[expert] Kde 2.1 and Kde 2.x

2001-03-24 Thread David Boles
I know that this is not the KDE list but I have gotten no responce from them and since L-M must have someone in charge of KDE for L-M I thought that I would ask here. Please, if you don't know the answer, try point me to the person who does. Thanks There was a thread here shortly after KDE 2.1 wa

[expert] KDE 2.1 installation woes

2001-03-19 Thread Neal Lippman
I am having trouble getting KDE 2.1 installed. My system is a baseline MDK 7.2 install, upgraded to 2.4.2 kernel which I compiled. I downloaded the Mandrake KDE 2.1 rpms from ftp.sourceforge.net, and have the following rpms in my kde-2.1 directory: arts-2.1-2mdk.i586.rpm kdeadmin-2.1-1mdk.i58

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1

2001-03-19 Thread Leopold Palomo
Ok, thank's it was a dummy thing!!! Best regards. Leo Digital Wokan wrote: > Set "Max number of "Quick Start" entries to 0. > You'll find it in Control Center -> LookNFeel -> Panel -> Menus > > Leopold Palomo wrote: > > Hi, > > I have upgraded my LM 7.2 to the kde 2.1 and I suffer a curious

Re: [expert] Kde 2.1 and Kde 2.x

2001-03-18 Thread Clint Olson
>From what I've been hearing, you might try XFCE :) --snip- > Other wise I need to setup a new desktop manager. I miss will miss > KDE. ---snip- Clint Olson CO-n-Co. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

[expert] Kde 2.1 and Kde 2.x

2001-03-18 Thread David Boles
There was a thread here shortly after KDE 2.1 was released about what some users considered a bug with KDE and Netscape and others considered a feature. < putting on FLAME suit now > It is not possible from OUTSIDE of Netscape to open Netscape and then, like the Alt-N feature INSIDE Netscape, o

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1

2001-03-18 Thread Digital Wokan
Set "Max number of "Quick Start" entries to 0. You'll find it in Control Center -> LookNFeel -> Panel -> Menus Leopold Palomo wrote: > Hi, > I have upgraded my LM 7.2 to the kde 2.1 and I suffer a curious thing. > When I run any program from the menu, I have a new entry in the top of > the menu w

[expert] KDE 2.1

2001-03-18 Thread Leopold Palomo
Hi, I have upgraded my LM 7.2 to the kde 2.1 and I suffer a curious thing. When I run any program from the menu, I have a new entry in the top of the menu with the program that I have run. What do I have to do to avoid this? Best regards, Leo -- Leopold Palomo Avellaneda Linux User 152692 Ca

RE: [expert] kde 2.1

2001-03-16 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG SICN
Will try it out. thanks Brian -Original Message- From: Balaji Ramani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] kde 2.1 I assume you are asking about the bookmark toolbar. If so, this is what you do. Go to "

Re: [expert] kde 2.1

2001-03-16 Thread Balaji Ramani
I assume you are asking about the bookmark toolbar. If so, this is what you do. Go to "Edit Bookmarks" Create a new Folder (I call it "Toolbar") Right click on the Folder and choose "Set As Toolbar Folder" Save your bookmarks and you are done. Balaji On Friday 16 March 2001 09:29, you wrot

[expert] kde 2.1

2001-03-16 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG SICN
I have kde 2.1 final installed. All seems fine with one exception. How do I get Konquerors toolbar to show. When I check it to show it, I see where it is barely sticking down beneath the location toolbar. It is only maybe a 1/16 showing though. Brian D. Klar - CVE OTS WPAFB (937) 656-2861 (937)

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 Final : Still 2 apps that won't run fromdesktop applink

2001-03-10 Thread Kelley Terry
pe of thing to do. > > -Original Message - > From: Sujeet Bhatt > To: Mandrake Expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:01:26 -0600 > Subject: Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 Final : Still 2 apps that won't run from desktop > applink > > > On Wednesday 07

