We should do a health-check of proposed features [1] which are at risk for
4.2 feature freeze before deciding to re-evaluate timelines.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Design+Documents
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On May 29, 2013, at 7:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:02 AM, murali reddy wrote:
> We should do a health-check of proposed features [1] which are at risk for
> 4.2 feature freeze before deciding to re-evaluate timelines.
>
We are supposedly doing time-based release, so we don't care about
what features make it versus don't.
Yes. We agreed on time based release. I am failing to see what would extending
freeze date will achieve.
On 30-May-2013, at 12:34 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:02 AM, murali reddy wrote:
>> We should do a health-check of proposed features [1] which are at risk for
>> 4.2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11380/
---
(Updated May 30, 2013, 7:23 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh
Thank you for comment,
SSP is an SDN controller that creates L2 virtual network
backed by vxlan. In cloudstack, the service will shows as
"connectivity" networking service provider.
I'm sorry that the description is so short, I've asked my
colleage to fill up the docs.
(2013/05/30 15:12), Chira
+1
two weeks delay for feature freeze,
no extension for 4.3 release
-Wei
2013/5/30 John Burwell
> All,
>
> Since we have taken an eight (8) week delay completing the 4.1.0 release,
> I would like propose that we re-evaluate the timelines for the 4.2.0
> release. When the schedule was origina
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11511/#review21184
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- mice xia
On May 29, 2013, 12:56 p.m., Saksha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11511/#review21182
---
Commit 62413eec1067ab5d92977fab93a2fc88d4247bb0 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11156/#review21183
---
Commit 62413eec1067ab5d92977fab93a2fc88d4247bb0 in branch refs/heads
(2013/05/30 15:56), Sheng Yang wrote:
-snip-
BTW, I cannot figure out a way to automatically configure OVS on
Ubuntu
when booting up. it seems /etc/network/interfaces file doesn't know
about OVS.
The syntax is described in
/usr/share/doc/openvswitch-__swi
I've put my installation procedure here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/KVM+with+OpenVSwitch
Please edit and adapt where needed :D
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:37 AM
> To: Sheng Yang
+1
The more SDN providers we support the better.
I say go for it!
:-)
Cheers,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:23 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][ACS4.2] Stratosphere SDN pla
Compromise without change?
Bring 4.3 forward by two months, leave 4.2 as it is.
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 30 May 2013 8:27 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> +1
> two week
+1. looking forward.
@Hugo: you are my mentor at GSOC2013, project "Add Xen/XCP support for GRE
SDN controller", jira ticket 1779. How can I contact you on skype or irc :-)
Thanks.
2013/5/30 Hugo Trippaers
> +1
>
> The more SDN providers we support the better.
>
> I say go for it!
>
> :-)
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11540/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Stratosphre SSP is an SDN c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11380/#review21185
---
Commit 965c7b9c35fc5680b2f35a8c8fed35c1232a643b in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10797/#review21187
---
Commit 965c7b9c35fc5680b2f35a8c8fed35c1232a643b in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/#review21186
---
Commit 965c7b9c35fc5680b2f35a8c8fed35c1232a643b in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10797/#review21188
---
Commit 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/#review21189
---
Commit 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11380/#review21190
---
Commit 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921 in branch refs/heads
Hi,
I am Dharmesh and I will be working on integrating mesos with cloudstack. I
am MS by Research student at IIIT-H (International Institute of Information
Technology, Hyderabad, India). I love large scale distributed systems and
data processing frameworks, specifically interested in resource mana
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10970/#review21191
---
Daan,
I noticed quite a few tabs in your patch. The CloudStack stan
There is support for Intel AES NI instruction set for openSSL in the
current debian wheezy system vm template.
Can someone point out to resources that may help benchmark this optimisation
with opneSSL.
-abhi
I don¹t know the UI doesn't show the status of the agent running on SSVM ?
This would greatly help the admin understand why the SSVM related
functionalities (like template, volume etc.) are not working.
