http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4876
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hello,
although a bit late, here's my installation report:
-there was no minimal limit when resizing NTFS (but when using disdrake
there is), so I got unmontable_boot_volume when I started winxp
-even if you dont select any server software you get prompted: You have
selected the following
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Helge Hielscher wrote:
although a bit late, here's my installation report:
-there was no minimal limit when resizing NTFS (but when using disdrake
there is), so I got unmontable_boot_volume when I started winxp
This one is supposed to be fixed in current cooker.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4876
Product: Installation
Component: i18n
Summary: none of the translations works with fresh cooker
installation
Product: Installation
Version: 1.822
Platform: Other
selection of eggdrop make freeze runinstall2
If click is too fast when confirm add dependancies, the window remains and if
click again OK or cancel,drives to previous stage (quick selection)
Keld Jørn Simonsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
I have a question for how the file labels under the installation are
being determined. I had a problem with an error I made when installing
cooker - which I have done recently say 10 times because of other
problems. I may describe this in
Frederic Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) Printer Configuration (Epson Stylus Photo 870, USB)
I tried to print a test page bit got nothing at all
The following command was issued (Ctrl-Alt-F3)
* running: /usr/bin/foomatic-printjob -s cups -P ep870_cooker_
Hi
1) Installing with Grub on a dedicated /boot partition does not work
(cannot boot)
Installing with Lilo (graphical) on the same dedicated /boot works
perfectly fine
2) Supermount is sloo.
plus every ~5s it feels the need to access the floppy drive...
also only
On Sat 16 Aug 2003 05:23, Frederic Soulier posted as excerpted below:
3) Missing KDE programs (eg Konsole)
Konsole was just split off of kdebase. It's now a separate package,
kdebase-konsole, or some such. I think it should still be installed by
default, but either it isn't tweaked to do so
On Saturday 16 August 2003 22.38, Duncan wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2003 05:23, Frederic Soulier posted as excerpted below:
3) Missing KDE programs (eg Konsole)
Konsole was just split off of kdebase. It's now a separate package,
kdebase-konsole, or some such. I think it should still be installed
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 22:21, guran wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2003 22.38, Duncan wrote:
On Sat 16 Aug 2003 05:23, Frederic Soulier posted as excerpted below:
3) Missing KDE programs (eg Konsole)
Konsole was just split off of kdebase. It's now a separate package,
kdebase-konsole, or
Hi
1) There was an error installing packages
gatos-0.0.6-2001016-11mdk
Isn't this one in contrib normally?
2) Printer Configuration (Epson Stylus Photo 870, USB)
I tried to print a test page bit got nothing at all
The following command was issued (Ctrl-Alt-F3)
* running:
Hi
I have a question for how the file labels under the installation are
being determined. I had a problem with an error I made when installing
cooker - which I have done recently say 10 times because of other
problems. I may describe this in another mail.
One of the times I forgot to deselect my
On Fri 15 Aug 2003 09:39, Keld Jørn Simonsen posted as excerpted below:
I have a question for how the file labels under the installation are
being determined.
One of the times I forgot to deselect my /var partition from mdk 9.1,
that is, because there was a /var label on that partition, the
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:09:00AM -0700, Duncan wrote:
On Fri 15 Aug 2003 09:39, Keld Jørn Simonsen posted as excerpted below:
I have a question for how the file labels under the installation are
being determined.
One of the times I forgot to deselect my /var partition from mdk 9.1,
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:19, Pixel wrote:
[frederic] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
getFile Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/lvcreate:
running: lvdisplay ARRAY(0x81cb8cc) -D -c /dev/vg1/
If I then try to click on the created partition and try to delete I get
lvremove failed. Changing to
(not straightforward, bug#4239) using volume
group vg1. I've tried twice to do a complete cooker installation and
twice my gentoo had pbm rebooting because of /etc/modules.conf being
completely screwed...
