Original Message
The 1000 has become a super radio with the advent of the SDR-X
software.
I am having a few problems with my PC that I normally use for
downloading Flex-Radio updates, it's been playing up for a while and
bad clusters on the HDD have been found on it.
The PC that I
I will zip up the install files and post an address to download soon.
w5ami
On 4/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original Message
The 1000 has become a super radio with the advent of the SDR-X
software.
I am having a few problems with my PC that I normally use
On 4/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original Message
The 1000 has become a super radio with the advent of the SDR-X
software.
I am having a few problems with my PC that I normally use for
downloading Flex-Radio updates, it's been playing up for a while and
bad
You can download SVN1124 at http://www.w5ami.net/svn1124.zip
This is a full install.
w5ami
On 4/7/07, A.R.S. - W5AMI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will zip up the install files and post an address to download soon.
w5ami
On 4/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original Message
You can download SVN1124 at http://www.w5ami.net/svn1124.zip
This is a full install.
w5ami
Thanks for that.
I'll also try and figure out how to install SVN onto a memory stick as
well. Thanks for that suggestion.
At least I have a version on a memory stick that I
This post may well be lost in the passion of the SDR-5000 but I'll throw
it out here anyway!
Dave W9AD and I, with the help of Jerry Flanders W4UK and John W8TPH
have successfully married the Flex SDR-1000 and the Yaesu Quadra
amplifier. The Quadra will follow the SDR when changing bands like
Larry,
Very cool, it's not lost. I also have a Quadra and would be interested in
seeing how you guys did this exactly. Do you plan to write up anything?
Steve - K5FR
-Original Message-
This post may well be lost in the passion of the SDR-5000 but I'll throw it
out here anyway!
Dave
Reflector'
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-1000 Interfaced to Yaesu Quadra
Larry,
Very cool, it's not lost. I also have a Quadra and would be interested
in seeing how you guys did this exactly. Do you plan to write up
anything?
Steve - K5FR
-Original Message-
This post may well be lost
That's the reassurance I was looking for.
I was beginning to wonder if I should flog my SDR-1000 before the market
is flooded by owners who want to upgrade to the 5000 and it be becomes
worthless (I already see them hitting the swap shops), or if the value
will be sustained due to demand for a
On 4/6/07, Hugh Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the reassurance I was looking for.
I was beginning to wonder if I should flog my SDR-1000 before the market
is flooded by owners who want to upgrade to the 5000 and it be becomes
worthless (I already see them hitting the swap shops), or if
Looks like a very good rig.
Does it have hardware ALC provision for compatibility with modern amps?
Jerry W4UK
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link:
I was wondering if there is any information relating to electrical noise and
grounding issues when comparing the base SDR-5000 radio with the C and D units.
Will the C and D units be electrically quieter simply because on the C and D
units the computer is integrated into the radio case?
Mark
On 4/4/07, Neal Campbell K3NC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
Neal Campbell K3NC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give us some details about the SDR-5000 ad please.
73 Phil N8VB
___
FlexRadio mailing
where did you see this? (month page?)
phil AB2JL
- Original Message -
From: Neal Campbell K3NC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Flex-radio Reflector flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 2:37 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] SDR-5000
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When
On 4/4/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/04/07 02:37 pm Neal Campbell K3NC wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST again without seeing anything
about an SDR-5000. There doesn't seem to be a FlexRadio ad at
Philip Covington wrote:
On 4/4/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/04/07 02:37 pm Neal Campbell K3NC wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST again without seeing anything
about an SDR-5000. There doesn't seem
On 04/04/07 03:35 pm I wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST again without seeing anything
about an SDR-5000. There doesn't seem to be a FlexRadio ad at all.
I have been informed in a personal e-mail that the ad's in
On 4/4/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/04/07 03:35 pm I wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST again without seeing anything
about an SDR-5000. There doesn't seem to be a FlexRadio ad at all.
