Re: If your evaluating new template engines, what about ZipScript

e/src/main/test/templates/macro_fulltest_test.zs - merged output 4: http://code.google.com/p/zipscript/source/browse/trunk/core/src/main/test/templates/macro_fulltest_result.txt On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joe, > > My advice would be to spe

Re: If your evaluating new template engines, what about ZipScript

uages. That isn't currently in the plan now but certainly would be something on the plate if this language got a foothold. Joe On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For me, it's the "real world apps", *plus* the interest in porting GXP &

If your evaluating new template engines, what about ZipScript

e are some quick links: - homepage: http://zipscript.googlecode.com - Yahoo! UI macro examples: http://code.google.com/p/zipscript/wiki/YUIMacros - Language Syntax Examples http://code.google.com/p/zipscript/wiki/SyntaxExamples Thanks

Re: [S1] [VOTE] Struts 1.3.9 Quality

On 7/21/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 GA +1 GA -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "I felt so good I told the leader how to follow." -- Sly Stone

Re: name inconsistency

I'm going to be substantially offline for the next week. Count this a vote for "var." Joe On 6/28/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What would be the best way to get to an agreement on this? cast a vote? musachy On 6/28/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: name inconsistency

a value into a scope, in sympathy with the JSTL syntax? Joe On 6/27/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any other ideas/opinions on this? musachy On 6/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have to options: > > 1. use "id" in

Re: [s1] ActionContext in execute()?

e in for a while. In fact, the idea you suggest may at one point have been on the roadmap for 1.4. Joe On 3/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just gathering some opinions here... Would it be preferable to accept an ActionContext in execute() rather than the 4 parameters? publ

Re: [s1] Help to Initialize Commands

hen used as bean reference, effectively making it available as named Spring bean instance." May save you some coding...Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: ServletRequestAware Interface doubled

nce we are not in production yet, we should work on clean interfaces and risk some minor/easy to fix code breaks for users. +1 -- now is the time, definitely. -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune.&

Struts2 and Java 1.4 (Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.4 Quality)

patible jars are a convenience for some users, but I do not think they should be considered fully supported or a blocking issue for a Struts 2 release. Anyone strongly disagree? Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.4 Quality

f OGNL. +1 beta -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts Annotations 1.0.0

likely that the "struts-annotations-101-staging" repository will not be around for ever. I will allow that this may be more about formality than anything else, and I won't object to a build done this way, but it seemed worth mentioning. Maybe someone else feels more strongly about

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts Annotations 1.0.0

+1 worked for me as well Ditto. +1 -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: Struts service facade

-- in any case, better than writing directly to the output stream, which I'd generally only want to do with downloads or other binary data. I don't know if this helps at all... Joe On 1/23/07, einundswanzig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Im new in Struts, in fact im pret

Re: [S2] Freemarker 2.3.8? ( was Re: [S2] Freemarker Confusion)

atibility issues considered more substantial? -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [S2] Freemarker 2.3.8? ( was Re: [S2] Freemarker Confusion)

;rules" or some semblance thereof might be helpful. Joe On 1/21/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We've been running against freemarker 2.3.4. Has anyone tried using 2.3.8? Should we update our dependency from 2.3.4 to 2.3.8 ? * http://freemarker.org/docs/app_versions

Re: [S2] Freemarker Confusion

Tom: Thanks for your help... I see now that the syntax I was trying to use was added in Freemarker 2.3.7 http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/versions_2_3_7.html Now... is an empty string the right result? maybe ${error?default("")} ? is that overkill? Joe On 1/20/07, Tom

[S2] Freemarker Confusion

self, except apparently I haven't found Freemarker syntax documentation which is right for our environment. Thanks Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: Struts 2.0.3 tag broken (was Re: struts-2.0.3-all.jar missing files?)

posed to always go look for new snapshots unless you specify differently. But if Rene's solution works, that makes sense. -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: Struts 2.0.3 tag broken (was Re: struts-2.0.3-all.jar missing files?)

unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PR

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

include including other tiles processing.) If the tag which does this never includes a literal string, I would not find that a big problem. But if I need to know ahead of time whether I want to insert a template or a definition, I think that's a shortcoming. Joe On 1/16/07, Antonio Petrell