Considering I name my volumes under LVM as etclv, homelv, varlv etc...
Could it be possible
When installing my non root user during install he didn't land in /etc/shadow,
it used /etc/passwd to store the password, and there was no mention of the
username in /etc/shadow.
root - however, was in shadow fine.
--
Jason Straight
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 1796276
pgp:
As of this morning w/ updated cooker mirror:
Installed from hd, used usb external floppy to boot my sony grx, when
installing bootloader get:
Installation of bootloader failed. The following error occured:
:part_nowrite:read:: input/output error
I noticed every time I did that it tried to
[frederic] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
getFile Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/lvcreate:
running: lvdisplay ARRAY(0x81cb8cc) -D -c /dev/vg1/
If I then try to click on the created partition and try to delete I get
lvremove failed. Changing to Ctrl-Alt-F2 and doing the lvremove manually on
Known, fixed, most over-reported bug for beta2.
sorry
Buchan
thanks
Mandrake 9.2 beta2 is the OS.
I recently tried booting into rescue mode on the laptop
to see if I could salvage the installation of Mandrake9.2 beta 2.
When I try to execute lilo, I get this error in dmesg:
attempt to access beyond end of device
03:01: rw=0, want=4, (=0x4), limit=1
I'm
Frederic Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
Installing Grub on dedicated boot partition /dev/hde1 (I have xosl on a
dedicated FAT16 partition on /dev/hda1 which I use to choose which OS to
boot). I'm then presented with a screen asking me from which drive I'm
booting. I don't understand
Jason Straight [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When installing my non root user during install he didn't land in /etc/shadow,
it used /etc/passwd to store the password, and there was no mention of the
username in /etc/shadow.
oops. my fault.
fixing!
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 12:29, Joe Baker wrote:
Mandrake 9.2 beta2 is the OS.
I recently tried booting into rescue mode on the laptop
to see if I could salvage the installation of Mandrake9.2 beta 2.
When I try to execute lilo, I get this error in dmesg:
attempt to access beyond end of
I 've no printer connected yet but tried to configure printer at end of
installation
tty7
An error occured
printer-utils rpm not found
tty1
...
cannot read printrc file!
tty3
...
selecting packages foomatic-db-engine foomatic-filters foomatic-db
printer-utils printer-testpages nmap scli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
stephlub wrote:
I 've no printer connected yet but tried to configure printer at end of
installation
...
selecting packages foomatic-db-engine foomatic-filters foomatic-db
printer-utils printer-testpages nmap scli
opened rpm database for
This was on a Sony VAIO PCG-Z505SX
Performing a network install (FTP)
USB Floppy.
This was next step after Add a user.
I chose MBR.
For some reason, the floppy disk spun up
when it went to write the MBR to the hard drive
then this message appeared
:p part_nowrite: read:: Input/output
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4239
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-08 23:47 ---
I've tried again today doing more research...
running: lvcreate -size 358400k -n rootlv vg1
remove_bigseldom_used
getFile Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/lvcreate:
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 11:12, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Baker wrote:
This was on a Sony VAIO PCG-Z505SX
Performing a network install (FTP)
USB Floppy.
This was next step after Add a user.
I chose MBR.
For some reason, the floppy disk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Baker wrote:
This was on a Sony VAIO PCG-Z505SX
Performing a network install (FTP)
USB Floppy.
This was next step after Add a user.
I chose MBR.
For some reason, the floppy disk spun up
when it went to write the MBR to the hard drive
then
install: LVM |Cooker installation: LVM
|problem when partitioning |problem when partitioning
|the disk|the disk
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-08 12:44 ---
It also happens using a HD installtion
Hi
After a rsync at uninett I did an installation.
Version:
Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20030731 18:37
I asked for everything to the left plus firewall = 1843 MB
After asking for individual packages and pressing next it wanted to install
1305 MB.
I went back and rechecked the individual packages
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:58:07AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Olivier Blin wrote:
Hi
Would it be possible to show the errata url at the beginning of the
installation ?