I have
At 01:30 PM 4/4/2007, Philip Covington wrote:
On 4/4/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/04/07 03:35 pm I wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST again without seeing anything
about an SDR-5000. There
: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-5000
where did you see this? (month page?)
phil AB2JL
- Original Message -
From: Neal Campbell K3NC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Flex-radio Reflector flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 2:37 PM
Subject
On 04/04/07 05:52 pm Jim Lux wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST again without seeing anything
about an SDR-5000. There doesn't seem to be a FlexRadio ad at all.
I have been informed in a personal e-mail that the
Reflector
flexradio@flex-radio.biz; Neal Campbell K3NC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Terry Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-5000
I heard it is in the May 2007 QST. Those who get quick delivery have the
issue already. For the rest of us, any day now
PROTECTED]; philip gentile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Flex-radio Reflector flexradio@flex-radio.biz;
Neal Campbell K3NC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-5000
As a follow-up, I think there is even a review of the new rig, along
with
pricing.
I
Bob Maser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(04/04/2007 19:23)
Why doesn't a Diamond member of ARGL scan the ad and put it on the
reflector for all of us lesser guys to see? They probably called it the
5000 because it going to be 5 times as much money.
Bob W6TR
If they have the money to be a
Now now John. The president of ARRL is a proud SDR-1000 owner and a
reader of this group. He and the technology task force and CTO for the
League have been staunch supporters of SDR and its implications. The
SDR-5000 is no longer a real secret. I suspected it would not be a
secret from
Did that QST issue come out on April 1?
John
KK6IL
Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:30 PM 4/4/2007, Philip Covington wrote:
On 4/4/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/04/07 03:35 pm I wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-5000
Bob Maser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(04/04/2007 19:23)
Why doesn't a Diamond member of ARGL scan the ad and put it on the
reflector for all of us lesser guys to see? They probably called it the
5000 because it going
What? No response from Flex?
I smell a rat!!!
(I didnt say I smell like a rat)
Stan
AH6JR
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 12:03 pm, Alan NV8A wrote:
On 04/04/07 05:52 pm Jim Lux wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST
I see the button of doom is gone, all is ok with the world. W8XO
Mike Naruta wrote:
Maybe instead of labeling it Button 1,
you could label it, Do Not Push 1.
That would guarantee that we would all
be testing it out. :)
I love alpha test stubs. Please leave them in.
Mike - AA8K
Bob
:* Saturday, March 31, 2007 4:53 PM
*Subject:* [Flexradio] SDR-X
Well, some how I got it down loaded and it works fb. However, this
Button1, I take it I don't want the antenna connected when I
push it?
Strange things happened when I did, so I recalibrated with my XG2.
W8XO
Rejection function for some
reason. I posted a bug report on it.
Frank
- Original Message -
*From:* Dave Muskopf
*To:* FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
*Sent:* Saturday, March 31, 2007 4:53 PM
*Subject:* [Flexradio] SDR-X
Well, some how I got it down loaded
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:54 AM
To: Dave Muskopf; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-X button1
Dave, I noticed the same thing. Have never read what the real purpose of
the
Button 1 is.
Mabe someone would like to explain.
Owen KB5XE
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-X button1
Dave, I noticed the same thing. Have never read what the real purpose of
the
Button 1 is.
Mabe someone would like to explain.
Owen KB5XE
-- Original message --
From: Dave Muskopf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes Frank, that seems
SVN console
and the official software release. Is anyone else noticing this?
Frank WA3JBT
- Original Message -
From: FlexRadio - Eric
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 'Dave Muskopf' ; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-X button1
: RE: [Flexradio] SDR-X button1
Bob, I did push it. Seems to want to tune receive reject mode.
All is working okay. Shall I delete all the the code and acquire it again?
Thanks Owen KB5XE
-- Original message --
From: Bob Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED
in the software before
releasing it. Don't push it.