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

they're out there" as "we really oughta use 'em" -- especially since we resolved one of the questions I had about verbosity. I think people should remember that they are out there. I'm not sure I've found a critical use case for them yet, either in Tiles or in S

JSTL functions in *struts* JSP tags

thought was foo At least if we do have a use case for JSTL functions, we could use the ActionContext threadlocal to get our hands on the ServletContext, etc. Is it worth doing something for just the simplest case, or should I just get used to a little extra clutter in my pages? Joe -- Joe Germu

mvn deployment best practices? (Re: Permissions problems deploying to snapshot repo)

dly, do we have any rules, or even guidelines, about when we should deploy SNAPSHOTs to the repo? I can't think of any particular reason, but I don't want to just bust off doing it whenever the whim strikes me, unless people think that's OK. Joe On 1/12/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROT

Permissions problems deploying to snapshot repo (Re: Failed build of svn HEAD on Mac OS X)

nnotations-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar on the repo server? Joe On 1/12/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This was actually just fixed in an obscure side dependency, struts-annotations (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392) I haven't deployed snapshots to the Apache repo

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

ow is substantially more clear than what was there before. But I do apologize for my haste. Joe On 1/12/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David H. DeWolf ha scritto: > 2) rename tiles:put to tiles:putAttribute I don't know, if you rename you should rename also the e

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

make these changes, although I'm not totally up to speed on Tiles development, the move to TLP, etc; if someone who has been more active wants to do it, I'll gladly defer. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

On 1/11/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I inferred the intent. I'm not sure if I agree with it or not, but I really haven't thought about it much. I agree there was lots of room for simplification and clarification in Tiles, so I won't say it was the w

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

plification and clarification are sometimes at odds with each other! Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

[Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

led. In any case, I thought it would be interesting to see what people think of JSTL functions in Struts and/or Tiles even if this isn't the right case for them. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Is there a release schedule?

Hello all, I just checked out the 2.0.1 beta and was very pleased, but I couldn't find any information on a planned release schedule for 2.0 on the wiki. Can anybody point me in the right direction? Keep up the excellent work all,

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [X ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 No, let it remain Beta quality -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever

Re: Locale resolver (Re: WW/SAF2 i18n & Cintoo Messages)

At 1:01 PM -0700 6/30/06, Paul Benedict wrote: Joe, First, thanks for pointing out cintoo. I looked at the source and it seems like it could be something s1/2 could share together. Are you interested in investigating this with me? Is anyone else? that wasn't me :) I don't hav

Re: Locale resolver (Re: WW/SAF2 i18n & Cintoo Messages)

lted cookies or request parameters. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new

Re: Struts 1.3.x: Using multiple chain configurations

At 9:07 AM +0100 6/30/06, Phil Zoio wrote: Joe, Could Struts 1.3 set up to have a separate chain per module? Phil: I thought we discussed this two weeks ago. In short, the answer is "yes". Looking back at what I wrote, perhaps I gave too much detail at the wrong time. Here i

Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x

xt under a well known key. It's just that it feels so outdated! Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can bur

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

ution, so that anyone obtaining SAF2 can use Action 1, Action 2, and/or Shale 1? I don't like including either Action 1.3 or Shale 1.x in the SAF 2.0 release. People who need them can get them. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really ca

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

rating "dojo" into its own theme is very much the right approach as well... Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it ca

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

yep. I'm sure that's part of where I started to get the idea (along with the way DWR provides JS from behind a servlet) -- but what Martin is suggesting is presumably more specific to Dojo and not just a way of plugging it into Struts? Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

ts and make the tags do some of the client-side setup and such, but that's really more about convenience than integration to me (and not that convenience isn't important!). What about a modern alternative to the html:javascript tag which consulted serverside validation config?