It would have been useful for Mandrake 9.1 users with more than 1GB of
memory.
Today,
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Keld [iso-8859-1] Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Another way of doing things was to early on in the install process to
ask whether errata should be installed, that is, before installing all
the packages. That would mean that errors in the distribution could be
remedied. I had an
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:40:31PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Keld [iso-8859-1] Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Another way of doing things was to early on in the install process to
ask whether errata should be installed, that is, before installing all
the packages. That would
On Sunday 20 July 2003 09:15 am, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:40:31PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Aren't these usually addressed by patch floppy images? You image a
floppy, boot the installation disk, type 'patch' at the syslinux prompt,
and put the floppy in later.
B == Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
B Maybe the syslinux boot screen should tell the user to read the
B docs if anything goes wrong? Or is it wrong to expect a user to
B read instructions nowadays?
It's likely sufficient to mention where the docs are located and would
be
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Olivier Blin wrote:
Hi
Would it be possible to show the errata url at the beginning of the
installation ?
It would have been useful for Mandrake 9.1 users with more than 1GB of
memory.
Today, I've helped a new user that didn't know why the installation
hanged.
Hi
Would it be possible to show the errata url at the beginning of the installation ?
It would have been useful for Mandrake 9.1 users with more than 1GB of memory.
Today, I've helped a new user that didn't know why the installation hanged. The errata
url is showed at the end of Mandrake 9.1
Bjørn wrote:
One of the following packages is needed:
1- libguile10-devel-1.4.1-4mdk.i586
2- libguile12-devel-1.6.0-4mdk.i586
What is your choice? (1-2) 2
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (6
MB):
libguile10-1.4.1-4mdk.i586
libguile12-devel-1.6.0-4mdk.i586
One of the following packages is needed:
1- libguile10-devel-1.4.1-4mdk.i586
2- libguile12-devel-1.6.0-4mdk.i586
What is your choice? (1-2) 2
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (6
MB):
libguile10-1.4.1-4mdk.i586
libguile12-devel-1.6.0-4mdk.i586
I upgraded a 9.0 to 9.1, and now the KDE toolbar and menu and
drakconf (especially menudrake and keyboarddrake) are broken.
Toolbar: all buttons munged. Cannot find preferences, command,
icon.
Menu: Some of my apps are on this menu, but a lot are missing,
and a lot of other stuff has
I have the following PC configuration
Processor AMD Athlon 1800
HD Samsung SP 600 3H 60 GB
videoSIS 650_651_M650_740
DVD 52x BDV 316C
CD RW LG 48x12x48 HL-DT-ST GCE 8400B
Net device SIS 900 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter
Modem HSP56 MR
Controller open host sis 7001 da PCI a USBSIS 7002
On Thu 20 Mar 2003 07:10, Enrico Galli posted as excerpted below:
I have the following PC configuration
Processor AMD Athlon 1800
HD Samsung SP 600 3H 60 GB
[]
When I try to install Mandrake 9.0 it stop it when it check HD partition.
Is this problem occur because Samsung HD is not developed
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 08:15, Duncan wrote:
On Thu 20 Mar 2003 07:10, Enrico Galli posted as excerpted below:
I have the following PC configuration
Processor AMD Athlon 1800
HD Samsung SP 600 3H 60 GB
[]
When I try to install Mandrake 9.0 it stop it when it check HD partition.
Is this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 March 2003 19:02, Quel Qun wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 08:15, Duncan wrote:
On Thu 20 Mar 2003 07:10, Enrico Galli posted as excerpted below:
I have the following PC configuration
Processor AMD Athlon 1800
HD Samsung SP 600
On Thu 20 Mar 2003 11:02, Quel Qun posted as excerpted below:
However, I have the same problem with a laptop where 2.4.19 boots fine
and there is no file system corruption (reiserfs partitions).