Bob K5KDN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:54 AM
To: Dave Muskopf; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-X
Maybe instead of labeling it Button 1,
you could label it, Do Not Push 1.
That would guarantee that we would all
be testing it out. :)
I love alpha test stubs. Please leave them in.
Mike - AA8K
Bob Tracy wrote:
Button 1 is a test stub Eric accidently left in the software before
Hey Mike, I like it also. If I get in trouble, I can wipe the slate clean and
start over.
LEAVE ALL THEM IN..
Owen KB5XE
-- Original message --
From: Mike Naruta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe instead of labeling it Button 1,
you could label it, Do Not Push 1.
Well, some how I got it down loaded and it works fb. However, this
Button1, I take it I don't want the antenna connected when I push it?
Strange things happened when I did, so I recalibrated with my XG2. W8XO
___
FlexRadio mailing list
, March 31, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] SDR-X
Well, some how I got it down loaded and it works fb. However, this
Button1, I take it I don't want the antenna connected when I push it?
Strange things happened when I did, so I recalibrated with my XG2. W8XO
Which is then followed by the Raleigh Hamfest on Sundayyeah (again)
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of k5nwa
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 11:54 PM
To: Flex Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR Linux User Group Meeting at 0100Z
Any Flex users using the SDR-1000 with DXBase 2007?
I'm a new user of the Flex but have been using DXB for years. Radio logger
loses communication after a while.
Using N8VBvCom driver. Have tried many settings but no change. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Tony W7GO
-- next part --
And fortunately, Thursday is followed by Friday, then the Ft Smith
Hamfest...yeah!
At 01:10 PM 3/29/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I can't believe it is Thursday already. Just a
reminder that the SDR Linux User Group will be meeting on March 30 at
0100Z. That is 9:00PM EDT in
Flexers if you should happen to have an Orion and want a panadaptor that
really works with it I suggest you use your SDR. It hooks up easily to
the Orion by pulling the interior plug that goes to the scan preamp and
running it out to the input of your SDR. Tune your SDR to approximately
9mhz.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flexers if you should happen to have an Orion and want a panadaptor that
really works with it I suggest you use your SDR. It hooks up easily to
the Orion by pulling the interior plug that goes to the scan preamp and
running it out to the input of your SDR. Tune your
Hello Everyone,
The next SDR Linux User Group meeting will be held (Thursday Evening in
the US) on March 23, 2007 at 0100Z. Please note the local time is the
same as our previous meetings except for those that are located in
Arizona, Hawaii and some parts of Alaska.
In the Continental
Hi Smitty,
Just curious, are you using the Enhanced SSB profile?
If so, do they say the same about the DX/Contest profile?
If you are transmitting a significant part of your
power at the low and high frequencies not in their
passband, it may be heard as not as loud.
Mike - AA8K
Myrlen
Hi Mike,
The profile doesn't make any difference. I've even tried the conventional
setting which is identical to the Icom but the reports are the same.
Smitty
- Original Message -
From: Mike Narutamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Myrlen Smithmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
: Myrlen Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:00 PM
To: 'FlexRadio'; Eric Wachsmann
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR drive power
Eric please read my post again you'll see that all your questions have been
answered. And the drive is set to 100.
The one item I didn't
Smitty,
Just curious if you are using the same mic to make your tests from one
rig to another. Average talk power has a lot to do with the freq.
response of the mic. If a mic has a lot of energy between 200 and 800
cps it will produce lots of talk power since the there is a lot of
energy from
Hello Everyone,
Just
a reminder that the regular Thursday night SDR Linux User Group on
TeamSpeak meeting is this evening (in the US) at 0200Z. This is a
chance to find out what is new with Software Defined Radio and
Linux. You can also find answers to questions that you may be having
about
I have a question for the group maybe some have had this issue.
My drive power on ssb seems to be down 10 db in comparing it to my 756pro. I've
made these tests on all bands so its not band related or antenna related.