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 Final : Still 2 apps that won't run from desktop applink

2001-03-10 Thread David Boles
Expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:01:26 -0600 Subject: Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 Final : Still 2 apps that won't run from desktop applink > On Wednesday 07 March 2001 17:26, George Czerw declaimed unto the faithful: > > Beginning with KDE 2.1 Beta 2, I have 2 applic

[expert] KDE 2.1 Java: JSSE -- critical footnote

2001-03-10 Thread Benjamin Sher
Dear friends: The JSSE message that comes up in the Virtual console in NO way retards or obstructs or affects in any way the performance of the java applet. Thank God! If you UNCHECK the box for "Virtual console" under Settings, Konqueror, Browser, Java, you will be blissfully unaware of this iss

[expert] KDE 2.1 Java: JESSE -- What's that, please?

2001-03-10 Thread Benjamin Sher
Dear friens: The IBM Java Virtual Machine is working flawlessly, so far, in KDE 2.1's Konqueror. As good and as fast as in Netscape 4.76. I have one question, for which I believe there is an answer. But, being a newbie, I think I bet let an expert comment on this and on whether any of us users r

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 help

2001-03-09 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thursday 08 March 2001 07:26 pm, Alan Shoemaker wrote: > Tom Brinkman wrote: > >      That was last Saturday AM, and the system's been up > > since with no problems.  Kmail has no fixed width fonts > > available (but Knode and other KDE apps do [?]), but I've > > seen others report the same fo

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 help

2001-03-08 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Tom Brinkman wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2001 12:47 pm, Neal Lippman wrote: > > Two questions on installing KDE 2.1: > > > > Firstly, I STILL cannot find it in the download sites > > provided on KDE's website. Where are people getting it > > from? > >      Any cooker mirror in the .../unsupported/

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 Final : Still 2 apps that won't run from desktop applink

2001-03-08 Thread Sujeet Bhatt
On Wednesday 07 March 2001 17:26, George Czerw declaimed unto the faithful: > Beginning with KDE 2.1 Beta 2, I have 2 applications that will NOT > launch from any KDE applink or menu entry that I create, and I can't > figure out why they won't launch, because if I enter the identical > command lin

[expert] KDE 2.1 Final : Still 2 apps that won't run from desktop applink

2001-03-08 Thread George Czerw
Beginning with KDE 2.1 Beta 2, I have 2 applications that will NOT launch from any KDE applink or menu entry that I create, and I can't figure out why they won't launch, because if I enter the identical command line from inside a (bash) terminal window WILL launch either application. I had hoped

[expert] KDE 2.1 is missing many i18n packages...

2001-03-08 Thread Alen Salamun
Hi! I just downloaded KDE 2.1! Many i18n packages are missing (Slovenian...). I have used the ones for RedHat 7.0... Why aren't they released also?? Bye, Alen

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 help

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Monday 05 March 2001 12:47 pm, Neal Lippman wrote: > Two questions on installing KDE 2.1: > > Firstly, I STILL cannot find it in the download sites provided on KDE's > website. Where are people getting it from?      Any cooker mirror in the .../unsupported/./kde2.1/ directory.  I d/l'd a

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 help

2001-03-07 Thread Rial Juan
try `rpm -q qt2` qt 1.xx is listed 'qt' in the DB; qt 2.xx is listed 'qt2'. As for where to fond it. Sorry; I don't use KDE; perhaps someone else can help you out on this one. On 2001.03.05 19:47 Neal Lippman wrote: > Two questions on installing KDE 2.1: > > Firstly, I STILL cannot find it in

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 help

2001-03-07 Thread Michael O'Henly
On Monday 05 March 2001 10:47, Neal Lippman wrote: > Two questions on installing KDE 2.1: > Firstly, I STILL cannot find it in the download sites provided on KDE's > website. Where are people getting it from? ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/latest/distribution/rpm/Mandrake/7.2/i586/ > Secondl