I have created a UI bug - CLOUDSTACK-2760. Feel free to vote for this and
even bump the priorit
Chiradeep,
As I understood that conversation, it was about permanently changing
the length of release cycles. I am proposing that we acknowledge the
impact of the longer than anticipated 4.1.0 release, and push out
4.2.0. 4.3.0 would still be a four month release cycle, it would just
start X wee
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:02 AM, murali reddy
> wrote:
> > We should do a health-check of
> On May 30, 2013, 8:56 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> > Daan,
> >
> > I noticed quite a few tabs in your patch. The CloudStack standard is to use
> > spaces instead of tabs. Can you change the patch to fix this?
> >
> > Other comments below.
> >
> > Can you explain what tests you executed to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11510/
---
(Updated May 30, 2013, 11:22 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh
Additional Tests Cases executed :
1. Deploy setup with only one host.
Enabling zone will create sys vms on the host and it will be marked as Shared.
Deploy VM from the account with Implict preferred. It will try in strict and
then tried Shared and created instance in the available single
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10970/
---
(Updated May 30, 2013, 11:58 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy,
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:02:32AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:36 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
> >
> > On Thu, May
Hi Edison…
The table is empty, which would indicate the error message I see on the console
is accurate. However, that I see the VM running in XenServer and I have it
listed in the Infrastructure area in CS doesn't make much sense.
David La Motta
Technical Marketing Engineer
Citrix Solutions
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:02:32AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:36 PM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re:
David - Can you please follow
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/ssvm-troubleshooting.html to
troubleshoot the issues ?
Let us know how it goes ?
On 30/05/13 7:02 PM, "La Motta, David" wrote:
>Hi EdisonŠ
>
>The table is empty, which would indicate the error message I see on the
>console is accu
Sorry for missing the mail. I would need the new volume view for my
feature to work.
On 24/05/13 1:45 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>It is related to this commit d1642a489ce76e055d60b2caf3ccfe4bb136b745.
>Schema-410to420.sql should have one section to define the new volume_view
>for 4.2.0.
>CC Nitin he
David and Chip,
To be clear about my proposal, I did not intend to propose that we push back
the feature freeze by x days of time and subtract x days from testing. My
intention is to add those days into the cycle without reducing the test window
-- pushing the release date out x days.
Anoth
Hi all,
I would like to merge UI support for Explicit Dedication of Resources(
Zone/Pod/Cluster/Host) . The entire development has been done on my feature
branch - [ asf/UI-explicitDedication ]
-Includes the following UI functionality -
1) Zone dedication at the time of its creation through the
4.2 already has lot of features ( Around 70+ features ) added and require
hardening once feature freeze happens. This release is bigger than any other
release. Even though 1 round of testing is being done for majority of the
features, there are quite a few that require community help to build q
LS,
Has there ever been discussion about implementing maintenance mode for
secondary storage? And are people thinking about this?
thanks
Daan Hoogland
Welcome Ian !
On 30/05/13 3:05 AM, "Ian Duffy" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>My name is Ian Duffy and I will be working on the the project titled "LDAP
>User provisioning". I am a Computer Science Student at Dublin City
>University in Ireland. I have interests in virtualization, automation,
>information sy
Edison,
Please see my comment in-line.
Thanks,
-John
On May 29, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:41 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [MERGE]obje
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:52:28PM +, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> 4.2 already has lot of features ( Around 70+ features ) added and require
> hardening once feature freeze happens. This release is bigger than any other
> release. Even though 1 round of testing is being done for majority of the
Hi folks:
I came across an interesting problem today, and think it's one that
deserves fixing.
I looked at our jenkins config and found that we build packages in a
manner that is different from how our documentation tells users to
build those packages. IMO while there may be more than one way to
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:22:49PM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote:
> Thank you for comment,
>
> SSP is an SDN controller that creates L2 virtual network
> backed by vxlan. In cloudstack, the service will shows as
> "connectivity" networking service provider.
> I'm sorry that the description is so shor
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote.
>
+1
Checked sigs and hashes
Built
Packaged RPMs for EL6.4 (using nonoss profile)
Did some basic testing
--David
I think there does need to be some course correction, but perhaps we
should look at the development cycle overall and the lessons learned
from 4.1. Did we not allocate enough time for bugfixing? Did we allow
too many low-quality merges for the time allotted? Did we have issues
with the overlap (al
Just so that we are 100% clear... I'm -1 (binding veto) on this merge right
now due to the technical issues being discussed below. No single issue
should be the focus, and instead we should start focusing on
collaboratively fixing this branch up so that it's coming into master
with high quality a
Hi,
I would like to merge disk_io_stat branch into master.
