cheek of course.
10) Copper mines are owned by Cisco!
9) It's a union thing, here's 20 bucks please don't ask again!
8) 4 more wires are there in case we forget the IEEE chapter of the
networking manual, whoops!
7) For colo
Some technologies do use all 8 wires. IE Gig E over copper uses all 4 pair.
At 10:36 PM 9/18/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi group members
>
>In TP cables we have eight wires. Only four are used. Why we need the
>other four. The same thing applies to DB-25 and other types of cables. We
>don't use a
100 Base T uses 2 pair (CAT 5)
100 Base T4 uses 4 pair (CAT 3 - 4)
"CCIE TB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi group members
>
> In TP cables we have eight wires. Only four are used. Why we need the
other
> four. The same thing applies to DB-2
>Hi group members
>
>In TP cables we have eight wires. Only four are used. Why we need
>the other four. The same thing applies to DB-25 and other types of
>cables. We don't use all of the wires. Why?
>
>Regards to all
>
For the RJ45 connector used with ISDN, the intention of the standards
bodi
I have pulled Cat 5 cable, some 20 to 30 1000' spools,
in the last 2 years (about 5 miles of cable).
One time, on a run of about 500', I had a break in one
of the wires required for Ethernet.
Instead of pulling the wire over again, I changed the
color coding at each end and had a working cable.
, September 19, 2000 9:43 AM
To: CCIE TB; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Why 8 wires in RJ-45?
I have pulled Cat 5 cable, some 20 to 30 1000' spools,
in the last 2 years (about 5 miles of cable).
One time, on a run of about 500', I had a break in one
of the wires required for Ethernet.
Instead
On Feb 8, 5:12pm, "CCIE TB" wrote:
}
} In TP cables we have eight wires. Only four are used. Why we need the other
} four. The same thing applies to DB-25 and other types of cables. We don't
} use all of the wires. Why?
Because the standard actually comes from the telephony industry,
whe
Additionally, the new IP Phones from Cisco can utilize the 'extra' pairs to power the
telephones.
Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738
Systems Engineer
Cisco Systems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates
Future Needs. You are right that 10BaseT and 100BaseT do not use more than
4 wires, but 100VGLAN and 100Base4 do. Those specifications used the extra
wires to transmit data at a slower speed. When you add up the additional
data lines multiple, 4, by the slower speed, 25Mb, you get 100Mb
transm
> Subject: Why 8 wires in RJ-45?
>
> > Hi group members
> >
> > In TP cables we have eight wires. Only four are used. Why we need the
> other
> > four. The same thing applies to DB-25 and other types of cables. We don't
> > use all of the wires. Why?
> >
> > Regards to all
> >
> >
I was wondering
""¡Shawn.!"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8q7lvt$16d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8q7lvt$16d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 100 Base T uses 2 pair (CAT 5)
Technically "100baseTX", no? I thought "100baseT" was a generic term
referring to either TX or T4. I'd also really like to know what the official
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> HP 100VG was a short lived 100 mbps networking technology that used all
> eight wires. This enabled it to even run over category 3 cable as long as
> none of the wires was being used for phone services.
Ah, 100V
Title: RE: Why 8 wires in RJ-45?
This is not quite true. You need to stipulate the caveat that 10BaseT and 100BaseT Ethernet in *half-duplex* do not use all 4 pair. Full-duplex communication *does* require the additional pairs.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: David L. Blair [mailto
David
100BaseT4 uses a standard RJ-45 connector with the same pinout as the
10BaseT specification, plus two bidirectional pairs (transmit on 1 and 2,
receive on 3 and 6; bidirectional on 4 and 5; bidirectional on 7 and 8).
Ajaz
""David L. Blair"" <> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[
It was a compromise. Data people wanted no less than 128bytes and Voice
people wanted no more than 32 bytes. SO a compromise was reached.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Xing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 October 2000 08:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why 53-bytes for a cell?
You must be refering to ATM. The reason it's 53 bytes in a cell because
the first 5 bytes are used for cell-header information; the other 48 bytes
contain the payload, which is data.
Cheers,
Frank Kim, MCSE, CCNA
Comegetus Technologies
Phone: 858-831-0296
Fax: 858-831-0687
Email: [EMAIL PROT
>You must be refering to ATM. The reason it's 53 bytes in a cell because
>the first 5 bytes are used for cell-header information; the other 48 bytes
>contain the payload, which is data.
I think his question was directed as to why those specific mechanics,
rather than the mechanics themselves. A
Because back when they were creating an ATM standard
from stratch it had to be some number. I believe there
were two factions (US vs. European) on what size the
payload area should be. 48 bytes turned out to be the
compromise between speed and size.
