If you're trying to use the modular QoS CLI on subinterfaces its
something of a mess - you have to create 'backpressure' at the physical
interface level so bandwidth available is less than what your policy
needs, or everything stays FIFO.
I had a production network with t
Hi
I'm trying to do policy based routing on a FE subinterface on a 7200 and am
having problems at present, i.e. not working. I'm not sure if the router
doesn't do PBR on subinterfaces or if I need a newer IOS version. I'm
currently running 12.0.15.S3
Any help appreciated.
B
Thanks Everyone for all your suggestions. I searched on setting up Back to
Back Frame Relay and sure enough, the link to the particular Cisco Webpage
was still there. I printed it out and should be moving on in my Labs
today. I really appreciate all your help and hope I can return the favor to
o
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Yes, when I say frame relay back to back or point to point I mean that
you can have one router's serial directly connected to another's and run
frame relay sub interfaces on each, with no frame switch. Unfortunately
I
2500's and 1 2600. It has been working great and I have always been very
> pleased with the Sybex Series. Unfortunately they have never covered
> Subinterfaces well enough and many of the Labs In the CCNP BSCI book are
> using
> them without much explanation. They have various La
orized it, I am sure
someone on the list does though.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Orabone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Thanks for the detailed description Guy. That helps
frame-relay interface dlci x" command on
the physical interface though that doesn't make it right:)
Dave
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Raj Singh
>Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:00 PM
Thanks for the detailed description Guy. That helps quite a bit. I think
maybe the Book just assumes that when you see IP's on Serial Subinterfaces,
you will understand that Frame Relay Encapsulation was set up on them ahead
of time and just skips ahead to the OSPF, IS-IS configurations.
right now
but I am sure it is in the archives somewhere.
-Original Message-
From: Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Could someone help a CCNP student who is really confu
Hi Rich,
The moment you configure a subint on an int, the int does not sense
anything layer 3. when your csu or in your case the routers are connected
together the int will show up-up.For the subint to sh up-up your layer must
be ok, therefore your ip address must be properly configured.
You theref
on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Use the frame relay for subinterfaces. You use subinterfaces to connect
multiple frame relay location to the hub.
Raj
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http
Use the frame relay for subinterfaces. You use subinterfaces to connect
multiple frame relay location to the hub.
Raj
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74857&t=74854
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchas
vered
Subinterfaces well enough and many of the Labs In the CCNP BSCI book are
using
them without much explanation. They have various Labs that use OSPF, IS-IS,
BGP etc. to route IP over Serial Subinterfaces on what I see as just a
"Plain
old LAN". All they do is show the IP Address
Zsombor Papp wrote:
>
> At 10:21 PM 6/26/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> >Oh. Your message didn't say anything about IPX.
>
> Right. I was talking about layer 2 encapsulations. I thought
> that the fact
> that *Cisco IOS* supports this configuration only for IPX is
> irrelevant.
I don
At 10:21 PM 6/26/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Oh. Your message didn't say anything about IPX.
Right. I was talking about layer 2 encapsulations. I thought that the fact
that *Cisco IOS* supports this configuration only for IPX is irrelevant.
Maybe I was wrong, see below.
>Ethernet
Zsombor Papp wrote:
>
> At 04:44 PM 6/26/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > > In fact I seem to remember that you *had* to specify it on
> a
> > subinterface level
> > > for a while, and it was in fact the encapsulation type that
> selected the
> > > subinterface. The reason for this beh
At 04:44 PM 6/26/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > In fact I seem to remember that you *had* to specify it on a
> subinterface level
> > for a while, and it was in fact the encapsulation type that selected the
> > subinterface. The reason for this behavior is that "Ethernet" has two
> >
uter that is doing inter-VLAN
routing and needs to tag frames and you want to specify ISL or IEEE 802.1Q
tagging. In general you can't specify the encapsulation used on Ethernet
interfaces or subinterfaces.
802.1Q isn't really an encapsulation, in that it inserts a shim rather than
su
t; Larry Letterman
> Cisco Systems
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Srivathsan Ananthachari
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Subinterfac
/
>
> Srivathsan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mwalie W
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Subinterfaces [7:71421]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Well, encapsulation
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Mwalie W
>Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:42 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Subinterfaces [7:71421]
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Well, encapsulation is done prior to placing the packets(Frames) to the
>physical
Hi,
I think your questions are quite in order and there is no reason to feel
that you are dragging it on
What is the purpose of encapsulation (data-link layer)? To enable
transportation of upper-layer data on the physical medium, right?