Re: Struts 1.3.x: Using multiple chain configurations

point out where you think it's unnecessarily complicated? Do you have any ideas about how to do it differently? Joe Phil Joe Germuska wrote: At 9:23 PM +0100 6/13/06, Phil Zoio wrote: Is it possible to have multiple chain configurations for the same Struts 1.3 app. For exampl

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Changing the Semantics of the InsertTag

At 9:00 AM -0700 6/14/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 6/14/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Would you consider some kind of compatibility mode? That is, before you remove support for these, could there be a way for people to configure things for a more strict or more comp

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Changing the Semantics of the InsertTag

/JSPs. Just a thought. I don't have a ton of time to put into it myself, and I wouldn't make a big fuss if it weren't done. Joe At 5:37 PM -0500 6/13/06, Greg Reddin wrote: Ticket SB-21 [1] seeks to simplify the Tiles taglib API. First, it's a given that this

Re: Struts 1.3.x: Using multiple chain configurations

talogs, we would want to make this easier than it is now, but so far we just don't know enough about if or how people are likely to want to do this, so it's hard to know how to make it easier. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really c

Re: Why TagUtils.instance is final static. That cause me a lot of problem.. Is a small change can be done ...?

ted to returning the conventional one? Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try somethin

Re: Some comments & questions on Struts 1.3 chain & Strecks

looked up its CatalogFactory there. I think that in general, the Struts 1.x initialization process is awfully constraining, but I haven't had any substantially better ideas about how to do it. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can

Re: [SAF2] Tossing an idea around: PDFResult

phony.com/webwork/api/com/opensymphony/webwork/views/jasperreports/JasperReportsResult.html Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try som

Re: [SAF2] Tossing an idea around: PDFResult

n with the iText team for eventual integration to their project, or if not, to be served independently. Is there any problem with iText's license? (dual LGPL/MPL)? May be worth a look at PDFBox, which is BSD licensed: http://pdfbox.org/ Just a few fragmentary thoughts... Joe -- Joe Ger

Re: Request to publish Struts 1.3.5

. In my mind, 1.3.5 has not been released yet, and Wendy's test build could be scrapped and a new 1.3.5 produced, but I'm not sure if everyone exactly agrees with all of that. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anythi

Re: Request to publish Struts 1.3.5

ache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=409443 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=408085 along with this: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=406377 (restore Tiles 1.1 registrations), I think 1.3.5 is in pretty good shape. Joe , then the next step would be to tag the

Re: Custom RequestProcessor

command and not extend any request processor! Joe At 4:13 PM -0300 5/25/06, Miguel Galves wrote: Thats because I've worte two emails, and I've changed the name of the classes. I'm using ScyllaTilesRequestProcessor, both in the class and in the config file. On 5/25/06, [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [action1] Snapshot of 1.3.5 available

At 8:10 PM -0700 5/24/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 5/24/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't had a chance to file a bug on this one yet, but I think there's a problem in how the PerformForward command handles modules. (I posted about it to the list but got no res

Re: DWR/Struts integration: why? (Re: JavaOne Ajax Discussion)

org/internet-drafts/draft-crockford-jsonorg-json-04.txt Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it

Re: JavaOne Ajax Discussion

about inconsistent states based on different invocation mechanisms, then I don't see any real objection. I still don't *get it*, but that's my problem :) Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by tryin

Re: DWR/Struts integration: why? (Re: JavaOne Ajax Discussion)

At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote: > Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused about why someone would want to "integrate" DWR with Struts? I've only used it a bit, but

DWR/Struts integration: why? (Re: JavaOne Ajax Discussion)

At 10:46 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: I haven't seen your work, so I can't talk intelligently about it... I would agree though that if DWR is going to make HTTP calls to execute Actions (a suggestion I might add that I made about two months ago to Joe with regard to how

Re: [action1] Snapshot of 1.3.5 available

orward looked like it was mishandling modules. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try som

Re: XWork 2, JDK 1.5

as a lot of uncommitted changes, it would probably make sense to let him commit them before migrating, if the migration is to go ahead. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even

Re: [action2] Build broken

xwork cvs more that one day. The following is what i got printed to console when doing a When I looked earlier today, the newest xwork-1.2 was from 15-May; it has been updated since then, but from the dates of other SNAPSHOTs there, there's nothing suggesting that it's automatic

Various Module bugs in Struts 1.3.x (Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality)

At 1:07 PM -0500 5/16/06, Joe Germuska wrote: I've uncovered a couple of things in porting an old Struts 1.1 application to 1.3; I know they probably need to go in Jira, but I wanted to get a little discussion about them before filing them. Actually, now I think i'll send them separ

Bug/change in interpretation of ActionMapping with CRP (Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality)

At 1:07 PM -0500 5/16/06, Joe Germuska wrote: I've uncovered a couple of things in porting an old Struts 1.1 application to 1.3; I know they probably need to go in Jira, but I wanted to get a little discussion about them before filing them. Actually, now I think i'll send them separ

Release Process thoughts (Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality)

ting an old Struts 1.1 application to 1.3; I know they probably need to go in Jira, but I wanted to get a little discussion about them before filing them. Actually, now I think i'll send them separately with different subject lines to help manage the various conversations that might arise.

