Re: activemq architecture with jboss

On 8/16/06, masien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Execuse me but i am new in JMS and ActiveMQ... I'd like to create an architecture with a client that send messages to 2 brokers (in cluster) and a MDB that consume the messages. Must I use JBOSS for use MDB? MDBs are supported by all J2EE

Re: activemq architecture with jboss

When I configure two instance of JBOSS...must to point each instance to each ActiveMQ broker ? P.S. The client producer is on another jvm and it send messages to brokers that are on other two virtual machine. Max -- View this message in context:

Re: activemq architecture with jboss

On 8/17/06, masien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I configure two instance of JBOSS...must to point each instance to each ActiveMQ broker ? P.S. The client producer is on another jvm and it send messages to brokers that are on other two virtual machine. If you have 2 JBoss servers hosting

Re: Queue hogging by a single consumer.

Hi James, Thanks for your response. Are you trying to implement request-response with A, B, C making requests on Z and getting the response? Or can A, B, C process any message from Z? Exactly the first case. A, B, C making requests on Z and getting the response from Z I'm not sure

Re: Queue hogging by a single consumer.

On 8/17/06, Naveen Rawat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi James, Thanks for your response. Are you trying to implement request-response with A, B, C making requests on Z and getting the response? Or can A, B, C process any message from Z? Exactly the first case. A, B, C making requests on Z

Re: Queue hogging by a single consumer.

Thanks James. Thanks for the response I will try out your suggestions and get back to you soon. Hi James, Thanks for your response. Are you trying to implement request-response with A, B, C making requests on Z and getting the response? Or can A, B, C process any message

RE: How To remove Queue from the session

I am working on openwire-cpp ( for ActiveMQ-4.0) code on SuSe(Linux machine-i686-suse-linux, version 2.6.13-15.8-default), in C++ . How to remove/deattached a queue from the session without closeing connection from the sender/reveiver side?. is it possible? Close the Consumer or Producer

How To remove Queue from the session

Hi all, I am working on openwire-cpp ( for ActiveMQ-4.0) code on SuSe(Linux machine-i686-suse-linux, version 2.6.13-15.8-default), in C++ . How to remove/deattached a queue from the session without closeing connection from the sender/reveiver side?. is it possible? Thanks Arashad

Re: How To remove Queue from the session

Hi Bish, When I use session-close() API then the following error comes up.. [FAILED] Message content has been corrupted and this does not remove the queue from the receiver side is there any other API for that please tell me. I am working on openwire-cpp ( for ActiveMQ-4.0) code on

[jira] Created: (AMQ-882) TopicPublisher.publish(topicSession.createTextMessage(Hello World) hangs and throws a JMSException

TopicPublisher.publish(topicSession.createTextMessage(Hello World) hangs and throws a JMSException Key: AMQ-882 URL:

RE: How To remove Queue from the session

When I use session-close() API then the following error comes up.. [FAILED] Message content has been corrupted Sounds like a possible bug in the openwire-cpp code. IF you can write a small test app that demonstrates the problem you could submit an issue and hopefully the openwire-cpp

Re: How To remove Queue from the session

On 8/17/06, Arshad Ahamad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bish, No no. I am not talking about the temporary queue, I am asking about the nameing queue. I don't follow what you're asking. FWIW queues only really exist on the broker (they are not really associated with a client or session).

Re: Queue hogging by a single consumer.

On 8/17/06, Naveen Rawat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great James Your suggestion is working. A major hurdle seems solved. A little query down there. Hi James, Thanks for your response. Are you trying to implement request-response with A, B, C making requests on Z and getting the

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-865) C# Client's Listener doesn't receive messages if you don't explicitly call Subscribe

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-865?page=comments#action_36801 ] james strachan commented on AMQ-865: Here's another test case which seems to show a similar issue...

Global JNDI

Earlier this week, David convinced me to help him get the JPA entity manager factories mapped into JNDI. And, that was the easy part, he also wanted it to work in G 1.1. Today, I finally got it working and wrote up some very rudimentary instruction on how to manually install it (need to

Queue hogging by a single consumer.