It may help in this particular case to look at, for ex
sday, June 26, 2003 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Subinterfaces [7:71421]
Hi,
Well, encapsulation is done prior to placing the packets(Frames) to the
physical medium - I guess it should be done on the physical interface.
I would be interested in what other members have to say, but
Larry,
That is very correct, I think, and in a way agrees indirectly with my
reasoning :)
Mwalie
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71426&t=71421
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Hi,
Well, encapsulation is done prior to placing the packets(Frames) to the
physical medium - I guess it should be done on the physical interface.
I would be interested in what other members have to say, but I think it
makes sense that it should be on the physical interface.
Mwalie
Message Pos
, June 25, 2003 10:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Subinterfaces [7:71421]
Hi,
Any ideas on why encapsulation is not allowed on individual FR
subinterfaces but rather on the physical interface only..??
TIA
Srivathsan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&a
Hi,
Any ideas on why encapsulation is not allowed on individual FR
subinterfaces but rather on the physical interface only..??
TIA
Srivathsan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71421&t=71421
--
FAQ, list
Watch for wrap:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/
tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a0080114326.shtml
neil K wrote:
> Can somebody tell me how to configure LLQ on Ethernet subinterfaces
> connected to two VLAN's.
> Will appreciate it.
Message Posted at:
http://www.
Can somebody tell me how to configure LLQ on Ethernet subinterfaces
connected to two VLAN's.
Will appreciate it.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70020&t=70020
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscripti
Hi
I am configuring a cisco WIC card with integrated CSU/DSU for frame Relay .
The WIC interface will have many subinterfaces.
Does anyone has a sample config ?
interface serial0
no ip address
encapsulation frame relay
interface serial0.52
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay
I don't think this will work or better phrased... I couldn't get it to work,
I'm not sure it should work either.
HTH (doubtful),
Tim
""Chris Watson"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If I create a VLAN on a subinterfaceand give that subinterface an IP addy,
> ass
If I create a VLAN on a subinterfaceand give that subinterface an IP addy,
assign the sub to a bridge group, and then assign the bridge group to a BVI,
can I use IP unnumbered on the BVI or do I need an additional IP addy?
Chris Watson, CCNP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.gro
In a message dated 7/17/2002 7:10:58 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Subj:dhcp and subinterfaces [7:49070]
> Date:7/17/2002 7:10:58 PM Central Standard Time
> From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent from the Internet
>
> I think the &
Yep - IP helper address on the sub interface works fine in this situation.
It's secondary addresses which cause problems (in fact don't work as far as
I know).
Gaz
""GEORGE"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If I have s
You can. Just need to put the "ip helper-address" statement on those
sub-ints. As long as the router can reach the DHCP server, so will the DHCP
requests/replies. Hope this helps.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49073&t=49070
--
If I have subinterfaces configured for my vlans' and I wanted a dhcp
server for one vlan can I create the dhcp server and assign it to that
subinterfaces pertaining the vlan in question. I don't have a server on
that vlan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > You ae correct in that you configure your bridge group on the physical
> > and subinterface. You obviously have to configure bridging on some
> > other interface like your LAN, send a copy of your config.
> >
> >
your config.
>
> dave
>
> Mohannad Khuffash wrote:
> >
> > Dear Group,
> > I have a problem for implementing the bridging over the Frame Relay
> > subinterfaces, Cisco say that you should only enable the bridging over
the
> > main interface and the subinter
bridging over the Frame Relay
> subinterfaces, Cisco say that you should only enable the bridging over the
> main interface and the subinterface, i have made that but the problem still
> present! Any one have any idea about that.
> Note: When i issue the show bridge group command it sho
Dear Group,
I have a problem for implementing the bridging over the Frame Relay
subinterfaces, Cisco say that you should only enable the bridging over the
main interface and the subinterface, i have made that but the problem still
present! Any one have any idea about that.
Note: When i issue the
ot;>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I understand that when configure customer or priority queues on
> subinterfaces, the IOS does not use per subinterface queuing, all the
> subinterfaces share the same queuing allocation under the physical
> interface, is this right? I assume FIFI is the sam
I understand that when configure customer or priority queues on
subinterfaces, the IOS does not use per subinterface queuing, all the
subinterfaces share the same queuing allocation under the physical
interface, is this right? I assume FIFI is the same.