On key down both rigs are in 5-10 watts of one another but on ssb the 756pro
: [Flexradio] SDR drive power
I have a question for the group maybe some have had this issue.
My drive power on ssb seems to be down 10 db in comparing it to my 756pro.
I've made these tests on all bands so its not band related or antenna
related.
On key down both rigs are in 5-10 watts
] ;
'FlexRadio'mailto:FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] SDR drive power
What soundcard are you using? If using the Delta 44, it could be that you
don't have enough Signal to Noise on the mic input. What does the Mic
setting on the TX
I made some more progress on an SDR-1000 console for Mac OSX. Though the
recording software I used to capture the movie messed up the sound, it
doesn't actually sound anything like that. Also it appears the audio is a
bit out of sync on the video too. Here is a quick video for anyone
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio
Hello Everyone,
Just a reminder that the regular Thursday night SDR Linux User Group
on TeamSpeak meeting is tomorrow evening (in the US) at 0200Z. This is a
chance to find
out what is new with Software Defined Radio and Linux. You can also
find answers to questions that you may be having
Hello Everyone,
Just a reminder that the SDR Linux User Group meeting is this evening (in the
US) at 0200Z. This is a chance to find out what is new with Software Defined
Radio and Linux. You can also find answers to questions that you may be having
about Linux. Stop by and join in.
Dan
Eric Wachsmann wrote:
I will stand by my previous statement: As long as Windows is the primary
Operating System for our customers, we will continue to
support/maintain/improve a windows Console. Again, this does not
prevent us
from branching out into the linux and Mac world with a
How tough would it be to provide different pan-adapter bandwidths
independent of sampling rate? Running at 192000 would minimize latency
and refactoring of the display would provide the narrow band resolution
needed.
73,
Kirb - VE6IV
--
___
At 07:02 PM 2/21/2007, Robert McGwier wrote:
Jim L
What needs to happen is that the receive and transmit streams run
continuously, in parallel, and the hardware is switched over from Tx
to Rx (or reverse). The hardware switch can occur in well under a
millisecond (relay closing time is
Jim Lux wrote:
At 07:02 PM 2/21/2007, Robert McGwier wrote:
Jim L
What needs to happen is that the receive and transmit streams run
continuously, in parallel, and the hardware is switched over from Tx
to Rx (or reverse). The hardware switch can occur in well under a
millisecond (relay
Excellent Bob.
I thought that it would be held for
the big Dayton show. It will be nice
to give it a shakedown before Dayton.
Thanks again to you and the team who
have made this such an exciting shift
in amateur radio. The way this has
blossomed is testimony to the skill
and openness of the
At 01:03 AM 2/22/2007, Kirb Nesbitt wrote:
How tough would it be to provide different pan-adapter bandwidths
independent of sampling rate?
The trick is more in the UI than in the backend. It would be pretty
straightforward to have a spectrogram type application taking the
feed from the analog
On 2/22/07, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:42 AM 2/22/2007, Frank Brickle wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
And when will PowerSDR have the new dttsp v2.0 integrated?
Does the Windows dttsp v2.0/PowerSDR v2.x still use PortAudio?
That is entirely up to Flex.
The development trunk now
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of Philip Covington
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:58 PM
To: Jim Lux
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-1000 CW Contest Performance
I really can't blame Flex for choosing Windows.
Phil N8VB
with a multiplatform
offering.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: Philip Covington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:38 PM
To: Eric Wachsmann
Cc: Jim Lux; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-1000 CW Contest Performance
On 2/22/07, Eric Wachsmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did respond... privately. :) I'll summarize the main points below:
I'm not sure I would say that we have punted on supporting other operating
systems. Rather, I would say that we have chosen to stay in business.
Whether Flex chose
Besides, there are a few of us that loath Linux.