Hi all :) I am working with the binary version of ActiveMQ 4.0 broker and trying out the openwire cpp apis for asynchronous messaging. [https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/tags/activemq-4.0/openw ire-cpp] I wonder if I m resurrecting the mummies of issues already burnt.

[jira] Assigned: (AMQ-877) Patch: refactoring to allow alternative (using different storage interface) Destinations implementations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877?page=all ] Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-877: -- Assignee: Rob Davies Patch: refactoring to allow alternative (using different storage interface) Destinations implementations.

Re: Issue for 4.x version is not being looked at

Somebody needed to take ownership and then assign a fix schedule for it (done) cheers, Rob On 17 Aug 2006, at 02:01, Fateev, Maxim wrote: I've submitted a patch at Friday against 4.x: http:// issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877 But it doesn't show up in the list of outstanding

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-877) Patch: refactoring to allow alternative (using different storage interface) Destinations implementations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877?page=all ] Rob Davies updated AMQ-877: --- Fix Version/s: 4.1 Patch: refactoring to allow alternative (using different storage interface) Destinations implementations.

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome alan Cabrera as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

On 8/14/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to let everyone know that Alan Cabrera has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. We are excited to have Alan assisting with project oversight in addition to his technical contributions to

GERONIMO-2324

So does anyone have any ideas on an agreeable solution to this JIRA? I don't think David's comments in the JIRA as an alternate solution don't fully address the problem.(1) Need to be able to provide external individual jar entries to the shared library(2) Need to be able to add additional

Re: [WELCOME] Guillaume Nodet has accepted an invitation to join the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations Guillaume! Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Please join us in welcoming Guillaume who recently accepted an invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. Guillaume is probably best known for his work on Xbean and ServiceMix. Has always been available to

Re: GERONIMO-2324

Hi Sachin, I apologize in advance if I say anything exceedingly ignorant and/or foolish... Given that this functionality is meant for a relatively specific use case (utilizing Geronimo as a developer's test environment), and that having this functionality in a production environment is generally

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-867) JMX Management Console Not Working As Documented

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-867?page=comments#action_36799 ] Douglas A. Seifert commented on AMQ-867: Willing to close this as the workaround works. The shutdown (and others) script works as well, but if you change

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2 (RC 3)

Maybe it's time to ask the incubator PMC to vote on this release ? On 8/8/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some NOTICE file issues were found in the 2nd release candidate of the 4.0.2 build. I have cut and RC 3 of the 4.0.2 build with the fixes and it's available here:

Re: Organization and versioning of specs; a new proposal

I'm ok with dropping it. -dain On Aug 16, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I have always been in favor of dropping any uber-jars. They cause more problems then they are worth. As for RTC... I am not so sure that this applies really. Its not going to surprise anyone, its not adding

[jira] Created: (AMQ-883) NMS asynchronous consumption of queued messages

NMS asynchronous consumption of queued messages --- Key: AMQ-883 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-883 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Bug Components: NMS (C# client)

Re: GERONIMO-2324

I feel strongly that is should be stated: Testing is not a relatively specific use case but a natural stage in a lifecycle of an application. You cannot grow into an adult without being a kid first. And how well one were treated as a child, how much warmth one received from parents - defines the

Re: m2 build - validating

inline... --- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Bill Dudney wrote: Hi All, i've been using the m2 build for several days now and I've noticed that while it works well there are several details that are still not nailed down. Particularly I've

Re: m2 build - validating

Oops.., the correct link is : http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200605.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: inline... --- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:

Re: m2 build - validating

IMO we should not overload the scope mechanism here, but define new configuration elements that allow us to add the additional metadata needed just like how I added classpathPrefix to be used to control the prefix for manifest entries. Then the m2 dependencies would only really be used

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

Okay, next wednesday, the 23rd, ~midnight it is. I will send email that day in the afternoon and then before and after the move. --jason On Aug 16, 2006, at 7:33 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Jason, I'd suggest Wednesday night midnight (Thursday morning 0001 PT) as most peeps will be