[expert] KDE 2.1 help

2001-03-06 Thread Neal Lippman
Two questions on installing KDE 2.1: Firstly, I STILL cannot find it in the download sites provided on KDE's website. Where are people getting it from? Secondly, the KDE web site states that qt-2.2.4 is required, but it will probably work with qt-2.2.3. On my system, `rpm -q qt` tells me I hav

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday 04 March 2001 09:50 am, Collins Richey wrote: > > run 'rpm --rebuilddb' and 'update-menus -v' > > Yep, that worked, at least partially. The KDE panel now has the > appropriate icons. > > Two further questions: > > 1. Where would I RTFM to know that this was needed? 'apropos

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Vic
Another reason I love linux, I can have my point and click environment, and my commandline too. On Sunday 04 March 2001 06:55 am, Mark Weaver wrote: > you use gFTP to grab'em from the mirror then put them in their own dir > on your hard drive, when they're all done open a terminal window and

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Michael O'Henly
Update-menus normally takes only a minute or so to run. What you want to do is hit after it _appears_ to hang. I don't know why this is (sigh...) M. On Sunday 04 March 2001 07:50, Collins Richey wrote: > On Sunday 04 March 2001 06:09, you wrote: > > On Saturday 03 March 2001 09:19 pm, Collins

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Collins Richey
On Sunday 04 March 2001 06:09, you wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2001 09:19 pm, Collins Richey wrote: > > >create a directory to d/l the rpms to, then paste the URL with > > > *.rpms added into nt (Webdownloader) or your favorite other. eg, > > > ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake-de

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Christopher Molnar
On Sunday 04 March 2001 08:02, Mark Weaver wrote: > > Ya know...it just doesn't feel right without Chris. Anyone know how to > get in touch with him? I'm still here and reading the lists. If anyone has a question, just ask. Just a change in email addresses ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -Chris -- New En

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Tom Badran
I get this alot, all you have to do normally is log out and log back in -- Microsoft is not the answer, its the question. And the answer is no. www.badran.co.uk

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Saturday 03 March 2001 09:19 pm, Collins Richey wrote: > >create a directory to d/l the rpms to, then paste the URL with > > *.rpms added into nt (Webdownloader) or your favorite other. eg, > > ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake-devel/unsupported/i586/kde > >-2.1 /*.rpm When the

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Pedro Del Medico
On Sat Mar 03 2001 23:19, You wrote: > > 4. The panel is present, but most of the icons have the gearwheel (generic > icon) instead of the expected icon. > try doing as root and from console: rpm -i --rebuilddb update-menus -v -- Atentamente, Pedro Del Medico P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux User #14

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Mark Weaver
Marc Siegel wrote: > > > KDE 2.1 final binary RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 are now in the > > mandrake-devel/unsupported/KDE-2.1 directory on the mirrors. > > > > I wish I knew who to give credit to for this work ... > > > > I am glad they are in a subdirectory of their own; it makes updating > > so eas

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-04 Thread Mark Weaver
Ron Stodden wrote: > > Marc Siegel wrote: > > > > > KDE 2.1 final binary RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 are now in the > > > mandrake-devel/unsupported/KDE-2.1 directory on the mirrors. > > > > > > I wish I knew who to give credit to for this work ... > > > > > > I am glad they are in a subdirectory of th

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-03 Thread Collins Richey
On Saturday 03 March 2001 11:26, you wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2001 11:58 am, Marc Siegel wrote: > > > KDE 2.1 final binary RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 are now in the > > > mandrake-devel/unsupported/KDE-2.1 directory on the mirrors. > > > I wish I knew who to give credit to for this work ... > > >

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-03 Thread Ron Stodden
Marc Siegel wrote: > > > KDE 2.1 final binary RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 are now in the > > mandrake-devel/unsupported/KDE-2.1 directory on the mirrors. > > > > I wish I knew who to give credit to for this work ... > > > > I am glad they are in a subdirectory of their own; it makes updating > > so eas