If nobody object, I will merge into master in 48 hours.
The feature includes
(1) Add disk I/O polling for instances to CloudStack.
(2) Add it to the instance vm disk statistics table.
(3) and add it to the usage database for optional b
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:50:27PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to merge UI support for Explicit Dedication of Resources(
> Zone/Pod/Cluster/Host) . The entire development has been done on my feature
> branch - [ asf/UI-explicitDedication ]
>
> -Includes the following
On 05/30/2013 05:47 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Hi,
I would like to merge disk_io_stat branch into master.
If nobody object, I will merge into master in 48 hours.
First of all, awesome work! I created the ticket but never came around
implementing it.
I took a quick look at the code and saw this in
Uh, we may have a problem. I deployed a fresh 4.1 two days ago, it
worked, and then I deployed current 4.1 on a separate test system (on
top of existing, but redeployed the db) and got this:
2013-05-30 09:51:30,975 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-19:job-19) Unexpected except
Hi,
I would like to merge disk_io_throttling branch into master.
If nobody object, I will merge into master in 48 hours.
The purpose is :
Virtual machines are running on the same storage device (local storage or
share strage). Because of the rate limitation of device (such as iops), if
one VM has
cc'ing prachi
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Uh, we may have a problem. I deployed a fresh 4.1 two days ago, it
> worked, and then I deployed current 4.1 on a separate test system (on
> top of existing, but redeployed the db) and got this:
>
> 2013-05-30 09:51
For now, this support KVM only.
2013/5/30 Wei ZHOU
> Hi,
> I would like to merge disk_io_throttling branch into master.
> If nobody object, I will merge into master in 48 hours.
> The purpose is :
>
> Virtual machines are running on the same storage device (local storage or
> share strage). Bec
Hi Wido,
I have not tested on network block devices like Ceph, as I have no testing
environment.
I will change the source code and point out this does not support network
block devices.
It will support in the future.
-Wei
2013/5/30 Wido den Hollander
> On 05/30/2013 05:47 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote
For now, This supports KVM only. There is an issue in Xen support as xenapi
returns I/O rate (bytes per seconds) instead of total I/O.
-Wei
2013/5/30 Wei ZHOU
> Hi Wido,
>
> I have not tested on network block devices like Ceph, as I have no testing
> environment.
> I will change the source co
Wido, thanks for you review.
QEMU/libvirt can get the bytes/iops for individual volume.
path(or uuid) is a connection between volume (in cloudstack database) and
volume (in QEMU).
However, the first volume in QEMU is ROOTDISK, second volune is DATADISK.
Maybe I can use this to get the value for R
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:33:22PM +, La Motta, David wrote:
> Cool, thanks.
>
> I saw a reference to a NetApp plugin on that page. Would you know who from
> NetApp was working on this, if anybody?
I'm not sure that any developers working here are employed by NetApp.
git log shows that mos
Thanks Chip for reminding me of that . I have rebased my branch off latest
master now and there are no conflicts . Please go ahead and have a look at the
diff .
Please let me know in case there are any concerns.
Thanks,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child.
I think we need to add an 'mvn clean' to the cloud.spec prior to
building. Normally, I can build RPMs, do a pull or change some code,
then build RPMs, and the changes are reflected and everything is fine.
However, after running 'git clean -fxd', then rebuilding the same
code, reinstalling, the pro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11510/
---
(Updated May 30, 2013, 4:39 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:23:31AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> I think we need to add an 'mvn clean' to the cloud.spec prior to
> building. Normally, I can build RPMs, do a pull or change some code,
> then build RPMs, and the changes are reflected and everything is fine.
> However, after runni
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:43:46PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> Users are *by definition* people who do not vote. The minute a user votes
> they become a developer. ;)
>
> I agree with you that interaction with the user@ list should use inclusive
> language, and should call for participation in the
Hi,
I am Shiva Teja, 2nd year computer science undergrad student from IIT
Mandi, India. I'll be working on #CLOUDSTACK-1778 "Create a new bootstrap
based GUI for CloudStack". I like algorithm research, web development and a
bit of system administration.