[jira] Commented: (SM-529) Servicemix-Component's MPSSettingTest.java hangs indefinitely.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-529?page=comments#action_36802 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-529: Seems to run fine also for me. Do you have the associated log file ? Servicemix-Component's MPSSettingTest.java hangs

Re: GERONIMO-2324

On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:46 AM, System Architect wrote:I feel strongly that is should be stated: Testing is not a "relatively specific use case" but a natural stage in a lifecycle of an application. You cannot grow into an adult without being a kid first. And how well one were treated as a child,

Re: GERONIMO-2324

On 8/17/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:46 AM, System Architect wrote:I feel strongly that is should be stated: Testing is not a relatively specific use case but a natural stage in a lifecycle of an application. You cannot grow into an adult without being a kid

[jira] Created: (SM-547) When the xbean deployer throws a RuntimeException or Error on first deployment, redeployment of the SU fails

When the xbean deployer throws a RuntimeException or Error on first deployment, redeployment of the SU fails Key: SM-547 URL:

[jira] Resolved: (SM-547) When the xbean deployer throws a RuntimeException or Error on first deployment, redeployment of the SU fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-547?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-547. Resolution: Fixed Author: gnodet Date: Thu Aug 17 10:14:03 2006 New Revision: 432299 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432299view=rev Log: SM-547: When

Re: GERONIMO-2324

On Aug 17, 2006, at 1:04 PM, System Architect wrote:On 8/17/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:46 AM, System Architect wrote:I feel strongly that is should be stated: Testing is not a "relatively specific use case" but a natural stage in a lifecycle of an application.

Re: Global JNDI

Dain Sundstrom wrote: Earlier this week, David convinced me to help him get the JPA entity manager factories mapped into JNDI. And, that was the easy part, he also wanted it to work in G 1.1. Today, I finally got it working and wrote up some very rudimentary instruction on how to manually

Re: [WELCOME] Guillaume Nodet has accepted an invitation to join the Geronimo PMC

Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, Please join us in welcoming Guillaume who recently accepted an invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. Guillaume is probably best known for his work on Xbean and ServiceMix. Has always been available to help out folks and is a great example of working in the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Grant McDonald as our newest committer

Guillaume Nodet wrote: We're pleased to announce that Grant McDonald has accepted the invitation to join Apache ServiceMix as a committer. Welcome Grant, and congratulations ! Congratulations Grant! Regards, Alan

Re: Organization and versioning of specs; a new proposal

David Blevins wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 4:38 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:21 PM, David Blevins wrote: I guess I'd still prefer we do artifactId-version for the tag names as

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-1739) Plugin migration to Maven 2: geronimo-izpack-plugin

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1739?page=all ] Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-1739. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Strategy for installer needs to be reevaluated before any more work is done on integration with m2. Plugin migration to Maven

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

+1 Regards, Alan David Blevins wrote: +1, it's gotten a bit awkward the way we have it now. -David On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more consistent.

Re: Console JACC Security Error in 1.1.1

FYI. Fixed. Regards, Alan Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I found the problem and will fix it tonight. Regards, Alan Aaron Mulder wrote: I'm not sure if this is related to the recent web app security fix or not. I hacked the build enough that I got the 1.1.1 server running. I went to the

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2174) Remove modules/console-web

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2174?page=comments#action_12428737 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2174: This is a pending merge from dead-1.2... {quote} r383111 | jlaskowski | 2006-03-04 05:26:30 -0800 (Sat, 04

Re: m2 build - validating

--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMO we should not overload the scope mechanism here, but define new configuration elements that allow us to add the additional metadata needed Bill, if you do not want to improve the existing car-maven-plugin, you will need to use

Trimmed more Unnecessary changes out of all_changes.log

I've pruned most of the build system changes, and the javamail- transport bits. Down to 113 revisions marked as Not Merged. --jason

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1557) When you enter the url of a web service in the console You should get a page showing the service name

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1557?page=comments#action_12428740 ] Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-1557: This has applied to 1.1.1 - Revision: 423005 Author: djencks Date: 4:08:10 AM, Tuesday, July 18, 2006

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1986) TranQL Connector doesn't check Driver Class during deployment