But the CCO mentions that you could do
Yes, this applies to ethernet as well. Andy's suggestion-- to tftp the file
elsewhere, edit out any mentions of subinterfaces, then tftp the edited file
back-- worked like a charm.
- Sean
-Original Message-
From: george gittins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08,
Andy, tftp'ing the config and editing out the subif's did the trick. Thanks!
-Sean
-Original Message-
From: Andy Hoang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:01 PM
To: Sean Knox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Deleting Subinterfaces. [7:34802]
After
does the same apply to ethernet?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Andy Hoang
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Deleting Subinterfaces. [7:34802]
After you remove the subif and do a "writ
TECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sean Knox
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Deleting Subinterfaces. [7:34802]
The router has been rebooted multiple, but the subif's persist.
- Sean
-Original Message-
From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The router has been rebooted multiple, but the subif's persist.
- Sean
-Original Message-
From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Deleting Subinterfaces. [7:34802]
In general, I believe that
In general, I believe that when you delete a subinterface (at least on
serial lines) the subinterface won't go away until you reboot the router.
HTH,
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34823&t=34802
--
FAQ, li
I'm having trouble deleting subinterfaces on a 8510CSR. I'm getting the
following "error":
core8500(config)#no int fa1/0/7.203
% Not all config may be removed and may reappear after reactivating the
sub-interface
None of the subifs I attempt to delete actually go away.
Circus,
You need to put 'encaps isl/dot1q (VLAN-#)' on the
subinterface before defining the ip address.
If this isn't a VLAN-trunk link then to assign
multiple IPs, use the secondary keyword at the end of
the ip address command on the major interface.
> Circusnuts wrote:
> >
> > Man- any idea
)#ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "Circusnuts"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 30 January, 2002 20:15
Subject: Ethernet SubInterfaces [7:33790]
> Man- any idea on this one... I'm trying to run two physical addresses
> on
2002 8:15 PM
Subject: Ethernet SubInterfaces [7:33790]
> Man- any idea on this one... I'm trying to run two physical addresses
> on one logical Ethernet interface. I cannot quite understand what this
> error message is pointing me to do (especially since it's a 10BaseT
>
What are you ultimately trying to accomplish? IP addressed ethernet
subinterfaces are used in trunking for inter-VLAN routing. That needs to be
configured on the major interface before being configured on the
subinterfaces.
Circusnuts wrote:
>
> Man- any idea on this one... I'm tr
Man- any idea on this one... I'm trying to run two physical addresses
on one logical Ethernet interface. I cannot quite understand what this
error message is pointing me to do (especially since it's a 10BaseT
link). The CCO has sent me to MPLS examples.
r4(config-subif)#inter e0.1
r4(confi
Man- any idea on this one... I'm trying to run two physical addresses
on one logical Ethernet interface. I cannot quite understand what this
error message is pointing me to do (especially since it's a 10BaseT
link). The CCO has sent me to MPLS examples.
r4(config-subif)#inter e0.1
r4(confi
You failure to ping between spokes is likely due to the split horizon aspect
of your multipoint sub at the hub. As for the rest, you may want to try
giving each site its own subnet for inside global addresses. I think you
effectively have one subnet between all routers and that same subnet behin
Joely,
r1 (hub)
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
duplex auto
speed auto
!
ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.1 10.128.10.9
!
interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
ip address 10.128.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat outside
ip os
What are you pinging at the spoke ? If it's the router then it could be the
same issue, are you running NAT at both ends ??
Depending on traffic load, do a 'debug ip packet' that'll show you.
""Richard Botham"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Joely,
> Thanks
Hi Joely,
Thanks for that.
However:
1 - I don't specify a source interface when pinging from the spoke to the
hub and this works
IP NAT detailed debugging is on
r4#ping 10.128.10.10
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.128.10.10, timeout is 2 seconds:
!
Success
Remember, ping will only work when the source interface is beyond the ip nat
inside interface..the router always chooses the nearest interface to the
dest.
Try using extended ping - you can choose an interface or address then.
""Richard Botham"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EM
All,
I have a hub and spoke setup,
r1 is the hub and r2,r3,r4 are the spokes.
r1 has a multipoint subif and r2,r3,r4 have p2p subif's.
The ospf net running in the wan between r1,r2,r3,r4 is 10.128.10.0/24
WAN
r1 ser0/0.1 multipoint = 10.128.10.1/24
r2 ser0/0.1 p2p = 10.128.10.2/24
r3 ser0/0.1 p
Hi, all!