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-03 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Saturday 03 March 2001 11:58 am, Marc Siegel wrote: > > KDE 2.1 final binary RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 are now in the > > mandrake-devel/unsupported/KDE-2.1 directory on the mirrors. > > I wish I knew who to give credit to for this work ... > > I am glad they are in a subdirectory of their own; it

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-03 Thread Marc Siegel
> KDE 2.1 final binary RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 are now in the > mandrake-devel/unsupported/KDE-2.1 directory on the mirrors. > > I wish I knew who to give credit to for this work ... > > I am glad they are in a subdirectory of their own; it makes updating > so easy. How does this make updating eas

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-03 Thread Ron Stodden
Alan Shoemaker wrote: > Ron/everybodyyou can find the below announcement in a > README file on the KDE ftp site at: > > >http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/rpm/Mandrake/7.2/ No go. This space is empty. > The KDE packages for Linux-Mandrake 7.2 are still

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-03 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Ron Stodden wrote: > KDE 2.1 final in binary form for the various distributions > was promised on the KDE site by Monday February 26. > > It is now 3.5 hours into Tuesday GMT and there is no sign > of the KDE 2.1 final update to Mandrake 7.2. > > Where is it? What is happening? When and where

[expert] kde 2.1

2001-03-02 Thread Tom Badran
Anyone got RPMS of kde 2.1 for mandrake 7.2. I have the beta 2 installed (from muo) but really need some of the fixes for 2.1 final. Also, does anyone have any experience with upgrading glibc to 2.2, like pitfalls / best way of doing it, or does it just break everything. -- Microsoft is not th

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-02 Thread Woody Green
Ron Stodden wrote: > > KDE 2.1 final in binary form for the various distributions was > promised on the KDE site by Monday February 26. > > It is now 3.5 hours into Tuesday GMT and there is no sign of the KDE > 2.1 final update to Mandrake 7.2. > > Where is it? What is happening? When and w

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-02 Thread Larry Marshall
> I completely understand what you're saying, but unless the creators of > Netscape and those responsible for maintaining and changing it decide to > write it to do the things being suggested in this thread it's not going Oh...you're just saying "That's the way it is, deal with it." Well, you'r

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-01 Thread David E. Fox
On Tuesday 27 February 2001 08:41, Cecil Watson wrote: > http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/rpm/M >andrake/7.2/ I'm there now - it's empty :( -- David E. Fox

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-03-01 Thread Mark Weaver
Larry Marshall wrote: > > > While I understand this to be a desire of many who use the browsers in > > this manner, I don't understand "why" this is. The browser was never > > designed to do such a thing. Why would one want it to? Why not just kill > > Mark...look at what Konquerer is doing and

Re: Reloading browsers [Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final]

2001-03-01 Thread Ron Heron
No kidding, reminds me of the NT "user adjustment" that required a reboot every 45 days. Sheeez, the only adjustment a user should have to make, is to upgrade periodically as the developers squish bugs (ie this one). --- Pierre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark, > > [At the risk of start

[expert] KDE 2.1 final...nice, RPM-4.0?

2001-03-01 Thread Praedor Tempus
Last night I finally completed the compilation and installation of kde2.1-1mdk src rpms. So far, all is working superbly. Very nice. One minor detail...when one right-clicks on the panel and gets the little menu which has one entry for "Settings". Selecting this item (with the intent of ch

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-28 Thread Larry Marshall
> While I understand this to be a desire of many who use the browsers in > this manner, I don't understand "why" this is. The browser was never > designed to do such a thing. Why would one want it to? Why not just kill Mark...look at what Konquerer is doing and think about the question you just

Re: Reloading browsers [Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final]