Chris - AE6VK
-Original Message-
From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:34 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] SDR-1000 CW Contest Performance
At 08:42 AM 2/22/2007
Eric Wachsmann wrote:
I will stand by my previous statement: As long as Windows is the primary
Operating System for our customers, we will continue to
support/maintain/improve a windows Console. Again, this does not prevent us
from branching out into the linux and Mac world with a
Jim Lux wrote:
At 06:42 PM 2/20/2007, Ned Johnson wrote:
Why not resample the 192kHz. input down to 48kHz. on the
fly as a button selectable option for receive, while leaving the
I/O stream intact to preserve the lower latency for transmit.
Ned, K1NJ
Kirb Nesbitt [EMAIL
Kirby,
As much as I would have liked to run the FA-66 at 192K for minimizing
latency in the CW contest, I had to drop to 48K to get the 2 Khz panadapter
window. There is inadequate zoom range to get that small a panadapter
window at 192K. Maybe the Flex programmers could increase the zoom
Charles,
while I fully understand the intent behind sharpening up the filters for
battle in contests etc., I've found that in practice the radio continues
to exhibit excellent filter response using DSP buffer and sampling rate
settings which, while not absolutely optimized from a filter
Why not resample the 192kHz. input down to 48kHz. on the
fly as a button selectable option for receive, while leaving the
I/O stream intact to preserve the lower latency for transmit.
Ned, K1NJ
Kirb Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles,
while I fully understand the intent
At 06:42 PM 2/20/2007, Ned Johnson wrote:
Why not resample the 192kHz. input down to 48kHz. on the
fly as a button selectable option for receive, while leaving the
I/O stream intact to preserve the lower latency for transmit.
Ned, K1NJ
Kirb Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For
Hi all
paste this message from TopBand forum:
73 Beppe
IK3VIG
===
I wouldn't want anyone to get the impression mixer noise is
less or non-existent on a SDR!!
All mixers generate noise, and the typical mixer (once we
move away from 6BE6 converter tubes) is so
I saw that on the 160 reflector. I sent a response to
Tom W8JI as follows. I think it is a worthwhile
discussion so that people get a clearer understanding
of different system strenghts and weaknesses:
Tom
Thanks for your analysis. One thing that is different
for the SDR-1000 on 160 compared
Flex Radio SDR-1000, 1 year Old, Excellent w/ Delta 44 K6KDK 559-240-1579
===
also available:
US Tower HDX-572 MDPL w/ Motor Drive w/ Coax Arm w/ TRX 80 Raising Fixture
In Selma California. Pick Up Only, All factory refurb by US Towers 2 yrs
Hello Everyone,
The audio file from Thursday's SDR Linux User Group meeting on Teamspeak has
been uploaded to HamSDR.com. The direct link for the mp3 file is
http://www.hamsdr.com/personaldirectory.aspx?id=497. My apologies to Craig
KC2LFI, the first 10 seconds of his conversation has gone
Be sure to archive the discussion for us lurkers. I suspect that Linux
will be more and more important for both Flex and the HPSDR groups in the
future as Vista slows the whole system and XP becomes unsupported. Some
sporterized OS would really be of future value. Thanks,
N0UU
Hi Everyone,
After
a week of sporadic internet connectivity and a couple of 18 hour work
days, I am back up and running with over 400 emails in my inbox. The
SDR Linux User Group meeting will be this evening at 0200Z. That is
9:00 PM in the East and 6:00 PM in the West. This evening our
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Babcock
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:35 PM
To: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: [Flexradio] SDR Linux User Group on TeamSpeak
Hi Everyone,
After
a week of sporadic internet connectivity and a couple of 18 hour work
days, I am back up and running with over 400 emails
Hi John,
You got the wrong Dave!!!
I have use the SDR on AM and have worked many guys. I have aways got excellent
reports. In addion, I have listen to myself on W4MO's SDR Remote Base and my
audio sounds GREAT! I have worked some big time AM guys and they cannot believe
it is an SDR.
No, I
Sometimes when I use the SDR-1000, the audio cuts out and then back on,
pulsing like that about once or twice per second.