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1986?page=all ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1986: --- Fix Version/s: 1.1.2 (was: 1.1.x) Affects Version/s: 1.1 1.1.2 TranQL Connector doesn't

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2113) Geronimo doesn't start if restarted using another JDK

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2113?page=all ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2113: --- Fix Version/s: 1.1.2 1.2 (was: 1.1.x) Affects Version/s: 1.1.1 1.2

Fwd: Trimmed more Unnecessary changes out of all_changes.log

FYI, I added pending-merge-log.sh which will svn log the remaining changes to easily see what needs to be done.--jasonBegin forwarded message:From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: August 17, 2006 11:52:27 AM PDTTo: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject: Trimmed more Unnecessary changes out of

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2174) Remove modules/console-web

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2174?page=all ] Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2174. -- Fix Version/s: 1.2 Resolution: Fixed Remove modules/console-web Key: GERONIMO-2174

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-1672) Module migration to Maven2: security

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1672?page=all ] Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-1672. -- Fix Version/s: 1.2 (was: 1.x) Resolution: Fixed This module is converted to m2. Module migration to Maven2: security

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-1644) Migrate kernel module to Maven2

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1644?page=all ] Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-1644. -- Fix Version/s: 1.2 Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jason Dillon (was: Jacek Laskowski) This module is converted to m2. Migrate kernel

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1813) When already deployed application is hot deployed once gain , Server doesn't delete the module from hot deployed directory

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1813?page=all ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1813: --- Attachment: hotdeploy_projectxml_06042006.txt Also need to apply hotdeploy_projectxml_06042006.txt (which was created against the latest 1.1.1

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2113) Geronimo doesn't start if restarted using another JDK

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2113?page=comments#action_12428764 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2113: What is up with this issue? Seems like lowhanging fruit... Patch is complaining though: {noformat}

CreateSession fails and remains in wait mode in C#

Hello, I am trying to use the .Net Message Service API(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet/) in C# to communicate to ACtive MQ. Using the following code i am able to successfully connect to Activer MQ but when i am trying to create a session using

Re: Global JNDI

On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Dain Sundstrom wrote: Earlier this week, David convinced me to help him get the JPA entity manager factories mapped into JNDI. And, that was the easy part, he also wanted it to work in G 1.1. Today, I finally got it working and wrote

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-883) NMS asynchronous consumption of queued messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-883?page=all ] james strachan resolved AMQ-883. Fix Version/s: 4.1 Resolution: Fixed Thanks for the suggestions and ideas on how to fix it! :) I've added a bunch more test cases to AsyncConsumeTest

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-865) C# Client's Listener doesn't receive messages if you don't explicitly call Subscribe

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-865?page=all ] james strachan resolved AMQ-865. Fix Version/s: 4.1 Resolution: Fixed Patch applied in SVN trunk if you want to try along with the test cases for this issue and the related AMQ-883

Re: CreateSession fails and remains in wait mode in C#

Ah - you are connecting on the default stomp port (61613) could you try connecting on 61616? On 8/17/06, Sudhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am trying to use the .Net Message Service API(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet/) in C# to communicate to

Re: CreateSession fails and remains in wait mode in C#

Thanks a lot. It worked. Sorry it was my mistake. James.Strachan wrote: Ah - you are connecting on the default stomp port (61613) could you try connecting on 61616? On 8/17/06, Sudhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am trying to use the .Net Message Service

Re: m2 build - validating

On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Bill, if you do not want to improve the existing car-maven-plugin, you will need to use the scope. Who said anything about not wanting to improve it? just like how I added classpathPrefix to be used to control the prefix for

Re: m2 build - validating

And it seems I have the magic incantation now :-) Going to see how well I can cast it on the car plugin later today. --jason On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: --- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMO we should not overload the scope mechanism here, but

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2307) Include appropriate license for the Sun j2ee schema files that are redistributed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428791 ] Geir Magnusson Jr commented on GERONIMO-2307: - following a voice discussion, I've asked formally for Sun to a) confirm no problem with typing the