--- Andy Xing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Than
Because when they said so thats why >;-('
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Andy Xing
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 2:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why 53-bytes for a cell?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> _
It is due to political reason. Politic again. One party want 64 byte for the
payload. Another party want 32 byte for the payload. They can't settle so
they choose the middle. (32+64)/2 = 48 byte.
"Frank Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You must be refer
I read in one of the books I have used there were not an specific
reason to define exactly a 53 Bytes cell in ATM, it was really an
agreement between the two leaders developing ATM architecture (USA and
Europe)where one defined a cell smaller than 50 bytes (sorry, but I do
not remember the exact s
This is my understanding as well. This was a pure political decision that led to a
pretty horrible technical result. The systems we work with like powers of 2. They woek
ok with other composites. They DO NOT like primes. 53 is a prime number and this must
cause no end of headaches to someone in
Ask the French...
>From: "Andy Xing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Andy Xing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Why 53-bytes for a cell?
>Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:58:33 +0800
>
>Thanks
>
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http
Compromised between Europe and US.
As I recalled from ATM/UNI forum,
Europe wanted 64 US wanted 32, they
compromised at 48 (in between) + 5
for control.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Xing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I read a few of the entries to answer your question and I disagree with them
so far. I have read that in fact there were 2 committees involved with the
established cell size, and it was in fact a compromise. I wished I had my
book Computer Networks (which is a wonderful book) cause then I would
after i ran the command "deb asy s"
Async interface state changes debugging is on
i tried again ,got such info ,hope it helps you to find the problem .
thanks.
01:22:50: As65 PPP: Async Protocol Mode started for 172.20.112.11
01:22:50: As65 AAA/ACCT: Using PPP accounting list ""
01:22:52: %LINK-
i have solved the problem ,nothing is wrong ,i just changed the pwd "cisco"
to another one
,then Ok,i dont' know why .
thanks a lot.
"Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8vdvsn$lem$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8vdvsn$lem$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> when i dialed a 3640 router ,i got the following e
1. Transport non-IP routable protocols over an IP backbone (Appletalk, IPX,
DECnet)
2. Transport encrypted IP VPNs so they pass routing protocol
3. Reduce the diameter of an IP network by eliminating routing hops over
the tunnel created
-e-
- Original Message -
From: "Rashid Lohiya"
I have this configuration in production:
branch office lan cisco 2611 Cisco 7206 running BGP Cisco 2611 branch
office lan
I have a /24 from one of my three BGP peers which is used for most
everything in my
network and there is a sloppy deploy of RFC1918 private addresses on two
branch
GO TO SLEEP NEAL!
- Original Message -
From: "Neal Rauhauser"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: Why use GRE Tunnels [7:6155]
> I have this configuration in production:
>
>
> branch office lan cisco 2611 Cisco 7206 running BGP Cisco 261
I've used a GRE tunnel to get multicast traffic through a PIX.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6279&t=6155
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
Well thanx for your input guys
I have just successfully labbed my first GRE tunnel at home, but couldn't
find anything useful or exciting to do with it.
thanx, (especially to Neal), Now I have lots of ideas to be getting on with.
Regards,
Rashid
"Rashid Lohiya" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTE
Set up an OSPF virtual link across it ;->
Chuck
(A joking reference to a recent thread.)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Rashid Lohiya
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why use
I think is all originated from the principles of:
1 = Do not Cares (Matches everything and anything)
0 = Cares ( Matches only identical corresponding digit)
Maybe it is a hang-on from the old binary digit stuff. Man you have no
choice than to do the inverse, else your access-list would not work,
I asked one of the IOS developers about it, and he pointed out that
access lists were developed before subnetting. The wildcard mask is
the natural way hardware does matching.
When subnets were defined, their documentation specified subnet
masks. With 20/20 hindsight, it might have been a goo
Yes, it does make simple tasks a little more complicated. However, using
inverse masking can make complex tasks much easier.
Take this issue. Say you are asked to filter access to all odd 192.168.x.0
/24 routes.
Your method.
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
192.168.5.0 255.2
prior to IOS 12.x, the wild card mask method alowed quite a bit of
flexibility. Suppose you had all of your serers on a particular subnet, but
you wanted a different subset of those servers to be accessible from
different subnets. It used to be that you could specify something like
access-list 10
>Yes, it does make simple tasks a little more complicated. However, using
>inverse masking can make complex tasks much easier.
>
>Take this issue. Say you are asked to filter access to all odd 192.168.x.0
>/24 routes.
>
>
>Your method.
>
>192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
>192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
>192.1
>With the advent of IOS 12.x wildcard bits must be contiguous from the right,
>so you lose this kind of power. Also takes the fun out of the network
>a.b.c.d x.x.x.x area command in OSPF!
I hadn't noticed that. If so, it would not surprise me at all if
Cisco is planning, long-term, to have one k
1 - 100 of 419 matches
Mail list logo