[OT] reading resources from nested JARs (Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality)

n formal documentation of this issue? We've always just worked around it. The bottom line, it is better to hide DTDs in the JAR, but in case it does not work a readily available HOW-TO should be provided. Indeed. -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "Yo

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

y, but since by default most people wouldn't have removed the chain-config.xml from the ZIP, I think it's easier to say "change this in web.xml" than "unpack this thing from web.xml and then edit it." Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com

Re: SAF2 Support for Java 1.4

n compatibility. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

At 11:21 AM -0700 5/10/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 5/10/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This seems like the smallest of things, but the distribution includes struts-core-1.3.4.jar and not struts-action-1.3.4.jar. I thought we'd decided to change that? The upgrade note

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

I've had 1.3 based code in production for months, so I'm GA on the code -- as for whether the above is an important packaging problem or just something that needs to be updated in docs, I'll defer. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You reall

Re: Messages Round II (was Leveraging known constructs (was Public API first draft))

What about a String constant representing a global warning, and then only warn(String fieldName, String key) warn(String fieldName, String key, Object...) i.e. warn(GLOBAL, "warnings.foo", 42); Joe At 12:26 PM -0700 5/5/06, Bob Lee wrote: There's some potential overloading

Re: [action2] Leveraging known constructs (was Public API first draft)

e, it just breaks down. If I missed something, excuse me... Joe And of course we'd also provide the simpler JSP messages tags to make that even easier. In fact, users of the UI tags won't ever have to display messages, as they are generally handled by the component templates. Th

Re: SAF 1.3.x and legacy RequestProcessor

At 3:03 PM +0100 5/5/06, Niall Pemberton wrote: On 5/5/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Its probably academic, but since CRP extends RP then it seems incorrect to deprecate the whole class with a view to removing in the future. Wouldn't it be more correct to dep

Re: SAF 1.3.x and legacy RequestProcessor

ds are superceded by commands; it's just the set-up (and possibly teardown?) that are still new enough that it's hard to know. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if yo

Re: [action2] Public API first draft

, but I've found it pretty handy. It's also a bigger model change from both Struts and Webwork than may be appropriate at this time. In short, I think it's nice to have a "warning" level if we can work out a clean way to support it. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: SAF 1.3.x and legacy RequestProcessor

chain non-functional. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try somethin

Re: Action 1 and 2 as separate projects? (was This has gone too far.)

out there who have things they want to contribute to Struts 1.3, but they just aren't because of some uncertainty about the future? I don't understand this (or maybe I don't believe it), but if it's true, please don't be shy. Step up and do what you want to do, discuss

Re: [action2] Action Next++ (Ti Phase 2)

it up later. I'm inclined to agree with Bob here. At this point, I think that the first release of SAF2 should be taking the stage as more than just WebWork 2.x with renamed packages. It doesn't need to be radically different, but it should be more than that. Joe

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

s belongs in Struts projects (and the same for tiles-velocity probably, although I don't really know that code.) Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out,

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

ur first release, so your help will be big. I haven't yet had a chance to look at this myself. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Tr

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

#x27;s the status/plan/etc? This is something I've just started thinking about in the last couple of weeks, but don't want to reinvent the wheel... Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something ne

RE: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

quite seen how it handles re-displaying values in the case of conversion errors, and I've run out of time to trace through the code to figure it out for myself at the moment. Joe Hermod -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Co

Re: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

othing else, Hermod, could you check issues.apache.org for any possibly existing ticket, and if you don't find one, create one? It would be better to have this discussion in the bug tracker so that it is archived in conjunction with the actual enhancement request. Joe At 11:30 PM +0200