I'll be creating a new UI for CloudStack us
Please work with Jessica to consolidate the two views created by you two
to come up with a final volume_view.
Thanks
-min
On 5/30/13 6:46 AM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote:
>Sorry for missing the mail. I would need the new volume view for my
>feature to work.
>
>On 24/05/13 1:45 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>
Hi Nitin,
I left both of the "volumes" views in the codebase when I submitted my
patch for review.
Just curious, though...can you tell me why there are two places where the
view is created?
Thanks!
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Sorry for missing the mail. I would need
Thanks Chip.
I've posted this response under CLOUDSTACK-2492.. curious what others may think
about a long term solution to this problem..
--
I think we should make the whole NTP schema more modular and robust.
For example, in my experience working for several companies, not even on
Marcus,
I think it best to defer the larger release cycle length question to another
time and place. As Chip stated earlier, the consensus is to maintain the
current freeze date. Given the time sensitivity, my proposal can be considered
resolved.
Thanks,
-John
On May 30, 2013, at 11:34 AM,
The reason is simple, just two people are trying to change that view for their
own features, but didn't check if there is one already in that script to modify
that instead of creating their own.
Thanks
-min
From: Mike Tutkowski
mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, May 30, 20
Ilya,
One very important note is that NTP is only used for Xen. For KVM and VMWare,
time sync is accomplished through kernel drivers/system daemons with NTP
configured in the hypervisor configuration. Therefore, this model would need
to be conditional based on the hypervisor type -- possibly
Sounds reasonable
So, anyways, I left them both in my patch file since I figured we could
resolve this later (obviously only the second "volumes" view is really
being used anyways).
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Min Chen wrote:
> The reason is simple, just two people are trying to change
Hello Shiva, I am your mentor, lol.
How's it going? I'm pretty excited about your project.
Are you still planning to integrate Flask into your project?
- Original Message -
From: "Shiva Teja"
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:54:26 AM
Subject: Re: [GSOC] Commu
Hey Kelcey,
I was about to send an email off-list with updates.
Yes, the wrapper API
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage wrote:
> Hello Shiva, I am your mentor, lol.
>
> How's it going? I'm pretty excited about your project.
>
> Are you still planning to integrate Flask into
Oops, pressed send by mistake.
Yes, the wrapper API will use Flask.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Shiva Teja wrote:
> Hey Kelcey,
>
> I was about to send an email off-list with updates.
> Yes, the wrapper API
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
> wrote:
>
>> Hell
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:42:40PM +0530, Shiva Teja wrote:
> I was about to send an email off-list with updates.
On-list is best please (probably with a distinct subject like to start a
new thread).
Welcome by the way!
Not that I have heard of. You can at best replace the sec. storage (there
is a manual procedure for that), but since generally there is a single
sec. storage how can you implement maintenance mode ?
Can you please explain is your use case ?
On 30/05/13 7:32 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>LS,
>
>Has
Marcus,
After a clean build did your problem disappear? I don't see a reason for a
NoSuchMethodError popping up, except that as you say cleaning the repository is
needed.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:4
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:29:36PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> Thanks Chip for reminding me of that . I have rebased my branch off latest
> master now and there are no conflicts . Please go ahead and have a look at
> the diff .
> Please let me know in case there are any concerns.
>
> Thanks,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:18:51PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> I will tentatively say yes - pending my discussion with Chip on Thursday on
> the process.
>
> Regards
> ilya
Ilya and I spoke. There are a couple of things that *we* should
probably document about the role / process within our co
I'd say Cluster setting.
We should let users pick if they want to use hypervisor tools based sync or
local/external NTP servers.
I'm all for local/external NTP servers, as I know how those never gave me
issues in past (especially when you go through hypervisors upgrades and vm
tools upgrades).
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:18:27PM +, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to merge support for zone wide primary storage for VMware
> resources in CloudStack deployment. This is incremental piece of work to
> extend zone wide primary storage pool support to VMware.
> Earlier
Thanks Chip.
