On Sun, 21 Jul 2024, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
This is in a way a continuation of my recently "purely local DNS" thread.
To recap: my objective is to send emails to a single domain with both DNS and
any other email traffic being disabled.
A simple working solution that I've found for Postfix is:
Thanks for pointing that out.
I've noticed that installing sendmail package was removing postfix and
vice versa.
That made me think these two were mutually exclusive.
After reinstalling postfix, logwatch suddenly started sending emails so
everything is now working as expected.
---
Adam
O
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 18:36:30 +1000
George at Clug wrote:
> Adam,
>
> I dislike people to reply to my questions but do not answer the
> question, instead suggest I do something totally different.
Yes, but sometimes:
a) that's the right answer anyway
b) it may not answer the OP's question. but
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:24:06 +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
> with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
>
> to make logwatch use postfix (a
Adam Weremczuk writes:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
> with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
>
> to make logwatch use postfix (already working without DNS) instead of
>
Adam,
I dislike people to reply to my questions but do not answer the question,
instead suggest I do something totally different.
Please forgive me, as that is what I am about to do.
I have had, what seems to me to be similar issue, my solution was to set up an
authoritative BIND9 server on th
Adam Weremczuk writes:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
Eee. Nothing?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
dpkg -L postfix|grep send
/usr/sbin/sendmail
/usr
Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
What exactly shall I substitute:
mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
to make logwatch use postfix (already working without DNS) instead of
sendmail?
On 21/07/2024 08:08, Jeff
Sendmail is too old to be supported.
You may use postfix and exim instead. They are main stream MTA software
today.
On 2024-07-21 14:58, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
This is in a way a continuation of my recently "purely local DNS"
thread.
To recap: my objective is to send emails to a single domai
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
Yeah I'm seeing this too! Identical in fact. This is what I did to
fix this: I added this to my /etc/mail/access file for my local
server that sends this messages to me
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 09:34:39 +0100, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> cron isn’t a mail sending tool — not the right place to police something
> like this. Seems to me that sendmail is.
There are two possible layers here. First, a cron job (typically a
shell command, or a shell script) might invoke mail
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
Yeah I'm seeing this too! Identical in fact. This is what I did to
fix this: I added this to my /etc/mail/access file for my local
server that sends this messages to me:
SRV_Features:127.0.0.1 L U G
Spec
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024, Mark Fletcher wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 23:21, Tim Woodall wrote:
The thing I'm seeing is in the body of the email - I had no idea
this was illegal - and I'm surprised that tools like cron don't do
something to avoid sending "illegal" emails. Indeed, even mail will
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 23:21, Tim Woodall wrote:
>
>
> The thing I'm seeing is in the body of the email - I had no idea
> this was illegal - and I'm surprised that tools like cron don't do
> something to avoid sending "illegal" emails. Indeed, even mail will do
> so happily.
>
> cron isn’t a mai
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 6:13 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 23:08:01 +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> > According to this
> > https://support.trustwave.com/kb/KnowledgebaseArticle10016.aspx
> >
> > bare CRs aren't allowed in emails but this has always worked.
> >
> > I'm only likel
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 6:08 PM Tim Woodall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
> >
> >> After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
> >> seeing this in the logs:
> >>
> >
> > Hmmm, this update seems to have done a
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
Yeah I'm seeing this too! Identical in fact. This is what I did to
fix this: I added this to my /etc/mail/access file for my local
server that sends this messages to me:
SRV_Features:127.0.0.1 L U G
Specifically, I added the U and G features, (I
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 23:08:01 +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
According to this
https://support.trustwave.com/kb/KnowledgebaseArticle10016.aspx
bare CRs aren't allowed in emails but this has always worked.
I'm only likely to have cron generating emails l
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 23:08:01 +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> According to this
> https://support.trustwave.com/kb/KnowledgebaseArticle10016.aspx
>
> bare CRs aren't allowed in emails but this has always worked.
>
> I'm only likely to have cron generating emails like this.
>
> Strange that this w
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
seeing this in the logs:
Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot of odd things.
root@dirac:~# mail root
Cc:
Subject: test cr
this
is^Ma
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 10:20:24PM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> > After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
> > seeing this in the logs:
> >
>
> Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot of odd things.
>
> MSP Queue status...
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
seeing this in the logs:
Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot of odd things.