2.4.21 refuses to boot further than the HD check.
This is a real problem since the install floppy
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 11:07, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 March 2003 19:02, Quel Qun wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 08:15, Duncan wrote:
On Thu 20 Mar 2003 07:10, Enrico Galli posted as excerpted below:
I have the following PC
Quel Qun wrote:
As I wrote in the bug report, I tried booting with ide0=nodma (I also
tried ide0=notune), but it did not change anything.
I don't have access to any dma setting in the BIOS.
Don't know if it's supposed to be this way, but when I was having
trouble with installing from an old
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 16:08, Bruno Prior wrote:
Quel Qun wrote:
As I wrote in the bug report, I tried booting with ide0=nodma (I also
tried ide0=notune), but it did not change anything.
I don't have access to any dma setting in the BIOS.
Don't know if it's supposed to be this way, but
Whenever I try to install cooker from cd I get the error that there was
a problem installing filesystem-2.1.3-8mdk
Any clue as to what the problem is? Do I need to do something else? I
have tried from 2 different sets of cds.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Dennis D Courtney wrote:
Whenever I try to install cooker from cd I get the error that there was
a problem installing filesystem-2.1.3-8mdk
Any clue as to what the problem is? Do I need to do something else? I
have tried from 2 different sets of cds.
rpm -K
I tried it and this is what I got:
filesystem-2.1.3-8mdk.noarch.rpm: md5 gpg OK
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 15:23, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Dennis D Courtney wrote:
Whenever I try to install cooker from cd I get the error that there was
a problem installing
I tried it and this is what I got:
filesystem-2.1.3-8mdk.noarch.rpm: md5 gpg OK
Could it have something to do with my upgrading 9.1rc2 rather than a
full install?
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 15:23, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Dennis D Courtney wrote:
Whenever I try to install cooker
I tried a fresh install of cooker, everything installed perceftly,
except filesystem It told me that there was a problem with the file.
So I tried another copy I had made a few days before and received the
same error. Please help! I reinstalled rc1 to get this far.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Helge Hielscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-rpmdrake:
*proxy configuration is not easy and is not explained in the help
file (how to use a ftp and an http proxy?)
Well I don't know myself very much on how to use both
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*the UI is sometimes very slow
*difficult to add a cooker source (there need to be some help
with synthesis/hdlist)
The list of cooker sources has been deliberately removed because
people used to use cooker for updating their packages,
Hallo Helge,
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Helge Hielscher wrote:
layer does in detail. There was no explanation of the security admin field.
- often (e.g. choose how many CDs, Internet config) it sais Wählen Sie
O.K.(choose OK), but the button label is Weiter
...
Die Deutsche übersetzungen sind noch
Am Montag, 3. März 2003, 13:07:20 Uhr MET, schrieb Reinout van Schouwen:
Die Deutsche übersetzungen sind noch nicht fertig. Auch die übersetzungen
sind abhängig von freiwilliger Arbeit. Also geh mal nach
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/l10n/de.php3 und lese
Helge Hielscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-rpmdrake:
*proxy configuration is not easy and is not explained in the help
file (how to use a ftp and an http proxy?)
Well I don't know myself very much on how to use both types of
proxies :).
I guess this feature is, first, for experts and second,
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 09:10, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Helge Hielscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-rpmdrake:
*proxy configuration is not easy and is not explained in the help
file (how to use a ftp and an http proxy?)