Re: New car-maven-plugin issue

I have seen this problem happen only when a m1 repo is in the mix... something about m2 getting confused about metadata.xml bits...Do you have an m1 repo in your build?--jasonOn Aug 15, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:Trying to build a plugin to integrate ServiceMix in G 1.1,i' ve just

Re: Organization and versioning of specs; a new proposal

On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: David Blevins wrote: Ok, let's go with specs/tags/artifactId-version This is my preference as well. It is easy enough to change later if/when the top-level tags dir becomes unwieldy... so I am fine with this. --jason

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2307) Include appropriate license for the Sun j2ee schema files that are redistributed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428806 ] Geir Magnusson Jr commented on GERONIMO-2307: - Clearly the documents as is are not appropriate for redistribution, as they say no redistribution.

Release schedule

I am wondering what would be the estimate date for 4.1 release? Do we have an idea of when and what releases are going to happen? How many more 4.0.x releases will we have? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a5860619 Sent from the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2 (RC 3)

Yep. I'll run the tally. On 8/17/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it's time to ask the incubator PMC to vote on this release ? On 8/8/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some NOTICE file issues were found in the 2nd release candidate of the 4.0.2 build. I have cut

[VOTE RESULT] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2 (RC 3)

Hi folks, Thanks for taking the time to check the release. Vote passes with 8 +1's . We just need to get the incubator PMC to now approve the release. +1 Votes: Hiram Chirino James Strachan Rob Davies Guillaume Nodet Kevan Miller Alan D. Cabrera Aaron Mulder Brian McCallister No +/- 0 or

New module: geronimo-testsupport

I'd like to add a new module to our build, geronimo-testsupport, which provides at the moment a single TestSupport class which sets up logging and some other commonly used bits (like the File ref to $ {basedir}). And then incrementally I'd like for all of our test classes to extend from

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2330) mismatched constructor gbean error message doesn't actually show the expected classes

mismatched constructor gbean error message doesn't actually show the expected classes - Key: GERONIMO-2330 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2330

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2330) mismatched constructor gbean error message doesn't actually show the expected classes

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2330?page=all ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2330. -- Resolution: Fixed fixed rev 432413 mismatched constructor gbean error message doesn't actually show the expected classes

Re: New module: geronimo-testsupport

YAY!!! Can you make the File ref to ${basedir} work in idea without setting test properties? thanks david jencks On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I'd like to add a new module to our build, geronimo-testsupport, which provides at the moment a single TestSupport class which

Re: New module: geronimo-testsupport

Most likely. --jason On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:42 PM, David Jencks wrote: YAY!!! Can you make the File ref to ${basedir} work in idea without setting test properties? thanks david jencks On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I'd like to add a new module to our build,

Re: Organization and versioning of specs; a new proposal

I'm trying to motivate to writing this... :-\ --jason On Aug 16, 2006, at 7:41 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: What is the status on 1.1.1 wrt this change? Can I go ahead and make these

Re: Move trunk, tags and branches to server/*

It works great. We've used it in the past for switching to pre- release branches, etc. -David On Aug 16, 2006, at 1:49 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: Maybe... I've never used svn switch before... not sure I would trust it ;-) --jason On Aug 16, 2006, at 1:01 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On

Re: JPA plugin (was Re: Java 1.4 and JEE 5)

On Aug 11, 2006, at 2:41 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:21 AM, David Blevins wrote: I'm going to start a branch tomorrow to experiment with JPA stuff Done. Got a branch up here: - Revision 430900: /geronimo/branches/jpa-plugin Didn't turn out to need this as I'm not

openwire command generation

Hey guys I'm trying to understand the openwire command generator. My first task is just getting it to run and generate commands for the current set of clients.. Once I build the broker I attempt to run the generator with Mvn gram:gram from the activemq-core folder. I get tons of

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome alan Cabrera as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations Alan! Regards, John Matt Hogstrom wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to let everyone know that Alan Cabrera has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. We are excited to have Alan assisting with project oversight in addition to his technical contributions to

Re: [WELCOME] Guillaume Nodet has accepted an invitation to join the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations Guillaume! Regards, John Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, Please join us in welcoming Guillaume who recently accepted an invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. Guillaume is probably best known for his work on Xbean and ServiceMix. Has always been available to help out folks and is