MSP Queue status...
/var/spool/mqueue-client (2 requests)
-Q-ID- --Size--
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
Jun 30 11:43:00 bottom sm-mta[18852]: AUTH: available mech=DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
LOGIN PLAIN, allowed mech=EXTERNAL
Update here, it's not apparently an STARTTLS error, it's an AUTH
error. Something in the update last night altered my list of
available
> Jun 30 11:43:00 bottom sm-mta[18852]: AUTH: available mech=DIGEST-MD5
> CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN, allowed mech=EXTERNAL
Update here, it's not apparently an STARTTLS error, it's an AUTH
error. Something in the update last night altered my list of
available AUTH mechanisms.
I manually updated sendm
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 6:41 AM Henning Follmann
wrote:
>
> >
> > So I guess my question is, do I need one now on the Bullseye server, if
> > saslauthd always worked for this before?
> >
>
> OK, that's an option too.
>
> Now I would check if sasl works. There is an little helper program; try:
> t
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 12:42:00PM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:37 AM Henning Follmann
> wrote:
>
> >
> > First, please do not top post.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> > > Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterpr
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:37 AM Henning Follmann
wrote:
>
> First, please do not top post.
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> > Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP
> server
> > for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at leas
First, please do not top post.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP server
> for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
> have deployed and configured Sendmail on probably
Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP server
for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
have deployed and configured Sendmail on probably hundreds of servers over
the years, but most of them are on internal networks and relay mail
through
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:55:06AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Years ago, I set up an SMTP server on Debian 7.5, running Sendmail
> configured for SASL authentication using an LDAP directory. I am now
> trying to set up a new one on Debian 11.5 in pretty much the same
> configuration,
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 23:44 +, jon wrote:
>
> root@mail:/usr/share/doc# ldd /usr/sbin/sendmail |grep 'libwrap'
> libwrap.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0xb7525000)
> root@mail:/usr/share/doc# cat /etc/debian_version
> 8.2
>
> I want to use sendmail with tcp wrappers but it
I finally managed to get sendmail working using systemd.
Here is my /etc/systemd/system/sendmail.service:
[Unit]
Description=Sendmail Mail Transport Agent
Requires=clamav-daemon.service spamassassin.service
After=syslog.target network.target clamav-daemon.service
spamassassin.service
Conflicts=po
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:07:37PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Reco wrote:
> > I don't know if this has anything to do with that:
> >
> > # systemctl enable sendmail
> > Synchronizing state for sendmail.service with sysvinit using
> update-r
Hi,
Michael Grant writes:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Could you try restarting sendmail (systemctl restart sendmail) and show
>> the output of `systemctl status sendmail'? It also shows the most recent
>> log entries, but the output of journalctl --unit sendmail
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Michael Grant wrote:
> > I'm still searching for an answer to this.
> > After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
> > I see that the system is using systemd.
> > ...
>
> Some comments that I think are relevant...
>
> Since
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> ...
> Could you try restarting sendmail (systemctl restart sendmail) and show
> the output of `systemctl status sendmail'? It also shows the most recent
> log entries, but the output of journalctl --unit sendmail --since -5min
> might also
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Reco wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:31:26PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco wrote:
> ...
> >
> > Try adding
> >
> > export _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT="true"
> >
> > to /etc/init.d/sendmail
> >
> > Thanks, this i
Michael Grant wrote:
> I'm still searching for an answer to this.
> After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
> I see that the system is using systemd.
> ...
Some comments that I think are relevant...
Since it took a while for someone to respond to your question it tells
me
Hi,
Michael Grant writes:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco wrote:
>> A nessesary correction - /etc/init.d/sendmail *tries* to run
>> '/bin/systemctl start sendmail.service'.
>>
>> But, since no sendmail* package provide systemd's service file -
>> nothing happens.
Not true. Systemd is sup
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:25PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
> > I'm still searching for an answer to this.
> >
> > After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
> >
> > I see that the system is using systemd. I see that
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:25PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
> I'm still searching for an answer to this.
>
> After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
>
> I see that the system is using systemd. I see that the /etc/init.d/sendmail
> script now runs /bin/systemctl
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd. I see that the
/etc/init.d/sendmail script now runs /bin/systemctl start
sendmail.service. But sendmail isn't started. Even running
'/bin/systemct
Just for the sake of completeness, this wasn't actually an issue with the
GreetPause option or anything else in the access file. The problem was
that sendmail was attempting an IDENT query to the client, with a 5-second
timeout. The access file wasn't even checked until after the timeout
expired.