Well I don't know myself very much on how to use both types of
This time James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
becomes daring and writes:
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 09:10, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Helge Hielscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-rpmdrake:
*proxy configuration is not easy and is not explained in the help
file (how to use a ftp and an http
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 22:00, Vox wrote:
This time James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
becomes daring and writes:
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 09:10, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Helge Hielscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-rpmdrake:
*proxy configuration is not easy and is not explained in
Hello,
this weekend I've found some time to give 9.1RC1 a try. Here is a list
of points that can be improved:
Installing RC1:
- when you choose the Sicherheitsebene(security layer), the help field
could use a hint about where to find aditional information what each
layer does in detail. There
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more
I have tried to install Mandrake Linux 9.1 beta 3 in three differents types of computers with differents Via chipsets, but I am getting more than 20 errors
after the installation of the first disk, and specially when the second cd start
to install the office programs, I have 'yes' to continue with
R. Dale Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are no errors indicated in console 4 (or 3).
Console 2 shows (with ps) that the install2 process is still
running. But it never gets to the point of scanning serial
ports, tho'. I looked at the install2 perl script, but I'm
not a perl
There are no errors indicated in console 4 (or 3).
Console 2 shows (with ps) that the install2 process is still
running. But it never gets to the point of scanning serial
ports, tho'. I looked at the install2 perl script, but I'm
not a perl programmer couldn't make much of it. I thought
of
Hmmm... In digging deeper to my installation problems, (see bug 1802
that I posted earlier tonight) - I now see that after I select ataraid
as a module to load for my SCSI interface (which is really a PDC20276
MBFastTrak133), I see in ctrl-alt-f3 that it is complaining:
Missing module ataraid
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday February 16 2003 01:00 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
I have the same experience, ie, loading second stage hangs,
both b2 and b3, but only if I press F1 and type 'expert'. If I
just hit Enter and let it do a regular install it all
On Monday February 17 2003 07:18 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This probly won't help, sorry ;( I booted with the b3 1st CD
and, F1, typed in 'expert'. it hung again. Altho the cursor is
blinkin on the screen, the system will not respond to
Also I need to use PEERYP, so the network config needs to ask about that as
well.
Thanks.
--
John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MandrakeClub Silver Member.
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday February 17 2003 07:18 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This probly won't help, sorry ;( I booted with the b3 1st CD
and, F1, typed in 'expert'. it hung again. Altho the cursor is
blinkin on
On Monday February 17 2003 12:39 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Oh, do you have an USB keyboard? Then it's normal - well, not
normal, it's a kernel bug (destroying the bios PS2 keyboard
compatibility), but it's a known feature :).
No it's a standard USA ps2 keyboard
Sorry, I can't
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
I have a box that I have previously installed 9.0 from DVD.
I have made major changes in disk drives DVD reader. However, now
attempting an install, with the 9.0 DVD or the CD's from 9.1b3 (which
I have used to install on another box, so they
Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
I have a box that I have previously installed 9.0 from DVD.
I have made major changes in disk drives DVD reader. However, now
attempting an install, with the 9.0 DVD or the CD's from 9.1b3 (which
I have used to install on
On Sunday 16 February 2003 4:42 am, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
*snip*
Same 2Gig as the 9.0 installation was. Only 896M recognized,
although.
Forest.Gump=impersonation
I might not be a smart man, but even I know that when ya dont have all yuh
memory showin up, it might mean yuh done got some
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Sunday 16 February 2003 4:42 am, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
*snip*
Same 2Gig as the 9.0 installation was. Only 896M recognized,
although.
Forest.Gump=impersonation
I might not be a smart man, but even I know that when ya dont have all yuh
memory
On Sunday 16 February 2003 04:07 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
I have a box that I have previously installed 9.0 from DVD.
I have made major changes in disk drives DVD reader. However, now
attempting an install, with the 9.0 DVD or the CD's from
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 10:42, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
I have a box that I have previously installed 9.0 from DVD.
I have made major changes in disk drives DVD reader. However, now
attempting an install, with the 9.0 DVD
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 14:06, et wrote:
On Sunday 16 February 2003 04:07 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
I have a box that I have previously installed 9.0 from DVD.
I have made major changes in disk drives DVD reader. However, now
attempting an
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 09:56:45 -0500
et [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heck _I_ am one of the biggest reasons the newbie list is such a
gab-fest,
I'll agree with that (-;
Charles
--
Love is being stupid together.