I found a solution, which is to turn off PowerSDR and Turn off my Edirol
FA-66, then restart both.
It's not a big deal and doesn't do it often, but I was wondering if this is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of Doug McCann VA3CR
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:54 AM
To: Flex Radio Posting
Subject: [Flexradio] SDR Audio Problem
Sometimes when I use the SDR-1000, the audio cuts out and then back on,
pulsing
to see if it happens again.
Thanks again for the tremendous support.
Doug, VA3CR
www.va3cr.net
-Original Message-
From: Eric Wachsmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 31, 2007 4:49 PM
To: 'Doug McCann VA3CR'
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] SDR Audio Problem
You may also
Hello Everyone,
Just a reminder that there will be another SDR Linux User Group meeting
tomorrow evening at 0200Z on TeamSpeak. That is 9:00 PM on the East
coast and 6:00PM on the West coast. BTW, the plan is to have a meeting
every Thursday night (in the US) until further notice.
This
Also consider the FA-66 latency. Control for this is
accessed in the control panel. You may need to
increase the latency a little. You have to turn
off/on the FA-66 to get the change to take.
73 W9OY
Do
(a)amsat.org .
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens k5nu
Verzonden: zo 28-1-2007 5:56
Aan: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Onderwerp: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Thanks for all the replies to my original problem with the differing swr
readings between the sdr and other rigs
Last night on the same antenna, swr on the external digital meter, 1.05 , power
out on Tune- 11w.
This morning without changing a thing, swr 3.8, power out on Tune 42w.
Of course putting another radio in its place, swr 1.0 as usual.
The puzzling part is that this happens so far only on one
By the way, my current mode of operation is as follows:
Warm up the 756 Pro and amp. Listen on the sdr. When I find a dx station I
want to work, I switch to the Icom to work him. Just this morning I found
Zone 18 calling on 80 longpath. Switched to the Icom and worked him, then back
to
A question for the group. On the transmit tab I have the Tune set to Zero.
I still have 35w output as I click the Tune button. Is that normal? Also on
my external wattmeter, the power out in the Tune position, is very unstable.
It will flutter back and forth by as much as 25-30 watts.
PROTECTED] Behalf Of k5nu
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 5:08 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] sdr swr
A question for the group. On the transmit tab I have the Tune set to
Zero. I still have 35w output as I click the Tune button. Is that normal?
Also on my external wattmeter
At 03:08 AM 1/28/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike
What is still wondering me the most is that when the SWR is close to
1, the transmitter impedance
should not have any influence on the SWR.
Actually, no.. think about this... what if the Transmitter output Z
were 100 ohms... You'd still
]
Sent: Sun 28-1-2007 14:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Peter, I appreciate your reply to my message. I am very nearly ready to sell
the SDR and move on. It has driven me crazy. I have sent it to Austin twice,
but they can't seem to find anything wrong with it. Back
]
Sent: Sun 28-1-2007 15:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
At 03:08 AM 1/28/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike
What is still wondering me the most is that when the SWR is close to
1, the transmitter impedance
should not have any influence
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of k5nu
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 5:08 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] sdr swr
A question for the group. On the transmit tab I have the Tune set to
Zero. I still have 35w output as I click the Tune button. Is that normal?
Also on my external
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Anderson
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 10:26 AM
To: k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Mike,
Here's an experiment to try: unplug, at the SDR, the audio cable from
:1.
Best regards,
- Jeff, K6JCA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 7:23 AM
To: Jim Lux; k5nu; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Jim, see in text
73 (sorry no spell checker
; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Onderwerp: RE: [Flexradio] sdr swr
Hi Peter,
I believe your statement that SWR is affected by the generator's impedance
is a common misconception. Actually, SWR, as is typically defined, is
independent of generator (i.e. transmitter, in our case) impedance. It is
only
701 - 800 of 1157 matches
Mail list logo