2001-02-28 Thread Mark Weaver
Pierre Fortin wrote: > > Mark, > > [At the risk of starting a thread that won't die...] > > With all due respect, your comments really puzzle me... especially in a Linux > forum... Extending your argument, why was it ever necessary to make Linux so > reliable? Users could just "dump and resta

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-28 Thread Mark Weaver
Feb 2001, Ron Stodden wrote: > > > > > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:33:42 +1100 > > > From: Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: Mandrake Expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [expert] KDE 2.1 final &

[expert] KDE 2.1 final and rpm-4.0

2001-02-28 Thread Praedor Tempus
I am in the final portion of rebuilding kde-2.1-1mdk src rpms for my Mandrake 7.2 (ish) system. I am doing this after upgrading to glibc-2.2. All is going well, so far as compiling and installing goes (we'll see after trying to restart the whole shebang afterward). I also downloaded, built,

Reloading browsers [Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final]

2001-02-28 Thread Pierre Fortin
Mark, [At the risk of starting a thread that won't die...] With all due respect, your comments really puzzle me... especially in a Linux forum... Extending your argument, why was it ever necessary to make Linux so reliable? Users could just "dump and restart" it too... Just as I hate reboots,

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-28 Thread Bill Barnes
den wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:33:42 +1100 > > From: Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: Mandrake Expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: [expert] KDE 2.1 final > > > > KDE 2.1 final in binary form fo

RE: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-28 Thread Mark Weaver
7 Feb 2001 13:33:08 -0800 (PST) > From: Bill Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [expert] KDE 2.1 final > > > Well, that's because the Linux community runs in > Sensitivity Severity Mode (SSM). That is, the

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-28 Thread Mark Weaver
From: Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Mandrake Expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [expert] KDE 2.1 final > > KDE 2.1 final in binary form for the various distributions was > promised on the KDE site by Monday February 26. > > It

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-27 Thread Ron Stodden
Cecil Watson wrote: > > >http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/rpm/Mandrake/7.2/ Huh? 7.2/i586/ is an empty directory. Nothing there. -- Regards, Ron. [au]

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-27 Thread Marc Siegel
ctories are _empty_ > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cecil Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:41 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final > > > > http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pu

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-27 Thread Digital Wokan
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final > > http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/rpm/Ma > ndrake/7.2/ > > Ron Stodden wrote: > > > KDE 2.1 final in binary form for the vario

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-27 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 13:33 -0800, Bill Barnes wrote: > > Well, that's because the Linux community runs in > Sensitivity Severity Mode (SSM). That is, the more > desperate your needs the more likely a link or a > package will be broken. You may not know it because it reaches way back to when

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-27 Thread Kelley Terry
ere is nothing under either directory > > SRPMS and i586 directories are _empty_ > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cecil Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:41 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:

RE: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-27 Thread Bill Barnes
acketta,Ronald J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BUM link! > > there is nothing under either directory > SRPMS and i586 directories are _empty_ > > > -Original Message- > From: Cecil Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 20

RE: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-27 Thread Yacketta,Ronald J
BUM link! there is nothing under either directory SRPMS and i586 directories are _empty_ -Original Message- From: Cecil Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pub

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-27 Thread Cecil Watson
http://ftp.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/rpm/Mandrake/7.2/ Ron Stodden wrote: > KDE 2.1 final in binary form for the various distributions was > promised on the KDE site by Monday February 26. > > It is now 3.5 hours into Tuesday GMT and there is no sign of the KDE

[expert] KDE 2.1???