-- Paul Valery
-
Mandrake Linux 9.1
On Sunday February 16 2003 08:43 am, Adam Williamson wrote:
The fact that it seems to happen to so many people suggests to me
that at least some of them are experiencing Mandrake bugs, which
makes discussing it legitimate on this list.
I've only tried installing from the last two betas (2
It would have been handy to have also pointed to the places
where it was discussed as not all of us know everything even tho'
we might be experienced!
et wrote:
On Sunday 16 February 2003 04:07 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, R. Dale Thomas wrote:
I have a box that I have
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday February 16 2003 08:43 am, Adam Williamson wrote:
The fact that it seems to happen to so many people suggests to me
that at least some of them are experiencing Mandrake bugs, which
makes discussing it legitimate on this list.
I've only
R. Dale Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a box that I have previously installed 9.0 from DVD.
I have made major changes in disk drives DVD reader. However, now
attempting an install, with the 9.0 DVD or the CD's from 9.1b3 (which
I have used to install on another box, so they
More info. It hangs in 'expert' mode, but not by default.
Where do I find out about this?
R. Dale Thomas wrote:
I have a box that I have previously installed 9.0 from DVD.
I have made major changes in disk drives DVD reader. However, now
attempting an install, with the 9.0 DVD or the
On Sunday February 16 2003 01:00 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
I have the same experience, ie, loading second stage hangs,
both b2 and b3, but only if I press F1 and type 'expert'. If I
just hit Enter and let it do a regular install it all proceeds
with no hesitation or problems. I
I have a box that I have previously installed 9.0 from DVD.
I have made major changes in disk drives DVD reader. However, now
attempting an install, with the 9.0 DVD or the CD's from 9.1b3 (which
I have used to install on another box, so they are OK), everything
seems to go alright untill the
I know this was brought up before as to if we really need this
screen...and I am not sure that we do...but if we are going to keep it I
have a suggestion:
instead of listing them like cups, proftp, ..., etc I think it would
be more useful to actually list them and give a brief description of
what
On Sunday 02 February 2003 03:41 pm, Pixel scribbled in crayon on a yellow
legal pad:
Brad Chamberlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
instead of listing them like cups, proftp, ..., etc I think it would
be more useful to actually list them and give a brief description of
what they are used for
Brad Chamberlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
instead of listing them like cups, proftp, ..., etc I think it would
be more useful to actually list them and give a brief description of
what they are used for and what packages they selected to get them
installed...something like:
what you propose
If any of this should be filed in Bugzilla, let me
know. Also I ran 'bug' and have that floppy, if
that's useful at all.
1) Font face in the active part of the installation
program is pretty inconsistent. It's spotty and very
faded in spots.
2) License Agreement, Refuse is selected by default
Elliott Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I decided to do a clean install of 9.1b1 and have discovered that a swap
partition is now a requirement even if you do an expert install. Could the
installer be made to ignore the presence of a swap partition during an
expert installation as it was
Hello,
I decided to do a clean install of 9.1b1 and have discovered that a swap
partition is now a requirement even if you do an expert install. Could the
installer be made to ignore the presence of a swap partition during an
expert installation as it was before? I'd hate to have the installer
Elliott Martin wrote:
Hello,
I decided to do a clean install of 9.1b1 and have discovered that a swap
partition is now a requirement even if you do an expert install. Could the
installer be made to ignore the presence of a swap partition during an
expert installation as it was before? I'd hate
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 22:00, J. Greenlees wrote:
Elliott Martin wrote:
Hello,
I decided to do a clean install of 9.1b1 and have discovered that a swap
partition is now a requirement even if you do an expert install. Could the
installer be made to ignore the presence of a swap
Gabriel Zachmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At the setup file systems stage, I get the error message
I can't read your partition table, it's too corrupted ...!
can you give the output of fdisk -l /dev/hda ?
and also cat /proc/partitions ?
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