Officially accepted, I'm going to create git-monitor scripts to email me of
daily git changes and see if they are applicable to 4.1.x.
I'll share the script once I have it working, perhaps it can be used by other
RMs.
Regards
ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childer
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:35:36PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Thanks Chip.
>
> Officially accepted, I'm going to create git-monitor scripts to email me of
> daily git changes and see if they are applicable to 4.1.x.
>
> I'll share the script once I have it working, perhaps it can be used by o
So currently they are not localized. Usually we localize all the labels ,
dialog messages whenever a feature is into master and I had planned to do the
same with this one as well . Since that doesn't affect the feature
functionality , I thought of merging the feature before so that people(QA )
I'm actually OK with delaying the release (as you pointed out, 4.1
impacted 4.2 in a big way). *I* like flexibility. But it behooves the
community to have a stable set of rules.
It is the cognitive dissonance that bothers me. Theoretically a time-based
release doesn't care about such impacts, but
IIya,
I can't speak to KVM, but on VMWare, clock sync won't work without tools.
It's not an option.
Thanks,
-John
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> I'd say Cluster setting.
>
> We should let users pick if they want to use hypervisor tools based sync
> or local/external
Yes, I don't think it's a blocker either, now that I know what's going
on. I'll get that added.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> After a clean build did your problem disappear? I don't see a reason for a
> NoSuchMethodError popping up, except that as you say cl
Ok, that's fine. Thanks--I figured it would be simpler to ask the group,
rather than chase somebody in NetApp internally ;-)
If anybody has any NetApp-related questions, I may be able to help, so feel
free to send them my way.
David La Motta
Technical Marketing Engineer
Citrix Solutions
Net
I can see a use for that: that the secondary storage becomes read-only
during the maintenance (so no template creation/snapshots/etc). This
allows for stuff like migration to new (file server) hardware.
On 5/30/13 10:20 AM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote:
>Not that I have heard of. You can at best replace
Hi All,
While voting is in progress for 4.1, can you take a look at the following
features which are still in open/resolved state.
If a story is in resolved state, can reporter review it and close it??
If a story is in open state( there are 4 in the below list) I would think it
will be moved to
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:48:02PM +, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While voting is in progress for 4.1, can you take a look at the following
> features which are still in open/resolved state.
> If a story is in resolved state, can reporter review it and close it??
> If a story is in
+1 for zone-level NTP server setting. If not set, use the default one
(e.g., the ntpd package in Debian automatically use the ntp pool)
On 5/30/13 10:43 AM, "John Burwell" wrote:
>IIya,
>
>I can't speak to KVM, but on VMWare, clock sync won't work without tools.
> It's not an option.
>
>Thanks,
John,
For vmware, you have 2 options, clock sync will work with native NTP daemon
using local ntp servers in your datacenter or use vmware tools native time
keeping technique.
We have over 2500 VMs, and while we have vmware tools installed on all vms, we
choose to use native linux NTPD for tim
I agree with Chip, lets keep all discussion open, and we can create a [DISCUSS]
thread if need be.
I am currently working on a Flask based UI/API for cloud platforms
management(The layer above CloudStack).
- Original Message -
From: "Chip Childers"
To: [email protected]
Sent: T
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:14:04PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> John,
>
> For vmware, you have 2 options, clock sync will work with native NTP daemon
> using local ntp servers in your datacenter or use vmware tools native time
> keeping technique.
>
> We have over 2500 VMs, and while we have v
I forgot to mention, with option 1, you should have the least issues regardless
of what hypervisor technology you use - even if you go with HyperV :)
And I think Chiradeep is right, it should be Zone based, since this is when
SSVM and CPVM gets created.
> -Original Message-
> From: Musa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11510/#review21201
---
Unit test is failing while trying mvn clean install
Tests in error
Yes Chiradeep,
That or maintenance on the secondary storage machine itself.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I can see a use for that: that the secondary storage becomes read-only
> during the maintenance (so no template creation/snapshot
On 05/30/2013 07:43 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
I'm actually OK with delaying the release (as you pointed out, 4.1
impacted 4.2 in a big way). *I* like flexibility. But it behooves the
community to have a stable set of rules.
It is the cognitive dissonance that bothers me. Theoretically a time
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