2001-02-27 Thread Balaji Ramani
Any idea when KDE 2.1 will be packaged and available for 7.2? I see that it is already available for cooker. Thanks, Balaji

[expert] KDE 2.1 final

2001-02-26 Thread Ron Stodden
KDE 2.1 final in binary form for the various distributions was promised on the KDE site by Monday February 26. It is now 3.5 hours into Tuesday GMT and there is no sign of the KDE 2.1 final update to Mandrake 7.2. Where is it? What is happening? When and where will it appear? -- Regards,

[expert] KDE 2.1-0.20010210

2001-02-15 Thread Ron Heron
Hi everyone, I just noticed that there is another beta kde2 on cookerwith the following packages (not all are as new as the last Chris's packages): ncftp ...l/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS > ls kde* kde1-compat-1.1.2-8mdk.i586.rpm kde1-compat-devel-1.1

FW: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk ***Chris Molnar can you please help***

2001-02-06 Thread Milnes Terry SSgt 52LSS/LGLOE
rom: Digital Wokan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk The only package that should have required doing the-nodeps to it was kdebase. Everything else should have been updatable. The problem may

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-05 Thread Ron Stodden
Digital Wokan wrote: > > If you download jdk-1_2_2_007-linux-i386.tar.gz from java.sun.com, > you'll find that untar/gz'ing them extracts the files into a directory > named jdk1.2.2, not jdk-sun1.2.2. If you download and install jdk-sun-1.2.2-3mdk.i586.rpm, which is the procedure given by Chri

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-05 Thread Digital Wokan
I had it running on one of my other machines back in the Kleopatra beta > version. > > NeoFax > > -Original Message- > From: Digital Wokan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:Re

RE: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-05 Thread Milnes Terry SSgt 52LSS/LGLOE
n I had it running on one of my other machines back in the Kleopatra beta version. NeoFax -Original Message- From: Digital Wokan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk If you download jdk

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-05 Thread Digital Wokan
If you download jdk-1_2_2_007-linux-i386.tar.gz from java.sun.com, you'll find that untar/gz'ing them extracts the files into a directory named jdk1.2.2, not jdk-sun1.2.2. Though I suppose there's nothing to stop you from renaming the directory since you have to manually tell Konqueror where it i

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-05 Thread Digital Wokan
Not your fault Sun is riddled full of jacka**es who don't see the open spreading of what they're giving away as a good thing. Christopher Molnar wrote: > Folks, due to a license issue I needed to move off of the Mandrake mirrors. > But, you will find the package on any kde mirror site in the beta

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-05 Thread Christopher Molnar
; Subject: Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk > > It should be in the directory right above where the kde2.1b2s are. > -s > > On Monday 05 February 2001 06:01 am, you wrote: > > I d/l'ed the unsupported rpms from a ftp mirror site. In the readme it > > states that if you

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-05 Thread Ron Stodden
Digital Wokan wrote: > > After installing it, go into Konqueror's configuration and put the > following in for the location of java on the Java tab: > /usr/jdk1.2.2/bin/java No. Should not it be: /usr/jdk-sun1.2.2/bin/java ? -- Regards, Ron. [AU]

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-05 Thread Digital Wokan
Sun has gone through and had all the KDE 2.1 mirrors remove the JDK rpm (because they're "protecting" themselves from something or other). You can download and install the JDK from the following URL... http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/download-linux.html After installing it, go into Konquero

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-04 Thread Zeljko Vukman
I can't get Konqueror work with SUN's java (mandrake rpm from unsuported). No java applets although Konqi says 'loading java applet'. Nothing happens. Any advice? I enabled everything in Konqi (java globaly, java scripts globaly, plugins etc.). Where do you point Konqi to search for java executab

RE: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-04 Thread Milnes Terry SSgt 52LSS/LGLOE
: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk It should be in the directory right above where the kde2.1b2s are. -s On Monday 05 February 2001 06:01 am, you wrote: > I d/l'ed the unsupported rpms from a ftp mirror site. In the readme it > states that if you want java support d/l the jdk-sun rpm in th

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-04 Thread s
It should be in the directory right above where the kde2.1b2s are. -s On Monday 05 February 2001 06:01 am, you wrote: > I d/l'ed the unsupported rpms from a ftp mirror site. In the readme it > states that if you want java support d/l the jdk-sun rpm in the directory. > However, there is no jdk-su