Thanks, but it looks like the IDENT setting was the culprit. I just had to
change this setting in sendmail.cf:
O Timeout.ident=5s
Changing it from 5s to 0s resolved the problem immediately. Thanks again,
everyone!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> On 2015-01-13 at
On 2015-01-13 at 12:38, David Parker wrote:
Hello,
My /etc/mail/access file is pasted below. The PC I'm testing from is on the
10.x.x.x network, which should be allowed to
connect with no delay. I have also tried setting the default GreetPause to "0"
but it still made no difference.
##
Yes! That seems to be the culprit. I ran an strace on the sendmail
process and that's exactly what happens:
[ ... ]
4007 15:09:08.386921 connect(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(113),
sin_addr=inet_addr("10.3.1.40")}, 16
3792 15:09:13.386272 <... select resumed> ) = 0 (Timeout)
[ ... ]
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:12:11 +
Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:27:42 -0500
> David Parker wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the replies.
> >
> > The system is not using tcpwrappers, and it's also not a DNS issue.
> > The client PC does have a reverse DNS entry. A tcpdump packet
> > capture on t
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:27:42 -0500
David Parker wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> The system is not using tcpwrappers, and it's also not a DNS issue.
> The client PC does have a reverse DNS entry. A tcpdump packet
> capture on the server shows the initial connection from the client
> followe
Thanks for the replies.
The system is not using tcpwrappers, and it's also not a DNS issue. The
client PC does have a reverse DNS entry. A tcpdump packet capture on the
server shows the initial connection from the client followed by a bunch of
DNS traffic, all within the same second. Then nothi
David Parker wrote:
> We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit.
> Kaccess hash -T /etc/mail/access
> # FEATURE(`access_db', `hash -T /etc/mail/access', `skip')dnl
> For some reason, I just can't get it to not pause when greeting external
> (non-localhost) connections.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:38 PM, David Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit.
> We're using the file /etc/mail/access for access control and rate limiting,
> and this is enabled via the following lines in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf:
>
> Kaccess
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:34:45AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Is there a way to specify smart host and credentials with Sendmail
> command? If yes, could you point me to example.
May I recommend msmtp? It's perfect for relaying e-mail to always-connected,
real SMTPs. I'm using it on my, most
On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 19:10:05 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> OK, here we go.
>
> mailx -v -s "TEST "141014_184452" 2xd1 rea...@jtan.com < /tmp/tstmsg.txt
Two mails are being sent.
> 550 5.1.1 <2...@2xd1.local.lan>... User unknown
This one didn't make it.
> Why does it go to a dead letter
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:19:03 +, T o n g wrote:
> It seems to me that sendmail is not accepting local smtp connections:
because of the sendmail service is not started (this is a new install).
update-rc.d sendmail defaults
invoke-rc.d sendmail start
problem solved.
--
Tong (remove unders
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Kelly Jones wrote:
I have sendmail installed on etch, but not running as a daemon
Why on earth would you do that ... sendmail, like any other MTA these
days binds only to 127.0.0.1 by default.
When I do:
# echo "Test" | /usr/lib/sendmail f...@bar.com
the logs show this
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:55:44PM -0700, Kelly Jones wrote:
> On 6/21/09, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Kelly Jones wrote:
> >> I have sendmail installed on etch,
> >
> > Is there a reason not to upgrade to Lenny, the current stable? This
> > is outside of your current problem but you really should thin
Kelly Jones wrote:
> On 6/21/09, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>> Kelly Jones wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason not to upgrade to Lenny, the current stable? This
>> is outside of your current problem but you really should think about
>> keeping current.
>>
>
> I plan to use a cluster of cheap VPS
On 6/21/09, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Kelly Jones wrote:
>> I have sendmail installed on etch,
>
> Is there a reason not to upgrade to Lenny, the current stable? This
> is outside of your current problem but you really should think about
> keeping current.
I plan to use a cluster of cheap VPS' for red
Kelly Jones wrote:
> I have sendmail installed on etch,
Is there a reason not to upgrade to Lenny, the current stable? This
is outside of your current problem but you really should think about
keeping current.