JS Libraries (was Re: [WebWork2] TODO)

s very conservative about that, but it may do us well to challenge that philosophy. Still, having roots in that philosophy, again my inclination is to try to be more library agnostic. Can that work? Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can

Re: [WebWork2] TODO

At 9:59 AM -0500 3/27/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: On Mon, March 27, 2006 9:22 am, Joe Germuska said: I wonder if there's a way to generalize an "API" out of these so that we are less bound to an implementation. Certainly, a date picker or rich text field which ultimate

Re: [WebWork2] TODO

ield which ultimately just ends up setting a value of a single form field should be not too hard to generalize, although I haven't looked at all the models for integrating JS widgets into a page neatly. I guess there are also issues of triggering the widgets, etc. Hope this helps

Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised*

t;SAF" for purely aesthetic reasons, but not to the point where I'd make a fuss. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out,

Re: WebWork renaming strategy

the 2s but I would love for people to kick around some alternatives first. Joe Frank Don Brown wrote: I've renamed the WebWork packages, and both the code compiles and all tests pass correctly. However, as I start with the greater renaming task, I thought I'd propose a strategy a

Re: Maven 2 repository containing Action 1.3?

s Nico's extrapolation, but in any case, I just don't think it's necessary to have that extra layer in there. Not something I feel extremely strongly about, but since two other folks brought it up, I figured I'd chime in. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog

Applying Annotations to Struts (Re: [OT] What can I do?)

ystems to Java 5, and I doubt he's the most conservative one out there. (well... maybe :) naah.) Spring, at least, supports Annotations in pre-Java-5, so there is an example that could be mined. I don't know how much extra effort it takes, but I thought I'd throw it o

Re: [Proposal] Consolidate extras, EL, taglibs, and faces under 'action' (was Maven groupId and svn repo structure)

If we're going to consolidate, why not go whole hog and have a single artifact? I agree that past experience and the future of action2 suggest that there's not going to be a lot of activity in various subprojects independent of an individual release. Joe At 10:48 AM -0800 3/

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

specific security concerns which merited a release of something likely to be GA sooner than we could expect 1.3.x to reach that level. Joe Michael J wrote: You think that 1.3 is a revolution? Or a leap so giant that current 1.2.x users may not be able to make? Afaik, 1.3 can be used without knowing

Re: [Proposal] Switch to JIRA

re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-742 -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new.&quo

RE: Next steps for Action 1.3.1 (was Re: Reasons for 1.3 release)

in further debates if there were any more points raised beyond our mutual opinions. I think by far the bigger issue is that not enough people have looked closely at the code enough for a strong discussion to be held. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com &quo

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

focus is on coding request handling paths as opposed to wiring together components and events (as in Shale). Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

u couldn't possibly use servlet filters instead of the chain without at least requiring those upgrading to Struts 1.3 to learn the new way to configure their web.xml. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying s

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

thers will never bother to touch Struts 1.3 and will have already started using WebWork. There is a broad spectrum of users out there. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

If people agree with some of the recent concerns about the API, like the naming and responsibility of the ActionContext class, then they could vote to mark the release merely Alpha -- but that doesn't mean there shouldn't be a release. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http:/

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

't think we necessarily have to worry that much about this potential overlap. That said, I wouldn't veto a change if other committers agree strongly with Paul. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by tr

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

At 10:24 AM -0800 2/13/06, Don Brown wrote: +1 Lets just get something out the door already :) +1 and amen -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be f

Re: Validation Security Hole?

e globally turned it off until any action mappings have that attribute set.. An additional, independent parameter to turn it off just seems like it will be confusing. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying s

Re: [VOTE] Accept WebWork 2 Merger Incubator Proposal

arguments for either way. For example, when referring to a musical group whose name isn't plural, there are different conventions in the US and the UK. Like this current headline from nme.com: "Elbow join Lancastrian super-gig" In the States, it would probably be "Elbow joi

Re: [VOTE] Accept WebWork 2 Merger Incubator Proposal

At 8:16 PM -0800 1/24/06, Don Brown wrote: = PROJECT PROPOSAL = WebWork 2: A Java web application development framework A proposal to merge the WebWork 2 community and codebase into the Apache Struts project. The new codebase is slated to become Struts Action 2. +1 -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >