Alexander Hansen wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
Do we have the skilled-person-hours to pull it off, though?
We have a couple of more important things to do:
For example, accept the texlive package and make a system-tex package,
so that the tetex mess can
In Fink FAQ#5.10 I'm tired of typing my password into sudo again and
again. Is there a way around this? it is said to put the line
username ALL = NOPASSWD: ALL
into the sudoers file. This was correct up to and including Panther, but
has not worked since Tiger (= MacOSX 10.4). The right syntax
Robert Wyatt wrote:
The auto-logs are showing that no cvs changes after moose was submitted
have been picked up, so changes to kdesvn-kde4 (-mac and -x11), scilab,
libtelepathy and telepathy-missioncontrol are not reflected on the mirrors.
Yes, the rsync mirrors don't currently sync, they
Sjors Gielen wrote:
Hey Finkers,
I didn't know which mailing list this mail was supposed to be sent to,
so please respond on the right one. Also, don't be alarmed if my next
e-mail comes from mailingl...@dazjorz.com instead of
dazj...@dazjorz.com, I'm subscribed there but this was more
Robert Wyatt wrote:
I was looking for Jack Howarth's change to gcc44.info to use gcc 4.4.1
in the package database but don't find it. Here's the CVS log:
http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc44.info
Does a machine somewhere need kicking or is
Jack, why do you send all that html crap to the list? No wonder your
message took five days to arrive.
In the meantime you'll probably have got drm's newer version of
itcl-x86_64.info, which has
Source: mirror:sourceforge:fink/incrtcl-20071231cvs.tgz
instead of the older
Source:
Chupacerveza wrote:
I have a best practices question: if all I'm doing is updating the name
of the maintainer and some usage notes, should I bump the revision number?
thanks,
Yes. Anything that changes the contents of the *.deb file needs a new rev.
--
Martin
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
I'm not seeing how this idea _wouldn't_ result in non-identical .deb
files if we build on two otherwise identical setups: you on a
case-insensitive filesystem and me on a case-sensitive file system. We
_should_ be able to build the package on either, and install on
In the new Xcode-3.1.3, Apple made the *.la files in /usr/X11/lib
reappear. At a first glance, it looks like they did it right: The
library_names line now only contains the install_name and the
version-less name, the latter being guaranteed to be present at compile
time. So there should be no
David R. Morrison wrote:
Yes, I also had an email directly from a user about this. It
mystifies me.
It happens to me, too, when I simply run `fink reinstall tetex-base`. My
first guess is that the final error refers to the message shown below,
which functionally is just a warning, but
David Reiser wrote:
I noticed that message, but tetex-base installed fine for me on April
29 this year when I had to build a new fink on a new machine. Two
dependencies that have changed since then are fontconfig2-dev and
freetype219. For the moment I'm discounting 10.5.7 and xquartz as
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 02 Jun 2009, at 03:03, Martin Costabel wrote:
...
The idea is clear, but preprocessor macros don't work like that.
Really thanks for making so clear msgs !
FInally I understand for sure that cpp works
like tex's \def rather than \edef _ and I'll
feel
Monic Polynomial wrote:
On 02/06/2009, at 12:12, Martin Costabel wrote:
The most difficult thing was to find out how to print the value of a
macro at a given moment. From a diving expedition into the depths of
the
docs, I brought home some macros that give the following small example
qt4-mac-4.5 breaks building of texmacs. I tracked this down to the file
QtGui/qmacdefines_mac.h in /sw/lib/qt4-mac/include/, which did not
exist in qt4-mac-4.4.
That file does some preprocessor macro tricks with the DEBUG symbol (see
below) that a) don't look useful and b) look wrong, like if
Jack Howarth wrote:
I am puzzled that I didn't run into this problem before
in x86_64 fink but under the 10.5 version, I am finding that
aquaterm fails to build due to the usage of the wrong abi...
We did discuss this (on the seed list). Since aquaterm has a maintainer,
I am CCing him.
Kevin Horton wrote:
[]
built-in:0: warning: Mac OS X version 10.5 or later is needed for
use of the new objc abi
Better than placing MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.5 on the command
line (what does this do on 10.4?) would be to simply *remove* the
repeatedly occurring nonsensical
Jerker Delsing wrote:
installed xemacs using fink.
trying to start xemacs gives the following message:
Error: Unresolved inheritance operation
after which xemacs is quitting.
Hard to say anything from this little information. Is there a related
crash log in
Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
[]
If there is no good way, users may have to remove tetex-base
manually before installing texlive.
This is what I ended up doing, too. I got the message
Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies!
Fink isn't sure how to install the above packages safely. You may be
Charles Lepple wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Mario Frasca mariot...@inventati.org wrote:
it complains because some outputs are redirected appending a $REDIR to
the line, where
REDIR=2
(at line 2693)
The difference between the two versions is that they are two different
versions:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
I've updated the revised paraview(-mpi) package on...
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=1747995group_id=17203atid=414256
to the latest 3.4.0 release using the Fedora 11 patches for building
against qt 4.5.1. The paraview-3.4.0-1000 packaging
Alexander Hansen wrote:
Monic Polynomial wrote:
[]
gunzip -c ../openmcu_2.2.1-1.diff.gz | sed -e '0,/@DPATCH@/d' -e
'\Xdebian/controlX,$d' -e 's,^[+],,' | patch -p1
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
patching file debian/patches/00list
patch: malformed patch at line 4:
Monic Polynomial wrote:
(detected via Todai’s build logs)
amiwm-0.20pl48-2 fails to build on Intel OS 10.5.6
$ fink -V | head -n 2
Package manager version: 0.29.2
Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Apr 21 06:40:03 2009, 10.5,
i386
$ which flex
/usr/bin/flex
$ flex
Monic Polynomial wrote:
(detected by Todai’s build logs)
mtools-4.0.1-1 fails to build on Intel OS 10.5.6.
[]
gcc -L/sw/lib floppyd.o -o floppyd -L/usr/X11/lib -R/usr/X11/lib -
lSM -lICE -lX11
Undefined symbols:
_XauFileName, referenced from:
_alarm_signal in floppyd.o
Monic Polynomial wrote:
(detected via Todai’s build logs)
boost1.32.python-1.32.0-1012 fails to build on Intel OS 10.5.6.
$ fink -V | head -n 2
Package manager version: 0.29.2
Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Apr 21 06:40:03 2009, 10.5, i386
$ fink --build-as-nobody rebuild
Jack Howarth wrote:
I just noticed that the build structure used by the itcl.info and
itk.info files don't allow building with --build-as-nobody. In that
case, the build fails with errors of the form...
This is one of the main reasons build-as-nobody was invented, namely to
catch bugs like
Alexander Hansen wrote:
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
It's being worked on.
It has not propagated yet to rsync://nte.fr.eu.finkmirrors.net.
Is it normal?
Dominique
Is the current version ( 0.9.8k-3 ) available for you yet?
The rsync mirrors are currently sleeping, since a little
William Scott wrote:
Also, it (the itcl package) actually builds successfully with --build-
as-nobody, and unless I scroll back up on my terminal, I would miss
this:
Installing ./generic/itclIntDecls.h
Installing man pages in /sw/share/man
Installing body.n
...
/bin/sh:
William Scott wrote:
This is strange. Do you have a different make installed? Or a
different fink version?
Same happens with /usr/bin/make when I removed the fink one.
The explanation is simpler (?): When you run first
fink build itcl
and then
fink --build-as-nobody rebuild
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/crypto/finkinfo
In directory fdv4jf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15478
Modified Files:
libmd.info
Added Files:
openssl-0.9.8k.info
Log Message:
Update of openssl.
Also, hopefully correct (and
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
[]
I did try this (maybe wrongly..); didn't do what was expected.
The problem is that this is a perl-based build system, meaning that you
don't really see what is going on (at least I don't). In particular, it
is not clear at which moment and from which files the
Jack Howarth wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages
In directory fdv4jf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30172
Added Files:
gcc44.info
Log Message:
add gcc44 package since gcc 4.4 is branched
[]
Depends: gmp-shlibs (= 4.2.4-1000),
Mihaela Sighireanu wrote:
[]
Param�trage de db44-aes (4.4.20-1004) ...
The following packages must be temporarily removed, but there are no .debs to
restore them from:
make
Exiting with failure.
Yes, this is a (IMHO somewhat annoying) feature where Fink tries to be
overly protective. You
Mihaela Sighireanu wrote:
[]
Param�trage de fink-buildlock-aquaterm-1.0.1-3 (2009.03.25-21.14.27) ...
gzip -dc /sw/src/aquaterm_src.1.0.1.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf -
--no-same-owner --no-same-permissions
[ -r /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics/aquaterm.patch ]
patch -p1
Tobias Krieger wrote:
Hi to all,
(for info: I've send the same message into the wrong fink mailing list)
I'm new to anything related to porting but me and some others would like
to port the opensource CAD programm, written in C++ to Darwin, Leopard,
best with Aqua look :-)
Koen van der Drift wrote:
[]
~/Desktop$ mitobank.pl 6681 log.txt
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /System/
Library/Perl/5.8.8/darwin-thread-multi-2level/Scalar/Util.pm line 30.
This is strange. I don't have Scalar/Util.pm in that directory. On my
system I have
Koen van der Drift wrote:
[]
Thanks, Dan. How can I find out if -install_name was set correctly? Is
there a way to fix this with a patch or do I need to contact the
upstream developers? The package did switch from using make to cmake,
could that be related to it?
Use, for example, the cmake
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
When I run xmgrace from an x term my X11 crashes and I get
the message
The application X11 quit unexpectedly
Mac OS X and other applications are not affected
The crash log will tell more. If it talks about division by zero, this
would be related to the recent
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
In file included from Src/dssprtd.c:5:
Include/dsgvars.h:15: error: initializer element is not constant
error: command '/usr/bin/cc' failed with exit status 1
[]
These failure didn't stop the build from proceeding to the end and
generating a .deb, though.
Yes, I
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
The following package will be installed or updated:
cdat
The following 2 additional packages will be installed:
scientificpython-py24 scipy-core-py24
[]
dpkg: considering removing f2py-py24 in favour of scipy-core-py24 ...
dpkg: yes, will remove f2py-py24 in
Asko Kauppi wrote:
[]
Does anyone else have this problem; does the package work nice on
Intel 10.5?
No, not for me; I get the same error.
$ makeinfo --version
makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.11
The package has, in its Makefile, a test about which it says
# For an installed
Asko Kauppi wrote:
A bit premature, that was. Mingw-gcc also needs a fix.
The command 'ulimit -S -s unlimited' causes a problem here.
CompileScript:
#!/bin/sh -ev
ulimit -S -s unlimited
mkdir darwin
cd darwin
../configure %c
make
Now, why is that since if I simply
Martin Costabel wrote:
Windell H. Oskay wrote:
I'm having the same problem as well-- I cannot get past freetype219.
I'm building on a Macbook Pro (intel), with OS 10.5.5. I have
already moved /usr/local to /usr/local.moved , so it's firmly out of
the way-- I have no /usr/local
David R. Morrison wrote:
[]
Most likely, in the older version the filename of the library was
libGLw.1.0.dylib but the install_name was libGLw.1.dylib (with a
symlink put in place to relate the two). Now in the simpler version,
that intermediate step is skipped and both the filename and
Matthias Neeracher wrote:
Hmm, I must have been asleep at the wheel on this matter. Sorry about
that...
On Dec 30, 2008, at 22:14 , Alexander Hansen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Costabel wrote:
The xquartz X11 update packages have switched from
/usr
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
sed: /usr/X11/lib/libfontconfig.la: No such file or directory
snip
You didn't specify your Xcode version. It looks like you've got
3.1.2, from which the .la files were removed. You'll either want to
downgrade to 3.1.1 or install the Xquartz update from
The libtool2 package hardcodes /sw/bin/sed in /sw/bin/libtoolize:251 if
Fink's sed or ssed package are installed at build time. This is bad,
because if sed is absent at runtime, failure happens. See bug-tracker
item 2457835 at https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2457835
If
John Ridgway wrote:
Friends -
I am thinking about tackling (once more) the idea of adding TeXLive to
Fink (unless someone is already working on it -- I haven't been
reading the posts recently);
I am following the mailing lists quite closely, and I haven't seen
anyone declaring a firm
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
It appears that this package misbuilds on Intel Macs (at least on mine
and the one used to build our binary distribution), and that you're
the first one to report it to us. The same behavior occurs for
xmame-0.71.1-1 in current/unstable as well.
The one in
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
With xorg installed, I get during configure :
Package x11 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
[]
Looks the culprit is the line in the PatchScript :
/usr/bin/perl -pi -e 's|libs libglade-2.0|$ fontconfig x11 xext
xrender xinerama xrandr xcursor xfixes
Kevin Horton wrote:
I am trying to update the cadabra package, but a build attempt in
maintainer mode complains:
WARNING: The package cadabra has a preferred BuildDepends on gtkmm2.4-
dev,
but gtkmm2.4-dev is an obsolete package.
But, neither the output of fink info
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
I'm still building on my G4, by the way--I accidentally stopped the
build 24 hours in yesterday, so I had to restart that.
..and all this in order to gain - perhaps - a couple of microseconds of
cputime later on. I am surprised that anyone is still bothering with
Alexander Hansen wrote:
On Oct 25, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Caleb Mattoon wrote:
opengl-py25 does not compile on OS X 10.5. I've included the output
from fink, I think the important line is near the end:
gcc -L/sw/lib -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -L/sw/lib -I/sw/
include
David Reiser wrote:
[]
I've looked at this some more, and I think it's simpler. html-parser
looks to me to be provided by both 5.8.6 and 5.8.8, but html-tree is
provided by neither. Consequently, I think the fix is to delete line
339 of VirtPackage.pm so that html-tree does not appear in
David Reiser wrote:
On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
There is, however, also a real html-tree-pm588 package. Run
fink install html-tree-pm588
and see if this helps.
That at least solves the building problem. Is there a workaround to
force users to install
Alexander Hansen wrote:
I'm sending this to -devel because it's potentially a packaging issue,
too.
The problem is as it says: this version bombs on my G4 when it's
running OS 10.5.5 . This problem does _not_ occur on the same machine
when booted into OS 10.4.11. The failure occurs
David Reiser wrote:
How does fink 'know' what packages are provided?
fink list html-tree gives (10.5.5 ppc):
Information about 7253 packages read in 2 seconds.
html-tree-pm586 3.23-1 Handling information
from HTML syntax trees
p html-tree-pm588
Michal Suchanek wrote:
[]
When I install gqview gtk+2-shlibs is installed but I have to install
gtk+2 for gqview to work.
Shouldn't the shlibs package provide enough configuration for the
shlibs to work?
(gqview:15788): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module
file
Asko Kauppi wrote:
Sorry for the noise. Got this solved by adding #!/bin/sh -ex to the
PatchScript and preceding any $ with backslash.
You could also quote the EOF:
cat Makefile.fink EOF
This prevents this and similar undesirable side effects. From `man bash`
(for word read EOF)
If
Alexander Hansen wrote:
An attempt was made to fix a problem with a prior revision, but now
the current one fails with
/bin/mv /sw/src/fink.build/root-freetype219-2.3.7-6/sw/lib/freetype219/
lib/libfreetype.6*dylib /sw/src/fink.build/root-freetype219-
(Originally sent on 2008/09/20, bounced back permanently by the
fink-devel list because of current sourceforge mailing list troubles)
The libtiff{,-bin,-shlibs} packages are dependencies of very many Fink
packages. It would therefore be nice if they could be fixed.
Currently they build
The xquartz X11 update packages have switched from
/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/fonts.conf for the fontconfig conf file to
/usr/X11/lib/X11/fontconfig/fonts.conf
Don't ask me why, probably because of a general backward comaptibility
is so boring attitude. See the thread from
William G. Scott wrote:
[]
On Sep 18, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I did, though. In consultation with Dan Macks we found the following:
$ type -a xml2-config
xml2-config is /sw/share/xtal/ccp4-6.0.99e/bin/xml2-config
xml2-config is /sw/bin/xml2-config
xml2-config is
William G. Scott wrote:
I just bootstrap-installed fink in a non-/sw directory (and moved /sw
out of the way for safety)
MakeListCache called by fink index does this:
% fink index
Scanning package description files..
MakeListCache:4: no such file or directory: /sw/bin/fink
Peter Dyballa wrote:
[]
Is $exec_prefix set correctly when using the original Fink package?
Yes. Fink sets --prefix=/sw automatically, and exec_prefix is set from
$prefix by configure, if you don't set it explicitly. That is, unless
you fiddle with the tcl stuff. The configure script has the
William G. Scott wrote:
Apparently gmp compiled on my G5 ppc is not compatible with a G4
Yes, this is an old problem. Often it gives bus errors or illegal
instruction errors. The G5 build apparently uses ppc machine
instructions that don't exist on G4.
In principle, gmp has some code to
Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 02.09.2008 um 19:37 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
Also: you didn't quote the whole compiler command.
It's not available in the moment – the *compilation* buffer is used
for other work.
There is one difference: I am using Apple's TclTk. So its -L/sw/lib
switch
Jack Howarth wrote:
In preparing the packaging for an upcoming gcc43-4.3.2-1000
release, I decided to switch the dependencies for cctools to
xcode (= 2.5). However 'fink -m' reports that...
WARNING: The package gcc43 Depends on xcode,
but xcode only allows things to BuildDepend on
Sven de Vries wrote:
Hi,
yes, I had a problem with it a while ago and suggested a patch
which worked for me fine. Given Martin's questions, I tried again a
rebuild with the unpatched file and surprisingly the unpatched version
worked fine.
There exists already a PatchScript line
Benjamin Reed wrote:
[]
As I'm not a compiler guru, I must be missing something. Is PPL
something that is part of the GCC build? Googling PPL gives me a
million false positives.
And fink apropos ppl shows nothing called ppl.
What *is* ppl?
--
Martin
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
configure:16037: checking for libpng = 0.9.6
configure:16088: gcc -o conftest -O2 -fno-common -Wall -Wpointer-
arith -Wnested-externs -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include -framework
Carbon -L/sw/lib conftest.c -lpng -lz -lm 5
With this combination of -I and -L it
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
It built for me, anyway (10.5.4), and links to the proper libpng library.
Do we want a revision bump, since it _built_ without libpng support (if
you have xmkmf) before the fix?
Good remark. I'm bumping it.
--
Martin
Daniel Macks wrote:
Please apply the fix in whatever way is easiest.
OK, checked into CVS, version tcltk-8.4.16-5.
This patch should work with all tcltk versions and all X11 versions,
until the tcltk developers themselves start doing something about it.
--
Martin
Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
I was wondering about something odd I noticed in the PDB today. Go
look at http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/wireshark, it
says that 1.0.2 of wireshark is the latest version in the powerpc
stable trees, but 0.99.5-1011 is the latest in the i386
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
Does incorporating this patch mean that a libtk build against an
older libX11 will not work properly if libX11 is upgraded to one
that has these renumbered events? That is, are the constants
*different* on an older x11 with vs without the patch (either the one
here or
Dinker Charak wrote:
Hi,
Is there a doc that describes the package life cycle? I submitted a
package 'kloc' and now the statis in the Tracker shows it to be
closed. I see that the info file has been moved to
dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/devel/kloc.info. What happens next?
Is there
Here is a message from the maintainer of the xquartz updates to the
x11-users list. The message means that the breakage of tcltk will be
over as soon as xquartz-2.3.1 comes out.
OTOH, the patch for tcltk I proposed will change *strictly nothing* when
tcltk is compiled with any X11 different
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
We had a similar problem with pymol in the past, and that involved a
bit of additional hacking on the package to get it to work properly.
I may have some time to muck around with it this evening, if nobody
else beats me to it.
Too late :-)
I got a patch files
Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
Gnu day all,
Did anyone get an issue like this please :
http://paste.lisp.org/display/64008
[]
(/sw/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/psnfss/pifont.sty
(/sw/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/psnfss/upzd.fd)kpathsea: Running mktextfm pzdr
mktextfm: Running mf-nowin
David van der Spoel wrote:
[]
Can't one just set some compiler flags -m64 for C, C++ and linking? Why
I didn't say it was difficult, did I? Making Fink packages is often not
difficult. In particular if you start from an existing package, then all
the bureaucratic parts of the package
Chunky Kibbles wrote:
[]
A little further investigation reveals that it's actually graphviz that
has the truly fearsome dependency list, from which all others derive.
And of course, graphviz is listed as a dependency in doxygen.
Even worse than graphviz is swig, but fortunately it is only a
Juan Courcoul wrote:
A few days ago I asked on Fink Users if it was safe to update to XCode
3.1 and at the moment there was no serious impediment and important
benefits. Then pangocairo landed Since this seems to be where
most of the bloody carnage ( :D ) seems to be happening,
Michal Suchanek wrote:
[]
It was fixed by debfoster so it looks like build files from the
installed packages laeking into the build.
Yes, this seems to be caused by a libtool bug. Simply removing the old
gtk+2-dev first (which is what debfoster probably did) avoids it.
--
Martin
Juan Courcoul wrote:
[]
Unfortunately, the Xcode 3.1 installer does not allow that degree of
granularity and will install the SDK regardless. I'll have to play
around with a clone to see if the older 3.0 SDK package will allow
itself to be installed overwriting the newer 3.1 version.
Rodney Myers wrote:
[]
Failed: phase installing: aquaterm-1.0.1-2 failed
Before reporting any errors, please run fink selfupdate and
try again.
I concur. Try aquaterm-1.0.1-3.
--
Martin
-
This SF.Net email is
Michael G. Ross wrote:
Installing from scratch, with unstable active, I installed unison-nox,
then tetex successfully. When I tried to install octave, it compiled
and installed many packages and then stopped reporting a circular
dependency.
Here is the vicious cycle of dependencies:
Chunky Kibbles wrote:
Hola,
I've just reinstalled fink from scratch. The first package I attempted
to install was libcaca [actually, second, after aalib which had almost
no dependencies]:
lefty:etc chunky$ fink install libcaca-dev
Information about 6992 packages read in 0 seconds.
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
All of unstable is coherently using the pango1-xft2-ft219 library
instead of pango1-xft2; only -ft219 should be used for anything in
unstable.
My experience in update-all'ing from pre-pc to post-pc was not very
pleasant. I think now (after 7 hours of repeated
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
Another problem is that there are still quite a few packages, among them
the central pango1-xft2-ft219 itself, that do not build on an xmkmf-less
system. At least
pango1-xft2-ft219.info
gst-plugins-base-0.10.info
gtkglext1.info (this is where I am hanging right
William Scott wrote:
Here is what I get when trying to update pine:
cc -L/sw/lib -g -O2 -DDEBUG -I/sw/include -DENABLE_LDAP -Dconst= -
DSYSTYPE=\OSX\ -o pine addrbook.o adrbkcmd.o adrbklib.o args.o
bldaddr.o context.o filter.o folder.o help.o helptext.o imap.o init.o
mailcap.o
Matthew Pounsett wrote:
On 08-Jul-2008, at 16:56 , Martin Costabel wrote:
Must be something on your machine or network. On 2 10.5.4 systems I
get the output you say is correct, namely more or less the same as
this one:
Okay, thanks to the people that responded. It looks like the two
Matthew Pounsett wrote:
On 09-Jul-2008, at 02:17 , Martin Costabel wrote:
Matthew Pounsett wrote:
On 08-Jul-2008, at 16:56 , Martin Costabel wrote:
Must be something on your machine or network. On 2 10.5.4 systems I
get the output you say is correct, namely more or less the same
Matthew Pounsett wrote:
[]
I actually never noticed the problem on 10.5.3 .. it started for me a
few weeks ago after a patch to 10.5.4. It seems unlikely that it was a
Looking at the date of your first message in this thread, I conclude
that you used some beta version of 10.5.4, not the
Matthew Pounsett wrote:
Possibly related... on my systems where mtr cannot do forward lookups,
the +trace option to the default install of 'dig' also appears broken.
Can anyone else confirm that this is broken on their 10.5.4 machines
and/or working on 10.4? If anyone can confirm this
Charles Lepple wrote:
I think someone just ran into a similar problem on #fink. Are we sure
that there is a way to upgrade the package lists from 0.9.0 to see the
new 0.27.15 that was added to current/?
The following sequence works for me (apart from the previously found
selfupdate-cvs
Alexander Hansen wrote:
On Thursday 03 July 2008 09:36:20 Vincent Beffara wrote:
(i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a
patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision
number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server
...
An
Asko Kauppi wrote:
Just reporting a problem building freetype2-dev 2.1.4-12 on my
machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465).
Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)...
Seems I'm not the first:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15268.html
Kevin Horton wrote:
It isn't at all obvious how I would commit this package to the
unstable tree. Do I not have commit privileges from the tracker, or
do I simply need to puzzle out how it works? My SF ID is rv8.
There is no direct way to commit from the tracker, if this was your
Vincent Beffara wrote:
Hi,
[]
I am interested in something similar myself, and thought essentially of
two solutions :
(i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a patch
script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision number. The
base tarball might be empty
Kevin Horton wrote:
[]
It builds OK for me on 10.5.3 in maintainer mode with --build-as-
nobody. It runs as well
as any previous versions I have tried. This appears to be ready to be
committed, but I'm no expert.
The latter has never stopped me from committing in the past :-) (Not
Jonathan Stickel wrote:
What is the best way to work with a Fink installed file that is shared
and modified by a set of different fink packages?
I ran into this problem when I attempted to write separate .info files
for each of the of the octave-forge packages (currently a monolithic
201 - 300 of 1332 matches
Mail list logo