Re: openwire command generation

Hi Tim, Wild, I just ran it and it was ok. Try setting you MAVEN_OPTS shell variable to something like -Xmx800M Regards, Hiram On 8/17/06, Timothy Bish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys I'm trying to understand the openwire command generator. My first task is just getting it to run and

ActiveMQ 4.x in Geronimo

Hey guys can one of you spare a few cycles to help me to get the ActiveMQ integration sorted using 4.x in G 1.2/trunk? Thanks, --jason

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1722) Module migration to Maven 2: activemq-embedded-rar

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1722?page=comments#action_12428852 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-1722: This patch is not valid... does not apply cleanly to trunk... and I can't find these deps in a m2 repo, only

Remove module: installer-support

Since we are not going to put any effort into getting the izpack installer back up in trunk/1.2 right now, I'd like to remove this module. If needed we can always resurrect it later. Objections? --jason

Re: Remove module: installer-support

Go for it. Are you going to move it to the island of mis-fit toys? Remember that Rudolph saved them :) Jason Dillon wrote: Since we are not going to put any effort into getting the izpack installer back up in trunk/1.2 right now, I'd like to remove this module. If needed we can always

Re: Remove module: installer-support

Eh, you mean the box-o-sand? I can though my guess is that they will just fester in there and attract flies. --jason On Aug 17, 2006, at 6:50 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Go for it. Are you going to move it to the island of mis-fit toys? Remember that Rudolph saved them :) Jason Dillon

Re: Remove module: installer-support

Or, create a JIRA and post their demise and the revision number? Not sure how this is normally handled. Just looking for how someone might resurrect the beast later. Our box-o-sand in the backyard attracts cats...lucky you only have flies ;-P Jason Dillon wrote: Eh, you mean the box-o-sand?

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2299) Unpack assemblies for easier development/testing

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2299?page=comments#action_12428864 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2299: So, Java sucks when it comes to file perms... even if we unzip or untgz these files, they will *NOT* have the

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2307) Include appropriate license for the Sun j2ee schema files that are redistributed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ] Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307: If we need to create these then create these we must. Here are the files that I know of in our development tree that need to have substitutes created.

Re: Remove module: installer-support

Well, I defs don't want cats in there... its not a litterbox... and partly why I'm hesitant to toss stuff in there... after a while it might start to smell bad. I think it is reasonable to create an issue to state its going to be dropped, then let the JIRA svn plugin link to it from the

Re: Remove module: installer-support

Or we can make a litterbox as a peer to the sandbox, then get the scooper out quarterly and toss the undesirables. I don't care too much... just want it out of trunk. --jason On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:07 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Or, create a JIRA and post their demise and the revision number?

Re: Release schedule

On 8/17/06, Vadim Pesochinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am wondering what would be the estimate date for 4.1 release? Do we have an idea of when and what releases are going to happen? How many more 4.0.x releases will we have? Now that 4.0.2 is pretty much out (the vote on the Incubator PMC

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2307) Include appropriate license for the Sun j2ee schema files that are redistributed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ] Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307: Description: Geronimo redistributes the Sun J2EE schema files for deployment descriptors etc but doesn't appear to include anything in the global

Re: Where is the source code for the G samples ?

Where in tomcat? Got a SVN URL handy? --jason On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote: We grabbed the jars from Tomcat, unpacked them and manually made a few changes to them (outside of source control) and published the resulting wars. Here is the description of the manual

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2307) Include appropriate license for the Sun j2ee schema files that are redistributed

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428875 ] Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2307: Its so dumb that we have to rewrite these... when to be compliant they need to be identical... content-wise

Re: Remove module: installer-support

Litterbox sounds like the right name...although JIRA linking is probably more appropriate. You have my vote. Jason Dillon wrote: Or we can make a litterbox as a peer to the sandbox, then get the scooper out quarterly and toss the undesirables. I don't care too much... just want it out of

G ActiveMQ 4

We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing 4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2 artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to use the 4.1- SHAPSHOT and then 4.1 when they

  1   2   >