[expert] KDE 2.1 and jdk

2001-02-04 Thread Milnes Terry SSgt 52LSS/LGLOE
I d/l'ed the unsupported rpms from a ftp mirror site. In the readme it states that if you want java support d/l the jdk-sun rpm in the directory. However, there is no jdk-sun rpm. Can anyone help me out with this. Thanks! NeoFax

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 install problem

2001-02-03 Thread Christopher Molnar
Better or another answer: Check your /etc/hosts file and make sure that your machine can talk to itself. On Friday 02 February 2001 15:47, you wrote: > Gary Bond wrote: > > --- "Altoine B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Either you go to a mandrake mirror and download and > > > install the

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 install problem

2001-02-03 Thread Altoine B.
> > > > To manually start and stop your service use these > > two commands: > > Thanks Al > > I tried the xfs stop but it is an invalid switch, > however your little trick worked just great. My kde > 2.1 is running fine now and it sure is nice. How do I > continue to upgrade kde, can I use mand

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 install problem

2001-02-03 Thread Gary Bond
--- "Altoine B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You have to manually start and stop xfs. But if you > want a quick hack. > Open up XF86Config-4 with your favorite editor and > go to the line > pointing to your font path. unmark by putting # in > front of the FontPath > unix/:-1 like this > > #

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 install problem

2001-02-02 Thread Altoine B.
Gary Bond wrote: > > --- "Altoine B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Either you go to a mandrake mirror and download and > > install the package > > or you can search www.rpmfind.net for the package > > and download it that > > way. These are the choices. I hope that this is > > helpful? > > > >

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 install problem

2001-02-02 Thread Gary Bond
--- "Altoine B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Either you go to a mandrake mirror and download and > install the package > or you can search www.rpmfind.net for the package > and download it that > way. These are the choices. I hope that this is > helpful? > > Cheers > -- Al > Thanks Al Ifound t

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 install problem

2001-02-02 Thread Altoine B.
Gary Bond wrote: > > I've followed the directions from Mark Weaver on the > themes subject. I'm stuck at a certain point. I get a > dependency error which says "M4 is needed by autoconf > 2.13-6mdk". What do I do now? > > __ > Get personalized emai

[expert] KDE 2.1 install problem

2001-02-02 Thread Gary Bond
I've followed the directions from Mark Weaver on the themes subject. I'm stuck at a certain point. I get a dependency error which says "M4 is needed by autoconf 2.13-6mdk". What do I do now? __ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - onl

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 CVS for 20010118

2001-01-19 Thread salane
While trying to learn how to make and rpm i had a fault with while rpm -bc kdebase-2.1-.20010119 the error occurs at the end of a long string that starts off with g++ -o3 DNDEBUG. and ends with -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc /usr/bin/ld: Cannot find -lssl This problem also occured when trying to --

[expert] KDE 2.1 CVS for 20010118

2001-01-18 Thread Christopher Molnar
Hello, I have just put the kde rpm's for 2001-01-18 into the Mandrake-devel/unsupported/i586/kde2.1 directory on any of the Mandrake cooker mirrors. You will find a list of these mirrors on http://www.linux-mandrake.com/cooker . These RPM's are built on a clean 7.2 machine and are designed f

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 Beta - Icons

2001-01-18 Thread Zeljko Vukman
In console type: kbuildsycoca If it doesn't work, delete /.kde/share/applnk directory, and restart your kde session. Regards, On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:47:50 -0800 (PST), Ron Heron said: > Hey all, > What is the command to fix the icons in the tray? update-menu works great > for the menu i

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 20010115 - observed problem & solution

2001-01-18 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 18 January 2001 12:51, Andrew George wrote: > > 1. As root, open /usr/lib/menu/ksysctrl > > 2. Change 'needs="x11"' to '"needs="kde"' > > 3. save > > 4. run update-menus, or use the graphical interface menudrake > > 5. enjoy! > Hmm, I se