I was wondering if I could apply the same network address for multipoint
subinterfaces.
Actually, I tried it and it works.. I mean, Cisco router didn't show me any
error by doing it. However, when i try to apply the same network address for
different physical ethernet interface
how would one configure a hub and spoke enviornment with suninterfaces?
im using dce and dte back to back? i can do a normal frame-relay , but what
about other scenarios?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18484&t=18484
---
gittins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: subinterfaces with v.35 [7:16202]
can you make subinterfaces with v.35 back to back , i tried and no success
shows the line down , works with point to point dough, any suggestions
can you make subinterfaces with v.35 back to back , i tried and no success
shows the line down , works with point to point dough, any suggestions?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16202&t=16202
--
F
Hello, I have a quick question.
I have one 1602 router with one ethernet connection. I would like to set it
up using subinterfaces to route my home network over two different ethernet
connections to the internet. (One DSL line and one Cable modem).
Is this possible? I tried setting it up as
yup - exactly the same as for physical interfaces. this works for sub-ints
on FR, ATM, ethernet trunks, whatever you like.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Hans Stout"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: CBAC on subinterfaces [7:3787]
> Hello colleagues,
show atm pvc
should give you some more useful stats
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Ricardo Ciganda"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: txload and rxload counters on subinterfaces [7:3966]
> Hi all!
>
> I don4t find the way to see the traffic acc
Hi all!
I don4t find the way to see the traffic accross a subinterface. The
txload and rxload counters don4t reflect the real traffic. I4m looking
for a solution. Any clue?
Thanks.
ATM1/0.32 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is ENHANCED ATM PA
Internet address is 192.168.99.1/30
MTU 447
Hello colleagues,
I wonder if it is possible to configure context-based access control between
subinterfaces on the same router. Is the concept of external and internal
networks still valid when it comes to subinterfaces ?
Regards,
Hans
Hi All,
I am startled by the following:
By default interfaces are multipoint and NBMA
Multipoint frame relay subinterfaces are NBMA
So why create frame relay subinterfaces if they behave the same way as the
interface?
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
Subject: Subinterfaces in Frame-Relay
Hello all,
Does anyone know how to configure Subinterfaces in Frame-Relay between 2
Cisco 2500 Routers? A short example will do...
Thanks in advance,
Ash
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/2/00 12:04:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> << Does anyone know how to configure Subinterfaces in Frame-Relay between 2
> Cisco 2500 Routers? A short example will do...
&g
Title: RE: Subinterfaces in Frame-Relay
Thanks guys,
I am currently doing the exercises in BCRAN, Cisco Press -
Catherine Paquet. Chapter 11 uses 3600 Router, I have 2509<->2502
Routers. Syntax is slightly
different.
Best Rgds,
Ash
-Original Message-From: Jeff Wang
[
In a message dated 10/2/00 12:04:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Does anyone know how to configure Subinterfaces in Frame-Relay between 2
Cisco 2500 Routers? A short example will do...
>>
If you meant to create one then here you go...quite simple actua
I think configuring frame-relay is not close to a real simulation since
you're missing a switch in between (frame-relay switch). About configuring
subinterfaces on the interfaces, why would you do it if you're only doing a
single PVC?
""Ashfaq Aslam"" <[EMAIL PR
Title: RE: Subinterfaces in Frame-Relay
Ash,
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/15.html
or
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/16.html
They both have what you want.
Cheers
Jeff Wang
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hello all,
Does anyone know how to configure Subinterfaces in Frame-Relay between 2
Cisco 2500 Routers? A short example will do...
Thanks in advance,
Ash
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
Title: RE: subinterfaces
Thanx for the help fellas!
I got it work with IOS 11.3 10T IP PLUS. I didn't want to use 12 because it would require an flash upgrade. All the IOS required a minimum of 6MB until I found the 1600R series only needing 4MB.
Again thanx guys
NovaRich
-Ori
't get it going on a 1600?
> Dale
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nova Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 1:05 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: subinterfaces
>
>
> Thanx guys for the help. The &q
1:05 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: subinterfaces
Thanx guys for the help. The "secondary" command at the end was the problem.
But now I realize that the Cisco 1610 with IOS 11.2 doesn't support NAT.
Does anyone know if you can do NAT on a 1600 and i
you
have 6 meg Flash and 16 meg DRAM.