Using Sendmail is probably okay but IMNHO there are better choices.
Would you entertai
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, kj wrote:
I should know this but I'm drawing a blank, and google is only finding the
things I'm not looking for.
Man, I know the feeling
How do I get sendmail to forget the MX lookups it's done for mail that are
already in the queue, and check them again? I have a clien
Richard A Nelson írta:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Andics László wrote:
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MSA,Port=submission,Modifiers=aE')
Check submit.mc for the msp feature line - you'll want to make sure
the port is 25 instead of 587 ... something like:
FEATURE(`msp', `[127.0.0.1]', `25')dnl
That was the
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Andics László wrote:
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MSA,Port=submission,Modifiers=aE')
Check submit.mc for the msp feature line - you'll want to make sure
the port is 25 instead of 587 ... something like:
FEATURE(`msp', `[127.0.0.1]', `25')dnl
--
Rick Nelson
Ever heard of .c
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: cow...@debian.org
>To: laci...@gmail.com
>Subject: Re: Sendmail wants to auth local mails
>Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:27:50 -0800 (PST)
>
>>On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Andics László wrote:
>>
>>> I have these two Con
Richard A Nelson írta:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Andics László wrote:
Any Srv_Features lines ?
No, my access file is have only those two Connect lines.
Ok, what does your DAEMON_OPTOINS line look like, M=a will
cause this
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA,Port=smtp')
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MSA,Port=submi
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Andics László wrote:
Any Srv_Features lines ?
No, my access file is have only those two Connect lines.
Ok, what does your DAEMON_OPTOINS line look like, M=a will
cause this
--
Rick Nelson
The purpose of having mailing lists rather than having newsgroups is to
place a ba
Richard A Nelson írta:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Andics László wrote:
I have these two Connect lines:
"
Connect:localhostRELAY
Connect:gophernet.huRELAY
"
looks ok
I have really no idea what is wrong with this.
Anyway, thanks for the answer.
Any Srv_Features lines ?
No, my access fil
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Andics László wrote:
I have these two Connect lines:
"
Connect:localhostRELAY
Connect:gophernet.huRELAY
"
looks ok
I have really no idea what is wrong with this.
Anyway, thanks for the answer.
Any Srv_Features lines ?
--
Rick Nelson
Where in the US is Linus?
Richard A Nelson wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Andics László wrote:
The original message was received at Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:25:17 +0100
from r...@localhost
Is localhost in /etc/mail/local-host-names ?
and sendmail.mc has
FEATURE(`use_cw_file')dnl # local-host-names
Yes, it"s
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Andics László wrote:
The original message was received at Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:25:17 +0100
from r...@localhost
Is localhost in /etc/mail/local-host-names ?
and sendmail.mc has
FEATURE(`use_cw_file')dnl # local-host-names
- The following addresses
Mike,
Your right! The reverse DNS file for that IP ranged got toasted by a
FAT finger. Found the error and reload the named server. Thanks for
spotting that!
Thanks again,
Ken
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
On Thu August 7 2008 13:14:40 Account for Debian group mail wrote:
We're
On Thu August 7 2008 13:14:40 Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> We're having a problem sending mail to comcast.net. The message we are
> getting is:
>
> Aug 7 12:31:18 smtp sm-mta[22694]: m77JV1iC022684:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:00:17, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, p
> ri=210588, r
On Wed, 14 May 2008, NFN Smith wrote:
If I set DAEMON_HOSTSTATS="No"; in sendmail.conf, then sendmailconfig
deletes /var/lib/sendmail/host_status, as described in relevant
documentation. However, somewhere along, sendmail is still trying to
write to that directory on the regular runs of the s
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 08:11:13AM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:16:13PM +0200, Viktor Matys wrote:
> Best-practice for a mail server is to run a caching name server to
> minimize DNS timeouts. If you're not already doing so, you might want to
> consider that. You migh
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:16:13PM +0200, Viktor Matys wrote:
> WARNING: local host name (;; connection timed out; no servers could be
> reached) is not qualified; see cf/README: WHO AM I?
I run postfix, not sendmail, but wanted to suggest that you check your
/etc/hosts file to ensure that there
Viktor Matys wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have sendmail installed on several servers of different customers.