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 CVS 20010115 RPM's Available

2001-01-18 Thread Ron Heron
Have you fixed the /etc/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 file by adding /usr/bin/kdmdesktop at the end? That will enable X to read the kdmrc file. I fixed mine before the upgrade, and all is well with KDM. Also, my appologies to the "quoting monitors" but I thought it necessary to include the entire thread for

[expert] KDE 2.1 Beta - Icons

2001-01-18 Thread Ron Heron
Hey all, What is the command to fix the icons in the tray? update-menu works great for the menu items, but all my icons are broken since the upgrade. Thanks, Ron __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mai

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 20010115 - observed problem & solution

2001-01-18 Thread Andrew George
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:17, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > 1. As root, open /usr/lib/menu/ksysctrl > 2. Change 'needs="x11"' to '"needs="kde"' > 3. save > 4. run update-menus, or use the graphical interface menudrake > 5. enjoy! > > Regards, > > Michel Salim Hmm,

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 20010115 - observed problem & solution

2001-01-18 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 1. As root, open /usr/lib/menu/ksysctrl 2. Change 'needs="x11"' to '"needs="kde"' 3. save 4. run update-menus, or use the graphical interface menudrake 5. enjoy! Regards, Michel Salim On Thursday 18 January 2001 03:53, you wrote: > How do you edit

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 CVS 20010115 RPM's Available

2001-01-17 Thread Praedor Tempus
I found that too (default, kde, failsafe) and in my case, default was Gnome, kde would start failsafe, and failsafe would start failsafe. I looked as my new .Xclients and it had "exec gnome-session" in it so I changed it to "exec startkde" and now all is proper with the world. One BIG thing

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 20010115 - observed problem & solution

2001-01-17 Thread salane
How do you edit it to need KDE. explain On Wednesday 17 January 2001 10:08 am, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > Been playing with the new KDE 2.1 pre-beta 2 packages and I have observed > the following peculiarity: ksysctrl is wrongly defined in > /

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 CVS 20010115 RPM's Available

2001-01-17 Thread Zeljko Vukman
I also experienced kdm problem during compilation from CVS. Kdm wont compile on Mandrake 7.2. And I have had this problem for last two months. I would really like to know how Chris managed to compile kdm on Mandrake 7.2. Some KDE developers told me that it is Mandrake related problem (I don't bel

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 CVS 20010115 RPM's Available

2001-01-17 Thread ageorge
The only dependancy problem I noticed had to do with the fact that ARTS is now a seperate package - everything else went in OK... I did notice the KDM problem (only KDE, default and failsafe) but havn't had time to play with it (I use KDE so it isn't that critical to me) Andrew Quoting Mark

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 CVS 20010115 RPM's Available

2001-01-17 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Wednesday 17 January 2001 05:37 pm, Mark Belanger wrote: > Christopher Molnar wrote: > > I have just uploaded RPM's for KDE 2.1 CVS as of 2001-01-15. These > Has anyone had kdm troubles with these packages? > Since installing them (on 2 different machines), I have > some oddities. > 1. Resta

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 CVS 20010115 RPM's Available

2001-01-17 Thread Mark Weaver
Hi Mark, I've been getting some dependency problems when I run the --test to see if they're going to install. They seem strange cause I didn't get these dependency issues from the two previous upgrades, 2.0.1 and 2.1beta1 using Chris's packages. At present I'm waiting to hear from Chris as to whe

Re: [expert] KDE 2.1 CVS 20010115 RPM's Available

2001-01-17 Thread salane
I've got the same problem on cooker I just planned to wait until new rpms to fix. Must be a common problem though. On Wednesday 17 January 2001 06:37 pm, you wrote: > Christopher Molnar wrote: > > I have just uploaded RPM's for KDE 2.1 CVS as of 2001-01-15. These RPM's > > are available on any

  1   2   >