Tim
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hennen
To: Nova Rich
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 1:41 PM
Subject: RE: subinterfaces
you can do nat with the ip only version of 12.x I assume that means you can
do it with any version
Title: RE: subinterfaces
You
have to have the IP Plus version of your IOS. They have that in a few
flavors of 11.2 or you can go with 12. Just make sure you note the
requirements of flash and ram, as you may need to add some of
both.
Dave
-Original Message-From: Nova Rich
Title: RE: subinterfaces
you can do nat
with the ip only version of 12.x I assume that means you can do it with
any version. very handy and a good reason to upgrade all by itself.
if you don't have a service contract, 12.x ip only for a 1600 router should be
around $20 but make sur
Title: RE: subinterfaces
Thanx guys for the help. The "secondary" command at the end was the problem.
But now I realize that the Cisco 1610 with IOS 11.2 doesn't support NAT. Does anyone know if you can do NAT on a 1600 and if, so which ver. IOS?
NovaRich
Title: subinterfaces
You need to reboot the router to get rid of a sub
interface. Maybe Secondary IP addresses would be a solution for what you want to
do.
Also, the router is stating that to route between
ethernet Sub interfaces you need ISL or dot q because it assumes you will
be
This is correct. And my understanding of the reason you can't use subinterfaces here:
With frame relay, we are used to having subinterfaces. They are on the same physical
interface, so if you think about it, something in every frame is telling the router
which subinterface it belon
--
Reinhold Fischer
CCNP/SCSA/HP Certified Consultant for Network Management
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Nova Rich wrote:
> hey guys,
>
> I was wondering how to apply subinterfaces. I have 1 ether port on my router
> (1600) and need 2 links to the switch. One for public IP and the other for
, September 01, 2000 9:54 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: subinterfaces
hey guys,
I was wondering how to apply subinterfaces. I have 1 ether port on my router
(1600) and need 2 links to the switch. One for public IP and the other for
private IP.
I type in "int e0.1",
Title: subinterfaces
hey guys,
I was wondering how to apply subinterfaces. I have 1 ether port on my router (1600) and need 2 links to the switch. One for public IP and the other for private IP.
I type in "int e0.1", then "ip add x.x.x.x mask" but I get this instea
ECTED]]
Verzonden: woensdag 5 juli 2000 9:40
Aan: Cisco Group Study
Onderwerp: point-to-point or multipoint subinterfaces
Hello,
I have a router with tow serial ports. I have noticed that one of my serial
interfaces, which is configured with HDLC
encap, does not give me the option to choose
between poi
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I have a router with tow serial ports. I have noticed that one of my
serial interfaces, which is configured with HDLC
> encap, does not give me the option to choose
> between point-to-point or mul
Hello,
I have a router with tow serial ports. I have noticed that one of my serial
interfaces, which is configured with HDLC
encap, does not give me the option to choose
between point-to-point or multipoint subinterfaces. The other serial interface, with
frame-relay encap, allows me to do so
: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 12:19 AM
To: Cisco Group Study
Subject: No Point-to-point subinterfaces
Hello to All,
I wanted to configure s0.4 as a point-to-point interface but I could not.
why is that? Does this has any thing to do with
the encapsulation used on s0. I am using HDLC as the encapsulation
Hello to All,
I wanted to configure s0.4 as a point-to-point interface but I could not. why is that?
Does this has any thing to do with
the encapsulation used on s0. I am using HDLC as the encapsulation on s0.
R3(config-subif)#int s0.4 ?
% Unrecognized command
_NetZero Free Internet
Hello,
the ethernet interface (e0) on my router looks like it is connected to tow LANs at the
same time, as it appears from the
output of the command bellow. Why is that and what causes it? How can I remove subnet
166.166.0.0 from the ethernet
interface? I have no LAN sub-interface configured
He's not using 10.2 or before, he's using 11.3
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Douglas James Howe
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 10:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Could not create subi
4 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Could not create subinterfaces
If you are using IOS 10.2 or before...it will not allow subinterfaces.
""Omer Shommo"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I
email,
facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message.
-Original Message-
From: Omer Shommo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 June 2000 00:27
To: Cisco Group Study
Subject: Could not create subinterfaces
Hello,
I tried to create a subinterface on s0 but i could
You also first have to set your encaps to frame-relay on the ser
interface...
-Original Message-
From: Douglas James Howe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Could not create subinterfaces
If you are using IOS 10.2 or
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