> When I run sendmailconfig on some server I get message:
>
> WARNING: local host name (;; connection timed out; no servers could be
> reached) is not qualified; see cf/README: WHO AM I?
>
> As
s. keeling wrote:
Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
T o n g wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:17:51 -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
In
Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> T o n g wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:17:51 -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
> >>
> >>> how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
> >>
> >> Install sendmail-doc and c
T o n g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:17:51 -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
> >
> >> how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP
> >> server?
> >
> > Install sendmail-doc and check /usr/share/doc/sendm
T o n g wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:17:51 -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
Install sendmail-doc and check /usr/share/doc/sendmail/cf.README.gz
for SMART_
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:17:51 -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
>
>> how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
>
> Install sendmail-doc and check /usr/share/doc/sendmail/cf.README.gz
> for SMART_HOST ( define(`SMART
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > It's probably best to avoid sendmail if you're new to setting up email
> > and go with the debian default of exim instead.
>
> I'll assume you were trying to be helpful (and simply failed), and not
> trying to start another MTA pissing contest.
Yeah,
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
Install sendmail-doc and check /usr/share/doc/sendmail/cf.README.gz
for SMART_HOST ( define(`SMART_HOST', `')dnl )
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
It's prob
On Thursday 20 March 2008 02:12:14 am Andrius wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 20:50 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
> > > how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
> >
> > It's probably best to avoid sendmail if you're
On Mar 19, 11:40 am, Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Andrius
>
Andrius,
I'm not familiar with the sendmail installation on Debian, but if it
comes with a .mc file, you should look to edi
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 20:50 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
>
> > how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
>
> It's probably best to avoid sendmail if you're new to setting up email and go
> with the debian default
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:21:17 am Andrius wrote:
> how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
It's probably best to avoid sendmail if you're new to setting up email and go
with the debian default of exim instead.
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBS
Andrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> how to configure Sendmail to send a messages through ISP SMTP server?
> Thank you.
Try 'dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config'
You can repeat this until you get it right. Also, you can break off
the reconfiguration by typing Control-C. Then you can start o
> I just set up a Debian system using testing as the source. I moved from a
> Gentoo Linux system. I installed Sendmail. I am able to send and receive
> e-mail outside of this box with no problems. But, cron is not able to
> send any e-mails from within the box. Here is the error message:
>
>
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi community
Hello
I have to authenticate Sendmail using openldap (I can't choose another SMTP is
for my job, also I've already got cyrus-imap using sasl and openldap).
I use sendmail/openldap/dovecot
Should I SASL in order to integrate both send
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:04:42PM -0300, Valdir Marcos wrote:
> init---atd
> +-bash
> +-cron---firebird
> ¦ +-sendmail
> +-cron---cron---sendmail
> ¦ +-sh---curl
> +-dhclient
> +-exim4
>
>
> How can I discover what sendmail and exim4 are doing
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Jeff D wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has
hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid th
Jeff D wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has
hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4
instead of
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded
sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of sendmail
will
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:12:18AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >
> How many times do I have to tell you this is not my decision to make?
> If it was up to my I'd use Exim4. I've used it successfully in the past
> with applications that specifically called for sendmail, but the person
>
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded
sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of
sendmail will break them. I tried to get him to use
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >
> Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded
> sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of
> sendmail will break them. I tried to get him to use exim4 but he wasn't
> about
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:48:19AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I see this has been asked before, but being the total sendmail newbie
that I am, and that Debian uses sendmailconfig to configure sendmail I
am not quite sure as to how to proceed.
Out of cur
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:48:19AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> I see this has been asked before, but being the total sendmail newbie
> that I am, and that Debian uses sendmailconfig to configure sendmail I
> am not quite sure as to how to proceed.
>
Out of curiousity, if you are a total se
][ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wasn't able to use sendmail recently. I've now track it down that the
> hostname that my Sendmail uses is wrong. How can I fix it?
>
> % /usr/sbin/sendmail -bi
> WARNING: local host name (;; connection timed out; no servers could be
> reached) is not qualified; see cf
"T.J. Duchene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the appropriate list for this? Bugs?
>
>
>
> I'm not sure if you would really consider this a flaw or not. I do, but
> then I've had more experience with Sendmail than most.
>
> The Debian package installers in Sarge and Etch contain a ser
1 - 100 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
